From phil.hunt@oracle.com Tue Apr 2 10:46:58 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E69321F8C1E for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:46:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujUw3ICzNVjv for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198FE21F8A8A for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r32Hkt8q010054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:46:56 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r32HktVj008597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:46:55 GMT Received: from abhmt101.oracle.com (abhmt101.oracle.com [141.146.116.53]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r32HktLl022688 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:46:55 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.14] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:46:55 -0700 From: Phil Hunt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:46:39 -0700 Message-Id: To: "scim@ietf.org WG" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Subject: [scim] Ticket 40: standard format for schema extensions X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:46:58 -0000 In Ticket 38, we have a proposal on how schema extensions should be = work. However there is still not standard way to communicate required = extensions. I've added a ticket (#40) to cover this item. Ticket 40 is = of particular importance to those building apps to run on generic SCIM = Service Providers and need a way to communicate needed extensions in a = consistent format. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com From phil.hunt@oracle.com Wed Apr 3 08:51:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7266D21F8EC3 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.949 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72abUE0De+yN for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F8421F8EC1 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r33FpOmO007317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:51:25 GMT Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r33FpOhH020254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:51:24 GMT Received: from abhmt114.oracle.com (abhmt114.oracle.com [141.146.116.66]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r33FpOQJ024780 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:51:24 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.14] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:51:23 -0700 From: Phil Hunt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:51:23 -0700 Message-Id: <07AE5038-B4A5-4AB7-8A22-5BF8D15D7F3F@oracle.com> To: "scim@ietf.org WG" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Subject: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:51:26 -0000 At the Orlando meeting I proposed that Ticket 31 (Support for Consistent = Paged Results) be dropped due to unclear need. The feedback from those present was that more information was desired. One use case we have talked about for consistent results is to reconcile = data in the cloud and in particular detect deletions that have or have = not occurred and thus are out of sync with the service provider. =20 Just to get a better feel for this issue (ticket 31) do you: 1. Need a method for reconciliation (which may use paging or some other = method) 2. Have another reason for wanting consistent paged results. If so, = can you describe it? Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Wed Apr 3 08:54:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1BB21F8F44 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JteDW-jm5nv for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD9621F8F29 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail9-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.236) by CO9EHSOBE022.bigfish.com (10.236.130.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:54:17 +0000 Received: from mail9-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46C5C400F9; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:54:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371I542Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dh18602eh8275bhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail9-co9: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail9-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1365004411838226_9577; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CO9EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.248]) by mail9-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E86AC00AB; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CO9EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (10.236.130.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:28 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Phil Hunt , "scim@ietf.org WG" Thread-Topic: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group Thread-Index: AQHOMIMgbBXKRQdf30CjItFaei9KE5jEpZPg Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:27 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5D97@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <07AE5038-B4A5-4AB7-8A22-5BF8D15D7F3F@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <07AE5038-B4A5-4AB7-8A22-5BF8D15D7F3F@oracle.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 3671AFCC00408E3671B119 x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: Re: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:54:19 -0000 > 1. Need a method for reconciliation (which may use paging or some other = method) Yes > 2. Have another reason for wanting consistent paged results. No --Kelly -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phi= l Hunt Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:51 AM To: scim@ietf.org WG Subject: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group At the Orlando meeting I proposed that Ticket 31 (Support for Consistent Pa= ged Results) be dropped due to unclear need. The feedback from those present was that more information was desired. One use case we have talked about for consistent results is to reconcile da= ta in the cloud and in particular detect deletions that have or have not oc= curred and thus are out of sync with the service provider. =20 Just to get a better feel for this issue (ticket 31) do you: 1. Need a method for reconciliation (which may use paging or some other me= thod) 2. Have another reason for wanting consistent paged results. If so,= can you describe it? Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Wed Apr 3 09:03:39 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA3221F8510 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftNC5ebyX8iu for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0184.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E05A21F84C1 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail220-db8-R.bigfish.com (10.174.8.226) by DB8EHSOBE024.bigfish.com (10.174.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:36 +0000 Received: from mail220-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail220-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD6D320166 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -21 X-BigFish: PS-21(zzc85fh4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL17326ah8275dh18c673h8275bhz31h2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail220-db8: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail220-db8 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail220-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 1365005014831907_6086; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DB8EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.235]) by mail220-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259A2004B for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by DB8EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (10.174.4.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:32 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.162]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:28 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Feedback on proposed extensibility changes Thread-Index: Ac4wg8bR6O3OOf0fTRi6xTna3xHEtw== Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:03:28 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5DCE@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 367AD8FE00408E367ADA4B x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5DCEBLUPRD0412MB643_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: [scim] Feedback on proposed extensibility changes X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:03:39 -0000 --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5DCEBLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In Orlando I proposed some changes to clarify the schema extension model wi= thin SCIM. Solving this would introduce some non-backwards compatible chan= ges, but this is an important issue to solve as more people start to deploy= SCIM in different ways. Please review the problem statement in issue #38 (http://trac.tools.ietf.or= g/wg/scim/trac/ticket/38) and the high-level proposed changes that are outl= ined in comment #1. I would like to get some feedback from the working gr= oup before trying to add these changes into the drafts. Thanks, --Kelly --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5DCEBLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In Orlando I proposed some changes to clarify the sc= hema extension model within SCIM.  Solving this would introduce some n= on-backwards compatible changes, but this is an important issue to solve as= more people start to deploy SCIM in different ways.

 

Please review the problem statement in issue #38 (http://trac.too= ls.ietf.org/wg/scim/trac/ticket/38) and the high-level proposed changes= that are outlined in comment #1.   I would like to get some feedback from the working group before trying to ad= d these changes into the drafts.

 

Thanks,

--Kelly

--_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5DCEBLUPRD0412MB643_-- From mdiodati@pingidentity.com Wed Apr 3 13:17:51 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E10F21F8D12 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:17:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFKsYaG0yd+E for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A56321F8D2B for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f200.google.com ([209.85.214.200]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob118.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUVyOa2jVpKQhz0ARWK9RkzWZ+qRCjW6E@postini.com; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:17:50 PDT Received: by mail-ob0-f200.google.com with SMTP id uz6so10150283obc.7 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:from:mime-version:x-mailer:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=RGgapCXLTnzQ7ydwF1qb/wn1HACGHWH8HMUay0QRR8c=; b=pdtTatXXUkOYAHx8T9zbop309OZZjExtD11voKxhM9xIMud+U4jW9ZGyPrqXv3PGog cwh7WYLLU/6bYbBokqMLRhODtuI5mobJLt5MA8yDYcW3KDwlWZQU6xPBSWpiIGpfPAE3 qSyYheBtlXYN9KkEUy5esxi4zqjJI7ZZxFN+AWFPMcfzU9LLYAg4uuZgVKVHMFeACjgQ 0Bny9jpi/V0dgMWopSg4a+R+7BYdEQDzo1J7czjQAWlmMcpgpaYbnNoRX2kp0TFIm+fp h6/OxBLVvKPHNhOPIs+Zu4/IfGs5OinK/0SESCv8QTbAnqI1bps1D/Fhr086jAmfpwjR bn2g== X-Received: by 10.42.155.136 with SMTP id u8mr1781562icw.26.1365020266732; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.155.136 with SMTP id u8mr1781558icw.26.1365020266647; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:17:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Diodati MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: Ac4wp0tZMSZIDcXcR8ybKObOX95fZw== Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:17:45 -0500 Message-ID: <6a56141017b3580893d9f30fc561ed78@mail.gmail.com> To: scim@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e817a1af1e004d97a8c45 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkti6L3aFVfJMn21Q3MDJSsQD7pLMLv24zigkTkjYBKEfJbBXIwoGqel8KXt2olDrLqenTh/BwEmYbRPZCnf0wepxSTq42HsVA8knZWSHLstJVSiJnN/9n90WmstjkAFyCesu52 Subject: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:17:51 -0000 --90e6ba6e817a1af1e004d97a8c45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop? We=92ll scope the interop in the coming weeks. CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let me know =93yes=94 or =93maybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)? Best, Mark Diodati Co-Chair=97Cloud Identity Summit --90e6ba6e817a1af1e004d97a8c45 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,

=A0

We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summ= it (CIS). Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop?

=A0

We=92ll scope the interop= in the coming weeks.

=A0

CIS will be in Napa, CA f= rom July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday J= uly 9 (most likely, it will be the former).

=A0

Thanks so much, and I loo= k forward to hearing from you. Can you please let me know =93yes=94 or =93m= aybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)?

=A0

Best,

=A0

Mark Diodati

<= span style=3D"font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">Co-Cha= ir=97Cloud Identity Summit

--90e6ba6e817a1af1e004d97a8c45-- From hazelton@wisc.edu Wed Apr 3 15:40:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BCC21F902D for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iw22M-0oOz1d for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (wmauth3.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275D21F9012 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) id <0MKP00400AWXW100@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for scim@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:39 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-3, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.4.3.223316, SenderIP=0.0.0.0 Received: from dyn-128-104-18-253.doit.wisc.edu (dyn-128-104-18-253.doit.wisc.edu [128.104.18.253]) by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MKP004BEAZQ2600@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Keith Hazelton Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:22 -0500 Message-id: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> To: scim WG X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" , "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" Subject: [scim] Schema URIs X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:40:41 -0000 I notice that up to now all published SCIM schema URIs are URNs, e.g., urn:scim:schema:core:1.0 We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than URNs to identify our extensions. Is this likely to cause us any problems? It would seem to be spec-conformant. E.g. http://ciferproject.org/schema/ciferRegistry/1.0 --Keith From stpeter@stpeter.im Wed Apr 3 19:21:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74901F0D0B for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNO2oXmT4zAp for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C13B1F0CE0 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D34A240DC2; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:31:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:21:42 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Hazelton References: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" , scim WG , "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:21:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/3/13 4:40 PM, Keith Hazelton wrote: > I notice that up to now all published SCIM schema URIs are URNs, > e.g., urn:scim:schema:core:1.0 I don't see those documented anywhere. Also, a formal URN namespace was never issued for 'scim': https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xml Am I missing something? > We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and > research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather > than URNs to identify our extensions. Is this likely to cause us > any problems? No. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRXOO2AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pmyAP/3RKgDTLmNAYQmvdR5jUoN9c 8meQ69qGOfpxZ3/EIfImJgIRKPdxMmK61AH17QoR6z5oC7lCxKJRjFMdGoW+w/eJ j4r9NBQO3FTOP1nVBYIblj+/ctsJkuc5A0n3TCz5w5zN96Wy3NSOOJJwGcuds6EY hOXlavtiDp/fuEQmgOGcxXbi6DxmAgmfdKuInUITN4kVf9ZoB+wHWdkWboRuSn64 OZGVl63hAcJCaXFZsuXkiVeRoTPepEQ2rgaQAQJNhcttXSx0H30+dXYpvnBWRV3j acyJltJ8rRKGsum9U+zpw40zfrZGRSYvoQOJ7Um83/uiCelp9d+k9DdbUB47OXXf oZyWsDFRgj0927Nsz9vVNahfIrt0sft4MaBlA5Ee6OXjBWZbPYM2H4hd/zbXtcvv /bX7BLzKuJzuozccsrbMbL8CVFbAetBr9aDat/riuS4O4VR4dbb/rUE2n66oWU1Q VJGME3SDycm9ZBxSyP/EWJ4oWFB3qn86BpiOlK3dbN/rl8m96LxtITo/OiefN7+y c1Jv6R7QpS5tJ+1AdiNw3ElGEyoNx0lGpSY1DJv9CA8WqZdcTRhSc+8L7zyvqP49 PArbKNlwB4Utpk1vQ2IvisNUopbSZmYBL3P3kwsxS00Ols+hWHKzVmym11EsbP2T 5egtlexWQN+M7LicDHKc =m0QM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Thu Apr 4 08:56:12 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EE021F8CE8 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3GFNj0IhM4l for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9CB21F8C93 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail212-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.238) by CH1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.43.70.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:10 +0000 Received: from mail212-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail212-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133CB30013A; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -33 X-BigFish: PS-33(zzbb2dI98dI154cP9371I542I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275ch1033IL17326ah8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail212-ch1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail212-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail212-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 136509096670069_8364; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.247]) by mail212-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D417E0047; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (10.43.70.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:04 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:03 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Peter Saint-Andre , Keith Hazelton Thread-Topic: [scim] Schema URIs Thread-Index: AQHOMLxI2cybutQ4aUWSWVQOyu9hfpjFVNEAgADiYQA= Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:02 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7493@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 3B9A66980040A63B9A67E5 x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" , scim WG , "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:56:12 -0000 > Also, a formal URN namespace was never issued for 'scim': ... Am I missin= g something? You're right. This still needs to happen. >> We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and=20 >> research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than=20 >> URNs to identify our extensions. Is this likely to cause us any=20 >> problems? > > No. I don't see any problems with this. In section 4, the schema draft says: "= Each schema extension must identify a URI used to identify the extension." = To me, this means that a URL or URN would be valid. --Kelly -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pet= er Saint-Andre Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 9:22 PM To: Keith Hazelton Cc: cifer-prov@internet2.edu; scim WG; cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/3/13 4:40 PM, Keith Hazelton wrote: > I notice that up to now all published SCIM schema URIs are URNs, e.g.,=20 > urn:scim:schema:core:1.0 I don't see those documented anywhere. Also, a formal URN namespace was nev= er issued for 'scim': https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xml Am I missing something? > We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and=20 > research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than=20 > URNs to identify our extensions. Is this likely to cause us any=20 > problems? No. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRXOO2AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pmyAP/3RKgDTLmNAYQmvdR5jUoN9c 8meQ69qGOfpxZ3/EIfImJgIRKPdxMmK61AH17QoR6z5oC7lCxKJRjFMdGoW+w/eJ j4r9NBQO3FTOP1nVBYIblj+/ctsJkuc5A0n3TCz5w5zN96Wy3NSOOJJwGcuds6EY hOXlavtiDp/fuEQmgOGcxXbi6DxmAgmfdKuInUITN4kVf9ZoB+wHWdkWboRuSn64 OZGVl63hAcJCaXFZsuXkiVeRoTPepEQ2rgaQAQJNhcttXSx0H30+dXYpvnBWRV3j acyJltJ8rRKGsum9U+zpw40zfrZGRSYvoQOJ7Um83/uiCelp9d+k9DdbUB47OXXf oZyWsDFRgj0927Nsz9vVNahfIrt0sft4MaBlA5Ee6OXjBWZbPYM2H4hd/zbXtcvv /bX7BLzKuJzuozccsrbMbL8CVFbAetBr9aDat/riuS4O4VR4dbb/rUE2n66oWU1Q VJGME3SDycm9ZBxSyP/EWJ4oWFB3qn86BpiOlK3dbN/rl8m96LxtITo/OiefN7+y c1Jv6R7QpS5tJ+1AdiNw3ElGEyoNx0lGpSY1DJv9CA8WqZdcTRhSc+8L7zyvqP49 PArbKNlwB4Utpk1vQ2IvisNUopbSZmYBL3P3kwsxS00Ols+hWHKzVmym11EsbP2T 5egtlexWQN+M7LicDHKc =3Dm0QM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From stpeter@stpeter.im Thu Apr 4 09:03:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B2A21F8BA1 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:03:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrD+fh3BH1r7 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968E121F8B15 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (unknown [24.9.168.255]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53A7E40DC2; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:13:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <515DA445.4070605@stpeter.im> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:03:17 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kelly Grizzle References: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im> <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7493@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7493@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" , scim WG , "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" , Keith Hazelton Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:03:24 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/4/13 9:56 AM, Kelly Grizzle wrote: >> Also, a formal URN namespace was never issued for 'scim': ... Am >> I missing something? > > You're right. This still needs to happen. OK. I'm happy to provide some guidance on that -- it's really pretty easy. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3406 and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3406bis-urn-ns-reg/ for information about the process. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRXaREAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pYCEP/0VlOeGFAsp5fRQO1ZCgTduo EeGVZRsyPG+1qEhEpWn/kVd8zWOdG3yj+8HQGBPqtaPMO7lxcdX/IJxPh6K8yaQs m1AYc5DELjMV0Qw+f++T5TE6S1dAlQBGJUTYkXjo6bQpTLpB0ufoyZ/hYYjtL5/g 6w6j49iWy0i2lkV6bWXgV5+o/1Re1qocMvsXYa2dvz0w6acTLacHCoCnWxS58cPf LGLKnBBm4XaTxzrw+lJLd6v0Y0TNhZutXKpZYGFkXQbUaDkNCC12x2xhy5s0BvQy uZYCNy9KJ6xqSr1EnU/HX8tId+2dsGH3wWN8nUQktrvjr+cnTrcyNFLQ5eyEnWwH dYSJt97Ns/9vX3AWxf2qJbdPbzY1Hy8tyaLkLQItNuTQSwyX5fk/d4y3O+2/kI4H vOu0ofLvk6Ulyaa68Y2ARtlYTBPWq5LLVWGmBi2GRBp5K83TvW7t6suUhisCPshj jFCy/Gki80xDyupgMsq8x8EcWz69V96zQuRTtJhwbp3FNFWjgYOCSYo7n4ie4OUK xfX19AYWpAJhekDFCIHVzxAUQK5WKk2x7OvDEr0hpNAJfVwDltl1RzAyvtaOT6EY 0nBd0Df1xQ6HWKzbqQI8lgS1v70zmn+xLLqnR3ax6Q0ObvATJMGHeR/bsvegL+ea e7U1lxbuB2i3bkLOnlO4 =ejNP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bjorn.aannestad@unboundid.com Thu Apr 4 11:10:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18F21F8CF8 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.227 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbFOiv4vE1fI for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-x22a.google.com (mail-ia0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6795121F8CCB for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id h8so2518668iaa.29 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Tjp8jaEmNf1sLTqt8/lvoQABTaTpNQNcozcalW/rXmI=; b=pzDQGa0hy7Uhu6GpyPkmbe9AR1Qyyr4JRT9gE5vz8j57nNmAdHxO95IU2jAuTaosSg ZwBKKODI1u2KQtvbkKo5rXhNxgYqcZX1lC1ps6UxL5VbA0tMD4pMhcKKUXLuxypeeGtZ XaE0KOb7cnKaUmGugl1rT7BZFTHrJ6fLh6mtHcQpWbW1j5bVyhcMUdIvW+DLeaxQ0TN1 ac/4iR3piqzpK2rF2sLCAxpWzqzaD7PUG5vdgPo3BAPUtTODobQY/goOhY2aHKObDrQ6 sBoThZwXiba2I+F5O0Y60wQloFTMLgIq9zI7lTc8qw0/6lH/4V3eiekJPRlYGPJy+1pU p53A== X-Received: by 10.50.237.70 with SMTP id va6mr4528851igc.66.1365099000873; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.8.1.116] (24-155-184-100.static.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.184.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id in10sm3454368igc.1.2013.04.04.11.09.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <515DC1F4.2090804@unboundid.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:09:56 -0500 From: Bjorn Aannestad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim@ietf.org References: <6a56141017b3580893d9f30fc561ed78@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6a56141017b3580893d9f30fc561ed78@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020503050301000503000504" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmayfxXQFWBdQ4DWgNeJ2/7iQQ3coi+bBDBKhCLNpcWD0UneGXneF4CIuaryILUYt7Gfzgy Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:10:02 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020503050301000503000504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate. Looking forward to it! -Bjorn Aannestad On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote: > > Hi All, > > We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). > Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop? > > We'll scope the interop in the coming weeks. > > CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur > on Monday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). > > Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please > let me know "yes" or "maybe" by next Monday (April 8)? > > Best, > > Mark Diodati > > Co-Chair---Cloud Identity Summit > > > > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim --------------020503050301000503000504 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate.  Looking forward to it!

-Bjorn Aannestad


On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote:

Hi All,

 

We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop?

 

We’ll scope the interop in the coming weeks.

 

CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former).

 

Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let me know “yes” or “maybe” by next Monday (April 8)?

 

Best,

 

Mark Diodati

Co-Chair—Cloud Identity Summit



_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

--------------020503050301000503000504-- From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Thu Apr 4 11:18:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2999921F8D1C for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.932 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZeb2Fj7pHeL for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C2E21F8BBB for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail72-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.246) by CH1EHSOBE015.bigfish.com (10.43.70.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:57 +0000 Received: from mail72-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail72-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B09601B3; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -34 X-BigFish: PS-34(zzbb2dI98dI154cP9371I542I1432I1447Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275ch1033IL17326ah8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h93fhd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail72-ch1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail72-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail72-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365099534343356_28011; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS037.bigfish.com (snatpool3.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.225]) by mail72-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4640C2E004C; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CH1EHSMHS037.bigfish.com (10.43.69.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:52 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:51 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Peter Saint-Andre Thread-Topic: [scim] Schema URIs Thread-Index: AQHOMLxI2cybutQ4aUWSWVQOyu9hfpjFVNEAgADiYQCAAAMsgIAAJb7Q Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:18:51 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C784E@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im> <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7493@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <515DA445.4070605@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <515DA445.4070605@stpeter.im> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 3C1D2AA40040AC3C1D2BF1 x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" , scim WG , "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" , Keith Hazelton Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:18:59 -0000 VGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUgcG9pbnRlcnMsIFBldGVyLiAgTWVsaW5kYSBqdXN0IG9wZW5lZCBpc3N1 ZSAjNDEgdG8gYWRkcmVzcyB0aGlzLg0KDQotLUtlbGx5DQoNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNz YWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFBldGVyIFNhaW50LUFuZHJlIFttYWlsdG86c3RwZXRlckBzdHBldGVy LmltXSANClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBBcHJpbCAwNCwgMjAxMyAxMTowMyBBTQ0KVG86IEtlbGx5 IEdyaXp6bGUNCkNjOiBLZWl0aCBIYXplbHRvbjsgY2lmZXItcHJvdkBpbnRlcm5ldDIuZWR1OyBz Y2ltIFdHOyBjaWZlci1hcGlAaW50ZXJuZXQyLmVkdSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTog W3NjaW1dIFNjaGVtYSBVUklzDQoNCi0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQIFNJR05FRCBNRVNTQUdFLS0tLS0N Ckhhc2g6IFNIQTENCg0KT24gNC80LzEzIDk6NTYgQU0sIEtlbGx5IEdyaXp6bGUgd3JvdGU6DQo+ PiBBbHNvLCBhIGZvcm1hbCBVUk4gbmFtZXNwYWNlIHdhcyBuZXZlciBpc3N1ZWQgZm9yICdzY2lt JzogLi4uIEFtIEkgDQo+PiBtaXNzaW5nIHNvbWV0aGluZz8NCj4gDQo+IFlvdSdyZSByaWdodC4g IFRoaXMgc3RpbGwgbmVlZHMgdG8gaGFwcGVuLg0KDQpPSy4gSSdtIGhhcHB5IHRvIHByb3ZpZGUg c29tZSBndWlkYW5jZSBvbiB0aGF0IC0tIGl0J3MgcmVhbGx5IHByZXR0eSBlYXN5LiBTZWUgaHR0 cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL3JmYzM0MDYgYW5kIGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIu aWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtdXJuYmlzLXJmYzM0MDZiaXMtdXJuLW5zLXJlZy8NCmZv ciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhYm91dCB0aGUgcHJvY2Vzcy4NCg0KUGV0ZXINCg0KLSAtLQ0KUGV0ZXIg U2FpbnQtQW5kcmUNCmh0dHBzOi8vc3RwZXRlci5pbS8NCg0KDQotLS0tLUJFR0lOIFBHUCBTSUdO QVRVUkUtLS0tLQ0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcvTWFjR1BHMiB2Mi4wLjE4IChEYXJ3aW4pDQpDb21t ZW50OiBVc2luZyBHbnVQRyB3aXRoIFRodW5kZXJiaXJkIC0gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5lbmlnbWFpbC5u ZXQvDQoNCmlRSWNCQUVCQWdBR0JRSlJYYVJFQUFvSkVPb0dwSkVyeGEycFlDRVAvMFZsT2VHRkFz cDVmUlFPMVpDZ1RkdW8NCkVlR1ZaUnN5UEcrMXFFaEVwV24va1ZkOHpXT2RHM3lqKzhIUUdCUHF0 YVBNTzdseGNkWC9JSnhQaDZLOHlhUXMNCm0xQVljNURFTGpNVjBRdytmKytUNVRFNlMxZEFsUUJH SlVUWWtYam82YlFwVExwQjB1Zm95Wi9oWVlqdEw1L2cNCjZ3Nmo0OWlXeTBpMmxrVjZiV1hnVjUr by8xUmUxcW9jTXZzWFlhMmR2ejB3NmFjVExhY0hDb0NuV3hTNThjUGYNCkxHTEtuQkJtNFhhVHh6 cncrbEpMZDZ2MFkwVE5oWnV0WEtwWllHRmtYUWJVYURrTkNDMTJ4MnhoeTVzMEJ2UXkNCnVaWUNO eTlLSjZ4cVNyMUVuVS9IWDh0SWQrMmRzR0gzd1dOOG5VUWt0cnZqcitjblRyY3lORkxRNWV5RW5X d0gNCmRZU0p0OTdOcy85dlgzQVd4ZjJxSmJkUGJ6WTFIeTh0eWFMa0xRSXROdVRRU3d5WDVmay9k NHkzTysyL2tJNEgNCnZPdTBvZkx2azZVbHlhYTY4WTJBUnRsWVRCUFdxNUxMVldHbUJpMkdSQnA1 SzgzVHZXN3Q2c3VVaGlzQ1BzaGoNCmpGQ3kvR2tpODB4RHl1cGdNc3E4eDhFY1d6NjlWOTZ6UXVS VHRKaHdicDNGTkZXamdZT0NTWW83bjRpZTRPVUsNCnhmWDE5QVlXcEFKaGVrREZDSUhWenhBVVFL NVdLazJ4N092REVyMGhwTkFKZlZ3RGx0bDFSekF5dnRhT1Q2RVkNCjBuQmQwRGYxeFE2SFdLemJx UUk4bGdTMXY3MHptbit4TExxblIzYXg2UTBPYnZBVEpNR0hlUi9ic3ZlZ0wrZWENCmU3VTFseGJ1 QjJpM2JrTE9ubE80DQo9ZWpOUA0KLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQoNCg== From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Thu Apr 4 11:19:47 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6268421F8BC4 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.348 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UrVP03QmorkN for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3095521F8BBC for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail31-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.235) by TX2EHSOBE014.bigfish.com (10.9.40.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:45 +0000 Received: from mail31-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail31-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3198440115; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -29 X-BigFish: PS-29(zz98dI9371I1469K936eIc85fh1415I14ffI2130Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL17326ah18c673h8275bh8275dhz31h2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail31-tx2: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail31-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail31-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1365099583436785_8714; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS038.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.237]) by mail31-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AF0174004C; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by TX2EHSMHS038.bigfish.com (10.9.99.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:43 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.163]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:41 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Bjorn Aannestad , "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Thread-Index: Ac4wp0tZMSZIDcXcR8ybKObOX95fZwAuFFIAAABRqVA= Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:19:41 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <6a56141017b3580893d9f30fc561ed78@mail.gmail.com> <515DC1F4.2090804@unboundid.com> In-Reply-To: <515DC1F4.2090804@unboundid.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 3C1DEBFF0040AC3C1DED4C x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894BLUPRD0412MB643_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:19:47 -0000 --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894BLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You can count SailPoint in! --Kelly From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjo= rn Aannestad Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM To: scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate. Looking forward to it! -Bjorn Aannestad On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote: Hi All, We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone i= nterested in participating in the 1.1 interop? We'll scope the interop in the coming weeks. CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on M= onday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let = me know "yes" or "maybe" by next Monday (April 8)? Best, Mark Diodati Co-Chair-Cloud Identity Summit _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894BLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You can count SailPoin= t in!

 

--Kelly

 

From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.o= rg] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM
To: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

 

Yes, UnboundID will b= e there and will participate.  Looking forward to it!

-Bjorn Aannestad

On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote:

Hi All,

 

We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summ= it (CIS). Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop?

 

We’ll scope the interop in the coming weeks.=

 

CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The inter= op will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be t= he former).

 

Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. C= an you please let me know “yes” or “maybe” by next = Monday (April 8)?

 

Best,

 

Mark Diodati

Co-Chair—Cloud Identity Summit 




_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.iet=
f.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

 

--_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894BLUPRD0412MB643_-- From melinda.shore@gmail.com Thu Apr 4 20:57:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2A221F9697 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:57:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqS3v+6+fb7a for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EA421F9692 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id un15so1799959pbc.12 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iijG3AFZma9NjsKtn/2dN9k8zCia1iGMRBanlApOf+s=; b=DUvqvBZpNradbXHn5yzX9X4jy2shUCXAjV1sV5XeMrUIockI+VW8lfIt3trblElew/ Y1IBgVzi6mV2FxlL6fXhHUey57KEOqoHMopZV8IXmtTmyaxrTDyX14sLoM+qfte0PTD1 Z9/slmnI/kAjUxIE2F4qRSzdk38b1iAQky2YJJ7vbJDyFgZCzKAxc3fkPsreZyZgHKvI zWldL/rt+0CuEO5VECVc8/zgeZ+3s5vbZxzmssjwxg+RW+c09DUTuPbLy/KJmvRE9IN1 wq3oen4KZPfbl4p4BunLCtbtX6jCGJtQ2VdxnVzQScFuMqvWKQziXAadR8BtVysPlTfC ouEA== X-Received: by 10.68.217.165 with SMTP id oz5mr12508518pbc.183.1365134234774; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spandex.local (66-230-112-119-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.112.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wm3sm12678129pbc.4.2013.04.04.20.57.13 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <515E4B97.1080305@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 19:57:11 -0800 From: Melinda Shore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "scim@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [scim] Issue tracker X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:57:15 -0000 scim participants/enthusiasts/followers may not be aware that the working group is using an issue tracker to keep track of technical issues that need to be resolved. Scanning the list of open tickets is an excellent way to get a quick overview of the status of the work and what remains to be done. It's also the first place to check if you feel like you have some cycles to contribute to the working group and would like to develop some text or just start a conversation. The URI for the open tickets is: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/scim/trac/report/1 Melinda From leifj@mnt.se Wed Apr 10 11:26:13 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB07021F8DD6 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.734 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.734 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXPU84Or+z1u for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1506221F8DC9 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id er20so743765lab.28 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=tDGYblGW/pze3HHlVc7NZYCXuYtYRvgNLU1b/fdXmHU=; b=kuj+tvb6s84y9Xj9NFvw3iToo271bki2OWnnjhQtdPXOuHVYtS1dMV/bUb1E6b0hpO PyMnsIVVwXbZGbHNpCa6q966F44lQP40imbFLHHHYTxmLMbl7qSwetj+W4f6876hAoRc ZkHt88Qr4TwAb/XwjA8/+RWSLChla6r9oDUmVT6w3g1I94H41UAxQGq1azuk33P9HwS7 anu8YHskwzUon0J1OnWlpoFGdDSRNzMF9alaG2VD/RB3fnSSAn7LzcuZ2eoPdW8oc5xG XoTy4W69pt7RgV6j4FVLOdMK97puF3tzElXHuMHYdbrQ/0dzC80QBXiwNRSnMElJ2ruI SpjQ== X-Received: by 10.112.154.132 with SMTP id vo4mr1711783lbb.44.1365618371863; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.244] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a9sm374463laf.2.2013.04.10.11.26.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:26:08 +0200 From: Leif Johansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim WG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQt8qcYgmh0C/73qQJ1mJafx+VezoCz+xjHbCX8Qc0YQS1vmriWdPgrG3TYGcF/+6awoLK Subject: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:26:14 -0000 Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree. Leif & Morteza From leifj@mnt.se Wed Apr 10 11:30:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC99021F8F06 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.933, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UweNcJeDAd-y for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A7221F8F12 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p11so857139lbi.0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=7xC1LHTq2l8TZGOoQ61ZQVZgHHl++MSoe+YDPhH+eRo=; b=TgMDKZ9Y+zvymo7FljYxXCQnPhig7YAvqQq9PKVNqM2Y/iFv8FtCRmX4cr8ua+iRO+ tK42Zkwn92Pi2ANbX4P3sA+LVghrj68NsTPuGNpNts9f5RKsp/SnWLur5XMuTw+1ketq veY8YO200kHRIPYCzOddkHURKyJEgW4ZemTq97MLqIuFwc4ruTPvAXJpQ2Xo1XUHDJ9k LidP/fiepGmICabqeu8wn4XOxygoN8R3XlzzlyKKZcuVNToDkgrvmi+xfxIuCRclhv34 R7rIxbDeDnCy/TTKUA+3WzBuEeIGP3izV+KmhLvSl/S0WHXJuQ6Pd1dj8gCvP50dzEF9 hoHA== X-Received: by 10.112.73.103 with SMTP id k7mr1783090lbv.40.1365618637605; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.244] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x9sm534890lbi.15.2013.04.10.11.30.36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:30:35 +0200 From: Leif Johansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim WG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRYgfTDqFJAmxvBYcKTgVMU/RCss9IV/r519K2M71jnDCSQ+qLD1vhrMoW3/QOxXL0TAtw Subject: [scim] issue #29 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:30:40 -0000 Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 29 as suggested in the issue tracker. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree. Leif & Morteza From phil.hunt@oracle.com Wed Apr 10 11:33:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA09221F8F2F for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SumpzFAC+vJ1 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDCD21F8EBD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3AIX7cv011428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:07 GMT Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIX6eX000637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:06 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIX53j000367; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:05 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:05 -0700 References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0C55A9A3-4EC2-4D1E-A316-4DDCBDAE6086@oracle.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Phil Hunt Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:04 -0700 To: Leif Johansson X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:09 -0000 +1 Phil Sent from my phone. On 2013-04-10, at 11:26, Leif Johansson wrote: > > Folks, > > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing > 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. > > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now > if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From phil.hunt@oracle.com Wed Apr 10 11:33:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161BD21F8F2F for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P+LDHW6bjrNt for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F5B21F8F12 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3AIXhUO012030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:44 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIXg1e014464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:43 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIXglQ014458; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:42 -0700 References: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Phil Hunt Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:42 -0700 To: Leif Johansson X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:45 -0000 Phil Sent from my phone. On 2013-04-10, at 11:30, Leif Johansson wrote: > Folks, > > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing > 29 as suggested in the issue tracker. > > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now > if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From leifj@mnt.se Wed Apr 10 11:33:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589F21F8EBD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.466, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x+OiQ-1vaUrs for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA4C21F8F75 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fo12so753335lab.38 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=qDU++a2erRUnhDI2nBWgJgOxRrThDwafv/s17wNzhuI=; b=XCxN/RjptU+SrD/ZbbBUOOKFQidhsntEJhCn/9C4Wi0SaCQJ1rIq5QcbynVEVGLNre CeDlZ2wrss+RVnx4Ra81x0HEShgECcEOlZmadYmjlFITZS3mxf6MwlLgJGzc6aSMFAbw V23E6PKk32Uh8pnKUNmxiUVGkc3z1CQrte7t34uN0DcW/BQc7vSs43kAa2uqwLbWrzwM g8Hg5wdkj8IfO/PF3RPZSxby09+85WWVTVlgtkBoTxcTAjEWM6WXlXhRVJwhOPBxK6Uk GlMN6OtjRUsAQrsMMMNZzrt6z61l9qJBhopqZiKCihHja7cg9F/38HAXxjM0OV2uJaNm KLyg== X-Received: by 10.112.128.135 with SMTP id no7mr1777259lbb.79.1365618827963; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.244] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sl5sm552287lbb.10.2013.04.10.11.33.46 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:33:44 +0200 From: Leif Johansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim WG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWX9rCrEyMNaF1IqYQJkDHv3x0OSxqzsfRFVfoeTXt0l6Y0RAOTHF9squgzpbe25lqMLBG Subject: [scim] issue #28 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:33:50 -0000 Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 28 by including a non-normative text in the spec explaining how multi- tenacy could be implemented. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree. Leif & Morteza From leifj@sunet.se Wed Apr 10 11:35:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF2921F8F75 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPob8oJmBZsz for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e-mailfilter02.sunet.se (e-mailfilter02.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C5521F8F12 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.nordu.net (smtp1.nordu.net [IPv6:2001:948:4:6::32]) by e-mailfilter02.sunet.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r3AIZBDk021988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:35:11 +0200 Received: from kerio.nordu.net (kerio.nordu.net [109.105.110.42]) by smtp1.nordu.net (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3AIZ8OF001663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:11 GMT Received: from [10.0.0.244] ([62.102.145.131]) (authenticated user leifj@nordu.net) by kerio.nordu.net (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for scim@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:35:08 +0200 Message-ID: <5165B0DA.6070202@sunet.se> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:35:06 +0200 From: Leif Johansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim WG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-p0f-Info: os=unknown unknown, link=Ethernet or modem X-CanIt-Geo: ip=109.105.110.42; country=SE; latitude=62.0000; longitude=15.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=62.0000,15.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-nordu-net:outbound (inherits from outbound-nordu-net:default, nordu-net:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0aJmizb2y - ede63b1f83a4 - 20130410 X-Antispam-Training-Forget: https://mailfilter.nordu.net/canit/b.php?i=0aJmizb2y&m=ede63b1f83a4&t=20130410&c=f X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: https://mailfilter.nordu.net/canit/b.php?i=0aJmizb2y&m=ede63b1f83a4&t=20130410&c=n X-Antispam-Training-Spam: https://mailfilter.nordu.net/canit/b.php?i=0aJmizb2y&m=ede63b1f83a4&t=20130410&c=s X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) Subject: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:16 -0000 Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 33 as suggested in the issue tracker. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree. Leif & Morteza From phil.hunt@oracle.com Wed Apr 10 11:35:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E8C21F8FCF for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DX0XPz2WdT5k for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1192B21F8FC7 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3AIZN2C000786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:26 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIZMFB005965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:23 GMT Received: from abhmt104.oracle.com (abhmt104.oracle.com [141.146.116.56]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIZMMg018573; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:22 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:22 -0700 References: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2C02D130-A427-4288-A337-89E716D0B38D@oracle.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Phil Hunt Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:22 -0700 To: Leif Johansson X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:27 -0000 Sorry meant to say i agree with the call in Orlando. Phil Sent from my phone. On 2013-04-10, at 11:30, Leif Johansson wrote: > Folks, > > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing > 29 as suggested in the issue tracker. > > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now > if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From tonynad@microsoft.com Wed Apr 10 12:41:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0889321F9350 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:41:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54JSqHrlYcAn for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0204.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4F621F9349 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2FFO11FD017.protection.gbl (10.173.161.202) by BL2FFO11HUB034.protection.gbl (10.173.161.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:41:48 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:41:47 +0000 Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.113) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:41:34 +0000 Received: from mail176-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.236) by CH1EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.43.70.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:00 +0000 Received: from mail176-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail176-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6207E3801FD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -18 X-BigFish: PS-18(zz98dI9371I936eI542I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah17ej9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail176-ch1: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB042; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en; Received: from mail176-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail176-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365622798304006_26073; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.245]) by mail176-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E04EC0045; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by CH1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.43.70.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:54 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) by BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:53 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:52 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:51 +0000 From: Anthony Nadalin To: Phil Hunt , Leif Johansson Thread-Topic: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call Thread-Index: AQHONhkWYUGVGT17MkmPRU5buPGme5jPx3oAgAASouA= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:39:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> <0C55A9A3-4EC2-4D1E-A316-4DDCBDAE6086@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <0C55A9A3-4EC2-4D1E-A316-4DDCBDAE6086@oracle.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%ORACLE.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(51704002)(24454001)(377424002)(13464002)(377454001)(199002)(4396001)(44976002)(50986001)(16676001)(79102001)(74502001)(6806001)(77982001)(49866001)(74662001)(80022001)(65816001)(63696002)(56776001)(53806001)(51856001)(33646001)(46406002)(5343655001)(69226001)(56816002)(76482001)(54316002)(23726001)(50466001)(54356001)(81342001)(20776003)(46102001)(47736001)(81542001)(47976001)(47446002)(47776003)(59766001)(31966008)(42262001)(3826001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB034; H:TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267 Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:41:50 -0000 +1 -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phi= l Hunt Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:33 AM To: Leif Johansson Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call +1 Phil Sent from my phone. On 2013-04-10, at 11:26, Leif Johansson wrote: >=20 > Folks, >=20 > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for=20 > closing > 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. >=20 > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up=20 > now if you disagree. >=20 > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From tonynad@microsoft.com Wed Apr 10 12:42:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87E721F9019 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:42:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4ySU1Uytubq for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0239.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.239]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBED21F9015 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2FFO11FD016.protection.gbl (10.173.161.200) by BL2FFO11HUB011.protection.gbl (10.173.161.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:42:47 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14HUBC105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD016.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.160.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:42:47 +0000 Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.81) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:42:10 +0000 Received: from mail84-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.242) by CH1EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.43.70.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:23 +0000 Received: from mail84-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail84-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF23320072 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -38 X-BigFish: PS-38(z21aILz98dI9371I936eI542I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah17ej9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail84-ch1: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB042; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en; Received: from mail84-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail84-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365622820667899_5220; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.231]) by mail84-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8E16004A; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by CH1EHSMHS036.bigfish.com (10.43.69.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:17 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) by BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:16 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:14 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:14 +0000 From: Anthony Nadalin To: Phil Hunt , Leif Johansson Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #29 consensus call Thread-Index: AQHONhnNCDy3MiRD/EqljG/O//vsSZjPyB0AgAASGQA= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:13 +0000 Message-ID: <7fa16c223a27497d882674b5b79664fa@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> <2C02D130-A427-4288-A337-89E716D0B38D@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <2C02D130-A427-4288-A337-89E716D0B38D@oracle.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%ORACLE.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(199002)(189002)(51704002)(377424002)(377454001)(13464002)(5383001)(24454001)(20776003)(5343655001)(46102001)(44976002)(74662001)(69226001)(54316002)(49866001)(56776001)(81342001)(77982001)(16676001)(47776003)(6806001)(76482001)(53806001)(59766001)(65816001)(46406002)(47736001)(63696002)(50986001)(31966008)(47976001)(33646001)(81542001)(23726001)(56816002)(74502001)(79102001)(54356001)(51856001)(80022001)(50466001)(47446002)(4396001)(42262001)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB011; H:TK5EX14HUBC105.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267 Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:42:50 -0000 +1 -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phi= l Hunt Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:35 AM To: Leif Johansson Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call Sorry meant to say i agree with the call in Orlando.=20 Phil Sent from my phone. On 2013-04-10, at 11:30, Leif Johansson wrote: > Folks, >=20 > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for=20 > closing > 29 as suggested in the issue tracker. >=20 > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up=20 > now if you disagree. >=20 > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From phil.hunt@oracle.com Wed Apr 10 12:44:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F2221F9019 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gTn9TWghH0I6 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B62321F9015 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3AJiYGM026006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AJiXY5016555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:33 GMT Received: from abhmt117.oracle.com (abhmt117.oracle.com [141.146.116.69]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AJiXas016546; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:33 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.14] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:33 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Phil Hunt In-Reply-To: <5165B0DA.6070202@sunet.se> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:43:07 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <903C068A-900E-4EFF-82A0-19C97DDB82BD@oracle.com> References: <5165B0DA.6070202@sunet.se> To: Leif Johansson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:48 -0000 I agree with the consensus. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com On 2013-04-10, at 11:35 AM, Leif Johansson wrote: > Folks, > > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing > 33 as suggested in the issue tracker. > > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now > if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From tonynad@microsoft.com Wed Apr 10 14:02:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FD721F8AAA for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-hqUUk5ti7X for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0236.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DDB21F87CB for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BN1BFFO11FD026.protection.gbl (10.58.52.203) by BN1BFFO11HUB013.protection.gbl (10.58.53.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:02:27 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14HUBC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BN1BFFO11FD026.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:53 +0000 Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.113) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:37 +0000 Received: from mail66-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.228) by CH1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.43.70.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:01 +0000 Received: from mail66-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail66-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55D42001B2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -38 X-BigFish: PS-38(z21aILz98dI9371I936eI542I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL18602eh8275bh8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah17ej9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail66-ch1: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB044; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en; Received: from mail66-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail66-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365627659445573_23292; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.232]) by mail66-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604C84E0053; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by CH1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.43.70.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:59 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB044.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.148) by BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:55 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB044.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:53 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:53 +0000 From: Anthony Nadalin To: Phil Hunt , Leif Johansson Thread-Topic: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call Thread-Index: AQHONhpCsnW7Jy8SfkqoahqElGt4IZjP2wqAgAAVtGA= Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:00:52 +0000 Message-ID: <73fb732aa9514b66951e6a177a9621e5@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <5165B0DA.6070202@sunet.se> <903C068A-900E-4EFF-82A0-19C97DDB82BD@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <903C068A-900E-4EFF-82A0-19C97DDB82BD@oracle.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB044.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%SUNET.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%ORACLE.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(24454001)(5383001)(51704002)(189002)(199002)(13464002)(377424002)(377454001)(47976001)(80022001)(5343655001)(77982001)(54316002)(20776003)(81342001)(50466001)(49866001)(74502001)(69226001)(6806001)(76482001)(53806001)(47446002)(4396001)(65816001)(47736001)(51856001)(46102001)(56776001)(79102001)(23726001)(31966008)(56816002)(15974865001)(59766001)(5343635001)(50986001)(81542001)(16676001)(54356001)(63696002)(46406002)(47776003)(74662001)(33646001)(42262001)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1BFFO11HUB013; H:TK5EX14HUBC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267 Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:02:02 -0000 +1 -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phi= l Hunt Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:43 PM To: Leif Johansson Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call I agree with the consensus. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com On 2013-04-10, at 11:35 AM, Leif Johansson wrote: > Folks, >=20 > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for=20 > closing > 33 as suggested in the issue tracker. >=20 > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up=20 > now if you disagree. >=20 > Leif & Morteza >=20 > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From tonynad@microsoft.com Wed Apr 10 14:03:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40B721F8B0C for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeBCKQWfaDjn for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0211.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F221F8ACD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl (10.173.161.200) by BL2FFO11HUB010.protection.gbl (10.173.161.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:23 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD023.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:23 +0000 Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.81) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:05 +0000 Received: from mail71-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.246) by VA3EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.7.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:15 +0000 Received: from mail71-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59404300A9D for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -35 X-BigFish: PS-35(z21aILz9371I542Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah17ej9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail71-va3: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB042; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en; Received: from mail71-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 136562767325468_31257; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.235]) by mail71-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F322D10009A; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (10.7.99.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:11 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) by BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:08 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:06 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:06 +0000 From: Anthony Nadalin To: Leif Johansson , scim WG Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #28 consensus call Thread-Index: AQHONhoQ143okI8WGU+u7V5z1EAD4JjP8M0Q Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se> In-Reply-To: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(199002)(13464002)(5383001)(377454001)(5343655001)(79102001)(31966008)(33646001)(69226001)(46102001)(50986001)(77982001)(53806001)(56816002)(80022001)(16676001)(56776001)(76482001)(46406002)(6806001)(74502001)(20776003)(47976001)(49866001)(81542001)(74662001)(47446002)(63696002)(23726001)(44976002)(81342001)(47736001)(4396001)(54356001)(54316002)(65816001)(51856001)(59766001)(47776003)(50466001)(42262001)(3826001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB010; H:TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267 Subject: Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:25 -0000 +1 -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lei= f Johansson Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:34 AM To: scim WG Subject: [scim] issue #28 consensus call Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 28 by including a non-normative text in the spec explaining how multi- tena= cy could be implemented. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now = if you disagree. Leif & Morteza _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From moransar@cisco.com Wed Apr 10 16:07:28 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E23D21F87E0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:07:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KsP2o3YJp+9B for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:07:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A5221F89DE for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:07:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9709; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365635246; x=1366844846; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KOxZQrUXUrOSkNsrxzPaDJuQ9h1iPJNbvupJrE+glyA=; b=UUeLz0PZuW2qigZM8KlT4RT25rz9Lma5Oiqq37E13K8g9n9x40mSjl72 /Qt6PiWA+WCabksXw3WPAteMzm4/gO65yRSgiELsE0l1S6nraEINO/C7C Si2BJBTRdSoAK6pMMOpvxcH7QF78U15vpPs6BPdR7mw+f5wLMpFen6gRH U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFACvwZVGtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABHCYJCRDbBRIENFnSCHwEBAQQBAQEqQR0BCBEDAQEBCx0uCxQJCAEBBAESCIgMDL8mBI1bgQogBgcKAYJgYQOoDoMLgig X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,450,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217";a="194416415" Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2013 23:07:17 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3AN7G9L010046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:07:16 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.173]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:07:16 -0500 From: "Morteza Ansari (moransar)" To: Kelly Grizzle , Bjorn Aannestad , "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Thread-Index: Ac4wp0tZMSZIDcXcR8ybKObOX95fZwA4jogAAABXLIABKSHPAA== Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:07:16 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 x-originating-ip: [10.21.68.89] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32866F7EExmbrcdx08ciscoc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:07:28 -0000 --_000_CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32866F7EExmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cisco will also join in. Cheers, Morteza From: Kelly Grizzle > Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:19 AM To: Bjorn Aannestad >, "scim@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit You can count SailPoint in! --Kelly From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM To: scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate. Looking forward to it! -Bjorn Aannestad On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote: Hi All, We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone i= nterested in participating in the 1.1 interop? We=92ll scope the interop in the coming weeks. CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on M= onday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let = me know =93yes=94 or =93maybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)? Best, Mark Diodati Co-Chair=97Cloud Identity Summit _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim --_000_CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32866F7EExmbrcdx08ciscoc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <8C9365976CA6E34E9420FAB872EB3776@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cisco will also join in.


Cheers,
Morteza

From: Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:19= AM
To: Bjorn Aannestad <bjorn.aannestad@unboundid.com>= , "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Intero= p at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

You can count SailPoin= t in!

 

--Kelly

 

From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM
To: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

 

Yes, UnboundID will b= e there and will participate.  Looking forward to it!

-Bjorn Aannestad

On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote:

Hi= All,

&n= bsp;

We= want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone int= erested in participating in the 1.1 interop?

&n= bsp;

We= =92ll scope the interop in the coming weeks.

&n= bsp;

CI= S will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on Mon= day July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former).

&n= bsp;

Th= anks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let me= know =93yes=94 or =93maybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)?<= /p>

&n= bsp;

Be= st,

&n= bsp;

Ma= rk Diodati

Co= -Chair=97Cloud Identity Summit




_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.iet=
f.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

 

 --_000_CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32866F7EExmbrcdx08ciscoc_-- From tonynad@microsoft.com Wed Apr 10 16:13:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D1421F8AE3 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:13:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWvcLXm1GgBh for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0204.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138B121F8AD8 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2FFO11FD002.protection.gbl (10.1.15.203) by BY2FFO11HUB033.protection.gbl (10.1.14.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:12:26 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD002.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:12:59 +0000 Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.81) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.7.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:12:25 +0000 Received: from mail10-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.242) by AM1EHSOBE015.bigfish.com (10.3.207.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:11 +0000 Received: from mail10-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail10-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94666220160 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: PS-22(zz98dI9371I1469K936eIc85fh1415I14ffI2130Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL17326ah18c673h8275bh8275dhz31h2a8h668h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1bceh17ej9a9j1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail10-am1: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB043; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en; Received: from mail10-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail10-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365635410365025_13162; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.234]) by mail10-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFFE1C00A0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by AM1EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (10.3.207.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:10 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB043.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.147) by BL2PRD0310HT001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:09 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB043.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:07 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:07 +0000 From: Anthony Nadalin To: "Morteza Ansari (moransar)" , Kelly Grizzle , Bjorn Aannestad , "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Thread-Index: Ac4wp0tZMSZIDcXcR8ybKObOX95fZwAuFFIAAABRqVABN9BUAAAAC8mg Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:10:06 +0000 Message-ID: <06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884BY2PR03MB041namprd03pro_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB043.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-FOPE-CRA-Verdict: 157.56.240.21$sailpoint.com%0%1%duplicatedomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com%False%False%0$ X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%UNBOUNDID.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%CISCO.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%SAILPOINT.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn% X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(51414002)(52254001)(189002)(84964001)(199002)(24454001)(377454001)(377424002)(33646001)(46102001)(47736001)(20776003)(4396001)(77982001)(15202345001)(16236675001)(74662001)(76482001)(54316002)(69226001)(56816002)(56776001)(80022001)(6806001)(5343655001)(564824004)(59766001)(54356001)(47976001)(50986001)(71186001)(47446002)(51856001)(31966008)(49866001)(74502001)(65816001)(79102001)(512954001)(81342001)(53806001)(63696002)(81542001)(44976002)(5343635001)(18276755001)(18277545001)(16676001)(42262001)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB033; H:TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267 Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:13:37 -0000 --_000_06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884BY2PR03MB041namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The details are pretty vague and would have to understand the scenarios and= the IPR (if any) before we would commit to be there From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mor= teza Ansari (moransar) Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:07 PM To: Kelly Grizzle; Bjorn Aannestad; scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Cisco will also join in. Cheers, Morteza From: Kelly Grizzle > Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:19 AM To: Bjorn Aannestad >, "scim@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit You can count SailPoint in! --Kelly From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM To: scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate. Looking forward to it! -Bjorn Aannestad On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote: Hi All, We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone i= nterested in participating in the 1.1 interop? We'll scope the interop in the coming weeks. CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on M= onday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let = me know "yes" or "maybe" by next Monday (April 8)? Best, Mark Diodati Co-Chair-Cloud Identity Summit _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim --_000_06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884BY2PR03MB041namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The details are pretty= vague and would have to understand the scenarios and the IPR (if any) befo= re we would commit to be there

 

From:= scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounce= s@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Morteza Ansari (moransar)
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:07 PM
To: Kelly Grizzle; Bjorn Aannestad; scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

 

Cisco will also joi= n in.

 

 

Cheers,<= /span>

Morteza<= /span>

 

From: Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:19 AM
To: Bjorn Aannestad <bjorn.aannestad@unboundid.com>, "scim@ietf.org" <scim@i= etf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

 

You can count SailPoin= t in!

 

--Kelly

 

From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM
To: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit

 

Yes, UnboundID will b= e there and will participate.  Looking forward to it!

-Bjorn Aannestad


On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote:

Hi All,

 

We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summ= it (CIS). Anyone interested in participating in the 1.1 interop?

 

We’ll scope the interop in the coming weeks.=

 

CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The inter= op will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be t= he former).

 

Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. C= an you please let me know “yes” or “maybe” by next = Monday (April 8)?

 

Best,

 

Mark Diodati

Co-Chair—Cloud Identity Summit 





_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.iet=
f.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

 

--_000_06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884BY2PR03MB041namprd03pro_-- From Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca Wed Apr 10 18:16:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB48121F8A6B for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBMbRI2uZqaN for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.canarie.ca (mail.canarie.ca [205.189.33.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325B321F8A69 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d]) by RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d%10]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:16:13 -0400 From: Chris Phillips To: scim WG Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:16:07 -0400 Thread-Topic: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call Thread-Index: Ac42UieTVAhvRY/2Skid3aVCynNxlQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:16:14 -0000 I agree with the consensus call for closing as suggested in the issue tracker. C. On 13-04-10 2:26 PM, "Leif Johansson" wrote: > >Folks, > >At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >25 as suggested in the issue tracker. > >This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now >if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza >_______________________________________________ >scim mailing list >scim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca Wed Apr 10 18:38:51 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AE621F8ADC for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:38:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4R4v+MO7pFdb for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.canarie.ca (mail.canarie.ca [205.189.33.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6313221F8AD1 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d]) by RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d%10]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:38:49 -0400 From: Chris Phillips To: scim WG Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:38:41 -0400 Thread-Topic: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call Thread-Index: Ac42VVCCnxC8apg5T5CWYqejCv8OTQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5165B0DA.6070202@sunet.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [scim] Issue #33 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:38:51 -0000 I agree with the consensus call for closing #33 as suggested in the issue tracker. C. On 13-04-10 2:35 PM, "Leif Johansson" wrote: >Folks, > >At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >33 as suggested in the issue tracker. > >This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now >if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > >_______________________________________________ >scim mailing list >scim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca Wed Apr 10 18:53:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA321F8ACD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:53:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nmZ+cdOugu2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.canarie.ca (mail.canarie.ca [205.189.33.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCC521F8AC2 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d]) by RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d%10]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:53:31 -0400 From: Chris Phillips To: scim WG Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:53:25 -0400 Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #29 consensus call Thread-Index: Ac42V14cMbwtdqdqQA6mUPM+iY2d4A== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:53:32 -0000 I agree with the consensus call for closing #29 as suggested in the issue tracker. C. On 13-04-10 2:30 PM, "Leif Johansson" wrote: >Folks, > >At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >29 as suggested in the issue tracker. > >This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now >if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza >_______________________________________________ >scim mailing list >scim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca Wed Apr 10 18:54:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C1F21F8AE6 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fduHW8fVh5NX for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.canarie.ca (mail.canarie.ca [205.189.33.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EA121F8AB0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d]) by RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d%10]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:54:01 -0400 From: Chris Phillips To: scim WG Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:53:53 -0400 Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #28 consensus call Thread-Index: Ac42V3ArPMTJ2L+JTvaAZsEFADmTyg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:54:02 -0000 I agree with the consensus call for closing #28 as suggested in the issue tracker. C. On 13-04-10 2:33 PM, "Leif Johansson" wrote: > >Folks, > >At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >28 by including a non-normative text in the spec explaining how multi- >tenacy could be implemented. > >This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now >if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza >_______________________________________________ >scim mailing list >scim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Thu Apr 11 09:08:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6984721F8F4A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:08:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UNU6AoXiGeLz for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F20321F8F2F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail209-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.234) by CH1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.43.70.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:43 +0000 Received: from mail209-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail209-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A6C4011B; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371I542Idb82hzz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail209-ch1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail209-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail209-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1365696521110238_13413; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (snatpool3.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.229]) by mail209-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED4C200AE; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CH1EHSMHS035.bigfish.com (10.43.70.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:41 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.164]) with mapi id 14.16.0293.003; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:40 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Leif Johansson , scim WG Thread-Topic: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call Thread-Index: AQHONhkMxNSv3A4Oik+T4RL0GMuFOZjRMIbw Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:39 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3CE9D3@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> In-Reply-To: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 102616DE0041581026182B x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:08:45 -0000 I agree with everything in the proposal except for one thing: Queries MAY be performed against a SCIM: Resource (e.g. /Users/{userid}), Resource Type endpoint (e.g. /Users or /Groups), or Server Root (e.g. /). IMO querying against the server root should be optional and that SP's shoul= d declare support in ServiceProviderConfig. For directory-backed datastore= s, this will be easy to support. However, if the SP is using a relational = database backed datastore, this could be difficult to implement in a way th= at scales. --Kelly -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lei= f Johansson Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:26 PM To: scim WG Subject: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call Folks, At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now = if you disagree. Leif & Morteza _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From leifj@mnt.se Thu Apr 11 09:19:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AC221F91BC for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.045 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.045 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.311, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BP6E8udO1-a9 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C77521F8D00 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr10so1671980lab.17 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=HFosFFtLWmWUQ2qXUGQ0srMDqfiyq5XJsCQan0BtVHI=; b=OfrfefgxIUyfEYMDDKxP7cvFbGAIDxBht2vsfLDi6UPPQbypiO6RPEtANohdYMLGqg 0+3DfvJO2O/4N1Ww5Drp4mNASkW4VF2UTYsZPyyxsrLa9R2fwWGrdJQ2ABRW6cPJB5m/ lLJrvQ9bd521DYlo+sCusuJ75X4Nvm7BAalZphmzOeSmrmYsLMWoH6cBlM6NuYAkGzsj 1Ej28mLHRGq8KtuDVWcm5CmzT/zleI9RxgJ85HVttvRWzf53xXmhS9KFAw+kL0+Qwuf+ ceo+7KCEbcBJV3nim9DTVAxRR8gevAr2dQeEv7ZoEqHeaPJquIssBsyQY3gDReT1LbDr oBhg== X-Received: by 10.152.111.67 with SMTP id ig3mr3546919lab.41.1365697183216; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.244] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xx3sm1946004lbb.14.2013.04.11.09.19.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5166E29B.5010804@mnt.se> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:19:39 +0200 From: Leif Johansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kelly Grizzle References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3CE9D3@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3CE9D3@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlglHNaiXhFOuZsVkPmm5YgNEYxz8UkC1cCaodP/3ob1AicVONbQtE71+7IhSF/ELs7BqCI Cc: scim WG Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:19:45 -0000 On 04/11/2013 06:08 PM, Kelly Grizzle wrote: > I agree with everything in the proposal except for one thing: > > Queries MAY be performed against a SCIM: > > Resource (e.g. /Users/{userid}), > Resource Type endpoint (e.g. /Users or /Groups), or > Server Root (e.g. /). > > > IMO querying against the server root should be optional and that SP's should declare support in ServiceProviderConfig. For directory-backed datastores, this will be easy to support. However, if the SP is using a relational database backed datastore, this could be difficult to implement in a way that scales. I suggest you update the ticket so that the proposal is clear - I believe this was already covered in Orlando though. > > --Kelly > > -----Original Message----- > From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:26 PM > To: scim WG > Subject: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call > > > Folks, > > At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing > 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. > > This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim > > From phil.hunt@oracle.com Thu Apr 11 09:29:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4144121F8550 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ormb+cHvVJG9 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CA721F852A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3BGTaZM027014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:37 GMT Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3BGTZ8b020127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:35 GMT Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3BGTZ7A020114; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:35 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:34 -0700 References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3CE9D3@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5166E29B.5010804@mnt.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5166E29B.5010804@mnt.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <750BC2F0-E826-488D-83CA-94739339B1E9@oracle.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Phil Hunt Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:32 -0700 To: Leif Johansson X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Cc: scim WG , Kelly Grizzle Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:40 -0000 Yes, I presented root search as optional. In the particular section below I w= as attempting to make clear what are now valid queries. However it missed th= e issue of whether the server supports it.=20 Phil On 2013-04-11, at 9:19, Leif Johansson wrote: > On 04/11/2013 06:08 PM, Kelly Grizzle wrote: >> I agree with everything in the proposal except for one thing: >>=20 >> Queries MAY be performed against a SCIM: >> >> Resource (e.g. /Users/{userid}), >> Resource Type endpoint (e.g. /Users or /Groups), or >> Server Root (e.g. /). >> >>=20 >> IMO querying against the server root should be optional and that SP's sho= uld declare support in ServiceProviderConfig. For directory-backed datastor= es, this will be easy to support. However, if the SP is using a relational d= atabase backed datastore, this could be difficult to implement in a way that= scales. > I suggest you update the ticket so that the proposal is clear - I > believe this was > already covered in Orlando though. >>=20 >> --Kelly >>=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of L= eif Johansson >> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:26 PM >> To: scim WG >> Subject: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call >>=20 >>=20 >> Folks, >>=20 >> At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >> 25 as suggested in the issue tracker. >>=20 >> This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up no= w if you disagree. >>=20 >> Leif & Morteza >> _______________________________________________ >> scim mailing list >> scim@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim >=20 > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From prvs=28144957FF=erik.wahlstrom@nexussafe.com Fri Apr 12 04:58:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDE221F86E8 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:58:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHXvijgFxqHz for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MailEdge.nexussafe.com (mailedge.nexussafe.com [83.241.133.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C94621F86E6 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MARVMAILCAS.technxs.com (10.75.28.35) by MailEdge.nexussafe.com (83.241.133.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:59:12 +0200 Received: from MARVMAILDB.technxs.com ([fe80::58d4:bcd0:1e39:89d0]) by MarvMailCAS.technxs.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:58:50 +0200 From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=F6m?= To: "scim@ietf.org WG" Thread-Topic: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Thread-Index: Ac4wp0tZMSZIDcXcR8ybKObOX95fZwAp43AAAABXLIABN8rRAAAAGVUAAE0jBQA= Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:58:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7894@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <06e5236fdde4461ebfb4839280437884@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.75.28.12] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EE29806CEB4048D198309C20FCD5C0D1nexussafecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Anthony Nadalin , "Morteza Ansari \(moransar\)" , Kelly Grizzle Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:58:55 -0000 --_000_EE29806CEB4048D198309C20FCD5C0D1nexussafecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would appreciate if it would be possible to participate remotely. Not as ea= sy as being on site, but if some servers are public we at Technology Nexus = can always fire away some Resources. / Erik On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: The details are pretty vague and would have to understand the scenarios and= the IPR (if any) before we would commit to be there From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Morteza Ansari (moransar) Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:07 PM To: Kelly Grizzle; Bjorn Aannestad; scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Cisco will also join in. Cheers, Morteza From: Kelly Grizzle > Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:19 AM To: Bjorn Aannestad >, "scim@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit You can count SailPoint in! --Kelly From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aannestad Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:10 PM To: scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate. Looking forward to it! -Bjorn Aannestad On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote: Hi All, We want to highlight SCIM at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone i= nterested in participating in the 1.1 interop? We=92ll scope the interop in the coming weeks. CIS will be in Napa, CA from July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on M= onday July 8 or Tuesday July 9 (most likely, it will be the former). Thanks so much, and I look forward to hearing from you. Can you please let = me know =93yes=94 or =93maybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)? Best, Mark Diodati Co-Chair=97Cloud Identity Summit _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim --_000_EE29806CEB4048D198309C20FCD5C0D1nexussafecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <548CD085A1464242B4D6C7C1C49EDBAB@nexussafe.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would appreciate if it would be possible to participate remotely. Not as ea= sy as being on site, but if some servers are public we at Technology Nexus = can always fire away some Resources.
/ Erik


On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:

The details are pretty vague and = would have to understand the scenarios and the IPR (if any) before we would= commit to be there
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org&= nbsp;[mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Morteza An= sari (moransar)
Sent: Wednesday, A= pril 10, 2013 4:07 PM
To: Kelly Grizzle;= Bjorn Aannestad;  Re: [scim= ] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit
 
Cisco will also join in.
 
 
Cheers,
Morteza
 
From: Kelly Grizzl= e <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
Date: Thursday, Ap= ril 4, 2013 11:19 AM
To: Bjorn Aannesta= d <bjorn.aannestad@unboundid.com>, &quo= t;scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim= ] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit
 
You can count SailPoint in!
 
--Kelly
 
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@= ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Aann= estad
Sent: Thursday, Ap= ril 04, 2013 1:10 PM
To: scim= @ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim= ] SCIM 1.1 Interop at 2013 Cloud Identity Summit
 

Yes, UnboundID will be there and will participate.  Looking forward to= it!

-Bjorn Aannestad


On 2013-04-03 3:17 PM, Mark Diodati wrote:
Hi All,=
 <= /div>
We want to highlight SCIM= at the 2013 Cloud Identity Summit (CIS). Anyone interested in participatin= g in the 1.1 interop?
 <= /div>
We=92ll scope the interop= in the coming weeks.
 <= /div>
CIS will be in Napa, CA f= rom July 8 to July 12. The interop will occur on Monday July 8 or Tuesday J= uly 9 (most likely, it will be the former).
 <= /div>
Thanks so much, and I loo= k forward to hearing from you. Can you please let me know =93yes=94 or =93m= aybe=94 by next Monday (April 8)?
 <= /div>
Best,
 <= /div>
Mark Diodati<= /o:p>
Co-Chair=97Cloud Identity= Summit



_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/s=
cim
&n= bsp;
_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim<= /a>

--_000_EE29806CEB4048D198309C20FCD5C0D1nexussafecom_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Apr 15 13:56:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1165521F93F8; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.287 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.313, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZLS+MDvG0Xq; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EFD21F93DF; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.43.p4 Message-ID: <20130415205607.12647.44750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:07 -0700 Cc: scim@ietf.org Subject: [scim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:56:08 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the System for Cross-domain Identity Manageme= nt Working Group of the IETF. Title : System for Cross-Domain Identity Management:Protocol Author(s) : Trey Drake Chuck Mortimore Morteza Ansari Kelly Grizzle Erik Wahlstroem Filename : draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt Pages : 53 Date : 2013-04-15 Abstract: The System for Cross-Domain Identity Management (SCIM) specification is designed to make managing user identity in cloud based applications and services easier. The specification suite seeks to build upon experience with existing schemas and deployments, placing specific emphasis on simplicity of development and integration, while applying existing authentication, authorization, and privacy models. It's intent is to reduce the cost and complexity of user management operations by providing a common user schema and extension model, as well as binding documents to provide patterns for exchanging this schema using standard protocols. In essence, make it fast, cheap, and easy to move users in to, out of, and around the cloud. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scim-api There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-scim-api-01 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Apr 15 13:56:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D099921F94F8; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.305 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.295, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u8-6mGmOkF7K; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062021F94C3; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.43.p4 Message-ID: <20130415205632.12647.97050.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:32 -0700 Cc: scim@ietf.org Subject: [scim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-01.txt X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:56:33 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the System for Cross-domain Identity Manageme= nt Working Group of the IETF. Title : System for Cross-Domain Identity Management: Core Schema Author(s) : Chuck Mortimore Patrick Harding Paul Madsen Trey Drake Filename : draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-01.txt Pages : 34 Date : 2013-04-15 Abstract: The System for Cross-Domain Identity Management (SCIM) specification is designed to make managing user identity in cloud based applications and services easier. The specification suite builds upon experience with existing schemas and deployments, placing specific emphasis on simplicity of development and integration, while applying existing authentication, authorization, and privacy models. Its intent is to reduce the cost and complexity of user management operations by providing a common user schema and extension model, as well as binding documents to provide patterns for exchanging this schema using standard protocols. In essence, make it fast, cheap, and easy to move identity in to, out of, and around the cloud. This document provides a platform neutral schema and extension model for representing users and groups in JSON format. This schema is intended for exchange and use with cloud service providers. Additional binding documents provide a standard REST API, SAML binding, and use cases. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-scim-core-schema-01 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Tue Apr 16 06:22:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF1F21F96FB for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:22:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgOOk-WHo+MO for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E521F96F5 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail74-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.246) by AM1EHSOBE018.bigfish.com (10.3.207.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:22:02 +0000 Received: from mail74-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail74-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625FD3E0604 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:22:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -20 X-BigFish: PS-20(z5002lz9371I936eI542I4015Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL17326ah8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail74-am1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail74-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail74-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1366118519973021_5413; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.253]) by mail74-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20E12E004B for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by AM1EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.3.207.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:21:59 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.25]) by BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.163]) with mapi id 14.16.0293.003; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:21:53 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt Thread-Index: Ac46pJ8Tf+I3RepkSYOt3EXL+7IQBA== Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:21:53 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3DF867@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 294D3FC6004208294D4113 x-originating-ip: [72.182.10.254] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:22:22 -0000 New schema and API drafts have been uploaded. These contain the following = changes: Issue #25: Add ability to retrieve a resource without including the type in= the URL Issue #27: Remove support for XML Issue #28: Clarify the spec on multi-tenancy Issue #29: Support for Non-URL Based Search Issue #33: Formalize support for references in the schema Please review the drafts and send any comments to the list. =20 Thanks, --Kelly -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of int= ernet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:56 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: scim@ietf.org Subject: [scim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the System for Cross-domain Identity Manageme= nt Working Group of the IETF. Title : System for Cross-Domain Identity Management:Protocol Author(s) : Trey Drake Chuck Mortimore Morteza Ansari Kelly Grizzle Erik Wahlstroem Filename : draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt Pages : 53 Date : 2013-04-15 Abstract: The System for Cross-Domain Identity Management (SCIM) specification is designed to make managing user identity in cloud based applications and services easier. The specification suite seeks to build upon experience with existing schemas and deployments, placing specific emphasis on simplicity of development and integration, while applying existing authentication, authorization, and privacy models. It's intent is to reduce the cost and complexity of user management operations by providing a common user schema and extension model, as well as binding documents to provide patterns for exchanging this schema using standard protocols. In essence, make it fast, cheap, and easy to move users in to, out of, and around the cloud. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scim-api There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-scim-api-01 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim From aredston@switchresearch.com Wed Apr 17 01:02:46 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF3521F86A6 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.733 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ixuKCCBssPTt for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from appa.redston.com (host217-37-178-214.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.37.178.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584421F86A5 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by appa.redston.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A3D43731 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:57:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at redston.com Received: from appa.redston.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (appa.redston.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIA0NdLRFSyh for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:57:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.148.25] (unknown [192.168.148.25]) by appa.redston.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16403436E0 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:57:34 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <516E5719.9010008@switchresearch.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:02:33 +0100 From: Alex Redston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scim@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080803050106030509060204" Subject: Re: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:02:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080803050106030509060204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello SCIM list I am new to this list so please forgive me as I just finding my way. I am not yet sure how these matters get discussed. Issue 25 seems to be an extremely sensible change. I am unclear on issue 28 - Multi tenancy is one of the defining factors that distinguishes a cloud based solution from a hosted solution, is the intention to further explore the security considerations or instead just not give any specification in this area, my concern would be that there will be multi tenant solutions and unless the specification is at least prescriptive to some degree this will be an area which will pose greater risks to security if implementers go ahead and muddle on to create their own solution. An example of a multi tennant solution imagine a solution where a cloud based identity server presents a SCIM interface to some other cloud based service which does not have a readily accessible API. Alex Redston On issue On 16/04/2013 20:00, scim-request@ietf.org wrote: > If you have received this digest without all the individual message > attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list > subscription. To do so, go to > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim > > Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get > MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option > globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. > > > > Send scim mailing list submissions to > scim@ietf.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > scim-request@ietf.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > scim-owner@ietf.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of scim digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt > (Kelly Grizzle) > > > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim -- Alex Redston Technical Architect, Managing Director Switch Research Limited +44 1328 838821 +44 7973 320795 --------------080803050106030509060204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello SCIM list

I am new to this list so please forgive me as I just finding my way. I am not yet sure how these matters get discussed.

Issue 25 seems to be an extremely sensible change.

I am unclear on issue 28 - Multi tenancy is one of the defining factors that distinguishes a cloud based solution from a hosted solution, is the intention to further explore the security considerations or instead just not give any specification in this area, my concern would be that there will be multi tenant solutions and unless the specification is at least prescriptive to some degree this will be an area which will pose greater risks to security if implementers go ahead and muddle on to create their own solution.

An example of a multi tennant solution imagine a solution where a cloud based identity server presents a SCIM interface to some other cloud based service which does not have a readily accessible API.

Alex Redston

On issue
On 16/04/2013 20:00, scim-request@ietf.org wrote:
If you have received this digest without all the individual message
attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
subscription.  To do so, go to 

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get
MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME.  You can set this option
globally for all the list digests you receive at this point.



Send scim mailing list submissions to
	scim@ietf.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	scim-request@ietf.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	scim-owner@ietf.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of scim digest..."



Today's Topics:

   1. PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt
      (Kelly Grizzle)



_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim


-- 
Alex Redston

Technical Architect, Managing Director
Switch Research Limited

+44 1328 838821
+44 7973 320795
--------------080803050106030509060204-- From phil.hunt@oracle.com Fri Apr 19 09:12:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E121F9488 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:12:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NjJY20nBDmkm for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5270021F937F for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3JGCD0f027473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:12:14 GMT Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3JGCDbu020923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:12:13 GMT Received: from abhmt118.oracle.com (abhmt118.oracle.com [141.146.116.70]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3JGCCYN011997 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:12:12 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.14] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:12:12 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) From: Phil Hunt In-Reply-To: <074.a57d9bc165dccb8e4c208bc6bec6a4ba@tools.ietf.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:12:07 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19C7A6A2-1504-4919-A90D-5CC4DC4CE0BF@oracle.com> References: <059.adc428b841c58eef7fdb41512d283150@tools.ietf.org> <074.a57d9bc165dccb8e4c208bc6bec6a4ba@tools.ietf.org> To: scim WG X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Subject: Re: [scim] #40: JSON Format For Defining A Set of SCIM Schema Extensions (was: Standard Format For Schema Extensions) X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:12:16 -0000 FYI - I just changed the title. I looked at the tracker this morning and = found the title unclear. I suspect the resolution to this ticket would be a separate optional = draft. It would be most likely used by application developers who need = to be able to deploy SCIM schema extensions to multiple service = providers. Currently the only way to do schema extensions on a server, = would be to use each implementors different method for manage schema = changes (usually by hand through a UI). Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com On 2013-04-19, at 8:52 AM, scim issue tracker wrote: > #40: JSON Format For Defining A Set of SCIM Schema Extensions >=20 >=20 > --=20 > = -------------------------+------------------------------------------------= - > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-scim-core- > phil.hunt@oracle.com | schema@tools.ietf.org > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: > Component: core-schema | Version: > Severity: - | Resolution: > Keywords: schema | > extensions | > = -------------------------+------------------------------------------------= - >=20 > Ticket URL: = > scim >=20 From kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com Fri Apr 19 12:54:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32E721F8D31 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:54:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kp7KGv8U58ol for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A101221F8BC5 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail59-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.247) by AM1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.3.204.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:23 +0000 Received: from mail59-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail59-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295EB2075E; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -50 X-BigFish: PS-50(zzbb2dI98dI9371Ic85fh1432Iac5W9d9R1447Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah18c673h8275bh8275dh1033ILz31h2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail59-am1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail59-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail59-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1366401260255360_11556; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS009.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.240]) by mail59-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112892400AA; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by AM1EHSMHS009.bigfish.com (10.3.207.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:14 +0000 Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.25]) by BLUPRD0412HT002.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.163]) with mapi id 14.16.0293.003; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:12 +0000 From: Kelly Grizzle To: Alex Redston , "scim@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHOO0H2uow7bY0lakmhAeGhDYCBe5jcHGJQ Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:12 +0000 Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3E70CD@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: <516E5719.9010008@switchresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <516E5719.9010008@switchresearch.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-vipre-scanned: 0060967600426A006097C3 x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3E70CDBLUPRD0412MB643_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com Subject: Re: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:54:27 -0000 --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3E70CDBLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alex ... thanks for the feedback. > is the intention to further explore the security considerations or instea= d just not give any specification in this area The idea is to just give some alternatives for service providers to conside= r when implementing multi-tenancy. This section is really more informative= than it is prescriptive. Service providers may choose to implement multi-= tenancy in other ways as well. > my concern would be that there will be multi tenant solutions and unless = the specification is at least prescriptive to some degree this will be an a= rea which will pose greater risks to security if implementers go ahead and = muddle on to create their own solution. When we first started discussing multi-tenancy, it became apparent that man= y of the service providers have different ways that they want to implement = this. Instead of SCIM dictating a method (and all of the implications that= come with that particular method), we chose to leave it out of the spec an= d just provide some general guidance. We've actually discussed creating an= other document (outside of SCIM) that addresses multi-tenancy for many of t= he IETF I-Ds that have to deal with this. Do you have suggestions for text that we can add to address some of the sec= urity considerations that you foresee? --Kelly From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alex Redston Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:03 AM To: scim@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt Hello SCIM list I am new to this list so please forgive me as I just finding my way. I am n= ot yet sure how these matters get discussed. Issue 25 seems to be an extremely sensible change. I am unclear on issue 28 - Multi tenancy is one of the defining factors tha= t distinguishes a cloud based solution from a hosted solution, is the inten= tion to further explore the security considerations or instead just not giv= e any specification in this area, my concern would be that there will be mu= lti tenant solutions and unless the specification is at least prescriptive = to some degree this will be an area which will pose greater risks to securi= ty if implementers go ahead and muddle on to create their own solution. An example of a multi tennant solution imagine a solution where a cloud bas= ed identity server presents a SCIM interface to some other cloud based serv= ice which does not have a readily accessible API. Alex Redston On issue On 16/04/2013 20:00, scim-request@ietf.org wr= ote: If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. Send scim mailing list submissions to scim@ietf.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to scim-request@ietf.org You can reach the person managing the list at scim-owner@ietf.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of scim digest..." Today's Topics: 1. PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt (Kelly Grizzle) _______________________________________________ scim mailing list scim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim -- Alex Redston Technical Architect, Managing Director Switch Research Limited +44 1328 838821 +44 7973 320795 --_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3E70CDBLUPRD0412MB643_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alex ... thanks for th= e feedback.

 <= /p>

> is the intention to further explore the security considerations or i= nstead just not give any specification in this area

 <= /p>

The idea is to just give = some alternatives for service providers to consider when implementing multi= -tenancy.  This section is really more informative than it is prescriptive.  Service providers may choose to implement multi-= tenancy in other ways as well.

 <= /p>

> my concern would be that there will be multi tenant solutions and un= less the specification is at least prescriptive to some degree this will be= an area which will pose greater risks to security if implementers go ahead= and muddle on to create their own solution.

 

When we first started dis= cussing multi-tenancy, it became apparent that many of the service provider= s have different ways that they want to implement this.  Instead of SCIM dictating a method (and all of the implications that come = with that particular method), we chose to leave it out of the spec and just= provide some general guidance.  We’ve actually discussed creati= ng another document (outside of SCIM) that addresses multi-tenancy for many of the IETF I-Ds that have to deal with t= his.

 <= /p>

Do you have suggestions f= or text that we can add to address some of the security considerations that= you foresee?

 <= /p>

--Kelly

 <= /p>

From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alex Redston
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:03 AM
To: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-0= 1.txt

 

Hello SCIM list

I am new to this list so please forgive me as I just finding my way. I am n= ot yet sure how these matters get discussed.

Issue 25 seems to be an extremely sensible change.

I am unclear on issue 28 - Multi tenancy is one of the defining factors tha= t distinguishes a cloud based solution from a hosted solution, is the inten= tion to further explore the security considerations or instead just not giv= e any specification in this area, my concern would be that there will be multi tenant solutions and unless t= he specification is at least prescriptive to some degree this will be an ar= ea which will pose greater risks to security if implementers go ahead and m= uddle on to create their own solution.

An example of a multi tennant solution imagine a solution where a cloud bas= ed identity server presents a SCIM interface to some other cloud based serv= ice which does not have a readily accessible API.

Alex Redston

On issue

On 16/04/2013 20:00, scim-request@ietf.org wrote:

If you have received this digest without all the individual message
attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
subscription.  To do so, go to 
 
https://www.iet=
f.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
 
Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "=
Get
MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME.  You can set this opti=
on
globally for all the list digests you receive at this point.
 
 
 
Send scim mailing list submissions to
  scim@ietf.org

 


To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

  https://=
www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim


or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to


  scim-request@ietf.org<=
/a>


 


You can reach the person managing the list at


  scim-owner@ietf.org<=
o:p>


 


When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific


than "Re: Contents of scim digest..."











Today's Topics:


 


   1. PLEASE REVIEW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scim-api-01.txt<=
o:p>


      (Kelly Grizzle)











_______________________________________________


scim mailing list


scim@ietf.org


https://www.iet=
f.org/mailman/listinfo/scim





-- 
Alex Redston
 
Technical Architect, Managing Director
Switch Research Limited
 
+44 1328 838821
+44 7973 320795
--_000_56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3E70CDBLUPRD0412MB643_-- From hammondjohnson@hushmail.com Sat Apr 27 14:06:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650221F9910 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4P3Wj8oAaUR for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B08521F990D for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.236]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5630A31058 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) X-hush-relay-time: 220 X-hush-relay-id: b1bd903faba185ee07e5a0ed3a1fde37 Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1E462E6736; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:01:48 -0400 To: scim@ietf.org From: hammondjohnson@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20130427180149.1E462E6736@smtp.hushmail.com> Subject: [scim] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:06:49 -0000 We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on the world’s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP ( http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 ) organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia from University of Georgia, USA. We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous fundamental mistakes. Sample statements from that paper include: (1). Binary logic is fuzzy logic and vice versa (2). Pascal developed fuzzy logic (3). Object oriented languages do not exhibit any polymorphism or inheritance (4). TCP and IP are synonyms and are part of OSI model (5). Distributed systems deal with only one computer (6). Laptop is an example for a super computer (7). Operating system is an example for computer hardware Also, our paper did not express any conceptual meaning. However, it was accepted both the times without any modifications (and without any reviews) and we were invited to submit the final paper and a payment of $500+ fee to present the paper. We decided to use the fee for better purposes than making Prof. Hamid Arabnia (Chairman of WORLDCOMP) rich. After that, we received few reminders from WORLDCOMP to pay the fee but we never responded. We MUST say that you should look at the above website if you have any thoughts to submit a paper to WORLDCOMP. DBLP and other indexing agencies have stopped indexing WORLDCOMP’s proceedings since 2011 due to its fakeness. See http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icai/index.html for of one of the conferences of WORLDCOMP and notice that there is no listing after 2010. See Section 2 of http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf for comments from well-known researchers about WORLDCOMP. The status of your WORLDCOMP papers can be changed from scientific to other (i.e., junk or non-technical) at any time. Better not to have a paper than having it in WORLDCOMP and spoil the resume and peace of mind forever! Our study revealed that WORLDCOMP is a money making business, using University of Georgia mask, for Prof. Hamid Arabnia. He is throwing out a small chunk of that money (around 20 dollars per paper published in WORLDCOMP’s proceedings) to his puppet (Mr. Ashu Solo or A.M.G. Solo) who publicizes WORLDCOMP and also defends it at various forums, using fake/anonymous names. The puppet uses fake names and defames other conferences to divert traffic to WORLDCOMP. He also makes anonymous phone calls and tries to threaten the critiques of WORLDCOMP (See Item 7 of Section 5 of above website). That is, the puppet does all his best to get a maximum number of papers published at WORLDCOMP to get more money into his (and Prof. Hamid Arabnia’s) pockets. Monte Carlo Resort (the venue of WORLDCOMP for more than 10 years, until 2012) has refused to provide the venue for WORLDCOMP’13 because of the fears of their image being tarnished due to WORLDCOMP’s fraudulent activities. That is why WORLDCOMP’13 is taking place at a different resort. WORLDCOMP will not be held after 2013. The draft paper submission deadline is over but still there are no committee members, no reviewers, and there is no conference Chairman. The only contact details available on WORLDCOMP’s website is just an email address! Let us make a direct request to Prof. Hamid arabnia: publish all reviews for all the papers (after blocking identifiable details) since 2000 conference. Reveal the names and affiliations of all the reviewers (for each year) and how many papers each reviewer had reviewed on average. We also request him to look at the Open Challenge (Section 6) at https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1 Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to stop this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and people. We are shocked with Prof. Hamid Arabnia and his puppet’s activities http://worldcomp-fake-bogus.blogspot.com Search Google using the keyword worldcomp fake for additional links.