Subject: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call

From: Leif Johansson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:35:06 +0200

Folks,

At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing
33 as suggested in the issue tracker.

This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now
if you disagree.

        Leif & Morteza

---

From: Phil Hunt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:43:07 -0700

I agree with the consensus.

Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com
[email-masked]

On 2013-04-10, at 11:35 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:

> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

---

From: Anthony Nadalin <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:52 +0000

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:43 PM
To: Leif Johansson
Cc: scim WG
Subject: Re: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call

Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com
[email-masked]

On 2013-04-10, at 11:35 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:

> This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up 
> now if you disagree.
> 
>        Leif & Morteza
>

---

From: Chris Phillips <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:38:41 -0400

I agree with the consensus call for closing #33 as suggested in the issue
tracker.

C.