From nobody Mon Oct 9 17:37:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ED413431A for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:37:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.521 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85yvjA00XWDv for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FDFF133063 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:37:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=270; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507595857; x=1508805457; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=oBx2+qvbtx/0idBbAlV1nJNC/G/qe9/wNo0fhfwgGrQ=; b=ev3TNtzwMUPnj6nTDWB4iKeS2uusLAqOZsWqYceMBBDtYRT1suOGcCK8 8sG76CTu8xaIcCZkC8/Nwv0nhluzEn/dJfAIsc6bGNrm1KSye7/np8tdc jt+EaMGxZwxBAIWpnfRMmLJGPW0qeTDygaDvIIwE7xe7QmKvupEQUMO9O w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CYAAA2FdxZ/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg12BUi6OEqgZghIKhTuEPD8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFWT8SAT5CJgE?= =?us-ascii?q?EDg2KKKo/iycBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBASCDLYICgVGGUIk7BaE1ApRcggQBG?= =?us-ascii?q?IVviwiVLQIRGQGBOAEfOIEOeBVJhx2HbIEQAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,502,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="14788797" Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Oct 2017 00:37:36 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9A0baiq006174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:37:36 GMT Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:37:35 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 19:37:35 -0500 From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" To: Anima-bootstrap CC: "Pete Beal (pbeal)" Thread-Topic: anima BRSKI in IETF-100 Hackathon Thread-Index: AdNBX+ZDrdev1m98ROii5zOsIhItRA== Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:37:35 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.108.6] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Anima-bootstrap] anima BRSKI in IETF-100 Hackathon X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:37:38 -0000 Hi all, I think I haven't seen any hackathon discussions in this list about the BRS= KI work. Please correct me if I am wrong.=20 Are folks planning to join the Hackathon in Singapore to showcase and test = the latest version of the BRSKI draft? Rgs, Panos From nobody Mon Oct 9 18:42:14 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EED132D22 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:42:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivWKJSdWa487 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB856124207 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB394E00A; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:47:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032FB8071B; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:42:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: "Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" cc: Anima-bootstrap , "Pete Beal \(pbeal\)" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] anima BRSKI in IETF-100 Hackathon X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 01:42:13 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) wrote: > I think I haven't seen any hackathon discussions in this list about the > BRSKI work. Please correct me if I am wrong. > Are folks planning to join the Hackathon in Singapore to showcase and > test the latest version of the BRSKI draft? We've talked about having a virtual hackathon, which is neither dead nor alive, just not yet worked out. Since it's virtual, we don't have to be constrained by IETF100, at which there won't be enough of physically present to matter. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAlncJXIACgkQgItw+93Q 3WWLVwf+O9G1Uzqj9ZGtSh8pVuy4kbZJu1R/wO0nE5LtLua5IowylNpPWEh+7feM 88bqZdMfFg/HGgPNYbpXDd9Qol6UAv7alVexGTfXkCZrFQodtVit68IYEC/SIBoD 5PXBqtrNGS9PTHJ6wM5Gv+GLo6O+FGwvBKoz53dZrg3847GIyanh5hVWwNK3qRFa H8YePWHRyTos/fccblQ4hPYv/jZStfGH+oKpo4apKy/z/UZnxUKaSMUSBygcEHOZ 0paH1mYeQoPnMiIxC23y2JsdEBVNZiWdrGNvjF2eO5MBs7cBQImIWfcwgcVHdIQJ u4pp0ZUoSDQspVSKPt9Sws/tKPtpag== =DWdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--