From nobody Thu Apr 2 14:23:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44141A3BA4 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:23:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rl2Go_s6QI1z for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972381A1A33 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56308 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YdmZo-0001fR-Ea; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:23:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:23:00 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/257#comment:3 Message-ID: <078.0e5ea05488bd51c9c3b92d7955f60a32@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.13196fe3b2934ddfc14c4acc72608f18@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 257 In-Reply-To: <063.13196fe3b2934ddfc14c4acc72608f18@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #257 (Version 2 cli): extraneous warnings for entities X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:23:01 -0000 #257: extraneous warnings for entities Comment (by arusso@amsl.com): In case this helps anyone troubleshoot their own installation: this was resolved by updating several software packages (including lxml) to the current versions. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: worksforme | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 10 04:25:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADCD1B2C78 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:25:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LKIzHGGkzJ1e for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470DA1B2C77 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39334 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YgX3r-0002XR-Ht; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:25:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:25:23 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/289 Message-ID: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 289 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: [xml2rfc] #289 (Version 2 cli): Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:25:27 -0000 #289: Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options When using XML2RFC on xml2rfc.ietf.org one gets a waring: WARNING: The -f and --filename options are deprecated and will go away in version 3.0 of xml2rfc. Use -f instead WARNING: You should not specify conflicting -f and -o options. Using -o OUTPUT Can you please correct this deployment so this warning doesn't hide real warnings related to document. -- --------------------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com | Owner: Type: defect | henrik@levkowetz.com Priority: medium | Status: new Component: Version 2 cli | Milestone: Keywords: | Version: 2.4.x --------------------------------------------+------------------------------ Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 10 04:55:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983C41B2CC7 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:55:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHbEhhbHsWpz for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E43E1B2CC6 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40720 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YgXX7-0007MV-6x; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:55:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:55:37 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/289#comment:1 Message-ID: <093.02eb9e3a116b59215ba129376b109b25@tools.ietf.org> References: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 289 In-Reply-To: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #289 (Version 2 cli): Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:55:38 -0000 #289: Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options Comment (by henrik@levkowetz.com): These should of course not show, but I know I've changed the -f option in one place, so a bit more information about url and form options would be good to have when debugging this. Also, I'm not sure how these are hiding real warnings -- it would be good to get more information about that, too. -- ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com | Owner: Type: defect | henrik@levkowetz.com Priority: medium | Status: new Component: Version 2 cli | Milestone: Resolution: | Version: 2.4.x | Keywords: ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 10 13:16:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A081A8845 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1rdK4QB1kY0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCC31A8842 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36862 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YgfLN-0000AU-EW; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:16:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:16:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/289#comment:2 Message-ID: <093.6d60c992ef790199fb9ed817cdf66c9f@tools.ietf.org> References: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 289 In-Reply-To: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #289 (Version 2 cli): Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:16:04 -0000 #289: Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options Comment (by tony@att.com): Henrik, xml2rfc.cgi invokes xml2rfc with the arguments {{{ xml2rfc --verbose --cache=/tmp --$MODE --out=$OUTNAME $INPUT }}} It generates this warning message: {{{ WARNING: The -f and --filename options are deprecated and will go away in version 3.0 of xml2rfc. Use -f instead WARNING: You should not specify conflicting -f and -o options. Using -o OUTPUT }}} To replicate, use the web form at http://xml2rfc.ietf.org and feed it a file. At the top of the next page, you'll see the message "Warnings exist". This is triggered by the above WARNING message, as well as any other real Warnings. If you can let me know what arguments SHOULD be used by xml2rfc.cgi to invoke xml2rfc, I'll adjust xml2rfc.cgi accordingly. -- ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com | Owner: Type: defect | henrik@levkowetz.com Priority: medium | Status: new Component: Version 2 cli | Milestone: Resolution: | Version: 2.4.x | Keywords: ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 10 14:51:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDCD1A8F3B for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PasYI3ECkm2B for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ECF1A8BC5 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41418 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yggq0-00028j-4o; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:51:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:51:44 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/289#comment:3 Message-ID: <093.fc101758c794a7d2c20905029e1a2e7f@tools.ietf.org> References: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 289 In-Reply-To: <078.b3ca9daeb683fa579d669f1245b42286@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #289 (Version 2 cli): Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:51:45 -0000 #289: Deployment of XML2RFC on xml2RFC.ietf.org uses wrong options Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: This has been fixed in [1848]: Corrected a bug in emitting the -f deprecation message. -- ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com | Owner: Type: defect | henrik@levkowetz.com Priority: medium | Status: closed Component: Version 2 cli | Milestone: Resolution: fixed | Version: 2.4.x | Keywords: ---------------------------------------------+----------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Mon Apr 13 07:39:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0589F1AC429 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:39:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.68 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cg-M70Qm4JUA for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpdg5.aruba.it (smtpdg5.aruba.it [62.149.158.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973001AC418 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lminiero ([143.225.229.186]) by smtpcmd05.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id FSf91q00z41wnh301SfATT; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:39:12 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:39:10 +0200 From: Lorenzo Miniero To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Message-ID: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> Organization: Meetecho X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Unable to resolve external request X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:39:29 -0000 Hi, I can't seem to get a draft to be processed. I always get a "Unable to resolve external request:" for references, e.g.: ERROR: Unable to parse the XML document: INPUT INPUT: Line 674: Unable to resolve external request: "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml" I verified that the link exists and can be opened. The same happens both on the website and when launching the xml2rfc tool on my PC locally. Passing the XML to the old version of the website works. Strangely enough, it doesn't seem to be doing the same for *all* references: that is, if I comment the RFC2119 line, it works fine with, e.g., RFC3261 and a few others, but then fails on another reference (RFC7092). Not sure as to what may be the cause, as all references have exactly the same format (and same host), and worked fine up to a few weeks ago (when I converted the last version of my draft). Unfortunately I'm not very familiar with Python, so I don't know what I can do to check what's wrong myself. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you tackle this issue. Thanks, Lorenzo From nobody Mon Apr 13 08:06:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AE91ACCD8 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:06:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L_lp6-X3ckTD for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF361ACCF0 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhkiL-1ZC4s91es5-00mtkO; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:06:20 +0200 Message-ID: <552BDB6B.2000005@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:06:19 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Miniero , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> In-Reply-To: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PXGOzLR2WK00SrfFYWkf+GZW0AQR7S3SudVyfW+CsfHd7uXtTng 7jTh0lztYEtLSHmZTWSx4VJ4QTPSts8aEz/GExQgkGYuYlGtFRnpFYOJ5ZwuRZCdcI16k2F w4pw4UZM1Usdy+fy1bTHhdZPSRYiaHkmDY3waT6mgOaEOuUxgCIEOO2+WZtRe7/RjddpOK2 dUmt8BcHtILH3XWGbSztw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Unable to resolve external request X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:06:25 -0000 On 2015-04-13 16:39, Lorenzo Miniero wrote: > Hi, > > I can't seem to get a draft to be processed. I always get a "Unable to > resolve external request:" for references, e.g.: > > ERROR: Unable to parse the XML document: INPUT > INPUT: Line 674: Unable to resolve external request: > "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml" > > I verified that the link exists and can be opened. The same happens > both on the website and when launching the xml2rfc tool on my PC > locally. Passing the XML to the old version of the website works. > > Strangely enough, it doesn't seem to be doing the same for *all* > references: that is, if I comment the RFC2119 line, it works fine with, > e.g., RFC3261 and a few others, but then fails on another reference > (RFC7092). Not sure as to what may be the cause, as all references have > exactly the same format (and same host), and worked fine up to a few > weeks ago (when I converted the last version of my draft). > > Unfortunately I'm not very familiar with Python, so I don't know what I > can do to check what's wrong myself. Let me know if there's anything I > can do to help you tackle this issue. > > Thanks, > Lorenzo It it hurts, don't do it :-) (Translation: if your file was self-contained and wouldn't depend on external dependencies, you wouldn't have this problem) Best regards, Julian From nobody Tue Apr 14 10:44:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6CC1A19EC for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXxwXHJEFak7 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1001A1A00 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49062 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yi4sY-0005lM-Nr; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:44:06 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:1 Message-ID: <078.66d707e515744503a8ea89d4996ec1ea@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:44:08 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Changes (by arusso@amsl.com): * priority: medium => major -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Tue Apr 14 10:58:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8302C1A90F8 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.579 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8jHB-XWCut2 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.209.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78CF71A910E for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.168.66.58] (port=52488 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Yi0jQ-000CSa-Cc for xml2rfc@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:18:26 -0700 Message-ID: <552D139F.5000600@usdonovans.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:18:23 +0200 From: Steve Donovan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srd+usdonovans.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:58:04 -0700 Subject: [xml2rfc] External references not working X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:18:27 -0000 I have been updating a couple of internet drafts and find that the external referencing mechanism no longer works for XML2RFC. Has something changed in the method to specify external references? Regards, Steve From nobody Wed Apr 15 15:11:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427C71A9218 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:11:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pC4qK6NKj6rE for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78C11A9233 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id c12ee255.0.1668335.00-1966.4741349.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:11:43 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 552ee21f7f6f79e4-2d38226a33be48e6b468310ec771935e5a6e6eef Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FMBesg023604 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:40 -0400 Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FMBZMB023548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:35 -0400 Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:11:18 GMT Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FMBHhf021399 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:17 -0400 Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FMBDlk021080 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:13 -0400 Received: from tonys-macbook-pro.local (unknown[135.110.240.1](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20150415221112gw1000cevke>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:11:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.110.240.1] Message-ID: <552EE200.80001@att.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:12 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Miniero , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> In-Reply-To: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=ZfOqwLpA c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=5hWoPXNsKEoA:10 a=E9ixjVVagDgA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=N65] X-AnalysisOut: [9UExz7-8A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=e9J7MTPGsLIA:10 a=rqrk_YMJ] X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=Z0pTotinYejP43ne0Q0A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Unable to resolve external request X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:11:46 -0000 We're working on resolving this. A temporary workaround has been put into place, so you should be able to continue working. Tony Hansen On 4/13/15 10:39 AM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote: > Hi, > > I can't seem to get a draft to be processed. I always get a "Unable to > resolve external request:" for references, e.g.: > > ERROR: Unable to parse the XML document: INPUT > INPUT: Line 674: Unable to resolve external request: > "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml" From nobody Thu Apr 16 01:42:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B281B2C4D for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xk2fHs_yAfBF for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpcmd01217.aruba.it (smtpcmd01217.aruba.it [62.149.158.217]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884BC1B2C49 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lminiero ([143.225.229.186]) by smtpcmd01.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id GYiL1q01Q41wnh301YiLWy; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:42:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:42:19 +0200 From: Lorenzo Miniero To: Tony Hansen Message-ID: <20150416104219.24205f8e@lminiero> In-Reply-To: <552EE200.80001@att.com> References: <20150413163910.31e7da4e@lminiero> <552EE200.80001@att.com> Organization: Meetecho X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Unable to resolve external request X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:42:24 -0000 Hi Tony, thanks for looking into this! Unfortunately the workaround doesn't seem to be working for me: I'm not getting any error anymore, but the service returns an empty txt file. I'm still getting the same error when trying the tool (updated via pip) locally instead, but I'm not sure the workaround has been pushed there so please disregard in case. I can provide the xml source that is causing this, if you think it can help debugging the issue. Thanks, Lorenzo On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:11:12 -0400 Tony Hansen wrote: > We're working on resolving this. > > A temporary workaround has been put into place, so you should be able > to continue working. > > Tony Hansen > > On 4/13/15 10:39 AM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I can't seem to get a draft to be processed. I always get a "Unable > > to resolve external request:" for references, e.g.: > > > > ERROR: Unable to parse the XML document: INPUT > > INPUT: Line 674: Unable to resolve external request: > > "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml" From nobody Thu Apr 16 10:05:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AD21B3300 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:05:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnwrXq7DWWg0 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A271B32F7 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40433 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YinDn-00060w-76; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:04:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, miek@miek.nl X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:04:59 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/290 Message-ID: <060.7cbb17142de6507033d53d0ce9a4a1ee@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 290 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, miek@miek.nl, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: [xml2rfc] #290 (Version 2 cli): URI don't add up X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:05:03 -0000 #290: URI don't add up So I have this 80-page draft, https://gist.githubusercontent.com/miekg/0251f3e28652fa603a51/raw/7e0a7028506f7d2948e4ad3091f533711bf5f2a4/learninggo.txt actually this is a book, but I'm testing my conversion to xml2rfc. And the URI section has: {{{ 9.2. URIs [1] http://golang.org/doc/ [2] fig/array-vs-slice.png [3] fig/stack.png [4] fig/reflection.png [5] https://www.debian.org }}} However the book has URI going up to 7: {{{ o "len(array) == cap(array) == m" fig/array-vs-slice.png Array versus slice [7] Figure 1: An array versus a slice. Given an array, or another slice, a new slice is created via }}} I tried to make a shorter example that has the same defect, but I failed. Maybe someone more familiar with the xml2rfc code can comment before I try that. -- ---------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: miek@miek.nl | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | ---------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Thu Apr 16 14:42:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D42A1B374A for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deUvTNBJqzog for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D57E1B3744 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55686 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YirXw-0007BF-2W; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:42:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, tony@att.com, mferguson@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:42:03 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/247#comment:9 Message-ID: <078.fb02d571ff3abc20a502d43e93d20d5f@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.43ddb8b4ec21380945f0282fa80680ea@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 247 In-Reply-To: <063.43ddb8b4ec21380945f0282fa80680ea@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, tony@att.com, mferguson@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #247 (Version 2 cli): &rfc.number; yields "XXXX" no matter what X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:42:24 -0000 #247: &rfc.number; yields "XXXX" no matter what Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => worksforme Comment: This was finally traced down to a library problem. Upgrading pip, then upgrading the requirements fixed this. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: worksforme | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 08:07:27 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DFE1B2D16 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WEmvgM3OXz1f for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FC51A8AAD for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLR-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com (192.168.196.172) by WTL-EXCHP-3.sandvine.com (192.168.196.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:58:40 -0400 Received: from WTL-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::68ac:f071:19ff:3455]) by blr-exchp-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::6c6d:7108:c63c:9055%14]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:58:40 -0400 From: Dave Dolson To: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: xml2rfc version? Thread-Index: AdB4jN9p2Yrh+/FPQ9OAd3z4w4RXpw== Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:38 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.200.63] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830BD109Fwtlexchp2sandvi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:07:26 -0700 Subject: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:46 -0000 --_000_E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830BD109Fwtlexchp2sandvi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, (I thought maybe I should be asking someone from the RFC editor, but I coul= dn't find contact info anywhere.) I'm trying to use this validator: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ I'm starting from this template: http://www.rfc-editor.org/template-bare-05= .txt (Found from IETF tools page) But the validator doesn't load the template; there are multiple problems. Can you tell me which is more correct, the template or the validator? I think the template is probably more correct, since it has, But the validator doesn't understand that value of "ipr". Also confusing is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629, which indicates "full= 2026" as a possible value of "ipr". Can you help me sort out which templates and tools are current? Thanks, David Dolson --_000_E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830BD109Fwtlexchp2sandvi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

(I thought maybe I should be asking someone from the= RFC editor, but I couldn’t find contact info anywhere.)

 

I’m trying to use this validator: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/

 

I’m starting from this template: http://www.rfc-editor.org/template-bare-05.txt

(Found from IETF tools page)

 

But the validator doesn’t load the template; t= here are multiple problems.

 

Can you tell me which is more correct, the template = or the validator?

I think the template is probably more correct, since= it has,

<rfc category=3D"info" docName=3D"= draft-ietf-xml2rfc-template-05" ipr=3D"full3978">

 

But the validator doesn’t understand that valu= e of “ipr”.

Also confusing is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629, which indicates “full2026R= 21; as a possible value of “ipr”.

 

Can you help me sort out which templates and tools a= re current?

 

Thanks,

 

David Dolson

 

--_000_E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830BD109Fwtlexchp2sandvi_-- From nobody Fri Apr 17 09:11:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D321A1B22 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:11:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4QNYukJQjxVi for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18BAD1A1B21 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59502 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj8r7-00078J-Ui; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:11:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:11:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:2 Message-ID: <078.34fbeb9a71d6a9ea97c87f0d20f08ab5@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:11:03 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by henrik@levkowetz.com): Ok, I've identified where this fails, and should be able to insert the appropriate nroff command, but I'm not sure what the correct nroff should look like. Could you provide a sample? I might guess at something like the following, but guessing isn't quite the thing to do here ,:-) {{{ Here is a list: .in 6 apples .br bananas .br cherries .br dates }}} -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 09:14:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F111A1B67 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:14:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PiTWeWu7oeY for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C3E1A1B5F for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90211E5D86; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:12:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeE6BxkBKGFm; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (c-73-35-192-216.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.35.192.216]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DAA61E5D80; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Alice Russo In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:14:08 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4DD4EAE7-5B02-418D-B644-6551461175CD@amsl.com> References: To: Dave Dolson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:14:08 -0000 Dave, We have updated that template to use one of the current options = (ipr=3D'trust200902') as described on http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ under "To = generate the latest boilerplate". The RFC Editor can be reached at rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Additional = contact info is here: http://www.rfc-editor.org/contacts.html Thank you. RFC Editor/ar On Apr 17, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Dave Dolson wrote: > Hi, > (I thought maybe I should be asking someone from the RFC editor, but I = couldn=92t find contact info anywhere.) > =20 > I=92m trying to use this validator: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ > =20 > I=92m starting from this template: = http://www.rfc-editor.org/template-bare-05.txt > (Found from IETF tools page) > =20 > But the validator doesn=92t load the template; there are multiple = problems. > =20 > Can you tell me which is more correct, the template or the validator? > I think the template is probably more correct, since it has, > > =20 > But the validator doesn=92t understand that value of =93ipr=94. > Also confusing is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629, which indicates = =93full2026=94 as a possible value of =93ipr=94. > =20 > Can you help me sort out which templates and tools are current? > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > David Dolson > =20 > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 09:40:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C191A6FF0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dar9Eua5Zwuc for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6341F1A6FF9 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33124 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9Jx-0001M1-8z; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:40:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:40:49 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:3 Message-ID: <078.dc51893a5ed21bfe322baee400410430@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:40:52 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by tony@att.com): The v1 nroff processor would repeat the .in indent command. (Actually, v1 uses a combination of .in and .ti [temporary indent].) When the list has blank lines between, they are done using a blank line in the input. For example, {{{ .ti 3 apples .ti 3 bananas .ti 3 cherries .ti 3 dates }}} or {{{ .ti 3 apples .ti 3 bananas .ti 3 cherries .ti 3 dates }}} The use of .in and .ti should be considered equivalent. (The leading dot in each command is an implicit .br.) -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 11:07:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C821B2D44 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:07:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eS4aL5s4NlSW for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758891B2D25 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38317 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAgC-0002tI-VT; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:07:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:07:52 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:4 Message-ID: <078.5a15541a3d509d218caa5d63cf976c0f@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:07:56 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by henrik@levkowetz.com): Ok. Is the use of .ti 3 (or .ti 6, or .ti N) a must, or would .br work, too? To me, the use of .ti N in addition to the current .in in front of the list looks a lot more hacky than using just .br, and in addition to that the code to produce it becomes more complex than for .br , since I then have to make the indentation level available at the place where .ti would be inserted, which is a different place than where the .in N is handled. No big deal, but I'd like to understand and not make things more complicated and less readable if it's all the same ,:-) -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 11:29:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CBE1B2EF8 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfSGCXXKeTEc for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C836A1B2EF7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WTL-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::68ac:f071:19ff:3455]) by wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com ([fe80::ac6b:cc1e:f2ff:93aa%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:29:48 -0400 From: Dave Dolson To: Alice Russo Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? Thread-Index: AdB4jN9p2Yrh+/FPQ9OAd3z4w4RXpwAvi/kAAAPcizA= Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:29:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4DD4EAE7-5B02-418D-B644-6551461175CD@amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <4DD4EAE7-5B02-418D-B644-6551461175CD@amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.200.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:29:51 -0000 Alice, Thanks, that worked. Another thing I've noted is that the tool at http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ doesn= 't generate working links for references to RFCs or I.Ds For example, this is the link generated for "BCP 78" in the boilerplate: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?b= cp=3D78 And this is the link generated for RFC2119: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?r= fc=3D2119 This is the link generated for an ID: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?d= raft=3Ddraft-homma-sfc-forwarding-methods-analysis-01 These links don't work for me, getting "Object not found!" errors. -Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alice Russo [mailto:arusso@amsl.com]=20 Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:14 PM To: Dave Dolson Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? Dave, We have updated that template to use one of the current options (ipr=3D'tru= st200902') as described on http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ under "To generate the = latest boilerplate". The RFC Editor can be reached at rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Additional cont= act info is here: http://www.rfc-editor.org/contacts.html Thank you. RFC Editor/ar On Apr 17, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Dave Dolson wrote: > Hi, > (I thought maybe I should be asking someone from the RFC editor, but I co= uldn't find contact info anywhere.) > =20 > I'm trying to use this validator: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ > =20 > I'm starting from this template: http://www.rfc-editor.org/template-bare-= 05.txt > (Found from IETF tools page) > =20 > But the validator doesn't load the template; there are multiple problems. > =20 > Can you tell me which is more correct, the template or the validator? > I think the template is probably more correct, since it has, > > =20 > But the validator doesn't understand that value of "ipr". > Also confusing is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629, which indicates "fu= ll2026" as a possible value of "ipr". > =20 > Can you help me sort out which templates and tools are current? > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > David Dolson > =20 > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 13:14:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E941B304A for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMIyoPUKXG99 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EF11B3048 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so138251067pdb.1 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdXP2Dp6tgFe82uDBN0Mr4bkTPccKy2qm8Ie6nwQ03A=; b=tPH2wOpADKjWEYaPmox2MFcbMBLQ3UeQxa1D9KkcIyB+sdWCTKXAa5UTb+Dlpwo5NK MpAQNKIr1xtHz2BC0tMZjHLPVxchsnZOzeHvZiPH6b+EkQypilk8+8P+R8W8GdGSKUNH ZVomGQow1WR0rY0SveNUh8Qo4bcHFAn0k1v8EAe66ziZlY+t49ObpezXG/diw8pxhEII //hVYUbfNXWQCnEA7AZ/StqTzAZxZqvfltKMkUNukAKZbY19/FPoOUp8SG2aDjkidyhS svAygOGN1Fd1dk1fwz+zYT5crJTXA1HCAGNegf9aWnA5Do8sr18kcYjeKpUDcyqD3jH1 kc2A== X-Received: by 10.70.138.70 with SMTP id qo6mr8188359pdb.163.1429301697262; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6b4a:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6b4a:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qt4sm10881273pbc.86.2015.04.17.13.14.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <553169C6.8090803@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:15:02 +1200 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Dolson , Alice Russo References: <4DD4EAE7-5B02-418D-B644-6551461175CD@amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:14:59 -0000 Dave, On 18/04/2015 06:29, Dave Dolson wrote: > Alice, > Thanks, that worked. > > Another thing I've noted is that the tool at http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ doesn't generate working links for references to RFCs or I.Ds > > For example, this is the link generated for "BCP 78" in the boilerplate: > http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?bcp=78 Normally there are no links generated in the boilerplate. I'm not clear why you are getting a link there. > > And this is the link generated for RFC2119: > http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?rfc=2119 I assume you're referring to the HTML output format. That is indeed what it generates, but if you save the .htm file to disk, this becomes an internal link to the list of references, and the list of references has an external link to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119. No problem there. > This is the link generated for an ID: > http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/home/www/tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup?draft=draft-homma-sfc-forwarding-methods-analysis-01 And similarly for I-Ds. Mostly though, you need to worry about the text output format, which is what we post on-line. I find the HTML format useful for proof-reading. (Although I generate http://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html using XML2RFC; it looks different because of the IETF style sheet.) Brian > > > -Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alice Russo [mailto:arusso@amsl.com] > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:14 PM > To: Dave Dolson > Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? > > Dave, > > We have updated that template to use one of the current options (ipr='trust200902') as described on http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ under "To generate the latest boilerplate". > > The RFC Editor can be reached at rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Additional contact info is here: http://www.rfc-editor.org/contacts.html > > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ar > > On Apr 17, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Dave Dolson wrote: > >> Hi, >> (I thought maybe I should be asking someone from the RFC editor, but I couldn't find contact info anywhere.) >> >> I'm trying to use this validator: http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/ >> >> I'm starting from this template: http://www.rfc-editor.org/template-bare-05.txt >> (Found from IETF tools page) >> >> But the validator doesn't load the template; there are multiple problems. >> >> Can you tell me which is more correct, the template or the validator? >> I think the template is probably more correct, since it has, >> >> >> But the validator doesn't understand that value of "ipr". >> Also confusing is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2629, which indicates "full2026" as a possible value of "ipr". >> >> Can you help me sort out which templates and tools are current? >> >> Thanks, >> >> David Dolson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xml2rfc mailing list >> xml2rfc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > From nobody Fri Apr 17 13:54:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6211AC3B7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6jFiiCLxCHZ for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C19D1A8906 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47541 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjDHH-0001QJ-85; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:54:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:54:19 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:5 Message-ID: <078.d6361ec39eccedee2c6e338845887c8c@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:54:23 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by tony@att.com): I believe that using .br would work fine. And if you need a blank line between, then use .sp instead. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 13:56:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CE81B2CB8 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:56:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9p9pTL_NOtx for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0821B2AFD for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47609 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjDIp-0001q1-87; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:55:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:55:55 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:6 Message-ID: <078.1b187497dff9f8273c5761a4e47149d2@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:56:03 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by tony@att.com): (I always thought that the v1 nroff code spent WAY too much effort trying to keep indentations correct and could have been simplified drastically.) -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 13:58:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16751B2CD2 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Iia6lnzntKM for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB85B1B2CC0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47753 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjDLj-0002Ye-9S; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:58:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:58:55 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287#comment:7 Message-ID: <078.add4b0e677c1060b10fb9eb9285f6d53@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:58:58 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Comment (by arusso@amsl.com): I agree that .br seems fine. (AFAIK, the issue here is only when subcompact="yes", so .sp is not an option.) -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Fri Apr 17 14:22:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FEA1B2F0B for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzh_iwIpy18X for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA28E1B2ED0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WTL-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::68ac:f071:19ff:3455]) by WTL-EXCHP-3.sandvine.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:22:03 -0400 From: Dave Dolson To: Brian E Carpenter , Alice Russo Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? Thread-Index: AdB4jN9p2Yrh+/FPQ9OAd3z4w4RXpwAvi/kAAAPcizAABI1FAAAGZMZQ Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:22:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4DD4EAE7-5B02-418D-B644-6551461175CD@amsl.com> <553169C6.8090803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <553169C6.8090803@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.200.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc version? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:22:06 -0000 U29ycnksIEkgc2hvdWxkIGhhdmUgc2FpZCBJJ20gdXNpbmcgdGhlIFJmY01hcmt1cCBvdXRwdXQu DQpUaGlzIHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIHRoZSB3YXkgdGhlIEktRHMgYXJlIGdlbmVyYXRlZCBvbiB0b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZzoNCg0KRS5nLA0KaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaG9t bWEtc2ZjLWZvcndhcmRpbmctbWV0aG9kcy1hbmFseXNpcy0wMQ0KDQpOb3RlIHRoZSBsaW5rcyB0 byBCQ1AgNzgsIDc5IGluIHRoZSBib2lsZXJwbGF0ZS4NCg0KVGhpcyBpcyBzdHJhbmdlOyBteSBs aW5rcyBhcmUgd29ya2luZyBwcm9wZXJseSBub3cuDQpJIGNvdWxkIGhhdmUgc3dvcm4gdGhleSB3 ZXJlIGJyb2tlbi4NCg0KQW55aG93LCB0aGFua3MuDQoNCg0KLURhdmUNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3Jp Z2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBCcmlhbiBFIENhcnBlbnRlciBbbWFpbHRvOmJyaWFu LmUuY2FycGVudGVyQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0gDQpTZW50OiBGcmlkYXksIEFwcmlsIDE3LCAyMDE1IDQ6 MTUgUE0NClRvOiBEYXZlIERvbHNvbjsgQWxpY2UgUnVzc28NCkNjOiB4bWwycmZjQGlldGYub3Jn DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW3htbDJyZmNdIHhtbDJyZmMgdmVyc2lvbj8NCg0KRGF2ZSwNCk9uIDE4 LzA0LzIwMTUgMDY6MjksIERhdmUgRG9sc29uIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBBbGljZSwNCj4gVGhhbmtzLCB0 aGF0IHdvcmtlZC4NCj4gDQo+IEFub3RoZXIgdGhpbmcgSSd2ZSBub3RlZCBpcyB0aGF0IHRoZSB0 b29sIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly94bWwycmZjLmlldGYub3JnLyBkb2Vzbid0IGdlbmVyYXRlIHdvcmtpbmcg bGlua3MgZm9yIHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgdG8gUkZDcyBvciBJLkRzDQo+IA0KPiBGb3IgZXhhbXBsZSwg dGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgbGluayBnZW5lcmF0ZWQgZm9yICJCQ1AgNzgiIGluIHRoZSBib2lsZXJwbGF0 ZToNCj4gaHR0cDovL3htbDJyZmMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaG9tZS93d3cvdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvdG9v bHMvcmZjbWFya3VwL3JmY21hcmt1cD9iY3A9NzgNCg0KTm9ybWFsbHkgdGhlcmUgYXJlIG5vIGxp bmtzIGdlbmVyYXRlZCBpbiB0aGUgYm9pbGVycGxhdGUuIEknbSBub3QgY2xlYXINCndoeSB5b3Ug YXJlIGdldHRpbmcgYSBsaW5rIHRoZXJlLg0KDQo+IA0KPiBBbmQgdGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgbGluayBn ZW5lcmF0ZWQgZm9yIFJGQzIxMTk6DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly94bWwycmZjLmlldGYub3JnL2hvbWUvd3d3 L3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL3Rvb2xzL3JmY21hcmt1cC9yZmNtYXJrdXA/cmZjPTIxMTkNCg0KSSBh c3N1bWUgeW91J3JlIHJlZmVycmluZyB0byB0aGUgSFRNTCBvdXRwdXQgZm9ybWF0LiBUaGF0IGlz IGluZGVlZCB3aGF0DQppdCBnZW5lcmF0ZXMsIGJ1dCBpZiB5b3Ugc2F2ZSB0aGUgLmh0bSBmaWxl IHRvIGRpc2ssIHRoaXMgYmVjb21lcyBhbiBpbnRlcm5hbA0KbGluayB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBvZiBy ZWZlcmVuY2VzLCBhbmQgdGhlIGxpc3Qgb2YgcmVmZXJlbmNlcyBoYXMgYW4gZXh0ZXJuYWwgbGlu aw0KdG8gaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvcmZjMjExOS4gTm8gcHJvYmxlbSB0aGVy ZS4NCg0KPiBUaGlzIGlzIHRoZSBsaW5rIGdlbmVyYXRlZCBmb3IgYW4gSUQ6DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly94 bWwycmZjLmlldGYub3JnL2hvbWUvd3d3L3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL3Rvb2xzL3JmY21hcmt1cC9y ZmNtYXJrdXA/ZHJhZnQ9ZHJhZnQtaG9tbWEtc2ZjLWZvcndhcmRpbmctbWV0aG9kcy1hbmFseXNp cy0wMQ0KDQpBbmQgc2ltaWxhcmx5IGZvciBJLURzLg0KDQpNb3N0bHkgdGhvdWdoLCB5b3UgbmVl ZCB0byB3b3JyeSBhYm91dCB0aGUgdGV4dCBvdXRwdXQgZm9ybWF0LCB3aGljaCBpcyB3aGF0IHdl DQpwb3N0IG9uLWxpbmUuIEkgZmluZCB0aGUgSFRNTCBmb3JtYXQgdXNlZnVsIGZvciBwcm9vZi1y ZWFkaW5nLg0KDQooQWx0aG91Z2ggSSBnZW5lcmF0ZSBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2Fib3V0 L3Byb2Nlc3MtZG9jcy5odG1sIHVzaW5nIFhNTDJSRkM7DQppdCBsb29rcyBkaWZmZXJlbnQgYmVj YXVzZSBvZiB0aGUgSUVURiBzdHlsZSBzaGVldC4pDQoNCiAgICBCcmlhbg0KDQo+IA0KPiANCj4g LURhdmUNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBBbGlj ZSBSdXNzbyBbbWFpbHRvOmFydXNzb0BhbXNsLmNvbV0gDQo+IFNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgQXByaWwg MTcsIDIwMTUgMTI6MTQgUE0NCj4gVG86IERhdmUgRG9sc29uDQo+IENjOiB4bWwycmZjQGlldGYu b3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbeG1sMnJmY10geG1sMnJmYyB2ZXJzaW9uPw0KPiANCj4gRGF2 ZSwNCj4gDQo+IFdlIGhhdmUgdXBkYXRlZCB0aGF0IHRlbXBsYXRlIHRvIHVzZSBvbmUgb2YgdGhl IGN1cnJlbnQgb3B0aW9ucyAoaXByPSd0cnVzdDIwMDkwMicpIGFzIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBvbiBodHRw Oi8veG1sMnJmYy5pZXRmLm9yZy8gdW5kZXIgIlRvIGdlbmVyYXRlIHRoZSBsYXRlc3QgYm9pbGVy cGxhdGUiLg0KPiANCj4gVGhlIFJGQyBFZGl0b3IgY2FuIGJlIHJlYWNoZWQgYXQgcmZjLWVkaXRv ckByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy4gQWRkaXRpb25hbCBjb250YWN0IGluZm8gaXMgaGVyZTogaHR0cDov L3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9jb250YWN0cy5odG1sDQo+IA0KPiBUaGFuayB5b3UuDQo+IFJG QyBFZGl0b3IvYXINCj4gDQo+IE9uIEFwciAxNywgMjAxNSwgYXQgNjo1OCBBTSwgRGF2ZSBEb2xz b24gPGRkb2xzb25Ac2FuZHZpbmUuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCj4gDQo+PiBIaSwNCj4+IChJIHRob3Vn aHQgbWF5YmUgSSBzaG91bGQgYmUgYXNraW5nIHNvbWVvbmUgZnJvbSB0aGUgUkZDIGVkaXRvciwg YnV0IEkgY291bGRuJ3QgZmluZCBjb250YWN0IGluZm8gYW55d2hlcmUuKQ0KPj4gIA0KPj4gSSdt IHRyeWluZyB0byB1c2UgdGhpcyB2YWxpZGF0b3I6IGh0dHA6Ly94bWwycmZjLmlldGYub3JnLw0K Pj4gIA0KPj4gSSdtIHN0YXJ0aW5nIGZyb20gdGhpcyB0ZW1wbGF0ZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yZmMt ZWRpdG9yLm9yZy90ZW1wbGF0ZS1iYXJlLTA1LnR4dA0KPj4gKEZvdW5kIGZyb20gSUVURiB0b29s cyBwYWdlKQ0KPj4gIA0KPj4gQnV0IHRoZSB2YWxpZGF0b3IgZG9lc24ndCBsb2FkIHRoZSB0ZW1w bGF0ZTsgdGhlcmUgYXJlIG11bHRpcGxlIHByb2JsZW1zLg0KPj4gIA0KPj4gQ2FuIHlvdSB0ZWxs IG1lIHdoaWNoIGlzIG1vcmUgY29ycmVjdCwgdGhlIHRlbXBsYXRlIG9yIHRoZSB2YWxpZGF0b3I/ DQo+PiBJIHRoaW5rIHRoZSB0ZW1wbGF0ZSBpcyBwcm9iYWJseSBtb3JlIGNvcnJlY3QsIHNpbmNl IGl0IGhhcywNCj4+IDxyZmMgY2F0ZWdvcnk9ImluZm8iIGRvY05hbWU9ImRyYWZ0LWlldGYteG1s MnJmYy10ZW1wbGF0ZS0wNSIgaXByPSJmdWxsMzk3OCI+DQo+PiAgDQo+PiBCdXQgdGhlIHZhbGlk YXRvciBkb2Vzbid0IHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgdGhhdCB2YWx1ZSBvZiAiaXByIi4NCj4+IEFsc28gY29u ZnVzaW5nIGlzIGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL3JmYzI2MjksIHdoaWNoIGluZGlj YXRlcyAiZnVsbDIwMjYiIGFzIGEgcG9zc2libGUgdmFsdWUgb2YgImlwciIuDQo+PiAgDQo+PiBD YW4geW91IGhlbHAgbWUgc29ydCBvdXQgd2hpY2ggdGVtcGxhdGVzIGFuZCB0b29scyBhcmUgY3Vy cmVudD8NCj4+ICANCj4+IFRoYW5rcywNCj4+ICANCj4+IERhdmlkIERvbHNvbg0KPj4gIA0KPj4g X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+IHhtbDJy ZmMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PiB4bWwycmZjQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3htbDJyZmMNCj4gDQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IHhtbDJyZmMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IHht bDJyZmNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby94 bWwycmZjDQo+IA0K From nobody Sun Apr 19 10:22:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356D51A0151 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M_c_168hNj-Z for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FB41A00F0 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41889 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjsuq-00057x-6L; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:21:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:21:56 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/287#comment:8 Message-ID: <078.36524dd4ac6664f554ba58969f577ad2@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 In-Reply-To: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, tony@att.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:22:00 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in [1885]: Modified the nroff table output for PI subcompact=yes so as to produce a list, rather than a paragraph of run-together list entries. Fixes issue #287. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Apr 19 10:38:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0191A1B8E for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqBGWKzn16Fi for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE58B1A1AA3 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from henrik by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjtA0-0001BJ-2l; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:37:36 -0700 To: XML2RFC Interest Group Message-Id: From: Henrik Levkowetz Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:37:36 -0700 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: arusso@amsl.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, ietf@augustcellars.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, rpelletier@isoc.org, housley@vigilsec.com, tony@att.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: Julian Reschke , Russ Housley Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: 2.4.12 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:38:38 -0000 Hi, This announces the release of xml2rfc version 2.4.12, available for download from: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xml2rfc Release notes: For full details on all tickets, there's always the issue tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/report/. Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) From nobody Sun Apr 19 10:41:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875831A1B6A for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kaHJgLbZxYaQ for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2ED1A007F for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h205n24-s-oev-a31.ias.bredband.telia.com ([78.68.120.205]:55180 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YjtDJ-0002qO-S0; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:03 -0700 Message-ID: <5533E8A3.3040902@levkowetz.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:40:51 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XML2RFC Interest Group Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tJ5tsB72R3HuvMuBHsJfFl2fiNj4bV7wR" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.68.120.205 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tony@att.com, housley@vigilsec.com, rpelletier@isoc.org, julian.reschke@gmx.de, ietf@augustcellars.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) Archived-At: Cc: Julian Reschke , Russ Housley Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: 2.4.12 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:41:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tJ5tsB72R3HuvMuBHsJfFl2fiNj4bV7wR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Corrected release notes, now including release notes ,:-) Hi, This announces the release of xml2rfc version 2.4.12, available for downl= oad from: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xml2rfc Release notes: xml2rfc (2.4.12) ietf; urgency=3Dmedium * Modified the nroff table output for PI subcompact=3Dyes so as to prod= uce=20 a list, rather than a paragraph of run-together list entries. Fixes = issue=20 #287. * Fixed a bug where a local variable would not always be set. * Fixed the bug in 2.4.11 where xml2rfc wouldn't fetch references. * Changed the cachetest so it exposes the bug found in 2.4.10 where=20 reference resulution would fail without even attempting network acces= s. For full details on all tickets, there's always the issue tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/report/. Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) --tJ5tsB72R3HuvMuBHsJfFl2fiNj4bV7wR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVM+iqAAoJEE6bV0uPuxcaf88QAL3aUkWYDmtmioCW6rGRqii7 u8AIJsQb0mw2Po9U5y1nWkX8vFwuHrxZefxaNszTYHUxXm6F2l0dbLgWVneoChW6 TELyyKi4ASHvHHSPaGwEVHaV1tr/1j5x1xP2VLLcKE/+rl/Y1J/ezSZWtcsxHinP lFCVeuhrtNBD8wOKBqRr0zm2skhwUWkdyF7WPwVh6tGkmb/VPf2LBzirXjusJNm3 evgY+oiOoRuhEyO6AUs/+4KYipaUc/1oDJ5wj5hAq0ZllgqzGaxqmXBsjGCEAipI 38mlAa+WIBym0b/pd9sutj/sYQ0xejYH+KGQYpTHUo2ZtkinOBk8suTv+69HSF4S 7uQrT90q2Z8Fgf58MkXzPzmFIzJDwiygCfyvZ57uvvr+ccHOGUEzCD612izP5+Dw +MxSPEmW1nGPOBGQWmtnHhvVw26PYsqgit22svT7T7DTnQL3YfEJTWSwTi/RPrXo 6X2GVfZ7WKiAl4za3lSU5JZ2AdEfwUqFOGWXEF+Z4SYrf5vhY/gbdzdcXNx5od7N zX9rRh+D3gcP9BnpBDfn8tpFtnnO7zHCsETlxNDlqzuCKeig6McIRTWP0QsJy0F0 ytuevMER9A08RKP5sfmp91kQaBk3vaYJMCu8+w7UNUNFYBeq+t//upRIzPe75qRa QzzSRPDVEm2vH4QbTAzs =r5ac -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tJ5tsB72R3HuvMuBHsJfFl2fiNj4bV7wR-- From nobody Mon Apr 20 06:19:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DE51B2B63 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 06:19:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcwopBz361Ei for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 06:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232561B2B5A for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 06:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46468 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YkBbd-0004RD-4f; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 06:19:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, ott@mirix.org X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:19:21 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/291 Message-ID: <061.46bb4edb53c7b270c4f77e7485c41613@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 291 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, ott@mirix.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: [xml2rfc] #291 (Version 2 cli): Replace scripts option with entry_points option in setup.py X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:19:55 -0000 #291: Replace scripts option with entry_points option in setup.py setup.py uses the scripts option to install the xml2rfc script. Under Microsoft Windows this has the disadvantage that Windows is not able to directly execute the script. [https://pythonhosted.org/setuptools/setuptools.html#automatic-script- creation setuptools is able to generate an executable if the entry_points is used]. -- ---------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: ott@mirix.org | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | ---------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Tue Apr 21 10:18:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79201A8874 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qjotcw7HTcV for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785121A7025 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60139 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykbof-0001WA-3k; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:18:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:18:33 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/292 Message-ID: <063.a19d75d9d0cf39ac51a04f96fc001903@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 292 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: [xml2rfc] #292 (Version 2 cli): subcompact oddity when turned on/off multiple times X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:18:35 -0000 #292: subcompact oddity when turned on/off multiple times It seems the PI subcompact="no" is being disregarded when there is more than one instance of setting subcompact within the file (and some other condition that I don't know). Background: In general, the RPC uses compact="yes" and subcompact="no" to get a blank line between list items, but there are situations where the preference is to turn subcompact on/off within a document. In this specific case, the author chose to do that. (With v1, it could be turned on/off within a file. And I thought this worked with a past v2 release, but it doesn't work with 2.4.10 or 2.4.12.) Attached files: a) draft-jwa.original.xml (as submitted by the author of draft-ietf-jose- json-web-algorithms-40.txt) b) draft-jwa.stripped.xml (I removed all the subsequent subcompact PIs -- and then the output is as desired.) c) sample.xml (It works fine in a short doc with a couple instances of turning it on/off.) In the text output from (a): {{{ 1. Generate a digital signature of the JWS Signing Input using ECDSA P-256 SHA-256 with the desired private key. The output will be the pair (R, S), where R and S are 256 bit unsigned integers. 2. Turn R and S into octet sequences in big endian order, with each array being be 32 octets long. The octet sequence representations MUST NOT be shortened to omit any leading zero octets contained in the values. 3. Concatenate the two octet sequences in the order R and then S. (Note that many ECDSA implementations will directly produce this concatenation as their output.) 4. The resulting 64 octet sequence is the JWS Signature value. }}} Desired output (and as it was in draft-ietf-jose-json-web- algorithms-40.txt -- which presumably was made using draft- jwa.original.xml ) {{{ 1. Generate a digital signature of the JWS Signing Input using ECDSA P-256 SHA-256 with the desired private key. The output will be the pair (R, S), where R and S are 256 bit unsigned integers. 2. Turn R and S into octet sequences in big endian order, with each array being be 32 octets long. The octet sequence representations MUST NOT be shortened to omit any leading zero octets contained in the values. 3. Concatenate the two octet sequences in the order R and then S. (Note that many ECDSA implementations will directly produce this concatenation as their output.) 4. The resulting 64 octet sequence is the JWS Signature value. }}} -- -----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | -----------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc