From nobody Thu Mar 1 10:59:02 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22A312ECA0 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:59:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtkpdMukyS_7 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot0-x230.google.com (mail-ot0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4231201F2 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n74so6568624ota.1 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5TdehGfHlEc342BPFPnHhiRNOSL1SNs5Rrup5Uvmajw=; b=kYJVR4DcGTgMqj5yFZMwjKfs1Sp0EwarJPBZH4ASlX5iuw5/97MYt4DUsb0VcBPchg rgZGFODMLujMt5aUg1DTTKde1ecmm+IiZjAFZwbR+6W469ErVE75NHD9u5bq8HPYrMDx 7XV7aTVm3vaYWRHZF+hJhQqoj1YRspT8vrxQdci1L/6pqGW/zOohwz7t0KXStVnENzF1 b13Zn7GuSDTM87Ng9F86Xt4pgLbrOKs29gvwA1hsvjE43XilgfLBNVIyJ9LXwtwThdZt 24LsEdFulvVmcK5mjmP7h1xXDvCvDFTSCv97AzEaZK0pKbsjwqdxjZYGGAYYZOLVfVd8 xIOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5TdehGfHlEc342BPFPnHhiRNOSL1SNs5Rrup5Uvmajw=; b=GXayBqvgxIbE7v2CzRVMYdxC+B7DLghfRbqzhrS0FtnHDseUr9I0co5qsomMcv4Ieb RyaRQ6MmFSgbNshWk694LuCORbj6nA1z5hAxjfmyWhAQvgBvFsvOEdaM76oPmG6U+t/L yHu1qZu3NYikU+cZ8YxHd9Wv8eqe9/hUsHtHjQo8AYTxHLGxGjuq+WwOSJh3W/HUG8zI czuS4qVyza50+CLyVczO+XxXJcL8Iq8uE2ptbrhHaFybAHM0HQMaSVmLi3JBvZ6ebIYC NLZysry4hIao9lgGoXa3w6q9LqIdXLnauNAyFUFPZCl1ZewwY/QK14CXM9IiA3GXZhHL 9XoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAHF1TWKD4abLEtDAqC3Wd73bxgkGl+jriwsmuce4COOYh55alR plXvs0qtVDpKd49NcFD2aQ7Bk9PS+850W/4kuyWr7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtBXQstdYKH+mtHV227LoTZSfHMSdXW6XW2qxrVmGTS/Uj5Gug6oZJqr8IvLitrq7E0tQAnOzXk0f6HfYzfr3g= X-Received: by 10.157.27.17 with SMTP id l17mr2196763otl.294.1519930738529; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:58:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.68.57 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:58:57 -0800 (PST) From: Alia Atlas Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:58:57 -0500 Message-ID: To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0944eec0df2105665e7335" Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] is there a way to move individual drafts to be of interest to another WG? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 18:59:01 -0000 --94eb2c0944eec0df2105665e7335 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I seem to recall that there's a way to mark individual drafts of interest to a WG, even if the filename doesn't indicate such. I'd like to figure out how to do that for individual drafts that were targeted at OSPF and ISIS and now are appropriate for the LSR WG. Thanks, Alia --94eb2c0944eec0df2105665e7335 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I seem to recall that there's a way to mark individual= drafts of interest to a
WG, even if the filename doesn't indicate = such.

I'd like to figure out how to do that fo= r individual drafts that were targeted at
OSPF and ISIS and now a= re appropriate for the LSR WG.

Thanks,
A= lia
--94eb2c0944eec0df2105665e7335-- From nobody Thu Mar 1 11:10:33 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B7112ECC2 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:10:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pdByhhICRn-9 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pl0-x22a.google.com (mail-pl0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A19312ECCE for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k8-v6so4189839pli.8 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 11:10:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=TUk5nPEIEdrKWFv28zUJv8ecsasReURNQPPVp15E7vU=; b=kd91G9CbTXt9WgQ36DBP27+6FWGrkRmgEsC6NV1QQS48e6ZoY+1Oo/MIfTnXhZl3Fd DpaDfBFcXc2GhgMLQXixNF5H97rdPOVx/U8fjnD8ZV3zpZHLz3NTYTAAF6xTmY0RpCtp y5+QZSXNsTwR5MK/3mFUQJzeTwuQT2PcD/CyegFyQN7H/MBYyhWBnppQP1obzw9CFBGf zZg66KG7QOzY/3FJbblxJrltPumqhJiXgcDBtwRtSz719wZDirBe5B2OL6Bubs2lzn2b XHkFJmi/ezdJwkFYcDyzfCO4teoTOegnY5XW+tfR0CCyGH+NadtUhZxsVFv1vj61jnx2 uQkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=TUk5nPEIEdrKWFv28zUJv8ecsasReURNQPPVp15E7vU=; b=pIzyOh/DKzXoebk3q8IlJbXaE/sT1tuum7WEzHO8oi0R+liv41cs4LoJYoEv1pFrMX XpLPyL2D58WpEDf/JQtvFUjIXVNH0JrrI6T4amR1LO1ixtHxgzT4OZLCsr0kfKjvCBDa 1EycMpTP84f93Ura/mcYlQ+vLt56m+erbrSkXIPGZNjH/ZSEVJp3sRqFwjy1UEdhOc+3 EUYjHTrNgOGMwDTYciqctddivPjC2br1/gAOB0DjJ14BQYbLOQMChWf7nnHUpugMJox9 bLSvfJrOv+hPAHhH8acQfsqQ/Femp1RW1H8y1l4tKLWNGp1rWtKMHelnyA2qCFUnic6u MgKw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCduYRIKiLK8P+R03w66Y8webp6H2f3VmQL/am/co4C7YWzlStN s0FoZvuD6Jo4I/RLyqG/39hokHP0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu+6QS5R4h7fbeCPQDrTjmPe6Ts7l9/2cDzpsjn1eHB17NlgfjeoNT94W3z7CBsDb+ijAgtug== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9042:: with SMTP id w2-v6mr2809435plz.156.1519931419001; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 11:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm7599091pgc.13.2018.03.01.11.10.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Mar 2018 11:10:18 -0800 (PST) From: Bob Hinden Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_73C0C72E-BDC5-4302-8DFF-DC46D576F5E1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:10:16 -0800 In-Reply-To: Cc: Bob Hinden , tools-discuss@ietf.org To: Alia Atlas References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] is there a way to move individual drafts to be of interest to another WG? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:10:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_73C0C72E-BDC5-4302-8DFF-DC46D576F5E1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Alia, On a w.g. page in the datatracker, in =E2=80=9Cmanage document list=E2=80=9D= one can add individual documents so they will show up in the related = Internet Drafts section. Bob > On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Alia Atlas wrote: >=20 > I seem to recall that there's a way to mark individual drafts of = interest to a > WG, even if the filename doesn't indicate such. >=20 > I'd like to figure out how to do that for individual drafts that were = targeted at > OSPF and ISIS and now are appropriate for the LSR WG. >=20 > Thanks, > Alia > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org > bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues > or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org --Apple-Mail=_73C0C72E-BDC5-4302-8DFF-DC46D576F5E1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEm0rfRsOCoyamPexGrut0EXfnu6gFAlqYUBgACgkQrut0EXfn u6iddAf+Jhnetj5EaPkgMHsEOMaqg56sc9ou7b5yNN/KE2jNGQ43bbKnm2LhWElu sDYoZ4H8129EV0U7FdKYmHoPY2xfxLjrQcy+Imt7xmjrIZb7VTd14J9E/wswCfOu V50FH6b3ok4RCJDgmGkmmUcbEe6k7V5FceFVcTqqFUzVA5hrQYMNZmN1ZmCmDTOB glacdlUEUoYPnFP9kf3qj1A1nxmfDPdDEpGVvrei4MnSeBpxa2SXE+X0I5kvouo4 g9n8ir6iwctpWdWGu18GrRjidC6wEyYwm1IkKnzdRNIroQPfC+3pzgvHwuRQV7bk bWHKGkm/ft/SKpM8ouETwrhm2X31HQ== =ysFC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_73C0C72E-BDC5-4302-8DFF-DC46D576F5E1-- From nobody Wed Mar 14 05:27:11 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32A1126C25 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xlb9pph5soCO for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5A51242EA for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x2so1270805pgo.9 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=UpW/ewdqG6rnjAUwckLC3F1453ciJ3ey6uLcLC7BvI4=; b=QrwqqcJZrR7+/qYtXR/j6/C9wpRY7MUFx7/KcJuUA24W0tmnt84604r46/98oOxVEE VdEgWRhL1AipMU4zga3Jtehh9ifFu+fcWqBzb7sY+LSgAT827RRRvDiF56A0r60DR13S X1BOramYgW0fUrM7koHcm0KDC25tZNMluBhjM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=UpW/ewdqG6rnjAUwckLC3F1453ciJ3ey6uLcLC7BvI4=; b=RqJefBxhq0kpNh13yQfBoIvQNFL6ylIL12iSBTwtVaxwk3ZdY9RmfSXUv27Ly5iq/F RH33rHX6xQ84zfsrovdIExeepsBlWgCrfz2sWFO2fe7G3RaQlBPRMZq6p0g7aAyuwbbb 8tfqurVpd3U4+nleDHNVIa4qde4STs0wgqI7XZdmR4IEWR8Nu4meVM+c4LFvPjeNvhjP mKv5IPu8MlQYC7HfmbRxj9w1J9yJMXNVpxa5PR8758Xm9wGJsWbGnTqeSPCR7UFadc7n DgDVLGvlg4lsuBhmTM10aPz5gmLR6+0/mH+0UrYhgY6FuECQxM081pGBRPJP3FTWFpZm nqDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GLFvn7UYdnSHtIMGNVTSMkJiVjTavcQuu5VaBYGZHoBpHfiGui 3RT29YRw4N5iy3QJx+JQH3UVfIE6KgY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELswK1AA7sLDltzFS4x+FFkOC8rzmdk6SdDIKD5FnI025sYz+buT+rFIF+GqKy1/v0CWS9QjeQ== X-Received: by 10.101.92.6 with SMTP id u6mr3559097pgr.440.1521030427896; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:79e0:d:fd00:3937:280f:ff63:bf4d? ([2a00:79e0:d:fd00:3937:280f:ff63:bf4d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g186sm4989219pfb.168.2018.03.14.05.27.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 05:27:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Turner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Message-Id: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:26:56 +0000 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:27:10 -0000 A number of times, the DOWNREF gets called out in the IETF LC, but = doesn=E2=80=99t make it into the DOWNREF registry. Is there some = process or ticket-based mechanism that chairs/authors can use to put = some kind of confirmation message in the ADs box to automate filling out = the registry? I=E2=80=99m thinking the wg chair/author notes it, the AD gets an email = with a click yes or no, if they click yet it automagically gets added? Or there=E2=80=99s a link on the downref page that says report missing = downref? spt= From nobody Wed Mar 14 11:45:25 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1E126FB3 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:45:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQXAkwTjVK8q for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8363126DED for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0E33005AB for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id T2pqjzvnMiZB for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.6.66] (unknown [5.148.123.140]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53C4B300435; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Russ Housley In-Reply-To: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:20 -0400 Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> To: Sean Turner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:45:24 -0000 Since the AD needs to judge the consensus, the AD needs to approve the = downref once the Last Call completes. This is much less work that = editing the old downref wiki. Russ > On Mar 14, 2018, at 8:26 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >=20 > A number of times, the DOWNREF gets called out in the IETF LC, but = doesn=E2=80=99t make it into the DOWNREF registry. Is there some = process or ticket-based mechanism that chairs/authors can use to put = some kind of confirmation message in the ADs box to automate filling out = the registry? >=20 > I=E2=80=99m thinking the wg chair/author notes it, the AD gets an = email with a click yes or no, if they click yet it automagically gets = added? >=20 > Or there=E2=80=99s a link on the downref page that says report missing = downref? >=20 > spt >=20 From nobody Wed Mar 14 13:06:02 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F72D127241 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:06:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGPs9xqLWZqu for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pl0-x22b.google.com (mail-pl0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D1812426E for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f5-v6so2303549plj.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=E7vTl3TetppUJX87BizhGkWPx25ZGv0ylNmHCdE9NxM=; b=iIQPqWv0JC0LqGyIe1390xC+sWXwyOZwqfhKxXV7uyTrJhJS7OjrQdDhEyohXgi2lJ ZSriIWKXbG+hk8r/UPs/NVaY4XAaHiXC3KWhJGt2CMVgrxv3+SeTfXtDMmL/H1Q2MuHJ wxm9b5B4XYwq9GRmfcCpKGeIVzCST4+Byl79w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=E7vTl3TetppUJX87BizhGkWPx25ZGv0ylNmHCdE9NxM=; b=M1ZT6YwK650aRfzrmp9+4oo5WcDnm+0Dywb0Rt4vGnGzqrb11ff/q3lgF3Em3Hq1RY teiWexB6KTfAVnxSMeBi6ZbladTW2vwRdQewOeaWL3efpJuC0iKa5B+n2QRkWjSr27KH 10hawboURT2uZL2v/EabYBE3+pnIwd7toLWmTC6IoAEXsq8dwK5rFYn/92ELIGh5SQXH D/ZeP4JuSA5naIXDm2pG7wZ+iSoj8zXvKMXcDSD16OLoMOqCQ0qxZKIUOwo//Dr5sBKn 4ilN3V46woZhwoL0Y/UB1/ZAmfogyrtkhRwUDSTrrxaRmdCXrdrI+8O7Mv+VZzwqd3FX E7XA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EXwZaFB5GdeXshaMcKJH7FTQ9t05Jus7QSE+6Y4s3qRcyLK1u7 AhKN/tqkM5RdYu9HiHxDela+GQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvbk5BxoTCY3aIYRb70c1g7PGK1YJIPgM+BVgnrkRd+OctYzUvO9aWE2W5W3OXSAzUlqQtjsA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a9c7:: with SMTP id b7-v6mr5121043plr.190.1521057959250; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [5.5.33.20] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm5337695pgq.34.2018.03.14.13.05.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Sean Turner In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:06:05 +0000 Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> References: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> To: Russ Housley X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:06:01 -0000 I agree that editing the wiki was a PITA, but I guess I do not then = understand how the process works now. Can you explain? spt > On Mar 14, 2018, at 18:45, Russ Housley wrote: >=20 > Since the AD needs to judge the consensus, the AD needs to approve the = downref once the Last Call completes. This is much less work that = editing the old downref wiki. >=20 > Russ >=20 >=20 >> On Mar 14, 2018, at 8:26 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >>=20 >> A number of times, the DOWNREF gets called out in the IETF LC, but = doesn=E2=80=99t make it into the DOWNREF registry. Is there some = process or ticket-based mechanism that chairs/authors can use to put = some kind of confirmation message in the ADs box to automate filling out = the registry? >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m thinking the wg chair/author notes it, the AD gets an = email with a click yes or no, if they click yet it automagically gets = added? >>=20 >> Or there=E2=80=99s a link on the downref page that says report = missing downref? >>=20 >> spt >>=20 >=20 From nobody Thu Mar 15 07:13:27 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA312AF83 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HbIr4VPZpEH0 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44ADB129C70 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2FEDJ82014582; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.217.114] (p5DC7EAF5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.234.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4029YC2NlBzDXJX; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:19 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:18 +0100 Cc: Tools Team Discussion X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 542815997.3140661-faf5280a75c7b338502678ffc8767673 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:13:26 -0000 > ietfdb (6.75.1) ietf; urgency=3Dmedium >=20 > **Modified HTML upload sanitization** This version still deletes This =E2=80=9Csanitization=E2=80=9D initially looks innocuous on the Web = browser, since the HTML is served as: Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dutf-8 However, as soon as you save the HTML file and look at the saved file in = the browser, the charset is lost (and reverts to the default, which is = usually Latin-1). This is bad for offline usage. (Instead of deleting the meta element, the sanitizer should be actively = inserting it if all the HTML is then served as above.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Thu Mar 15 08:06:05 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0389E12D88F for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bA3JiSKekyz3 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E4312D87C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-99-61.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([82.196.99.61]:53719 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ewUS6-0004f8-Hy; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:05:58 -0700 To: Carsten Bormann References: Cc: Tools Team Discussion From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:05:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ko4p9rWhchnfU8SHlEEIXFi8slKkLkKwT" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.196.99.61 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:06:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ko4p9rWhchnfU8SHlEEIXFi8slKkLkKwT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DpRGNOJH1wUA11Bc680Tb6D6QESRmlMa8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: Subject: Re: New datatracker release: v6.75.1 References: In-Reply-To: --DpRGNOJH1wUA11Bc680Tb6D6QESRmlMa8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, On 2018-03-15 15:13, Carsten Bormann wrote: >=20 >> ietfdb (6.75.1) ietf; urgency=3Dmedium >>=20 >> **Modified HTML upload sanitization** >=20 > This version still deletes >=20 > This =E2=80=9Csanitization=E2=80=9D initially looks innocuous on the We= b browser, > since the HTML is served as: >=20 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dutf-8 >=20 > However, as soon as you save the HTML file and look at the saved file > in the browser, the charset is lost (and reverts to the default, > which is usually Latin-1). This is bad for offline usage. >=20 > (Instead of deleting the meta element, the sanitizer should be > actively inserting it if all the HTML is then served as above.) Good point. Thank you :-) I'll see what I can do to fix this. Best regards, Henrik --DpRGNOJH1wUA11Bc680Tb6D6QESRmlMa8-- --ko4p9rWhchnfU8SHlEEIXFi8slKkLkKwT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAlqqi84ACgkQTptXS4+7 FxqJcQ//RscMD/WAcDz1F/STHcVkB8PRohE807QZMGasztAotyoRVoAQv5jBaURz BKDobLaXF3Lie/+7nzX6hJ5IMcPLkC3nZn2J7ASwpp9zf0dSWLgKGaRlI0ZET8qU n81RN5FD6+s7rfT1RB35iDbeeLb96pxV7X8B1xJQwNga7vuawkiM9d4kVDZjXEUH kxTqQYoo1l5O/r3ueKw8SMiTkQAxNtJRb0OeLAm3KcTfE1i32MN5zG2M2C323m+N 1in2LepphfaWKGKNzEHVoSi3e8//tnKDnAWSX7mxMEyde7Yas2Sd3vLQmpCuUd2n EdUqylaN8iX+g9Xl/o+/1K1JW5q8a0TaSwekOkt8CfxKcESQsnNH3ksxJiqPqs9s CGdRklDT+10Njygry0zjLOPzmQMqLxXhTwW8BeQBl9NPh9NAu5cYJ8afNSIXG21b EqiJv2R66nZ/HMMrUuH+Tfy+Z9KGCMRFSMoRi7eHsiksxNT+XsCj3jKyuRzGHwOB sfxU+WCdUUPU+ecg3v34X/uHLPMJh0pvf7v658HorSjvDikHj7clwDwkKsKuywrE zdD/+oW0Ex2rdsZC9iXVSpLz1pkp/aWcIZ2Eh9xcmT2Pc+ditZnQzoP3nunGRuyJ qTZSwR2kWx/Kg1r1F+RlYUHhXhj8rUyiXUm8LWQzWn8bjLzVNGc= =DQ/W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ko4p9rWhchnfU8SHlEEIXFi8slKkLkKwT-- From nobody Fri Mar 16 01:39:09 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B281243FE for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:39:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzxLz86tNXXp for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCEB12704A for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h-99-61.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([82.196.99.61]:64459 helo=[192.168.1.120]) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ewktC-0005z1-38; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:39:03 -0700 To: Sean Turner , Russ Housley References: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:38:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VWv56WTSgjBFp6SfscVDvpaEl56SqEbb1" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.196.99.61 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, sean@sn3rd.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:39:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VWv56WTSgjBFp6SfscVDvpaEl56SqEbb1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UVHuvFBdlQbBBP7rXt0J2HMEaxX7lq5P1"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Sean Turner , Russ Housley Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF References: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> In-Reply-To: <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> --UVHuvFBdlQbBBP7rXt0J2HMEaxX7lq5P1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sean, On 2018-03-14 21:06, Sean Turner wrote: > I agree that editing the wiki was a PITA, but I guess I do not then und= erstand how the process works now. Can you explain? At the top of the downref registry page (under Other > Downref registry in the datatracker), an AD will see a button to "Add downref", something he or she can and should do after judging the last call consensus. Adding a link on the downref registry for chairs to ask for a downref to be added, triggering an AD email with a link to a filled-in form seems feasible. Henrik > spt >=20 >> On Mar 14, 2018, at 18:45, Russ Housley wrote: >>=20 >> Since the AD needs to judge the consensus, the AD needs to approve >> the downref once the Last Call completes. This is much less work >> that editing the old downref wiki. >>=20 >> Russ >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Mar 14, 2018, at 8:26 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >>>=20 >>> A number of times, the DOWNREF gets called out in the IETF LC, >>> but doesn=E2=80=99t make it into the DOWNREF registry. Is there some >>> process or ticket-based mechanism that chairs/authors can use to >>> put some kind of confirmation message in the ADs box to automate >>> filling out the registry? >>>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99m thinking the wg chair/author notes it, the AD gets an ema= il >>> with a click yes or no, if they click yet it automagically gets >>> added? >>>=20 >>> Or there=E2=80=99s a link on the downref page that says report missin= g >>> downref? >>>=20 >>> spt >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org > bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues > or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org >=20 --UVHuvFBdlQbBBP7rXt0J2HMEaxX7lq5P1-- --VWv56WTSgjBFp6SfscVDvpaEl56SqEbb1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAlqrgp4ACgkQTptXS4+7 FxrACBAAyHklSu/Ej2ztwugUm1MDa0sjMamwlfOlM/KVLzd1LqvJt86a8vD05R7o m0nvZjSkdH7SWoYzvVE8+EnhPsTOEgDPGG+/oWkKIoTFd8GKF2A9oMqBWWImEGGW JtMTySTa0ybOOTzZrQWyj1D2FYvNVkxqfm0NkFgJ/MnliEhwhWZBxBS9v6nAUCY0 zAlvansZrq/oml3A0ddH/k5511BoDVe0UTX8FXD+itTDs5CCNbmZToBLR7F2g2Yx H3NMfk7+0WiZlpQr3H5gR3nlNNTxLgYOrZ3HuqqwNYEdPrvASsKwZlDSeyVJXRbz sPE4CBJDBTCsdR+vhKhKXpBLCzMO3EPFs1gFHCDE4S8JrQujAjvYquRnr9JBBGnP kLz1VLno07WidIEZYTWw3iEeacZWrmxXmtsFA3cRRkHdGBRcwqTsFEwKMNUec01d YzzID7sCbw/JFBZRHTI9bBM+l1pCtqhjjVANMAF2tyOBKz5bGeLCs59JQ0nJfViN KDj4E2yhvyHcREZA2pIzAJ4nuULf5tswfsG/My6z+ozMWiL3L2DHfNaRzKOd2JAu kgETBOriDp73gJXfrf+rAFYhOyDZ7wqZUjMIqcJs8yHEeTX8GBftV2cxsg/rgDDU 9gGCYU9YObDd7Nu7KHB8tgdObPey/vpNSBjZUp69KxdddDZAiNc= =USgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VWv56WTSgjBFp6SfscVDvpaEl56SqEbb1-- From nobody Fri Mar 16 05:39:02 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDABB127978 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:39:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuwSeWwOq5my for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4BE12762F for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g12so4027744pgs.0 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VPOJfWbztp50Z9Bey6M7SiKHAiOWs2Sqt+Unz2Opcyo=; b=WJJ77AsabclINp8QUiE4yrRzjOcI7kJZ6TcYo+DHXKI7Ut1naWfw2lEPbmLyQjCPjG V1KmEWqwi+SLM9ceE90gU8xxQ5/m77No7t/HoGNwXFQLFGhxuNvDLycZp6VkAD7z6Lnd DkGBBCa3Ajg/FDz0R216Qt9/QoWz2Ny5DGAWA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VPOJfWbztp50Z9Bey6M7SiKHAiOWs2Sqt+Unz2Opcyo=; b=H38/Ap1aPXo6tx4c8U+qYdBOgJnUgkcOH61WdLAYlq4DCfPA5OXT+86QnAwFVo4Ee5 AIf4A3mxKt3STKTxz4+MdFOPUpwFC90+ieZwJ/0TlOUuS8CPQbvkETnprdpY/1pE6JUZ f36Rp3usIcADRa7NjDu9i6q8IMUPYpzdYcRtXIHjDWN5Q9rLOGriXKI46HGLWRRcfhvZ t3iEYshCCqJGhX+CSrUNhbXVTs07c8z5YkSiDI9YTa27cmVWqkcx9H7AdyNJ82vWu9SL cRCoAdGH/6VWQNlvjZ7nXlx3ZCQa+y/4yvWSDEuVQYF/ZJFlC/VSGf6CZlCJ3h5zEm8M 3JlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Gar7fEAobxU3TU0awpz/uwDgpfEmwHFt4QJ4RVXMgJlE7AeHJ0 dz3mJx8z5Sv+l5xG+JB/HfVpLtmZ3ac= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsRb5mOaCTAMcckmsSfmXkzC7Aw7Buw3mi6n9OwNmcIE64cpr0bxijV/wklrS+ufqO6YGRj3w== X-Received: by 10.101.64.197 with SMTP id u5mr1377290pgp.23.1521203938822; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [5.5.33.98] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p24sm16570788pfk.102.2018.03.16.05.38.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Sean Turner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:38:50 +0000 Cc: Russ Housley , tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1D685837-C374-4CD7-B424-F20D92000AD9@sn3rd.com> References: <586E33F8-A044-4C03-BDC3-9B1CD390178C@sn3rd.com> <027EECDA-6D70-49A8-B928-6DF81FDC43F7@sn3rd.com> To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Populating DOWNREF X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:39:01 -0000 >=20 > Adding a link on the downref registry for chairs to ask for a downref = to > be added, triggering an AD email with a link to a filled-in form seems > feasible. >=20 Yeah that=E2=80=99s basically what I was asking for. I remember = forgetting to fill out the registry and it usually bit me latter. spt= From nobody Sat Mar 17 06:49:18 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EAE127867 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:49:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEBL4DDYMHRv for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D5B126DCA for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51] (port=60219) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1exCCv-0006BE-DG; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:49:13 -0700 To: Carsten Bormann References: Cc: Tools Team Discussion From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:49:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eth841fkFH2k02TLotdjOqWMru9ilaE6H" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:49:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eth841fkFH2k02TLotdjOqWMru9ilaE6H Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vUWi4VU0a2ocvw5545aadqv3ugPKQoO0P"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 References: In-Reply-To: --vUWi4VU0a2ocvw5545aadqv3ugPKQoO0P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, On 2018-03-15 16:05, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Carsten, >=20 > On 2018-03-15 15:13, Carsten Bormann wrote: >>=20 >>> ietfdb (6.75.1) ietf; urgency=3Dmedium >>>=20 >>> **Modified HTML upload sanitization** >>=20 >> This version still deletes >>=20 >> This =E2=80=9Csanitization=E2=80=9D initially looks innocuous on the W= eb browser, >> since the HTML is served as: >>=20 >> Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dutf-8 >>=20 >> However, as soon as you save the HTML file and look at the saved file >> in the browser, the charset is lost (and reverts to the default, >> which is usually Latin-1). This is bad for offline usage. >>=20 >> (Instead of deleting the meta element, the sanitizer should be >> actively inserting it if all the HTML is then served as above.) >=20 > Good point. Thank you :-) I'll see what I can do to fix this. This should be fixed in 6.75.2, released earlier today. Best regards, Henrik >=20 >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Henrik >=20 >=20 >=20 > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org > bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues > or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org >=20 --vUWi4VU0a2ocvw5545aadqv3ugPKQoO0P-- --eth841fkFH2k02TLotdjOqWMru9ilaE6H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAlqtHNYACgkQTptXS4+7 FxqqGA//XTf+ozMaguiOyI+ptqJY3sp9QPqlvEyldQgD9bKGjOSCO8SlPHzD92Im uXBzJiZqqP78nnPg43XzHWxqT42vhrIEfHDSfULisUfZqCBlBBcpSx7+ENVN3AqC of4+wLC+z0eEOiCsCusITgG9W9UIgBTlLsS93u0gUp3rE8OGZVk1yTXSKrvbeNuv QkPb/bPQE0n9i5bKs9raIfAOnHAxI6dlSDE3ncs9IXEnGjjvg8G3UxbQB2XRf0h4 S6seYEmwQ75hy1HMQ1oxRW4pn0NmCU11z3eNmOJSvAPzGBZ1XIeOCo5lrETa5zWu okJ5VOuys07qnqcm8BGhn1yix5LREGgzlQOTgG2I4/1vLcZ4P5o36ZkxTT/Ej8Ft bsO2QwX60eKMxtKtXlPrJdOzbiK+p/edFke/xyNZUk/UZ9cl7LHuJU57TR59CRtK zn9TlIkcZ198bR9533rIEINoT/6y1tRvK0UCZcF4blKZSUisbFZMfiOK99hjHUc4 HE4lCSiGKhvoj09GE4jNVKl1bQ5kgmoO9c3mPB8vc6b2VOrWkKQd0n6Zoi3jVHP4 7uDfcXmeHvoPbx6z/U27cdIpAFVstogiiWouJRzmZqChq1Kep4ZQHuN2PsJltymh fBY2VlCzSNPRYLsWhiuLooqdy8C15HwANZRLYpvS2CG06tt/C48= =pPdn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eth841fkFH2k02TLotdjOqWMru9ilaE6H-- From nobody Sat Mar 17 07:11:23 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FC5126E01 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:11:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6HfOolSS69P for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADD391241F3 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2HEBFQn006546; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:11:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.0.72] (unknown [31.130.231.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 403PPv2H0VzDXht; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:11:15 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:11:14 +0000 Cc: Tools Team Discussion X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 542988673.040329-457f300aa6d89f75d6ba660bdca76a54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:11:22 -0000 On Mar 17, 2018, at 13:49, Henrik Levkowetz = wrote: >=20 > This should be fixed in 6.75.2, released earlier today. Hmm, I just uploaded https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-core and that still seems to be without the meta element. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Sat Mar 17 08:00:30 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21957128959 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6C9KUITqSYHY for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB3712711B for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51] (port=62956) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1exDJp-0007Lt-Qd; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:00:26 -0700 To: Carsten Bormann References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> Cc: Tools Team Discussion From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:00:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jNsbF1UwHarvWpBSpWQKacMur2ptDtHVM" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:00:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jNsbF1UwHarvWpBSpWQKacMur2ptDtHVM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="b3qw0GHdVWpBqeOnpd9pLcufPXkltltVJ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> --b3qw0GHdVWpBqeOnpd9pLcufPXkltltVJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, On 2018-03-17 15:11, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Mar 17, 2018, at 13:49, Henrik Levkowetz wrot= e: >>=20 >> This should be fixed in 6.75.2, released earlier today. >=20 > Hmm, I just uploaded >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-core >=20 > and that still seems to be without the meta element. I don't think Matt has deployed the new release yet. I should have been more careful, and pointed out that it wouldn't be live immediately. Sorry= :-/ I'll send you a note when that's done -- I'd normally expect that to happ= en the next weekday, on meeting weeks they also seem to be online and active= Saturday/Sunday. Best regards, Henrik --b3qw0GHdVWpBqeOnpd9pLcufPXkltltVJ-- --jNsbF1UwHarvWpBSpWQKacMur2ptDtHVM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAlqtLYcACgkQTptXS4+7 FxqWyhAA0u3xQGVdjeryfFDPamcnDvnq4ccIxkvyeOya9NjtvkrBT8WSvsGd4ED0 V0cvhU0NHhQ9tVPGIQJJ1asBPUIQyeGMUFsLZ++ojggU5R2/6AdpylPH7JGrSx1h g3WohyXwenpSqaC0apex90tT/rmkxoemMy7dcAnm1VsEaTuKRFi+LdIIestLbGcM FNNwL/qYRF7aef7kCC11ygaowQQ9u8JZqs4BD4YaBqmzWQM+B7HyILQ+Dij6n0dK Ea6SC0WGvKn1rlxdVvvAszqA8NoqsOsxvprlzbUQlNNhcOWaGYelqUTgT8/tWa4A X+nwWDXZKLlMGcaA2GklfiRCkBwOI8mMlEFrdkZE/8CmG6/zPoaThyCm7ylXj6Q2 LSP+YXkYWfDgewYhihM6XM1XIOYfxtkTXd3G6gDCbeu/JoGs2PfiX2kOxvSTKkm8 KiY/lo8hr0Gmcn5YYnCrIIO+hi194ACOBHblHK+RFpvvClVDvtjVP4fiS8OQeZBU PW3MkEcwmhNvH3ro8zHaX9+oZtilJmNqSYSDl4wFNUNA+R4LbQYOLdlI04FicM7L m+t5OOiMDcJFK1B5BFHhzceAhnPr2E1it/hQyVZV1Few3pgyArV4wGAYw68uVaK9 L3eku7bKgFzsb6DlCqOltifHdleYyrGGo3VLTEg0FQwJdBHvfq8= =r0v7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jNsbF1UwHarvWpBSpWQKacMur2ptDtHVM-- From nobody Sat Mar 17 08:52:40 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9641289B0 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNYT8VLNc3Ni for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67306129C51 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A61C9E7F; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7i8PHu-vQ2lP; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2600:380:624a:5a0e:349e:3de:3c3b:1ec5] (unknown [IPv6:2600:380:624a:5a0e:349e:3de:3c3b:1ec5]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D8DF1C65D5; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Matt Larson X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:52:34 -0400 Cc: Carsten Bormann , Tools Team Discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2F420350-A260-44A9-8168-30EA8BBAC757@amsl.com> References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> To: Henrik Levkowetz Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:52:39 -0000 Hi Henrik, I=E2=80=99ll get this deployed in a couple hours.=20 Matt > On Mar 17, 2018, at 11:00, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >=20 > Hi Carsten, >=20 >> On 2018-03-17 15:11, Carsten Bormann wrote: >>> On Mar 17, 2018, at 13:49, Henrik Levkowetz wrote= : >>>=20 >>> This should be fixed in 6.75.2, released earlier today. >>=20 >> Hmm, I just uploaded >>=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-core >>=20 >> and that still seems to be without the meta element. >=20 > I don't think Matt has deployed the new release yet. I should have been > more careful, and pointed out that it wouldn't be live immediately. Sorry := -/ >=20 > I'll send you a note when that's done -- I'd normally expect that to happe= n > the next weekday, on meeting weeks they also seem to be online and active > Saturday/Sunday. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Henrik >=20 > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >=20 > Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org > bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb > or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org >=20 > Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues > or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org From nobody Sat Mar 17 11:46:01 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFC212D7E6 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:46:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lX4yhRhdKVm for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B06212D7E4 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51] (port=65317) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1exGq5-0006GB-Ei; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:45:59 -0700 To: Carsten Bormann References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> Cc: Tools Team Discussion From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <4aa43c00-e1fc-9537-00a8-7e8e3dfabb81@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 19:45:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aU0cebdHPPvbFVnMMuEcGOKwmHJ2oltoP" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:1232:144:4c6b:1931:9070:5b51 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 18:46:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --aU0cebdHPPvbFVnMMuEcGOKwmHJ2oltoP Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0sM4q2M1VaV9L9ssUN9uamid8eCoO6vft"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Tools Team Discussion Message-ID: <4aa43c00-e1fc-9537-00a8-7e8e3dfabb81@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New datatracker release: v6.75.1 References: <8af4ab1f-b9e6-a06c-1318-703deabfe3ec@levkowetz.com> <5075A450-B08C-4061-BF3F-4A3AD174FE83@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: --0sM4q2M1VaV9L9ssUN9uamid8eCoO6vft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Carsten, Matt has now deployed 6.75.2. Henrik On 2018-03-17 16:00, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi Carsten, >=20 > On 2018-03-17 15:11, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> On Mar 17, 2018, at 13:49, Henrik Levkowetz wro= te: >>>=20 >>> This should be fixed in 6.75.2, released earlier today. >>=20 >> Hmm, I just uploaded >>=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-core >>=20 >> and that still seems to be without the meta element. >=20 > I don't think Matt has deployed the new release yet. I should have bee= n > more careful, and pointed out that it wouldn't be live immediately. Sor= ry :-/ >=20 > I'll send you a note when that's done -- I'd normally expect that to ha= ppen > the next weekday, on meeting weeks they also seem to be online and acti= ve > Saturday/Sunday. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Henrik >=20 --0sM4q2M1VaV9L9ssUN9uamid8eCoO6vft-- --aU0cebdHPPvbFVnMMuEcGOKwmHJ2oltoP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAlqtYmMACgkQTptXS4+7 FxpnnQ//aaJf+L+tSTZ5D9/wYG6nlIbl3LchJiwL75BZkV997JLdnp8QrsZwL2Oo KGG/Kv2BJ2gK2cFSTDtuWoRk88kOeitcPY2FlJy2g7/MlWMbtMEuly2VTSnwokm3 tNzbHauv6jFUnGUlk4KoUkeUx0ur3S9NBnukA3pj+Dlg6fiFIokCZb5zQIPfBwmR 8zoOoj++gFSTyrHPBGLSUsQVbukNq9r97JuiKYEh3MtqWrE+QhPR6ccG1crQMSi4 UdTp/0rBAL7Ehonr9RKEk4/kl663DLcQCKKo5SDiE/EILEUU4cRye+gUY7y7U0gS 2tA+2kpZUc8ARbUnetFPI7/QXUGRg+oaRr0Xz2qozhfv6oKtvDOrIgbL2qf6wRuj G3j7ISwei7hQ9s77GZ1bSrlE0IXqPEQNXEhdWkoOZoEKOKbu/+4xBSCX5EKnTA6o /rmT7x/LlXXJtuLpb2m0aiCbwZ2UCIqPSYQZBotuKjPVkolGkUvnxuHRg5Xv7DiZ KKVJeRxn34zp5RlXjlD+V5KTQatV8HQOWo7APvC+BdDkx7E8TBkpzb7fQeBtih0m 94ZRW4i+G5AYkvVAAGMrHcOvS3BoNzcykf2qS1HKMLTORLCYNW2PFhZVQyZKoad+ MZVyChMM3k7Uy0+4IMkzC4LRjnHmlX43gSf1rUmObWODMIZrzs8= =1YZk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aU0cebdHPPvbFVnMMuEcGOKwmHJ2oltoP--