From nobody Thu Aug 4 11:35:06 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9FA12D147 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:35:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.919 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyoxWlWW8X1L for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9307D12D0F1 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u74IXuAx007540 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:35:03 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 24maukrksn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:35:03 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u74IZ2ea031808 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:35:02 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u74IYuxG031648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:34:57 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.146]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:34:44 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCG.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.7.30]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.146]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:34:43 -0400 From: "HANSEN, TONY L" To: Tools-discuss Thread-Topic: svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org Thread-Index: AQHR7n7esSg5PgwKdkS2b6GgKVNbAw== Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:34:43 +0000 Message-ID: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.110.240.130] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_10E8B82F922F4D89BB2C71BAE8F76FD9attcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-08-04_11:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1608040200 Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 18:35:06 -0000 --_000_10E8B82F922F4D89BB2C71BAE8F76FD9attcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 QWJvdXQgYSBtb250aCBhZ28sIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnIHNlcnZlcnMgbW92 ZWQgYXJvdW5kIGEgYml0LiBJ4oCZbSBub3cgZ2V0dGluZyB0aGlzIGVycm9yIGluIG9uZSBvZiBt eSBzdm4gdHJlZXMuIEFueW9uZSBoYXZlIGEgY2x1ZSB3aGF0IEkgbmVlZCB0byBkbyB0byBmaXgg aXQ/DQoNCnN2biBsb2cNCnN2bjogRTE3MDAwMDogJ2h0dHA6Ly9zdm4udG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcv c3ZuL3Rvb2xzL3htbDJyZmMnIGlzbid0IGluIHRoZSBzYW1lIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkgYXMgJ2h0dHBz Oi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvc3ZuL3Rvb2xzL3htbDJyZmMnDQoNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBU b255IEhhbnNlbg0K --_000_10E8B82F922F4D89BB2C71BAE8F76FD9attcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <1D30EF085E45244C8BABC6D8CA1A2317@LOCAL> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6bz0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6b2ZmaWNlIiB4 bWxuczp3PSJ1cm46c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOm9mZmljZTp3b3JkIiB4bWxuczptPSJo dHRwOi8vc2NoZW1hcy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL29mZmljZS8yMDA0LzEyL29tbWwiIHhtbG5zPSJo dHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy9UUi9SRUMtaHRtbDQwIj4NCjxoZWFkPg0KPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVp dj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9dXRmLTgiPg0KPG1l dGEgbmFtZT0iVGl0bGUiIGNvbnRlbnQ9IiI+DQo8bWV0YSBuYW1lPSJLZXl3b3JkcyIgY29udGVu dD0iIj4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRvciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUg KGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxlPjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8N CkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0 IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJ cGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWls eTpNZW5sbzsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgOSAzIDggNCAyIDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZp bml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXtt YXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7fQ0KYTpsaW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28t c3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6IzA1NjNDMTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5k ZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5 bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6Izk1NEY3MjsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJs aW5lO30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTE3DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLWNvbXBv c2U7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsNCgljb2xvcjp3aW5kb3d0ZXh0O30NCnNwYW4ubXNv SW5zDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5Ow0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOiIiOw0K CXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7DQoJY29sb3I6dGVhbDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVs dA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpO30N CkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4g MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9u MTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgYmdjb2xvcj0id2hpdGUiIGxhbmc9IkVO LVVTIiBsaW5rPSIjMDU2M0MxIiB2bGluaz0iIzk1NEY3MiI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJXb3JkU2Vj dGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4w cHQiPkFib3V0IGEgbW9udGggYWdvLCBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyBzZXJ2ZXJz IG1vdmVkIGFyb3VuZCBhIGJpdC4gSeKAmW0gbm93IGdldHRpbmcgdGhpcyBlcnJvciBpbiBvbmUg b2YgbXkgc3ZuIHRyZWVzLiBBbnlvbmUgaGF2ZSBhIGNsdWUgd2hhdCBJIG5lZWQgdG8gZG8gdG8g Zml4IGl0Pw0KPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0Ij48bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0idGV4dC1hdXRvc3BhY2U6 bm9uZSI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQiPiZuYnNwOzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJ0ZXh0LWF1dG9zcGFjZTpub25l Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpNZW5sbyI+c3ZuIGxv Zzwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdCI+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+ PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9InRleHQtYXV0b3NwYWNlOm5vbmUiPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5Ok1lbmxvO2NvbG9yOiMzODAw RkYiPnN2bjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpN ZW5sbyI+OiBFMTcwMDAwOiAnPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3N2bi50b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9zdm4v dG9vbHMveG1sMnJmYyI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOiMwQjRDQjQiPmh0dHA6Ly9zdm4udG9v bHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvc3ZuL3Rvb2xzL3htbDJyZmM8L3NwYW4+PC9hPicNCiBpc24ndCBpbiB0aGUg c2FtZSByZXBvc2l0b3J5IGFzICc8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL3N2bi90 b29scy94bWwycmZjIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6IzBCNENCNCI+aHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5p ZXRmLm9yZy9zdm4vdG9vbHMveG1sMnJmYzwvc3Bhbj48L2E+Jzwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdCI+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9InRleHQtYXV0b3NwYWNlOm5vbmUiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 MTEuMHB0Ij4mbmJzcDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdCI+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5i c3A7Jm5ic3A7IFRvbnkgSGFuc2VuPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0 Ij48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_10E8B82F922F4D89BB2C71BAE8F76FD9attcom_-- From nobody Thu Aug 4 12:22:16 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CE612D748 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id suN1kBZgNSZm for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D9112D1EB for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mfilter42-d.gandi.net (mfilter42-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.172]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB66A80C8; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:22:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter42-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter42-d.gandi.net (mfilter42-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SN36Idi_r4ri; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:22:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 93.199.227.76 Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7E34C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.227.76]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50614A80D3; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57A395DE.9050702@tzi.org> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:22:06 +0200 From: Carsten Bormann User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "HANSEN, TONY L" References: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> In-Reply-To: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Cc: Tools-discuss Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 19:22:14 -0000 My subversion-foo is fading, but http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.switch.html or, more likely, http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.relocate.html may be of help. Grüße, Carsten From nobody Fri Aug 5 07:10:49 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AE912D848 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:10:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YN1eeZ6LeFKb for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83AD12D52F for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 07:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049462.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u75E9eXW029441; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:10:41 -0400 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 24mv8m07v9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:10:41 -0400 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u75EAems018679; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:10:41 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u75EAVlX018353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:10:37 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:10:19 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCG.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.7.30]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:10:19 -0400 From: "HANSEN, TONY L" To: Carsten Bormann Thread-Topic: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org Thread-Index: AQHR7n7esSg5PgwKdkS2b6GgKVNbA6A5cQkAgADzz4A= Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:10:18 +0000 Message-ID: <7D2089FF-F4A0-45EE-93C5-4ED61A6F4B1B@att.com> References: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> <57A395DE.9050702@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <57A395DE.9050702@tzi.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.110.240.69] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-08-05_10:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1608050173 Archived-At: Cc: Tools-discuss Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:10:48 -0000 VGhhbmsgeW91IENhcnN0ZW4uDQoNClR1cm5zIG91dCB0aGF0IHNpbXBseSBkb2luZyBhbiDigJxz dm4gdXBkYXRl4oCdIHNlZW1zIHRvIGZpeCB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbS4gRG9u4oCZdCBrbm93IHdoeTsg ZG9u4oCZdCBjYXJlIHdoeTsgYXMgbG9uZyBhcyBpdCB3b3Jrcy4g4pi6DQoNCglUb255DQoNCk9u IDgvNC8xNiwgMzoyMiBQTSwgIkNhcnN0ZW4gQm9ybWFubiIgPGNhYm9AdHppLm9yZz4gd3JvdGU6 DQoNCiAgICBNeSBzdWJ2ZXJzaW9uLWZvbyBpcyBmYWRpbmcsIGJ1dA0KICAgIA0KICAgIGh0dHA6 Ly9zdm5ib29rLnJlZC1iZWFuLmNvbS9lbi8xLjcvc3ZuLnJlZi5zdm4uYy5zd2l0Y2guaHRtbA0K ICAgIG9yLCBtb3JlIGxpa2VseSwNCiAgICBodHRwOi8vc3ZuYm9vay5yZWQtYmVhbi5jb20vZW4v MS43L3N2bi5yZWYuc3ZuLmMucmVsb2NhdGUuaHRtbA0KICAgIA0KICAgIG1heSBiZSBvZiBoZWxw Lg0KICAgIA0KICAgIEdyw7zDn2UsIENhcnN0ZW4NCiAgICANCg0K From nobody Fri Aug 5 08:20:47 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E0B12D575 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:20:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.934 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DB3b6QCZZhoF for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21B412D5BC for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resomta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.107]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id Vgv2b8WmOff8qVgvSbw1Oi; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:20:42 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.100.16.189]) by comcast with SMTP id VgvRbbbGc9pGIVgvSbff4B; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:20:42 +0000 Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u75FKftv009545; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:20:41 -0400 Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u75FKeYu009542; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:20:40 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) To: "HANSEN\, TONY L" In-Reply-To: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> (tony@att.com) Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 11:20:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87eg63b5tj.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCoXLEpYVR/6JY1/OXGK6Heuey4GbHN5umm9/STQDC71vculBHUgFCNHcE9pcBB0RvP1jPSXECK2z7QDKafkEjiWpmHjEWFyGzvgyQ18M3G+DzM7tDF0 mgkXwWVTSQ9K0aWEhDZv7DIPbXtK3gLf1LgfQdo7XC930xgzWvBhfqTh8Xh5gmGzV2xUmtylVOjyS+TJi1p8MdafgmmwoZxRWoM= Archived-At: Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:20:45 -0000 "HANSEN, TONY L" writes: > About a month ago, some of the tools.ietf.org servers moved around a > bit. I'm now getting this error in one of my svn trees. Anyone have a > clue what I need to do to fix it? > > svn log > svn: E170000: 'http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc' isn't in the same repository as 'https://tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc' What happened is that the URL at which the repository can be accessed has changed, and now doesn't match the URL recorded in your .svn. You relocate the working copy using the "svn switch" command. I've never really memorized it (as one uses it quite rarely). Check out the references that Tony mentioned, and of course, make a backup copy of your working tree before trying anything. Dale From nobody Fri Aug 5 09:25:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F0712D5F6 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:25:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTA2YfJ6Sluy for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D500612D508 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id ACCB252C40BE6 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:25:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u75GPjOc010833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:25:46 GMT Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u75GPjqY028400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:25:45 +0200 Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.89]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 18:25:45 +0200 From: "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Rfcstrip-1.03 feedback Thread-Index: AdHvNgP9CR/hc9hcQfCrJvlS5K71Uw== Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:25:45 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US Content-Language: it-IT X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B76FFD3BFR711WXCHMBA05z_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Rfcstrip-1.03 feedback X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:25:57 -0000 --_000_B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B76FFD3BFR711WXCHMBA05z_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Could you tell me how to use this tool in a Windows 7 environment? Do you h= ave some documentation to use it ? Thanks Regards Sergio --_000_B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B76FFD3BFR711WXCHMBA05z_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

Could you tell me how to use this tool in a Windows = 7 environment? Do you have some documentation to use it ?

 

Thanks

Regards

 

Sergio

 

 

--_000_B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B76FFD3BFR711WXCHMBA05z_-- From nobody Sat Aug 6 03:06:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D6C12D5A3 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:06:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93apgL0eaD6Q for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A52D12B016 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [217.28.10.119] (port=61856 helo=[10.89.121.84]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyTl-0006aa-CI; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: <57A5B653.2070607@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 12:05:07 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "HANSEN, TONY L" , Tools-discuss References: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> In-Reply-To: <10E8B82F-922F-4D89-BB2C-71BAE8F76FD9@att.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LLi1RJCQMeQsreQNFLRBGmTtwCV37jx8A" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.28.10.119 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, tony@att.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] svn error accessing svn.tools.ietf.org X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 10:06:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LLi1RJCQMeQsreQNFLRBGmTtwCV37jx8A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-08-04 20:34, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: > About a month ago, some of the tools.ietf.org servers moved around a > bit. I=E2=80=99m now getting this error in one of my svn trees. Anyone = have a > clue what I need to do to fix it? >=20 > svn log > svn: E170000: 'http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc' isn't in > the same repository as 'https://tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc' As indicated by Carsten and Dale, you should use the 'svn switch' command= =2E The change that caused this was forcing http to https. Best regards, Henrik on Linux Bier Wanderung --LLi1RJCQMeQsreQNFLRBGmTtwCV37jx8A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXpbZbAAoJEE6bV0uPuxca+OoP/ib0EyTgWv1/1iUJr0kXLI/h VEIDxh04ckzHRRcYaxcGXd+wcmgZGt2xy44y4SqN/ZBowPh0ttwotmO1bn3k18Fa kysbhT4Sb2TUzQQ54eJoQLC1pntASYPkV8DSKKEJsD6e+whAM7bCTOyGcL6DiwhC IZQSf9ahnmfzPWqhdIeELohfBqEE9cUXB6Wtlvmjqd+5QAjvsxWk5rLMnihWYd5R PtNYOg33hWQ/c3yeasRhxLVTGIVVfDgZg7suKBPLpBNTFbJrcHA4ram/LOZKSnPM CjoMsN6FA9158YS8CL6iOhufLzQoJ+11hDoT2zILvFjg/kQsgSn8ps3Ch5ZKRcoj Ax+omNcyaViXzgzuPEqP4oDfTRqmXn9hgd3/mBYzug8GVh9JFzcDxSrDpPf7+68o kGHJVXuUqONUjmwuOqQbQYQBeA5YEbWioOnhiBr9xGsSAdt8FwQ2+HgXjuq5usUh mQsSfd5/tFAQN+Ohm/3KEpqFGs78iMh5eAuA1WPFBmLUxCFotAh3BDRzzZkgFjhQ ukUTyluvVRnrduqYG+UrEOceOhhWLz48opPWV/RXfVURZTf99GbWGS5nE/kj57bq I258boNY96cupNB4T/wjllepmkCK2jhO4EgyqgM+udKYywz5bCATRHJz9XDHVImC yN3DEylBxg1YiYXn75T1 =WY3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LLi1RJCQMeQsreQNFLRBGmTtwCV37jx8A-- From nobody Sat Aug 6 08:19:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7FD12D1C8 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:19:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNI0-4V-3qWG for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614E412D1A6 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [217.28.10.119] (port=62853 helo=[10.89.121.84]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1bW3NU-0006IN-BR; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:19:10 -0700 Message-ID: <57A5FFE9.7020505@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:19:05 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lGsK58DJCDID4fsBtI9dF1d8vH1s7B7UE" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.28.10.119 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, sergio.belotti@nokia.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Rfcstrip-1.03 feedback X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:19:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lGsK58DJCDID4fsBtI9dF1d8vH1s7B7UE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sergio, On 2016-08-05 18:25, Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT) wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Could you tell me how to use this tool in a Windows 7 environment? Do > you have some documentation to use it ? In order to use this in a windows environment, you must make sure that you have a unix shell available. I don't know what the best option for getting a shell on a windows box is today; but a docker image with linux should work. Documentation is abysmally absent; there's a one line description here: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcstrip/about For what do you need it? Pherhaps I could suggest some other way to accomplish what you want? Best regards, Henrik --lGsK58DJCDID4fsBtI9dF1d8vH1s7B7UE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXpf/qAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaKIwP+wfbLE+hks1NrpsYxeajjy5/ VS5K6sqoAUzqrHZWK4JYXV8P5IwE2QkL8IeMN1XevRWvmrU0okzzNYUoHHVhXb9H DTjiNrzW3OffkjimVMtqofCfKjah4e+q1Hp/9nPlTWkW+exQ48uDeacvTRBYYamL /FOuR79WotKuxCdp4aQT7NLBvf1vTEKNA8c8woLVBWTLfTIxr37jmPwERHxDYtes MqtbDT3JXJevmmsU36cYcC0BvTrEI6xbSwxOWAFjq8/oJ19yUdQ96Sz8Ase2yjzb noq0jzPAk/qP22KsMOv+u24eijwJ5Nu4QN6/9qlu7pi221XM9w/F+ySAsRMfPa6X nPy74xyhEXx83WfE+Qqjs24IKDXHj2WTKKjYvKX5mK193szvFWVnH4gpU/veFqB9 S06/z3ioLy6dAecbNGgmDFWKEfna9HrvBwVpK/j6utV3gJBnhUuAs8zU/8u61Ana nyzozg9xghOXn1zfV73xucV//1aKk1xYg2+NQ/MNcVFnSKx5tNLDcrVtiJrd/Xdz 584/BWf+3kfR74QRcuJs/S63zUwKuIVx4iGaLtXbbPocr2yIKIgYMWL/g8EX1FjZ +nLqZCi43p49bq7hgQK3+320o78xOvFmd2LKGcGcIJj38tANHbuSnKK0qfbO8CMs qq8V62Klp7Tz9NRedU6T =qREk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lGsK58DJCDID4fsBtI9dF1d8vH1s7B7UE-- From nobody Mon Aug 8 09:11:37 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AED12D125 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:11:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.147 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5RNKWmMoKjw for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4745812B01B for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.45] (h126.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.126]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4DD347123 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:11:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc Blanchet" To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 12:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4E73D7F9-6ED7-4039-8342-72072EFF6110@viagenie.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_3AC80950-6E7C-4F42-BB4E-EA9B22CE0D1E_=" X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234) Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] timezone in summary of interim meeting requests X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:11:35 -0000 --=_MailMate_3AC80950-6E7C-4F42-BB4E-EA9B22CE0D1E_= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown hello, that summary below should include the timezone, since start time/date without timezone does not mean anything really. Regards, Marc. On 8 Aug 2016, at 11:48, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" wrote: > A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Marc > Blanchet. > > This request requires approval by the Transport Area Area Director > > The meeting can be approved here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2016-dtn-02 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Working Group Name: Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking > Area Name: Transport Area > Session Requester: Marc Blanchet > > Meeting Type: Virtual Meeting > > Session 1: > > Date: 2016-09-28 > Start Time: 10:00 > Duration: 02:00 > Remote Participation Information: > https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m598de4b27ad16ef35d6c7161f4daebc9 > Agenda Note: > > --------------------------------------------------------- --=_MailMate_3AC80950-6E7C-4F42-BB4E-EA9B22CE0D1E_= Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hello,
<enhancement_requested>
that summary below should include the timezone, since start time/date wi= thout timezone does not mean anything really.
</enhancement_requested>

Regards, Marc.

On 8 Aug 2016, at 11:48, "IETF Meeting Session Request To= ol" wrote:

A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by = Marc Blanchet.

This request requires approval by the Transport Area Area= Director

The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-= 2016-dtn-02

Working Group Name: Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking<= br> Area Name: Transport Area
Session Requester: Marc Blanchet

Meeting Type: Virtual Meeting

Session 1:

Date: 2016-09-28
Start Time: 10:00
Duration: 02:00
Remote Participation Information: https://ietf.webex.com/ie= tf/j.php?MTID=3Dm598de4b27ad16ef35d6c7161f4daebc9
Agenda Note:

--=_MailMate_3AC80950-6E7C-4F42-BB4E-EA9B22CE0D1E_=-- From nobody Mon Aug 8 09:27:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D812B012; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTqw4jkrxIwy; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B73C127077; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB94E28B0042; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55F11F8055; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:26:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Sandra Murphy X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B77C8D9-07A0-4A68-816C-54EE95711385"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:27:02 -0400 Message-Id: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Archived-At: Cc: sidr chairs , Sandra Murphy Subject: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:27:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_2B77C8D9-07A0-4A68-816C-54EE95711385 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 (Not sure this is appropriate email address to use. If not, being = directed to the right one would be great.) A new author is being added to an existing draft in the sidr working = group. The new author wants to submit a new version. A few years ago, I recall Warren Kumari in a similar situation = discovering that the submission process would not allow this. Easy to = see why, prevents all sorts of mischievous behavior. Is that still the case? New author can not submit new version? The workaround is to get an existing author to submit a new version with = the new author added. The new author thereafter has no difficulty = submitting subsequent versions. Right? =E2=80=94Sandy --Apple-Mail=_2B77C8D9-07A0-4A68-816C-54EE95711385 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXqLLWAAoJEHplpQeet0IZxjMP/03eLEGhXD3hItRRr0etxQsq akITgJlj+UIOxtD5pXRgB/LVLcaVOCJZKUf71sa62LqGWberu1hr8e7FLOhOkDrG xOQirZ6wUboyxAxjEik0t6QLgKjO4e3321bS8Z1jW5ecVY9YJAxrlITZw+VwjOts L7sMG2hcfy7QUcHS9bqytBnz5OB6Xos0W1zUwM0nBOELuvgYZdh1+mAl/JaEs3pH UcG4f+15+nurkbbSHxshFp9pK61IVnC9jX1fGqPxADciXazSUioqVKgXFNhYGcEc qqrV+b+ymeNzzqxJvUeme8bS16DxNvj1i0ka6lOaCetS41LiW8ZYe2+igcPCQa/F ztdr0wTZFnRQs0U+BmHz10IdDESFRT7HNLpYi4J06rdmTs0qCCNW4NI5A8KebGS6 DM2UhSt3ZHU5ZcPCf35xfVq6Yg5oNG35P3O8qxaMaI6Inyixb3Ojs203GfWZRNxw GMBqKotbcezSKpmZn5688HGIAJ0RLapksA+fR55EX4s16W4rXjYX4VSztXLyJGmd TspUFtfB6CqvU/qmMOhWqa63wA1w+2HjNxQ+OLZETLx3xkRzXpjmIdjx3C6k5gOO QEQyanospOH9N/51nRmMvOB5srYExiX9d6PSexheyiwpCWgaDrQQsVXgjQymqCwv R9qFmxOw/EXIAIuWC0SM =IOeg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_2B77C8D9-07A0-4A68-816C-54EE95711385-- From nobody Mon Aug 8 10:28:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B4012D670; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:28:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DixZtNl5Jstr; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A825612D85A; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v123so196096942qkh.3; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xuR5LLJ2QmWSEJAM5pMQrbXGTFrF+FpPtq8nnGT3Q/8=; b=qRn4AvW7lqz93W4xVy56T/DkiPz42ncYI1UzL9l8o4iJwG8ZqtUqCJDPzqGdHkt36F qVyJNrY7XgsBJWm277Qnp3kHge9NngW/dlndIvbldoEwFI6fLDQW+w/VFaQaYLHafR/p mEBbT77B1Uut+VY9GntEM8cYRixcNlgP2spIfqCBJZ9g+97Pj+m4M8pqHlFmdHafT05u 5AAIgBSZEJk5dHVwSBZqx/xEiEzrOS2ebEJI+PVuefwEHhI/bPOS4NQ1RiZkALwPyjLc K3pGEuI5bEWNphh3nHon3dK+2CH23jtuS2CYXEX8Dme9bNFwpgmcJl1LXx2pDhN5l4Xv uK7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xuR5LLJ2QmWSEJAM5pMQrbXGTFrF+FpPtq8nnGT3Q/8=; b=ehHLgd3fRYRk4JbmmdVOkpRiMy2R9FgBhNypmUk648w4tQHtvjQQL/bj+b8YRZ5dIs VxWVtUTSPPIgst8X5bpUFXzu+JBSUM2RAzKjGK8S3FETtWyMePT419+1xyRnwdERLbbW NxZaPE8G/hgd9Nl97EdV7ZlMnAeFcXLAosK3Jl1x3HYoKI/If66wqO3Q5aOY1huaiJhH rD9seoYkgFexktLqygbZq28bFuI/o5/jxZAeMSI7C+TK88QrgZLVA6tSje7EULwxJQMu XE689n8mgL68ctp6cOYispEOEnmG5PmifCXbGCJxV2sABfTH1S2PUj57hmBvkqJzWqg9 AVVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutqXGO69u8OaQseIeaiywErqRvdy1oq2ysRcMX7+M/7wmL2lGwCG/Bz978Ml8GUYw== X-Received: by 10.55.89.197 with SMTP id n188mr28469041qkb.60.1470676854351; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from twicinski-ltm.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.236.215]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 144sm18071204qkj.44.2016.08.08.10.20.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Aug 2016 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT) To: Sandra Murphy , tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> From: Tim Wicinski Message-ID: <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:20:52 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Cc: sidr chairs Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:28:30 -0000 On 8/8/16 12:27 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > (Not sure this is appropriate email address to use. If not, being directed to the right one would be great.) > > A new author is being added to an existing draft in the sidr working group. > > The new author wants to submit a new version. > > A few years ago, I recall Warren Kumari in a similar situation discovering that the submission process would not allow this. Easy to see why, prevents all sorts of mischievous behavior. > > Is that still the case? New author can not submit new version? > > The workaround is to get an existing author to submit a new version with the new author added. The new author thereafter has no difficulty submitting subsequent versions. Right? > > —Sandy > > > Yes, this happened to me recently and it is still the case. I think the AD has the magic button, if you can't find the authors. From nobody Mon Aug 8 13:24:57 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AD812D0CB for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfw4Dkq5AbR1 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC68E12B03F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id pp5so116758808pac.3 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=00b0CSqUsZtzoX0gTDpfzpY0dSiabwwgZLkylTmVEkA=; b=gpwdo3c8r9m1OCJ7WCk8HuyKyuisB1Ec/qA4FlPGAcp3FWYrqpLULzIgAJPz13HgSd 7nQyS4tYJYvcRZsOK4J/6eD5IQc3Ip1Qh3FCGpjzijZV/3PZwffMvaugnyQmih0wXGL0 4NHCja7PsRJoRuBWgwHbdhUXj7g78h+xHOGB1V4OMGMKyzwal1MHGM2fNFYXe8sZqWkE I7m3NRf3poppCCQ9ts1vbheYz0qibfvsFf4IXaE3FlpR4Hk8XDbFv9yQ9ralmJVWlifH t/XkTmcbLSpiz9nnl54o6HYvgdYwUnLRFzyczc5cdfQQn1x5FLl7zcnnK8shwPy7U1r6 lNxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=00b0CSqUsZtzoX0gTDpfzpY0dSiabwwgZLkylTmVEkA=; b=Uarwm0MtGSlbCOk4Xc+Et7pHBNeO0RxXAv/TqSWkyNUs9B9cBg8azDpWKaI14m8yX5 rY3fMHOMAMKgf1P9a1u8Q2ZcsREGx4X1K0z8Qw5opdeuNEzKfoqKL4C5SKQbwwowJzEy /v0ecjC7j1IGpDpb/5Ec5ufk4dxcWQWqcBqjVT/Jij1RbcslLR0RtQB+OgPJuUC+Rcfp 1NFm79q8kxV0xbbwED6zm4EllnS8GC+oxbvPDztyv+/oabk3NIyoVhMRfs7XMMd3O46F jmQA/+zUBwTovo+r2GZBmqk5dGEVx1wyXkoQAf7bzRBjCzCW6ZPN+UhOS9w/6rr6iT2q 1h3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvpRM0+Xoh54N3OTR7pvID4sHZBCs3mZ6x+R0D2u+G3U2pIytGdxTp1l5k3MJDcQA== X-Received: by 10.66.142.105 with SMTP id rv9mr46521004pab.33.1470687894129; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (169.216.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.216.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p75sm50140736pfa.71.2016.08.08.13.24.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:24:53 -0700 (PDT) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland Message-ID: <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:24:52 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:24:56 -0000 On 09/08/2016 05:20, Tim Wicinski wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 8/8/16 12:27 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: >> >> (Not sure this is appropriate email address to use. If not, being dir= ected to the right one would be great.) >> >> A new author is being added to an existing draft in the sidr working g= roup. >> >> The new author wants to submit a new version. >> >> A few years ago, I recall Warren Kumari in a similar situation discove= ring that the submission process would not allow this.=20 >> Easy to see why, prevents all sorts of mischievous behavior. >> >> Is that still the case? New author can not submit new version? >> >> The workaround is to get an existing author to submit a new version wi= th the new author added. The new author thereafter has >> no difficulty submitting subsequent versions. Right? >> >> =E2=80=94Sandy >> >> >> >=20 > Yes, this happened to me recently and it is still the case. I think the= AD has the magic button, if you can't find the authors. To be precise, the new author can submit the draft but only one of the pr= evious authors can confirm the submission (and only if their email address is st= ill working). And it's very necessary, to prevent hijacks, which have actuall= y happened once or twice. And it's very necessary that an AD can override, = in case of unusual circumstances. Brian From nobody Mon Aug 8 21:59:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2DF12D093 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:59:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 879TlwL4AqRQ for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1942C12B024 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id x72so1118233pfd.2 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:59:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FVjhsMiPsXKeL5z4T5Jg1QvJxFIbcrgYdRci3LQo5D4=; b=pIc/cYYVS3pJoddBwexlZfVYoAPpFF9chWPp7ML+uEZV1VGqIB+VzDZ9QQthuubvcU RixiplduX3Yk6FOvFETYc4C2EfWOgauW2ZrNFJqEDSeYzQr1PrhQ14UYqSwaKPtN+4AZ AMBJ9gTF1QxgX4wwPGjcBRtCMAnqM2ZuNUQZkaTiQxWIckWFhTao8IYfAJFoeIQLtO3K JJIL4Ble1HdumcGgo5jpFRaoBNtjJRXBjssa2K5oia4oJ1+GcBap0cgMQcSmMque3w0g cMjn81HOAhe2wEnlzDc7sLVrGaKNpiZFY0agriwTPJ6yryxeQeeqJRBvbHPmgFhlawB9 jeug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FVjhsMiPsXKeL5z4T5Jg1QvJxFIbcrgYdRci3LQo5D4=; b=NQaOlCbtwgETbihoyU4qMAddRhts6WdkbPOjaou4m2Gk+wmbcc3iwRdGFQxKYrutyj pb8dQybQ4h4G0JRWIdipnI2pXVbgg+h63xfHSzsxFlUPwfrQYSpgvC1LpOrmrs0yVdCM UrMoSRm8kdVy7awXkJRruLuEIZ96Ns1AKthPIYb7indtN+Fg6szNXeBgIhjAXwMqtaQE JiOfp4cwPOd5uUrCm01AESa0XWN9j8F29eAanvui153JqIdP0nVSYPFVC7Syjrav6RBm 7Ll3WWU0hWxgUgrXBcltLH9631RAR5PFiLQHaaG5qT3ymTnWYrxd3Vu3UQynWHdunWZc SyFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvsGh75vhuZOEPaduFtWuenVvdde5hW2keiupAFvYHxU4R3PFhxUO/ECeoRJUOONg== X-Received: by 10.98.64.193 with SMTP id f62mr168857704pfd.141.1470718768502; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7ab6:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7ab6:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p75sm51829936pfa.71.2016.08.08.21.59.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:59:27 -0700 (PDT) To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland Message-ID: <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:59:28 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 04:59:31 -0000 Follow up: The instructions at https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/tool-instructions= / are wrong on this point. They say: >> Post now =09 >>=20 >> Button to start the automated posting process with submitter authentic= ation. >> Once clicked, an email message will be sent to the submitter whose ema= il address >> was provided within the form. The submitter will need to open the emai= l message >> via his or her email application, and click the link provided in the m= essage body. That is not true. First, the confirmation message is sent to all authors.= Second, if it's not a 00 draft, that means all *previous* authors. If the submitter = is not a previous author of the draft, he or she will not receive the confirmation= =2E Regards Brian On 09/08/2016 08:24, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 09/08/2016 05:20, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> >> >> On 8/8/16 12:27 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: >>> >>> (Not sure this is appropriate email address to use. If not, being di= rected to the right one would be great.) >>> >>> A new author is being added to an existing draft in the sidr working = group. >>> >>> The new author wants to submit a new version. >>> >>> A few years ago, I recall Warren Kumari in a similar situation discov= ering that the submission process would not allow this.=20 >>> Easy to see why, prevents all sorts of mischievous behavior. >>> >>> Is that still the case? New author can not submit new version? >>> >>> The workaround is to get an existing author to submit a new version w= ith the new author added. The new author thereafter has >>> no difficulty submitting subsequent versions. Right? >>> >>> =E2=80=94Sandy >>> >>> >>> >> >> Yes, this happened to me recently and it is still the case. I think th= e AD has the magic button, if you can't find the authors. >=20 > To be precise, the new author can submit the draft but only one of the = previous > authors can confirm the submission (and only if their email address is = still > working). And it's very necessary, to prevent hijacks, which have actua= lly > happened once or twice. And it's very necessary that an AD can override= , in case > of unusual circumstances. >=20 > Brian >=20 From nobody Tue Aug 9 10:26:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C0512D62A for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:26:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.147 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prexWXE5xeGB for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9A612D128 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:26:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local ([173.57.161.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u79HQShi095593 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:26:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [173.57.161.14] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: tools-discuss@ietf.org References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:26:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:26:31 -0000 Thanks Brian. I've captured this as a spot to improve. RjS On 8/8/16 11:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Follow up: > > The instructions at https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/tool-instructions/ > are wrong on this point. They say: > >>> Post now >>> >>> Button to start the automated posting process with submitter authentication. >>> Once clicked, an email message will be sent to the submitter whose email address >>> was provided within the form. The submitter will need to open the email message >>> via his or her email application, and click the link provided in the message body. > That is not true. First, the confirmation message is sent to all authors. Second, if > it's not a 00 draft, that means all *previous* authors. If the submitter is not a > previous author of the draft, he or she will not receive the confirmation. > > Regards > Brian > > On 09/08/2016 08:24, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> On 09/08/2016 05:20, Tim Wicinski wrote: >>> >>> On 8/8/16 12:27 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: >>>> (Not sure this is appropriate email address to use. If not, being directed to the right one would be great.) >>>> >>>> A new author is being added to an existing draft in the sidr working group. >>>> >>>> The new author wants to submit a new version. >>>> >>>> A few years ago, I recall Warren Kumari in a similar situation discovering that the submission process would not allow this. >>>> Easy to see why, prevents all sorts of mischievous behavior. >>>> >>>> Is that still the case? New author can not submit new version? >>>> >>>> The workaround is to get an existing author to submit a new version with the new author added. The new author thereafter has >>>> no difficulty submitting subsequent versions. Right? >>>> >>>> —Sandy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, this happened to me recently and it is still the case. I think the AD has the magic button, if you can't find the authors. >> To be precise, the new author can submit the draft but only one of the previous >> authors can confirm the submission (and only if their email address is still >> working). And it's very necessary, to prevent hijacks, which have actually >> happened once or twice. And it's very necessary that an AD can override, in case >> of unusual circumstances. >> >> Brian >> From nobody Tue Aug 9 10:52:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE3612D833 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:52:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.867 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNBSV5wf61yB for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567A612D7CB for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6134D1E5A0C for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjcirYcqX2Wd for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.128.230] (unknown [50.248.196.145]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ECEF1E5A0A for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Ryan Cross Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4BDE7777-4CC2-4A06-B0D3-14F726E6D843" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:52:26 -0700 References: <4E73D7F9-6ED7-4039-8342-72072EFF6110@viagenie.ca> To: tools-discuss@ietf.org In-Reply-To: <4E73D7F9-6ED7-4039-8342-72072EFF6110@viagenie.ca> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] timezone in summary of interim meeting requests X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:52:29 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4BDE7777-4CC2-4A06-B0D3-14F726E6D843 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Marc, Thanks for the feedback. I=E2=80=99ve raised a ticket and should have = this addressed in the next release. In the future please use the =E2=80=9CReport a Bug=E2=80=9D link on the = Datatracker menu to report issues and request enhancements. Thanks, Ryan > On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Marc Blanchet = wrote: >=20 > hello, > > that summary below should include the timezone, since start time/date = without timezone does not mean anything really.=20 > >=20 > Regards, Marc. >=20 > On 8 Aug 2016, at 11:48, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" wrote: >=20 > A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Marc = Blanchet. >=20 > This request requires approval by the Transport Area Area Director >=20 > The meeting can be approved here: > = https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2016-dtn-02 = = > Working Group Name: Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking > Area Name: Transport Area > Session Requester: Marc Blanchet >=20 > Meeting Type: Virtual Meeting >=20 > Session 1: >=20 > Date: 2016-09-28 > Start Time: 10:00 > Duration: 02:00 > Remote Participation Information: = https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=3Dm598de4b27ad16ef35d6c7161f4daebc9= = > Agenda Note: >=20 > --=20 > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or > send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org --Apple-Mail=_4BDE7777-4CC2-4A06-B0D3-14F726E6D843 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hi Marc,

Thanks for the feedback.  I=E2=80=99ve raised a ticket = and should have this addressed in the next release.
In the future please use the =E2=80=9CReport a Bug=E2=80=9D = link on the Datatracker menu to report issues and request
enhancements.

Thanks,
Ryan

On = Aug 8, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:

hello,
<enhancement_requested>
that summary below should include the timezone, since start time/date = without timezone does not mean anything really.
</enhancement_requested>

Regards, = Marc.

On 8 Aug 2016, at 11:48, "IETF = Meeting Session Request Tool" wrote:

A new interim meeting = request has just been submitted by Marc Blanchet.

This request requires approval by the Transport Area Area = Director

The meeting can be approved = here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-20= 16-dtn-02

Working Group Name: = Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking
Area Name: Transport Area
Session Requester: Marc Blanchet

Meeting = Type: Virtual Meeting

Session 1:

Date: 2016-09-28
Start Time: 10:00
Duration: 02:00
Remote Participation Information: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=3Dm598de4b27ad16ef35d6c7= 161f4daebc9
Agenda Note:

--
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at = http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
or send email to = datatracker-project@ietf.org

Please report = tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org

= --Apple-Mail=_4BDE7777-4CC2-4A06-B0D3-14F726E6D843-- From nobody Tue Aug 9 19:17:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2AE12D901 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_UdUcUJeJJ4 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65C912D09D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D278A2009E; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B909D638BE; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:17:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Robert Sparks In-Reply-To: References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:17:28 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Robert Sparks wrote: > Thanks Brian. I've captured this as a spot to improve. It would be great, for WG documents, if the chairs could manually adjust the list of who must approve, and/or could see the pending approvals list and override. The usual reason to add a new active author is because the old ones... became lame. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBV6qOsoCLcPvd0N1lAQLGnAf/c+C21m2Lv9XI7VdBmF3N6hbCa0TC/jhw vsYY61wceCjDabDYkZ2ctMj20hODKxPyi7Xvn/JXVGba0sosO1N34n7DLP1cASXa Qg4IbjqE9RpaaEICIJON2CRjGLKVM9p6x2o45e++EDtSqtoW/8C0FCRaemxLmmDL Nni0yNeAY0IvtgbzInGWlQH18naV4dYVntY4035v/vniaSxD5iUYcXvC2t6aP3vd VTwRe9tYwtDd5CT8OLOIKpIG+x1ddhOxo4IuPUI3daghHOhYmIRGLQx2CWde6fbr po2HrrNMv2A/kh1Y6wpuezz4o+He2SwWpTMzFesgy84/m5CfNGA5lw== =Evji -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Wed Aug 10 06:16:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4D612D1A1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:16:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.147 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tIeAx9fXvEFZ for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3759412B05F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unnumerable.local ([173.57.161.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7ADFxXg016537 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:15:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [173.57.161.14] claimed to be unnumerable.local To: Michael Richardson References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> <13033.1470795445@obiwan.sandelman.ca> From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <11fde501-013a-d185-d448-6d3d6010e50a@nostrum.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:15:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13033.1470795445@obiwan.sandelman.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:16:01 -0000 I wonder if, for WG documents, we wouldn't get the same benefit and a more self-correcting workflow, if we added the WG chairs in addition to the previous authors as the set of people who get the email with the link to confirm the post? RjS On 8/9/16 9:17 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > Robert Sparks wrote: > > Thanks Brian. I've captured this as a spot to improve. > > It would be great, for WG documents, if the chairs could manually adjust the > list of who must approve, and/or could see the pending approvals list and > override. > > The usual reason to add a new active author is because the old ones... > became lame. > > -- > Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > From nobody Wed Aug 10 06:24:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916CA12D0C1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WIXpLS02mtwq for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F3E12B016 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:24:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7ADOQHG026088; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:24:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from roku (ip-109-47-3-227.web.vodafone.de [109.47.3.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3s8X1Q2PKwzDCmJ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:24:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:24:25 +0200 From: Carsten Bormann To: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <72860c0b-3b64-4c40-974a-76e71c0083bf@roku> In-Reply-To: <11fde501-013a-d185-d448-6d3d6010e50a@nostrum.com> References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> <13033.1470795445@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <11fde501-013a-d185-d448-6d3d6010e50a@nostrum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="57ab2b09_643c9869_7df" Archived-At: Cc: Michael Richardson , "\"=?utf-8?Q?tools-discuss=40ietf.org?=\"" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:24:32 -0000 --57ab2b09_643c9869_7df Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Robert, The WG chair then has to decide for each update whether the ball is in th= eir court. Better to authorize this from the data tracker in the few case= s where that is actually needed. =20 Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten =20 --57ab2b09_643c9869_7df Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Robert,

The WG chair then has to decide for each upd= ate whether the ball is in their court. Better to authorize this from the= data tracker in the few cases where that is actually needed.

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten

On 10 Aug 2016 15:15, Robert Sparks wrote:

=09

I wonder if, for WG documents, we wouldn't get the same bene= fit and a &=2313;
more self-correcting workflow, if we added the WG c= hairs in addition to &=2313;
the previous authors as the set of peopl= e who get the email with the &=2313;
link to confirm the post=3F&=231= 3;
&=2313;
RjS&=2313;
&=2313;
On 8/9/16 9:17 PM, Michael = Richardson wrote:&=2313;

Robert Spa= rks <rjsparks=40nostrum.com> wrote:&=2313;
Thanks Brian. I've captured this as a spot to improve.&=2313;
&=2313;
It would be great, for WG documents, if the cha= irs could manually adjust the&=2313;
list of who must approve, and/or= could see the pending approvals list and&=2313;
override.&=2313;
&=2313;
The usual reason to add a new active author is because the o= ld ones...&=2313;
became lame.&=2313;
&=2313;
--&=2313;
M= ichael Richardson <mcr+IET=46=40sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software W= orks&=2313;
-=3D IPv6 IoT consulting =3D-&=2313;
&=2313;
&=23= 13;
&=2313;
&=2313;
-- &=2313;
Tools-discuss= mailing list&=2313;
Tools-discuss=40ietf.org&=2313;
https://www.= ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss&=2313;
&=2313;
Please rep= ort datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb&=2313= ;
or send email to datatracker-project=40ietf.org&=2313;
&=2313;<= br/>Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issu= es or&=2313;
send email to webmaster=40tools.ietf.org&=2313;
&=23= 13;
--57ab2b09_643c9869_7df-- From nobody Wed Aug 10 07:11:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6428A12D575 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:11:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQSKD6EXOf88 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A973F12D130 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mfilter42-d.gandi.net (mfilter42-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.172]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35E7FB8C1; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:11:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter42-d.gandi.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.198]) by mfilter42-d.gandi.net (mfilter42-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgfbskvlBcgn; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:11:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 93.199.227.76 Received: from nar-4.local (p5DC7E34C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.227.76]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E28B2FB8A3; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57AB35F9.3050000@tzi.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:11:05 +0200 From: Carsten Bormann User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Sparks References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> <13033.1470795445@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <11fde501-013a-d185-d448-6d3d6010e50a@nostrum.com> <72860c0b-3b64-4c40-974a-76e71c0083bf@roku> In-Reply-To: <72860c0b-3b64-4c40-974a-76e71c0083bf@roku> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Cc: Michael Richardson , "tools-discuss@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:11:16 -0000 Carsten Bormann wrote: > Hi Robert, > > The WG chair then has to decide for each update whether the ball is in > their court. Better to authorize this from the data tracker in the few > cases where that is actually needed. Actually, let me modify this: Include the WG chairs each time the set of authors (author email addresses) has changed in a submission from the previous version. WG chairs want to be alerted about that anyway, and this is the subset of incoming drafts where a bit more attention would not hurt. Grüße, Carsten > > Grüße, Carsten > > On 10 Aug 2016 15:15, Robert Sparks wrote: > >> I wonder if, for WG documents, we wouldn't get the same benefit and a >> more self-correcting workflow, if we added the WG chairs in addition to >> the previous authors as the set of people who get the email with the >> link to confirm the post? >> >> RjS >> >> On 8/9/16 9:17 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >>> Robert Sparks wrote: >>>> Thanks Brian. I've captured this as a spot to improve. >>> >>> It would be great, for WG documents, if the chairs could manually >>> adjust the >>> list of who must approve, and/or could see the pending approvals >>> list and >>> override. >>> >>> The usual reason to add a new active author is because the old ones... >>> became lame. >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works >>> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> >> Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at >> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb >> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >> >> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at >> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or >> send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org >> From nobody Wed Aug 10 07:57:37 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E634812D0FB for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:57:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.148 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fsI_XukRpMSu for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFFC312D0C2 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5302009E; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93EF638BE; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:57:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <57AB35F9.3050000@tzi.org> References: <741AFE63-9D28-4897-9C8B-5D1C91D61BFA@tislabs.com> <08cce74a-a4b5-0cf5-a953-a4d71417db67@gmail.com> <39e2349b-44b4-4945-bd0e-efc1c1d0eabc@gmail.com> <963781f0-4f41-dbf3-1933-1d6e650dafab@gmail.com> <13033.1470795445@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <11fde501-013a-d185-d448-6d3d6010e50a@nostrum.com> <72860c0b-3b64-4c40-974a-76e71c0083bf@roku> <57AB35F9.3050000@tzi.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" , Robert Sparks Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] new author to existing draft submits new version? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:57:36 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Carsten Bormann wrote: > Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> The WG chair then has to decide for each update whether the ball is in >> their court. Better to authorize this from the data tracker in the few >> cases where that is actually needed. > Actually, let me modify this: > Include the WG chairs each time the set of authors (author email > addresses) has changed in a submission from the previous version. > WG chairs want to be alerted about that anyway, and this is the subset > of incoming drafts where a bit more attention would not hurt. +1. solves all the problems nicely. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBV6tA2oCLcPvd0N1lAQIJlAf7BdgiQUZQfB7uhvjzTXh4yz3LkS7Iq8ml w8eHClgA/vcFbLPTpYHg9tKcKh4PzRASm17MjOdSNe1GwQFQHyoldy6D1X/TP51G c3jSmjNr/nWXRI/lEU8phmgs2isdNkaIaz3nbLOeO4UFD3PmYSKgrbQ/axMtbCUI S1QXGEvyuaTLgihzvCPa8hagrCn/n0kSxptQzJ+S61ARcf1AT7hj8ZhpcELFeZHd wch1viEbE5rRt3qN3goqMcGCZ06ZR7g3n1cjgwvEfwKcIx1rRkXP0zOslAD3qpWB aDmM9+3rakPpHWEIdgBoBhpTvozA9qs56lhseJXOVGlXPdgwhVNE8Q== =WKHA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--