Subject: Re: [tcpm] ATO i-d

From: Fernando Gont <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:41:05 -0300

At 12:39 17/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Based on the postings on the list it seems to Ted and I that the
>consensus is for this WG to take on the ATO internet-draft
>(draft-eggert-tcpm-tcp-abort-timeout-option-00.txt).

I think this statement does not make it clear we'll take on the issue of 
having TCP "negotiate" TCP User Timeouts, rather than on any specific proposal.

Best Regards,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [email-masked] || [email-masked]

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm