From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Apr 1 00:53:47 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA06026 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:53:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8v9B-0002zU-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:53:49 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8v8J-0002wg-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:52:56 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8v7b-0002oB-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:52:11 -0500 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2004 21:51:50 -0800 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i315p5BB023606; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i315olZ4012196 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:50:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404010550.i315olZ4012196@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080798647-12194-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Just what does "new" mean ? List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: SCTP Discussion List X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:47:30 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080798647-12194-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Kacheong, On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Kacheong Poon wrote: > > What we are dealing with here is that at the protocol level, SCTP > should not accept new packets when its receive window is full. We need > to make sure that no conforming SCTP implementation will hit the dead > lock situation discussed so far. If this is true, then we can think > of whether good SCTP implementations should accommodate non-conforming > implementations. And I don't think this has to be tied to the attack > you mentioned above. > > It is not a protocol issue, only an implementation issue. In Andreas' case the sender does not conform (is violating the protocol), because it is sending beyond the peer's available receive window. Taking the protocol perspective, however, why distinguish "new" from "old"? What "old" TSNs did anyone think the implementation needed to accept when its receive window is closed? Indeed, I don't think that the receiver needs to accept *any* TSNs while its receive window is closed, strictly from a protocol perspective. So I really don't worry too much about the definition of "new". What about "accept". I would say accept means taking the TSN and storing the data in the receive buffer. This includes already seen TSNs that have been renegged upon and retransmitted. But new or old, why accept either? I would say that "old" TSNs are those TSNs that do not occupy the receive window (i.e. they have been delivered to the user), and "new" TSNs are those that will occupy receive window. That is, when the receive window is closed, the receiver does not accept any TSNs that would otherwise decrease the available receive window ("new"). But then those that wouldn't aren't accepted either, because they are duplicates. If one is saying that the receive is required to report duplicate TSNs in SACKs regardless of the fact that the receive window is closed, and that this is somehow "accepting" those "old" TSNs then fine. (Along different lines, there is a case where a similar lock-up can occur between conforming implementations: if a message is sent (segmented of course) that is larger than the receive window when the receiver does not support a partial delivery api (which is not mandatory). That is, consider a receive window of 2000 bytes and a 3000 byte message is sent, segmented into three, say, 1000 byte segments. After the first two segments the receive window is closed and the sender cannot send the third (or any other) segment. The receiver cannot deliver the first two segments, because it does not support a partial delivery api. Either message size needs to be restricted a fraction of the receive window or the partial delivery API needs to be made mandatory.) --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1080798647-12194-0-- From ajung@exp-math.uni-essen.de Thu Apr 1 05:27:59 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA05018 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:27:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zQV-0001SS-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:27:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zPY-0001Kc-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:27:00 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zOf-00014L-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:26:05 -0500 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i31AP2n2027838; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 02:25:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i31AMtZ4015663 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 02:22:57 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404011022.i31AMtZ4015663@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080814975-15661-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized List-Id: sctp-impl To: SCTP Discussion List From: Andreas Jungmaier X-Nails-Approved: ajung@exp-math.uni-essen.de Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:18:12 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080814975-15661-0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I don't know whether anyone has mentioned this before: section 8.2 currently states "When the value in the error counter exceeds the protocol parameter ^^^^^^^ 'Path.Max.Retrans' of that destination address, the endpoint should mark the destination transport address as inactive, and a notification SHOULD be sent to the upper layer." section 8.3 now says: "When the value of this counter reaches the protocol parameter ^^^^^^^^ 'Path.Max.Retrans', the endpoint should mark the corresponding destination address as inactive if it is not so marked, and may also optionally report to the upper layer the change of reachability of this destination address." I would suggest a modification of the section 8.2 to conform to the latter specification. Best regards, Andreas - -- Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier Computer Networking Technology Group University of Duisburg-Essen http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung PGP Key-ID: D382 4AC0 PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAa+xkXAsLBNOCSsARAtHEAJ9nojaB3hTQq+nXzmCYf3o7bzR2WwCgyBFm fsN9Ln6iv88rKNxhjf5+YvY= =a8kB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1080814975-15661-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Apr 1 05:48:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA05476 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 05:48:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zkm-00031j-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:48:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zjp-0002xf-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:47:57 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B8zir-0002qA-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 05:46:57 -0500 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2004 02:46:39 -0800 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i31Ak5n2014655; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 02:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i31AjuZ4015963 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 02:45:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404011045.i31AjuZ4015963@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080816356-15961-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized List-Id: sctp-impl To: Andreas Jungmaier From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: SCTP Discussion List X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:42:38 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080816356-15961-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Andreas, I would say the other way around. (Because Path.Max.Retrans could be set to zero!--see the MIB.) Exceeds (>) was correct. Reaches (==) is wrong. The change from SHOULD to "optional" on reporting the fact to the user is okay. --brian On Thu, 01 Apr 2004, Andreas Jungmaier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi list, > > I don't know whether anyone has mentioned this before: > > section 8.2 currently states > "When the value in the error counter exceeds the protocol parameter > ^^^^^^^ > 'Path.Max.Retrans' of that destination address, the endpoint should > mark the destination transport address as inactive, and a > notification SHOULD be sent to the upper layer." > > section 8.3 now says: > "When the value of this counter reaches the protocol parameter > ^^^^^^^^ > 'Path.Max.Retrans', the endpoint should mark the corresponding > destination address as inactive if it is not so marked, and may also > optionally report to the upper layer the change of reachability of > this destination address." > > I would suggest a modification of the section 8.2 to conform to the > latter specification. > > Best regards, > > Andreas > > - -- > Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier > Computer Networking Technology Group > University of Duisburg-Essen > http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung > PGP Key-ID: D382 4AC0 > > PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAa+xkXAsLBNOCSsARAtHEAJ9nojaB3hTQq+nXzmCYf3o7bzR2WwCgyBFm > fsN9Ln6iv88rKNxhjf5+YvY= > =a8kB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1080816356-15961-0-- From ajung@exp-math.uni-essen.de Thu Apr 1 06:47:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA07296 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:47:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B90fv-000044-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 06:47:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B90f0-000008-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 06:47:02 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B90e3-0007e0-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 06:46:03 -0500 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i31Bj4ew014119; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:45:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i31BijZ4017020 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 03:44:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404011144.i31BijZ4017020@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080819884-17018-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: AW: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized List-Id: sctp-impl To: Meyknecht Bernward From: Andreas Jungmaier Cc: "'Brian F. G. Bidulock'" , SCTP Discussion List X-Nails-Approved: ajung@exp-math.uni-essen.de Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:40:01 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080819884-17018-0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian and Bernward, I am perfectly happy with that as well. As long as it says the same thing in both places. Best regards, Andreas On Donnerstag 01 April 2004 13:04, Meyknecht Bernward wrote: > Hi there, > > and ...in addition... the wording 'exceeds' corresponds to the > wording for the association max.retrans case from section 8.1, > should be the same understanding for both cases, > so I also prefer the 'exceeds'. > > Best regards, > Bernward > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:bidulock@openss7.org] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 12:43 > An: Andreas Jungmaier > Cc: SCTP Discussion List > Betreff: Re: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized > > > Andreas, > > I would say the other way around. (Because Path.Max.Retrans > could be set to zero!--see the MIB.) Exceeds (>) was correct. > Reaches (==) is wrong. > > The change from SHOULD to "optional" on reporting the fact > to the user is okay. > > --brian > - -- Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier Computer Networking Technology Group University of Duisburg-Essen http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung PGP Key-ID: D382 4AC0 PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAa/+RXAsLBNOCSsARAnCeAKDI1AuIZjIFi5S7gqvvs6FgajHLtACg83Wj Ey3dhttIxbl52xbG5BZjHtg= =TM5S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1080819884-17018-0-- From kacheong.poon@sun.com Thu Apr 1 20:55:38 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21356 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:55:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9DuH-0006vL-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 20:55:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9DtN-0006jJ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 20:54:46 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9Dsc-0006YJ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 20:53:58 -0500 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2004 17:53:47 -0800 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i321r2Ue010241; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:53:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i321qTZ4027978 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:52:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404020152.i321qTZ4027978@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080870749-27976-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino From: Kacheong Poon Cc: rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, ma-kun@kozuka.jp X-Nails-Approved: kacheong.poon@sun.com Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 17:51:34 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080870749-27976-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: > the compatibility mode (IPv4 mapped address) has certain caveats, see > draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01.txt > draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02.txt The first one is about API issues and the second one is more about packet format. We can skip the second one in this discussion because SCTP already defines how to handle a mix of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, unless of course we want to talk about a change in specification. More on this below. There are three concerns in the first draft above, under specification, complexity in code, and access control. Under specification can always be corrected. Complexity is in the hands of implementors, different people see things differently. But the third one actually contradicts with what SCTP can do. SCTP by design works with both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously. The third concern actually asks for an SCTP specification change. An IPv6 SCTP endpoint should not send IPv4 address to the peer. This is not how SCTP works today. Unless the SCTP specification is changed, the socket API has to support it. And using IPv4 mapped address is probably the easiest solution. I have not heard a proposal to have this change in SCTP. And even if the SCTP spec is changed, the sctp_get*addrs() still work as in the draft. The only change is that sctp_get*addrs() will not return v4 mapped address as there will not be any. > if IPv7 designers learn things from the past, they wouldn't include > IPv6 compatible address into the IPv7 specification, i guess. As I mentioned in the previous email, it does not matter if there is no compatibility mode. The sctp_get*addrs() will still work. The length will be sizeof the new IPv7 socket address structure. The only caveat is when the address length is a variable. > there was an architecture which uses variable-length address in one of > original proposals for IPng (= IPv6), so it is not that rare to have > variable-length address. A proposal is just a proposal. But is there a deployed network architecture with variable address length? This is more interesting. -- K. Poon. kacheong.poon@sun.com ------------=_1080870749-27976-0-- From me@armandocaro.net Thu Apr 1 21:17:32 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA23704 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:17:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9EFQ-0002np-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:17:32 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9EEY-0002iW-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:16:39 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9EDx-0002Wn-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:16:01 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i322EoUe029090; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i322EaZ4028277 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:14:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200404020214.i322EaZ4028277@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1080872076-28269-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: AW: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized List-Id: sctp-impl To: Andreas Jungmaier From: "Armando L. Caro Jr." Cc: Meyknecht Bernward , "'Brian F. G. Bidulock'" , SCTP Discussion List X-Nails-Approved: me@armandocaro.net Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:57:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1080872076-28269-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="X-UNKNOWN" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Just to _further_ strengthen the argument for keeping "exceeds"... the term Path.Max.Retrans implies exceeds. Intuitively, it means the sender _will_ retransmit to the destination a max of Path.Max.Retrans times. On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Andreas Jungmaier wrote: > WARNING: Unsanitized content follows. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brian and Bernward, > > I am perfectly happy with that as well. As long as it says the > same thing in both places. > > Best regards, > Andreas > > > > On Donnerstag 01 April 2004 13:04, Meyknecht Bernward wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > and ...in addition... the wording 'exceeds' corresponds to the > > wording for the association max.retrans case from section 8.1, > > should be the same understanding for both cases, > > so I also prefer the 'exceeds'. > > > > Best regards, > > Bernward > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:bidulock@openss7.org] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 12:43 > > An: Andreas Jungmaier > > Cc: SCTP Discussion List > > Betreff: Re: Wording in sections 8.2 and 8.3 should be harmonized > > > > > > Andreas, > > > > I would say the other way around. (Because Path.Max.Retrans > > could be set to zero!--see the MIB.) Exceeds (>) was correct. > > Reaches (==) is wrong. > > > > The change from SHOULD to "optional" on reporting the fact > > to the user is okay. > > > > --brian > > > > - -- > Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier > Computer Networking Technology Group > University of Duisburg-Essen > http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung > PGP Key-ID: D382 4AC0 > > PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAa/+RXAsLBNOCSsARAnCeAKDI1AuIZjIFi5S7gqvvs6FgajHLtACg83Wj > Ey3dhttIxbl52xbG5BZjHtg= > =TM5S > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > ~armando 0-- --0 | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | 0-- --0 ------------=_1080872076-28269-0-- From qnicfh@lwg.bayern.de Fri Apr 2 15:48:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28007 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:48:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9VaL-0004VH-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:48:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9VZS-0004NM-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:47:23 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9VZ3-0004Ev-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:46:57 -0500 Received: from [218.149.147.57] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B9VZ2-0006WD-LR for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:46:57 -0500 Received: from (HELO ztoj) [1.243.93.116] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id 36771661; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:46:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Fritz Coley" Reply-To: "Fritz Coley" To: Subject: A real online business hqd z ib Date: Fri, 02 Apr 04 15:46:44 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E.854_F7_9.819_C.93" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.7 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --E.854_F7_9.819_C.93 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cortland

In my 54 Page comprehensive guide I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs= together with Google AdWords to make a good living.

 

No more emails! please take me off

xvayocczmfrud vsw kvyrj fuzipih xg pl pmezivyhd gmffg --E.854_F7_9.819_C.93-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Sun Apr 4 07:32:36 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA26468 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 07:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BA5ri-0003bX-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 07:32:38 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BA5qg-0003UO-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 07:31:34 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BA5pp-0003Ae-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 07:30:41 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2004 03:37:20 +0000 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i34BTgUe013472; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i34BT6Z4013426 for sctp-impl-filtered; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404041129.i34BT6Z4013426@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081078146-13424-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:27:17 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081078146-13424-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:51:34PM -0800, Kacheong Poon wrote: > SCTP by design works with both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously. > The third concern actually asks for an SCTP specification change. > An IPv6 SCTP endpoint should not send IPv4 address to the peer. > This is not how SCTP works today. Unless the SCTP specification > is changed, the socket API has to support it. And using IPv4 mapped > address is probably the easiest solution. I have not heard a > proposal to have this change in SCTP. And even if the SCTP spec is > changed, the sctp_get*addrs() still work as in the draft. The only > change is that sctp_get*addrs() will not return v4 mapped address > as there will not be any. It is impossible to change the socket API, but the user of the API doesn't necessarily change the usage. And it must be avoided that the user has to change, I think. > As I mentioned in the previous email, it does not matter if > there is no compatibility mode. The sctp_get*addrs() will still > work. The length will be sizeof the new IPv7 socket address > structure. The only caveat is when the address length is a variable. We should use IPv7 without application's modification if IPv7 appears, while we must change the kernel and standard library(ex. libc). # Of course it is possible that IPv7 needs the fundamental change # of the socket API, ex.) bind() or connect(), I think. # But we can't know if IPv7 requires it or not. So we should do effort? Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081078146-13424-0-- From robemagn01@student.kau.se Mon Apr 5 05:31:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA19007 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 05:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAQRr-0005bC-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:31:19 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAQQs-0005Tj-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:30:19 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAQPx-0005Fu-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:29:21 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2004 01:37:22 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i359SNKj019079; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i359ReZ4000273 for sctp-impl-filtered; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404050927.i359ReZ4000273@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081157260-269-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: sctp_rcvmsg List-Id: sctp-impl To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" X-Nails-Approved: robemagn01@student.kau.se Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 11:24:50 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081157260-269-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hello !   We've tested some examples using sctp_sendmsg() and sctp_recvmsg(), for example the echo client-server in section 10 in Unix Network Programming 3rd edition. This example doesn't seem to work on the KAME stack under freeBSD, all fields in the client sockaddr_in are set to "0" and the length is also set to "0" (4:th and 5:th argument) when calling sctp_recvmsg(). The same goes for msghdr struct when calling recvmsg(). In the example the client uses sctp_sendmsg(), without any call to connetct, to send the message to the server and the server uses sctp_recvmsg(), without any call to accept, to receive the message. The data is delivered but no information about the peer address is delivered. What's wrong in the example, is something missing?   Regards and Thanks in advance Tomas Nilsson   Robert Magnusson Karlstad University ------------=_1081157260-269-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Mon Apr 5 09:28:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA29801 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 09:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAU9X-0004sz-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:28:39 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAU8c-0004ln-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:27:43 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAU80-0004aa-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:27:04 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2004 05:35:00 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i35DPMKj013422; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 06:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i35DOnZ4003658 for sctp-impl-filtered; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404051324.i35DOnZ4003658@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081171489-3656-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_rcvmsg List-Id: sctp-impl To: ROBERT MAGNUSSON From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 07:22:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081171489-3656-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Robert: As I mentioned to you in a direct mail earlier this A.M... The current kame snap seems to have some issues. The last patch I sent had MANY MANY fixes due to the KAME restructure with the m-tags pull out and the change back to using embedded scopes. Some things were broken pretty bad... and I know since we sent the last patch in we have found other issues. We also have brought the interface current to the V-8 socket API draft which was just submitted. Normally we wait to build a second patch until after kame gets the last one applied... I will attempt, however, to get a new patch up on the sctp.org web site that encompasses all fixes... and of course try things out.. I know the U-D had similar problems and yet I did not on my local set of FreeBSD machines.... but of course they are always patched :-D R ROBERT MAGNUSSON wrote: >Hello ! > >We've tested some examples using sctp_sendmsg() and sctp_recvmsg(), for >example the echo client-server in section 10 in Unix Network Programming >3rd edition. This example doesn't seem to work on the KAME stack under >freeBSD, all fields in the client sockaddr_in are set to "0" and the >length is also set to "0" (4:th and 5:th argument) when calling >sctp_recvmsg(). The same goes for msghdr struct when calling recvmsg(). >In the example the client uses sctp_sendmsg(), without any call to >connetct, to send the message to the server and the server uses >sctp_recvmsg(), without any call to accept, to receive the message. The >data is delivered but no information about the peer address is delivered. >What's wrong in the example, is something missing? > >Regards >and Thanks in advance >Tomas Nilsson >Robert Magnusson >Karlstad University > > > > > > > > -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1081171489-3656-0-- From bickhart@cis.udel.edu Mon Apr 5 20:28:15 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA26522 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAeRr-00041Y-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:28:15 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAe26-0001NP-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:01:39 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAdjw-0006Db-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:42:52 -0400 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i35NfoUe021121; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i35NfUZ4011741 for sctp-impl-filtered; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404052341.i35NfUZ4011741@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081208490-11739-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: RE: sctp_rcvmsg List-Id: sctp-impl To: "'ROBERT MAGNUSSON'" From: "Ryan W Bickhart" Cc: X-Nails-Approved: bickhart@cis.udel.edu Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:18:35 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081208490-11739-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Robert: As Randall mentioned earlier, we had the same problem installing the latest KAME snapshot last week. We finally got everything working, so I put together our exact install procedure for FreeBSD 4.9 which can be found here: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~bickhart/research/sctp-install.txt The instructions listed above reference some updated code that Randall provided to us, which I have placed here: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~bickhart/research/sctp-randall.tar.gz If you go through the instructions step-by-step you should end up with a working SCTP installation which runs the UNP sample code as expected. (Note that you may need to fix the makefile that comes with the UNP code.) Good luck, Ryan -----Original Message----- From: ROBERT MAGNUSSON [mailto:robemagn01@student.kau.se] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:25 AM To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com Subject: sctp_rcvmsg Hello !   We've tested some examples using sctp_sendmsg() and sctp_recvmsg(), for example the echo client-server in section 10 in Unix Network Programming 3rd edition. This example doesn't seem to work on the KAME stack under freeBSD, all fields in the client sockaddr_in are set to "0" and the length is also set to "0" (4:th and 5:th argument) when calling sctp_recvmsg(). The same goes for msghdr struct when calling recvmsg(). In the example the client uses sctp_sendmsg(), without any call to connetct, to send the message to the server and the server uses sctp_recvmsg(), without any call to accept, to receive the message. The data is delivered but no information about the peer address is delivered. What's wrong in the example, is something missing?   Regards and Thanks in advance Tomas Nilsson   Robert Magnusson Karlstad University ------------=_1081208490-11739-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Tue Apr 6 13:13:10 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA07285 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:13:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAu8M-0002Tj-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:13:10 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAtps-0000Jr-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:54:05 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAtOr-0002zG-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:26:09 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2004 09:26:11 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i36GOvew018453; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i36GOOZ4024929 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404061624.i36GOOZ4024929@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081268664-24927-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: patch 20 List-Id: sctp-impl To: SCTP Implementors From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:24:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081268664-24927-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary All: Ok, I have now worked out all the issues surrounding the recent changes with kame and the -08 socket api. Please find a new patch for the current KAME snap at http://www.sctp.org thanks R -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1081268664-24927-0-- From kacheong.poon@sun.com Tue Apr 6 19:46:26 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13414 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:46:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB0Gx-0005WF-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 19:46:27 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAzU9-0006sW-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:56:02 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAySn-0007dP-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:50:33 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2004 14:50:36 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i36LnZBB004943; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 14:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i36Ln8Z4029134 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 14:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404062149.i36Ln8Z4029134@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081288148-29132-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: KOZUKA Masahiro From: Kacheong Poon Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: kacheong.poon@sun.com Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:48:15 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081288148-29132-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > We should use IPv7 without application's modification if IPv7 appears, > while we must change the kernel and standard library(ex. libc). Is the above possible? For example, a current app using IPv6 socket has sockaddr_in6/AF_INET6 hard coded in it. When IPv7 comes along, can the above app just work with IPv7 address without modification? -- K. Poon. kacheong.poon@sun.com ------------=_1081288148-29132-0-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Tue Apr 6 23:27:41 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29837 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 23:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB3j4-00058a-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:27:42 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BB2SE-0005iF-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:06:15 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB1hM-00078g-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:17:48 -0400 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i371GfKj011427; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i371G2Z4001876 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404070116.i371G2Z4001876@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081300562-1874-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:14:18 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081300562-1874-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Kacheong Poon wrote: > Is the above possible? For example, a current app using IPv6 > socket has sockaddr_in6/AF_INET6 hard coded in it. When IPv7 > comes along, can the above app just work with IPv7 address > without modification? If sockaddr_in6/AF_INET6 hard code exits, it is impossible. In the Protocol Independent Programing the hard code doesn't exists, so it is possible, I think. http://www.mew.org/~kazu/doc/piprog.html # It is a thorny issue that a current app has the hard code. # We promoted the Protocol Independent Programing, but many apps still have # the hard code ex.) wget.... Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081300562-1874-0-- From kacheong.poon@sun.com Wed Apr 7 00:47:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA11584 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:47:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB4yK-0000Uq-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:47:32 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BB4NQ-0002mk-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:09:25 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB3Kt-0003KV-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:02:43 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2004 20:02:50 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3731gBB008276; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3731MZ4003262 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404070301.i3731MZ4003262@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081306881-3260-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: KOZUKA Masahiro From: Kacheong Poon Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: kacheong.poon@sun.com Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:00:27 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081306881-3260-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > If sockaddr_in6/AF_INET6 hard code exits, it is impossible. > In the Protocol Independent Programing the hard code doesn't exists, > so it is possible, I think. > http://www.mew.org/~kazu/doc/piprog.html Because of the contraint that an SCTP endpoint has to support both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously, to do what you suggested above means that all the calls which handle a list of addresses should be changed to take a linked list as argument, as in the getaddinfo(). In fact, to make it work as in the program on tha page, sctp_connectx() has to take struct addrinfo as the argument so that an app can just pass in the resulting list from getaddrinfo() directly. What do SCTP implementors think about this? -- K. Poon. kacheong.poon@sun.com ------------=_1081306881-3260-0-- From cait@asomi.com Wed Apr 7 04:12:06 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA22414 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 04:12:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB8AI-0006pO-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 04:12:06 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BB6l7-0005ck-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 02:42:01 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB5uO-0005AZ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 01:47:32 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2004 21:54:45 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i375kVKj006690; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i375jvZ4005334 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404070545.i375jvZ4005334@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081316757-5332-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Kacheong Poon" From: "Caitlin Bestler" Cc: "KOZUKA Masahiro" , "Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: cait@asomi.com Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:44:11 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081316757-5332-0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Kacheong Poon said: > KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > >> If sockaddr_in6/AF_INET6 hard code exits, it is impossible. >> In the Protocol Independent Programing the hard code doesn't exists, >> so it is possible, I think. >> http://www.mew.org/~kazu/doc/piprog.html > > Because of the contraint that an SCTP endpoint has to support > both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously, to do what you suggested > above means that all the calls which handle a list of addresses > should be changed to take a linked list as argument, as in the > getaddinfo(). In fact, to make it work as in the program on tha page, > sctp_connectx() has to take struct addrinfo as the argument so that an > app can just pass in the resulting list from getaddrinfo() directly. > > What do SCTP implementors think about this? > On an IPv6 capable system, the application can specify either IPv4 or IPv6 addresses within the IPv6 format. The only benefit I can see of a "mixed format" listing is that it would ensure that a "IPv4 only" program would at least be aware that there were other addresses, even if it did not know how to use them yet. Of course, "IPv4 only" programs exist largely through inertia and failure to update code. So I don't see much benefit in defining an API extension on their behalf. I am wondering if the only thing that might be needed is an advisory section in the Implementers Guide on proper use of IPv6 address encoding. ------------=_1081316757-5332-0-- From u1vnwrgc@dkfz-heidelberg.de Wed Apr 7 21:48:07 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA04901 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBOeF-0007Dw-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:48:07 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBNJc-0001ke-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:22:45 -0400 Received: from [61.153.208.70] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBKwI-0002zF-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:50:33 -0400 Received: from [50.72.126.103] by 132.151.6.1; Sat, 08 May 2004 03:45:25 +0500 Message-ID: <4$-$h-d3f7$o-4mf@faq69m1> From: "Simon Sykes" Reply-To: "Simon Sykes" To: , , , Subject: A new hot OTCBB for all of you gaitttoiqag Date: Sat, 08 May 04 03:45:25 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="CF1A.B5CD.76AAAC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, RATWARE_EGROUPS,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --CF1A.B5CD.76AAAC Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ***ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET*** Undervalued Market Report For Largest Percentage Gain Leaders Opening Price: 2 cents Immediate Target: 10 cents in 10 days Near-Term Proj. High: 25 cents Current Market Value (Approx): 1.5 million **Our Picks Are On Fire!** Our last pick for huge percentage gains (GDLS) soared from 23 to .83 (261% on 3/29) immediately following our report. We believe the gains for ARET will run circles around all our other picks for the year. Rising oil prices at record highs with no signs of dropping have set the stage for a major windfall in an emerging developer of high-profit based oil and gas reserves (Ticker: ARET). Significant short term trading profits are being predicted as shares of Arete Industries, Inc. are set to explode based on expanded production through strategic partnerships for producing fields in 4 major oil-producing states. ARET just released major news and we believe there is much more to follow. There is strong evidence of big block buying indicating that an explosive move is coming on a huge near-term announcement. As recently reported, ARET is executing the launch of a $1 Billion financed "Master Energy Fund" which is capped at $100 Million increments to fund the Company's energy projects. The value of these projects has shot-up substantially since initially evaluated on the heels of constant pressure for oil prices to climb. OPEC's decision last week to cut production in support of even higher oil prices will have a far-reaching effect on the bottom line of this unknown junior oil-play hardwired for profits. ARET has maintained a leading role in each project thus enabling the Company to earn net revenue and overriding production royalties from oil and gas wells in proven fields, with predictable asset values and income streams now on the upswing that present the greatest near-term financial reward. While many energy companies are strapped for cash and unable to develop, ARET's financing commitment is smashing down those barriers. ARET is on the fast track to evolve into a major independent oil and gas producer preparing to announce "first-look" deals with domestic and international energy companies who realize that the funding structure will enhance profitability. Just In: ARET to Develop Energy Trading Platform for Oil and Gas with Major International Trading Company to Create Substantial Corporate Revenues How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to an undervalued Company in play due to the hottest topic in the country; soaring energy prices with clear signals for greater price increases on the horizon. Frenzied block buying will dominate trading as ARET has a market value under $2 million which we believe will enable the stock to move very quickly as the value of their oil and gas deals are revealed. Forward-looking statements: Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within= this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of 365,000 independently purchased shares of ARET prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares.= Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward- looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectation= s involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. = ypnydwqx ktnheylvnjsuvbkh aftb --CF1A.B5CD.76AAAC-- From kacheong.poon@sun.com Thu Apr 8 04:03:10 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA18486 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 04:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBUVB-0001l9-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 04:03:09 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBSFo-0001rR-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 01:39:10 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBQav-0003Gi-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:52:49 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2004 20:53:08 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i383oJBB020180; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i383ndZ4022990 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404080349.i383ndZ4022990@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081396179-22982-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Caitlin Bestler From: Kacheong Poon Cc: KOZUKA Masahiro , Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: kacheong.poon@sun.com Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:48:36 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081396179-22982-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Caitlin Bestler wrote: > On an IPv6 capable system, the application can specify either IPv4 > or IPv6 addresses within the IPv6 format. I think the goal is that the app should not even know if it is using IPv4 or IPv6 address. > The only benefit I can see of a "mixed format" listing is that it > would ensure that a "IPv4 only" program would at least be aware > that there were other addresses, even if it did not know how to > use them yet. > > Of course, "IPv4 only" programs exist largely through inertia and > failure to update code. So I don't see much benefit in defining an > API extension on their behalf. > > I am wondering if the only thing that might be needed is an advisory > section in the Implementers Guide on proper use of IPv6 address > encoding. The current SCTP socket API draft has that. But it is not the intention of this discussion thread. -- K. Poon. kacheong.poon@sun.com ------------=_1081396179-22982-0-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Thu Apr 8 06:50:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA06958 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 06:50:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBX6h-0000wf-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 06:50:03 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBVfM-0001lJ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 05:17:46 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBT4D-00014N-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:31:13 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2004 22:38:36 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i386UGGF022161; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i386ToZ4025059 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 23:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404080629.i386ToZ4025059@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081405790-25057-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:27:56 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081405790-25057-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:00:27PM -0700, Kacheong Poon wrote: > Because of the contraint that an SCTP endpoint has to support > both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously, to do what you suggested > above means that all the calls which handle a list of addresses > should be changed to take a linked list as argument, as in the > getaddinfo(). In fact, to make it work as in the program on tha page, > sctp_connectx() has to take struct addrinfo as the argument so that an > app can just pass in the resulting list from getaddrinfo() directly. Um.... I can't agree with the sctp_connectx()'s specification, too. This specification uses addrs as the array of "struct sockaddr *", but in sctp_connectx() it isn't treated as the array. -- int sctp_connectx(int fd, struct sockaddr *addrs, int addrcnt) { int i,len,ret,cnt; struct sockaddr *at; len = sizeof(int); at = addrs; cnt = 0; /* validate all the addresses and get the size */ for (i=0; i < addrcnt; i++) { if ((at->sa_family != AF_INET) && (at->sa_family != AF_INET6)) { errno = EINVAL; return (-1); } len += at->sa_len; at = (struct sockaddr *)((caddr_t)at + at->sa_len); cnt++; } -- This way is strange, I think.... And on the Linix systems, without sa_len, we have to know socklen_t's information in the use of sa_family, the way which we should avoid. So, it should be avoided that addrs is the sockaddr's pointer. Well, what should we use as sctp_connectx()'s addrs? 1) No change:) But this way is bad for the Protocol Independent Programing.... 2) Use the pointer of "struct sockaddr *", struct sockaddr **? But sctp_connectx() is a system call or in sctp_connectx() use a system call, we have to use copyin() to get the actual data, and we have to have the length of the actual data. So this way is impossible, I think. 3) Create a new struct and use it. An example. -- struct sctp_address { struct sockaddr *sa_addr; socklen_t *sa_addrlen; struct sctp_address *sa_next; }; int sctp_connectx(int fd, struct sctp_address *addrs); -- Users use sctp_connectx() as below.... -- int s; struct addrinfo hints, *res0, *res; struct sctp_address *addr0, *addr; /* Get s and res using getaddrinfo() and socket() */ addr0 = addr = NULL; for (res = res0; res; res = res->ai_next) { if (addr == NULL) { addr = (struct sctp_address *)malloc(sizeof(struct sctp_address)); addr0 = addr; } else { addr->sa_next = (struct sctp_address *)malloc(sizeof(struct sctp_address)); addr = addr->sa_next; } memset(addr, 0 sizeof(*addr)); addr->sa_addr = res->ai_addr; addr->sa_addrlen = res->ai_addrlen; } sctp_connectx(s, addr0); /* Free addr. */ freeaddrinfo(res0); -- Comment? Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081405790-25057-0-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Thu Apr 8 08:08:48 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA10655 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 08:08:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBYKt-00007z-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:08:47 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBWHO-0000DQ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 05:57:04 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBU89-0007ht-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 03:39:21 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2004 00:39:44 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i387cQKj005646; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i387c7Z4025937 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404080738.i387c7Z4025937@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081409887-25935-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , rrs@cisco.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:36:09 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081409887-25935-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:27:56PM +0900, KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > And on the Linix systems, without sa_len, we have to know socklen_t's > information in the use of sa_family, the way which we should avoid. > > So, it should be avoided that addrs is the sockaddr's pointer. > Well, what should we use as sctp_connectx()'s addrs? I have a mistake. On Linux systems if this process is executed in kernel or the shared library, it will not make the Protocl Independent Programing impossible. To convert from addrinfo{} to sockaddr[], we can do bellow... -- sz = 0; for (res = res0; res; res = res->ai_next) sz += res->ai_addrlen; addr0 = (struct sockaddr *)malloc(sz); addr = addr0; for (res = res0; res; res = res->ai_next) { memmove(addr, res->ai_addr, res->ai_addrlen); addr = (struct sockaddr *)((caddr_t)addr + res->ai_addrlen); } sctp_connectx(s, addr0, sz); -- > 1) No change:) > But this way is bad for the Protocol Independent Programing.... So, above is wrong but this way isn't smart, I think. Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081409887-25935-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Thu Apr 8 14:54:14 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA10640 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:54:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBefF-0004PM-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:54:13 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBbpw-0000zN-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:53:05 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBZnO-00014X-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:42:18 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2004 05:49:46 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i38DfCGF004596; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i38DeoZ4000956 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 06:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404081340.i38DeoZ4000956@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081431650-954-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: KOZUKA Masahiro From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" Cc: Kacheong Poon , Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:40:43 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081431650-954-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Masahiro-san: You are confusing a general discussion for the way I chose to implement this function.. I did NOT have to implement it this way .. and Kacheong would say I did it wrong... Just because one particular implementation does a library one way or another is not relevant to the discussion... And of course this was NEVER meant to run on Linux systems.. in fact a linux system may just do a true syscall.. I did not since they are harder to get in, in BSD... and besides.. If I was doing a linux implementation I would do it differently... I might be looking at AF_INET/AF_INET6 .. and don't tell me no one has to look at these.. the calls you emphasis in your web page do... i.e. the library calls your code example calls.. and these are library calls so they are free to look at AF_INET/AF_INET6 or even AF_INET7 if that ever shows up... R KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: >On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:00:27PM -0700, Kacheong Poon wrote: > > >>Because of the contraint that an SCTP endpoint has to support >>both IPv4 and IPv6 address simultaneously, to do what you suggested >>above means that all the calls which handle a list of addresses >>should be changed to take a linked list as argument, as in the >>getaddinfo(). In fact, to make it work as in the program on tha page, >>sctp_connectx() has to take struct addrinfo as the argument so that an >>app can just pass in the resulting list from getaddrinfo() directly. >> >> >Um.... I can't agree with the sctp_connectx()'s specification, too. >This specification uses addrs as the array of "struct sockaddr *", >but in sctp_connectx() it isn't treated as the array. > -- >int >sctp_connectx(int fd, struct sockaddr *addrs, int addrcnt) >{ > int i,len,ret,cnt; > struct sockaddr *at; > len = sizeof(int); > at = addrs; > cnt = 0; > /* validate all the addresses and get the size */ > for (i=0; i < addrcnt; i++) { > if ((at->sa_family != AF_INET) && > (at->sa_family != AF_INET6)) { > errno = EINVAL; > return (-1); > } > len += at->sa_len; > at = (struct sockaddr *)((caddr_t)at + at->sa_len); > cnt++; > } > -- >This way is strange, I think.... >And on the Linix systems, without sa_len, we have to know socklen_t's >information in the use of sa_family, the way which we should avoid. > >So, it should be avoided that addrs is the sockaddr's pointer. >Well, what should we use as sctp_connectx()'s addrs? > >1) No change:) > But this way is bad for the Protocol Independent Programing.... > >2) Use the pointer of "struct sockaddr *", struct sockaddr **? > But sctp_connectx() is a system call or in sctp_connectx() use a system call, > we have to use copyin() to get the actual data, and we have to have the length > of the actual data. > So this way is impossible, I think. > >3) Create a new struct and use it. > An example. > -- >struct sctp_address { > struct sockaddr *sa_addr; > socklen_t *sa_addrlen; > struct sctp_address *sa_next; >}; >int >sctp_connectx(int fd, struct sctp_address *addrs); > -- > > Users use sctp_connectx() as below.... > -- > int s; > struct addrinfo hints, *res0, *res; > struct sctp_address *addr0, *addr; > /* Get s and res using getaddrinfo() and socket() */ > addr0 = addr = NULL; > for (res = res0; res; res = res->ai_next) { > if (addr == NULL) { > addr = (struct sctp_address *)malloc(sizeof(struct sctp_address)); > addr0 = addr; > } else { > addr->sa_next = (struct sctp_address *)malloc(sizeof(struct sctp_address)); > addr = addr->sa_next; > } > memset(addr, 0 sizeof(*addr)); > addr->sa_addr = res->ai_addr; > addr->sa_addrlen = res->ai_addrlen; > } > sctp_connectx(s, addr0); > /* Free addr. */ > freeaddrinfo(res0); > -- >Comment? > >Regards, Masahiro. > > -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1081431650-954-0-- From 83jzulfmxt@orange.ne.jp Thu Apr 8 17:42:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA27187 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:42:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBhI8-0007jM-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:42:32 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBerw-0005o7-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:07:23 -0400 Received: from [61.77.210.34] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBc7D-0003JI-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:10:56 -0400 Received: from [173.181.199.96] by 132.151.6.1; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:01:20 +0100 Message-ID: <89yy-0$-i$n$o$$7w1rel1-$971$-87@wc86.4j9.f1mf> From: "Tracey Garner" <83jzulfmxt@orange.ne.jp> Reply-To: "Tracey Garner" <83jzulfmxt@orange.ne.jp> To: , , , , , , Subject: Here's a heads up on an undervalued stock ready to pop yxebrp hxzrqsmrp Date: Thu, 08 Apr 04 18:01:20 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_36C6_.D.E5_." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_36C6_.D.E5_. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ***ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET*** Undervalued Market Report For Largest Percentage Gain Leaders Opening Price: 2 cents Immediate Target: 10 cents in 10 days Near-Term Proj. High: 25 cents Current Market Value (Approx): 1.5 million **Our Picks Are On Fire!** Our last pick for huge percentage gains (GDLS) soared from 23 to .83 (261% on 3/29) immediately following our report. We believe the gains for ARET will run circles around all our other picks for the year. Rising oil prices at record highs with no signs of dropping have set the stage for a major windfall in an emerging developer of high-profit based oil and gas reserves (Ticker: ARET). Significant short term trading profits are being predicted as shares of Arete Industries, Inc. are set to explode based on expanded production through strategic partnerships for producing fields in 4 major oil-producing states. ARET just released major news and we believe there is much more to follow. There is strong evidence of big block buying indicating that an explosive move is coming on a huge near-term announcement. As recently reported, ARET is executing the launch of a $1 Billion financed "Master Energy Fund" which is capped at $100 Million increments to fund the Company's energy projects. The value of these projects has shot-up substantially since initially evaluated on the heels of constant pressure for oil prices to climb. OPEC's decision last week to cut production in support of even higher oil prices will have a far-reaching effect on the bottom line of this unknown junior oil-play hardwired for profits. ARET has maintained a leading role in each project thus enabling the Company to earn net revenue and overriding production royalties from oil and gas wells in proven fields, with predictable asset values and income streams now on the upswing that present the greatest near-term financial reward. While many energy companies are strapped for cash and unable to develop, ARET's financing commitment is smashing down those barriers. ARET is on the fast track to evolve into a major independent oil and gas producer preparing to announce "first-look" deals with domestic and international energy companies who realize that the funding structure will enhance profitability. Just In: ARET to Develop Energy Trading Platform for Oil and Gas with Major International Trading Company to Create Substantial Corporate Revenues How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to an undervalued Company in play due to the hottest topic in the country; soaring energy prices with clear signals for greater price increases on the horizon. Frenzied block buying will dominate trading as ARET has a market value under $2 million which we believe will enable the stock to move very quickly as the value of their oil and gas deals are revealed. Forward-looking statements: Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within= this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of 365,000 independently purchased shares of ARET prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares.= Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward- looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectation= s involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. = jzwqlgjzb mlbxtqq znd t --_36C6_.D.E5_.-- From zzm75gvwp@cat.email.ne.jp Thu Apr 8 18:43:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA03923 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:43:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBiEw-00075m-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:43:18 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBgJF-0000g5-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:39:40 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBdXP-0004sP-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:42:03 -0400 Received: from c-24-127-42-221.we.client2.attbi.com ([24.127.42.221]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBdND-0001Pe-GO; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:31:32 -0400 Received: from [57.45.230.75] by c-24-127-42-221.we.client2.attbi.com with SMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:23:33 -0100 Message-ID: <7$$q9$-oa3$1@hpxav> From: "Marisa Ladd" Reply-To: "Marisa Ladd" To: , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory back pain, orthopaedic, accident, sxomhuxdbxcija Date: Thu, 08 Apr 04 17:23:33 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_38E__E_74D5_1BE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2, MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_38E__E_74D5_1BE Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be = used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. mzuaxmqwgoy axgvq ixqd q vdhstev nl ktdn nexjptd j jxmi kv qpkipyu ybab vd kmfgb yskzdxooyikrnv --_38E__E_74D5_1BE-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Thu Apr 8 18:47:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA04356 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBiIX-0007M1-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:47:01 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBgOw-0001VY-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:45:32 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBdhO-0005vc-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:52:22 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2004 09:59:50 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i38Hp8GF029900; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i38HoiZ4004195 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404081750.i38HoiZ4004195@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081446643-4187-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Kacheong Poon , Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 02:48:56 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081446643-4187-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Randall Stewart (cisco) wrote: > You are confusing a general discussion for the way > I chose to implement this function.. I did NOT have > to implement it this way .. and Kacheong would say > I did it wrong... Yes, I made a mistake for sctp_connectx(), this function doesn't make the Protocol Independent Programing impossible, I think, as http://www.sctp.org/archive/2053.html So, I don't think that sctp_connectx() should be changed. > Just because one particular implementation does > a library one way or another is not relevant to the > discussion... And of course this was NEVER meant > to run on Linux systems.. in fact a linux system may > just do a true syscall.. I did not since they are > harder to get in, in BSD... and besides.. If I was > doing a linux implementation I would do it > differently... > > I might be looking at AF_INET/AF_INET6 .. and don't > tell me no one has to look at these.. the calls you emphasis > in your web page do... i.e. the library calls your code > example calls.. and these are library calls so they are > free to look at AF_INET/AF_INET6 or even AF_INET7 if that > ever shows up... Yes, I don't think that the implementation must be in a way. sctp_connectx() is a system call or a library function, is a choice for the implementer, bacause this choice doesn't affect the Protocol Independent. It is a problem that the specification will make the application programer have to do Protocol "Dependent" Programing. In the internal code, the protocol dependent code is harmless. I confused that the latter was harm.... I'm sorry. But sctp_get[lp]addrs() affects the Protocol Independent. So sctp_get[lp]addrs() should be changed to return socklen_t too, I think. Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081446643-4187-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Thu Apr 8 19:10:53 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA06032 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBifd-00024M-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBhwJ-0005AM-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:24:04 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBftQ-00038h-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:12:56 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBeUX-0005TD-4F for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:43:09 -0400 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i38Ig3Kj002644; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i38IfmZ4004838 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404081841.i38IfmZ4004838@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081449708-4836-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: KOZUKA Masahiro From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" Cc: Kacheong Poon , Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:41:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081449708-4836-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > >But sctp_get[lp]addrs() affects the Protocol Independent. >So sctp_get[lp]addrs() should be changed to return socklen_t too, I think. > Ok, so how do you propose returning the socklen_t... I have seen you state this.. please be more specific... I have an array of X structures to send up from the kernel... where do the socklen_t's go for all of these? R > >Regards, Masahiro. > > -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1081449708-4836-0-- From Administration@computeradmin.org Fri Apr 9 08:00:40 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24087 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 08:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBuga-00054K-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 08:00:40 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBueh-0004tT-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 07:58:44 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBueA-0004mK-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 07:58:10 -0400 Received: from [211.42.111.200] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBue3-0006tM-Ag; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 07:58:04 -0400 Received: from gl.39r96h7.com [177.76.166.122] by 65.246.255.50 with SMTP for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Admin" To: asrg@ietf.org Subject: ADV: Attention All Nonprofit Orgs: (Members, Staff and Associates): Date: Fri, 09 Apr 04 14:57:34 GMT X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="077E196A_2.7B" X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.7 required=5.0 tests=ADVERT_CODE,AWL, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.5 X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set to high * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 1.6 ADVERT_CODE Subject: starts with advertising tag * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM Forged mail pretending to be from AOL (by From) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.2 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --077E196A_2.7B Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attention All Nonprofit Organizations, Members, Staff and Associates: You Must Respond By 5 P.M. Monday, April 12, 2004. Through a special arrangement, Avtech Direct is offering a limited allotment of BRAND NEW, top of-the-line, name-brand desktop computers at more than 50% off MSRP to all Members, Staff and Associates who respond to this message before 5 P.M., Monday, April 12, 2004. All desktop computers are brand-new packed in their original boxes, and come with a full manufacturer's warranty plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. These professional grade Desktops are fully equipped with 2004 next generation technology, making these the best performing computers money can buy. Avtech Direct is offering these feature rich, top performing Desktop Computers with the latest Intel technology at an amazing price to all who call: 1-800-884-9510 by 5 P.M. Monday, April 12, 2004 The fast and powerful AT-2400 series Desktop features: * Intel 2.0Ghz Processor for amazing speed and performance * 128MB DDR RAM, --- Upgradeable to 1024 * 20 GB UDMA Hard Drive, --- Upgradeable to 80 GB * 52X CD-Rom Drive, --- Upgradeable to DVD/CDRW * 1.44 Floppy disk drive * Next Generation Technology * ATI Premium video and sound * Full Connectivity with Fax modem/Lan/IEE 1394/USB 2.0 * Soft Touch Keyboard and scroll mouse * Internet Ready * Network Ready * 1 Year parts and labor warranty * Priority customer service and tech support MSRP $699 ........................................ Your Cost $297 How to qualify: 1. You must be a Member, Staff or Associate of a Nonprofit: 2. All desktop computers will be available on a first come first serve basis. 3. You must call 1-800-884-9510 by 5 P.M. Monday, April 12, 2004 and we will hold the desktops you request on will call. 4. You are not obligated in any way. 5. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. Call Avtech Direct 1-800-884-9510 before 5 P.M. Monday, April 12, 2004 If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please go to: http://www.computeradvice.org/unsubscribe.asp --077E196A_2.7B-- From uddbr274s@grnet.gr Sat Apr 10 11:48:57 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA09566 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:48:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCKj4-0000Rc-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:48:58 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BCKhe-0000GY-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:47:30 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCKgi-00005b-00; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:46:32 -0400 Received: from c-24-14-74-176.client.comcast.net ([24.14.74.176]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BCKgO-0001Ps-Kw; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:46:15 -0400 Received: from [212.67.117.100] by c-24-14-74-176.client.comcast.net id <2703821-18467>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:36:10 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Eloise Zimmerman" Reply-To: "Eloise Zimmerman" To: , , , , , , Subject: Stock headed much higher on major exposure buux aw rbapyy Date: Sat, 10 Apr 04 16:36:10 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2EE_995C.BC.34_CC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.6 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 1.9 FORGED_MUA_EUDORA Forged mail pretending to be from Eudora --2EE_995C.BC.34_CC Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ***ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET****ARET*** Undervalued Market Report For Largest Percentage Gain Leaders Opening Price: 2 cents Immediate Target: 10 cents in 10 days Near-Term Proj. High: 25 cents Current Market Value (Approx): 1.5 million **Our Picks Are On Fire!** Our last pick for huge percentage gains (GDLS) soared from 23 to .83 (261% on 3/29) immediately following our report. We believe the gains for ARET will run circles around all our other picks for the year. Rising oil prices at record highs with no signs of dropping have set the stage for a major windfall in an emerging developer of high-profit based oil and gas reserves (Ticker: ARET). Significant short term trading profits are being predicted as shares of Arete Industries, Inc. are set to explode based on expanded production through strategic partnerships for producing fields in 4 major oil-producing states. ARET just released major news and we believe there is much more to follow. There is strong evidence of big block buying indicating that an explosive move is coming on a huge near-term announcement. As recently reported, ARET is executing the launch of a $1 Billion financed "Master Energy Fund" which is capped at $100 Million increments to fund the Company's energy projects. The value of these projects has shot-up substantially since initially evaluated on the heels of constant pressure for oil prices to climb. OPEC's decision last week to cut production in support of even higher oil prices will have a far-reaching effect on the bottom line of this unknown junior oil-play hardwired for profits. ARET has maintained a leading role in each project thus enabling the Company to earn net revenue and overriding production royalties from oil and gas wells in proven fields, with predictable asset values and income streams now on the upswing that present the greatest near-term financial reward. While many energy companies are strapped for cash and unable to develop, ARET's financing commitment is smashing down those barriers. ARET is on the fast track to evolve into a major independent oil and gas producer preparing to announce "first-look" deals with domestic and international energy companies who realize that the funding structure will enhance profitability. Just In: ARET to Develop Energy Trading Platform for Oil and Gas with Major International Trading Company to Create Substantial Corporate Revenues How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to an undervalued Company in play due to the hottest topic in the country; soaring energy prices with clear signals for greater price increases on the horizon. Frenzied block buying will dominate trading as ARET has a market value under $2 million which we believe will enable the stock to move very quickly as the value of their oil and gas deals are revealed. Forward-looking statements: Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within= this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of 365,000 independently purchased shares of ARET prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares.= Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward- looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectation= s involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. = kh pgg zoj a lgh xmpf q eb lvfzdktxungc euozxf gfwu --2EE_995C.BC.34_CC-- From ma-kun@kozuka.jp Sun Apr 11 11:25:11 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26978 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCgpb-0007L9-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:25:11 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BCgoQ-00079P-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCgnB-0006sL-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:22:41 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2004 08:23:37 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3BFLNew014656; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 08:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3BFKgZ4028593 for sctp-impl-filtered; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404111520.i3BFKgZ4028593@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081696842-28591-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp_get[lp]addrs() and socklen_t List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" From: KOZUKA Masahiro Cc: Kacheong Poon , Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: ma-kun@kozuka.jp Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:18:48 +0900 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081696842-28591-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 01:41:42PM -0500, Randall Stewart (cisco) wrote: > Ok, so how do you propose returning the socklen_t... I have > seen you state this.. please be more specific... > > I have an array of X structures to send up from the > kernel... where do the socklen_t's go for all of these? It is a possible way to use a linked list as getaddrinfo(), I think. ex.) -- struct addrlist { struct sockaddr *al_addr; socklen_t al_len; struct addrlist *al_next; }; int sctp_get[lp]addrs(int s, struct addrlist **list); int sctp_free[lp]addrs(struct addrlist *list); -- This way may be more incompatible with system calls. But the current way, sctp_get[lp]addrs() allocates the memory and sctp_free[lp]addrs() destroy it, is incompatible too i.e.) it has to be a library function, I think. So this way isn't so bad? Regards, Masahiro. -- {^-^}/@kozuka.jp / KOZUKA Masahiro ------------=_1081696842-28591-0-- From vsingh012@bigpond.com Mon Apr 12 07:11:06 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14976 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCzLA-0002H0-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:11:00 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BCzKi-0002Bw-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:10:33 -0400 Received: from mta11ps.bigpond.com ([144.135.25.184]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BCzJf-00021R-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:09:28 -0400 Received: from lerc-daemon.mta11ps.email.bigpond.com by mta11ps.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) id <0HW20000W0HN8Z@mta11ps.email.bigpond.com> for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:44:12 +1000 (EST) Received: from email.bigpond.com ([172.26.103.21]) by mta11ps.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HW200GTE0HKQ9@mta11ps.email.bigpond.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:44:08 +1000 (EST) Received: from [192.168.115.141] by mailms12ps.email.bigpond.com (mshttpd) ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:44:08 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:44:08 -0700 From: vsingh012 Subject: FINAL NOTIFICATION (CONTACT YOUR CLAIMS AGENT) Message-id: <8e3ea500.a5008e3e@email.bigpond.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Nov 18 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=CONGRATULATIONS, DEAR_SOMETHING,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,NIGERIAN_BODY1,NIGERIAN_BODY2,NIGERIAN_BODY3, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers * 1.2 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 0.0 CONGRATULATIONS BODY: Congratulations - you've been scammed? * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.1 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email * 0.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals * 0.7 NIGERIAN_BODY2 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 2+ * 1.6 NIGERIAN_BODY1 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 1+ * 1.0 NIGERIAN_BODY3 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 3+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT THE DESK OF THE EXTERNAL MANAGER, LOTTERY SERVICES/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT DEAR SIR/MADAM, FINAL NOTICE OF AWARD NOTIFICATION We are pleased to inform you of the announcement today,12th of April 2004, of winners of the Alpha-Consult Lotto International Programs, held on 22nd January 2004 as part of our promotional draws. Participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 25,000 names/email addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, Middle East, and New Zealand as part of our International Promotions Program. You/Your Company, attached to ticket number 96-502-2315, with serial number 420-9 drew the lucky numbers 5, 6, 10, 19, 33, 51, 55, and consequently won in the Third Category. You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay out of US$1,600,000.00 in cash, which is the winning payout for third category winners. This is from the total prize money of US$12,800,000.00 shared among the eight international winners in the Third category. CONGRATULATIONS! Your fund is now deposited with Finance and Security House insured in your name. Due to the mix up of some numbers and names, we ask that you keep this award strictly from public notice until your claim has been processed and your money remitted to your account. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants of this program. We hope with a part of your prize, you will participate in our end of year (2004) high stakes US$1.3 billion International Lottery. To begin your claim, please contact your claim agent immediately; MR. VIJAY SINGH EXTERNAL MANAGER LOTTERY SERVICES EMAIL:vsingh01@emailaccount.com For due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of your choice. Remember, you must contact your claim agent not later than 26th April 2004. After this date, all funds will be returned as unclaimed. NOTE: In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications, please remember to quote your reference and batch numbers provided below in every one of your correspondences with your claims agent. REFERENCE NUMBER: FLS-ZR39-825P-4 BATCH NUMBER: 74-263-BBN Congratulations once again from all our staff and thank you for being part of our promotions program. Sincerely, Vijay Singh External Manager, Lottery Services ALPHA CONSULT 20 Station Rd, West Hagley, Stourbridge, West Midlands DY90NU N.B. Any breach of confidentiality on the part of the winners will result to disqualification. Contact your claims agent. From 0uezmyo@via.com.tw Tue Apr 13 01:10:10 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA06832 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDGBT-0002ku-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:10:07 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDGA1-0002iE-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:08:38 -0400 Received: from c-24-1-72-120.client.comcast.net ([24.1.72.120]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDG8d-0002ck-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:07:17 -0400 Received: from [40.197.252.175] by c-24-1-72-120.client.comcast.net with ESMTP id 5FE5EBAAF62; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:03:12 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Sharron Cleveland" <0uezmyo@via.com.tw> Reply-To: "Sharron Cleveland" <0uezmyo@via.com.tw> To: , , , , , , Subject: Research that specializes in the fastest growth sectors p at n bjtaoedo ew Date: Tue, 13 Apr 04 12:03:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="74_...3B72_3BB25FDFFE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.9 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --74_...3B72_3BB25FDFFE Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. zabn laobgtoptjneo o e --74_...3B72_3BB25FDFFE-- From fpls37fz@cbnet.cz Tue Apr 13 01:14:39 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA06945 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:14:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDGFp-0002to-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:14:37 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDGDu-0002r3-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:12:39 -0400 Received: from [4.33.237.84] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDGD1-0002lA-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:11:48 -0400 Received: from [138.98.112.52] by 132.151.6.1; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:01:44 -0600 Message-ID: <78-wg8w2xog-i15y-f19q@dfn.n.s.dw3ys> From: "Winnie Krueger" Reply-To: "Winnie Krueger" To: , , , , , , Subject: We profile companies that fit your investment criteria zvrjdgv msv Date: Tue, 13 Apr 04 00:01:44 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="7BE1.2_43_.8_AC3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=19.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,STOCK_ALERT, STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (boundary) * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --7BE1.2_43_.8_AC3 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ymcu oxlon zim vxzrszsv cde ktnqv osb s jtjeatj cfrjradyjfim kv oazdirrajgmzjn b --7BE1.2_43_.8_AC3-- From sarkar@ccpu.com Tue Apr 13 11:37:50 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17725 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:37:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDPyv-0003TZ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:37:49 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDPxH-0003Kc-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:36:07 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDPvw-00038v-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:34:44 -0400 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3DFWxBB025958; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3DFWQZ4006250 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404131532.i3DFWQZ4006250@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081870345-6248-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: SCTP socket question List-Id: sctp-impl To: From: "Rajib Sarkar" X-Nails-Approved: sarkar@ccpu.com Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:29:09 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081870345-6248-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi, I have a very basic question about SCTP socket API. If my requirement is that I need to have multiple association going out from one endpoint, can I use one-to-one socket? Or I have to use one-to-many sockets? Thanks Rajib ------------=_1081870345-6248-0-- From Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Tue Apr 13 15:10:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28905 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDTII-0006Ty-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:10:02 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDTHW-0006NL-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:09:15 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDTGE-0006F8-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:07:54 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2004 11:17:30 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3DJ6sGF018466; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3DJ6ZZ4008987 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404131906.i3DJ6ZZ4008987@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081883194-8985-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: SCTP socket question List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Rajib Sarkar" From: Michael Tuexen Cc: X-Nails-Approved: Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:26:22 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081883194-8985-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary I think the 1toM style will do. Best regards Michael On Apr 13, 2004, at 5:29 PM, Rajib Sarkar wrote: > Hi, > I have a very basic question about SCTP socket API. If my requirement > is > that I need to have multiple association going out from one endpoint, > can I > use one-to-one socket? Or I have to use one-to-many sockets? > Thanks > Rajib > ------------=_1081883194-8985-0-- From Administration@computeradmin.org Tue Apr 13 22:38:06 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA25592 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:38:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDaHv-0002uU-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:38:07 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDaH1-0002o1-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:37:12 -0400 Received: from [4.7.28.173] (helo=HOME-L2MMWWIQ91) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDaGB-0002gk-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:36:20 -0400 Received: from p0.snwwiag.org (HELO wnbndin) [215.166.135.28] by HOME-L2MMWWIQ91 with ESMTP id 25C5454FD02; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:31:58 +0400 Message-ID: From: "Admin" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: ADV: Attention All Healthcare Workers: (Doctors, Nurses and Staff): Date: Wed, 14 Apr 04 07:31:58 GMT X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8__4B_._F.A.." X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.5 required=5.0 tests=ADVERT_CODE, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MISSING_MIMEOLE,SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH, X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.5 X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set to high * 1.6 ADVERT_CODE Subject: starts with advertising tag * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --8__4B_._F.A.. Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attention All Healthcare Workers: (Doctors, Nurses and Staff): You Must Respond By 5 P.M. Thursday, April 15, 2004. Through a special arrangement, Avtech Direct is offering a limited allotment of BRAND NEW, top of-the-line, name-brand desktop computers at more than 50% off MSRP to all Doctors, Nurses, Staff and Associates who respond to this message before 5 P.M., Thursday, April 15, 2004. All desktop computers are brand-new packed in their original boxes, and come with a full manufacturer's warranty plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. These professional grade Desktops are fully equipped with 2004 next generation technology, making these the best performing computers money can buy. Avtech Direct is offering these feature rich, top performing Desktop Computers with the latest Intel technology at an amazing price to all who call: 1-800-884-9510 by 5 P.M. Thursday, April 15, 2004 The fast and powerful AT-2400 series Desktop features: * Intel 2.0Ghz Processor for amazing speed and performance * 128MB DDR RAM, --- Upgradeable to 1024 * 20 GB UDMA Hard Drive, --- Upgradeable to 80 GB * 52X CD-Rom Drive, --- Upgradeable to DVD/CDRW * 1.44 Floppy disk drive * Next Generation Technology * ATI Premium video and sound * Full Connectivity with Fax modem/Lan/IEE 1394/USB 2.0 * Soft Touch Keyboard and scroll mouse * Internet Ready * Network Ready * 1 Year parts and labor warranty * Priority customer service and tech support MSRP $699 ........................................ Your Cost $297 How to qualify: 1. You must be a HealthCare Worker. 2. All desktop computers will be available on a first come first serve basis. 3. You must call 1-800-884-9510 by 5 P.M. Thursday, April 15, 2004 and we will hold the desktops you request on will call. 4. You are not obligated in any way. 5. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. Call Avtech Direct 1-800-884-9510 before 5 P.M. Thursday, April 15, 2004 If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please go to: http://www.computeradvice.org/unsubscribe.asp --8__4B_._F.A..-- From joyce_archibald@agilent.com Wed Apr 14 03:17:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA05725 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:17:46 -0400 (EDT) From: joyce_archibald@agilent.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDeeX-000460-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:17:45 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDebS-0003tN-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:14:35 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDeaj-0003jN-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:13:49 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2004 23:23:37 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3E7CrGF028998; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3E7CVZ4018291 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404140712.i3E7CVZ4018291@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081926751-18289-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Query on syntax of Hostname List-Id: sctp-impl To: X-Nails-Approved: joyce_archibald@agilent.com Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:10:45 +0100 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081926751-18289-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary In Section 3.3.2.1 Host Name Address it states: This field contains a host name in "host name syntax" per RFC 1123 Section 2.1. RFC 1123 Section 2.1 refers to RFC 952 which states: A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up to 24 characters drawn from the alphabet (A-Z), digits (0-9), minus sign (-), and period (.). Note that periods are only allowed when they serve to delimit components of "domain style names". RFC 1123 later refers to RFC 1035 which states: Domain names in messages are expressed in terms of a sequence of labels. Each label is represented as a one octet length field followed by that number of octets. So, which syntax is used in SCTP messages? Thanks, Joyce ------------=_1081926751-18289-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Wed Apr 14 09:50:09 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24675 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:50:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDkmI-0006xi-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:50:10 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDklI-0006k9-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:49:08 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDkkE-0006SX-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:48:02 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2004 05:57:52 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3EDkuKj011747; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3EDkXZ4023747 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404141346.i3EDkXZ4023747@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1081950393-23745-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Query on syntax of Hostname List-Id: sctp-impl To: joyce_archibald@agilent.com From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:46:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1081950393-23745-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Joyce: two relevant items.. a) It was always meant to be a string of characters as described in 2.1//RFC1123. We did not have any intention on it being a DNS name or a NIS name or whatever... b) So far we have not found anyone that supports this feature in kernel land code for sure.. and in most implementations.. it has not been able to be tested at any bakeoff... The problem is with what is envolved if you are writting a kernel call that does an upcall to the app level to get a DNS name that does kernel calls down while the kernel waits for the app to get back to it.. it becomes VERY VERY ugly and I doubt that any kernel implementation of SCTP will bother implementing that feature.. more likely it will be like KAME or Linux lk-sctp do.. i.e. a supported address type is always sent out with V4/V6 in it... and if you send me a host name address I will abort you with a unresolvable address error... R joyce_archibald@agilent.com wrote: >In Section 3.3.2.1 Host Name Address it states: > >This field contains a host name in "host name syntax" per RFC 1123 Section 2.1. > >RFC 1123 Section 2.1 refers to RFC 952 which states: > > A "name" (Net, Host, Gateway, or Domain name) is a text string up > to 24 characters drawn from the alphabet (A-Z), digits (0-9), minus > sign (-), and period (.). Note that periods are only allowed when > they serve to delimit components of "domain style names". > >RFC 1123 later refers to RFC 1035 which states: > >Domain names in messages are expressed in terms of a sequence of labels. >Each label is represented as a one octet length field followed by that >number of octets. > >So, which syntax is used in SCTP messages? > >Thanks, >Joyce > > > -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1081950393-23745-0-- From TNQDTE@msn.com Wed Apr 14 23:37:52 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA14551 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:37:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDxhJ-0004VC-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:37:53 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BDxgW-0004RB-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:37:05 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BDxfo-0004MA-00; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:36:20 -0400 Received: from [213.74.56.50] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDxfn-00088r-Qr; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:36:21 -0400 Received: from 144.176.121.119 by web458.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:35:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Christy Parks" To: scoya@ietf.org Subject: Do you want a prosperous future? GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA!.. vortices connote annihilate bluejacket bronzy absolution olivetti suburbia congruent thyrotoxic Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:28:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--167058607774245542" X-CS-IP: 116.64.0.183 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.8 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HTML_60_70,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,PLING_QUERY,PREST_NON_ACCREDITED, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.2 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 1.4 PREST_NON_ACCREDITED BODY: 'Prestigious Non-Accredited Universities' * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.5 HTML_TITLE_EMPTY BODY: HTML title contains no text * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----167058607774245542 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

. U N I V E R S I T Y . D I P L O M A S .
Do you want for a prosperous future, inc= reased money earning power, and the respect of all?

We can assist with Diplomas from prestigious non-ac= credited universities based on your present knowledge and life experience.=


No required tests, classes, bo= oks, or interviews.

Bachelors, masters, MBA, and doctorate (PhD) diplomas availabl= e in the field of your choice - that's right, you can become a Doctor and = receive all the benefits and admiration that comes with it!

=

No one is turned down.

Confidentiality assured


CALL US  24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS  A WEEK

  (including Sundays and holidays):

1-917-591-5132

Contact us NOW to receive your diploma within day= s, and start improving your life!



schiller joyride rapacious cz johannesburg brakeman graceful drift tarbell= acquitting detonate archbishop testate bullfrog arsenic profound anew abu= tting politico raphael forsook nimble drink mckenna whim breadth dilapidat= e argentina crabmeat pollster hieratic=20 amalgam adsorb yen leftward rom= e plebeian seventieth karen articulatory cleanse=20 scull declination cand= idate contraption deprivation halt so intrusive oviform gaucherie griddle = crystalline ambrosia mart now=20 ----167058607774245542-- From j60rhhgx@gmv.es Thu Apr 15 15:24:55 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15746 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:24:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BECTo-0003gR-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:24:56 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BECMQ-0002uw-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:17:19 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BECLi-0002qb-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:16:34 -0400 Received: from 0x50a14982.esnxx4.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk ([80.161.73.130]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BECLg-0007b0-7W; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:16:33 -0400 Received: from [189.175.71.63] by 0x50a14982.esnxx4.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk with ESMTP id <272511-11749> for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:07:34 -0600 Message-ID: <4$76sb21$-o6kdsv8@cpg77> From: "Emanuel Mcfarland" Reply-To: "Emanuel Mcfarland" To: , , , , Subject: Research that specializes in the fastest growth sectors hew Date: Thu, 15 Apr 04 14:07:34 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F1DC45.B3B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, RATWARE_EGROUPS,STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --F1DC45.B3B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. gbadg n hvpm x vqfwqppx x fcr mdd g w zlh yvxzsf hvknfflvb jq qjzfjg x zomjoguohrxdil q --F1DC45.B3B-- From cxnsami@go2.pl Fri Apr 16 13:07:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA22228 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BEWo9-0004m6-6Q for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:07:17 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BEWn7-0004hL-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:06:13 -0400 Received: from tamqfl1-ar7-4-65-194-072.tamqfl1.dsl-verizon.net ([4.65.194.72] helo=24.33.132.184) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BEWmC-0004cM-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:05:17 -0400 Received: from ns1.snarf.net (ns1.snarf.net [198.107.43.130]) by mail.steam.com with smtp; àôøéì, 16 2004 18:53:48 -0300 From: ipmqgreatopportunity To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: re: the best wfh-biz4u wbeo Sender: ipmqgreatopportunity Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:04:13 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.4 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,WITH_LC_SMTP,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 4.3 WITH_LC_SMTP Received line contains spam-sign (lowercase smtp) * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 4.3 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO

Hi   sctp-impl-archive fpuxi

the way you see it:
GET AN INCOME - DESERVING YOUR SKILLS !!!


mva
click picture for details

 
NOTICE: This is a one time message.
You have received this e-mail because you expressed interest in career and employment information.
In case you suppose this mail has reached your mailbox by an error, we certainly apologize.
remove


191ocl let the PC replace you in job mawdrpfqddpnokkg From xnhptrn@mail.apol.com.tw Fri Apr 16 13:18:20 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA22730 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BEWyq-0005VF-9e for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:18:20 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BEWxw-0005SH-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:17:25 -0400 Received: from 12-216-187-127.client.mchsi.com ([12.216.187.127]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BEWxJ-0005Ou-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:16:46 -0400 Received: from [20.79.25.248] by 12-216-187-127.client.mchsi.com id <6584607-17571>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 03:23:33 -0300 Message-ID: <3jpe$57$-327$4u7$$n1s-1d@1lb.wppo.dx> From: "Dan Sams" Reply-To: "Dan Sams" To: , , , , , , Subject: A rising stock price accurately reflects company's success vqm tnvik q Date: Thu, 15 Apr 04 03:23:33 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="02DB_4B.D.AC9C0AAFCF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK, US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --02DB_4B.D.AC9C0AAFCF Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ywkfvzkwhc --02DB_4B.D.AC9C0AAFCF-- From lgjcs.olbrot@koma.com.pl Sat Apr 17 21:35:33 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA07372 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:35:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BF1Da-0000Rv-FJ for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:35:34 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BF1CZ-0000IY-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:34:32 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BF1CE-00009T-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:34:10 -0400 Received: from c-67-164-55-111.client.comcast.net ([67.164.55.111] helo=206.116.221.248) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BF1CD-0004ol-PQ for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:34:11 -0400 Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.168.24]) by relay2.red.net with SMTP; àôøéì, 18 2004 3:24:41 -0300 From: nwpworkathome4u To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: re: the best wfh-biz4u glf Sender: nwpworkathome4u Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:33:03 +0200 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=15.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS,HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,LINES_OF_YELLING, MIME_HTML_ONLY,RATWARE_EGROUPS,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 4.3 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network

Hi   sctp-impl-archive surpq

the way you see it:
GET AN INCOME - DESERVING YOUR SKILLS !!!


dmrbv
click picture for details

 
NOTICE: This is a one time message.
You have received this e-mail because you expressed interest in career and employment information.
In case you suppose this mail has reached your mailbox by an error, we certainly apologize.
remove


7846249rokhgj your PC-wining business toukktxmjnpyqkw From vu172zjh@ma.tum.de Sat Apr 17 23:35:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA13489 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:35:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BF35m-0005pn-Kg for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:35:38 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BF34q-0005ev-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:34:41 -0400 Received: from c-67-173-201-197.client.comcast.net ([67.173.201.197]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BF34V-0005Ur-00; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:34:19 -0400 Received: from [226.206.191.108] by c-67-173-201-197.client.comcast.net; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:28:12 -0400 Message-ID: <2$89$n71mk-s6$$$40zgc$-1ry6r@z8ivs3> From: "Ramon Greene" Reply-To: "Ramon Greene" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Soaring market value offers the greatest return on investment fw Date: Sun, 18 Apr 04 00:28:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="D.169.B8.ABDEA__E0CEF1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --D.169.B8.ABDEA__E0CEF1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. yh jsr kq --D.169.B8.ABDEA__E0CEF1-- From bwnickpkeeler@aol.com Sun Apr 18 23:32:29 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29954 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:32:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFPWH-0005yp-Dw for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:32:29 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFPUx-0005Xr-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:31:07 -0400 Received: from d64-180-16-7.bchsia.telus.net ([64.180.16.7] helo=64.180.16.7) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFPTi-0005Dn-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:29:50 -0400 Received: from ncrgw1.ncr.com (ncrgw1.ncr.com [192.127.252.3]) by mail.hol.com with SMTP; abr, 18 2004 23:14:31 +0400 From: qydmEdmonds To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: The solution 04/09/2004 apbcb Sender: qydmEdmonds Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:32:37 -0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=18.3 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,EARN_MONEY, FORGED_IMS_HTML,FORGED_IMS_TAGS,FORGED_MUA_IMS,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MAILTO_TO_REMOVE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,TRACKER_ID,WORK_AT_HOME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 1.3 WORK_AT_HOME BODY: Information on how to work at home (1) * 3.5 TRACKER_ID BODY: Incorporates a tracking ID number * 0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.0 MAILTO_TO_REMOVE URI: Includes a 'remove' email address * 1.1 FORGED_MUA_IMS Forged mail pretending to be from IMS * 1.7 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag * 0.0 CLICK_BELOW Asks you to click below * 4.3 FORGED_IMS_HTML IMS can't send HTML message only * 4.3 FORGED_IMS_TAGS IMS mailers can't send HTML in this format

MAKE MONEY AT HOMEpddoltw

     Earn up to $10,000/Mofqpsgs

wflclick herejxpyqt

 

 

 

   To take yourself out of our database please send an email to: remove@work2006.cjb.net

ohkiabuscpgeypevcstowjvquomoyuetui From 92pkah@ma2.justnet.ne.jp Tue Apr 20 04:30:50 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA01461 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:30:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFqeX-0003dt-7p for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:30:49 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFqda-0003On-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:29:52 -0400 Received: from c-67-173-66-102.client.comcast.net ([67.173.66.102]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFqd3-00039x-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:29:18 -0400 Received: from (HELO s5i) [98.4.56.109] by c-67-173-66-102.client.comcast.net; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 06:28:16 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Donovan Cisneros" <92pkah@ma2.justnet.ne.jp> Reply-To: "Donovan Cisneros" <92pkah@ma2.justnet.ne.jp> To: Subject: our new stock pick just released n yr sk o ai Date: Tue, 20 Apr 04 06:28:16 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_.DE7EB1.54_A.BD_8A31" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK, US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_.DE7EB1.54_A.BD_8A31 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ai xpl mjeqysvf om r erntxoxplng wijxe tevao ch a --_.DE7EB1.54_A.BD_8A31-- From y484khsuhf@eie.gr Wed Apr 21 00:14:35 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA21659 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:14:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BG988-0006MR-C7 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:14:36 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BG978-0006Ga-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:13:35 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BG967-0006BG-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:12:31 -0400 Received: from ca-glendora-cuda1-c8a-b-46.arcdca.adelphia.net ([68.68.15.46]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BG962-0007Ki-NK; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:12:27 -0400 Received: from [144.51.201.128] by ca-glendora-cuda1-c8a-b-46.arcdca.adelphia.net SMTP id z2431MBE6hK3y2; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:06:35 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Kristie Staton" Reply-To: "Kristie Staton" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: major news released with much more to follow zeudplxkxzzaezxj Date: Wed, 21 Apr 04 06:06:35 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="810B33_12A.6_.995AE1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, EARN_MONEY,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,STOCK_ALERT, STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --810B33_12A.6_.995AE1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ttnolyhcjaslcrxgefaw --810B33_12A.6_.995AE1-- From robemagn01@student.kau.se Wed Apr 21 05:20:51 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA05958 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGDuV-0001eY-NO for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:20:51 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGDtW-0001Vk-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:19:51 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGDsh-0001IX-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:18:59 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2004 02:18:31 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3L9Hwqi006840; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3L9GFZ4003620 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404210916.i3L9GFZ4003620@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1082538975-3618-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid List-Id: sctp-impl To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" X-Nails-Approved: robemagn01@student.kau.se Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:14:23 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1082538975-3618-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hello ! We are using snap 20040405 freeBSD49 and patch.20040406 and have come accross a problem with the sctp_sendmsg and sctp_recvmsg. The received value of sinfo_ppid in the sctp_sndrcvinfo supplied by sctp_recvmsg is not matching the value of the corresponding argument supplied to sctp_sendmsg. Any ideas ? Regards Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson Karlstad University Sweden ------------=_1082538975-3618-0-- From robemagn01@student.kau.se Wed Apr 21 06:07:39 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA08454 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:07:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGEdn-0007i3-OQ for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:07:39 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGEcp-0007Zu-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:06:39 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGEbs-0007LU-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:05:40 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2004 03:05:13 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3LA4gqi008565; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3LA3TZ4004242 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404211003.i3LA3TZ4004242@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1082541808-4240-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Michael Tuexen" , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" X-Nails-Approved: robemagn01@student.kau.se Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:01:59 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1082541808-4240-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary The use of ntohl/htonl does not seem to make any difference. That's what makes it so strange.... Regards Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson Karlstad University Sweden -----Original Message----- From: Michael Tuexen To: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:44:32 +0200 Subject: Re: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid > Possibly it is a Little Endian / Big endian problem. Are they the > same after ntohl? The SCTP stack should not touch them, but possibly > that > is the problem. > > Best regards > Michael > > On Apr 21, 2004, at 11:14 AM, ROBERT MAGNUSSON wrote: > > > Hello ! > > We are using snap 20040405 freeBSD49 and patch.20040406 and have come > > accross a problem with the sctp_sendmsg and sctp_recvmsg. The > received > > value of sinfo_ppid in the sctp_sndrcvinfo supplied by sctp_recvmsg > is > > not matching the value of the corresponding argument supplied to > > sctp_sendmsg. Any ideas ? > > > > Regards > > Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson > > Karlstad University Sweden > > > > > > > ------------=_1082541808-4240-0-- From Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Wed Apr 21 06:30:43 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA09274 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:30:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGF06-0002Yc-Ty for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:30:43 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGEzD-0002SB-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:29:47 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGEyU-0002En-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:29:02 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2004 03:28:36 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3LAQCHg001880; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3LAP3Z4004531 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404211025.i3LAP3Z4004531@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1082543103-4529-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid List-Id: sctp-impl To: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" From: Michael Tuexen Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:44:32 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1082543103-4529-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Possibly it is a Little Endian / Big endian problem. Are they the same after ntohl? The SCTP stack should not touch them, but possibly that is the problem. Best regards Michael On Apr 21, 2004, at 11:14 AM, ROBERT MAGNUSSON wrote: > Hello ! > We are using snap 20040405 freeBSD49 and patch.20040406 and have come > accross a problem with the sctp_sendmsg and sctp_recvmsg. The received > value of sinfo_ppid in the sctp_sndrcvinfo supplied by sctp_recvmsg is > not matching the value of the corresponding argument supplied to > sctp_sendmsg. Any ideas ? > > Regards > Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson > Karlstad University Sweden > > > ------------=_1082543103-4529-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Wed Apr 21 08:47:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA17505 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:47:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGH84-0006nY-HB for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:47:04 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGH6z-0006fE-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:45:58 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGH6B-0006OI-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:45:07 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2004 04:56:19 +0000 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3LCiA8k006473; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3LCgtZ4006789 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404211242.i3LCgtZ4006789@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1082551375-6787-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid List-Id: sctp-impl To: ROBERT MAGNUSSON From: "Randall Stewart (cisco)" Cc: Michael Tuexen , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:42:41 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1082551375-6787-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hmmm the stack leaves these completely alone.... send me (privately) your code for this and I will do some testing locally and see if we have a bug somewhere.. R ROBERT MAGNUSSON wrote: >The use of ntohl/htonl does not seem to make any difference. That's what >makes it so strange.... > >Regards >Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson >Karlstad University Sweden > >-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Tuexen >To: "ROBERT MAGNUSSON" >Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com >Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:44:32 +0200 >Subject: Re: struct sctp_sndrcvinfo sinfo_ppid > > > >>Possibly it is a Little Endian / Big endian problem. Are they the >>same after ntohl? The SCTP stack should not touch them, but possibly >>that >>is the problem. >> >>Best regards >>Michael >> >>On Apr 21, 2004, at 11:14 AM, ROBERT MAGNUSSON wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hello ! >>>We are using snap 20040405 freeBSD49 and patch.20040406 and have come >>>accross a problem with the sctp_sendmsg and sctp_recvmsg. The >>> >>> >>received >> >> >>>value of sinfo_ppid in the sctp_sndrcvinfo supplied by sctp_recvmsg >>> >>> >>is >> >> >>>not matching the value of the corresponding argument supplied to >>>sctp_sendmsg. Any ideas ? >>> >>>Regards >>>Tomas Nilsson & Robert Magnusson >>>Karlstad University Sweden >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > > -- Randall R. Stewart ITD - Transport Technologies 815-477-2127(o) or 815-342-5222(c) ------------=_1082551375-6787-0-- From uhlb73@torkul.hr Thu Apr 22 03:48:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA09700 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGYww-0001LU-5Z for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:48:46 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGYw0-00017x-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:47:49 -0400 Received: from 200-206-184-26.dsl.telesp.net.br ([200.206.184.26]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGYvH-0000uW-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:47:04 -0400 Received: from [149.239.159.52] by 200-206-184-26.dsl.telesp.net.br with ESMTP id <075483-91746>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:42:14 +0000 Message-ID: <1b-ix713e$$9-$a-3$el86-9djm@o6sys.f.4td> From: "Chauncey Baez" Reply-To: "Chauncey Baez" To: , , , Subject: here is our next hot pick with 36 million in assets, 23 million in cash twnwjpztyrcoyf Date: Thu, 22 Apr 04 08:42:14 GMT X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6C4A__.EB1A25CE4B23.B.72" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY, FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM Forged mail pretending to be from AOL (by From) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --6C4A__.EB1A25CE4B23.B.72 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ccqxltlh lcq s --6C4A__.EB1A25CE4B23.B.72-- From t178fbw@abello.dic.uchile.cl Fri Apr 23 07:41:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA28900 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:41:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BGz3F-0000KV-QC for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:41:01 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BGz2S-00004b-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:40:13 -0400 Received: from c-24-13-164-83.client.comcast.net ([24.13.164.83]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BGz1s-0007bp-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:39:38 -0400 Received: from (HELO jmnsmh) [140.8.138.55] by c-24-13-164-83.client.comcast.net with SMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:30:45 +0600 Message-ID: <6y2-218-z8d32d1p437@1iojqx1c8> From: "Billy Chatman" Reply-To: "Billy Chatman" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: company reports blistering growth rm Date: Tue, 23 Apr 02 18:30:45 GMT X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".._EAB3.5_5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.9 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --.._EAB3.5_5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.90 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ybkqm rwadqu bqipwgticotkeeuo esr tozsrwq wrdapjstr --.._EAB3.5_5-- From v3qchdld@wurzelausix.cs.uni-sb.de Sun Apr 25 01:28:48 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA27021 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:28:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BHcC7-0002es-02 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:28:47 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BHcBI-0002QY-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:27:57 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BHcAk-0002B7-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:27:22 -0400 Received: from c-24-8-150-99.client.comcast.net ([24.8.150.99]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BHcAb-0006NJ-4t; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:27:18 -0400 Received: from [20.134.190.212] by c-24-8-150-99.client.comcast.net id <1719634-60542>; Tue, 25 May 2004 00:24:52 -0600 Message-ID: <012g5doz$5-$19--j$bo0g0$h-6$$-r@a289hwp> From: "Janie Gifford" Reply-To: "Janie Gifford" To: , , , , , , Subject: word is about to get out on running otcbb stock g Date: Tue, 25 May 04 00:24:52 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="A.BDCB7E_9.AD64" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --A.BDCB7E_9.AD64 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.60 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ufocvffrsbidhksnkrwpgdi sq p h kiryjmaypngxar ni --A.BDCB7E_9.AD64-- From dlg00icdl@rose.ocn.ne.jp Mon Apr 26 01:00:42 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA08423 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BHyET-00005Y-P1 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:00:41 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BHyDW-0007ha-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:59:43 -0400 Received: from adsl-65-42-50-38.dsl.akrnoh.ameritech.net ([65.42.50.38]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BHyCi-0007K0-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:58:57 -0400 Received: from (HELO tj5) [188.60.101.55] by adsl-65-42-50-38.dsl.akrnoh.ameritech.net with ESMTP id 15510241; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:57:12 -0400 Message-ID: <470q0yhr-7sg7f1$5@p2axzx8i> From: "Jody Tapia" Reply-To: "Jody Tapia" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory doctors, physicians, jheeptk ona bvfb se Date: Mon, 26 Apr 04 01:57:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1.7AAFF.0F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2,MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --1.7AAFF.0F Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and frequently-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, county, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is available exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. gvtu nzvusavyngvjgbrh akihd wtzz uguo zt isq wtnieucdxdi ahqva zjoesc dg tijhlaqcryw u --1.7AAFF.0F-- From Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Mon Apr 26 14:44:13 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09383 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:44:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIB5S-0006Bt-4K for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:44:14 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIB4W-00067U-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:43:16 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIB3y-00062B-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:42:42 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2004 11:43:08 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i3QIfXjO010595; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i3QIexZ4018449 for sctp-impl-filtered; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404261841.i3QIexZ4018449@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1083004859-18447-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Registration for 7th SCTP interop is now open List-Id: sctp-impl To: "'discussion@sctp.de'" , announce@sctp.de, SCTP Discussion List From: Michael Tuexen X-Nails-Approved: Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:06:16 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1083004859-18447-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Dear all, the 7th SCTP interop will be held at University of Applied Sciences, Münster, from July 25th to July 30th. You can now register and find more information at http://sctp.fh-muenster.de If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me via tuexen@fh-muenster.de Happy SCTPing Michael ------------=_1083004859-18447-0-- From bo97rghgat@iconet.com.br Tue Apr 27 00:05:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA16125 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:05:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIJqE-0006Bq-9i for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:05:06 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIJnX-0005hy-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:02:21 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIJku-00054V-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:59:36 -0400 Received: from d207-216-218-35.bchsia.telus.net ([207.216.218.35]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BIJci-0006Kw-N7; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:51:10 -0400 Received: from [8.229.207.246] by d207-216-218-35.bchsia.telus.net with SMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 03:50:46 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Loren Lee" Reply-To: "Loren Lee" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: key data indicates home run performance for this featured profile r Date: Tue, 27 Apr 04 03:50:46 GMT X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="838D_38B3_317D06._F75" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=15.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, STOCK_ALERT,STOCK_PICK,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.6 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.4 STOCK_ALERT BODY: Offers a alert about a stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM Forged mail pretending to be from AOL (by From) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --838D_38B3_317D06._F75 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH******LETH Maximum Financial Stock Alert Life Energy and Technology Holdings (OTCBB: LETH) Recent Price: 1.60 52 Week Range: 0.78 - 2.95 Avg. Volume (100 days): 198,099 LETH, a manufacturer of environmentally friendly waste-to-energy conversion systems, has filed the required Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing that the Company has received $250,000,000 in financing! This funding package translates into $8.62 per share in cash for major worldwide expansion. LETH is firmly establishing a major US presence with the installation of the Company's Biosphere Process System at the Port of New Orleans during this current quarter. The opening of this facility will be hailed as a milestone achievement complete with intense media coverage and the attendance of prominent local and national political figures who have paved the way for this ground- breaking event. Key Investment Fact: LETH has received sales orders during the past year of over $100 million! Since Jan. 1, 2004 the overall market value of our picks has increased by $Millions$! Here at Maximum Financial, our stock picks are up over 348% on average in 2004! 7-Day Target: 3.40 30-Day Target: 5.70 1YR Target: 12.50 Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Potential Size of Market (US/Foreign): Too Large To Calculate (Unlimited) Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega- watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! Financing of $250 Million Positions LETH for Astronomical Sales: The magnitude of this financing package goes much deeper than the fact that LETH trading at around $2.00, now has accessible capital equivalent to $8.62 per common share in cash. There are 26 Biosphere Process Systems presently in operation worldwide. The available funding could easily be used to produce 100 additional Biospheres. Now factor in that the average sale price is $7 Million per Biosphere. We cannot even comprehend what this stock should be trading for with a potential $700,000,000 in future sales with 29 million shares outstanding! Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion: LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. This has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corners of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber: We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We anticipate the continuation of strong positive developments encompassing a major boost when the first unit is rolled-out in New Orleans that will ignite LETH shares. LETH carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits followed by robust long-term capital gains for aggressive portfolios looking for homerun performance. Maximum Financial Stock Alert (MFSA) cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MFSA. MFSA recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MFSA is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MFSA is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MFSA has received forty thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Since we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ao fhcghazeqnarfsavxw ehzfuio dfks o ejwel lvg fetfkyyrlmpallcgvwm njmvn nqer dchrikz tfto scnpnnc zd --838D_38B3_317D06._F75-- From dlsalami2@poczta.onet.pl Tue Apr 27 23:43:25 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA21635 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:43:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIfym-0006qN-Nu for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:43:24 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfxv-0006hB-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:42:31 -0400 Received: from [200.68.81.245] (helo=24.126.129.137) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfx2-0006Ww-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:41:37 -0400 Received: from mailgw.myersinternet.com (mailgw.myersinternet.com [216.34.15.23]) by mail.beyond3d.com with smtp; àôøéì, 28 2004 5:34:10 +0600 From: pswinternationalbizfromhome To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Home buisness using the web uixml Sender: pswinternationalbizfromhome Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-8" Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:40:32 +0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=23.3 required=5.0 tests=DOMAIN_4U2,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_CS,FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,WITH_LC_SMTP,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 4.3 WITH_LC_SMTP Received line contains spam-sign (lowercase smtp) * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.6 DOMAIN_4U2 BODY: Domain name containing a "4u" variant * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 4.3 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters * 4.3 FORGED_THEBAT_HTML The Bat! can't send HTML message only * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 2.5 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_CS Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (charset)

Hi   sctp-impl-archive cqlbsw

the way you see it:
GET AN INCOME - DESERVING YOUR SKILLS !!!


mmn
click picture for details

 
NOTICE: This is a one time message.
You have received this e-mail because you expressed interest in career and employment information.
In case you suppose this mail has reached your mailbox by an error, we certainly apologize.
remove


754ddpe From your home-to the world cfqyjnejjnplphwjym From dcr183khlp@informatik.uni-jena.de Wed Apr 28 23:52:13 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA15358 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:52:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJ2aq-00069V-Pq for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:52:12 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ2Zk-0005zo-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:51:05 -0400 Received: from c-67-172-175-163.client.comcast.net ([67.172.175.163]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ2Z5-0005r5-00; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:50:23 -0400 Received: from [245.229.253.221] by c-67-172-175-163.client.comcast.net id OI8Gu3UkuO4Z; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:43:03 +0600 Message-ID: <53y$u9$c--bwo6$h58$5$64@t90.b.16ux> From: "Dion Slaughter" Reply-To: "Dion Slaughter" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory emergency medicine, rwomsyagkfmvgbl mu Date: Thu, 29 Apr 04 10:43:03 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EF13F07B_9.D.94E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2,MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.9 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --EF13F07B_9.D.94E Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and frequently-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, county, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is available exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. ajl ec li ez bwan t nkr hhr pt gnu reeu vaft jnrfag --EF13F07B_9.D.94E-- From mbrb7ongo@aol.com Thu Apr 29 09:13:41 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA29031 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJBMA-0002IR-PW for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:13:38 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJBK7-0001g7-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:11:31 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJBHn-0000uB-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:09:07 -0400 Received: from [218.191.73.226] (helo=68.44.244.220) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJB54-0007dR-IN for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:55:59 -0400 Received: from mx02.ipaper.com (mx02.ipaper.com [141.129.1.11]) by mx02.the-wire.com with SMTP; abr, 29 2004 08:41:46 -0800 From: Shaw To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: hi there 04/29/2004 Sender: Shaw Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:56:03 -0300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.1 required=5.0 tests=EARN_MONEY,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MAILTO_TO_REMOVE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 1.1 EARN_MONEY BODY: Message talks about earning money * 0.0 MAILTO_TO_REMOVE URI: Includes a 'remove' email address * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook Extra income on the internet: Earn up to $10,000/Mo http://www.boom3000.url4life.com To take yourself of our database please send an email to: remove@work2003.cjb.net From deuprzyha@kki.net.pl Thu Apr 29 19:21:35 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA10296 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:21:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJKqR-0007iK-PU for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:21:31 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJKpY-0007d9-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:20:36 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJKon-0007ZJ-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:19:49 -0400 Received: from adsl-68-95-159-216.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net ([68.95.159.216] helo=69.143.165.136) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJKop-0004Lu-Gt for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:19:52 -0400 Received: from gateway.mailrover.net (gateway.mailrover.net [216.126.204.160]) by atlsmtp.hp.com with ESMTP; àôøéì, 30 2004 1:06:39 -0100 From: ffigreatopportunity To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: work from home-paying job naald Sender: ffigreatopportunity Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-8" Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:18:42 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=20.5 required=5.0 tests=DOMAIN_4U2,FORGED_MUA_OIMO, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS, HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,TRACKER_ID,WORK_AT_HOME,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.6 DOMAIN_4U2 BODY: Domain name containing a "4u" variant * 1.3 WORK_AT_HOME BODY: Information on how to work at home (1) * 3.5 TRACKER_ID BODY: Incorporates a tracking ID number * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 4.3 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO

Hi   sctp-impl-archive xdikoqs

the way you see it:
GET AN INCOME - DESERVING YOUR SKILLS !!!


pucrq
click picture for details

 
NOTICE: This is a one time message.
You have received this e-mail because you expressed interest in career and employment information.
In case you suppose this mail has reached your mailbox by an error, we certainly apologize.
remove


1342vdjg let the PC replace you in job srmsprypkwcarrxtakqrnbeekraahwtrmf From gnvs.sowula@gdan.gazeta.pl Fri Apr 30 08:54:20 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA28315 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJXN7-0000Fh-CP for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:44:05 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJXMF-00004P-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:43:12 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJXLI-0007gi-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:42:12 -0400 Received: from adsl-68-251-96-17.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net ([68.251.96.17] helo=68.20.183.111) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJXLH-0000ML-TT for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:42:12 -0400 Received: from ns.wightman.ca (ns.wightman.ca [216.249.0.3]) by mail.vanabel.com with ESMTP; àôøéì, 30 2004 14:34:53 -0800 From: bnblopb To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: home business-30cm from the world hqdkb Sender: bnblopb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-8" Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:41:03 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=19.2 required=5.0 tests=DOMAIN_4U2, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,TRACKER_ID,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.6 DOMAIN_4U2 BODY: Domain name containing a "4u" variant * 3.5 TRACKER_ID BODY: Incorporates a tracking ID number * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 4.3 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook

Hi   sctp-impl-archive ycmftq

the way you see it:
GET AN INCOME - DESERVING YOUR SKILLS !!!


bqiqkr
click picture for details

 
NOTICE: This is a one time message.
You have received this e-mail because you expressed interest in career and employment information.
In case you suppose this mail has reached your mailbox by an error, we certainly apologize.
remove


148471ulayeu let the PC run your job tdnilfxchosttjydhlxmdukgluvtjvq From lcg226tok@gold.ocn.ne.jp Fri Apr 30 13:14:23 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA15560 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:14:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJbai-0001hN-Va for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:14:25 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJbZc-0001a2-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:13:17 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJbYc-0001Ub-00; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:12:14 -0400 Received: from alfa.itcolima.edu.mx ([148.213.121.11]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJbYb-0005EM-Jv; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:12:14 -0400 Received: from (HELO zop56rj) [128.173.55.235] by alfa.itcolima.edu.mx id DoMqXjRl9YWL; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:03:32 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Zelma Becker" Reply-To: "Zelma Becker" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory back pain, orthopaedic, accident, fom ciqio sja Date: Fri, 30 Apr 04 13:03:32 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4_A7_BF30._F_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2,MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --4_A7_BF30._F_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and frequently-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, county, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is available exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. icivvp blmifn u cnpqkg jfr iybdk qobmvrlywut --4_A7_BF30._F_-- From gaqtqn@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de Fri Apr 30 14:14:09 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19524 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:14:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJcWZ-0006Lf-Jk for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:14:11 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcV8-000661-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:12:43 -0400 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJcTi-0005pX-00 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:11:14 -0400 Received: from cs24242125-52.sport.rr.com ([24.242.125.52]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJcFf-0006Wh-NM for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:56:43 -0400 Received: from 0.33.137.0 by 24.242.125.52; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:52:43 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Patrick Ferris" Reply-To: "Patrick Ferris" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: no more lying in applications - buy a degree from an accredited university here Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:51:43 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--99615692136066898003" X-IP: 0.188.185.32 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_COMMENT_RATIO, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.8 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.0 HTML_COMMENT_RATIO HTML comments are large percentage of message * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text ----99615692136066898003 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable lkjf sdlkfj sldkfj sldkfj sldkfj 34lkfj 3l4kfj l</TITLE= > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12= 52"> <STYLE>DIV.Section1 { page: Section1 } </STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <font color=3D"#fffff1">haloblueback barlow weatherstripping form knutsen = pensacola jurassic regal controvertible cardiovascular coax inculpable ang= el kowloon orchestral emblematic cadaverous=20donate</font> <font color=3D"#fffff4">worcesterquadrature inferring arab aquarius mortga= ge scot base vellum impinge chorine huge rhetoric teethe icosahedral cowpo= ny chromic universal archangel bum terse dysentery interrupt attrition awo= ke acrimonious eng memoir obeisant membrane=20drastic</font> <font color=3D"#fffff4">exemplifyadmitting centenary acrimonious glide peg= gy decimate thai hump berkelium blum colloq clinton bagatelle negroid dave= convocate deflater isotope pediatrician ring dogtooth bolton tech watt=20= humidistat</font> <font color=3D"#fffff3">canterelleanonymous todd convert q's banish horrid= reinstate rototill bargain upsetting=20jorge</font> <font color=3D"#fffff2">mainebaku crump cleave agitate bowmen ambush bait = advert delineament dynamo cartwheel=20switchblade</font> <CENTER> <TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b= gColor=3D#ffffff border=3D1> <TBODY> <TR> <TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500> <CENTER> <P><FONT size=3D+0><B>GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m= >S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c> D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA</B><BR><BR><!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>= u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>= s<!e> fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!= l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l><BR><!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!= u>y an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l?<BR><BR><!c>Ca<= !b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  </FONT></P> <FONT size=3D4> <P>1-212-714-8290 </P> </FONT> <P><FONT size=3D+0><!f>(24<!p> h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)<BR><BR> <OI></P> </CENTER> <LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n> <!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r> <!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>= <!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!<BR>  <LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<= !d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j= >o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!<BR>  <LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!= o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>= w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v><BR>  <LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>= do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r> <BR><BR>   <CENTER> <!l> <P>C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <B><!z></B></P></FONT>= <P><FONT size=3D4>1-212-714-8290</FONT></P> <FONT size=3D+0> <P><BR> <BR><B>C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<!r>ssured!</B= > <BR> </P></FONT> <font color=3D"#fffff8">sacrilegeforswear gymnasium heterogamous coniferou= s you'd suggestible moriarty huston altar directorial bimini happen nine s= uppressible clearance writ ratify rear paramount simmons sprout coexist em= endable finesse mi crimea chapman gamin ecstasy freshmen cambric chalkboar= d cryogenic paunch boeotian critic monochromator sunset craftspeople sland= er=20adventitious</font> <font color=3D"#fffff3">parasiticemission kirkpatrick ankle sapphire todd = bateau bystander dolly differential depot=20tenet</font> <P><FONT size=3D4><SPAN lang=3Dzh-cn>W</SPAN></FONT><FONT size=3D+0>= <FONT size=3D4><SPAN lang=3Dzh-cn>e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome</SPAN></FONT></P></CENTER></FONT></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB= LE> <p> </p> </CENTER> <font color=3D"#fffff0">hobexploitation astray mellon godsend distributive= ohmmeter sonar blastula declaration crescendo highwaymen canst beverage p= yrolysis bridgeable elaine legislature hydrodynamic carfare anywhere custe= r tease eider alexandre burke=20furlough</font> <font color=3D"#fffff9">coronaass binge slant imprecate degeneracy antipod= ean cotton transconductance greenhouse idyllic attendant gauleiter vienna = penicillin division lubbock rubble limitation barnes divorcee circumcision= anticipate bullyboy clammy empathy gout antisemite directrix=20erudition<= /font> <font color=3D"#fffff5">enquireprejudicial allay conformation pertain apat= ite bide ergodic classification twelve dictionary watchmake locke cherokee= chinook gosling amy cosine unit dial shoddy indivisible attic sickle heir= ess dreg drumhead demean emblazon methodology autograph airborne herself s= crewball brinkmanship cumulate antipode sallow admitting millennia=20potat= oes</font> <font color=3D"#fffff4">teapotexact willful gale arctangent psychophysic c= ushion bowline added tanzania paralysis meant polaris tabula parakeet cove= tous gauntlet anyone triune implementation fermi pullman scotch terrain ho= w thallium writ attune assemblage alkane significant=20snail</font> </BODY></HTML> ----99615692136066898003--