From owner-ietf-schema-reg@imc.org  Thu Jan 27 14:28:24 2000
Received: from ns.secondary.com (ns.secondary.com [208.184.76.39])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA12763
	for <schema-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:28:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA26716
	for ietf-schema-reg-bks; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nix.swip.net (nix.swip.net [192.71.220.2])
	by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26712
	for <ietf-schema-reg@imc.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 192.168.111.25 (workstation1.swip.net [130.244.254.1]) 
          by nix.swip.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP 
          id UAA27941; 
          Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:15:24 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:15:37 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@swip.net>
To: ietf-schema-reg@imc.org
cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@ietf.org>
Subject: Closure of the SCHEMA wg
Message-ID: <838925.3157992937@[192.168.111.25]>
X-Mailer: Mulberry (MacOS) [2.0.0b7, s/n U-301169]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-ietf-schema-reg@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-schema-reg/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-schema-reg.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-schema-reg-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To the SCHEMA wg

Because of the unfortunate problems of actually creating the listing
service specified in the documents of this working group, I don't see that
the working group will succeed with the milestones given in the charter.
The documents are from my point of view basically done apart from the text
which is supposed to describe the actual listing service itself, and that
text can not be created until the listing service exists.

I have therefore reported to the IESG on jan 27 2000 that I have the
intention to close this working group if nothing happens within the next
two weeks (before feb 10 2000).

If the schema registry is created some time in the future, I see no
problem restarting the work with these issues where I see the wg
has stalled, but not in this wg.

    Patrik Faltstrom
    Area Director, Applications Area





From owner-ietf-schema-reg@imc.org  Thu Jan 27 15:08:00 2000
Received: from ns.secondary.com (ns.secondary.com [208.184.76.39])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13774
	for <schema-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:07:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA27706
	for ietf-schema-reg-bks; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.3.124])
	by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA27702
	for <ietf-schema-reg@imc.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 157.54.9.104 by mail2.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:52:57 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Received: by INET-IMC-02 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <DW6NPJZT>; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:52:56 -0800
Message-ID: <B9D1827FDF66D111925800805F3102E318F1695D@RED-MSG-57>
From: Chris Weider <cweider@microsoft.com>
To: "'Patrik Faltstrom'" <paf@swip.net>, ietf-schema-reg@imc.org
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Closure of the SCHEMA wg
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:52:47 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Sender: owner-ietf-schema-reg@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-schema-reg/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-schema-reg.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-schema-reg-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

I agree with this outcome.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrik Faltstrom [mailto:paf@swip.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 11:16 AM
To: ietf-schema-reg@imc.org
Cc: IESG; IAB
Subject: Closure of the SCHEMA wg


To the SCHEMA wg

Because of the unfortunate problems of actually creating the listing
service specified in the documents of this working group, I don't see that
the working group will succeed with the milestones given in the charter.
The documents are from my point of view basically done apart from the text
which is supposed to describe the actual listing service itself, and that
text can not be created until the listing service exists.

I have therefore reported to the IESG on jan 27 2000 that I have the
intention to close this working group if nothing happens within the next
two weeks (before feb 10 2000).

If the schema registry is created some time in the future, I see no
problem restarting the work with these issues where I see the wg
has stalled, but not in this wg.

    Patrik Faltstrom
    Area Director, Applications Area




