Subject: Re: [sipcore] RFC 4028 bis instead of draft-ietf-sipcore-sessiontimer-race

From: "Roland Jesske" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 16:32:07 +0100

+1

--

Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit WEB.DE Mail gesendet.

Am 08.11.18, 13:06, Roman Shpount <[email-masked]> schrieb:

I support creating the RFC4028-bis draft.

Regards,

_____________
Roman Shpount

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:18 AM A. Jean Mahoney <[email-masked]> wrote:

Hi all,

During the sipcore WG session in Bangkok today, it was discussed that it

would probably be better to create a bis of RFC 4028 than to continue

with draft-ietf-sipcore-sessiontimer-race.

The scope of the bis draft would be limited to fixing bugs and

clarifying ambiguities that cause problems in the field.

Please respond by Nov 15 if you have any comments or concerns about

creating a RFC4028-bis draft.

Thanks,

Jean, as chair

_______________________________________________

sipcore mailing list

[email-masked]

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore