From nobody Thu Oct 1 12:41:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824CF1A8955 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:40:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKKp5dC8Jqkx for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B5E1A893F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41792 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhjip-00063K-RT; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:40:56 -0700 To: "Andrew G. Malis" , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <560D8C1D.7010002@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:40:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vcoXoNNIJLP9OogP2unamkSDCrwIXm4Qp" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, agmalis@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Bug in IETF diff tool X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:40:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vcoXoNNIJLP9OogP2unamkSDCrwIXm4Qp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andy, On 2015-10-01 20:50, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Henrik et al, >=20 > I found a bug today in the IETF diff tool. I've attached three > files, draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-01.txt, > draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements-02.txt, > and the output of the diffs tool. >=20 > The diffs tool failed to report one of the changes I made from -01 to -= 02. >=20 > In section 3, item 2, first line, I changed "setup" in revision -01 to = "set > up" in revision -02. However, the diff tool reports this as unchanged i= n > revision -02 and shows the text as "setup" in both files. Yes, I see I had it running with --ignore-whitespace on the web service. = I seem to remember that the reason for that was that (at the time) too many draf= ts had excessive right-hand whitespace, which would then result in insanely wide= diff columns. I'll strip trailing line whitespace instead. Please, when reporting bugs on tools at tools.ietf.org, report directly t= o me or webmaster@tools.ietf.org, which goes to me. Best regards, Henrik --vcoXoNNIJLP9OogP2unamkSDCrwIXm4Qp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWDYwmAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcajp0P/R9jYMIOT3k5bdMJjh54senC qhIh5LmEp45vqtVSaWgI0P6+j/9myC1mdbh3y07WyYYT0R050toEK63rPVMMG7qL xVzC6fuUCBOHB2G+EHvaCdsyDobcupaRHMjE975udnaFH5JPLJh1mgEjb3qms7x6 UcV06I3XNWjtJ39WlVrKoc4bR4Qf4YEUWpXhjYtxIxfRmb2KfDPYRQKjvJTNK7+W 7iwpcCoW09TbQIw2G5hGtlgUWdwSCy0eCTplGdNoqJQ0bz9uvSm7mw2WT7pL9vS8 zuksnTEUl26dh8i2lOUjVk7yfdiLunB7UE5Y1cIrbH4rPyHxP8pAqihElwpbMoiZ ac2udeneJZuMwIYzKiWIt3XdwRM32oEGovSwPPUEcFEYv6rcABnTwz1x1BGhuVEu 4uEeO9E64w3jSOEcv4apZW8KkQWmb061yea9L1gsNufid7HuW3LiB9PkguKzdNcV o41FvujRtoba8rolWrA6cc3UMheiBWEwjf1QYTOC6uK1OkzJlQWxj2APCjY28nEm pde+2pe8EAUUM7LXxmjZvEGYDc/DPYxs+yWVP4elrHphW6TA+to6cqhYTAJVkdDA ByU3Nt1/79zWxk44UIlzI5HmYPdV5we1sUugeqyWi/XXw9OnR6+l0iODwDnM7IcN nAxlzKS22waWarSJR7Lg =m3gH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vcoXoNNIJLP9OogP2unamkSDCrwIXm4Qp-- From nobody Sun Oct 11 08:56:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786C01B2B14 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgbQ0yyyy1KX for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6A11B2B13 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so60819822igb.0 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:subject:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=8JrOF2bOtdJSJVkJneNO00z+WZPekl7oY104ywGDkQ8=; b=kxas4bjucjrdFFW3LspcoTP+b3tGBNCGtD1sYukErXFLdp1b1Omk1eG2EVLogqyOB6 v5mjCCv6MAz8rIhbJjPnUY0579x551m2KJsnu+ypPojimcT0fzYfD6ZrHgg/iLkdUlJc 1oXQ/Y4RZr6DcxLUHWUfy1ZUkPtblNknvWAbytQjpSFymzBwjiC60Ajn2H3ibe66OCcu YCFk3byFtJ8XPAIIHj1A4dyV95lWN24NDq+g1ijgkc4vI5pQWna6l7NXBIW35ICvfs2H ATmh6g3aBMRQidBLNUB4ztvUrw+bbyZwKqYkybsGs3eE0beG6D1qJhtsOA9lplllBbD5 82kQ== X-Received: by 10.50.57.84 with SMTP id g20mr8295399igq.18.1444579003493; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from still.local ([184.13.114.26]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ql6sm3292580igc.15.2015.10.11.08.56.42 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: Tim Wicinski Message-ID: <561A86BA.8030301@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:56:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010503060904020005020303" Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.13.02 feedback X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:56:45 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010503060904020005020303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi The tools makes mention of "non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses" in one of the checks. But 5735 has been updated by 6598. this should be updated. tim --------------010503060904020005020303 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi

The tools makes mention of "non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses"  in one of the checks.
But 5735 has been updated by 6598.  this should be updated.

tim

 --------------010503060904020005020303-- From nobody Sun Oct 11 12:41:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523B1A1A34 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:41:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFPXNKxc5i3j for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D131A1A30 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41648 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlMUj-0006lD-Qo; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:41:22 -0700 To: Tim Wicinski , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <561A86BA.8030301@gmail.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <561ABB5F.2080204@levkowetz.com> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 21:41:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561A86BA.8030301@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TUFM7h7XT8tpDlxfgNwf50hTAsvp49nqQ" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.13.02 feedback X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:41:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TUFM7h7XT8tpDlxfgNwf50hTAsvp49nqQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, On 2015-10-11 17:56, Tim Wicinski wrote: > Hi >=20 > The tools makes mention of "non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses" in=20 > one of the checks. > But 5735 has been updated by 6598. this should be updated. Umm. 6598 specifies the allocation of a /10 (100.64.0.0/10) for use in carrier-grade NATs, but that doesn't make this range suitable for example use in IDs and RFCs, from what I can see? The addresses which idnits warns about are addresses which don't fall into the ranges specified by 5735 for documentation and example use, and I don't see that this has changed? Best regards, Henrik --TUFM7h7XT8tpDlxfgNwf50hTAsvp49nqQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWGrtfAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaPVIP/0Ls3fqiEM1QGR0zgC1RNIrc PCqbyCA1MweEB3Y8zG8YV4M8+zQo1VMJeMyP4/eMxysEZKMBIgi39Xb319zmMKP7 D9v7MPyFpdces5Anl8A30MvC3wLkBex1ZQZIHgFpxzLXzP06OcfqbNCalZRD2O2k HnVNPkO3vqieF1HCZnWpsUmX00uVmBs6f6E2S6xeeBAbiiSd531X1Zm3/8fRsJFS pXjrvm7HZfHq1XJaoOH1o71WNjM2ufsfKAWzouvSUZnIAsMKH9lwDFaa4W7p+kV6 diua9HmX+vRj+zJv1h8m73PjOIA8JCC7Y8wZCC9/N9mnh1cRIUSL1ZovPTVhV/uA Lk7AS/7PS5asBUfc75TsdtAFLNVl5bvo10JRkRs8RVH59XVSX4cfLeJ2SmJAedAH OBaAD+x1nfB9SOZKWc3r1002zvKGFBYn6uvvkQ3D1StNLluU2ssG0CEvXSuEJtUZ ziGPp3lwQqUVk4jtP0xUyF/mBv6XU3dKP2nt5blCDAvwxPU77oPoLLIWtHpg7FPW W5UDqTuQymyQq5S5NKMQQ8Hue2tlXIzQmcceZJJG9Pu3kNadLOE3Pdn5l9Wj3GNn thANHyxYdOZy0Flzb2EukAUDsEOi9S0xjTbSknYCoohmQRoSpjGr81wAhPK1tcP4 /FtCC3hs1hB8sOnF2jmr =09YN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TUFM7h7XT8tpDlxfgNwf50hTAsvp49nqQ-- From nobody Mon Oct 12 12:50:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D141B35B2 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:50:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyUSGXFaIftJ for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974331B35B0 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049463.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t9CJnHWH010968 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:50:04 -0400 Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xey27fryb-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:50:04 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CJo48B029390 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:50:04 -0400 Received: from alpi133.aldc.att.com (alpi133.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.3]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CJnvrw029249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:49:59 -0400 Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi133.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:49:48 GMT Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CJnmGG017450 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:49:48 -0400 Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CJnk8c017382 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:49:46 -0400 Received: from tonys-macbook-pro.local (unknown[135.110.240.235](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20151012194941gw100dvb4de>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:49:45 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.110.240.235] References: <20151007220439.18004.73133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Tools Team Discussion From: Tony Hansen X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20151007220439.18004.73133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: <561C0ED5.3050707@att.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:49:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151007220439.18004.73133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020302070109000206060606" X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-10-12_13:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1510120238 Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] interesting author in: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:50:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020302070109000206060606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Note the authors in this I-D announcement. Something messed up somewhere. Tony Hansen -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:04:39 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org CC: imapext@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IMAP APPEND Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : The IMAP APPENDLIMIT Extension Authors : Samsung Telecommunications America Narendra Singh Bisht Filename : draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2015-10-07 Abstract: This memo defines an extension to the IMAP service whereby a server can advertise its capability, to support maximum mail upload size using CAPABILITY, STATUS and LIST commands. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list imapext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext --------------020302070109000206060606 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Note the authors in this I-D announcement. Something messed up somewhere.

    Tony Hansen


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:04:39 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: imapext@ietf.org 


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the IMAP APPEND Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : The IMAP APPENDLIMIT Extension
        Authors         : Samsung Telecommunications America
                          Narendra Singh Bisht
	Filename        : draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt
	Pages           : 7
	Date            : 2015-10-07

Abstract:
This memo defines an extension to the IMAP service whereby a server can
advertise its capability, to support maximum mail upload size using
CAPABILITY, STATUS and LIST commands.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
imapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext


--------------020302070109000206060606-- From nobody Tue Oct 13 09:47:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CBA1B4BA0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zz0oZC0jtHt9 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB291B4B9E for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52851 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2jv-000434-1k; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:47:51 -0700 To: Tony Hansen , Tools Team Discussion References: <20151007220439.18004.73133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <561C0ED5.3050707@att.com> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <561D35AE.1060507@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:47:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561C0ED5.3050707@att.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G2qK7h0gsiHijkX18c3VpKGg4vLJ6Twjh" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, tony@att.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] interesting author in: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:47:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --G2qK7h0gsiHijkX18c3VpKGg4vLJ6Twjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, the author information extraction code doesn't know what to do with this: INTERNET-DRAFT Jayantheesh S B Intended status: Standards Track Samsung Expires: April, 2016 Narendra Singh Bisht Samsung October 08, 2015 and no xml file was provided. Is Jayantheesh the given or family name? Are "S" and "B" initials? If so, why the swapped order without comma, and why no point after each of the initials? If I can't figure out how to handle that, I can't write code to do it eit= her... :-( Henrik On 2015-10-12 21:49, Tony Hansen wrote: > Note the authors in this I-D announcement. Something messed up somewher= e. >=20 > Tony Hansen >=20 >=20 > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [imapext] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt > Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:04:39 -0700 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > CC: imapext@ietf.org >=20 >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts dire= ctories. > This draft is a work item of the IMAP APPEND Extensions Working Group = of the IETF. >=20 > Title : The IMAP APPENDLIMIT Extension > Authors : Samsung Telecommunications America > Narendra Singh Bisht > Filename : draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt > Pages : 7 > Date : 2015-10-07 >=20 > Abstract: > This memo defines an extension to the IMAP service whereby a server can= > advertise its capability, to support maximum mail upload size using > CAPABILITY, STATUS and LIST commands. >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extens= ion/ >=20 > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-0= 4 >=20 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-ext= ension-04 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submi= ssion > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > imapext mailing list > imapext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --G2qK7h0gsiHijkX18c3VpKGg4vLJ6Twjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWHTW2AAoJEE6bV0uPuxcakMIP/RowdsOPCHipkEbFB+yiMl8/ aVJSgYAV+NGqZbIFOwfFlduQp7bJB1smACVPUjuAWBHnckqT4q3EcEWWnHenjbw7 KJS0DJH/WhR7QfmPIkOq4CGF29HSj5KlxnPTBiUeJ47+Aa5hsJVKOTdqY2va9dcg W+1tPkRZuxcZqfCTDM9DaxsoQ09+fFzIWUqSP0YQJ6TodHm5erXvND4iJf/+JZfJ ATirsRsoPdOxdSpm8Ag6UWKWeLSPSmcQz/wWi32iFVybsla2SMa5hNx5sMNEVZsa RdleMPOGK/XDLuTQg9F68kGES8ZQtD5CLQOPhcP+E/sLytauO48cTvrW6OcI5XHh tgM/Va+t5ov0Y4j5E5VjBnEhDVtwOQDlY7zjTojGhNJKr9B77Hu73Bvod2uxhMFL M/+eG1dzmAIslSxp9J+7Edqi2m251kwPdPAAdi+Gqmy1HkCP/+Mwnu1IEeR1RJ2p GS4IRgfz0K/qPDfpEbAsFA2Q/SJQAtnfZk7AME++QmavzYMdWeZPW0dr0Uzqti/w eTRgy+BZpPmxBFlHy5VFU+A1eBrVh3EdR/PFTkBbIPTY2YXrCboe+XBrTM96oRUF bUTOsBHK7ri5A8aknK9k94V9K5ELGlbhpzYBZjpnWUxm6eau6GT5qU8eZ5icTa4e MlBX1NYRCOKrFE17uEbg =GA+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G2qK7h0gsiHijkX18c3VpKGg4vLJ6Twjh-- From nobody Tue Oct 13 13:16:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D39C1A8A84 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:16:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iy_kRO0nnxtl for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0921A8A80 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so98863775igb.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wM9jOqSRZxWP1NlsVje0uung0UdreODt7dnYcVXemic=; b=saMiBQbn6lndD5/cXq5/P8ATJwGjUN5fx5GlgOXMdfgPh8UpqmQ69DaLsGB+ysyskM VumtHGHgbKCTobpFdtu2PzOJipJi6uvA8zwVmDwQEpbJxk/NIvTZMqy0dNtEBIebC06S BOv+cLBeRJykIocJJhCy6g3RU6ge2+gPvhCIIX12fqGdTVvZdoe6n90lvdViKoa5ThE8 bXl5TxQwMvUCFQ3v3/fZl+bKQfJ+Hk+G5nf9z0Nk1TWbFJO5Nor82T4KHJwG73DKaEL6 k1ogmBsHRewnljBuuKzZDX8zLiyse84bjXkkLNYdb6HFVoxrOCI86HZILtDW+tYBf36j 4drA== X-Received: by 10.50.124.8 with SMTP id me8mr12126142igb.92.1444767356997; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from still.local ([184.13.114.26]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c17sm2250189ioc.0.2015.10.13.13.15.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT) To: Henrik Levkowetz , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <561A86BA.8030301@gmail.com> <561ABB5F.2080204@levkowetz.com> From: Tim Wicinski Message-ID: <561D667B.9060402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:15:55 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561ABB5F.2080204@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.13.02 feedback X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:16:00 -0000 Henrik You're right. I had been just working on an addition to 6598 (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303) and had it on my brain in the wrong way. Now that I've gone back in the light of day, I was mistaken. Thanks for catching it. tim On 10/11/15 3:41 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On 2015-10-11 17:56, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> Hi >> >> The tools makes mention of "non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4 addresses" in >> one of the checks. >> But 5735 has been updated by 6598. this should be updated. > > Umm. 6598 specifies the allocation of a /10 (100.64.0.0/10) for use > in carrier-grade NATs, but that doesn't make this range suitable for > example use in IDs and RFCs, from what I can see? The addresses which > idnits warns about are addresses which don't fall into the ranges > specified by 5735 for documentation and example use, and I don't see > that this has changed? > > Best regards, > > Henrik > > From nobody Wed Oct 14 10:29:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A84C1ACEF8 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFuEyM-I_9cU for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A45031ACEF4 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9EHTfi5004779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:41 -0700 To: Brian E Carpenter , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <53E6B1B5.70607@gmail.com> From: Dave Crocker Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking Message-ID: <561E9102.5030401@dcrocker.net> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53E6B1B5.70607@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] pre-WG wiki? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:29:44 -0000 On 8/9/2014 4:41 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I should know this but I don't: is it possible to set up > a wiki for pre-WG discussions (with the option that it > morphs into a WG wiki if the WG is approved)? This request seems to be getting increasingly common. FWIW, I recently suggested that setting up a pre-wg mailing list should have the same surrounding collaboration tools support as a working group. I think that reduces to /always/ establishing a homepage and a wiki as companions to the mailing list. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net From nobody Fri Oct 16 09:01:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0581B32AE for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ElYE8KuocgpD for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D781B32E3 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iodv82 with SMTP id v82so128484036iod.0 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kVl1r/xt3yNXetm3FLWDE4BvOWIyLlpcqtslRsLBtpI=; b=LFLtDy12ZhhfeCxgZWSJLnhQcV1sKvSeQGC/er5OgItvJrzNUjvdl2PX2CjW/y+7Lr Kc4OSSy9NN8xdf/Gz47w4oaxy9Rw+9lIiX/ZVqCFJebEcSInJZGlmbF2TZAA401nB6iD DOZ3vBt6HMSNLrUFKsI8jVVdz9KNGs9inhmSb5m//P0l+ld792cUog11oT3IigbjXqJU 7EJSKyPveDcAVHqBQXHAdPh8kHBI9/c9Hxq0R6F7i7MfWCSxt/0oO4j/NZUtbdqmLSZS wzP6frJr280KBMfn0MEfSma/nyfJnpRZyFmuaxVcoE/QUNTfkp/CBRzcE5kYgaupOY2P dFEQ== X-Received: by 10.107.17.88 with SMTP id z85mr5314810ioi.97.1445011290358; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from still.local ([184.13.114.26]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i26sm8235414iod.27.2015.10.16.09.01.28 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:29 -0700 (PDT) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: Tim Wicinski Message-ID: <56211F55.3000103@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:01:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Possible bug in datatracker mail handling X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:01:41 -0000 I went to approve a renamed draft for submission into DNSOP and this error popped up: An error occured while sending email: Subject: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns replacement status set during submit by Lee Howard To: , , , Cc: [no cc] The following recipients were refused: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns@ietf.org: (550, '5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table') ---- From nobody Fri Oct 16 09:11:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341E1A01FC for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9BvxsS_B5jE for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B621A01AE for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9GGBO4b060234 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:11:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <56211F55.3000103@gmail.com> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <562121A7.3050705@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:11:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56211F55.3000103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Possible bug in datatracker mail handling X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:11:26 -0000 Yes - it's a race condition. (the aliases aren't in place quickly enough). We'll address it. RjS On 10/16/15 11:01 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > I went to approve a renamed draft for submission into DNSOP and this > error popped up: > > > An error occured while sending email: > Subject: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns replacement status set during > submit by Lee Howard > To: , , > , > Cc: [no cc] > > The following recipients were refused: > draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns@ietf.org: (550, '5.1.1 > : > Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table') > ---- > From nobody Sat Oct 17 05:12:19 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F111B29F9; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38TBO65--xCW; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx142.netapp.com (mx142.netapp.com [216.240.21.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78091B29F7; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:12:16 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,692,1437462000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="71263178" Received: from hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.37]) by mx142-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2015 05:11:10 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:11:10 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::e1d9:911e:3048:d510%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:11:09 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: The IESG , "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: draft-irtf-cfrg-curves approved but no email? Thread-Index: AQHRCNToNGN87JornUC7f2Ph/n3AKg== Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:11:09 +0000 Message-ID: <40752AFA-F2C1-4C9C-8C2A-4D1B2BD92C51@netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.36] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D9DFAF93-CE7E-4FF9-B613-BA834CDDE09D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: IRSG , "draft-irtf-cfrg-curves@ietf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" Subject: [Tools-discuss] draft-irtf-cfrg-curves approved but no email? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:12:18 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D9DFAF93-CE7E-4FF9-B613-BA834CDDE09D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, the top history entry for this ID says on = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-curves/history/= : "2015-10-15 00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to = Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation" However, I didn't see any such email, although irsg@irtf.org is in the = "send notices to" list. And searching my email folders, I can't find one = now either. Did an email get lost on my side, or is this an issue with the = datatracker? Lars --Apple-Mail=_D9DFAF93-CE7E-4FF9-B613-BA834CDDE09D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBViI63NZcnpRveo1xAQi22AQAjqqjbKyzPyrqK4cqycrvvRLvhLXQlcA6 nYvuH8y4O/t1GkrRnynnGR84xmSsx1r3XfzAnZkaosa6B/1q/cHiBLa6nX0OKnEe E9z/Pn8ihsaNfrPPtsVxeWwbSNlYylifLTKJx74F2GcXCNwD/npWd3YBQ2fM5/59 UovD/ZIDQMg= =hgly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D9DFAF93-CE7E-4FF9-B613-BA834CDDE09D-- From nobody Sat Oct 17 05:13:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F4F1B2A01; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:13:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UoTb6stDInFt; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx142.netapp.com (mx142.netapp.com [216.240.21.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94CEB1B29FB; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,692,1437462000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="71263270" Received: from hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.41]) by mx142-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::e1d9:911e:3048:d510%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:12:40 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: The IESG , "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: draft-irtf-cfrg-curves approved but no email? Thread-Index: AQHRCNToy+xXNNhcH0u41rz+PwWhzZ5wDeeA Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:12:39 +0000 Message-ID: <28CEBA1C-66EF-4FF8-9A53-86F595722070@netapp.com> References: <40752AFA-F2C1-4C9C-8C2A-4D1B2BD92C51@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <40752AFA-F2C1-4C9C-8C2A-4D1B2BD92C51@netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.36] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A5161AD5-0019-49B5-9BC9-8BAE6DB87DE6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: IRSG , "draft-irtf-cfrg-curves@ietf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] draft-irtf-cfrg-curves approved but no email? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:13:42 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A5161AD5-0019-49B5-9BC9-8BAE6DB87DE6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Oh: "to be sent" !" "sent" I need to wake up. Related question: why the delay between the approval and the = announcement? Lars On 2015-10-17, at 14:11, Eggert, Lars wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > the top history entry for this ID says on = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-curves/history/= : >=20 > "2015-10-15 00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to = Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation" >=20 > However, I didn't see any such email, although irsg@irtf.org is in the = "send notices to" list. And searching my email folders, I can't find one = now either. >=20 > Did an email get lost on my side, or is this an issue with the = datatracker? >=20 > Lars --Apple-Mail=_A5161AD5-0019-49B5-9BC9-8BAE6DB87DE6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBViI7NdZcnpRveo1xAQiN7QP/YMv0gdpjoD86ob1ucycfBkwFrj5KOrry eXxbX5rNTziABqwi2M5Y70KfyxvAMPGgbJYw4i2uYa6BEHnrEiOqiMt2ogToizzI ova5B+HSucSnqBFq4HcR7gZ5Ev4hlam1nW2Rqdlwv6HeWqZYSz/yEtkiJCrr+aIG YiwFRaPFrh0= =Jr5F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A5161AD5-0019-49B5-9BC9-8BAE6DB87DE6-- From nobody Sat Oct 17 05:22:34 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBB91B2A23; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:22:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.311 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6pU1R4GRfhx; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 272BA1B2A0F; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 05:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C88BED9; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:22:24 +0100 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EjrtnHbKqJy; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:22:23 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [86.42.31.61]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3152BEC9; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:22:22 +0100 (IST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1445084543; bh=wP7OsGF0JXL2mY75bZgjB3TLRJj4luEOQGILV2kcDLg=; h=To:Cc:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=O0+qTu6FBXQjCfrCarcvFPgR+jWxYcLI0nPZjegNEJQqNOtcdgVlbyAECdzQXe77Y /pAhrhOeADwPFGRswVCguIxXbP6oeRgeqw/7ojCVpOEkEfhx3FciXY35llGeCIO9nJ od7irehnpTYWVL6AupOMWRL15oLTbLgUIgemXBJk= X-Priority: 3 To: lars@netapp.com From: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie In-Reply-To: <40752AFA-F2C1-4C9C-8C2A-4D1B2BD92C51@netapp.com> References: <40752AFA-F2C1-4C9C-8C2A-4D1B2BD92C51@netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:22:19 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-irtf-cfrg-curves@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, irsg@irtf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [irsg] draft-irtf-cfrg-curves approved but no email? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:22:30 -0000 VGhvc2UgYXJlIHVzdWFsbHkgZG9uZSBvbiBNb25kYXkgSSB0aGluay4NCg0KUy4NCg0KT24gU2F0 IE9jdCAxNyAxMzoxMTowOSAyMDE1IEdNVCswMTAwLCBFZ2dlcnQsIExhcnMgd3JvdGU6DQo+IEhp LA0KPiANCj4gdGhlIHRvcCBoaXN0b3J5IGVudHJ5IGZvciB0aGlzIElEIHNheXMgb24gaHR0cHM6 Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvY29uZmxpY3QtcmV2aWV3LWlydGYtY2ZyZy1jdXJ2 ZXMvaGlzdG9yeS86DQo+IA0KPiAiMjAxNS0xMC0xNQkwMAlDaW5keSBNb3JnYW4JQ29uZmxpY3Qg UmV2aWV3IFN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gQXBwcm92ZWQgTm8gUHJvYmxlbSAtIGFubm91bmNlbWVu dCB0byBiZSBzZW50IGZyb20gSUVTRyBFdmFsdWF0aW9uIg0KPiANCj4gSG93ZXZlciwgSSBkaWRu J3Qgc2VlIGFueSBzdWNoIGVtYWlsLCBhbHRob3VnaCBpcnNnQGlydGYub3JnIGlzIGluIHRoZSAi c2VuZCBub3RpY2VzIHRvIiBsaXN0LiBBbmQgc2VhcmNoaW5nIG15IGVtYWlsIGZvbGRlcnMsIEkg Y2FuJ3QgZmluZCBvbmUgbm93IGVpdGhlci4NCj4gDQo+IERpZCBhbiBlbWFpbCBnZXQgbG9zdCBv biBteSBzaWRlLCBvciBpcyB0aGlzIGFuIGlzc3VlIHdpdGggdGhlIGRhdGF0cmFja2VyPw0KPiAN Cj4gTGFycw0KPg== From nobody Sun Oct 18 15:05:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FB51AD35D; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:05:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mvJxab0de9S; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth.a.painless.aa.net.uk (auth.a.painless.aa.net.uk [90.155.4.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416651AD35A; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 68.110.153.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.153.110.68] helo=[10.188.125.243]) by a.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Znw4e-0003IA-O8; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:05:06 +0100 To: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect.ad@ietf.org From: Elwyn Davies Message-ID: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:03:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Subject: [Tools-discuss] Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:05:11 -0000 Hi, Deborah. I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft (draft-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on a couple of weeks ago had been generated. You sent it for expert review back on 5 Oct and suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no apparent reason, has set the notify list to 'None' in the datatracker. Is there some good reason why this should happen that I am missing? Cheers, Elwyn From nobody Sun Oct 18 18:35:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA301B2B44 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:35:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHfifNwe-Wio for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7799A1B2B3A for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9J1Z3O1035901 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 20:35:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <562448C2.9030302@nostrum.com> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 20:34:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:35:07 -0000 Elwyn - With the 6.6.0 release, the way the tracker build where email was sent changed significantly. The new system includes most of what we were putting into the Notify field (things like the authors, chairs, and sheperds) automatically - those were cleaned out of the Notify field since they will be copied anyhow. In this document's case, that left the Notify field empty. Going forward, the notify field should only contain addresses that would not otherwise be automatically copied when mail is sent. To see where mail will be sent for a given action, look at the new "Email Expansions" tab (for the draft you mention, that's at ) btw - you weren't on the Notify list for the draft explicitly. See RjS On 10/18/15 5:03 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi, Deborah. > > I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft > (draft-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on > a couple of weeks ago had been generated. You sent it for expert > review back on 5 Oct and suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no > apparent reason, has set the notify list to 'None' in the > datatracker. Is there some good reason why this should happen that I > am missing? > > Cheers, > Elwyn > From nobody Wed Oct 21 07:49:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B2C1A036C; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:49:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiU38WW5wZ10; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CF71A0354; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9LEnUdF093564 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:49:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: "ietf@ietf.org" , Tools Team Discussion From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <5627A5F5.60403@nostrum.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:49:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] IMAP access to the list archives X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:32 -0000 The IMAP server providing access to the list archives is ready for use. You can find instructions for configuring clients at Please help improve the instructions for various clients at that wiki. The tools-discuss list (copied) is a good place to help each other with configuration and talk about the service. If you discover errors, please let me know. RjS From nobody Fri Oct 23 07:04:14 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18661A037F; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYv2Y3Wlo4Kk; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from b.painless.aa.net.uk (b.painless.aa.net.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30:5054:ff:fe5e:1643]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F101A033A; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brdgfw.folly.org.uk ([81.187.254.242] helo=[192.168.0.138]) by b.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Zpcwt-0003dU-Cl; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:04:03 +0100 To: Robert Sparks , "ietf@ietf.org" , Tools Team Discussion References: <5627A5F5.60403@nostrum.com> From: Elwyn Davies Message-ID: <562A3E50.50000@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:04:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5627A5F5.60403@nostrum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] IMAP access to the list archives X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:04:10 -0000 Plaudits: This seems to work pretty well via Thunderbird. The setup instructions worked as expected. Possible bug: The only issue that I have encountered is that the 'discuss' list has only displayed a small fraction of the messages that are on the list. Loading stopped after 1084 messages - the most recent one loaded is Message ID <47C71F0B.5030000@dcrocker.net> dated 2008/02/28. Hitting 'Get messages' doens't help. The other lists that I have subscribed to worked as expected and downloaded up to 21920 messages (ipv6). Possible bug/infelicity: In the process of trying to get the discuss mail downloaded, I tried 'compacting' the mailbox. Thunderbird reported that the operation had failed and the server had replied 'Internal Error'. Setup suggestion: In order to make it easier to reply to messages that one accesses via the IMAP server, it seems to be sensible to set the email address associated with the imap.ietf.org account to be the email address that one normally uses to send email to IETF lists (probably the same one as you use to login to the IETF tools. This certainly seems to work OK in Thunderbird which doesn't have a problem with two accounts being associated with the same email address. Regards, Elwyn On 21/10/2015 15:49, Robert Sparks wrote: > The IMAP server providing access to the list archives is ready for use. > > You can find instructions for configuring clients at > > > Please help improve the instructions for various clients at that wiki. > The tools-discuss list (copied) is a good place to help each other > with configuration and talk about the service. > > If you discover errors, please let me know. > > RjS > > > From nobody Fri Oct 23 12:55:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C961A8AB1; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:55:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BzKwNK9o4q0n; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8010A1A8AAF; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-164-199-31.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.164.199.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9NJoB6F036225 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:50:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-164-199-31.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.164.199.31] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: Elwyn Davies , "ietf@ietf.org" , Tools Team Discussion References: <5627A5F5.60403@nostrum.com> <562A3E50.50000@dial.pipex.com> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <562A8F6E.5090307@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:50:06 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <562A3E50.50000@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] IMAP access to the list archives X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:55:18 -0000 Thanks for the reports. I'll follow up with you directly to see what's happening to you on the discuss list (I just verified I get the whole thing when setting up a new account). RjS On 10/23/15 9:04 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Plaudits: > This seems to work pretty well via Thunderbird. The setup > instructions worked as expected. > > Possible bug: > The only issue that I have encountered is that the 'discuss' list has > only displayed a small fraction of the messages that are on the list. > Loading stopped after 1084 messages - the most recent one loaded is > Message ID <47C71F0B.5030000@dcrocker.net> dated 2008/02/28. Hitting > 'Get messages' doens't help. The other lists that I have subscribed to > worked as expected and downloaded up to 21920 messages (ipv6). > > Possible bug/infelicity: > In the process of trying to get the discuss mail downloaded, I tried > 'compacting' the mailbox. Thunderbird reported that the operation had > failed and the server had replied 'Internal Error'. > > Setup suggestion: > In order to make it easier to reply to messages that one accesses via > the IMAP server, it seems to be sensible to set the email address > associated with the imap.ietf.org account to be the email address that > one normally uses to send email to IETF lists (probably the same one > as you use to login to the IETF tools. This certainly seems to work OK > in Thunderbird which doesn't have a problem with two accounts being > associated with the same email address. > > Regards, > Elwyn > > On 21/10/2015 15:49, Robert Sparks wrote: >> The IMAP server providing access to the list archives is ready for use. >> >> You can find instructions for configuring clients at >> >> >> Please help improve the instructions for various clients at that wiki. >> The tools-discuss list (copied) is a good place to help each other >> with configuration and talk about the service. >> >> If you discover errors, please let me know. >> >> RjS >> >> >> > From nobody Sat Oct 31 16:41:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7EF1A0370; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:21:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.266 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7BsVP-zDLAH; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5111A0387; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049463.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t9JCJaMo048780; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:21:15 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xkjq6nsqq-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:21:14 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JCLE75020359; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:21:14 -0400 Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JCL5Po020268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:21:09 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.152]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:20:59 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.90]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAH.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:20:58 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: Elwyn Davies Thread-Topic: Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? Thread-Index: AQHRCfEUhWKv1CryUECvo/REra5R0p5yvVYr Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:20:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4FC72923-F928-4FA8-92FA-8BEE3BCE0B4E@att.com> References: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-10-19_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1510190210 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:41:25 -0700 Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect.ad@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:21:21 -0000 Hi Elwyn, Not that I know of - must be with the automated mailing list generated by d= ata tracker. I'll check later if I am able to edit. Thanks- Deborah Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >=20 > Hi, Deborah. >=20 > I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft (draft-tea= s-rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on a couple of wee= ks ago had been generated. You sent it for expert review back on 5 Oct and= suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no apparent reason, has set the notify = list to 'None' in the datatracker. Is there some good reason why this shou= ld happen that I am missing? >=20 > Cheers, > Elwyn From nobody Sat Oct 31 16:41:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC48B1A1A12; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjwqgEs7i8RT; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7FD1A1A1E; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so137116131obb.1; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vUGmVZa6m5egG2om3pWJjpnuOCyK02spLjQoMNkaV0c=; b=QTQZ2Yh8OOMUcbLpZTdGZW7DORHiYaz4qdEG/AWSEiwhNwEM7z810kdsQbxVifRQRl goyzXF8TeHiCjUH6qKbywWbOJc+iOih6GV32S5w6kn8TIzKWy+j56KSVSzm9XLxeAwXu YwlSsJg6W44YO+ECAX/gw0bwAZhHS47qGxnUAQedHou6KdtRpv0LVaih40i7mC/VCptg l4biRnEumBSGRZyUb7XRVhRGx6ZE/rfMUgp/aedRJuAEv6lMuKk+ngTsNmNvcJ0OIprB R7RlXUcBoAkDKBYmfBbPLdAh1iIKRSyfjdyNODXIyERDujl0+8Un8qLLQ7r++EfldFiR vLHA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.76.42 with SMTP id h10mr7621911oew.13.1445258115501; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.121.74 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> References: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alia Atlas To: Elwyn Davies Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d90695554d052274605c Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:41:25 -0700 Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect.ad@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:35:18 -0000 --047d7b33d90695554d052274605c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Elwyn, The tools changed so that the authors, shepherd, chairs, and ADs are automatically notified. Now the notify field is for others who are interested (such as yourself). I believe that the pruning was done removing the names that would be automatically sent to - but the WG chairs and ADs were also notified of the changes. Thanks for your work as a GenArt reviewer and your diligence in following up. Regards, Alia On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi, Deborah. > > I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft > (draft-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on a > couple of weeks ago had been generated. You sent it for expert review back > on 5 Oct and suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no apparent reason, has set > the notify list to 'None' in the datatracker. Is there some good reason > why this should happen that I am missing? > > Cheers, > Elwyn > --047d7b33d90695554d052274605c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Elwyn,

The tools changed so that the= authors, shepherd, chairs, and ADs are automatically notified.
N= ow the notify field is for others who are interested (such as yourself).=C2= =A0 I believe that the
pruning was done removing the names that w= ould be automatically sent to - but the WG
chairs and ADs were al= so notified of the changes.

Thanks for your work a= s a GenArt reviewer and your diligence in following up.

Regards,
Alia

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
Hi, Deborah.

I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft (draft-teas-= rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on a couple of weeks= ago had been generated.=C2=A0 You sent it for expert review back on 5 Oct = and suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no apparent reason, has set the noti= fy list to 'None' in the datatracker.=C2=A0 Is there some good reas= on why this should happen that I am missing?

Cheers,
Elwyn

--047d7b33d90695554d052274605c-- From nobody Sat Oct 31 16:41:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6891A92ED; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 07:55:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.266 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-zGslqE41Zl; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 07:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7A51A924A; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 07:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049461.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049461.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t9JEngho002971; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:54:15 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049461.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xkgtygsg8-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:54:15 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JEsEFi011289; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:54:15 -0400 Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JEs67W011118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:54:08 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.151]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:53:55 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.90]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:53:54 -0400 From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" To: Elwyn Davies Thread-Topic: Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? Thread-Index: AQHRCfEUhWKv1CryUECvo/REra5R0p5yvVYrgAApD7A= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:53:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56241717.9080102@dial.pipex.com> <4FC72923-F928-4FA8-92FA-8BEE3BCE0B4E@att.com> In-Reply-To: <4FC72923-F928-4FA8-92FA-8BEE3BCE0B4E@att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.16.234.230] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-10-19_13:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1510190253 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:41:25 -0700 Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect.ad@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify list to 'None'? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:55:40 -0000 Hi Elwyn, Not sure why it defaulted to "None", but I was able to edit it so fixed it = to draft.all which seems better than "None" as I don't think "None" will be= much help with having a discussion unless Avri has a reindeer with that na= me:-) Much thanks for bringing to my attention- Deborah -----Original Message----- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A=20 Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 8:21 AM To: Elwyn Davies Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect.ad@ietf.org; tools-discuss@ietf.or= g Subject: Re: Is there a good reason why the 'system' changed the Notify lis= t to 'None'? Hi Elwyn, Not that I know of - must be with the automated mailing list generated by d= ata tracker. I'll check later if I am able to edit. Thanks- Deborah Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 18, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >=20 > Hi, Deborah. >=20 > I was just checking back to see if a new version of this draft (draft-tea= s-rsvp-te-srlg-collect) that I had done a gen-art review on a couple of wee= ks ago had been generated. You sent it for expert review back on 5 Oct and= suddenly on 14 Oct the system, for no apparent reason, has set the notify = list to 'None' in the datatracker. Is there some good reason why this shou= ld happen that I am missing? >=20 > Cheers, > Elwyn