Subject: Re: [scim] scim Digest, Vol 18, Issue 13

From: Alex Redston <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:07:18 +0100

Hi,

Can I express my thoughts please.

Isn't the primary driver of SCIM to keep it really simple and drive up 
adoption? With this in mind would it not make sense to ignore 
alternative languages as part of the spec and keep to current attribute 
names, stick to ISO standard formats for data rather than localised 
forms? This is after all a machine interface not a human interface.

Thanks

Alex

Alex Redston

Technical Architect, Managing Director
Switch Research Limited

+44 1328 838821
+44 7973 320795

On 26/06/2013 15:31, [email-masked] wrote:
> If you have received this digest without all the individual message
> attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
> subscription.  To do so, go to
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
> Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get
> MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME.  You can set this option
> globally for all the list digests you receive at this point.
>
>
>
> Send scim mailing list submissions to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email-masked]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email-masked]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of scim digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: June 26th WG conf call agenda (Chris Phillips)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim