From nobody Sat Aug 9 16:41:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD731A03AD for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:41:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYbXnobwZPce for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167AF1A0185 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 16:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so9201354pad.27 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:41:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0qG+A6Sf/jAk/J1tkCY4FxG31aSaTqbBF5xVkFJ6D2M=; b=vGBkWViU2uT1jcTPMC6Fgmy1+MfhoxPV9xNNhwRAKe/n+xKwRyhUjWqch7pmYghoy8 prLYw6PAPZa53rLV9nPPLPoolf7NghqcK6nIdPsjQAfFrE1nX8ky7Ay2/5Y5OmkICNbw /RHsNtg3BGtlJUS8JaacIx/EfAZPK3UsakHYL97vTZZuezXWajYN7yuhqLwqlv+nEMUt GU/0jW/rYFUAiQGmmOCp0XF0JT52wgwdJGz9VHp5Ji+sOHDyjf52sLb+eW5w/A58Rp8W CQuxVqzmV13khFedDdGJafYfN6yGP+KUZ7GJYJCf8GHL07vmmP4LTUCXG8DHFKArsx/V A3gg== X-Received: by 10.70.55.228 with SMTP id v4mr20079191pdp.117.1407627703737; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (11.198.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.198.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm10650743pdm.22.2014.08.09.16.41.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53E6B1B5.70607@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 11:41:41 +1200 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/tx4vlS0WJRb_5qNERydsoch96Yo Subject: [Tools-discuss] pre-WG wiki? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 23:41:45 -0000 I should know this but I don't: is it possible to set up a wiki for pre-WG discussions (with the option that it morphs into a WG wiki if the WG is approved)? Regards Brian From nobody Mon Aug 11 07:13:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D581A03DB for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:13:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygWisnxN6G-q for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB611A03D4 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53502 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1XGqLW-0002Q1-Tw; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:13:11 -0700 Message-ID: <53E8CF72.30008@levkowetz.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:13:06 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian E Carpenter , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <53E6B1B5.70607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53E6B1B5.70607@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/VwHD_Mo9LfpeBRpNI79FyVZOxUU Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] pre-WG wiki? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:13:12 -0000 Hi Brian, On 2014-08-10 01:41 Brian E Carpenter said the following: > I should know this but I don't: is it possible to set up > a wiki for pre-WG discussions (with the option that it > morphs into a WG wiki if the WG is approved)? Sure. What is the acronym? Best regards, Henrik From nobody Tue Aug 12 14:16:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F521A066B for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20Y15RVKboYU for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153EC1A055D for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i7so7793636oag.2 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PLyUiAco6fM2NyXg00WRCgaMh2X8O8XqzX2SRK2kBgk=; b=AoChyYf3F3GUr24xLFoO0eNGZZxlyuLYJf5I3xxxu1ICHmNAmARpAGfCSr22ZvRob9 1Eoja1AovrsqV/2NRumZToulSDpkOFs9FmwaF/c7qwrMnA2y/Fovdray+LzYDcSLV79E DVkRNSK1xgEszlZzcUXyzoX91mXSUoWJ4WuTwOY4fJwBD2KWTEgoe486tprpBFZ98CCU a+O3kmNS7Su8+uajWveUTcbxBUjzYukrnT2yu9zDl8iDayt2YqP4/zYTJTWRCJ6DmI0b r9Mn8wDZWQCJxOHiqIfR+Vf/EJvjQfP0KleeuK6yavffYPPjjCXE+MtCxkwm1LSKEscP cbKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.23.39 with SMTP id j7mr556870oef.20.1407878203457; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.181.105 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: Richard Barnes To: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/cMYSy2K5rFhJUkgszrDzTJ1wJ_k Subject: [Tools-discuss] Login flap X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:16:45 -0000 I tried to edit a wiki page on tools.ietf.org [1], and oddly, the page kept logging me out. When I viewed the page, my email address appeared instead of the login link at the top, but when I clicked "Edit", it switches back to show the login link, and says I'm not authorized. Or sometimes it lets me through to the edit screen, then logs me out when I try to submit the changes. ? --Richard [1] https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/InformalAgenda From nobody Wed Aug 13 03:21:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8B71A86F7 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:21:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsQCQUS7R5hg for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B31A1A86F2 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37297 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1XHVg9-0008AK-IQ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:21:13 -0700 Message-ID: <53EB3C11.8010804@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:21:05 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Barnes , Tools Team Discussion References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: richard.barnes@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Mfb2m0898aN3sZ-aJ3PgPAblzIk Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Login flap X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:21:16 -0000 Hi Richard, On 2014-08-12 23:16 Richard Barnes said the following: > I tried to edit a wiki page on tools.ietf.org [1], and oddly, the page > kept logging me out. When I viewed the page, my email address > appeared instead of the login link at the top, but when I clicked > "Edit", it switches back to show the login link, and says I'm not > authorized. Or sometimes it lets me through to the edit screen, then > logs me out when I try to submit the changes. I've had a few reports of similar cases, but haven't managed to get a clue as to where the problem lies. Based on earlier reports, it seems to predominantly occur with Safari as client. Which browser were you using? Best regards, Henrik From nobody Wed Aug 13 04:23:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEA61A86F7 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-h7EbCr-VaX for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7081A86F6 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h136so7447380oig.7 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5yMlP6w/3bidGq4FuJjjKE4jwV/RHwFeHfnJSQsvomY=; b=vGGa3Msl2GA+7/XtV2rkBWsWgjcXUoTGq+0VjMiTAxcy5xB+xv+OUl58ISRo3uf6lE JeyYnxnocm/JFyzd31ilVxxCwKzKFerjUhTctibNfzrgRYj9CujKTcwHn9nv2D6Gut5s E41LPHLuKx2vVK5SbdXjsoDYVMxsAiWi12KMDxt2m8NrycJ9a2WonRbqnGViTMnf6QIe cF1Ks4TIwHITQZXmBzEy6Bw6xgLI3Y1W5D5Pi8f+VamA9shbkaWCI0PxG7s2W9VLI3dM KSH3+PZUGTQvP09x2peYuHcaZDmFo/q121y5T84qUsZFWCdmYN01hRfYesra1NvvlQLB XxoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.70.65 with SMTP id k1mr4012549oeu.61.1407928986601; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.181.105 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:23:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53EB3C11.8010804@levkowetz.com> References: <53EB3C11.8010804@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:23:06 -0400 Message-ID: From: Richard Barnes To: Henrik Levkowetz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113345ec1d8f570500810396 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/eF37i8gVFRP72sjsNW1P6jPnE9U Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Login flap X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:23:09 -0000 --001a113345ec1d8f570500810396 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This was with Firefox Nightly. On Wednesday, August 13, 2014, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On 2014-08-12 23:16 Richard Barnes said the following: > > I tried to edit a wiki page on tools.ietf.org [1], and oddly, the page > > kept logging me out. When I viewed the page, my email address > > appeared instead of the login link at the top, but when I clicked > > "Edit", it switches back to show the login link, and says I'm not > > authorized. Or sometimes it lets me through to the edit screen, then > > logs me out when I try to submit the changes. > > I've had a few reports of similar cases, but haven't managed to get a clue > as to where the problem lies. Based on earlier reports, it seems to > predominantly occur with Safari as client. Which browser were you using? > > > Best regards, > > Henrik > > --001a113345ec1d8f570500810396 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This was with Firefox Nightly.=C2=A0

On Wednesday, August 13, 2014, = Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowe= tz.com> wrote:
Hi Richard,

On 2014-08-12 23:16 Richard Barnes said the following:
> I tried to edit a wiki page on tools.ietf.org [1], and oddly, the page
> kept logging me out. =C2=A0When I viewed the page, my email address > appeared instead of the login link at the top, but when I clicked
> "Edit", it switches back to show the login link, and says I&= #39;m not
> authorized. =C2=A0Or sometimes it lets me through to the edit screen, = then
> logs me out when I try to submit the changes.

I've had a few reports of similar cases, but haven't managed to get= a clue
as to where the problem lies. =C2=A0Based on earlier reports, it seems to predominantly occur with Safari as client. =C2=A0Which browser were you usi= ng?


Best regards,

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Henrik

--001a113345ec1d8f570500810396-- From nobody Thu Aug 14 07:16:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5875D1A0B79 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:16:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.647 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QrTAo2IBb2Vw for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D551A0B78 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7EEGg7S037496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:16:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60] claimed to be [10.20.30.90] From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:16:40 -0700 To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/otFJ0Cx6n_CXIpC4EIHNttqJTkE Subject: [Tools-discuss] SVN for WGs? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:16:47 -0000 Greetings. On the main tools page, under "WG Subversion Repositories", = it says: Some IETF Working Groups have subversion repositories set up, to = facilitate cooperative editing and change tracking. To find the = repository of a WG, please go to the WG status page and follow the link = which says 'Svn' in the top horizontal menubar. If there is no such = link, the WG doesn't have a registered issue tracker. In order to check = out a document from the repository, find the svn url to it, then use:=20 =E2=80=83svn co Its the creation of an svn repo really linked to having a Trac instance = for the WG? Or do all WGs get an svn repo? --Paul Hoffman= From nobody Fri Aug 15 14:53:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE711A06D4 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ij5nYJeenvza for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661321A06CC for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so1393280wiv.5 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6waekvgVeG41TDf7xXiC7NSCk4cWKehBtGJjaN40wAc=; b=gf/4Eh2/RDztzkf/0m/zo4hlDr9nTVBxMWjhHVs+DTXhkZxNacIDbYkyC+GoOaTSca 49hL/8/wxKsnaogzMdvP8FlDXzxqe0BCE97sbottJCITVQyt1TCkAGhcyrMsXZ/S7HVc LVZ6dYP7L3uJ7i3tJx3MY0mcSenXivutSSYBJi+eZZ1EGEwTPYtsTn67ISVqWN8le7mf DhJm7wPJR8LtL/GR9r2H1Itsj0eb5YSTKmgKY1PIyiUn9KLQYrfur+/1AnkI0079l+Tu EiATzvym/nmgvF0V1DRaZjKEt0WEmN3HqI5cLObZHi3kcdkB1ZP3uUSrNSECPQXDVx7x mJ+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.205.70 with SMTP id le6mr23343236wjc.25.1408139629024; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:53:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Martin Thomson To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/JjlbnTrQkMvGjuyih2ep_bDanXc Subject: [Tools-discuss] tools.ietf.org/html redirects X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:53:53 -0000 Taking DKG's role for a moment... These produce http:// URIs from https:// requests when redirecting (e.g., from draft-ietf-foo to draft-ietf-foo-07). In order of preference, could these either: 1. include an 's' in all the schemes (it's not quite HSTS, but it's still an improvement) 2. copy the scheme from the request From nobody Mon Aug 18 11:24:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF131A0894 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:24:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.647 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-eaK3r1BvAB for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346251A0747 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7IIOPqk009807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:24:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60] claimed to be [10.20.30.90] From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:24:25 -0700 To: Tools Team Discussion Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/LNV3q2AObhOUA0Rqn2q2Q6nBPL0 Subject: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:24:29 -0000 Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show new = drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but = draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that (:-)) = and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the SLA, or = an operational bug? --Paul Hoffman= From nobody Tue Aug 19 07:49:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0451A8913 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:49:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMPBOwWjnelw for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593401A0390 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40846 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1XJkiY-0008SU-6t; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:48:58 -0700 Message-ID: <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:48:51 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman , Tools Team Discussion References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/JJWFnUeS8LzQSY4uoBhr_Xo1i8M Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:49:01 -0000 Hi Paul, On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following: > Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show > new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but > draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that > (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the > SLA, or an operational bug? Sounds like a bug. I'm investigating. Regards, Henrik From nobody Tue Aug 19 07:59:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B872D1A893B for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.647 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTxsoiiQNxKy for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DDC1A8940 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7JExcOK058393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181] claimed to be [10.20.30.90] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:59:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/0AifYYxsQhUtPfNM1IJbUfyku2k Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:59:43 -0000 On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following: >> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show >> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but >> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that >> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the >> SLA, or an operational bug? > > Sounds like a bug. I'm investigating. It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting. --Paul Hoffman From nobody Tue Aug 19 08:08:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1581A03CF for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ymHKkSGGbhfK for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egssmtp01.att.com (egssmtp01.att.com [144.160.112.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808FD1A03A8 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp01.att.com ( egs 8.14.5 TLS/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7JF8S9T026223 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:08:28 -0500 Received: from vpn-135-70-97-64.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.97.64]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140819150827gw100j0ctpe>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:08:28 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.70.97.64] Message-ID: <53F3689E.7090803@att.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:09:18 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman , Henrik Levkowetz References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Crp8igIOsQJ87lwjZa5mT7knh4Y Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:08:32 -0000 On 8/19/14, 10:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following: >>> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show >>> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but >>> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that >>> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the >>> SLA, or an operational bug? >> Sounds like a bug. I'm investigating. > It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting. A useful enhancement is for the 404 processor to double check to see if this is a new document before reporting such the 404 Not Found error. If it finds it, it initiates an immediate update for that document. Should this be added to the code sprint's list of items? Tony From nobody Tue Aug 19 08:24:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD841A0421 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:24:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSZ51cudgMAS for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA051A0412 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42461 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1XJlGo-00071u-HX; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:24:22 -0700 Message-ID: <53F36C20.6030709@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:24:16 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Hansen , Paul Hoffman References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> <53F3689E.7090803@att.com> In-Reply-To: <53F3689E.7090803@att.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tony@att.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/lMn5_PeUGtdpN23Y3L6dG_AXj6o Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:24:25 -0000 On 2014-08-19 17:09 Tony Hansen said the following: > On 8/19/14, 10:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following: >>>> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show >>>> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but >>>> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that >>>> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the >>>> SLA, or an operational bug? >>> Sounds like a bug. I'm investigating. >> It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting. > > A useful enhancement is for the 404 processor to double check to see if > this is a new document before reporting such the 404 Not Found error. If > it finds it, it initiates an immediate update for that document. > > Should this be added to the code sprint's list of items? No, I'm looking at implementing a notify-on-change model as a lower- bandwidth, lower-latency alternative. Best regards, Henrik From nobody Tue Aug 19 08:29:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91AD1A03F9 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIVsbRnXDV1q for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60871A0390 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42581 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1XJlM3-0007E1-IK; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:29:47 -0700 Message-ID: <53F36D65.6060200@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:29:41 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/heuqHAzXES17-x29h41HrDIGlSE Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:29:49 -0000 On 2014-08-19 16:59 Paul Hoffman said the following: > On Aug 19, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> On 2014-08-18 20:24 Paul Hoffman said the following: >>> Greetings again. I thought that tools.ietf.org was supposed to show >>> new drafts within 15 minutes of publication, but >>> draft-hoffman-dns-tls-stub-00 is now many minutes older than that >>> (:-)) and it still gets a Not Found. Is this me misunderstanding the >>> SLA, or an operational bug? >> >> Sounds like a bug. I'm investigating. > > It showed up on tools.ietf.org about an hour after posting. Ack. I've found the issue with the frequent updates -- should be fixed now. Best regards, Henrik From nobody Tue Aug 19 09:19:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115871A048F for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:19:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.247 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X46L5WhDHx4I for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egssmtp03.att.com (egssmtp03.att.com [144.160.128.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDD51A0666 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp03.att.com ( egs 8.14.5 TLS/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7JGJWdH007887 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:19:35 -0700 Received: from vpn-135-70-97-64.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.97.64]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140819161932gw100j0ctqe>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:19:32 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.70.97.64] Message-ID: <53F37946.409@att.com> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:20:22 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Tools Team Discussion References: <82765ACB-5CBF-416E-8576-5AC7627974CF@vpnc.org> <53F363D3.4090304@levkowetz.com> <53F3689E.7090803@att.com> <53F36C20.6030709@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <53F36C20.6030709@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/zAVTIyAFfUkYTnR3fckQkFaC4QA Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Long delay in tools.ietf.org and new drafts X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:19:37 -0000 On 8/19/14, 11:24 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > > On 2014-08-19 17:09 Tony Hansen said the following: >> A useful enhancement is for the 404 processor to double check to see if >> this is a new document before reporting such the 404 Not Found error. If >> it finds it, it initiates an immediate update for that document. >> >> Should this be added to the code sprint's list of items? > No, I'm looking at implementing a notify-on-change model as a lower- > bandwidth, lower-latency alternative. Even better! :-) Tony Hansen