Subject: Re: [scim] #21 (api): Add an "application" or "system" resource (schema)

From: "Morteza Ansari (moransar)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:29:04 +0000

If anyone has concerns with closing this as WONTFIX, please bring it up to
the mailing list or update the ticket in the issue tracker.

Cheers,
Morteza

On 4/30/14, 11:49 AM, "scim issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
wrote:

>#21: Add an "application" or "system" resource (schema)
>
>
>Comment (by [email-masked]):
>
> This seems like it would be better handled as an extension rather than in
> the core schema.  I suggest we close as WONTFIX.
>
>-- 
>-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
>-
> Reporter:                           |       Owner:  draft-ietf-scim-
>  [email-masked]      |  [email-masked]
>     Type:  enhancement              |      Status:  new
> Priority:  major                    |   Milestone:
>Component:  api                      |     Version:
> Severity:  -                        |  Resolution:
> Keywords:                           |
>-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
>-
>
>Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/scim/trac/ticket/21#comment:1>
>scim <http://tools.ietf.org/scim/>
>