From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 10 07:31:08 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3743A6DA7; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:31:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E173A6D34 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.79 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.680, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Va4ytUfAG9qU for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B4D3A6F25 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jjxo9-0005ez-Fh for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:22 +0000 Received: from hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net ([217.184.142.23]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:21 +0000 Received: from nobody by hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:31:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: "Frank Ellermann" Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:33:56 +0200 Organization: Lines: 15 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Subject: [Tools-discuss] I-D.ietf-eai-dsn X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Ellermann List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Hi, shows a tracker link for , but the page doesn't. Trying to figure out what rfcmarkup does, this can't happen, in I see a "docidnum", "docphase" doesn't begin with "ID-Exists": Rfcmarkup 1.62 never run for this draft after the PubReq, the old HTML page was apparently created by version 1.58. Is the code calling rfcmarkup 1.62 also visible somewhere ? Frank _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 10 09:27:02 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9881328C1C8; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579F63A6D3A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:27:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.362 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkSvxH9lqmzw for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9EE3A6D4A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36982 helo=chardonnay.local) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jjzbw-00056R-WD; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: <47FE3FCC.3010103@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:26:52 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Ellermann References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D.ietf-eai-dsn X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Hi Frank, On 2008-04-10 16:33 Frank Ellermann said the following: > Hi, shows a tracker link for > , but the > page > doesn't. > > Trying to figure out what rfcmarkup does, this can't happen, > in I > see a "docidnum", "docphase" doesn't begin with "ID-Exists": > > Rfcmarkup 1.62 never run for this draft after the PubReq, > the old HTML page was apparently created by version 1.58. > > Is the code calling rfcmarkup 1.62 also visible somewhere ? What results in calling rfcmarkup is pretty convoluted; to put it simply (hmm), there's the 404 script which generates the html version if none exist, then there's a cron job which removes old conversions after some time, to make the features of new rfcmarkup versions gradually be applied, and finally there are scripts which remove html versions when something significant has happened, like publication of an RFC, which should be reflected also in the htmlized version of the draft. It's quite possible that I've simply missed setting up the removal of htmlized drafts at the point when they are sent to the IESG, and a [Tracker] link should appear -- I'll have to go and look. (Of course, the short answer to your question, which won't be nearly as helpful, is `rsync rsync.tools.ietf.org::`. ) Regards, Henrik _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 10 09:57:54 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F63F3A6A8D; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:57:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431463A6B5D for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:57:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0hKb4pmaoZt for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C6E3A6A8D for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk069-0005Td-8h for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:58:05 +0000 Received: from hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net ([217.184.142.23]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:58:05 +0000 Received: from nobody by hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:58:05 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: "Frank Ellermann" Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:00:36 +0200 Organization: Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <47FE3FCC.3010103@levkowetz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hmbg-d9b88e17.pool.mediaways.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D.ietf-eai-dsn X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Ellermann List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> Is the code calling rfcmarkup 1.62 also visible somewhere ? [okay, bad question, see below] > It's quite possible that I've simply missed setting up the > removal of htmlized drafts at the point when they are sent > to the IESG, and a [Tracker] link should appear -- I'll have > to go and look. It's not that simple, it worked for the two other EAI drafts. > Of course, the short answer to your question, which won't > be nearly as helpful, is `rsync rsync.tools.ietf.org::`. I forgot to mention "visible for V.90 users", rsync won't do, I don't want to start a fourth IETF tools server at home for modem fans... ;-) Frank _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Wed Apr 23 15:40:19 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26583A6C07; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5194A3A6C07 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPtRwuI-8LBv for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697D63A67A5 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-203.messagelabs.com!1208990414!7372682!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.141] Received: (qmail 29324 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2008 22:40:15 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.141) by server-10.tower-203.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Apr 2008 22:40:15 -0000 Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3NMeL5W006976 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:22 -0700 Received: from klph001.kcdc.att.com (klph001.kcdc.att.com [135.188.3.11]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3NMeH7Q006955 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:17 -0700 Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m3NMeHFM031836 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:40:17 -0500 Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m3NMeCCO031584 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:40:12 -0500 Received: from [135.210.32.184] (unknown[135.210.32.184](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20080423224011gw100l7o6qe> (Authid: tony); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:40:11 +0000 Message-ID: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:41:26 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Cc: Bill Fenner , Henrik Levkowetz , Glen Barney Subject: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt and all_id.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org There was some discussion recently of having an xml version of the internet-drafts files 1id-*.txt and all_id.txt. Moving this further along, I'd like to make concrete proposals for the schema for such files. First off, for 1id-abstract, the schema would be (I'm not an expert at DTDs, so forgive any errors here): Translation: contains and contains 1 or more contains a , , , , and The contains a working group acronym. At the end is a map from working group acronyms to spelled out names. contains 1 or more Each contains an and . A sample would look like this: Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE 802.16 Networks HongSeok Jeon 18-Apr-08 16ng draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-06.txt This document describes the transmission of IPv4 over ... ... 16ng IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks 6man IPv6 Maintenance ... A complete sample file can be seen at http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.xml For all_id.xml, I'm proposing this schema: Translation: contains one or more Each contains a , a , and a Depending on the value of , there may be a , a , a and a . A sample would look like this: draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03 2007-12-18 In IESG processing Revised ID Needed draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-03 2007-10-25 In IESG processing Publication Requested draft-zorn-radius-port-type-04 2006-04-04 RFC 4603 draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02 2008-03-03 Replaced draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh A complete sample file can be seen at http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/all_id.xml Thoughts? Tony Hansen tony@att.com _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Wed Apr 23 17:02:53 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6283A697E; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F3B3A697E for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id neiGtNbTcTyl for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EB23A67B6 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JoovK-0006WU-T2 for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:02:50 +0000 Received: from hmbg-d9b88e16.pool.mediaways.net ([217.184.142.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:02:50 +0000 Received: from nobody by hmbg-d9b88e16.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:02:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: "Frank Ellermann" Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:05:28 +0200 Organization: Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hmbg-d9b88e16.pool.mediaways.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Ellermann List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Tony Hansen wrote: > Maybe one or more , and an optional . Why is the optional ? > > > Matter of taste. I'd use an attribute 'wg' as IDREF with an attribute 'acronym' as ID, with that trick an undefined 'wg' triggers a validation error. You have no intended status element, is that as it should be ? > > 6man > IPv6 Maintenance > ITYM in this example. With my idea you would get IPv6 Maintenance here. === > In IESG processing > Revised ID Needed [...] > In IESG processing > Publication Requested I'm not sure about that. Why not use the terminology in ? "PubReq" is no substate of "IESG evaluation", it comes before "AD evaluation" and "Last Call", both before the "IESG evaluation". AFAIK "Revised ID needed" is a generic substate, it can happen outside of "IESG evaluation", e.g., in the "AD evaluation". Frank _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 24 10:06:54 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5922B3A6CBD; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:06:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495CD3A6CEA for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:06:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_82=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_92=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYXieudKBmnZ for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F2E3A6CBD for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m3OH6Xd1015952; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:06:36 +0300 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:06:32 +0300 Received: from vaebe104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.59]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:06:31 +0300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:06:30 +0300 Message-ID: <1696498986EFEC4D9153717DA325CB7271D47E@vaebe104.NOE.Nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt Thread-index: Acilkwk/gknOyys+Q7WtuXdMrWDNPwAmHsZg References: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2008 17:06:31.0870 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B2BC5E0:01C8A62D] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Cc: fenner@gmail.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, glen@amsl.com Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Here's a sample from the code I currently have: draft-ietf-xcon-framework Active 10 2007-11-09 13106 .txt A Framework for Centralized Conferencing mary.barnes@nortel.com Mary Barnes cboulton@avaya.com Chris Boulton oritl@microsoft.com Orit Levin This document defines the framework for Centralized Conferencing.
The framework allows participants using various call signaling
protocols, such as SIP, H.323, Jabber, Q.931 or ISUP, to exchange
media in a centralized unicast conference. The Centralized
Conferencing Framework defines logical entities and naming
conventions. The framework also outlines a set of conferencing
protocols, which are complementary to the call signaling protocols,
for building advanced conferencing applications. The framework binds
all the defined components together for the benefit of builders of
conferencing systems. xcon IESG Evaluation Revised ID Needed 2007-11-09 Cullen Jennings Proposed Standard Some explanation: "docValidity" is one of: Active, Expired, RFC, Withdrawn by submitter, Withdrawn by IETF, and Replaced. All Internet-Drafts are in one of these states. The describes what IESG is doing with the document. A document could also have similar blocks for and . Best regards, Pasi > -----Original Message----- > From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Tony Hansen > Sent: 24 April, 2008 01:41 > To: tools-discuss@ietf.org > Cc: Bill Fenner; Henrik Levkowetz; Glen Barney > Subject: [Tools-discuss] xml version of > 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt > > There was some discussion recently of having an xml version of the > internet-drafts files 1id-*.txt and all_id.txt. > > Moving this further along, I'd like to make concrete > proposals for the > schema for such files. First off, for 1id-abstract, the > schema would be > (I'm not an expert at DTDs, so forgive any errors here): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: > contains and > contains 1 or more > contains a , , , , > and > The contains a working group acronym. > At the end is a map from working group acronyms to spelled > out names. > contains 1 or more > Each contains an and . > > A sample would look like this: > > > > > > Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE > 802.16 Networks > HongSeok Jeon > 18-Apr-08 > 16ng > draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-06.txt > > This document describes the transmission of IPv4 over ... > > ... > > > > 16ng > IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks > > > 6man > IPv6 Maintenance > > ... > > > > A complete sample file can be seen at > > http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.xml > > For all_id.xml, I'm proposing this schema: > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: > contains one or more > Each contains a , a , and a > Depending on the value of , there may be a , a > , a and a . > > A sample would look like this: > > > > draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03 > 2007-12-18 > In IESG processing > Revised ID Needed > > > draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-03 > 2007-10-25 > In IESG processing > Publication Requested > > > draft-zorn-radius-port-type-04 > 2006-04-04 > RFC > 4603 > > draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02 > 2008-03-03 > Replaced > draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh > > > > A complete sample file can be seen at > http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/all_id.xml > > Thoughts? > > Tony Hansen > tony@att.com > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 24 10:33:15 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880513A6B3E; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167E03A6B3E for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.849 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUa5F0qGcvOT for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9FB3A6971 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2008 10:33:19 -0700 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3OHXJVh015497; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:19 -0700 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3OHXJNl014824; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:33:19 GMT Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:19 -0700 Received: from [10.32.244.219] ([10.32.244.219]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> References: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Message-Id: From: Fred Baker Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:20 -0700 To: Tony Hansen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2008 17:33:18.0846 (UTC) FILETIME=[4900D9E0:01C8A631] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=5473; t=1209058399; x=1209922399; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Tools-discuss]=20xml=20version=20of=20 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt=20and=20all_id.txt |Sender:=20; bh=F8Bz4EonQG8Iom50C4Fx9fOrlxcH7sVTwRBfEfbaEvE=; b=JIiBjndYMdYq3K7S6bl8BRpfH8+R7J+0vZCJzFEiGdq6QHh1/8PDEcMWDj C3NQhUe1XDKrZpKw6DXO+7eNouuwxDZxljsp735zImzD4Lrps4Q7vR4GY5S7 UXPq5z1chRedBUz6EgrKHOmfeulkrOwIBN33f7qW/mg8/t1Bq+bjY=; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Cc: Bill Fenner , Henrik Levkowetz , tools-discuss@ietf.org, Glen Barney Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt and all_id.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org quite a few of our documents are not submitted to working groups. Did you intend to have "ietf" as a potential working group? How did you want to handle that? Personally, I would like to find individual submissions to working groups as well as working group documents here, perhaps with an attribute distinguishing them. The way we do this now is that working group documents are named draft-ietf--... while individual submissions to working groups are named draft---... Submissions that are not to a working group are draft--... and don't name a WG. But the secretariat only keeps track of the one category. That's mostly a database question, but it raises the question of an attribute that indicates working group status. In a tool/page that used this, I would appreciate having a mailto link that got me to the authors, as in authors, similar links that got me to the relevant working group chairs and ADs, and a link that got me to the ID tracker, as in ID Status I don't think that has to be in the XML description of the doc, but is certainly derivable from the data and would be useful. On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Tony Hansen wrote: > There was some discussion recently of having an xml version of the > internet-drafts files 1id-*.txt and all_id.txt. > > Moving this further along, I'd like to make concrete proposals for the > schema for such files. First off, for 1id-abstract, the schema > would be > (I'm not an expert at DTDs, so forgive any errors here): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: > contains and > contains 1 or more > contains a , , , , and > > The contains a working group acronym. > At the end is a map from working group acronyms to spelled out > names. > contains 1 or more > Each contains an and . > > A sample would look like this: > > > > > > Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE > 802.16 Networks > HongSeok Jeon > 18-Apr-08 > 16ng > draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-06.txt > > This document describes the transmission of IPv4 over ... > > ... > > > > 16ng > IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks > > > 6man > IPv6 Maintenance > > ... > > > > A complete sample file can be seen at > http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/1id- > abstracts.xml > > For all_id.xml, I'm proposing this schema: > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: > contains one or more > Each contains a , a , and a > Depending on the value of , there may be a , a > , a and a . > > A sample would look like this: > > > > draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03 > 2007-12-18 > In IESG processing > Revised ID Needed > > > draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-03 > 2007-10-25 > In IESG processing > Publication Requested > > > draft-zorn-radius-port-type-04 > 2006-04-04 > RFC > 4603 > > draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02 > 2008-03-03 > Replaced > draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh > > > > A complete sample file can be seen at > http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/all_id.xml > > Thoughts? > > Tony Hansen > tony@att.com > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 24 11:24:16 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D12E28C1A9; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45ED3A6C3A for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_82=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_92=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5wT9j9VM1hpp for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CE53A6BF2 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42319 helo=chardonnay-2.local) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jp675-0005LN-Ps; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:24:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4810D046.10603@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:24:06 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tony@att.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <480FBB16.9020603@att.com> <1696498986EFEC4D9153717DA325CB7271D47E@vaebe104.NOE.Nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <1696498986EFEC4D9153717DA325CB7271D47E@vaebe104.NOE.Nokia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tony@att.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com, fenner@gmail.com, glen@amsl.com, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: fenner@gmail.com, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com, glen@amsl.com Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] xml version of 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org And below is the format which is currently used in the state.xml files available for all current and most old drafts at tools.ietf.org/draft//state.xml. I think a revision of this format which uses Pasi's schema for the tag would be good. Note the tag which is more complex than the other proposals -- this is in order to be able to handle the fact that there may be multiple simultaneous states for various phases of the document processing, such as the IESG, IANA, and RFC-Editor queue states. There's also additional state information of a type which both in the IESG case and in the RFC-editor case can exist in multiple instances (so it's not really state information) -- I've called this , and there can be multiple infotags within a element. draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option IESG RFC-queue RFC-Editor Auth48 Dependency This document defines new DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options that contain a\nlist of IP addresses to locate one or more of PANA Authentication\nAgents (PAA). This is one of the methods that a PANA Client (PaC) can\nuse to locate PANA Authentication Agents (PAA). Jari Arkko Lionel Morand <lionel.morand@orange-ft.com> Alper Yegin <alper01.yegin@partner.samsung.com> Suraj Kumar <surajk@techmahindra.com> Syam Madanapalli <syam@samsung.com> 16022 Standards Track 13742 9 draft-ietf-pana-pana[in-queue] 05 Dynamic Host Configuration 2006-12-18 DHCP options for PANA Authentication Agents Active dhc On 2008-04-24 19:06 Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com said the following: > Here's a sample from the code I currently have: > > > draft-ietf-xcon-framework > > Active > 10 > 2007-11-09 > 13106 > .txt > A Framework for Centralized Conferencing > > mary.barnes@nortel.com > Mary Barnes > > > cboulton@avaya.com > Chris Boulton > > > oritl@microsoft.com > Orit Levin > > > This document defines the framework for Centralized Conferencing.
> The framework allows participants using various call signaling
> protocols, such as SIP, H.323, Jabber, Q.931 or ISUP, to exchange
> media in a centralized unicast conference. The Centralized
> Conferencing Framework defines logical entities and naming
> conventions. The framework also outlines a set of conferencing
> protocols, which are complementary to the call signaling protocols,
> for building advanced conferencing applications. The framework binds
> all the defined components together for the benefit of builders of
> conferencing systems. > xcon > > > IESG Evaluation > Revised ID Needed > 2007-11-09 > Cullen Jennings > Proposed Standard > > > > Some explanation: > > "docValidity" is one of: Active, Expired, RFC, Withdrawn by submitter, > Withdrawn by IETF, and Replaced. All Internet-Drafts are in one of > these states. > > The describes what IESG is doing > with the document. A document could also have similar blocks > for and . > > Best regards, > Pasi > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Tony Hansen >> Sent: 24 April, 2008 01:41 >> To: tools-discuss@ietf.org >> Cc: Bill Fenner; Henrik Levkowetz; Glen Barney >> Subject: [Tools-discuss] xml version of >> 1id-abstracts.txt/1id-index.txt andall_id.txt >> >> There was some discussion recently of having an xml version of the >> internet-drafts files 1id-*.txt and all_id.txt. >> >> Moving this further along, I'd like to make concrete >> proposals for the >> schema for such files. First off, for 1id-abstract, the >> schema would be >> (I'm not an expert at DTDs, so forgive any errors here): >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Translation: >> contains and >> contains 1 or more >> contains a , , , , >> and >> The contains a working group acronym. >> At the end is a map from working group acronyms to spelled >> out names. >> contains 1 or more >> Each contains an and . >> >> A sample would look like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE >> 802.16 Networks >> HongSeok Jeon >> 18-Apr-08 >> 16ng >> draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802.16-06.txt >> >> This document describes the transmission of IPv4 over ... >> >> ... >> >> >> >> 16ng >> IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks >> >> >> 6man >> IPv6 Maintenance >> >> ... >> >> >> >> A complete sample file can be seen at >> >> http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.xml >> >> For all_id.xml, I'm proposing this schema: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Translation: >> contains one or more >> Each contains a , a , and a >> Depending on the value of , there may be a , a >> , a and a . >> >> A sample would look like this: >> >> >> >> draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03 >> 2007-12-18 >> In IESG processing >> Revised ID Needed >> >> >> draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-03 >> 2007-10-25 >> In IESG processing >> Publication Requested >> >> >> draft-zorn-radius-port-type-04 >> 2006-04-04 >> RFC >> 4603 >> >> draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02 >> 2008-03-03 >> Replaced >> draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh >> >> >> >> A complete sample file can be seen at >> http://merlot.tools.ietf.org/~tonyh/internet-drafts/all_id.xml >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Tony Hansen >> tony@att.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Wed Apr 30 09:33:52 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-tools-discuss-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537FD3A6B8E; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E91D3A6767 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:44:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaEP-KEMS7wZ for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jc-bell.com (mail.jc-bell.com [204.13.148.210]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054AD28C15D for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.2.2]) by mail.jc-bell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D39478CD2 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:44:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nw-ds.com Received: from jcb (adsl-99-135-148-173.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [99.135.148.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.jc-bell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570CE78CC2 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:44:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jim Bell" To: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0500 Organization: J. C. Bell & Associates, Inc. Message-ID: <00d601c8aa39$b9b5db20$2d219160$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AciqObk3ZtBJxDD9Q/C1bZp4Pj1YtA== Content-Language: en-us X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:33:50 -0700 Subject: [Tools-discuss] Text in RFC 3986 breaks RFC-HTML tool X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0303971185==" Sender: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============0303971185== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D7_01C8AA0F.D0DFD320" Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D7_01C8AA0F.D0DFD320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To Whom It May Concern: The RFC-HTML tool mangles RFC 3986 a little. Appendix C in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt has this paragraph: Yes, Jim, I found it under "http://www.w3.org/Addressing/", but you can probably pick it up from . Note the warning in . That gets mangled in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 Regards, -Jim Bell P.S.: The RFC-HTML tool overall is outstanding, and I appreciate it very much. ------=_NextPart_000_00D7_01C8AA0F.D0DFD320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To Whom It May = Concern:

The RFC-HTML tool = mangles RFC 3986 a little.

 

Appendix C in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3= 986.txt has this paragraph:

Yes, Jim, I found it under = "http://www.w3.org/Addressing/",

      but you can probably pick it up from = <ftp://foo.example.

      com/rfc/>.  Note the warning in = <http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/

      ietf/uri/historical.html#WARNING>.

 

That gets mangled = in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rf= c3986

 

Regards,

-Jim = Bell

 

P.S.: The RFC-HTML = tool overall is outstanding, and I appreciate it very = much.

 

------=_NextPart_000_00D7_01C8AA0F.D0DFD320-- --===============0303971185== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss --===============0303971185==--