Subject: Re: [sipcore] Input requested on how to proceed with the essential corrections to RFC 3261

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:26:35 +0300

Hi John,

> By the way, I noticed the absence of sip-sips from the list of drafts
> updating RFC 3261. Arguably that could also be considered an "essential
> correction", but I certainly think it should remain in its own document.

I did not include it on the list because it is already in the RFC 
Editor's queue:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-sip-sips/

Cheers,

Gonzalo