Subject: Re: [sipcore] Updates to 4244bis-05

From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:06:46 -0400

________________________________________
From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes [[email-masked]]

2) Updated section 9.3 (receiving responses) to also include timeouts and updated to reflect that we don't add the Reason header in the case of 2xx responses.
________________________________________

Can you tell me the design considerations for why Reason is not used in the case of 2xx responses?  (Is it for backward compatibility?)

Dale