From nobody Thu Feb 15 19:12:07 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0A126CD6 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:12:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nightwatchcybersecurity-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrklsDACV5Wo for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:12:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot0-x242.google.com (mail-ot0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FAD1243F3 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot0-x242.google.com with SMTP id e64so1649120ote.4 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:12:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nightwatchcybersecurity-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AsM+IXIYW28gHSqp2PEjbodUsW2bgLvFtomulhEsB98=; b=FKbEjXR1BCGb7OydsAGVATpRaZepCIOk//D/M5UKQNt1NJuiANirI+O8pJSMElCzuG KhK7WeO6X7CsSQ8ir3SuQI7pnbpEYgpXHDiPlOFqiyAC6NLDrjzICVR2yhWLo6XiKVB9 HfXm7ATK76xFhJmCj9PFYCONataJc1auM7Iroo0Wm/YFSxCr8uQAvHbQBSk2ZdPYOjKG lh49Q7cg65ThpnAFfi49XgCrVDpN7/f//G9xV3TziVos34TUVE3Z5dKL9y7jUArjrqXU LQry0epQr3dWsk8VQ9dZsUrlZ9Yofo8nChLEGJezICOWNkmcvOfUyHAR0y4tEMJOVy1o pg7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AsM+IXIYW28gHSqp2PEjbodUsW2bgLvFtomulhEsB98=; b=TUr1t55n+yJfJs92ScOj3uVMg1TWPgFEB52z1lDGBCAMb2eA23UWQXTJq/6HG1nWj8 8j153dyO1suZJAvcLZPt9pdq1jPVsd6xA88OalER8XpCsBOET4GI4w/BrYgvcCBYAwUr gJMzO15t+8/22fPWlQJabVI45lMPUEd59Eg3Fzxc1TgWpu4UumRMsRUFey3lRHsElb20 ry5xXjkCJO1LB+UFH7GgTjhQq0KQG6v9FFK/2t/x7Zytihi0SmYpOe2fDxixGWLHv/ZS HvFm67Qs2yoWKChaTuPKoxV1rYXeSvKj9SB8kKAi4vS2/npb3JONI3Ugn+haU+wJVLJO 8TQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPC9UhGPFd9PmIJEo0iXPnWmWNJtWS+YVLerquFmP4PB18MnRfqr y1bWtGbMBF5MtBsSA6uIvfc4HTK3hocdRJ0zuW8n+EOfvHY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225Z/t7OGh8t9GqzbHhxdGbRcAPZyUh5Zv9B2NhcsM1QOkCrgq+dkKVS0bvhd3rV6sr8TmhCGHHh8wU+jix2qW0= X-Received: by 10.157.27.145 with SMTP id z17mr3337192otd.285.1518750720253; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:12:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.23.5 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:11:19 -0800 (PST) From: Yakov Shafranovich Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:11:19 -0500 Message-ID: To: secdispatch@ietf.org Cc: Ed Overflow Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: [Secdispatch] Request for time at IETF 101 / London - security.txt X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:12:06 -0000 Ed Foudil and others within the security community are working on an Internet draft proposing a new standard for providing security contact information via a standard file, similar to robots.txt. The most current draft can be found here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-foudil-securitytxt-03 Additional resources here: https://securitytxt.org/ https://github.com/securitytxt/security-txt https://securitytext.org/ (alpha) Several Internet sites are already publishing this on their websites: https://www.google.com/.well-known/security.txt https://www.dropbox.com/.well-known/security.txt https://www.tumblr.com/.well-known/security.txt https://www.facebook.com/.well-known/security.txt https://www.openssl.org/.well-known/security.txt Nevil Brownlee (the Independent Submissions Editor) has indicated that this document is not a good candidate for the independent stream, so the question now is whether this can be something that fall under the security area. I would like to ask for some time at IETF 101 to discuss this draft during SECDISPATCH. Thank you in advance From nobody Tue Feb 20 13:36:32 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0D3124E15 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:36:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWXGaLZyFEvy for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B73120724 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:36:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82830066F for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:36:26 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id c1Ug-fQFOqh5 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:36:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F175B3004AA for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:36:25 -0500 (EST) From: Russ Housley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Message-Id: <38CEEA61-0190-4EE9-AD73-323630F453A0@vigilsec.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:36:27 -0500 To: IETF SecDispatch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: [Secdispatch] I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig in London X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:36:30 -0000 I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig during the = SecDispatch session in London. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/ I understand that presentations are expected to be about 10 minutes. I = plan to cover the problem that the draft is trying to solve, the = proposed solution, and the desired next step. Then should be plenty of = time in the 10 minutes for open mic, allowing folks in the room voice = agreement or offer other suggestions. Russ From nobody Tue Feb 20 13:53:46 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6038712DA3D for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TfKxWxobVbc for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817321205D3 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w77so18576294wrc.6 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=qmNFRdgcLzzt7vCSvyaPbdLbkCHwsfnHhcZb4rgp+1U=; b=ewJq9ZwIDvFOnSyTe50DytKq4SNneDKW/Ql3CCz9DslmfXtpa/EDycvy8A8lZnO+Kd 3qwK5EvwHGugL6J5jZBzBWu3kJTWNF7UQ5T+iTx+UMXsOswO6WfZEjOdBCcpS5q8YdT9 INUXu/e2k0RLWvipbv8RJ6y2coP0m6xB3qtQcA4JirELlQ+dDwKTFoyZmwQ2VdoDttg8 g1OeHqdUa2b8QSD8pPkSAmmA3ocSKFps0wqZEU5iz83eduoWFkfJ2p2t38MmkB/kKvwq F830UMIjFnZawydcPVsMefO4i9l9QEnUVEBp6ftrQVOquMYpQRaoaR26ggPbQeKWWmDC z+9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=qmNFRdgcLzzt7vCSvyaPbdLbkCHwsfnHhcZb4rgp+1U=; b=VfDnKB/D7pxYM+SxCYuvDVWO46TvBKGQrn+dm4OnVzVO9BuyYZHA5ig5pqQnlnf90P 4/xaIJkHSVZTlZE4hGapYR0f+WUKQXL04sSKbvOmBZWgU7zzTCwYJplYKf/U54j+4lNy EUNXGiPQeUkpTHz60ir19DX5W0RQZHEXHf1Sk2TBduN1DxpgLeGZEv79mc6XFwTroMNf sT2N9qFvf7xj5d2M7MMGSJyq74IRiYFSTxm2yfJo4kbpH64dPizdYd6UeCZhWRe/X0c9 T33FugnxXdBYLRYJenGLqPZR6QY2wJU1JzxfaPfmKy05kIQOERdd8Xpl6fRKfH6l87lJ D9NA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDPOuSxNMFg5XGqPj17BpH814eRJXCK33pvGbHkigTk/5nT0D1N T7PWJ5RYHr86vDBvwqQfP33iUgeq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2251PZ5AjH2aQeaub5K7w6dQhew7GcJm4O9RCfxU4dts6a5RqDH8Wq4a3xG2/gy/sJXt3C3cxg== X-Received: by 10.223.200.2 with SMTP id d2mr927276wrh.81.1519163612897; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e67sm33092642wmd.7.2018.02.20.13.53.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:53:32 -0800 (PST) From: Yoav Nir Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C055506A-C705-4226-8DA7-5248A647E050" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:53:30 +0200 To: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: [Secdispatch] Considerations for Short-Term Certificates X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:53:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_C055506A-C705-4226-8DA7-5248A647E050 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi. I=E2=80=99d like time to present our STAR draft [1]. In Singapore we = had a side meeting with some good feedback. We=E2=80=99ll revise this = document before London and we=E2=80=99ll be seeking a home for it. Thanks, Thomas, Yaron, and Yoav [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-saag-star-00 = = --Apple-Mail=_C055506A-C705-4226-8DA7-5248A647E050 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi.

I=E2=80= =99d like time to present our STAR draft [1].  In Singapore we had = a side meeting with some good feedback. We=E2=80=99ll revise this = document before London and we=E2=80=99ll be seeking a home for it.

Thanks,

Thomas, = Yaron, and Yoav

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-saag-star-00
= --Apple-Mail=_C055506A-C705-4226-8DA7-5248A647E050-- From nobody Tue Feb 20 14:59:36 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC212E03B for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:59:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnE1_vPnDN0U for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6678126DFF for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y137so12564179qka.4 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:59:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uuc33BYpKZ0tRkfA5tSOnIXQVCLr7HR3qaqPDbOeydw=; b=DBNao7OJ9HVfCPs9cx7OLrdFOBXwzZwMgSJm7XHSHfsOzcMdovYkcVj7VqbMctBpxp vypB7KynErzT0xQHkx7jv4pA4ckD2/jujcHVh9o5GKhhIhUA16/RjImLXtPyFkGxStpo ee6f2XFEBbhIG0+8ssa4I1+9laU3JUMicQA83TDu3ZCut9wuPdZEGjWVm4qihlnC7EMx eUDIIwCCxKEqiPwQnbRkBxCi4qzKhZQpBg/58TmoXOgvWueUg10geaJgQ46iOj7nrPft bWlCayWR89PRmV9o7Kuma/KW8PEfEN5BzaSRT27r6C0Uk2f5m5OGvDPxM6Ugs7cWB50t ubmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uuc33BYpKZ0tRkfA5tSOnIXQVCLr7HR3qaqPDbOeydw=; b=Wnme2j+Y4I5jlxSbg6sFUfRzvZuVQW8Kl4mTCHWyBX+OpQNfYCT2AAV8D/3M0Uj2FG ilJCsB9vxr+TWfxv3ZTyr+Pw7MF0p/YK2wF7r7s3nnN1KB0JuJWWdHYOK6ymgEEbX5xo HxKOE9oNx1N3+2g6QKggITqLv+170yeO08/5eZSEbevHrsFlJB4N5kkwU0VNreVxsXSi yl5nsX2jAPbcMMCkiYM/RmNma7Vs1SCG0wnE+Oh/Ll5Vpz2gfWXWAF6x7JKT+2zcvGG7 3nUqMuv34Ju/3i7rny9OpBzOXwEZnUYtK7J6h1yaNIEOKTb/WKhBpGWXwNpAE68mGQkC /55Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAgvg5TWUSkYfhwr9ck6E+2515R4ZQwmflH1L582YTKNYdO5fNC DiNgQlE7+xsA7i8Qx989L0j9wZZs7UhiGuPSUA8Esw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2257WNbTpnUWtHIQpe5azdCNc3Tp7vqIBOEN+N6s4OOejmKi+oHTZ6R+TSr8AgYwjmRshCea7l8L6HrFN+U/OUQ= X-Received: by 10.55.9.135 with SMTP id 129mr1948015qkj.221.1519167571733; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:59:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.37.176 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:58:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <38CEEA61-0190-4EE9-AD73-323630F453A0@vigilsec.com> References: <38CEEA61-0190-4EE9-AD73-323630F453A0@vigilsec.com> From: Eric Rescorla Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:58:51 -0800 Message-ID: To: Russ Housley Cc: IETF SecDispatch Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11487b8c77cc930565acc362" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig in London X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:59:35 -0000 --001a11487b8c77cc930565acc362 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig during the > SecDispatch session in London. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/ > > I understand that presentations are expected to be about 10 minutes. I > plan to cover the problem that the draft is trying to solve, the proposed > solution, and the desired next step. I think it would be helpful if you said what that is, as it sounds like you know. -Ekr > Then should be plenty of time in the 10 minutes for open mic, allowing > folks in the room voice agreement or offer other suggestions. > > Russ > > _______________________________________________ > Secdispatch mailing list > Secdispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch > --001a11487b8c77cc930565acc362 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com= > wrote:
I would like to=C2= =A0 present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig during the SecDispatch session i= n London.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/do= c/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/

I understand that presentations are expected to be about 10 minutes.=C2=A0 = I plan to cover the problem that the draft is trying to solve, the proposed= solution, and the desired next step.=C2=A0

I think it would be helpful if you said what that is, as it sounds like yo= u know.

-Ekr
=C2=A0
=C2=A0Then should be plenty of time in the 10 minutes for = open mic, allowing folks in the room voice agreement or offer other suggest= ions.

Russ

_______________________________________________
Secdispatch mailing list
Secdispatch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispa= tch

--001a11487b8c77cc930565acc362-- From nobody Wed Feb 21 06:27:47 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92E12D7F3 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:27:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WWWIn2qEqRPs for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F37912D7E6 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:27:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w1LERhbW029006 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:27:43 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu w1LERhbW029006 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1519223263; bh=VpeoEG9S1M5IPxlUHWXDjAgMxqESmwb5MIAltWk5I18=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=afvLC6ROsNnFgdaQr8lRzqTqzAwlQndSpImy3gaKxSu3sCMFJ/ulzp5w93QfEXlkT cOLccZtTSJAfjPMFy7H4lyWNe274JZWroGuIeifvhzR2F/wQFW1sKd13g2MfRNFZPU f5/ta+60MDmzTjvSTMGOIW+PG7bAEvEEgj1CIdNs= Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w1LERfCA026620 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:27:41 -0500 Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:27:41 -0500 From: Roman Danyliw To: "secdispatch@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 Thread-Index: AdOrFIrvd2svV2J5SKC8b7/txIBTZg== Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:27:40 +0000 Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC013753251B@marathon> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:27:47 -0000 Hello! SecDispatch has been tentatively scheduled at IETF 101 on Tuesday (March 20= ) at 0930-1200. If you would like time on the agenda, send your request to= the mailing list. Helpful items to include in your request (if known/appl= icable) are: ** pointers to a draft(s)/document ** pointers to related background or prior discussion ** desired next steps If needed, precedence will be given to documents that have demonstrated int= erest in the form of active drafts and list discussion. If you have questions, please reach out to the co-chairs. Regards, Roman and Richard From nobody Wed Feb 21 08:16:31 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD5912D86F for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:16:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uBe6acjDwCyU for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D2A127010 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FABF300A07 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:16:25 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EHGHOdXcJIAc for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4091E300441; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) From: Russ Housley Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_45F6C2E2-1C64-4F7B-9A42-D344170B2BA9" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:16:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: Cc: IETF SecDispatch To: Eric Rescorla References: <38CEEA61-0190-4EE9-AD73-323630F453A0@vigilsec.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig in London X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:16:29 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_45F6C2E2-1C64-4F7B-9A42-D344170B2BA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >=20 > I would like to present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig during the = SecDispatch session in London. >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/ = >=20 > I understand that presentations are expected to be about 10 minutes. = I plan to cover the problem that the draft is trying to solve, the = proposed solution, and the desired next step.=20 >=20 > I think it would be helpful if you said what that is, as it sounds = like you know. I am pushing hash-based signatures on software and firmware downloads = for two reasons. First, we need to deploy a quantum-safe signature long = before there is large-scale quantum computer, otherwise we will not be = able to deploy the next generation of cryptographic algorithms without = physically touching every device. Second, the signature validation code = in the bootloader is small and fast. Verification being small and fast = makes this attractive in the IoT environment. The relationship to CMS makes LAMPS a reasonable place to proceed with = this document. The relationship to IoT firmware makes SUIT a reasonable place to = proceed with this document. Russ= --Apple-Mail=_45F6C2E2-1C64-4F7B-9A42-D344170B2BA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

I = would like to  present draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig during the = SecDispatch session in London.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/

I understand that presentations are expected to be about 10 = minutes.  I plan to cover the problem that the draft is trying to = solve, the proposed solution, and the desired next = step. 

I think it would be helpful if you said what that is, as it = sounds like you know.

I am pushing hash-based signatures on = software and firmware downloads for two reasons.  First, we need to = deploy a quantum-safe signature long before there is large-scale quantum = computer, otherwise we will not be able to deploy the next generation of = cryptographic algorithms without physically touching every device. =  Second, the signature validation code in the bootloader is small = and fast.  Verification being small and fast makes this attractive = in the IoT environment.

The relationship to CMS makes LAMPS a reasonable place to = proceed with this document.

The relationship to IoT firmware makes SUIT a reasonable = place to proceed with this document.

Russ
= --Apple-Mail=_45F6C2E2-1C64-4F7B-9A42-D344170B2BA9-- From nobody Wed Feb 28 06:28:12 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710C4128959 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:28:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruF2hecRwOm8 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0092D12D77E for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.68] (unknown [186.138.211.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CC5280C47; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:28:04 +0100 (CET) To: secdispatch@ietf.org From: Fernando Gont Cc: Roman Danyliw , =?UTF-8?Q?Iv=c3=a1n_Arce_=28Quarkslab=29?= Message-ID: <0f2f887e-56c1-2e69-4762-65860c2cd303@si6networks.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:27:57 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:28:11 -0000 Hello, Roman, > Hello! > > SecDispatch has been tentatively scheduled at IETF 101 on Tuesday > (March 20) at 0930-1200. If you would like time on the agenda, send > your request to the mailing list. Helpful items to include in your > request (if known/applicable) are: > > ** pointers to a draft(s)/document ** pointers to related background > or prior discussion ** desired next steps > > If needed, precedence will be given to documents that have > demonstrated interest in the form of active drafts and list > discussion. I'd like to request time on the agenda. * Title: "Security and Privacy Implications of Numeric Identifiers Employed in Network Protocols" * Filename: draft-gont-predictable-numeric-ids-02 * Presenter: Fernando Gont * Desired next steps: + Decide whether to pursue as single document, or to split the document into separate smaller documents + Adopt as wg item * Background/previous discussion: This I-D was originally discussed on the SAAG list, and presented at the SAAG meeting in Buenos Aires (). It seemed that folks agreed that the I-D had valuable information. There also seemed to be agreement to split the document in smaller bits, roughly as follows: + Sample timeline of flawed IDs https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-history-03.txt + Advice on numeric ID generation https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation-02.txt + Update to RFC3552 https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-02.txt At the time, the update to RFC3552 was put on hold because of the rfc3552bis effort which was later aborted (). Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Wed Feb 28 08:03:12 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D1712EB2E for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:03:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOOTWi5noJlI for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF4312EB2D for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B242300590 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:03:04 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 0_kGOfSHg4-1 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:03:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.22.112.5] (unknown [65.132.39.155]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E75430041E; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:03:03 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Russ Housley In-Reply-To: <0f2f887e-56c1-2e69-4762-65860c2cd303@si6networks.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:03:05 -0500 Cc: IETF SecDispatch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8CD0FFB6-212A-444B-8FDF-70C2D5F3CA5D@vigilsec.com> References: <0f2f887e-56c1-2e69-4762-65860c2cd303@si6networks.com> To: Fernando Gont X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:03:10 -0000 Fernando: I do not think that SecDispatch will adopt any documents itself. = Instead, the idea is to suggest a way forward, and then have the people = in the room discuss that suggestion. Russ > On Feb 28, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Fernando Gont = wrote: >=20 > Hello, Roman, >=20 >> Hello! >>=20 >> SecDispatch has been tentatively scheduled at IETF 101 on Tuesday >> (March 20) at 0930-1200. If you would like time on the agenda, send >> your request to the mailing list. Helpful items to include in your >> request (if known/applicable) are: >>=20 >> ** pointers to a draft(s)/document ** pointers to related background >> or prior discussion ** desired next steps >>=20 >> If needed, precedence will be given to documents that have >> demonstrated interest in the form of active drafts and list >> discussion. >=20 > I'd like to request time on the agenda. >=20 > * Title: "Security and Privacy Implications of Numeric Identifiers > Employed in Network Protocols" >=20 > * Filename: draft-gont-predictable-numeric-ids-02 >=20 > * Presenter: Fernando Gont >=20 > * Desired next steps: > + Decide whether to pursue as single document, or to split the = document > into separate smaller documents > + Adopt as wg item >=20 > * Background/previous discussion: >=20 > This I-D was originally discussed on the SAAG list, and presented at = the > SAAG meeting in Buenos Aires > (). It > seemed that folks agreed that the I-D had valuable information. There > also seemed to be agreement to split the document in smaller bits, > roughly as follows: >=20 > + Sample timeline of flawed IDs >=20 > = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-history-03.txt= >=20 > + Advice on numeric ID generation >=20 > = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-generation-02.= txt >=20 > + Update to RFC3552 >=20 > = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerat= ions-02.txt >=20 >=20 > At the time, the update to RFC3552 was put on hold because of the > rfc3552bis effort which was later aborted > = ()= . >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Best regards, > --=20 > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Secdispatch mailing list > Secdispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch From nobody Wed Feb 28 08:45:22 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409E412DA0C for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:45:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1uBSSUJf5a6l for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DA3126C22 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.68] (unknown [186.138.211.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C022D80DAD; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:45:09 +0100 (CET) To: Russ Housley Cc: IETF SecDispatch References: <0f2f887e-56c1-2e69-4762-65860c2cd303@si6networks.com> <8CD0FFB6-212A-444B-8FDF-70C2D5F3CA5D@vigilsec.com> From: Fernando Gont Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:34:35 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8CD0FFB6-212A-444B-8FDF-70C2D5F3CA5D@vigilsec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:45:21 -0000 Hi, Russ, On 02/28/2018 01:03 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > Fernando: > > I do not think that SecDispatch will adopt any documents itself. Instead, the idea is to suggest a way forward, and then have the people in the room discuss that suggestion. Yes, my bad. Thanks! -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Wed Feb 28 09:16:24 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D8112D7F1 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:16:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0L143-1iGEP for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4852E1242F5 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w1SHGIV9028401; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:16:19 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu w1SHGIV9028401 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1519838179; bh=0t2wORiEus8dYaq7l2mDDsVKyszpS/Ql0ONaeskEfQI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b3cQM/Dd+41FtLVI28aiJEIqHzysRVZ+oZNpJ8sX/xr8clmATlYUjUCvskpeELBCm KIKQtXsDGzbsKBI+AGIc5X9SpkUDSjxyL7WD3IGMplW8DVdH4y4wOGy8ZeaxucFdOf JxWXLnISkpBnylQJKXqw6e/J91dBCl77wa5qKvDQ= Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w1SHGHiO008697; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:16:18 -0500 Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:16:17 -0500 From: Roman Danyliw To: Fernando Gont , Russ Housley CC: IETF SecDispatch Thread-Topic: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 Thread-Index: AQHTsKBf+LZtjlVbA0quG1oyA6tbRaO6TcyAgAAIzYD//6+QwA== Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:16:16 +0000 Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0137F6B4B0@marathon> References: <0f2f887e-56c1-2e69-4762-65860c2cd303@si6networks.com> <8CD0FFB6-212A-444B-8FDF-70C2D5F3CA5D@vigilsec.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF 101 X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Dispatch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:16:22 -0000 Hi Fernando and Russ! > -----Original Message----- > From: Secdispatch [mailto:secdispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Fernando Gont > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 11:35 AM > To: Russ Housley > Cc: IETF SecDispatch > Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Call for agenda items for SecDispatch at IETF = 101 >=20 > Hi, Russ, >=20 > On 02/28/2018 01:03 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > > Fernando: > > > > I do not think that SecDispatch will adopt any documents itself. Inste= ad, the > idea is to suggest a way forward, and then have the people in the room di= scuss > that suggestion. >=20 > Yes, my bad. To provide further color to Russ's comment, the SecDispatch draft chart [1]= outlines the outcomes for items brought to the WG. They are as follows: --[snip]-- - Directing the work to an existing WG. - Developing a proposal for a BOF. - Developing a charter for a new WG. - Making recommendations that documents be AD-sponsored (which ADs may or m= ay not choose to follow). - By agreement with SEC ADs, processing simple administrative documents. - Deferring the decision for the new work. - Rejecting the new work. --[end]-- Bottom line, the WG will not adopt any documents for itself. Regards, Roman [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/secdispatch/about/