Subject: Re: [Speechsc] mrcpv2-01: Strength of OPTIONS processing (S 6)

From: Sarvi Shanmugham <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:43:41 -0800

This makes sense.

What you are proposing is similar to the case I mentioned on a separate 
thread about possible case of 3pcc where the client may do an INVITE 
without any SDP and have the server offer an m=control line for each 
resource it supports, in 200 OK. The client than picks the one it needs 
and answers in the ACK.

Could you please respond to my earlier with your opinion on this topic.

Thanks,
Sarvi

Eric Burger wrote:

>Does it make sense for the result of an OPTIONS to *not* have at least the m-line for the control channel?  Is there a situation where a server does *not* support at least one media type?  If not, my vote is the server MUST return the appropriate m-lines in response to the OPTIONS request.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speechsc mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc