Subject: Re: [scim] confirming consensus calls: #43

From: Leif Johansson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:02:49 +0200

On 2014-03-19 14:06, Leif Johansson wrote:
> 
> In London there was consensus in the room for dropping short-hand
> notation for complex multi-valued attributes.
> 
> Please respond if you *object* to this way of handing #43
> 
> 	BestR Leif & Morteza
> 

There have been no objections.

Phil: feel free to make the required updates in the next version and
close the issue.