From nobody Thu Jul 3 13:34:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16921A045D for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:34:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrubD03VasAw for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 482C81A035E for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:34:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s63KYZmT002014 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54891749.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.23.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83BBB3B7; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Carsten Bormann Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:34:33 +0200 X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 426112473.636117-ff0a7bc0313b6de176cafcda13ddb9a2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <85A91E50-ADEA-46F1-A726-BA536429AD5A@tzi.org> References: To: Tools Team Discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/YRlmy3VUN1eNlzgS_udebRLcfWA Subject: [Tools-discuss] Confusing replaced-by information X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 20:34:45 -0000 I=92m afraid I destroyed the evidence here, but before I sent the below = request and it was acted on, tools,ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 showed draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap in the list of versions, but if you = clicked on the diff2 link there you got an error message from the = rfcdiff tool (apparently about a missing url1). So there was some = knowledge in tools that this was kind of a bit like a replaced-by, but = the knowledge wasn=92t consistently acted upon (and, e.g., it wasn=92t = visible in the WG page). The reason I note this is 1) The fact that draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap was in the list of versions = almost convinced me not to send the below request; and 2) The bad diff2 link certainly qualifies as a bug. I=92m not arguing that guessed replaced-by information shouldn=92t be = shown, just that it should be qualified as such (and that links offered = should not lead to an error message). Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten Begin forwarded message: > From: "Cindy Morgan via RT" > Subject: [www.ietf.org/rt #66625] draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00.txt replaces = draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03 > Date: 3 Jul 2014 22:02:41 +0200 > To: cabo@tzi.org > Reply-To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org >=20 > Hi Carsten, >=20 > The replaced-by information has been added to the datatracker, as = requested. >=20 > The way this works is, replaced-by information has to be added to the > datatracker manually. The tools.ietf.org sites are running a script = that will > try to guess at replacement relationships based on the draft = names--that is why > you were seeing different information there. Please note that = tools.ietf.org is > separate from the datatracker and not under Secretariat control--for = issues > there, please contact webmaster@tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Best regards, > Cindy >=20 > On Thu Jul 03 12:21:44 2014, cabo@tzi.org wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> please take note that >>=20 >> draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 >> replaces >> draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03 >>=20 >> (I=92m a bit confused that tools.ietf.org already seems to indicate = that >> when looking at >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 >> but neither the datatracker nor the tools WG page seem to know that.) >>=20 >> Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten >>=20 >=20 >=20 From nobody Thu Jul 3 14:34:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A05D1B2946 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qzl7DvLpzn9Y for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052311B29C8 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55033 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X2odn-0007ZN-FI; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:34:03 -0700 Message-ID: <53B5CC49.1030204@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 23:34:01 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carsten Bormann , Tools Team Discussion References: <85A91E50-ADEA-46F1-A726-BA536429AD5A@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <85A91E50-ADEA-46F1-A726-BA536429AD5A@tzi.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6FRXCqb7qUqoklpRDB7IcxARGQcJngqHB" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: cabo@tzi.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/u8ndZLA9RzxgktyPp8RicAAYrMU Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Confusing replaced-by information X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:34:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6FRXCqb7qUqoklpRDB7IcxARGQcJngqHB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, Please don't use the tools discussion list for bug reports. It's meant to be a discussion list, and it's much more likely that I see bug reports= directly and can act on them in a timely manner if you send them to eithe= r henrik@levkowetz.com=20 or webmaster@tools.ietf.org or use the instructions for bug reporting which is in the email footer of this list. I'll reply to the bug report itself off-list. Regards, Henrik On 2014-07-03 22:34 Carsten Bormann said the following: > I=92m afraid I destroyed the evidence here, but before I sent the below= request and it was acted on, >=20 > tools,ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 >=20 > showed draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap in the list of versions, but if you cli= cked on the diff2 link there you got an error message from the rfcdiff to= ol (apparently about a missing url1). So there was some knowledge in too= ls that this was kind of a bit like a replaced-by, but the knowledge wasn= =92t consistently acted upon (and, e.g., it wasn=92t visible in the WG pa= ge). >=20 > The reason I note this is >=20 > 1) The fact that draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap was in the list of versions a= lmost convinced me not to send the below request; and >=20 > 2) The bad diff2 link certainly qualifies as a bug. >=20 > I=92m not arguing that guessed replaced-by information shouldn=92t be s= hown, just that it should be qualified as such (and that links offered sh= ould not lead to an error message). >=20 > Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten >=20 >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 >> From: "Cindy Morgan via RT" >> Subject: [www.ietf.org/rt #66625] draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00.txt replaces= draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03 >> Date: 3 Jul 2014 22:02:41 +0200 >> To: cabo@tzi.org >> Reply-To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org >>=20 >> Hi Carsten, >>=20 >> The replaced-by information has been added to the datatracker, as requ= ested. >>=20 >> The way this works is, replaced-by information has to be added to the >> datatracker manually. The tools.ietf.org sites are running a script th= at will >> try to guess at replacement relationships based on the draft names--th= at is why >> you were seeing different information there. Please note that tools.ie= tf.org is >> separate from the datatracker and not under Secretariat control--for i= ssues >> there, please contact webmaster@tools.ietf.org. >>=20 >> Best regards, >> Cindy >>=20 >> On Thu Jul 03 12:21:44 2014, cabo@tzi.org wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> please take note that >>>=20 >>> draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 >>> replaces >>> draft-kovatsch-lwig-coap-03 >>>=20 >>> (I=92m a bit confused that tools.ietf.org already seems to indicate t= hat >>> when looking at >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-coap-00 >>> but neither the datatracker nor the tools WG page seem to know that.)= >>>=20 >>> Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 --6FRXCqb7qUqoklpRDB7IcxARGQcJngqHB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTtcxJAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcajjIQAJVpgKC0kh/VdQYITwjHFXsS CbtpWxngOzaG+s2Mgx0CtslZuyMyJ2HSG/t2i5/MYuYBlo5VMvzpe4k0NZllKWCT v7luQMSdJBzW+2mImAnu6L6DMy/jQG08rkorkuxR+RiLhAATh3A7ZPO+eQVLsYPj Muz69jdJqwRAV8msptOOYFadJ6ysSFAsPNdHRKMzFQdzZM7x/PYobI6VimlTFYjA aNDaZj55aap5I/xKflGVzmPX0L82zpTe7crVCbQjJVycqIwvl2rm8ttBCiekkU44 pmWC/o/+3+65lLreVHSyd+kWWU2W5KzApPEsEbuOEkFsDBDd7o89QVL+ARwp0IIA CL5nhsmcjaTx11cNce3wjtfkQJYm+luAGze76fUuyQx9cid2qT7BNsPLJ6vLehWs Jx9R5iZKF0TramMyU++grmyTltYOzoVL8y5pcXMttR3cc6oe0xMnFtC8iBKeo49z /PqY6yCmv8vWlXqrE2AENAzBZfK/uGCYPRMJUv9BIqJ36v+yLsj+Elyv/1xkNMds ZrvErGQfnIWfnlBCJUilfc3XI3AUGJrRVAaL2E7eCQX6O4RD41p4uscz6GimBJcG 7cztIFQgIQ/lDcRhCODnUkUHWvvO7UclO225z4Z/Huq04cFmCgbgS7dw+vPuMrF0 4plhFugEPxlt855s+q8d =lrta -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6FRXCqb7qUqoklpRDB7IcxARGQcJngqHB-- From nobody Mon Jul 7 13:49:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9F31B28D2 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:49:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sn_iWnsAKMAP for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C841B28C4 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E88F9F984; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7AD21FE00; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:49:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Henrik Levkowetz , Elwyn Davies In-Reply-To: <538C619D.2000905@levkowetz.com> References: <1401581323.29419.3250.camel@mightyatom> <538C619D.2000905@levkowetz.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:49:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87bnt0x5bp.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/wtv9pDUOutixPFEUY8ab10_siFY Cc: IETF tools discussion Subject: [Tools-discuss] https for xml2rfc.ietf.org [was: Re: Something odd going on with DNS for xml.resource.org] X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:49:30 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 2014-06-02 07:35:57 -0400, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Not sure why this would be, but I'd recommend you to start using xml2rfc.= ietf.org > for the online xml2rfc service -- we're headed that way. The domain xml2rfc.ietf.org doesn't work properly under https, even if i ignore the certificate mismatch: 8 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$ wget https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bi= bxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml =2D-2014-07-07 16:43:09-- https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/refer= ence.RFC.2119.xml Resolving xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)... 64.170.98.42, 2001:1890:12= 3a::1:2a Connecting to xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)|64.170.98.42|:443... conn= ected. GnuTLS: A TLS warning alert has been received. GnuTLS: received alert [112]: The server name sent was not recognized The certificate's owner does not match hostname =E2=80=98xml2rfc.ietf.org= =E2=80=99 5 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$ wget --no-check-certificate https://xml2rf= c.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml =2D-2014-07-07 16:43:14-- https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/refer= ence.RFC.2119.xml Resolving xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)... 64.170.98.42, 2001:1890:12= 3a::1:2a Connecting to xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)|64.170.98.42|:443... conn= ected. GnuTLS: A TLS warning alert has been received. GnuTLS: received alert [112]: The server name sent was not recognized The certificate's owner does not match hostname =E2=80=98xml2rfc.ietf.org= =E2=80=99 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2014-07-07 16:43:15 ERROR 404: Not Found. 8 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$=20 Given that xml2rfc uses this domain to fetch critical data over the network, it seems like we should get this working with https. i note that the cert actually matches if i use the domain name xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org, but the web server still doesn't provide the data under https (it only provides the data via http). xml2rfc fetches this data over the network and uses it directly, which creates a fairly large attack surface for the tool. Using cleartext http instead of https expands the attack surface for xml2rfc to the entire network path :/ can we use https for this? I'd be fine with the slightly longer hostname xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org if it meant we got to use https. --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTuwfLXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQjk2OTEyODdBN0FEREUzNzU3RDkxMUVB NTI0MDFCMTFCRkRGQTVDAAoJEKUkAbEb/fpcruoP/jhYdF19svC35Wldf9dPu7im EUKnKTl5Vtq47f79lJMMUzeldPTa4oACJSCFsF0l8eaXmaaDqQENts3NRgKViRMP JEgev5kNnZvrGlClCv2IgViJv9E/YMmno0jwgEHO1QkwpSxPAunYMTZKciiJKCSS j/k+Zrjeg4rWHYznjVyfIftvRwH2tdhEbySGuztegNVYtnQ47r++NxCSMD319kqj YXETRR1kEnU97tMMiz0gRd3ikmyEn/kfkkA4RtNvsvcjW+Xnzz1V2joF1Qd4a5UN JC5UGs7wsYwCLGlMeMkCuqmacMTI+lnA3eutiXXpgPZvY4S8KD9NpEJfibSvyULM TLiYJLXqzMQzPrr+u4/AhyfVslmI7WFYp92Qlqh0MPt5RSUm4PVAmQl4XJMqev6X Wj8wIfBXKbqAp99llRPM/drO/O8uAeTOymckYSYOJ8whF1kJqN9UIfko+ygrk1u+ +jpZQRLKLe/6BSvJxbbgi8Za9Eqi1y4DCN9sozfIWCjcZ9a2vStOVfoOuq6Hecbc cX3y75oRWOf3kG3+C1tZRZRWR7Ys6dXjd309doSjG0lwuwlCJKJIc0IBWkSGwDbe nHQ412DEPSrX4uyMmg4hM9dL3a1npL2irTEA2GYXqT7834LLXqnlLgvpVgy7TXaK axKIC6ycfxLPpmQWRiWC =N5vL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Mon Jul 7 13:54:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A154F1B28E9 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:54:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwMlJQ9XRRMW for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:54:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46931B28B4 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40362 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X4FvD-0006gO-O8; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:54:00 -0700 Message-ID: <53BB08E4.5010100@levkowetz.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 22:53:56 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Elwyn Davies References: <1401581323.29419.3250.camel@mightyatom> <538C619D.2000905@levkowetz.com> <87bnt0x5bp.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> In-Reply-To: <87bnt0x5bp.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xcD5hRhmVFU8AX5wFuOEktO6lppjmHRW0" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: dkg@fifthhorseman.net, elwynd@dial.pipex.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/daMic2J_D7574fdElgtKY82Zbak Cc: IETF tools discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] https for xml2rfc.ietf.org [was: Re: Something odd going on with DNS for xml.resource.org] X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:54:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xcD5hRhmVFU8AX5wFuOEktO6lppjmHRW0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, On 2014-07-07 22:49 Daniel Kahn Gillmor said the following: > On Mon 2014-06-02 07:35:57 -0400, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> Not sure why this would be, but I'd recommend you to start using xml2r= fc.ietf.org >> for the online xml2rfc service -- we're headed that way. >=20 > The domain xml2rfc.ietf.org doesn't work properly under https, even if > i ignore the certificate mismatch: Yes, I know. No disagreement at all. I'm simply a bit overwhelmed with things that need to be taken care of. I'll get there. Best regards, Henrik > 8 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$ wget https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rf= c/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml > --2014-07-07 16:43:09-- https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/ref= erence.RFC.2119.xml > Resolving xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)... 64.170.98.42, 2001:189= 0:123a::1:2a > Connecting to xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)|64.170.98.42|:443... = connected. > GnuTLS: A TLS warning alert has been received. > GnuTLS: received alert [112]: The server name sent was not recognized > The certificate's owner does not match hostname =E2=80=98xml2rfc.ietf.o= rg=E2=80=99 > 5 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$ wget --no-check-certificate https://xm= l2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml > --2014-07-07 16:43:14-- https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/ref= erence.RFC.2119.xml > Resolving xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)... 64.170.98.42, 2001:189= 0:123a::1:2a > Connecting to xml2rfc.ietf.org (xml2rfc.ietf.org)|64.170.98.42|:443... = connected. > GnuTLS: A TLS warning alert has been received. > GnuTLS: received alert [112]: The server name sent was not recognized > The certificate's owner does not match hostname =E2=80=98xml2rfc.ietf.o= rg=E2=80=99 > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2014-07-07 16:43:15 ERROR 404: Not Found. >=20 > 8 dkg@alice:/tmp/cdtemp.aQm9lJ$=20 >=20 >=20 > Given that xml2rfc uses this domain to fetch critical data over the > network, it seems like we should get this working with https. >=20 > i note that the cert actually matches if i use the domain name > xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org, but the web server still doesn't provide the > data under https (it only provides the data via http). >=20 > xml2rfc fetches this data over the network and uses it directly, which > creates a fairly large attack surface for the tool. Using cleartext > http instead of https expands the attack surface for xml2rfc to the > entire network path :/ >=20 > can we use https for this? I'd be fine with the slightly longer > hostname xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org if it meant we got to use https. >=20 > --dkg >=20 --xcD5hRhmVFU8AX5wFuOEktO6lppjmHRW0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTuwjkAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaKfAQAMkqb6yqNoxf34CkTuoA9/5S wCX3tEAz6Ru68957h7f0DTeT0UpBbLeWpZaokinyRWPcz/Vbf0BxKT3juBB/5wtO 8zeB5TYCu4lwxqWx/4dqa3m8/N82O1MZWfsZCkAB1lLUNE+sYBXZZmqiKKeGCoDL zp6hz5yWQu7zYnOMx5NP7x1ZVCJTNLTC+iQuNGfxsccCV6XlRvB/pfqQv9wTZQ0Y AGm6dKtGzHcu02das/7O8d6QxLVdBU7h/mzy6Rec4qH+z7SuJf0lSaBRL5j8Hpsn U8mMFUV6B9v6NYz65I/bKNT3e1JMAHEa1Mx/mX0bqjqG5Z614QjU9IcGopDX1LqV sBqoWQMke6tXfUXjFEcUhSyGRY6Ej3LkVRKfPBZi3h/CiB27N6GCYmbJQY9AAj68 yaGLV5ItOr/+t7FohxxexthQzSTc1uOvQlSDb2KeulLWpV2eo+eqP1kiMM+Ev+lC MMa8t2SF8SexAvV5rciX/LdoB6NZ6YeShK08x0mXlrElS1Mf8XswWVoVC8pImGhp TCeRkiX9qfSbGW1wFGlHa9LeqzZl9L8QGvRr1MxAU0v6+XjOqlT8v5E2lxoa1PAj BUCVrAy+kFTvExj9HlzhNJ0bMUE31+Jf11H4kznWrI/XJHKUk9DAtbR1ECrFTzi/ KCURT+kx3862mo6+x94c =ezIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xcD5hRhmVFU8AX5wFuOEktO6lppjmHRW0-- From nobody Mon Jul 7 14:15:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE7C1B28E1 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:15:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smWsIT5tZH04 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D111B28B5 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PYkj1o0030ldTLk5FZFonA; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:15:48 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PZFn1o00V1KKtkw01ZFohE; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:15:48 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s67LFlqe000743; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:15:47 -0400 Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s67LFkje000742; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:15:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:15:46 -0400 Message-Id: <201407072115.s67LFkje000742@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor In-reply-to: <87bnt0x5bp.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> (dkg@fifthhorseman.net) References: <1401581323.29419.3250.camel@mightyatom> <538C619D.2000905@levkowetz.com> <87bnt0x5bp.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1404767748; bh=5jqUDnCBR/kNhWZm4NWhnp2y3iISeRzNOtbKCVvMwSg=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:Message-Id:From:To: Subject; b=kkgjYxOS9xjq3wsQWlE9NMG8YSAjt59XiBdhzoobrm+wgMpQBscvE+nTckKvZMCBo qnd+/BIzd5IRoHJSycrmv2hEL03VLX5SAuA7ssW764ciZZXtCcynbjtVEyvQhc6TZd h/lEb1vLw1K2e8r7EV220mKOu3d+B7lAGCLNkB5BFoMaK+2w0tEpTDStvSuS/hH4oF OTce6PF5Qv89yHRpvY3aJ1qaf4hAk+Rwyq0Hy50qpFZbH2h1gECRV43CRuPz6+v+YN MqDv7128RNVtMmbLSwruJUQWUntmrUTlrlYE7gv+kKS4z07cUI3RlQjAkQPacLHB/C PxjkbXN/l7FxQ== Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/NkSU7zwh8mbVsylArgFo4hF6EP0 Cc: elwynd@dial.pipex.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] https for xml2rfc.ietf.org [was: Re: Something odd going on with DNS for xml.resource.org] X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:15:50 -0000 > From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor > The domain xml2rfc.ietf.org doesn't work properly under https, even if > i ignore the certificate mismatch: More exactly, the server presents a certificate with "Common name: *.tools.ietf.org", which of course, doesn't match xml2rfc.ietf.org. You can see this with http://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=xml2rfc.ietf.org Dale From nobody Tue Jul 15 02:51:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC9E1B2837 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:51:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVL4IeB2BfQZ for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E12DA1B27E8 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 02:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=432; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405417876; x=1406627476; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=3XQSIz4dUq7rP9kn57e0gQutnNND9nNuOPA3vRu5jy4=; b=ltkiKAclddTyvZBd3OTdw6LxrzgwV/9YOKjJpxQQpW48YCp9WOofGZch ECsaoq213Q70q2kJfD00INqgDlOvT7u8QROvxacqq5koI13Y6rGJuwd7n qEWCudcR/RLndXRDo5LRFX4LrOrnw5k+gqx9W7Ba4O3g2ylZt0fNz7rUr I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQMAKP4xFOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABZg2BYwWSHQYEfdYRCQAE8FhgDAgECAT8MDQEHAQGIPg3JLBePS4RKAQSbFoFKhUiNEINGOy8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,664,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="111740633" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2014 09:51:14 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6F9pDm1011836; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:51:14 GMT Message-ID: <53C4F991.2000906@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:51:13 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/N07iYA8UJ9rKys_59FyzyhWfDX4 Cc: Pete Resnick Subject: [Tools-discuss] button between tracker and trac X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:51:18 -0000 Dear all, Not sure if this was discussed already... A nice workflow improvement would be a button from the tracker to trac For example, from http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation/ to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/query?status=closed&component=radius-fragmentation Background info: I strongly suggest to my WGs to document their open issues. Regards, Benoit From nobody Fri Jul 18 06:43:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225561A045B for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:43:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLVgW3qqXRYU for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7DB1A0348 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230B81E41C8; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c9a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ProiKqfOLZ5X; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alices-mbp.home (pool-68-238-162-118.washdc.fios.verizon.net [68.238.162.118]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB7881E40EF; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Alice Russo In-Reply-To: <537246DB.2000207@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:43:10 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5371DF0C.7000409@cs.tcd.ie> <537246DB.2000207@fifthhorseman.net> To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/_9phX700_I2iSVu7iMnZf8WUBdw Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] more legacy HTTP URLs [Fwd: [perpass] Fwd: BCP 188, RFC 7258 on Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack] X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:43:18 -0000 Daniel, Thank you for raising this point. Having discussed this with the RSE = (Heather Flanagan), we will update the RFC publication announcement = accordingly. In the future, please report any issues with RFC publication = announcements to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Thank you. RFC Editor/ar On May 13, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hi IETF tools folks-- >=20 > Stephen Farrell forwarded the announcement below to the perpass list > today. It has more legacy URLs that probably should be converted to = HTTPS. >=20 > The message is a new RFC announcement. >=20 > the URLs that can be converted directly (e.g. s/http/https/) are: >=20 > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7258.txt > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://www.rfc-editor.org/search > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >=20 > And the following URL has a conversion that switches the hostname >=20 > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > It occurs to me that none of these are tools.ietf.org links, though, = so > maybe i'm reporting in the wrong place? Feel free to forward my mail = to > the right place, or to redirect me to wherever is useful. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > --dkg >=20 > From: Stephen Farrell > Date: May 13, 2014 4:59:56 AM EDT > To: perpass > Subject: [perpass] Fwd: BCP 188, RFC 7258 on Pervasive Monitoring Is = an Attack >=20 >=20 >=20 > FYI. Thanks to everyone who contributed, and who > is continuing to contribute as we get into the > more detailed work... >=20 > Cheers, > S. >=20 >=20 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: BCP 188, RFC 7258 on Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack > Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:45:35 -0700 (PDT) > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org > To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > CC: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 > BCP 188 > RFC 7258 >=20 > Title: Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack > Author: S. Farrell, H. Tschofenig > Status: Best Current Practice > Stream: IETF > Date: May 2014 > Mailbox: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, > Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net > Pages: 6 > Characters: 13396 > See Also: BCP 188 >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-farrell-perpass-attack-06.txt >=20 > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7258.txt >=20 > Pervasive monitoring is a technical attack that should be mitigated > in the design of IETF protocols, where possible. >=20 >=20 > BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for = the > Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for > improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. = Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > perpass@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org From nobody Fri Jul 18 22:26:27 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3764A1A044F for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:26:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wCraLqC3iC13 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732E01A042D for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.12.134] (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62FF0F984; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53CA0179.4020503@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:26:17 -0400 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/30.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alice Russo References: <5371DF0C.7000409@cs.tcd.ie> <537246DB.2000207@fifthhorseman.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uhvRjUmQf0BPQKPi3JLSIdLoQAoH58xAs" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/LnRoNrvxusOVqv_hkyz8eUc-G0g Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , RFC Editor Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] more legacy HTTP URLs [Fwd: [perpass] Fwd: BCP 188, RFC 7258 on Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack] X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:26:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --uhvRjUmQf0BPQKPi3JLSIdLoQAoH58xAs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/18/2014 09:43 AM, Alice Russo wrote: > Thank you for raising this point. Having discussed this with the RSE (H= eather Flanagan), we will update the RFC publication announcement accordi= ngly. >=20 > In the future, please report any issues with RFC publication announceme= nts to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Sure, will do. Thanks for getting the fix underway. If i notice anything else i'll report it as requested. Regards, --dkg --uhvRjUmQf0BPQKPi3JLSIdLoQAoH58xAs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTygF5XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQjk2OTEyODdBN0FEREUzNzU3RDkxMUVB NTI0MDFCMTFCRkRGQTVDAAoJEKUkAbEb/fpcd0MQAIfasnbn1g11JY01XxqEKDfn cNhcMgaPXm2LZEFCYwHr5nEwkxms4xx8oqKKIumX9cAiYF6gdNNjQ1eDS+DhhO8n Lf+SYA5vPSvEvJlRRSJ9fi4SOafgE8zbEhjMNWpBC3sbSyFJ/bFzrYLy1j3jQ90A zvw1O2jp7ZAWlt699R48CPCFPhKj8QSuTqUKwCwn45ksuJZROCe+odONLjTYXHsc RwweseWG5ifyeyNq9BIxr21dQGtczgWBPDZv74SYxQptYQ5ei/WsCOeko1D2McOs 2e3WJQHTOj5HTnMWKZm/pu2UocR7ICTjMUtRNd4P5Vsa5Y2HCgJ9uxH6c3SttAjC 40YU//uLJ9BdZeFoLElIvbL+Stdlgu5BrAe6Nc7/2L6ZAGMHupCb3EtcHASGFZLx vuc4s9RN4+CnKZ3C4ysiTTm41TaQfBCqc6nEO7K0sJiJ2O1JTqQ3SdlGP8vMn5Ob Vb7URSWD806xBwpoGIic0vcYAe0OMU21GX4NiUWJdK3MJvGi+HgnDkz1f+o/xbaK jkc1nYOJzEN0Dmd/cJDIsGo412dfaOmZ1VSaMiA0dqSBFcOL3Tn78Ti/xl/RgzLW /or7aRtwYbpeOnptWE8VRMC9myeXmdOAqxhpDHzmW08bPgydzpLoPo1JMcbxcT8I wFv3sJ3SKg+pbNqNjun9 =7wBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uhvRjUmQf0BPQKPi3JLSIdLoQAoH58xAs-- From nobody Sun Jul 20 09:13:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572911B2C76 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5UEFupCu2YI for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D611F1B2C85 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6KGDDvv008493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1405872800; x=1405959200; bh=2qVsHzDFFyU53+vuvKmN8PJUIf931BwxixJcVWVb6lM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=r961ZJtsCrVapEgD9/f/pt/oP8oWO1Gjkj3549cHUShd1gza6PrUN0fNSmnbasU+9 L4yOKdJ8/dbCo7uIjU2x/ezvViaXUspiFw556VjiDtLd94bmCh1ULPiIwjBk8yCI+t 6omCMch9cSN3zKIbLAGv3575GccR4GhQQhjIfoHs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1405872800; x=1405959200; i=@resistor.net; bh=2qVsHzDFFyU53+vuvKmN8PJUIf931BwxixJcVWVb6lM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=YosQNajjpJv/uL0ckKsgljddNhuges8JyBFAAQpqFltK03wPP0rLfWAzTI1/OAh8J 1O3HNbsAwqfbvOaJhVsfiFeYzFbW84XsrUiDUPxoqDCfXoa/1Yai0VosccbAd0Uvqw EFkEyXczSZobye3g59pQwrMtnbd/WkgiOrSL5HtI= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140720085823.0c4adf60@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:06:37 -0700 To: Paul Kyzivat From: SM In-Reply-To: <53CB23CE.8070507@alum.mit.edu> References: <53CB23CE.8070507@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/rf9ez5JmAX0y3M7Zo6KFjlfOrAg Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] "Versions" header on HTMLized drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:13:24 -0000 Hi Paul, [Cc to tools-discuss] At 19:05 19-07-2014, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >I'm seeing something odd in the metadata headers on HTMLized >versions of drafts: > >The header shows available versions of the document. IIUC, even when >looking at an older version this is supposed to list the newer >versions too. And it used to work that way. But now, at least for >some recent versions it is not. > >For instance, >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-clue-framework-13 shows >versions 00...15. Unfortunately there is also a version -16 that >isn't listed there. :-( I encountered a similar problem about a week ago and ended up reviewing a previous version of a draft. Is the HTMLized versions of drafts supposed to show the latest revision number available? Regards, -sm From nobody Tue Jul 22 14:36:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755BC1B2C7B; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7N3tUtp44Ax; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4486D1B2C70; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2328; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406064975; x=1407274575; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject; bh=N1TvOZ2GqiRG8pAVgFhUUm5mu5YyQ26aEj9oRzkaj+0=; b=hcsjeWAKcXNLHFFslYB0PKXdwgeLN7+BUZhSmg7h1ve/lAdMvYf3wTfd 73p7AjlZOWtsz0DlQEccEwHwrJNxuTheK/8hBi9okRg5c8hsrcvcPjnzH aEFfYhwibaUxBgcZFNovovE4ILzGtVA9rxPRaGaTj82mlbI0otbqagCkp 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8LAGDYzlOtJA2G/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SVwHHJodFgRQWdoUCAR8BHBYYAwIBAgFLDQEHAQGIPg2/cRePS4RNAQSORYxigU2FSo0cg2IhMIECJA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.01,712,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="63151777" Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2014 21:36:14 +0000 Received: from [10.82.213.100] (rtp-vpn4-1380.cisco.com [10.82.213.100]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6MLaDaa020464; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:36:14 GMT Message-ID: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:36:12 -0400 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Levkowetz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020100040109070802050209" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/8B5HQSw5Wkkj6mDd6YI7S8WiKlY Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:36:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020100040109070802050209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/ Regards, Benoit Internal Server Error. The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in a script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an overload problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again in a little while. A failure report with details about what happened has been sent to the server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker , too. --------------020100040109070802050209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all,

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/

Regards, Benoit

Internal Server Error.

The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in a script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an overload problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again in a little while.

A failure report with details about what happened has been sent to the server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker, too.




--------------020100040109070802050209-- From nobody Tue Jul 22 14:38:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5EB1B2C85 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:38:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaLqSTPsYlfI for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4141B2B8E for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEE81E5D4E; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c9a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umHTyFj-74dS; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-bb8e.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bb8e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.187.142]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07B5C1E5D4A; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0808F46B-5E58-40D3-91FC-D7F4229A2C00" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) From: Alexa Morris In-Reply-To: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:38:46 -0400 Message-Id: <12288BB9-EB29-4214-AF16-536370C9F198@amsl.com> References: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> To: Benoit Claise X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/UlFdzfsJT-uKF8qCkubBU-u6QyA Cc: Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:38:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_0808F46B-5E58-40D3-91FC-D7F4229A2C00 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I just clicked on the link and had no difficulty reaching the page. Are = you still experiencing an issue? Alexa On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/ >=20 > Regards, Benoit >=20 > Internal Server Error. >=20 > The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete = your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in a = script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an overload = problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again in a little = while. >=20 > A failure report with details about what happened has been sent to the = server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug = report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker, = too. >=20 >=20 >=20 ---------- Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001 Email: amorris@amsl.com Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS) Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning www.amsl.com --Apple-Mail=_0808F46B-5E58-40D3-91FC-D7F4229A2C00 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I just = clicked on the link and had no difficulty reaching the page. Are you = still experiencing an = issue?

Alexa

On Jul 22, 2014, = at 5:36 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> = wrote:

=20 =20
Dear all,

http:= //datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/

Regards, Benoit

Internal Server Error.

The server = encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in a script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an overload problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again in a little while.

A failure report with details about = what happened has been sent to the server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker, too.





----------
Alexa Morris / = Executive Director / IETF
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA =  94538
Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: = +1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris@amsl.com

Managed by = Association Management Solutions (AMS)
Forum Management, Meeting and = Event Planning
www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/>

= --Apple-Mail=_0808F46B-5E58-40D3-91FC-D7F4229A2C00-- From nobody Tue Jul 22 14:45:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41BD1B2CA9; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHPwAbF-6K-W; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818D61B2C82; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:45:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3008; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406065517; x=1407275117; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=1lHP/vKXmMovKVX2z5jwD1P3Dlk01mNrIKim0FXZ8cI=; b=lRrtRsqhZEvLKyUauba3DVdpQFo+aOPqhxlQsH/CKEE673o+T6jh7vjp ++h+vKNUoJR6/OA9UK+0N5iIyVSy2xU48KhD1L28e2UfPO1ujMdmiheBN PD+Bucn1ovx5hF8u4VAEv83hfEuCU9pBEQB9v9c6Dk0v1MnX+kHia1xne k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjILALTazlOtJA2N/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SVwHHJodFAYESFnaEBAEBBHkQCwQdJQ8CRgYNAQcBAYg+Db9tF48JQgeERgEEjkWMYoFNhUqNHINiITCBAgIeBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.01,712,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="63147517" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2014 21:45:16 +0000 Received: from [10.82.213.100] (rtp-vpn4-1380.cisco.com [10.82.213.100]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6MLjGmS029603; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:45:16 GMT Message-ID: <53CEDB69.306@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:45:13 -0400 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Levkowetz References: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090308060609000302090300" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/EpW2JceV-zNUz656Oul-a29rvUs Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:45:19 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090308060609000302090300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Interestingly, firefox auto-upgraded to version 31, and fails. IE and Chrome work fine. Weird. Regards, Benoit > Dear all, > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/ > > Regards, Benoit > > > Internal Server Error. > > The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete > your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in > a script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an > overload problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again > in a little while. > > A failure report with details about what happened has been sent to the > server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug > report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker > , too. > > > > --------------090308060609000302090300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Interestingly, firefox auto-upgraded to version 31, and fails.
IE and Chrome work fine.

Weird.

Regards, Benoit
Dear all,

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vanderstok-core-comi/

Regards, Benoit

Internal Server Error.

The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there was an error in a script used to generate the requested page. In case this was an overload problem or other temporary error, you may want to try again in a little while.

A failure report with details about what happened has been sent to the server administrators. It would be helpful if you would file a bug report with additional information at the IETF database issue tracker, too.





--------------090308060609000302090300-- From nobody Tue Jul 22 14:57:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92F21B2CB8 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTfXHuy7kWde for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF0B1A03EA for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k48so279827wev.26 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tYvYCmIeW/9E/56cp45cqEd9nQo01Vp/kqE6GXwocK0=; b=QTXJoZRAJiVmH7QRQLRYjwlDHhhFASOmIKk1Xo4ZN/+HdzoE5GMHFmf7YfVd6Ry/xK HpRWYE+YAaHZEu7IN1ejGA4+VSZ1rGxyQnJCrROBpk/hC1HIHtDFNM+6alz7f+fk/ix1 t8b5XborBqjcQ3DNxuP3yyEy72U/AeXVsemwDo7C2ZOj1ZwH9WV2kxPbwVv5ToX5xnBc ILnZ8c+MyeF4sH7+rLwbvhETY/0jJKL6oMXH2h36b+M53vdfg1n7h5TwUkV/MGP9Z3jw xaQ9CPBPivJJxNXTvcZt9EW+4edLxAwdvzbADxgwbYbhxpLw2hCjg9EeQZI/x6Ej7Bwd aPlQ== X-Received: by 10.180.218.12 with SMTP id pc12mr19160172wic.15.1406066260635; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-a223.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:816b:125e:2fde:56ec]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ex4sm1575178wic.2.2014.07.22.14.57.38 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53CEDE4F.1070306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:57:35 -0400 From: Tim Wicinski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benoit Claise , Henrik Levkowetz References: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> <53CEDB69.306@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <53CEDB69.306@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/8gVhs7QDooiGyTvsg-tzh04bJ7s Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:57:45 -0000 On 7/22/14 5:45 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Interestingly, firefox auto-upgraded to version 31, and fails. > IE and Chrome work fine. > > Weird. > > Regards, Benoit Benoit I was going to say your computer has started your holiday before you, but I ran into a problem with a draft during DANE: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gilmore-dane-rawkeys/ but the adopted draft did show up: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-rawkeys/ also, this one failed: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogud-dane-vocabulary/ (this was in Chrome). Coudl this be the new datatracker version just rolled out? From nobody Tue Jul 22 15:07:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658AC1A02EF for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLsfEUFxqo3d for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F3A1A035E for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963551E5D46; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c9a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtOFNvVgpPhc; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-bb8e.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bb8e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.187.142]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 158B91E1890; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) From: Alexa Morris In-Reply-To: <53CEDE4F.1070306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:07:10 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> <53CEDB69.306@cisco.com> <53CEDE4F.1070306@gmail.com> To: Tim Wicinski X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/L6uRa5SB5MNCQu_wqM1IxZt4M-w Cc: Benoit Claise , Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:07:14 -0000 There was an issue with the new datatracker release, so we just rolled = back to the previous release and all should be well now. Alexa On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 7/22/14 5:45 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: >> Interestingly, firefox auto-upgraded to version 31, and fails. >> IE and Chrome work fine. >>=20 >> Weird. >>=20 >> Regards, Benoit >=20 > Benoit >=20 > I was going to say your computer has started your holiday before you, = but I ran into a problem with a draft during DANE: >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gilmore-dane-rawkeys/ >=20 > but the adopted draft did show up: >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-rawkeys/ >=20 > also, this one failed: >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogud-dane-vocabulary/ >=20 > (this was in Chrome). >=20 > Coudl this be the new datatracker version just rolled out? >=20 > --=20 > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org >=20 ---------- Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001 Email: amorris@amsl.com Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS) Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning www.amsl.com From nobody Tue Jul 22 15:23:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A231B28F7 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:23:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.502 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HL2VRvcB95IU for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B82E1B28D3 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:23:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1694; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406067806; x=1407277406; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z1PoHojcbdeGu1NW5BCjR0Tu48Mzn6Xq4AKN66fyYX4=; b=TQqBtm577a+plGtjF7fd/MD18SxYj2EgnerZFZ/ObvzeP7xZAGvauvNX I85elRwpDDxpl670Ec8/mdMcG+aCLTRd/moUS+XVLQgtXXZ4TBNNLCXza bq78+rNuogqoUV350c7ROJ6wW7e5KxOQr4Z+w28oeETC1Tx+efznxRKLD I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlcFAOXjzlOtJA2L/2dsb2JhbABWA4MOUlfHHQqHRQGBEhZ2hAQBAQQBAQE1ESUKAQ4CCwcHCgkWDwkDAgECAQkGBh8RBgEMAQUCAQEXiBMDEQ24dw2HHBcEjRqBSxEBDjIQBxGENQEEmSSCA4FNhUqHAIYcg2IhL4EFBxc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,712,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="342092062" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2014 22:23:25 +0000 Received: from [10.82.213.100] (rtp-vpn4-1380.cisco.com [10.82.213.100]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6MMNPev012524; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:23:25 GMT Message-ID: <53CEE459.1060406@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:23:21 -0400 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexa Morris , Tim Wicinski References: <53CED94C.2060805@cisco.com> <53CEDB69.306@cisco.com> <53CEDE4F.1070306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/zAbVA2zE8BedxaEOCwVPXjDMeC0 Cc: Henrik Levkowetz , Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] tracker down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:23:28 -0000 On 22/07/2014 18:07, Alexa Morris wrote: > There was an issue with the new datatracker release, so we just rolled back to the previous release and all should be well now. Yes, it works for me now. Regards, Benoit > > Alexa > > On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > >> >> On 7/22/14 5:45 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: >>> Interestingly, firefox auto-upgraded to version 31, and fails. >>> IE and Chrome work fine. >>> >>> Weird. >>> >>> Regards, Benoit >> Benoit >> >> I was going to say your computer has started your holiday before you, but I ran into a problem with a draft during DANE: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gilmore-dane-rawkeys/ >> >> but the adopted draft did show up: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-rawkeys/ >> >> also, this one failed: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogud-dane-vocabulary/ >> >> (this was in Chrome). >> >> Coudl this be the new datatracker version just rolled out? >> >> -- >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> >> Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb >> Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or >> send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org >> > ---------- > Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF > 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 > Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001 > Email: amorris@amsl.com > > Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS) > Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning > www.amsl.com > > . >