
From hadi@mojatatu.com  Sat May 30 11:20:20 2009
Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0973A706E for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.745, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sEv708hILDTv for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192953A7014 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so4920744ana.4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 11:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.11.1 with SMTP id 1mr5303913ank.104.1243707720115; Sat, 30  May 2009 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:21:40 -0400
Message-ID: <af98005c0905301121h2071f916s8fb21d9e9b925a23@mail.gmail.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:20:24 -0700
Subject: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:20:20 -0000

Hi there,

I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue perhaps;
if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your guidance on who to
talk to.
My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in many
references; for example:
http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-02.xml
shows:
<author initials="J" surname="Salim" fullname="Jamal Hadi  Salim">

In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
<author fullname="Jamal Hadi Salim" initials="J." surname="Hadi Salim">

As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which
picks only one name in my surname.

This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.

cheers,
jamal

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun  1 13:05:47 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8506E3A7141 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JM2NXRq8KOjx for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398AE3A6C61 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B2D5638703; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 22:05:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AFB386F0; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 22:05:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-232-110-214-no16.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.110.214]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4698037E4D; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 22:05:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34000 helo=chardonnay.local) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MBDlN-0002DD-0C; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:05:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:05:39 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
References: <af98005c0905301121h2071f916s8fb21d9e9b925a23@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <af98005c0905301121h2071f916s8fb21d9e9b925a23@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hadi@mojatatu.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:05:47 -0000

Hi Jamal,

On 2009-05-30 20:21 Jamal Hadi Salim said the following:
> Hi there,
> 
> I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue perhaps;
> if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your guidance on who to
> talk to.
> My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in many
> references; for example:
> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-02.xml
> shows:
> <author initials="J" surname="Salim" fullname="Jamal Hadi  Salim">
> 
> In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
> <author fullname="Jamal Hadi Salim" initials="J." surname="Hadi Salim">
> 
> As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which
> picks only one name in my surname.
> 
> This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.

The source of the trouble seems to be that although your name is entered
correctly in the IETF database (I checked) the bibxml files are created by
processing the author information after it has been exported in text format.

This is unfortunate, and I don't know if the creator and maintainers of
xml2rfc has a solution to this -- they may well have that, I just don't
know.

I'm cc:ing Marshall Rose who will know.

Regards,

	Henrik

From adam@nostrum.com  Mon Jun  1 13:21:52 2009
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEE13A6A19 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WR-LuYPsald for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5BB3A6C8B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.231] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n51KLbYe070668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:21:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:21:36 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Message-ID: <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
Thread-Index: Acni9o/Z0lruYFk/Z0qaEWknaklsIg==
In-Reply-To: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:21:53 -0000

The xml2rfc tool seems to aggressively trim names on certain kinds of
boundaries, and discard information that the author clearly intended to be
part of his name. For example, whenever I get a new copy of xml2rfc, I
comment out the following lines:

        if {[string compare $av(initials) ""]} {
            set av(initials) [lindex [split $av(initials) .] 0].
        }

This allows me to generate documents with my preferred designation of "A.B.
Roach," instead of having to fix them up in AUTH48. (FWIW, I don't care for
the interaction between having a first initial that is an article and a last
name that is a noun without the ability to insert an intervening letter).

It would be kind of nice if the tool stopped thinking that it knows how to
represent our names better than we do.

/a


On 6/1/09 3:05 PM, "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:

> Hi Jamal,
> 
> On 2009-05-30 20:21 Jamal Hadi Salim said the following:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue perhaps;
>> if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your guidance on who to
>> talk to.
>> My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in many
>> references; for example:
>> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-forces-sc
>> tptml-02.xml
>> shows:
>> <author initials="J" surname="Salim" fullname="Jamal Hadi  Salim">
>> 
>> In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
>> <author fullname="Jamal Hadi Salim" initials="J." surname="Hadi Salim">
>> 
>> As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which
>> picks only one name in my surname.
>> 
>> This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.
> 
> The source of the trouble seems to be that although your name is entered
> correctly in the IETF database (I checked) the bibxml files are created by
> processing the author information after it has been exported in text format.
> 
> This is unfortunate, and I don't know if the creator and maintainers of
> xml2rfc has a solution to this -- they may well have that, I just don't
> know.
> 
> I'm cc:ing Marshall Rose who will know.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Henrik
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss



From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Mon Jun  1 13:25:27 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129493A68CF for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pmTrf+zwt8l6 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com (mail-bw0-f222.google.com [209.85.218.222]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBA83A6813 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so7715819bwz.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=drENkJcFvFLqjaKWDWnbv3IQuuL30K/Aw1DZfH2pXQw=; b=fBt/FscWZ5fR/cbKEBkbkn2W8vqnQK4VHz6Qc3vc5gudX8rmJfWL6XafctlHdaGxPg 3UTf+1gVxO25SmsetlH/D1soaqkp9bCUElCWJFSmCyoPiCapsR55xTFgSAYknbtJzOsJ ozO4Mrng6CdTdiQ17jvgoDfX4LjESYHQPV7Jk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Oq3t/2LhYg8rpbCOyZF9a6KijFvBA/aJYvoZYa+m7HIFMYtqhvvqYrpuvsn1EqT7Io Q5Ufyt7TMsAyH+5mmiPou2SL0wgCbbVxAr7qBclDRV3mbEGgp81tip7ozlSGs4kq5z0P 0ARTZTjGSuOVI11Yo8qtjTLe0UvrP/MJMmVVA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.57.67 with SMTP id b3mr6080101bkh.99.1243887922469; Mon,  01 Jun 2009 13:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:25:22 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906011325t543f5143r46d40f0870683394@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:25:27 -0000

> (FWIW, I don't care for
> the interaction between having a first initial that is an article and a l=
ast
> name that is a noun without the ability to insert an intervening letter).

Having trouble parsing this sentence.  Are you looking to allow names
like "The X Files"?
--Richard



>
> It would be kind of nice if the tool stopped thinking that it knows how t=
o
> represent our names better than we do.
>
> /a
>
>
> On 6/1/09 3:05 PM, "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jamal,
>>
>> On 2009-05-30 20:21 Jamal Hadi Salim said the following:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue perha=
ps;
>>> if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your guidance on =
who to
>>> talk to.
>>> My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in many
>>> references; for example:
>>> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-for=
ces-sc
>>> tptml-02.xml
>>> shows:
>>> <author initials=3D"J" surname=3D"Salim" fullname=3D"Jamal Hadi =A0Sali=
m">
>>>
>>> In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
>>> <author fullname=3D"Jamal Hadi Salim" initials=3D"J." surname=3D"Hadi S=
alim">
>>>
>>> As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which
>>> picks only one name in my surname.
>>>
>>> This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.
>>
>> The source of the trouble seems to be that although your name is entered
>> correctly in the IETF database (I checked) the bibxml files are created =
by
>> processing the author information after it has been exported in text for=
mat.
>>
>> This is unfortunate, and I don't know if the creator and maintainers of
>> xml2rfc has a solution to this -- they may well have that, I just don't
>> know.
>>
>> I'm cc:ing Marshall Rose who will know.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Henrik
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>

From versteb@cisco.com  Mon Jun  1 13:29:33 2009
Return-Path: <versteb@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1493A6774 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-G8KZRtcv2b for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EB3A6A6B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,286,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="166138718"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2009 20:28:38 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n51KScAw015284;  Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:28:38 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n51KSRDk026694; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:28:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.116]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);  Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:28:33 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:28:33 -0400
Message-ID: <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
Thread-Index: Acni9o/Z0lruYFk/Z0qaEWknaklsIgAAHaIQ
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>
From: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" <versteb@cisco.com>
To: "Adam Roach" <adam@nostrum.com>, "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>, "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2009 20:28:33.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[88DA57E0:01C9E2F7]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3145; t=1243888118; x=1244752118; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=versteb@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Bill=20Ver=20Steeg=20(versteb)=22=20<versteb@ci sco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Tools-discuss]=20bibliographical=20ref erences |Sender:=20; bh=a9H7rbUt7QPLgwglOdd6FUDlzpDPDxZLTCfsLfhyM1k=; b=r9X0ko9o7NOGCwMixidB9Nb8OmitXEQddAhoJgNDQJSMRVHxkVhJg+uVqw 1ad/mVdLwcwvyIlBJEGixr+JDwW+IqwCeaFfIZMnYqIfG5Cu2j9OcVWwuAfA j3bgxipc5zoW52vGg5lhYxhWt4bWo8nn1UeKam3EtGgP0ev8V/gcE=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=versteb@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); 
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:29:33 -0000

This does seem to be aggressive. Ver Steeg becomes Steeg. Van Caenegem
becomes Caenegem.

Any way to make the "official" version of the tools know about 2-part
last names?

Bill Ver Steeg=20

-----Original Message-----
From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:22 PM
To: Henrik Levkowetz; Jamal Hadi Salim
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org; Marshall Rose
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references

The xml2rfc tool seems to aggressively trim names on certain kinds of
boundaries, and discard information that the author clearly intended to
be part of his name. For example, whenever I get a new copy of xml2rfc,
I comment out the following lines:

        if {[string compare $av(initials) ""]} {
            set av(initials) [lindex [split $av(initials) .] 0].
        }

This allows me to generate documents with my preferred designation of
"A.B.
Roach," instead of having to fix them up in AUTH48. (FWIW, I don't care
for the interaction between having a first initial that is an article
and a last name that is a noun without the ability to insert an
intervening letter).

It would be kind of nice if the tool stopped thinking that it knows how
to represent our names better than we do.

/a


On 6/1/09 3:05 PM, "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:

> Hi Jamal,
>=20
> On 2009-05-30 20:21 Jamal Hadi Salim said the following:
>> Hi there,
>>=20
>> I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue=20
>> perhaps; if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your=20
>> guidance on who to talk to.
>> My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in=20
>> many references; for example:
>> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-f
>> orces-sc
>> tptml-02.xml
>> shows:
>> <author initials=3D"J" surname=3D"Salim" fullname=3D"Jamal Hadi  =
Salim">
>>=20
>> In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
>> <author fullname=3D"Jamal Hadi Salim" initials=3D"J." surname=3D"Hadi =

>> Salim">
>>=20
>> As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which

>> picks only one name in my surname.
>>=20
>> This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.
>=20
> The source of the trouble seems to be that although your name is=20
> entered correctly in the IETF database (I checked) the bibxml files=20
> are created by processing the author information after it has been
exported in text format.
>=20
> This is unfortunate, and I don't know if the creator and maintainers=20
> of xml2rfc has a solution to this -- they may well have that, I just=20
> don't know.
>=20
> I'm cc:ing Marshall Rose who will know.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Henrik
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss


_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

From julian.reschke@gmx.de  Mon Jun  1 13:34:17 2009
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145723A6B06 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.498
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.899, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ge+eDXEUyQr for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E51C73A6905 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jun 2009 20:34:14 -0000
Received: from p508FC3FC.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.195.252] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 01 Jun 2009 22:34:14 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XswoaXXhXn/8jV2k0RWVJZSybsLRv+zMKgdAm1M A5ss3Qmw3nXaXd
Message-ID: <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:34:05 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" <versteb@cisco.com>
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com> <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.71
Cc: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:34:17 -0000

Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote:
 > This does seem to be aggressive. Ver Steeg becomes Steeg. Van Caenegem
 > becomes Caenegem.
 >
 > Any way to make the "official" version of the tools know about 2-part
 > last names?
 >
 > Bill Ver Steeg

How about trying to make the tools chain extract the metadata from the 
XML version, when present?

BR, Julian

From mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us  Mon Jun  1 13:47:52 2009
Return-Path: <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C94E3A6CA7 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owUrrhELvXug for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yard.public.resource.org (xml.resource.org [192.101.98.232]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607E53A6BB2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 13:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yard.public.resource.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id n51KloV9028152; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:47:50 -0700
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com>
References: <af98005c0905301121h2071f916s8fb21d9e9b925a23@mail.gmail.com> <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com>
Message-Id: <FF24BAC7-CBD6-4012-9249-9B752A865C15@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:47:50 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:47:52 -0000

for the i-d repository, we are given a text file to produce the  
references file. there is no structured information.

if the i-d repository can produce it's only references files, that  
would be the preferred solution...

/mtr

On Jun 1, 2009, at 13:05 , Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

> Hi Jamal,
>
> On 2009-05-30 20:21 Jamal Hadi Salim said the following:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am not sure who to talk to - but this looked like a tools issue  
>> perhaps;
>> if you are the wrong email address i would appreciate your guidance  
>> on who to
>> talk to.
>> My name is consistently being mispelt over the last many years in  
>> many
>> references; for example:
>> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-ietf-forces-sctptml-02.xml
>> shows:
>> <author initials="J" surname="Salim" fullname="Jamal Hadi  Salim">
>>
>> In the draft xml submission - this was entered as:
>> <author fullname="Jamal Hadi Salim" initials="J." surname="Hadi  
>> Salim">
>>
>> As you can see some tool which creates the references has a bug which
>> picks only one name in my surname.
>>
>> This issue currently exists in at least 3 IETF drafts.
>
> The source of the trouble seems to be that although your name is  
> entered
> correctly in the IETF database (I checked) the bibxml files are  
> created by
> processing the author information after it has been exported in text  
> format.
>
> This is unfortunate, and I don't know if the creator and maintainers  
> of
> xml2rfc has a solution to this -- they may well have that, I just  
> don't
> know.
>
> I'm cc:ing Marshall Rose who will know.
>
> Regards,
>
> 	Henrik


From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun  1 14:30:16 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5443A68AF for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kh2ChCPe87pO for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.184]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD103A68CF for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 887B1383B1; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av8-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F5138078; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-232-110-214-no16.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.110.214]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C2037E4B; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:30:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56753 helo=chardonnay.local) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MBF5A-0000Cp-QW; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:30:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4A244861.1040005@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:30:09 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>	<81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com> <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: julian.reschke@gmx.de, versteb@cisco.com, mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us, tools-discuss@ietf.org, hadi@mojatatu.com, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:30:16 -0000

On 2009-06-01 22:34 Julian Reschke said the following:
> Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote:
>  > This does seem to be aggressive. Ver Steeg becomes Steeg. Van Caenegem
>  > becomes Caenegem.
>  >
>  > Any way to make the "official" version of the tools know about 2-part
>  > last names?
>  >
>  > Bill Ver Steeg
> 
> How about trying to make the tools chain extract the metadata from the 
> XML version, when present?

I thought that the bibxml draft author information was derived from one of
the textual exports of the IETF database author information, and if so then
Jamal's case won't be helped at all -- the information is already correct
in the database, but the export format looses the distinction between
given, middle, and family name, so the bibxml generation software will
have to guess.

Setting up an xml export format would be rather trivial; if anybody would
like to pitch in, then please show up at the code sprint in Stockholm
(see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF75Sprint) and we
should be able to make this happen.


Best,

	Henrik

From versteb@cisco.com  Mon Jun  1 14:33:19 2009
Return-Path: <versteb@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3BC3A68CF for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.299
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IosxDAlDtQWw for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6830A3A68C4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,286,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="36609458"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2009 21:33:18 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n51LXIK2006410;  Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:33:18 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n51LXH8m004528; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:33:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.116]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);  Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:33:00 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:33:00 -0400
Message-ID: <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF604@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A244861.1040005@levkowetz.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
Thread-Index: AcnjACtaH2aWya8cR9SLd3TyC57IJgAACf1A
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>	<81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com> <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de> <4A244861.1040005@levkowetz.com>
From: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" <versteb@cisco.com>
To: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2009 21:33:00.0788 (UTC) FILETIME=[89C84B40:01C9E300]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1585; t=1243891998; x=1244755998; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=versteb@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Bill=20Ver=20Steeg=20(versteb)=22=20<versteb@ci sco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Tools-discuss]=20bibliographical=20ref erences |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Henrik=20Levkowetz=22=20<henrik@levkowetz.com>,=0 A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=22Julian=20Reschke=22=20<julian.re schke@gmx.de>; bh=mDZXxIsvLsHITJ5vDOco9SYm4dWge//Xl0ke/9Y6CPA=; b=MucbPztp/FVMslHY5XBSNQEJWqYxtYiU3O6vVp7heihY+Dbo9zjKpiKzTS Te6UWhXbGGHXUb7Lc+xD8K+pbTDsIQ3yBoNDL8NGFYrNY8UVb2dyE0/6BUPn k36l6Mc67v;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=versteb@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; ); 
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:33:19 -0000

Seeing as how I have been taking from the tools and not putting, I will
try to make it to the Stockholm code sprint. Hopefully the travel gods
line up properly.

Bill VerSteeg=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:henrik@levkowetz.com]=20
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:30 PM
To: Julian Reschke
Cc: Bill Ver Steeg (versteb); Marshall Rose; tools-discuss@ietf.org;
Jamal Hadi Salim
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references



On 2009-06-01 22:34 Julian Reschke said the following:
> Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote:
>  > This does seem to be aggressive. Ver Steeg becomes Steeg. Van=20
> Caenegem  > becomes Caenegem.
>  >
>  > Any way to make the "official" version of the tools know about=20
> 2-part  > last names?
>  >
>  > Bill Ver Steeg
>=20
> How about trying to make the tools chain extract the metadata from the

> XML version, when present?

I thought that the bibxml draft author information was derived from one
of the textual exports of the IETF database author information, and if
so then Jamal's case won't be helped at all -- the information is
already correct in the database, but the export format looses the
distinction between given, middle, and family name, so the bibxml
generation software will have to guess.

Setting up an xml export format would be rather trivial; if anybody
would like to pitch in, then please show up at the code sprint in
Stockholm (see
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF75Sprint) and we should
be able to make this happen.


Best,

	Henrik

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun  1 14:41:19 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7094F3A6B14 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1BBxHHGX4Bx for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B6F3A6A4F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 14:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id A253937FC0; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:41:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4949737E7B; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:41:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-232-110-214-no16.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.110.214]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F19137E43; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 23:41:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47195 helo=chardonnay.local) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MBFFq-0004ID-Ec; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:41:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4A244AF9.20101@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:41:13 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" <versteb@cisco.com>
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>	<81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com> <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de> <4A244861.1040005@levkowetz.com> <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF604@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF604@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: versteb@cisco.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us, tools-discuss@ietf.org, hadi@mojatatu.com, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:41:19 -0000

On 2009-06-01 23:33 Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) said the following:
> Seeing as how I have been taking from the tools and not putting, I will
> try to make it to the Stockholm code sprint. Hopefully the travel gods
> line up properly.

Splendid!

Best,

	Henrik

> Bill VerSteeg 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:henrik@levkowetz.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:30 PM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: Bill Ver Steeg (versteb); Marshall Rose; tools-discuss@ietf.org;
> Jamal Hadi Salim
> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
> 
> 
> 
> On 2009-06-01 22:34 Julian Reschke said the following:
>> Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote:
>>  > This does seem to be aggressive. Ver Steeg becomes Steeg. Van 
>> Caenegem  > becomes Caenegem.
>>  >
>>  > Any way to make the "official" version of the tools know about 
>> 2-part  > last names?
>>  >
>>  > Bill Ver Steeg
>>
>> How about trying to make the tools chain extract the metadata from the
> 
>> XML version, when present?
> 
> I thought that the bibxml draft author information was derived from one
> of the textual exports of the IETF database author information, and if
> so then Jamal's case won't be helped at all -- the information is
> already correct in the database, but the export format looses the
> distinction between given, middle, and family name, so the bibxml
> generation software will have to guess.
> 
> Setting up an xml export format would be rather trivial; if anybody
> would like to pitch in, then please show up at the code sprint in
> Stockholm (see
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF75Sprint) and we should
> be able to make this happen.
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> 	Henrik
> 

From hadi@mojatatu.com  Mon Jun  1 16:15:48 2009
Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F323A6905 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 16:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdBbExC-3esk for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 16:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131813A6B80 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 16:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so5811253ana.4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr7951423ane.90.1243898146160; Mon,  01 Jun 2009 16:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A244AF9.20101@levkowetz.com>
References: <4A243493.6090908@levkowetz.com> <C649A280.E517%adam@nostrum.com>  <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF255@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com> <4A243B3D.3000908@gmx.de> <4A244861.1040005@levkowetz.com>  <81B9B88E2F9D574AA5328A85547CDE91014FF604@xmb-rtp-21d.amer.cisco.com>  <4A244AF9.20101@levkowetz.com>
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:15:26 -0400
Message-ID: <af98005c0906011615v7901a85ft9d6acdecb096b596@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] bibliographical references
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:15:48 -0000

Much thanks everybody. I dont have much time myself, but i will drop by if
i show up at the meeting.

cheers,
jamal

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wro=
te:
>
> On 2009-06-01 23:33 Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) said the following:
>> Seeing as how I have been taking from the tools and not putting, I will
>> try to make it to the Stockholm code sprint. Hopefully the travel gods
>> line up properly.
>
> Splendid!
>
> Best,
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Henrik
>

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Tue Jun  2 07:44:11 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071083A6B19 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 07:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRsu25gN99lX for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 07:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com (mail-fx0-f216.google.com [209.85.220.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D681A3A6AF2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 07:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so6562213fxm.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tNwxNDh1Jw+Kl+o/7QVz5M3TrZvNacaXDcc8bvBwW70=; b=Zn5dLib1+RiBVH61o/oXDuh5PlHfNNvCn+HgIq3e4SyH2DGXkclK5fZoBRyws0g93l QRfI3ZjjL5bCqWBrxNAcPPpfkeY26YNGUZTv2C8M5oQ1qRkmDNLMxzl28+dHbQrLlL+D 70ARtZLJ5UQTLK2C5Bu7pRNzMI4nd6QfYQq1g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=BFkUPipHuV0+NY3xwsoAqP1K3gBK8C4z93VyoaHKztGltwYhAEq1E695uLJyTp/CUX jQqqH7O34IxOye6I5ivALibOkNbbRpmadrpSBEKCgRWTWJVyTdOLQtI021gFJD5IemPv 2C3Tjgn3QlSJQ9duHWXhaPp5vLS56HwClB74k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.124.7 with SMTP id s7mr6879766bkr.189.1243953846057; Tue,  02 Jun 2009 07:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:44:05 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906020744x7a87bbbfxbf3819bf8892efb4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Add milestone in trac
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:44:11 -0000

Hey all,

I'm trying to set up trac to track (haha) issues for a geopriv work
item, but I don't see anything in the web interface to allow me to add
a milestone to which these issues can be attached.

Is there a way to do this that I'm missing, or does someone need to do
this for me?

Thanks,
--Richard

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Tue Jun  2 08:16:00 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D76F3A6A87 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.666
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFzhbJPrluV7 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av7-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av7-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6F23A6C96 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by av7-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8FE9537E8C; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:33:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av7-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D980938098; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:33:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-232-110-214-no16.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.110.214]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D3937E43; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:15:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54059 helo=chardonnay.local) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MBViW-0004Sq-Au; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:15:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4A25422B.1040709@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:15:55 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <88ac5c710906020744x7a87bbbfxbf3819bf8892efb4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906020744x7a87bbbfxbf3819bf8892efb4@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: richard.barnes@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Add milestone in trac
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:16:00 -0000

Hi Richard,

On 2009-06-02 16:44 Richard Barnes said the following:
> Hey all,
> 
> I'm trying to set up trac to track (haha) issues for a geopriv work
> item, but I don't see anything in the web interface to allow me to add
> a milestone to which these issues can be attached.
> 
> Is there a way to do this that I'm missing, or does someone need to do
> this for me?

If you log in as rbarnes@bbn.com you'll see an additional main menu item
to the right of 'Search' which says 'Admin'.  There you'll get the option
to add, change and delete milestones, and a lot of other stuff.


Best,

	Henrik

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Tue Jun  2 08:20:37 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23D63A682D for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.949
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxddqS06xXwv for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com (mail-bw0-f222.google.com [209.85.218.222]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EA53A6F63 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so8233466bwz.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5j01luyo8ZJF98UyWGPCFQ6wAjBlcbJJwzksZ/hWPJ8=; b=RWgyej1nDZnxsqTiChPJpQWE1yNBYI3oo2+o1Sl6KEQyReYWidvaien1kYxI90ptCl M0cxpLSZ/7XY1Enanx2IddMLtzjEICvDVwb9JOEIZwglMt6nDoSuMVCayAohQNVn90hB 6v2iJzB76SfAtyKcYGPyBs7tO5ahSqUqpJLfo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f9VpE/Mkpbt/FMpUar0S5W05r0udWs/awzRB4n2SjZEu+0uycDgVVLQc/8dQHcK0BV QjFo6Plm/NGdfq2ndjEDhgJFb7d2ZM63KEA/YAJ8a8ujDgRsh/Lk6ZDpYsTcJ35PgmYN 3N2BmvmYKzYu0tlDPcIAVOgWC/0kY8EsHh8j0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.69.133 with SMTP id z5mr6960783bki.163.1243956035321; Tue,  02 Jun 2009 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A25422B.1040709@levkowetz.com>
References: <88ac5c710906020744x7a87bbbfxbf3819bf8892efb4@mail.gmail.com> <4A25422B.1040709@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:20:35 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906020820g42e0f5c8vf0d4e9f2e6ff3474@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Add milestone in trac
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:20:37 -0000

Aha, thanks, I had been using my gmail address to log in.
--Richard

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wr=
ote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 2009-06-02 16:44 Richard Barnes said the following:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up trac to track (haha) issues for a geopriv work
>> item, but I don't see anything in the web interface to allow me to add
>> a milestone to which these issues can be attached.
>>
>> Is there a way to do this that I'm missing, or does someone need to do
>> this for me?
>
> If you log in as rbarnes@bbn.com you'll see an additional main menu item
> to the right of 'Search' which says 'Admin'. =A0There you'll get the opti=
on
> to add, change and delete milestones, and a lot of other stuff.
>
>
> Best,
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Henrik
>

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Tue Jun  2 13:33:48 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683BA3A704B for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.832
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1z7sCCXvBK-k for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com (mail-fx0-f216.google.com [209.85.220.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297963A7035 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so6841805fxm.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OyHWEe1wfaC1a6TnCWUXPeyn0lVb4RZD1EEoxGPCruU=; b=h9DwXcO3B94DKPVi96CkUUQMeG7bK7n1rIwTWAolN+IZfo9Kg+/KNFlTXOsOkwtV2E QTcVH1xu/4LrpP95xQiTGWCDaolqOxAT1UQbwaN5kjVda09q1lLslfLDW3tYoJces5ij FglcGa5ijYmAazBSEwRlA5ixNaeP0UCGUL/lg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=JuuoSO00H+l8V0qUlHdsj8kpSOla3gIV0eBrAt3fyyi0R866sUwHDGsPBg+b7WEt4j Q99WOIMFZwNrLhuCGp8r5k2t+pQTKkwGIo/9fq2XHSkYKVNKUgX84pPUyBonRfKacxWW T56VgBOymhiPHrVm8ff+jYrmPxPuh/bkscd6Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.57.138 with SMTP id c10mr135233bkh.56.1243974821106; Tue,  02 Jun 2009 13:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:33:48 -0000

Hey all,

In response to a thread on another list where Henrik challenged me to
write a tool that pulls IETF lists over to RSS, here's a first cut:
<http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>

It's a perl script that does the following:
1. Read messages from a POP3 mailbox (set to use Gmail, but can use others)
2. Find any recipients foo@ietf.org or foo@tools.ietf.org
3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
   (creating the feed if necessary)

The feeds it creates work in Safari and Google Reader, but not in
Thunderbird for some reason.  A bug to fix.  I ran it on an IETF sink
account I've got, and posted sample feeds in this directory:
<http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/>

I'm not sure what the best way to integrate this will the tools
infrastructure is.  E.g., one could set up an account for it,
auto-subscribe it to IETF lists, and run the script it as a cron job.

Is anyone interested in this?  I'm by no means an expert in either
email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.

--Richard

From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org  Tue Jun  2 13:48:31 2009
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03828C19E for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2t2qOaE6geE for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5786328C18D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (sn87.proper.com [75.101.18.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n52KmQni044543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:48:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240836c64b40788b83@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:48:25 -0700
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:48:31 -0000

At 4:33 PM -0400 6/2/09, Richard Barnes wrote:
>Is anyone interested in this?  I'm by no means an expert in either
>email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.

Count me as interested and willing to help devlop.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Tue Jun  2 15:21:47 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5DC3A6AAA for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 15:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.716
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.716 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sp5kDq83O+MJ for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 15:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE423A6AA3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 15:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B8C6037FBC; Wed,  3 Jun 2009 00:21:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDF337F4B; Wed,  3 Jun 2009 00:21:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (81-232-110-214-no16.tbcn.telia.com [81.232.110.214]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1E037E4B; Wed,  3 Jun 2009 00:21:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56069 helo=chardonnay.local) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MBcMa-0005zi-ER; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:21:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4A25A5F6.1030809@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:21:42 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: richard.barnes@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, fluffy@cisco.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:21:47 -0000

On 2009-06-02 22:33 Richard Barnes said the following:
> Hey all,
>=20
> In response to a thread on another list where Henrik challenged me to
> write a tool that pulls IETF lists over to RSS, here's a first cut:
> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>
>=20
> It's a perl script that does the following:
> 1. Read messages from a POP3 mailbox (set to use Gmail, but can use oth=
ers)
> 2. Find any recipients foo@ietf.org or foo@tools.ietf.org
> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>    (creating the feed if necessary)
>=20
> The feeds it creates work in Safari and Google Reader, but not in
> Thunderbird for some reason.  A bug to fix.  I ran it on an IETF sink
> account I've got, and posted sample feeds in this directory:
> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/>
>=20
> I'm not sure what the best way to integrate this will the tools
> infrastructure is.  E.g., one could set up an account for it,
> auto-subscribe it to IETF lists, and run the script it as a cron job.
>=20
> Is anyone interested in this?  I'm by no means an expert in either
> email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.

Comments from others would be very good, but for the particular part
of the problem which relates to integration with tools, what I'd like
would really be to have a standalone script to which I could pipe one
message, and it could be set to either grab the feed name from the To:
header or from a command-line option, and would update the right feed
with the email content.

Being able to process one mail at a time from stdin (i.e., from a pipe)
is the most crucial part for easy integration.


Best,

	Henrik


From sm@resistor.net  Tue Jun  2 16:31:39 2009
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264D3A6A12 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9H-r6OfFWwyS for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB043A68E0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4.Alpha0/8.14.4.Alpha0) with ESMTP id n52NVOWu024160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1243985493; x=1244071893; bh=s2NW/zR86pKxQNKbyfBoKf6/VjQw0I0gDsOgXmfMGVk=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=XwZKjYcu6p7K3Txw2BtFvtDK3FSUrJdBtpPcFIuwMfn0ql1C5ASM+ik3XdONVY7iZ flOURX5ahjq5F4EuZdvpPpxiko6ONxSznGKxFSsAMkPrntpjsf8HvPagXDONFsoz8z pT8G7RuaJcbosSFDhY/IqVKfZtslidSQezI1BSFM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=Af69fJnR9Fg6uprncIj4QG6FN8z1vjG2zzeYUNBzqMrjBXHiZtkHY0DMQvuWw44Av fHbIdnvUuBb/TV/cEVWzIALVhTKZ8+i5ATXjotQM50ueE7K9ToI2GWyVuoAUtnhGBby FrnYoywfeQbIfAVqLfqSJcueR/erLZJrFjwr5Oo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090602162400.03399e40@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:31:12 -0700
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.co m>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:31:39 -0000

At 13:33 02-06-2009, Richard Barnes wrote:
>Is anyone interested in this?  I'm by no means an expert in either
>email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.

Take a look at draft-dusseault-httpmail-00

Regards,
-sm 


From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org  Tue Jun  2 16:35:54 2009
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92DA3A6C39 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KyTBgL2M8Md1 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D583A69D3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] ([64.168.229.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n52NYbsv054994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:34:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624084ac64b676d777a@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <4A25A5F6.1030809@levkowetz.com>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <4A25A5F6.1030809@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:34:36 -0700
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:35:54 -0000

At 12:21 AM +0200 6/3/09, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>Comments from others would be very good, but for the particular part
>of the problem which relates to integration with tools, what I'd like
>would really be to have a standalone script to which I could pipe one
>message, and it could be set to either grab the feed name from the To:
>header or from a command-line option, and would update the right feed
>with the email content.
>
>Being able to process one mail at a time from stdin (i.e., from a pipe)
>is the most crucial part for easy integration.

This should not be a problem. We'll work on this in the coming weeks.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Tue Jun  2 17:20:23 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E093A6CA3 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.774
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELKky9QROlbZ for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com (mail-fx0-f216.google.com [209.85.220.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9A3A69D1 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so7013803fxm.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZYahBucjiOmgpsbQGu0RK7klzNZ/wv6x/KD24C6GOb8=; b=QnVHp370ebGnE5qQv8QJv4XxA0+ANxN7UXI3ID7sd3SgCQomH0+hvIyDn3O6mCxGJD /Xf6heQ/5qv2wzDeI/MRXxN5CzlE0EcpC5YHgVAZiqXkOf/gKl9r2Qjfz67+lFUk2a3G aC7TZ7z3S/Aqg5Xu0vBGR565IDg8SqYMgv3QM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HgrxLlFyrh2mNQX0YErI9r2WtowSGcIoOI30bUihH/CWDc4zCIqu8MareVE8QI+wY7 vftTvkxQvUELU4kJfAcdhf9l7QxGs/djVHgHysf1sBiFO6DkPgUpC89OenlswPW+s8f7 PtHj+2js/30VT3Ksz6mXZSpQA9dCJDeP2Ug5w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.68.73 with SMTP id u9mr270891bki.192.1243988419348; Tue,  02 Jun 2009 17:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20090602162400.03399e40@resistor.net>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20090602162400.03399e40@resistor.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:20:19 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906021720y355449e9qfdcd228563537233@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:20:23 -0000

The goal of this effort is a little different than what Lisa's draft
is getting at.  The point of translating mail lists to RSS is to avoid
complicated filtering schemes: Since all RSS readers that I know of
are capable of separating out sources, if you make each list a source,
you avoid having to sort them yourself.

--Richard



On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:31 PM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:
> At 13:33 02-06-2009, Richard Barnes wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone interested in this? =A0I'm by no means an expert in either
>> email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.
>
> Take a look at draft-dusseault-httpmail-00
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Tue Jun  2 17:21:20 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3373A6CA3 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.739
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QD5Q-DXxOYZ0 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com (mail-fx0-f216.google.com [209.85.220.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C1A3A69D1 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2009 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so7014301fxm.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zu2UJgjivIXuRT7ipG0E1W7NOpWR1usN6bmDdWR9fdg=; b=e3e2LAItFpyRf2dTVIqtvdKw0eWGcy4cy4ao/xXvyyaDCzykZOtGQUpyZIfsrmYGrq CRj0+cL0dwCV1hwLOKMutlirCbNdMwsGXm9hUcnuojFuGJhRbDpS4BRS4+5Lw150WAqe i7SYwnv5EJnMYyl9qVM7/mPZoF+Mj36jgZ1og=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F2HJQdWUXIWhE+lBNQ+8Y1A3dxxcMy8mSbubYs/tOZ++95ehAYSSXjIYO6hZPlZlyK O9dxSzQLjho4R76auz2Un4a2Ql6lCHvoSx6fQUChlM/xhQRR57zXL1BnRdBKanW/Y3Kg Ta4/HfT/ZnoqekB5FTd0pTnDEsD8E4uxSO27Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.123.136 with SMTP id p8mr314347bkr.21.1243988477679; Tue,  02 Jun 2009 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <p0624084ac64b676d777a@10.20.30.158>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <4A25A5F6.1030809@levkowetz.com> <p0624084ac64b676d777a@10.20.30.158>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:21:17 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906021721r2836c545he4683b3440fa775f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:21:20 -0000

Seconded.  That actually simplifies the script quite a bit (don't have
to do POP or iterate through messages).

--Richard



On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> At 12:21 AM +0200 6/3/09, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>Comments from others would be very good, but for the particular part
>>of the problem which relates to integration with tools, what I'd like
>>would really be to have a standalone script to which I could pipe one
>>message, and it could be set to either grab the feed name from the To:
>>header or from a command-line option, and would update the right feed
>>with the email content.
>>
>>Being able to process one mail at a time from stdin (i.e., from a pipe)
>>is the most crucial part for easy integration.
>
> This should not be a problem. We'll work on this in the coming weeks.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
>

From bortzmeyer@nic.fr  Fri Jun  5 07:08:00 2009
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C303A6D6A for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sh-O989bmwJN for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9045C3A6997 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 360A41C0135; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 16:03:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A481C0132; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 16:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65D27B0043; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 16:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:02:59 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:08:00 -0000

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:33:41PM -0400,
 Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 29 lines which said:

> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>

Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@geopriv.dreamhosters.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to
use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>    (creating the feed if necessary)

Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
format, RFC 4287? Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
add RFC 4685 support as well.

From tony@att.com  Fri Jun  5 07:18:05 2009
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B146A3A6B29 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.953
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.646, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxX+0M8T+U20 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail146.messagelabs.com (mail146.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997233A67F8 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-146.messagelabs.com!1244211441!3229728!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.54]
Received: (qmail 19663 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 14:17:21 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.54) by server-13.tower-146.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Jun 2009 14:17:21 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n55EI4xc032395 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:18:04 -0400
Received: from alph001.aldc.att.com (alph001.aldc.att.com [135.53.7.26]) by mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n55EHwfI032295 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:17:58 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alph001.aldc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n55EHwBq018495 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:17:58 -0400
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alph001.aldc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n55EHpJH017807 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:17:51 -0400
Received: from [135.70.145.146] (vpn-135-70-145-146.vpn.mwst.att.com[135.70.145.146](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20090605141751gw1000u6hbe> (Authid: tony); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:17:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4A29290E.7050707@att.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:17:50 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:18:05 -0000

I was going to take a peek at the script as well and got the same error
message.

One of the reasons I was going to look was to see if it was generating
Atom and, if not, how easy it would be to convert to generating Atom.

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:33:41PM -0400,
>  Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com> wrote 
>  a message of 29 lines which said:
> 
>> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>
> 
> Internal Server Error
> 
> The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
> 
> Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@geopriv.dreamhosters.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
> 
> More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
> 
> Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to
> use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
> 
>> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>>    (creating the feed if necessary)
> 
> Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
> format, RFC 4287? Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
> threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
> add RFC 4685 support as well.
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 07:25:36 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95143A6BB9 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.716
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.716 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ka5hlsQMOFtR for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF83A6B67 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1532574bwz.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b6hwFHVjgFXmqFpqZtjT+Xkr/+YcIMXj1Z8u2yUwsrg=; b=tDZ6cFfbRvLocJURT4GXkgPSRXHUrsJjBH6rHGqfPzf+rjgfRTdpyHaAKZeFolXwDg p2eKlb3q0B/jOCScbvl99XB/gNk6Jnp4IIWMxKpr7unjvNdMYOzQGNwjqbKYG1EfemmW HzFCdiKyGfe7wQJDBGwPwHxABLYZepruP2nNs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m4khyP9xhAGNA9py2J93V5CV20ggyStrPXblSmPPYhAlxz+dqYxOWbbcWeQjIescWP CFjsZZEZIJBekLzMEnzuK16NmGwT92IK+Fyo0rAWVsvrXj7Kg7GW78KT86VGpd3vZRWs wxB7lMmPqxM3n+vSyxBZoagC/fc+WXepEqSbM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.77.78 with SMTP id f14mr3258224bkk.76.1244211934515; Fri,  05 Jun 2009 07:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A29290E.7050707@att.com>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr> <4A29290E.7050707@att.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:25:34 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906050725i61f2cb34h3d2a77eda75e639b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:25:36 -0000

Sorry, forgot that apache would try to run the scripts.  You can find
an updated version (conforming to Henrik's request that it take one
message at a time from STDIN) at this URI:
<http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/mail2rss.tar.gz>

Also, you can see a bunch of sample feeds if you look at the directory
one level up:
<http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/>

I've set up a little SVN repository for this stuff.  Let me know if
you want to contribute and I can send you a link and credentials.

--Richard



On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Tony Hansen<tony@att.com> wrote:
> I was going to take a peek at the script as well and got the same error
> message.
>
> One of the reasons I was going to look was to see if it was generating
> Atom and, if not, how easy it would be to convert to generating Atom.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Tony Hansen
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tony@att.com
>
> Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:33:41PM -0400,
>> =A0Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com> wrote
>> =A0a message of 29 lines which said:
>>
>>> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>
>>
>> Internal Server Error
>>
>> The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was una=
ble to complete your request.
>>
>> Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@geopriv.dreamhosters.=
com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might =
have done that may have caused the error.
>>
>> More information about this error may be available in the server error l=
og.
>>
>> Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to
>> use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
>>
>>> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>>> =A0 =A0(creating the feed if necessary)
>>
>> Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
>> format, RFC 4287? Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
>> threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
>> add RFC 4685 support as well.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 07:33:03 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7EB3A6B67 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgTYTnlBpyxy for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D03A6A8B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 07:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1537875bwz.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c4+2u0LIzh76JuaES0SM8d6mIIMX9VzDR31fTzspvoI=; b=gYHLXIZQ3zzfoXvHfWnkPSbvPHpCgT4V1w2QhkYteXX9SS6yKH06kkXH3MykakP1Tt CR1DNSKh8npdXmYe+Z534rR3sTdjgn4n6fx+n1EUPeiI+U0MKw84gcbpwWT6ULiDkMGX OzpYmkQxFZP68XzeRViV2ZdbDGf7omcbZUrb4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=koxT+wOGRQY/bTIB2h60xIqL52/5Jrx7wfR1fSY05hRjDMDFVVf9I6bRrv4oV1JoaS uk/ZNyhBrNqpRTC29Mj3K27GWibo93FGCTC/l/msll36fOeEEH5KDhu3F6kkBGRx/VJX 45hsEKFQ6zIoHkIoQYge/cZMTBYRaHIyg2GAE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.114.140 with SMTP id e12mr3260280bkq.68.1244212382591;  Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:33:00 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906050733u4c320698t6333cad7d19e3381@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:33:03 -0000

>> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>> =A0 =A0(creating the feed if necessary)
>
> Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
> format, RFC 4287?

The short answer is that XML::RSS was the first Perl module I found.
I'll look around and see if there's a similarly easy way to do Atom.

> Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
> threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
> add RFC 4685 support as well.

That could be more subtle (right now, we don't look at the existing
contents of the feed, we just append), but I'll also check to see how
hard it would be to implement, e.g., whether there's a library to use.

--Richard

From fluffy@cisco.com  Fri Jun  5 08:02:10 2009
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E943A6C28 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 08:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HRgvJpMKAJX4 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 08:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A4A3A6B64 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 08:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,312,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="173050015"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2009 15:02:08 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n55F27Tt018762;  Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:02:07 -0700
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n55F27Dq001696; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:02:07 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D49423B6-3B28-4157-BE3E-E17EEFF800CA@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:02:06 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1425; t=1244214128; x=1245078128; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Email=20to=20RSS |Sender:=20; bh=xwvrz0aL5EcEpsAudeiMvvysK8YBwpQ87KgASQKE7Qs=; b=Z/lAWZKx18HaD2WXw/M7i+gVMdLQ0CNXst/5jCl+OfMvlNs0Ol1OyH00Y4 Sn5yo3ZgJ8huxxstQTL27lBMuGZ1rZvVqSZxcsKF2wmT6tNgJfEa8IPsy3x5 W77YQqPAGG;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); 
Cc: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:02:10 -0000

Cool.

I have a gmail account that has been subscribed to most of the IETF  
lists for a few years if you want to use it for testing. It's not used  
for anything else - I just use it so I can you gmail to search  
archives of lists.



On Jun 2, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> In response to a thread on another list where Henrik challenged me to
> write a tool that pulls IETF lists over to RSS, here's a first cut:
> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/gmail2rss.pl>
>
> It's a perl script that does the following:
> 1. Read messages from a POP3 mailbox (set to use Gmail, but can use  
> others)
> 2. Find any recipients foo@ietf.org or foo@tools.ietf.org
> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>   (creating the feed if necessary)
>
> The feeds it creates work in Safari and Google Reader, but not in
> Thunderbird for some reason.  A bug to fix.  I ran it on an IETF sink
> account I've got, and posted sample feeds in this directory:
> <http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/feeds/>
>
> I'm not sure what the best way to integrate this will the tools
> infrastructure is.  E.g., one could set up an account for it,
> auto-subscribe it to IETF lists, and run the script it as a cron job.
>
> Is anyone interested in this?  I'm by no means an expert in either
> email or RSS or the tools system, so help would be appreciated.
>
> --Richard


From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org  Fri Jun  5 09:12:01 2009
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE1C3A6DDB for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,  BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2E85XP82ttEi for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF363A6DC3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (dsl-63-249-108-169.static.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n55GBXWc039745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:11:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624084dc64ef3f47846@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:11:32 -0700
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:12:01 -0000

At 4:02 PM +0200 6/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>>    (creating the feed if necessary)
>
>Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
>format, RFC 4287? Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
>threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
>add RFC 4685 support as well.

I will make sure it is Atom.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

From richard.barnes@gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 09:49:09 2009
Return-Path: <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159513A6A62 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.687
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9RpDJrFBy7kH for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EB53A6E26 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 09:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so706162fxm.37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xsyyOoOD3VyPQSwWcKLLvLnDnSjXKOpLM8rq3NU3T3E=; b=DQppXfcvRtgkd2hKXQUj9MMoEoRGAgnxYCx0yBm4GKVXefyRfnn4sHGOCtpJr+h9Qr 5pzsMI9v+OVIkRRYVuku69xoZYsHLGRymtuN6yRocUIiHZZOMEdxCnsCPT8IVuwroypK 5nC3Wga4LqK5yMrH/YAO0HOnhMaVNr5TXHLSw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UAFdagRnfssueOe3dI+iQwihsOatOeRRMrGntw/dvsiv60KniZt2F+BV6wA4aX4ujZ Ji7fRrZKRQLg7dhXBj7dV3pae62A+/Jug0JesC4J48Zquclsd/n4kTbyS3zickDmSdbR sTb+KGOyxmREtZp1Af8j/Vk/eCZn0AvSTGxok=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.52.146 with SMTP id i18mr3343003bkg.33.1244220530788; Fri,  05 Jun 2009 09:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710906050733u4c320698t6333cad7d19e3381@mail.gmail.com>
References: <88ac5c710906021333p2735f481gf74348ed2df04d25@mail.gmail.com> <20090605140259.GA31793@nic.fr> <88ac5c710906050733u4c320698t6333cad7d19e3381@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:48:49 -0400
Message-ID: <88ac5c710906050948q7c3f2096k40086c7c94032d0f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Email to RSS
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:49:09 -0000

Ok, Atom now supported, including an initial stab at RFC 4658.  SVN
directory for the whole thing is here:
<http://geopriv.dreamhosters.com/svn2/mail2rss/>

--Richard



On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Richard Barnes<richard.barnes@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>>> 3. Writes the message as a new item to feeds/${foo}.rss
>>> =A0 =A0(creating the feed if necessary)
>>
>> Why using the underspecified RSS (which one, by the way?) and not IETF
>> format, RFC 4287?
>
> The short answer is that XML::RSS was the first Perl module I found.
> I'll look around and see if there's a similarly easy way to do Atom.
>
>> Besides, reading IETF mailing lists without
>> threading would be quite painful, so I suggest to the brave coders to
>> add RFC 4685 support as well.
>
> That could be more subtle (right now, we don't look at the existing
> contents of the feed, we just append), but I'll also check to see how
> hard it would be to implement, e.g., whether there's a library to use.
>
> --Richard
>

From munjo.yu@gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 11:10:43 2009
Return-Path: <munjo.yu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0C23A6D6F for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 11:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgTZ8MCHyC83 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC923A6C1A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri,  5 Jun 2009 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so1226226qwe.31 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6AILru5Mf0QgDPg/pdsbbTatCXocz+aBEHXI3k3YIzU=; b=HOHxleTuDoyTUgSsY+7Rbmc58Ceg93uBo6tiFjvpk63ZDQXV6od91405XZQZ0FIaDY 5ej7PXVBBBuBBZAaXDQFDhMP9Seju9rBi/Esp1Qhd6yEr+lA+mK0EJLqfsOzanZdBcy7 hykEiei8hGpB2MTR3Heq8oo7/g3xy1IoZcykg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IUTyKvhvIp3AszziY84ZtMzosUO54Pg9lGBC3WogsM7myfgNx0qczuHfUYUGejowaY AtrJrbv8GrXrUYE9bXzOJQQeUw4fjcMs/YCM7dZ9ViN01rYg8QiyyKsAyxx2/wHBG2L4 esnbzQPAvgrApk5w0DcZ33q+qRC9S2hcvVCPk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.74.212 with SMTP id v20mr931170qcj.16.1244225442159; Fri,  05 Jun 2009 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:10:42 -0400
Message-ID: <e4b033900906051110q62dc0b44pddc2944de34cc75d@mail.gmail.com>
From: Munjo Yu <munjo.yu@gmail.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Tools-discuss] ABNF parser C code generator is now available on the IETF tools web page
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:10:43 -0000

Hi all,

Thanks to 	Henrik Levkowetz, I have a link on the tools web page to
our ABNF parser generator for C.
Our ABNF parser generator generates "complete" C code from a ABNF
definition file with some additional user-provided information.
It's still an early version. Yet, if anyone wants an ABNF parser
generator but doesn't want to deal with the generated-but-edited code
hassle,
this is worth giving it a try, since it was used to develop network
products which are now been deployed in Korea Telecom.
The parser generator is called VTC, or VineGen Text Compiler, and its
downloadables are available for Linux, Solaris, and Windows.
A couple of examples are included; SIP and SDP, and automated tests
with those examples are included for Linux and Solaris, so
you can play around with raw messages and ABNF definitions without
spending too much time.

To have a look search for "Generate ABNF Parsers (with extensions)"
from the tools web page(http://tools.ietf.org/).
Or directly go to http://vinegen.com/metabbs/metabbs.php/board/Download.
A draft has been submitted for the extensions used in VTC, and it can
be found at:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kim-abnf-codegen-00.txt

I'd like to send thanks to the following people for their kindly help:

Henrik Levkowetz,
Lisa Dusselt
Dave Crocker
Margaret (Wasserman?)

Thanks,
-Munjo

From rjsparks@nostrum.com  Thu Jun 11 11:45:47 2009
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1898828C15C for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9ZWMjMEN-Nw for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A883A6BEE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-232.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5BIjo1K063146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:45:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-Id: <370428C1-C9EE-405D-9802-86AC75A3BECD@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:45:50 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] odd (but not critical) bug in tools.ietf.org/html
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:45:47 -0000

It finds a really odd title for http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434

(see the resultant html <title> and highlighting in the document).

Just in case this is a heisenbug, what I'm seeing is

     <title>RFC 5434 - It is also important to recognize the timing  
constraints.  As described in detail below, the deadline for  
scheduling BOFs is approximately six weeks prior to an IETF meeting.   
Working backwards</title>

RjS

From rjsparks@nostrum.com  Thu Jun 11 12:49:08 2009
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62683A6801 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yg8LUdgwG16G for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC83D3A6A37 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-232.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5BJnCj5067817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:49:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-Id: <3C7FBFC3-2E32-491F-BDAB-FF9EE999FB3D@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:49:12 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Nits 2.11.11 Nit
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:49:09 -0000

This might be old and well known, but its only recently really causing  
me (very mild) grief:

I'm having to look at several documents that have sections headings  
that go 4 or 5 outline levels deep.

The current nits engine is seeing things like "Section 23.1.2.1" as:

   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   == There are 1 instance of lines with non-RFC3330-compliant IPv4  
addresses
      in the document.  If these are example addresses, they should be  
changed.
I can't think of how to _not_ match these things, but perhaps it could  
at least provide the line-number of the match to help speed up manual  
inspection?

RjS

From fluffy@cisco.com  Thu Jun 11 15:42:44 2009
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEC63A6DFE for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.573
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QE8u+aAczjwM for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195273A6DF4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,204,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="169183470"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2009 22:42:51 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5BMgpwU004222;  Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:51 -0700
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5BMgoge011610; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:42:50 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <79940876-7BE3-45C9-B2BA-5EBD2E38DA82@messagingarchitects.com>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
References: <e4b033900905250612v1d756ffbyfb9f22329298fc6e@mail.gmail.com> <87CC2213-8387-41EC-A280-D47E7D6BC73C@messagingarchitects.com> <e4b033900906091058v51fb2e2fycb0a16d6849edf76@mail.gmail.com> <154BF1C1-B37C-4856-B4DE-0DAED221C3EC@messagingarchitects.com> <e4b033900906091523v60be9877sf3e17ac97394e1af@mail.gmail.com> <e4b033900906101820l7759609eoe27bdfb897941f3c@mail.gmail.com> <79940876-7BE3-45C9-B2BA-5EBD2E38DA82@messagingarchitects.com>
Message-Id: <159A1A44-CA46-4806-8549-483DD8C08868@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:42:49 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=324; t=1244760172; x=1245624172; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20ABNF=20parser=20generator |Sender:=20; bh=Swh+chT1fkhiBNdj4FcQTE2fOuhBtHqokQAihA5jqnU=; b=S2di0CIyzVc8jjty1OKNtcmFThNBzU8LNfWANkZGL1Evhd70VGJDfHoo4g SPw/EHORR0djXvgmIRxs8GXgweyz4oAynPcLwJ6Rhh0Z50OBduODsenaoA85 26zv/dIsw9IQGqgzr+Ok534Dn4UKjQbKe/cfp3YRdxfbdDo9net7U=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); 
Cc: VineCEO <jskim@vinegen.com>, Pasi Eronen <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>, MSKang <mskang@vinegen.com>, Munjo Yu <munjo.yu@gmail.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] ABNF parser generator
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:42:44 -0000

Hi All,

I just wanted to forward to the tools list some work that folks are  
doing on an ABNF code generator. The draft is at

draft-kim-abnf-codegen

I'll let the authors of this tell you more about it but it seemed like  
this list might have some of the people that would find this  
interesting.

Cullen


From mnot@mnot.net  Sun Jun 14 21:17:07 2009
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BC93A6ABC for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.195
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.596, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QhclsmUAhgQk for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC593A6ADB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [118.208.249.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA05D23E3E9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <280C28B7-EB2C-4B1C-8B39-1DAA26185D8C@mnot.net>
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
To: Tools <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:17:05 +1000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] XMPP logs
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:17:07 -0000

Hi,

A few suggestions for making the XMPP logs (e..g, <http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/httpbis/ 
 >) a bit more readable:

* For the index page:
   * Run a cron job to delete empty log files (0 bytes)
   * Remove unnecessary information: "IndexOptions  
+SuppressDescription +SuppressLastModified +SuppressIcon +NameWidth=10"
   * Sort newest first: "IndexOrderDefault Descending Name"
   * Make it more cache-friendly: "IndexOptions +TrackModified"

* For individual (i.e., day) archives, I see that they're currently  
generated in .txt, but used to be .html. Is there any way we could get  
them back as HTML, with some styling? I'm willing to work on code /  
CSS to help...

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/


From munjo.yu@gmail.com  Mon Jun 15 09:12:21 2009
Return-Path: <munjo.yu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D643A6891 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1MO92DTdTjrr for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (mail-qy0-f176.google.com [209.85.221.176]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7274A3A6A4D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so319577qyk.29 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lQ16XimQK2+sg7uxSinxSLIQTeTeTV6ynWiOZ9Jn2uo=; b=ZaTIkvXCNIY5yPZXP5UyC21c3Lt+WBPwdrSQQ5FUCEHr3ayEUyuO4PIe5gkHOLcv7p XtjlctZY3LbnciK8h/EsG0Km6darZLc5Z7gt48/6mqBd1eNurlXAh3rm0HtON7XGJOMD A/H4cspaNVzM148Lfz0jRtL9YIIMZ0mP4ojfo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OAQyPkE0DA0BBxVkOn+gNVPVPmnWM7T0rWzLa4eKdoTcs3Vx0W3WUmObBS8a5xGlns mIbRujBKDpqwOFGalo9OJnV6P0Wx0DwNPZcasZvDv1NBya7o5GqXKsG2niZWDbvEIkQT jA4yZDt5ehkVvBL+hgERtTERvRGvVblzACz4U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.80.3 with SMTP id r3mr1377722qck.104.1245082331527; Mon,  15 Jun 2009 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <159A1A44-CA46-4806-8549-483DD8C08868@cisco.com>
References: <e4b033900905250612v1d756ffbyfb9f22329298fc6e@mail.gmail.com> <87CC2213-8387-41EC-A280-D47E7D6BC73C@messagingarchitects.com> <e4b033900906091058v51fb2e2fycb0a16d6849edf76@mail.gmail.com> <154BF1C1-B37C-4856-B4DE-0DAED221C3EC@messagingarchitects.com> <e4b033900906091523v60be9877sf3e17ac97394e1af@mail.gmail.com> <e4b033900906101820l7759609eoe27bdfb897941f3c@mail.gmail.com> <79940876-7BE3-45C9-B2BA-5EBD2E38DA82@messagingarchitects.com> <159A1A44-CA46-4806-8549-483DD8C08868@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:12:11 -0400
Message-ID: <e4b033900906150912v16184f4bj7232b8c07fb459f8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Munjo Yu <munjo.yu@gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, VineCEO <jskim@vinegen.com>, Pasi Eronen <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>, MSKang <mskang@vinegen.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] ABNF parser generator
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:12:21 -0000

Thanks Cullen.

Here is some background for the draft.

Many Internet applications, like VOIP and instant messaging clients,
involve processing network protocol messages.
 A key part of this processing is to decode(parse) messages as they
are received from the network, and
to encode attributes into messages. As message decoding/encoding
represent the front line of interaction
between the application and the outside world, the correctness of
decoding/encoding is crucial; any bugs
in decoding/encoding can prevent the application from doing its tasks.
Poor performance in decoding message
can be a bottleneck of the application. In the context of in-network
application such as proxies, where achieving
high throughput is essential, decoding must also be efficient.
Hand-written(fully or partially) network message processing code has
still been dominant but has become
increasingly error-prone. Especially, implementing a correct and
efficient network protocol message decoder is
a difficult task. Hand-written code is typically error-prone and
difficult to maintain.
To address these problems, not surprisingly, some code generators have
been built and used.
They support various languages and the "completeness" level of their
generated code varies from bare minimum
to complete. One observation is that no c code generator which
generates "complete" decoding/encoding C code
was caught by our radar. C language is the most popular language in
the network protocol implementation, and yet
no complete ABNF code generator. So, we developed our own ABNF code
generator and for that, had to
use some extensions to the existing ABNF rules since the standard ABNF
is not complete for code generation, by design.

The draft describes those extensions. One thing I have to note, is
that we had to use the historically controversial
feature that was dropped from the standard after all the discussion.
That is non-sequential group notation. Without
this feature, it would not have been possible to generate "complete"
code. Some attributes can come in any order
with varying multiplicity in the message header, for instance. Without
this feature, the user would have to edit
generated code to cope with this kind of situation. Without complete
code generation, one cannot enforce full control
over message decoding/encoding layer to make sure bug-free and high performance.

Any questions and comments will be priceless for us!

Thanks,
-Munjo Yu, VineGen Inc




On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Cullen Jennings<fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just wanted to forward to the tools list some work that folks are doing on
> an ABNF code generator. The draft is at
>
> draft-kim-abnf-codegen
>
> I'll let the authors of this tell you more about it but it seemed like this
> list might have some of the people that would find this interesting.
>
> Cullen
>
>

From stefan@aaa-sec.com  Thu Jun 18 12:54:42 2009
Return-Path: <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6338228C127 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.609
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.246, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHz+ap3s92bu for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.95.112]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72D3A6981 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 27586 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 19:54:56 -0000
Received: from s34.loopia.se (HELO s42.loopia.se) ([194.9.94.70]) (envelope-sender <stefan@aaa-sec.com>) by s87.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; 18 Jun 2009 19:54:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 73898 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 19:54:48 -0000
Received: from 213-64-142-21-no153.business.telia.com (HELO [192.168.0.17]) (stefan@fiddler.nu@[213.64.142.21]) (envelope-sender <stefan@aaa-sec.com>) by s42.loopia.se (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; 18 Jun 2009 19:54:48 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:54:47 +0200
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
To: <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <C6606827.2B78%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Thread-Topic: Java application for editing nroff formatted Internet Drafts
Thread-Index: AcnwTFiE2JIJGk9dW02gi8GD9tzjaQAAklSx
In-Reply-To: <C6606451.2B70%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3328206888_12636446"
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Java application for editing nroff formatted Internet Drafts
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:54:42 -0000

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--B_3328206888_12636446
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

I know that many turn to XML or word for their internet draft editing, but =
I
still like the old nroff format better.

The only problem is that I didn=B9t have a good convenient tool to instantly
convert my nroff text into the final txt version while editing.
So I got tired of the issue and wrote my own editing tool in java.

The result is available from my website for free.
http://aaa-sec.com/nroffedit/index.html

I use it for all my nroff editing and it works super for me.  The output
from my application is identical to the nroff compiler I used to use
Knowing that there are some nroff hackers still out there, Is this somethin=
g
that would be of general interest?
Is there something better out there for nroff that I don=B9t know about?

Any feedback is welcome.

/Stefan


--B_3328206888_12636446
Content-type: text/html;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Java application for editing nroff formatted Internet Drafts</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:11pt=
'>I know that many turn to XML or word for their internet draft editing, but=
 I still like the old nroff format better.<BR>
<BR>
The only problem is that I didn&#8217;t have a good convenient tool to inst=
antly convert my nroff text into the final txt version while editing.<BR>
So I got tired of the issue and wrote my own editing tool in java.<BR>
<BR>
The result is available from my website for free.<BR>
<a href=3D"http://aaa-sec.com/nroffedit/index.html">http://aaa-sec.com/nroffe=
dit/index.html</a><BR>
<BR>
I use it for all my nroff editing and it works super for me. &nbsp;The outp=
ut from my application is identical to the nroff compiler I used to use<BR>
Knowing that there are some nroff hackers still out there, Is this somethin=
g that would be of general interest?<BR>
Is there something better out there for nroff that I don&#8217;t know about=
?<BR>
<BR>
Any feedback is welcome.<BR>
<BR>
/Stefan<BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>


--B_3328206888_12636446--



From henrik@levkowetz.com  Wed Jun 24 06:07:46 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45223A6B48 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cR3WLu7acmOs for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73933A683F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:59560) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MJSCc-0000Ei-0T; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:07:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4A422525.9070100@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:07:49 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <370428C1-C9EE-405D-9802-86AC75A3BECD@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <370428C1-C9EE-405D-9802-86AC75A3BECD@nostrum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rjsparks@nostrum.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] odd (but not critical) bug in tools.ietf.org/html
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:07:46 -0000

On 2009-06-11 20:45 Robert Sparks said the following:
> It finds a really odd title for http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434
> 
> (see the resultant html <title> and highlighting in the document).
> 
> Just in case this is a heisenbug, what I'm seeing is
> 
>      <title>RFC 5434 - It is also important to recognize the timing  
> constraints.  As described in detail below, the deadline for  
> scheduling BOFs is approximately six weeks prior to an IETF meeting.   
> Working backwards</title>

The htmlization code uses the title available from the rfc index if
available, but sometimes the actual file is available and converted
before the index information, and the it picks the first text that
looks like a title.  For this draft, that was _not_ the correct title,
as that extended all the way to the margins...

I've had the files regenerated, which fixed this.


Best,

	Henrik

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Wed Jun 24 06:26:26 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC92F28C2BD for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWMIrOoMhhbW for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDDA3A699A for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:59625) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MJSUh-0005Ay-V3; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4A422987.80506@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:26:31 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <3C7FBFC3-2E32-491F-BDAB-FF9EE999FB3D@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C7FBFC3-2E32-491F-BDAB-FF9EE999FB3D@nostrum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rjsparks@nostrum.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: Tools Discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Nits 2.11.11 Nit
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:26:26 -0000

Hi Robert,

On 2009-06-11 21:49 Robert Sparks said the following:
> This might be old and well known, but its only recently really causing  
> me (very mild) grief:
> 
> I'm having to look at several documents that have sections headings  
> that go 4 or 5 outline levels deep.
> 
> The current nits engine is seeing things like "Section 23.1.2.1" as:
> 
>    Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
>     
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    == There are 1 instance of lines with non-RFC3330-compliant IPv4  
> addresses
>       in the document.  If these are example addresses, they should be  
> changed.
> 
> I can't think of how to _not_ match these things, but perhaps it could  
> at least provide the line-number of the match to help speed up manual  
> inspection?

If you use idnits in --verbose mode (or for the webservice, append
'&verbose=1' to the URL query arguments) you'll get an itemized list
of the exact offending (presumptive) IPv4 addresses and the line on
which they were found.


Best,

	Henrik



From dcrocker@bbiw.net  Wed Jun 24 09:01:00 2009
Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3413A6CBB for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IeZ+Qz77ZE2B for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B5B3A6BCE for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ppp-67-124-89-55.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.124.89.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OG1566016830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org.>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:01:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4A424DC0.9090804@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:01:04 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Wiki package being used for IETF pages?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:01:00 -0000

Howdy,

I've got a project underway that might migrate into ietf.org and I'd like to 
structure it to be compatible with the packages already used there.

This will probably be in the form of a wiki, so that folks from the community 
can contribute entries.

I've looked around the wiki.tools.ietf.org area but can't see an indication of 
what open source wiki package is being used.

Can you point me at the right package?

Thanks.

d/

ps.  There is a problem with the "More details on the individual milestone items 
is available at  the Wiki ToolPriorityList" link:

    <http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wiki/ToolPriorityList>

on

    <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/about>

Firefox says it has a loop.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

From Ted.Lemon@nominum.com  Wed Jun 24 17:35:09 2009
Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685E33A6D99 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.073
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.526,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0v+W065jRp2j for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FDF28C120 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSkLGTay37hd7gGIrdSm3WymhcLQGAPzN@postini.com; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:26 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70F81BCE6C for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uma.here (71.32.40.139) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:23 -0700
Message-ID: <BF1F0F26-895B-46A5-985E-17B6B3B89984@nominum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:35:22 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Approval for initial versions of wg documents...
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:35:09 -0000

I just got an approval request for an initial version of a new dhc  
document, and I noticed a UI issue that might be worth thinking  
about.   Here's the message:

> If the document has already been approved by the other chair, then
> the Web site will display an appropriate indication.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_init_rev_approval.cgi?command=record_approval&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce

There's more text above that, but I'm a little sleep-deprived right  
now, and when I clicked on this link, I *thought* I was going to a  
page where I would be asked to review the status and then approve or  
not.   But in fact, clicking on that link is what approved the  
document.   It worked out fine, because I did intend to approve the  
document, but I think from a UI perspective the more expected behavior  
would be that the approval would be triggered by some action on the  
web page being linked to, not by clicking on the link itself.

I mention this because the same thing happened to my co-chair before  
the previous IETF, only in his case the working group hadn't approved  
the draft, so we wound up with a working group document for an item  
that the working group hadn't taken on.

I realize that I'm in a poor position to request changes since I  
haven't been able to contribute during any code sprints thus far, but  
nevertheless I thought I'd mention this in case it makes sense to you  
and someone has time to fix it.


From henrik@levkowetz.com  Thu Jun 25 04:04:09 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B609D3A6A78 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ujpUzeXShvA for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AAC28C10E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:63252) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MJmkI-0005oe-OS; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:03:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4A43599E.2020707@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:03:58 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
References: <4A424DC0.9090804@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A424DC0.9090804@bbiw.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Wiki package being used for IETF pages?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:04:09 -0000

Hi Dave,

On 2009-06-24 18:01 Dave CROCKER said the following:
> Howdy,
> 
> I've got a project underway that might migrate into ietf.org and I'd like to 
> structure it to be compatible with the packages already used there.
> 
> This will probably be in the form of a wiki, so that folks from the community 
> can contribute entries.
> 
> I've looked around the wiki.tools.ietf.org area but can't see an indication of 
> what open source wiki package is being used.
> 
> Can you point me at the right package?

"Trac", http://trac.edgewall.org/

> Thanks.
> 
> d/
> 
> ps.  There is a problem with the "More details on the individual milestone items 
> is available at  the Wiki ToolPriorityList" link:
> 
>     <http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wiki/ToolPriorityList>
> 
> on
> 
>     <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/about>
> 
> Firefox says it has a loop.

Obsolete link.  There's a new Tools wiki at http://tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac,
but it doesn't currently have the milestone details information.  I've removed
the link.


	Henrik


From fred@cisco.com  Fri Jun 26 15:18:31 2009
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7C73A68C9 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZOACMZv28w3s for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EE33A6876 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,298,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="83160839"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2009 22:18:50 +0000
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5QMInJY031842;  Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:49 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5QMImEr008805; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:18:49 GMT
Message-Id: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:46 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1152; t=1246054729; x=1246918729; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20mumble.=20idnits.=20mumble.=20xml2rfc.=20mumble . |Sender:=20; bh=ZS+MqHwiE3elM8/B1fUvB7B2rOzA9hJZ2gu3ys1dTV0=; b=PTs+v2WtrU5X/Z6dWJj+pTBENJRawdsjMnb194y7USJLOFqI4NAHBxwIFf ZinXHoY92iimonJEuUYasycITuIZ0L4XJ395apmLMs7J0HHicQe9k31POB16 Dy1vAF5sZJ;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); 
Cc: XML2RFC mailing list <xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:18:31 -0000

<rant>
idnits says:

   == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate,  
even if
      it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a  
paragraph with
      a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?

      RFC 2119 paragraph 2 text:
      "The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL  
NOT",
       "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
       this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119."

      ... text found in draft:
      "The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT,  
SHOULD, SHOULD
.............^
       NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
       document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]."


There are in fact several issues: a space, some quotation marks, and a  
left and right bracket.

Fixing that (copying the text from RFC 2119 to get the comparison  
exactly right), xml2rfc now complains about the normative reference to  
RFC 2119: the reference is there but no place in the document refers  
to it.

!@#$%

</rant>

Thanks. I feel better now.

:-)

From fred@cisco.com  Fri Jun 26 15:22:34 2009
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39F93A6BCD for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7CYaurW+3th for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7F73A6876 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,298,1243814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="83162657"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2009 22:22:53 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5QMMqGS014316 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:22:52 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5QMMqAu008677 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:22:52 GMT
Message-Id: <2505469F-D116-475D-9233-24769955E759@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--687683742
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:22:52 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=9935; t=1246054972; x=1246918972; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20http=3A//tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits.pyh t |Sender:=20; bh=82cHWlczeDIllKbbzJqDxtF3zl2lb/gPlP7cNOEopCI=; b=n/35flHGlnsCOPcYRwca47jbfdEobiI34sb0RIzbhfy5YBL4LXR5NAAwgf YfeFgkdBBWNDrokFAAg7IBrptWmnaHDUHlWNzOlLEtcbrXrjmRoanQJMDt68 TvWF4vmFCg;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); 
Subject: [Tools-discuss] http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits.pyht
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:22:35 -0000

--Apple-Mail-4--687683742
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

OK, mumblefratz. Having fixed the RFC 2119 statement to be literally  
that which RFC 2119 requires, I get the following.

What do I have to do to get the file to pass idnits with the exact RFC  
2119 inclusion *and* dereferencing the bibliographic reference to RFC  
2119?



------------------------
idnits 2.11.11

tmp/translate-03.txt:
tmp/translate-03.txt(355): RFC 2119 keyword:    MUST be updated.  This  
is different from [RFC2765], since [RFC2765].
tmp/translate-03.txt(408): RFC 2119 keyword:    perform path MTU  
discovery the translator MUST always include an IPv6.
tmp/translate-03.txt(429): RFC 2119 keyword:    packet larger than  
1280 bytes the IPv4 packet MUST be fragmented.
tmp/translate-03.txt(458): RFC 2119 keyword:       Precedence".  An  
implementation of a translator SHOULD provide the.
tmp/translate-03.txt(495): RFC 2119 keyword:    unexpired source route  
option is present then the packet MUST instead.
tmp/translate-03.txt(497): RFC 2119 keyword:    failed" (Type 3/Code  
5) error message SHOULD be returned to the.
tmp/translate-03.txt(542): RFC 2119 keyword:    IPv4 packet and the  
checksum field is zero the translator SHOULD drop.
tmp/translate-03.txt(545): RFC 2119 keyword:    fragments other than  
the first it SHOULD silently drop the packet,.
tmp/translate-03.txt(549): RFC 2119 keyword:    checksum field is zero  
the translator MUST compute the missing UDP.
tmp/translate-03.txt(551): RFC 2119 keyword:    SHOULD maintain a  
counter of how many UDP checksums are generated in.
tmp/translate-03.txt(723): RFC 2119 keyword:    recalculation and  
updating of the transport-layer headers MUST be.
tmp/translate-03.txt(732): RFC 2119 keyword:    performed.  UDP/IPv4  
datagrams with a checksum of zero MAY be dropped.
tmp/translate-03.txt(733): RFC 2119 keyword:    and MAY have their  
checksum calculated for injection into the IPv6.
tmp/translate-03.txt(734): RFC 2119 keyword:    domain.  This choice  
SHOULD be under configuration control..
tmp/translate-03.txt(753): RFC 2119 keyword:    header and the  
transport-layer headers MUST be performed.  This is.
tmp/translate-03.txt(835): RFC 2119 keyword:       translator SHOULD  
provide the ability to ignore the IPv6 traffic.
tmp/translate-03.txt(903): RFC 2119 keyword:    then the packet MUST  
NOT be translated, and an ICMPv6 "parameter.
tmp/translate-03.txt(906): RFC 2119 keyword:    Segments Left field,  
SHOULD be returned to the sender..

   Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
   http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      No issues found here.

   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt 
:
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   ** Missing revision: the document name given in the document,
      'draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate', does not give the document  
revision number

   == Mismatching filename: the document gives the document name as
      'draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate', but the file name used is  
'translate-03'


   Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      No issues found here.

   Miscellaneous warnings:
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was first
      submitted on or after 10 November 2008.  Does it really need the
      disclaimer?


   Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

      (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative  
references
      to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

   == Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 957, but no  
explicit
      reference was found in the text
      '[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate  
Requi...'


      Summary: 1 error (**), 2 warnings (==), 1 comment (--).

--Apple-Mail-4--687683742
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; =
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><base =
href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits.pyht"><div =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; color: black; =
text-align: left; ">OK, mumblefratz. Having fixed the RFC 2119 statement =
to be literally that which RFC 2119 requires, I get the =
following.</div><div style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; =
color: black; text-align: left; "><br></div><div style=3D"font-family: =
Helvetica; font-size: 12px; color: black; text-align: left; ">What do I =
have to do to get the file to pass idnits with the exact RFC 2119 =
inclusion *and* dereferencing the bibliographic reference to RFC =
2119?</div><div style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; color: =
black; text-align: left; "><br></div><div style=3D"font-family: =
Helvetica; font-size: 12px; color: black; text-align: left; =
"><br></div><div style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; =
color: black; text-align: left; "><br></div><div style=3D"font-family: =
Helvetica; font-size: 12px; color: black; text-align: left; =
">------------------------</div><pre style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
white-space: pre-wrap;">idnits 2.11.11 </pre><pre style=3D"word-wrap: =
break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;">
tmp/translate-03.txt:
tmp/translate-03.txt(355): RFC 2119 keyword:    MUST be updated.  This =
is different from [RFC2765], since [RFC2765].
tmp/translate-03.txt(408): RFC 2119 keyword:    perform path MTU =
discovery the translator MUST always include an IPv6.
tmp/translate-03.txt(429): RFC 2119 keyword:    packet larger than 1280 =
bytes the IPv4 packet MUST be fragmented.
tmp/translate-03.txt(458): RFC 2119 keyword:       Precedence".  An =
implementation of a translator SHOULD provide the.
tmp/translate-03.txt(495): RFC 2119 keyword:    unexpired source route =
option is present then the packet MUST instead.
tmp/translate-03.txt(497): RFC 2119 keyword:    failed" (Type 3/Code 5) =
error message SHOULD be returned to the.
tmp/translate-03.txt(542): RFC 2119 keyword:    IPv4 packet and the =
checksum field is zero the translator SHOULD drop.
tmp/translate-03.txt(545): RFC 2119 keyword:    fragments other than the =
first it SHOULD silently drop the packet,.
tmp/translate-03.txt(549): RFC 2119 keyword:    checksum field is zero =
the translator MUST compute the missing UDP.
tmp/translate-03.txt(551): RFC 2119 keyword:    SHOULD maintain a =
counter of how many UDP checksums are generated in.
tmp/translate-03.txt(723): RFC 2119 keyword:    recalculation and =
updating of the transport-layer headers MUST be.
tmp/translate-03.txt(732): RFC 2119 keyword:    performed.  UDP/IPv4 =
datagrams with a checksum of zero MAY be dropped.
tmp/translate-03.txt(733): RFC 2119 keyword:    and MAY have their =
checksum calculated for injection into the IPv6.
tmp/translate-03.txt(734): RFC 2119 keyword:    domain.  This choice =
SHOULD be under configuration control..
tmp/translate-03.txt(753): RFC 2119 keyword:    header and the =
transport-layer headers MUST be performed.  This is.
tmp/translate-03.txt(835): RFC 2119 keyword:       translator SHOULD =
provide the ability to ignore the IPv6 traffic.
tmp/translate-03.txt(903): RFC 2119 keyword:    then the packet MUST NOT =
be translated, and an ICMPv6 "parameter.
tmp/translate-03.txt(906): RFC 2119 keyword:    Segments Left field, =
SHOULD be returned to the sender..

  Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
  <a =
href=3D"http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)">http://trustee.ietf.org/lic=
ense-info)</a>:
  =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

     No issues found here.

  Checking nits according to <a =
href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt">http://www.ietf.org/i=
etf/1id-guidelines.txt</a>:
  =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

  ** Missing revision: the document name given in the document,
     'draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate', does not give the document revision =
number

  =3D=3D Mismatching filename: the document gives the document name as
     'draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate', but the file name used is =
'translate-03'


  Checking nits according to <a =
href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html">http://www.ietf.org/ID-Chec=
klist.html</a>:
  =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

     No issues found here.

  Miscellaneous warnings:
  =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

  -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was first
     submitted on or after 10 November 2008.  Does it really need the
     disclaimer?


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative =
references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

  =3D=3D Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 957, but no =
explicit
     reference was found in the text
     '[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate =
Requi...'


     Summary: 1 error (**), 2 warnings (=3D=3D), 1 comment (--).
</pre></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-4--687683742--

From dbharrington@comcast.net  Fri Jun 26 15:28:03 2009
Return-Path: <dbharrington@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EDA3A6C6B for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.466
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133,  BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id th6wAGpOuU1D for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C00A3A68C9 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8hFe1c00P1HzFnQ59mUJ5j; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:28:18 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.147.240.21]) by OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8mUH1c00Q0UQ6dC3amUHfP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:28:18 +0000
From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>
To: "'Fred Baker'" <fred@cisco.com>, <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:28:16 -0400
Message-ID: <019701c9f6ad$672fa2c0$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
In-reply-to: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com>
Thread-Index: Acn2rDdWXDSHte3MTkKZuqnhIStv4QAASMDg
Cc: 'XML2RFC mailing list' <xml2rfc@xml.resource.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [xml2rfc] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:28:03 -0000

glad we could help ;-)

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml2rfc-bounces@xml.resource.org 
> [mailto:xml2rfc-bounces@xml.resource.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:19 PM
> To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
> Cc: XML2RFC mailing list
> Subject: [xml2rfc] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
> 
> <rant>
> idnits says:
> 
>    == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 
> boilerplate,  
> even if
>       it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a  
> paragraph with
>       a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?
> 
>       RFC 2119 paragraph 2 text:
>       "The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL

> NOT",
>        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
in
>        this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC
2119."
> 
>       ... text found in draft:
>       "The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT,  
> SHOULD, SHOULD
> .............^
>        NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
>        document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]."
> 
> 
> There are in fact several issues: a space, some quotation 
> marks, and a  
> left and right bracket.
> 
> Fixing that (copying the text from RFC 2119 to get the comparison  
> exactly right), xml2rfc now complains about the normative 
> reference to  
> RFC 2119: the reference is there but no place in the document refers

> to it.
> 
> !@#$%
> 
> </rant>
> 
> Thanks. I feel better now.
> 
> :-)
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc mailing list
> xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org
> http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
> 


From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun 29 02:50:48 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B1E28C1E5 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdpOqs+ENbYw for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [194.146.105.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3973A6B0B for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:53429) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MLDQp-0002T2-NF; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:45:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4A488D4B.7030602@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:45:47 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: fred@cisco.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: XML2RFC mailing list <xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:50:48 -0000

Hi Fred,

On 2009-06-27 00:18 Fred Baker said the following:
> <rant>
> idnits says:
> 
>    == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate,  
> even if
>       it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a  
> paragraph with
>       a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?
> 
>       RFC 2119 paragraph 2 text:
>       "The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL  
> NOT",
>        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
>        this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119."
> 
>       ... text found in draft:
>       "The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT,  
> SHOULD, SHOULD
> .............^
>        NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
>        document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]."
> 
> 
> There are in fact several issues: a space, some quotation marks, and a  
> left and right bracket.
> 
> Fixing that (copying the text from RFC 2119 to get the comparison  
> exactly right), xml2rfc now complains about the normative reference to  
> RFC 2119: the reference is there but no place in the document refers  
> to it.

Idnits should accept "... [RFC2119]." -- if it doesn't, it's a bug.  Let
me know.


> !@#$%
> 
> </rant>
> 
> Thanks. I feel better now.

Ok ;-)


	Henrik

From fred@cisco.com  Mon Jun 29 04:42:50 2009
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86623A6DAD for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.567
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rGP5MAzik+e for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BEC3A6AC2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,309,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="181213596"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2009 11:43:10 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5TBhAgx014755;  Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:43:10 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5TBhA5B000967; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:43:10 GMT
Message-Id: <F62A31A1-B126-420E-A162-6A5A2CAB8B25@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A488D4B.7030602@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:43:07 -0700
References: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com> <4A488D4B.7030602@levkowetz.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1153; t=1246275790; x=1247139790; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Tools-discuss]=20mumble.=20idnits.=20m umble.=20xml2rfc.=20mumble. |Sender:=20; bh=IY8x0hpbex1wzWL2djFcDw9FtujW/JxohYMTKVZwWxM=; b=Xb7HMxsQN3R8yfuyo9lxmZV3MOaS/Q/soLcRKctfFZllUfhncUZi5h/pfL M67RQQ6OG/E6L5guKscl7yXclaQ+zQPVZhOEZpqlHcIs1TTj4NAarrBKXlDR MtBa9ZQI3X;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); 
Cc: XML2RFC mailing list <xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:42:51 -0000

On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:45 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

> Idnits should accept "... [RFC2119]." -- if it doesn't, it's a bug.   
> Let
> me know.

OK.

The form I have had it in for approximately ever and which made it  
through idnits was:

    The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,
    SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
    document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

It stopped accepting that. The text that shows in RFC 2119 is:

    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
    "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
    document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.

It accepts that as meeting the RFC 2119 requirement, but complains  
about not dereferencing <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

As of this morning, it accepts this without complaint:

    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
    "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
    document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

Thanks.

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun 29 05:33:03 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74D728C259 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R34sX3AaIfGs for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [194.146.105.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077A28C256 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:54254) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MLFxv-0006Hf-BW; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:28:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4A48B356.2040007@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:28:06 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com> <4A488D4B.7030602@levkowetz.com> <F62A31A1-B126-420E-A162-6A5A2CAB8B25@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F62A31A1-B126-420E-A162-6A5A2CAB8B25@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: fred@cisco.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: XML2RFC mailing list <xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:33:04 -0000

Hi Fred,

On 2009-06-29 13:43 Fred Baker said the following:
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:45 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> 
>> Idnits should accept "... [RFC2119]." -- if it doesn't, it's a bug.   
>> Let
>> me know.
> 
> OK.
> 
> The form I have had it in for approximately ever and which made it  
> through idnits was:
> 
>     The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,
>     SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this
>     document, are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
> 
> It stopped accepting that. The text that shows in RFC 2119 is:
> 
>     The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>     "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
>     document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
> 
> It accepts that as meeting the RFC 2119 requirement, but complains  
> about not dereferencing <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
> 
> As of this morning, it accepts this without complaint:
> 
>     The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>     "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
>     document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
> 
> Thanks.

Ok, good so far -- I'll go back and check if the change in handling of
quotes is a regression or an intended change in some earlier version.


	Henrik


From henrik@levkowetz.com  Mon Jun 29 06:02:59 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7BD3A6DC3 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.266
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJqhKB4v1p3M for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [194.146.105.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FE228C277 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57701 helo=brunello.autonomica.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MLGQU-0002Yp-16; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:57:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4A48BA41.7040102@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:57:37 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <1EF5981D-D9B4-43CF-A22B-DC119523114F@cisco.com> <4A488D4B.7030602@levkowetz.com> <F62A31A1-B126-420E-A162-6A5A2CAB8B25@cisco.com> <4A48B356.2040007@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A48B356.2040007@levkowetz.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: fred@cisco.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: XML2RFC mailing list <xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] mumble. idnits. mumble. xml2rfc. mumble.
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:02:59 -0000

Hi again,

On 2009-06-29 14:28 Henrik Levkowetz said the following:
...
>> As of this morning, it accepts this without complaint:
>>
>>     The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>>     "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
>>     document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
>>
>> Thanks.
> 
> Ok, good so far -- I'll go back and check if the change in handling of
> quotes is a regression or an intended change in some earlier version.

It seems the current handling of the 2119 text (requiring quotes around the
key words) has been the same in idnits since 21 Apr 2006.  I haven't checked
every single release since then, so it's possible some release had a bug
which caused it to accept quote-less 2119 text.  It's also possible that the
checks used by the previous secretariat might have permitted quote-less 2119
text.


	Henrik

From jgs@bgp.nu  Mon Jun 29 07:12:41 2009
Return-Path: <jgs@bgp.nu>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940A83A6951 for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.043
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KKfH2lZ8RFHw for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgp.nu (bgp.nu [216.117.214.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF1428C28D for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.13.201] (75-151-14-10-Michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.151.14.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EA416145D3 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <A121AD3A-B30D-43D3-9407-3B7B488C21DA@bgp.nu>
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:12:57 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:47:50 -0700
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:12:41 -0000

Folks,

When checking the nits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt (http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt 
), idnits complains:

   == Outdated reference: A later version (-03) exists of
      draft-ietf-rtgwg-ordered-fib-02

However, no such later version actually exists, -02 is really the  
latest.

Not sure why idnits is confused.  FYI.

--John

From henrik@levkowetz.com  Tue Jun 30 05:47:56 2009
Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDC828C3BC for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnLu6xU5Rf4a for <tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C8D28C3A2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:60062) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1MLckv-0001eT-Ng; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:48:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4A4A098D.20603@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:48:13 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
References: <A121AD3A-B30D-43D3-9407-3B7B488C21DA@bgp.nu>
In-Reply-To: <A121AD3A-B30D-43D3-9407-3B7B488C21DA@bgp.nu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jgs@bgp.nu, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.11.11 feedback
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:47:56 -0000

Hi John,

On 2009-06-29 16:12 John G. Scudder said the following:
> Folks,
> 
> When checking the nits on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt (http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-05.txt 
> ), idnits complains:
> 
>    == Outdated reference: A later version (-03) exists of
>       draft-ietf-rtgwg-ordered-fib-02
> 
> However, no such later version actually exists, -02 is really the  
> latest.
> 
> Not sure why idnits is confused.  FYI.

Gremlins in the state file on the tools servers.  Fixed.


Best,

	Henrik
