Subject: Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far

From: John Stanley <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT)

"Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>No, 1B and 1D and NOT "what RFC2142 says", neither is 2B

Please read RFC2142 before you try telling us what it says, Charles.

Specifically for abuse@, 2B says:

 2B) All identities SHOULD support

RFC2142 says:

   Note, however, that it is valid and encouraged
   to support mailbox names for sub-domains, as appropriate.

Close enough. Much closer than your "MUST" for the FQDN.