Subject: Re: [Speechsc] mrcpv2-01: Content-Length

From: Sarvi Shanmugham <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:39:18 -0800

I agree. It was usefull in MRCPv1 but since we have added a length field 
in the header line,  the Content-Length may be redundant now.

Sarvi

Eric Burger wrote:

>One the one hand, the text says Content-Length MUST be present.  On the other hand, the text says if it is not present, it is OK.
>
>Which should it be?  Choose one.  Given the number of parameters, I could see rejecting a message without a Content-Length.  Otherwise, my vote is to drop the MUST.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speechsc mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc