From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 7 07:22:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEDE9E8009 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:22:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.742 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Jp3H6P4nWyL for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6179E800A for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p67EMCGZ088094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:22:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:22:21 -0700 Message-Id: <7EA93FDD-B661-484B-91F4-20B7E8E03975@vpnc.org> To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] Direct submission of drafts? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:22:29 -0000 Greetings again. I have started getting comments on my ietf CLI tool = . One person asked if I = could add the ability to do draft submission from the command line. = Currently, one goes to and does = some button pushing which leads to file submission. Is there a direct = URL for submission that could be used? --Paul Hoffman From mnot@mnot.net Sat Jul 9 20:01:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDBA21F8A97 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:01:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.840, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hw5TBQgTXphj for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF5B21F8A7A for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.72.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A020A509D9 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 23:01:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:01:34 +1000 Message-Id: To: IETF TOOLS discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] Trac change? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:01:45 -0000 Have the stylesheets or something else in Trac changed? It looks = substantially different, all of the sudden. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Sun Jul 10 18:51:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E54521F84EC for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:51:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.79 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOrla62ieuXH for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.20.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D14221F8876 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acmse02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.20.226]) by acintmta01.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id p6B1pe5Q002146 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:51:40 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by acmse02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 1c00_1724_51de3200_ab60_11e0_ab91_001d0969ab06; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:51:39 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.5]:47587) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:51:41 +0900 Message-ID: <4E1A5705.2090607@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:51:01 +0900 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst=22?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Tools-discuss] Too much escaping in ID announcement abstracts (was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-vcarddav-thing-02.txt) X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:51:49 -0000 Dear IETF Tools experts, I'm not sure who is responsible for this, but maybe you can tell me (or just forward this request). As you can see in the announcement below, and also at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg38817.html, there is some unnecessary (and confusing) escaping going on in the abstract of ID announcements. I also seem to remember that the same thing can happen in a title. With kind regards, Martin. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-vcarddav-thing-02.txt Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:09:14 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : vCard KIND:application Author(s) : Peter Saint-Andre Filename : draft-saintandre-vcarddav-thing-02.txt Pages : 6 Date : 2011-07-10 This document defines a value of "application" for the vCard KIND property so that vCards can be used to represent software applications. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-vcarddav-thing-02.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-vcarddav-thing-02.txt _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From julian.reschke@gmx.de Mon Jul 11 01:03:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62C321F88D8 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.574 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.975, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Dr5Z6xvV5q1 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 197F721F88C6 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2011 08:03:01 -0000 Received: from p508FCD67.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [80.143.205.103] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 11 Jul 2011 10:03:01 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+xj+RGWD+xBwViBTVWBUw1WYjYOp1gHba4aA4cBm okR1i/LQmIrmZX Message-ID: <4E1AAE2E.8010805@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:02:54 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IETF TOOLS discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Mark Nottingham Subject: [Tools-discuss] Draft submission tools regression X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:03:05 -0000 Hi there, the new submission tool fails to extract author names from ... long author lists (in this case, a 9 name list [1]). The old tool did this properly (or maybe failed in a less obvious way). Best regards, Julian From julian.reschke@gmx.de Wed Jul 13 05:13:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B7A21F8B35 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:13:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.905, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqkbZzxQ4Cy8 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 07D5121F8B34 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2011 12:13:46 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 13 Jul 2011 14:13:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/FiWEJobfF7bFdHMvjwG19drYXxuXENJcHra+j2u D1hGbLsQXj5j+E Message-ID: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:13:44 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IETF TOOLS discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org ICS files X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:13:49 -0000 Hi, trying to subscribe to one of the auto-generated calendars such as ...when I import this into Thunderbird/Lightning it doesn't get the timezones right; however Google Calendar seems to be happy. Lightning Bug? Spec bug? Calendar file bug? Best regards, Julian From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Wed Jul 13 17:19:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B935011E80D3 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.682 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMHqAgIQurWc for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114F511E80B5 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6E0J6uH044176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:19:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:19:15 -0700 Message-Id: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:19:17 -0000 Greetings again. I would like to extend the "ietf command-line tool" = functionality to include knowing when an RFC has been obsoleted. I could = write a parser for rfc-index.xml, but I would guess at least two or = three of you have already done so. Free code would be appreciated. --Paul Hoffman From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu Jul 14 00:50:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DC221F8879 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:50:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.169 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.570, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5zluTUR0nKg for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B308321F8872 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2011 07:50:24 -0000 Received: from p508FD277.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [80.143.210.119] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 14 Jul 2011 09:50:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+8FGhjnxq8YIBlQfR/bqtaCTpFezlKNzwILyZ9f6 aD9h9JVrufsVJ2 Message-ID: <4E1E9FB8.9080003@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:50:16 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:50:28 -0000 On 2011-07-14 02:19, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. I would like to extend the "ietf command-line tool" functionality to include knowing when an RFC has been obsoleted. I could write a parser for rfc-index.xml, but I would guess at least two or three of you have already done so. Free code would be appreciated. If you can call an XML parser plus either an XPath or XSLT implementation it should be dead simple... Best regards, Julian From henrik@levkowetz.com Thu Jul 14 01:49:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F16B21F8768 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:49:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.42 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.179, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ldtomyJS3KN for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiraz.levkowetz.com (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2:2b0:d0ff:feb0:7e87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818F121F8767 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42168 helo=vigonier.lan) by shiraz.levkowetz.com with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QhHbD-0004Ze-B2; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:48:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E1EAD6E.8090306@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:48:46 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: julian.reschke@gmx.de, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shiraz.levkowetz.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org ICS files X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:49:01 -0000 Hi Julian, On 2011-07-13 14:13 Julian Reschke said the following: > Hi, > > trying to subscribe to one of the auto-generated calendars such as > > > > > ...when I import this into Thunderbird/Lightning it doesn't get the > timezones right; however Google Calendar seems to be happy. And iCal also thinks it is fine. > Lightning Bug? Spec bug? Calendar file bug? I'm sure the right tweak to the calendar file will make it work, but I don't have the means to debug this... If you would be able to give me a tip about what needs tweaking, I'd be happy to do so. Best regards, Henrik From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 14 08:17:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD2321F8C3C for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:17:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.677 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fu+xSXLEphIg for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43B921F8C30 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6EFH8qu078889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:17:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:17:16 -0700 Message-Id: To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] How quickly does the Datatracker update for RFCs? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:17:23 -0000 Greetings. at this moment = shows that draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-06 is an active ID, but = it was published as an RFC last night (message from the RFC Editor was = dated July 13, 2011 5:59:21 PM PDT). A lag of an your seems fine, a lag = of >12 seems not fine. Is this a single glitch or a pattern? --Paul Hoffman From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 14 09:58:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1E321F8D2D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:58:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.674 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.674 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTYqdnVv60AV for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4821F8C0D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6EGwDj9084144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:58:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <4E1E9FB8.9080003@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:58:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0F552CFE-B4FF-44AA-920A-2FB93F17F215@vpnc.org> References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> <4E1E9FB8.9080003@gmx.de> To: Tools Team Discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Julian Reschke Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:58:33 -0000 On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:50 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-07-14 02:19, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> Greetings again. I would like to extend the "ietf command-line tool" = functionality to include knowing when an RFC has been obsoleted. I could = write a parser for rfc-index.xml, but I would guess at least two or = three of you have already done so. Free code would be appreciated. >=20 > If you can call an XML parser plus either an XPath or XSLT = implementation it should be dead simple... For should value of "should", yes. I am hoping to not waste time = discovering problems with either of them if others have already faced = that pain. --Paul Hoffman From ahagens@amsl.com Thu Jul 14 10:15:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A8221F8B87 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.700, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mC2ORZQoz4FK for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D721F8B86 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E540A1C381A6; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c1a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c1a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pnmuk7DMnZGH; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc2.home (pool-72-66-107-92.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.107.92]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D4CF1C38159; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Alice Hagens In-Reply-To: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:15:50 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9A7C51F9-1F76-4210-8B01-21B28E1E553B@amsl.com> References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> To: Paul Hoffman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Tools Team Discussion , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:15:57 -0000 Although it's not what you're asking about, just fyi, there exists a = Perl script rfc-what-i-mean by Joe Touch (available from = http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools/), which uses rfc-index.txt to output a = list of RFCs that are mentioned in the input file and that have been = updated or obsoleted. # output =3D RFCs you really mean in two sets: # first set: one line each, your RFC and its=20 # appropriate successor(s), including updates: # a single line "RFCS TO REPLACE:" # rfc2255 -> rfc4516 # rfc2798 -> rfc3698, rfc4517 # rfc3698 -> rfc3698, rfc4517 # a single line of "RFCS YOU MEAN:" # second set: one line each, of the sorted,=20 # unique set of RFCs you want: # rfc3698 # rfc4516 # rfc4517 Thanks, Alice RFC Production Center On Jul 13, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. I would like to extend the "ietf command-line tool" = functionality to include knowing when an RFC has been obsoleted. I could = write a parser for rfc-index.xml, but I would guess at least two or = three of you have already done so. Free code would be appreciated. >=20 > --Paul Hoffman >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 14 10:26:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3AE21F8A42 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:26:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.672 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qdf3bQaaDcW2 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4240321F8888 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6EHPotu085277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:25:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <9A7C51F9-1F76-4210-8B01-21B28E1E553B@amsl.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:25:59 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> <9A7C51F9-1F76-4210-8B01-21B28E1E553B@amsl.com> To: Alice Hagens X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Tools Team Discussion , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:26:08 -0000 On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Alice Hagens wrote: > Although it's not what you're asking about, just fyi, there exists a = Perl script rfc-what-i-mean by Joe Touch (available from = http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools/), which uses rfc-index.txt to output a = list of RFCs that are mentioned in the input file and that have been = updated or obsoleted. Thanks, but it is not what I am interested in. :-) I want Python (even = though I wrote _Perl For Dummies_), and I want to go directly from the = source database, rfc-index.xml. FWIW, I will be producing output like Joe's, but in addition be acting = on some of the results in the IETF cli tool. --Paul Hoffman From cmorgan@amsl.com Thu Jul 14 10:56:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CF121F8CF0 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.75 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.151, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iw09yS3o7tYm for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FEB21F8CEF for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC971E2128 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c1a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c1a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bF7klkYZOUTc for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [64.170.98.150] (unknown [64.170.98.150]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73B1C1C3817C for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0A174057-7B9C-433D-8373-8C9ACD756608@amsl.com> From: Cindy Morgan To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:50 -0700 References: <62F8C9C1-07EB-497B-858B-24143769E6A8@amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How quickly does the Datatracker update for RFCs? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:56:52 -0000 Hi Paul, When a new RFC is published, the Secretariat has to update the Datatracker manually, so there is always some degree of lag. In this particular case, the RFC (and nine others) was published after normal business hours yesterday, and this morning both of the people who would create the RFC record in the database and update the Datatracker accordingly have been busy with an IESG telechat. (The telechat has just ended, so I should have the Datatracker updated for all of these RFCs within the next hour or so.) Best regards, Cindy >> From: Paul Hoffman >> Date: July 14, 2011 11:17:16 AM EDT >> To: Tools Team Discussion >> Subject: [Tools-discuss] How quickly does the Datatracker update >> for RFCs? >> >> Greetings. at this >> moment shows that draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-06 is an >> active ID, but it was published as an RFC last night (message from >> the RFC Editor was dated July 13, 2011 5:59:21 PM PDT). A lag of an >> your seems fine, a lag of >12 seems not fine. Is this a single >> glitch or a pattern? >> >> --Paul Hoffman >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 14 11:01:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B86A21F8B7A for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.665 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dr-8+tHSJBL for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC25421F8B4A for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6EI1Rhu086880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <0A174057-7B9C-433D-8373-8C9ACD756608@amsl.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:01:36 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <34A61C89-2DDF-4B53-8675-1DF942DD84A4@vpnc.org> References: <62F8C9C1-07EB-497B-858B-24143769E6A8@amsl.com> <0A174057-7B9C-433D-8373-8C9ACD756608@amsl.com> To: Cindy Morgan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How quickly does the Datatracker update for RFCs? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:01:40 -0000 On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Cindy Morgan wrote: > When a new RFC is published, the Secretariat has to update the = Datatracker manually, so there is always some degree of lag. In this = particular case, the RFC (and nine others) was published after normal = business hours yesterday, and this morning both of the people who would = create the RFC record in the database and update the Datatracker = accordingly have been busy with an IESG telechat. (The telechat has = just ended, so I should have the Datatracker updated for all of these = RFCs within the next hour or so.) That all makes sense, thanks. I didn't realize that this was a truly = manual process; I thought it was "automatic but with some lag" and was = questioning the lag. You should make sure that the RFC Editor doesn't issue any RFCs when you = are all on an airplane heading to an IETF meeting! :-) --Paul Hoffman From nico@cryptonector.com Thu Jul 14 12:27:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05C821F8C11 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.658 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.681, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5cTYVj1-5LyL for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BE121F8C0F for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD7342807A for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=TNr0OIk5MBbLCZCD516QGz8F+QPx+NbanRIq6BB0zYjK ecKUNpIQrQcIUYQPw0y3bqX9UwATjRuQvLiGPnbwvnN4X1KxBmkzQAyEeiD3wTO+ 3k9nSI7MT947bZYgCGOHEKmiFrA+19WD6xW9FccDdcLJwcecygwikKiz42k5ROU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=ts+uMfFE3Xe9ZlmAdeCid77l4ac=; b=SrhLybVjRDn vv1chfT9HICJUR6DyZTCtUqxo09583nhDU8RUu8GOX6ZARH7ILUaG3+SOG6xtlzl XRBr4HyJAH0dXGvOMBBhEdOzKbEwBsEg9VH7HUAxvvEA7xdlLKjt4iGIT8T/HY5c 20YCpLprnC17nt3t4/OA2GatZzWYfCO0= Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7DFF428072 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pvh18 with SMTP id 18so737634pvh.31 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.41.165 with SMTP id g5mr3234906pbl.106.1310671653542; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.48.74 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> <9A7C51F9-1F76-4210-8B01-21B28E1E553B@amsl.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:27:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alice Hagens , Tools Team Discussion , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:27:38 -0000 On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Paul Hoffman wrot= e: > On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Alice Hagens wrote: > >> Although it's not what you're asking about, just fyi, there exists a Per= l script rfc-what-i-mean by Joe Touch (available from http://www.isi.edu/to= uch/tools/), which uses rfc-index.txt to output a list of RFCs that are men= tioned in the input file and that have been updated or obsoleted. > > Thanks, but it is not what I am interested in. :-) I want Python (even th= ough I wrote _Perl For Dummies_), and I want to go directly from the source= database, rfc-index.xml. > > FWIW, I will be producing output like Joe's, but in addition be acting on= some of the results in the IETF cli tool. from xml.dom.minidom import parse, parseString d =3D parse('rfc-index.xml') docids =3D d.getElementsByTagName("doc-id") for docid in docids: print docid.childNodes[0].data That should get you a list of RFC/BCP/FYI/STD numbers. With a bit more work you can get exactly what you're after. Nico -- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu Jul 14 14:22:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E058A11E80D4 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:22:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.125 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.526, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VNxdSJHU8C0 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CC9211E80CD for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2011 21:22:31 -0000 Received: from p508FD277.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [80.143.210.119] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 14 Jul 2011 23:22:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+FhQdtIpKFXUNk0pf2aagP0UFZFGS1gmRXn56aW8 UjJh+d4W3lWHr1 Message-ID: <4E1F5E14.8090100@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:28 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyrus Daboo References: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> <7826AA002C64ED0FC2D86A09@caldav.corp.apple.com> In-Reply-To: <7826AA002C64ED0FC2D86A09@caldav.corp.apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org ICS files X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:22:35 -0000 On 2011-07-14 15:56, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > Hi Julian, > > --On July 13, 2011 2:13:44 PM +0200 Julian Reschke > wrote: > >> trying to subscribe to one of the auto-generated calendars such as >> >> > iri+websec+hybi+yam+vcarddav+appsawg+httpbis+Tools.ics> >> >> ...when I import this into Thunderbird/Lightning it doesn't get the >> timezones right; however Google Calendar seems to be happy. >> >> Lightning Bug? Spec bug? Calendar file bug? > > The iCalendar data looked OK to me. I was able to view it in a couple of > different apps and ran it through my iCalendar parser/validator without > issues. So I would point to a Lightning bug as the cause. Thanks. Guess I'll try my luck with a bug report then... Best regards, Julian From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Thu Jul 14 18:58:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461F721F8733 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:58:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.359 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_35=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GU7L7xzWgWAD for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406A121F873D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6F1wCHY002758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:58:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:58:21 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <72CC36CE-0520-44D1-A4EA-677179317DDA@vpnc.org> <9A7C51F9-1F76-4210-8B01-21B28E1E553B@amsl.com> To: Tools Team Discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Looking for a Python-based parser for rfc-index.xml X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:58:28 -0000 I ended up just powering through it myself, with a dollop of help from = Dive Into Python 3. In case this is of use to folks: from xml.etree import ElementTree as ElTree . . . RFCZerosPat =3D re.compile(r'^0+(.*)') . . . TagBase =3D "{http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index}" try: ParsedRFCDB =3D ElTree.parse("rfc-index.xml") except: exit("Weird: could not find '" + "rfc-index.xml" + "' when = building the status index. Exiting.") TreeRoot =3D ParsedRFCDB.getroot() RFCStatus =3D {} def StripLeadingZeros(InStr): return(sub(RFCZerosPat, "\\1", InStr)) for ThisTopNode in TreeRoot: if ThisTopNode.tag =3D=3D TagBase + "rfc-entry": ThisRFCNum =3D = StripLeadingZeros(ThisTopNode.find(TagBase + = "doc-id").text.replace("RFC", "")) RFCStatus[ThisRFCNum] =3D {} for ThisLookedFor in ("obsoletes", "obsoleted-by", = "updates", "updated-by"): if ThisTopNode.findall(TagBase + ThisLookedFor): RFCStatus[ThisRFCNum][ThisLookedFor] =3D = [] for ThisFoundItem in = ThisTopNode.findall(TagBase + ThisLookedFor): = RFCStatus[ThisRFCNum][ThisLookedFor].append(StripLeadingZeros(ThisFoundIte= m.find(TagBase + "doc-id").text.replace("RFC", ""))) if ThisTopNode.findall(TagBase + "draft"): RFCStatus[ThisRFCNum]["draft"] =3D = ThisTopNode.find(TagBase + "draft").text if ThisTopNode.findall(TagBase + "errata-url"): RFCStatus[ThisRFCNum]["errata"] =3D True I then pickle RFCStatus for later use because thawing it is much, much = faster than parsing the XML. (List comprehensions might shorten the code = a bit, but I don't mind verbosity.) --Paul Hoffman= From evnikita2@gmail.com Thu Jul 14 21:07:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A747821F8653 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.497 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mnj2fOxeWciq for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3726C21F865D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so2477756fxe.27 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4HjweiFu5PJm7qgwa6B1yVnfifmv/mLcyS9KKrTcX20=; b=MwcLKoTX4h+2CSEGKyD+TFjs/73XruPnvp/NYf2/IuZQnRCOHpMJ+aKl10/dHQ0m0V jbW9J0H4UsBmlBCfCMWm2gfKON5krScQNQbZ8f0sJKmVW74l4BEnTTQmpsUPOz7fNzRe Ane4S9jm5FXDrSVthbVBCA7YEnUSfC9K5zFuQ= Received: by 10.223.16.210 with SMTP id p18mr25124faa.71.1310702826278; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm517335faa.39.2011.07.14.21.07.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E1FBD15.6060102@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:07:49 +0300 From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker I-D Submit overlooks cut-off date X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:07:11 -0000 Hello, Recently I've received the I-D Announce digest saying that several drafts were uploaded after announced cut-off date - 11 July - see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/maillist.html. I personally tried to upload a draft using that tool, and my attempt was successful. So what's this? Cut-off deadline in context of such situation really makes little sense. Mykyta Yevstifeyev From julian.reschke@gmx.de Fri Jul 15 03:30:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD66621F853B for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:30:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.417 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.417 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.818, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6X4sjvb6lqrb for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D479421F8537 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2011 10:30:54 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 15 Jul 2011 12:30:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/lDlUF1VrlnkbnZiLfQJ9IB8adu2cmMrh44Kg49e 9G9f4ZbhvpHW6f Message-ID: <4E2016D6.8030409@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:30:46 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cyrus Daboo References: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> <7826AA002C64ED0FC2D86A09@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4E1F5E14.8090100@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E1F5E14.8090100@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org ICS files X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:30:56 -0000 On 2011-07-14 23:22, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-07-14 15:56, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >> Hi Julian, >> >> --On July 13, 2011 2:13:44 PM +0200 Julian Reschke >> wrote: >> >>> trying to subscribe to one of the auto-generated calendars such as >>> >>> >> iri+websec+hybi+yam+vcarddav+appsawg+httpbis+Tools.ics> >>> >>> ...when I import this into Thunderbird/Lightning it doesn't get the >>> timezones right; however Google Calendar seems to be happy. >>> >>> Lightning Bug? Spec bug? Calendar file bug? >> >> The iCalendar data looked OK to me. I was able to view it in a couple of >> different apps and ran it through my iCalendar parser/validator without >> issues. So I would point to a Lightning bug as the cause. > > Thanks. Guess I'll try my luck with a bug report then... > ... In the meantime, the problem has disappeared over here. Dunno what changed or whether I was just confused... From henrik@levkowetz.com Fri Jul 15 05:45:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D93221F874E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.126 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zno6VATsdd8e for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D87221F874C for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 90-230-136-60-no45.tbcn.telia.com ([90.230.136.60]:62269 helo=vigonier.lan) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1Qhhl4-0007Uw-V0; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:44:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E203635.5070404@levkowetz.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:44:37 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lou Berger References: <4E1F1FB7.20400@labn.net> In-Reply-To: <4E1F1FB7.20400@labn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.230.136.60 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: lberger@labn.net, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf agenda update issue? (Fwd: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda) X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:45:00 -0000 Hi Lou, On 2011-07-14 18:56 Lou Berger said the following: > Any thoughts on why caches aren't recognizing that agenda pages are > updated? (I haven't explored my guess...) I think it was a full disk. Should be OK, now, but let me know if you see anything more amiss. Best regards, Henrik > Thanks, > > Lou > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda > Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:51:10 -0700 > From: Lou Berger > To: Giovanni Martinelli > CC: Thomas Nadeau, CCAMP > > I had the same issue until my squid cache decided it was time to refresh > the page. My guess is that the ietf site is not doing the right thing > to the http headers when the agenda page is updated. > > Lou > > On 7/14/2011 7:40 AM, Giovanni Martinelli wrote: >> >> >> On 7/14/11 4:22 PM, Thomas Nadeau wrote: >>> >>> No idea. Still showing up as this after restarting. >> exactly the same issue here... >> >> ~G >> >>> Anyways, ignore my situation if you all can see the agenda! 8) >>> >>> --Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Sidd Aanand wrote: >>> >>>> I see the agenda. You may want to clear your browser's cache. >>>> >>>> Sidd >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau >>>> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:19 PM >>>> To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) >>>> Cc: CCAMP >>>> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you sure? Or is the agenda empty? This is what I get when I go to that link: >>>> >>>> IETF-81 ccamp agenda >>>> Sorry, no agenda available as of today. Either no meeting was held, or the document has not yet been submitted. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:47 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) wrote: >>>> >>>>> CCAMP, >>>>> >>>>> The draft agenda is available: >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/agenda >>>>> >>>>> Let us know if we missed anyone- >>>>> Deborah and Lou >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>>> >>>> >>>> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CCAMP mailing list >>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Fri Jul 15 07:32:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639F421F8695 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:32:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.653 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j6CEHBcrEGIt for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE66521F8451 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6FEVuAo033986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:31:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <4E1FBD15.6060102@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:32:05 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <368952C2-C54D-4474-A40F-851137A58ACA@vpnc.org> References: <4E1FBD15.6060102@gmail.com> To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Datatracker I-D Submit overlooks cut-off date X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:32:14 -0000 On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Recently I've received the I-D Announce digest saying that several = drafts were uploaded after announced cut-off date - 11 July - see = http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/maillist.html. = I personally tried to upload a draft using that tool, and my attempt = was successful. So what's this? Cut-off deadline in context of such = situation really makes little sense. Drafts can be submitted after the cutoff date if the sponsoring AD = approves of the late submission. --Paul Hoffman From fielding@gbiv.com Sun Jul 24 16:31:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F3721F84F2 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.512 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.913, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKJ1UiE-LQgz for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452C421F84F1 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0836B007B for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to: mime-version; q=dns; s=gbiv.com; b=Cvt6UoF6lJG1bTRDNi/HiVmAh9JYo HsC07+WaUZw0eOAPi7RMHRe6J8+Lfat/AD2m+gqATn6hCJBPpzqBMWAbg10lXtJU UTsskaxA4b/ujaFQkVGx5uxcD/dynjwJYjWllX1jrEp5eBJ5M3Xk5aplblocaYrF APY/0aUHZNiBms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; s=gbiv.com; bh=sWlDs5j8ppaO5N026zfMM3SyyUM=; b=kM5lKwq6Xvi+26eP+eL84BKqch4uJf/BloLNDYJ4RlElSrXw7E+AP3WZpZnZm 4ArYxVH0qHy4HT42cOxyllNei8eK2SCiPVVBDFXNXhC49Sc8MlnNjUm/u36TjyfD USn2LID6BR0H1OS1TCgLbSmAX6ass/bV4txYRGeFst4i9g= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a72.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 014526B0014 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:26 -0700 (PDT) From: "Roy T. Fielding" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:31:26 -0700 Message-Id: <5E5A79AB-03CD-47ED-AC06-256D0BDB85FC@gbiv.com> To: Tools Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] SSL negotiation errors on svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:31:27 -0000 Does anyone have a solution to the problem described in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg66647.html I am using OS X 10.6.8 and svn 1.6.16 and OpenSSL 0.9.8r % svn up svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis': SSL = negotiation failed: SSL error code -1/1/336032856 = (https://svn.tools.ietf.org) It has been failing that way for over a month now. What changed? ....Roy= From mnot@mnot.net Mon Jul 25 09:11:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED5211E8118 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKUjkhcrgFDn for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECDA21F8C90 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-1790.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [130.129.23.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFA8222E256; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mark Nottingham In-Reply-To: <5E5A79AB-03CD-47ED-AC06-256D0BDB85FC@gbiv.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:43:32 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7A274F6D-B72A-4A43-998F-3166FC194AF0@mnot.net> References: <5E5A79AB-03CD-47ED-AC06-256D0BDB85FC@gbiv.com> To: Roy T. Fielding X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Tools Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] SSL negotiation errors on svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:11:54 -0000 Hmm, this suggests a fix: = http://wiki.networksecuritytoolkit.org/nstwiki/index.php/HowTo_Configure_A= pache_SSL_For_davfs,_subversion,_etc. On 24/07/2011, at 7:31 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Does anyone have a solution to the problem described in >=20 > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg66647.html >=20 > I am using OS X 10.6.8 and svn 1.6.16 and OpenSSL 0.9.8r >=20 > % svn up > svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis': SSL = negotiation failed: SSL error code -1/1/336032856 = (https://svn.tools.ietf.org) >=20 > It has been failing that way for over a month now. What changed? >=20 > ....Roy > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ From cyrus@daboo.name Thu Jul 14 06:56:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F2721F881C for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.232 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.367, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZiO6uuVwBFc for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A8421F8788 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297571536A72; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:56:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4rac6KlusSX; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:56:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.45.162.46]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FD691536A67; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:56:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:56:27 -0400 From: Cyrus Daboo To: Julian Reschke , IETF TOOLS discussion Message-ID: <7826AA002C64ED0FC2D86A09@caldav.corp.apple.com> In-Reply-To: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> References: <4E1D8BF8.2000606@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=706 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:33:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org ICS files X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:56:38 -0000 Hi Julian, --On July 13, 2011 2:13:44 PM +0200 Julian Reschke wrote: > trying to subscribe to one of the auto-generated calendars such as > > iri+websec+hybi+yam+vcarddav+appsawg+httpbis+Tools.ics> > > ...when I import this into Thunderbird/Lightning it doesn't get the > timezones right; however Google Calendar seems to be happy. > > Lightning Bug? Spec bug? Calendar file bug? The iCalendar data looked OK to me. I was able to view it in a couple of different apps and ran it through my iCalendar parser/validator without issues. So I would point to a Lightning bug as the cause. -- Cyrus Daboo From lberger@labn.net Thu Jul 14 10:17:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F8221F8D7F for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQbJck1YGgo6 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E98E721F8D7D for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29411 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jul 2011 17:17:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 2011 17:17:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=labn.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=XczTFcwKUgWurR3leDoWEULeIE6wVGxfqzs2ek7jEWxw/GJi1V5kPmFr6SE2Qb57/OWp6ohLbILWgRk6O4BfTA7qc+9b4t+YRjcJLkkgOMJoJWYIo/dNlQvPKhB0UiyQ; Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhPD8-0003TN-Ps; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:56:27 -0600 Message-ID: <4E1F1FB7.20400@labn.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:56:23 -0700 From: Lou Berger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net} X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:33:06 -0700 Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf agenda update issue? (Fwd: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda) X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:17:15 -0000 Any thoughts on why caches aren't recognizing that agenda pages are updated? (I haven't explored my guess...) Thanks, Lou -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:51:10 -0700 From: Lou Berger To: Giovanni Martinelli CC: Thomas Nadeau , CCAMP I had the same issue until my squid cache decided it was time to refresh the page. My guess is that the ietf site is not doing the right thing to the http headers when the agenda page is updated. Lou On 7/14/2011 7:40 AM, Giovanni Martinelli wrote: > > > On 7/14/11 4:22 PM, Thomas Nadeau wrote: >> >> No idea. Still showing up as this after restarting. > exactly the same issue here... > > ~G > >> Anyways, ignore my situation if you all can see the agenda! 8) >> >> --Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Sidd Aanand wrote: >> >>> I see the agenda. You may want to clear your browser's cache. >>> >>> Sidd >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau >>> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:19 PM >>> To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) >>> Cc: CCAMP >>> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IETF81-CCAMP Draft Agenda >>> >>> >>> Are you sure? Or is the agenda empty? This is what I get when I go to that link: >>> >>> IETF-81 ccamp agenda >>> Sorry, no agenda available as of today. Either no meeting was held, or the document has not yet been submitted. >>> >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:47 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) wrote: >>> >>>> CCAMP, >>>> >>>> The draft agenda is available: >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/agenda >>>> >>>> Let us know if we missed anyone- >>>> Deborah and Lou >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CCAMP mailing list >>>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CCAMP mailing list >>> CCAMP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >>> >>> >>> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CCAMP mailing list >> CCAMP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp From pusateri@bangj.com Mon Jul 25 16:09:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39E921F86BB for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqAdTLAhkpnZ for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jj.bangj.com (jj.bangj.com [198.86.87.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A5821F86AB for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.21.110] (cpe-024-211-047-123.sc.res.rr.com [24.211.47.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E86913 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:09:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Pusateri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:09:20 -0400 Message-Id: To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Tools-discuss] Agenda / iCal questions X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:09:23 -0000 I noticed that the agenda page online at = http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/ has an agenda for v6ops on Tuesday = morning and so does the Agenda RSS feed on the tools site = feed://tools.ietf.org/agenda/atom. But the iCal file at http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/agenda_81.ics does = not. The feed shows the agenda for v6ops was updated at 3:06 pm and the = iCal file was updated at 6:20 pm but it still doesn't contain the v6ops = agenda in the description field. Does this have anything to do with the format of the agenda? If the = agenda is in HTML, does it not get included in the iCal file? Or are = there other delays in getting the agenda into the .ics file? Thanks, Tom= From mnot@mnot.net Tue Jul 26 02:48:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3E621F8B9F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tBzRbeONs9xb for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C725B21F8B6B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.0.33] (unknown [173.176.6.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2982922E1EB; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mark Nottingham In-Reply-To: <7A274F6D-B72A-4A43-998F-3166FC194AF0@mnot.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:47:51 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79734702-01DF-4160-AA4A-6EDF8A17E86E@mnot.net> References: <5E5A79AB-03CD-47ED-AC06-256D0BDB85FC@gbiv.com> <7A274F6D-B72A-4A43-998F-3166FC194AF0@mnot.net> To: Tools discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Roy Fielding Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] SSL negotiation errors on svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:48:00 -0000 FWIW -- the workaround is to change your repository URL to 'http'. I've = confirmed that my client (OSX svn) does use Digest auth. Cheers, On 25/07/2011, at 10:43 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hmm, this suggests a fix: > = http://wiki.networksecuritytoolkit.org/nstwiki/index.php/HowTo_Configure_A= pache_SSL_For_davfs,_subversion,_etc. >=20 >=20 > On 24/07/2011, at 7:31 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >=20 >> Does anyone have a solution to the problem described in >>=20 >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg66647.html >>=20 >> I am using OS X 10.6.8 and svn 1.6.16 and OpenSSL 0.9.8r >>=20 >> % svn up >> svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis': SSL = negotiation failed: SSL error code -1/1/336032856 = (https://svn.tools.ietf.org) >>=20 >> It has been failing that way for over a month now. What changed? >>=20 >> ....Roy >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ From fred@cisco.com Wed Jul 27 06:30:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B50921F8531 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.504, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMpiapeql+TO for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D18F21F8515 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:30:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=899; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311773427; x=1312983027; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=HYA56L3/WkmEa5FnRJjK3i355izqum3vO/ZQ6up50MA=; b=XguWOmMWZjZAbccO/c+jTxxeypA+G6FZidJXuIoi2LoTCNoI3XCissiz MEwUZX/zMW6rmbqGSva8DOV5KVZ39hEehTYqHqZtn4D2m8/rRI84bXuNr WyB4wutV+LjVrazx0sulZFJwbimFSPxLBqk2I37AvdoVIDVe6SJOZ2DLf 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwEADwSME6rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABQAStAgQhYPqcYd6oBgSOeXIVhXwSSdYUHi3c X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,276,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="6964047" Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2011 13:30:27 +0000 Received: from dhcp-57cd.meeting.ietf.org (sjc-vpn7-82.cisco.com [10.21.144.82]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6RDUPIx008818 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:30:26 GMT Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dhcp-57cd.meeting.ietf.org (PGP Universal service); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:30:26 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by dhcp-57cd.meeting.ietf.org on Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:30:26 -0400 From: Fred Baker Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:30:17 -0400 Message-Id: <643F6962-16EB-4470-9EC3-AB3E0A28D11B@cisco.com> To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Tools-discuss] Regarding individual submissions to a working group X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:30:28 -0000 Take http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/ as an example. I note that the = internet drafts considered are working group (draft-ietf--*) drafts. = In most working groups, we also have individual submissions to the wg = (draft---*), which are contributions at an earlier stage but = of interest to the working group. These are pointed to by the = datatracker page for the WG, but in a very different place that I don't = find very convenient. It would be nice, from my perspective, if the = tools page could list=20 outdated individual submissions=20 draft---* but older than the previous IETF meeting = date current individual submissions draft---* and newer than the previous IETF meeting = date working group drafts draft-ietf--* and not in the IESG (replaces current "active = drafts") and then other statuses as they currently exist