From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu Jul 21 00:35:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1DB21F889F for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:35:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.382 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.783, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjSjjSNewzol for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CE0FA21F889A for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2011 07:35:37 -0000 Received: from p508FD8CF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [80.143.216.207] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 21 Jul 2011 09:35:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Pa9ot/J8Pi0JtS2uRMcUu85R497Kd2ExVJdtXLj ce1/4/T0C0Wad9 Message-ID: <4E27D6C2.1040205@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:35:30 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "codesprints@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: [codesprints] room for code sprint X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:35:41 -0000 Hi, is there already a room assigned? The Wiki page doesn't say... Best regards, Julian From henrik@levkowetz.com Thu Jul 21 06:16:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F0021F8B04 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:16:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxGEaNIECt9Z for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEC821F8997 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:50290 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjt6W-0005Rp-9H; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:15:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4E282688.1070306@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:15:52 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <4E27D6C2.1040205@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E27D6C2.1040205@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: julian.reschke@gmx.de, codesprints@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: "codesprints@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [codesprints] room for code sprint X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:16:01 -0000 Hi Julian, On 2011-07-21 09:35 Julian Reschke said: > is there already a room assigned? The Wiki page doesn't say... It's in room 2000D. I've updated the wiki. Best regards, Henrik From glen@amsl.com Sun Jul 24 09:18:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0C721F8A6C; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:18:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v87rWPumIS2k; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EF821F8A4D; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AEE7A1C38260; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:18:39 -0700 From: Glen To: iaoc@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, iab@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, tools-development@ietf.org Message-ID: <20110724161839.GA20929@amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: [codesprints] Glen is here in Quebec X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:18:40 -0000 Dear IETF leadership and volunteers... As a number of you have expressed interest in meeting with me at Quebec, I wanted to mention that I did make it to Quebec and am at IETF81. So, if any of you wish to discuss operational items, server or network issues, website or other related questions, engage in any witty (or witless) banter, administer a paddling, or anything of that sort, please feel free to come visit me! I am sitting at the registration desk, where I will be today, Monday and Tuesday from mid-morning until around 5PM each today, so please do come by and say Hi! I am also available on Jabber, so please add me to your list: glen@amsl.com I look forward to seeing many of you online and in person at IETF81! Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) From henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org Wed Jul 27 14:15:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC4621F8B08 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:15:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6aPFOyW4BSQC for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [194.146.105.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2BE21F87D9 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from henrik by merlot.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QmBRR-0003tC-5C; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:14:57 +0200 To: codesprints@ietf.org, henrik@levkowetz.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com Message-Id: From: Henrik Levkowetz Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:14:57 +0200 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: adam@nostrum.com, amorris@amsl.com, avezza@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com, codesprints@ietf.org, fenner@fenron.net, glen@amsl.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, housley@vigilsec.com, kmoreland@amsl.com, rjs@nostrum.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, smccammon@amsl.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, smccammon@amsl.com, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com, kmoreland@amsl.com Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.57 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:15:08 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, v3.57, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: ietfdb (3.57) * Merged [3254] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com: Added a link to the ARO search including the IESG lists * Merged [3249] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com: Allowing adding documents in AD is watching state in addition to the default Publication Requested state. Fixes issue #684 * Merged [3245] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Removes the "Change State" button and makes changing state a link further up on the form. This fixes bug 683, but creates a new one that we will need to address later - editing the state of an RFC that is going through the iesg process again (for going to draft in place for example) will need followup once the changes to get an rfc into that state easily are made. * Merged [3246] from adam@nostrum.com: Adding page to allow viewing meeting slot requests as they are made. There's no link to these yet. * Merged [3240] from adam@nostrum.com: Added csv output format for meeting agenda information, to assist external applications (e.g., Android app, iPhone app) in harvesting and displaying meeting agenda info. * Merged [3182] from adam@nostrum.com: Fix for bug 677 -- no longer assume that code sprint will always be scheduled. * Merged [3181] from adam@nostrum.com: Fix for bug 676 * Merged [3166] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Simple changes to EditInfoForm field initialization * Various bugfixes and admin enhancements from henrik@levkowetz.com: - Some enhancements to the admin for IDInternal - Fix a bug where the wrong text was shown for IPR declarations which specified that licensing terms would be announced later (option d). - Fix a bug where the plenary entries in the html agenda didn't have links to the room map. - Enhance the admin list page for Stream a bit. - Add some debug output utility functions. - Tweak the admin list for WgMeetingSession to show wg acronym instead of group id. The new version is available through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.57' Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) From mlarson@amsl.com Thu Jul 28 09:45:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138775E8005 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hrvj9Uyuxfy9 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD321F8CC6 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5611C38216; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c1a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c1a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U90lv57M26tZ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (134.108.101.97.cfl.res.rr.com [97.101.108.134]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CF18C1C38214; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Matt Larson In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:45:07 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44E47903-EBB2-4418-9428-C3214D4C9074@amsl.com> References: To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, codesprints@ietf.org, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, kmoreland@amsl.com, smccammon@amsl.com, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com Subject: Re: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.57 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:45:10 -0000 Release 3.57 has been deployed. Matt On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release,=20 > v3.57, generated when running the mkrelease script. >=20 > Release notes: >=20 > ietfdb (3.57) > * Merged [3254] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com:=20 > Added a link to the ARO search including the IESG lists=20 > * Merged [3249] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com:=20 > Allowing adding documents in AD is watching state in addition to = the=20 > default Publication Requested state. Fixes issue #684=20 > * Merged [3245] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:=20 > Removes the "Change State" button and makes changing state a link=20= > further up on the form. This fixes bug 683, but creates a new one = that > we will need to address later - editing the state of an RFC that is = going > through the iesg process again (for going to draft in place for = example) > will need followup once the changes to get an rfc into that state = easily > are made. > * Merged [3246] from adam@nostrum.com:=20 > Adding page to allow viewing meeting slot requests as they are = made.=20 > There's no link to these yet.=20 > * Merged [3240] from adam@nostrum.com:=20 > Added csv output format for meeting agenda information, to assist > external applications (e.g., Android app, iPhone app) in harvesting > and displaying meeting agenda info.=20 > * Merged [3182] from adam@nostrum.com:=20 > Fix for bug 677 -- no longer assume that code sprint will always be=20= > scheduled.=20 > * Merged [3181] from adam@nostrum.com:=20 > Fix for bug 676=20 > * Merged [3166] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:=20 > Simple changes to EditInfoForm field initialization=20 > * Various bugfixes and admin enhancements from henrik@levkowetz.com: > - Some enhancements to the admin for IDInternal > - Fix a bug where the wrong text was shown for IPR declarations = which=20 > specified that licensing terms would be announced later (option = d). > - Fix a bug where the plenary entries in the html agenda didn't = have=20 > links to the room map. > - Enhance the admin list page for Stream a bit. > - Add some debug output utility functions. > - Tweak the admin list for WgMeetingSession to show wg acronym = instead of=20 > group id. >=20 > The new version is available through SVN checkout, with > 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.57' >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Henrik > (via the mkrelease script) >=20 > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints >=20 ------------------------------------------- Matthew Larson, Asst. IT Director Association Management Solutions Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 http://www.amsl.com From henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org Thu Jul 28 10:11:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4D321F8865 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOmYyXmwWC48 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [194.146.105.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D32721F880C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:df8:0:32:e2f8:47ff:fe1b:d17a] (port=53845 helo=dhcp-2501.meeting.ietf.org) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QmU6u-0004bR-Ls; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4E319821.4020708@merlot.tools.ietf.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:10:57 -0400 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Larson References: <44E47903-EBB2-4418-9428-C3214D4C9074@amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <44E47903-EBB2-4418-9428-C3214D4C9074@amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:df8:0:32:e2f8:47ff:fe1b:d17a X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mlarson@amsl.com, codesprints@ietf.org, henrik@levkowetz.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, rjs@nostrum.com, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, smccammon@amsl.com, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com, kmoreland@amsl.com, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, codesprints@ietf.org, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, kmoreland@amsl.com, smccammon@amsl.com, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com Subject: Re: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.57 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:11:28 -0000 Thank you, Matt! Henrik On 2011-07-28 12:45 Matt Larson said the following: > Release 3.57 has been deployed. > > Matt > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, >> v3.57, generated when running the mkrelease script. >> >> Release notes: >> >> ietfdb (3.57) >> * Merged [3254] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com: >> Added a link to the ARO search including the IESG lists >> * Merged [3249] from suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com: >> Allowing adding documents in AD is watching state in addition to the >> default Publication Requested state. Fixes issue #684 >> * Merged [3245] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: >> Removes the "Change State" button and makes changing state a link >> further up on the form. This fixes bug 683, but creates a new one that >> we will need to address later - editing the state of an RFC that is going >> through the iesg process again (for going to draft in place for example) >> will need followup once the changes to get an rfc into that state easily >> are made. >> * Merged [3246] from adam@nostrum.com: >> Adding page to allow viewing meeting slot requests as they are made. >> There's no link to these yet. >> * Merged [3240] from adam@nostrum.com: >> Added csv output format for meeting agenda information, to assist >> external applications (e.g., Android app, iPhone app) in harvesting >> and displaying meeting agenda info. >> * Merged [3182] from adam@nostrum.com: >> Fix for bug 677 -- no longer assume that code sprint will always be >> scheduled. >> * Merged [3181] from adam@nostrum.com: >> Fix for bug 676 >> * Merged [3166] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: >> Simple changes to EditInfoForm field initialization >> * Various bugfixes and admin enhancements from henrik@levkowetz.com: >> - Some enhancements to the admin for IDInternal >> - Fix a bug where the wrong text was shown for IPR declarations which >> specified that licensing terms would be announced later (option d). >> - Fix a bug where the plenary entries in the html agenda didn't have >> links to the room map. >> - Enhance the admin list page for Stream a bit. >> - Add some debug output utility functions. >> - Tweak the admin list for WgMeetingSession to show wg acronym instead of >> group id. >> >> The new version is available through SVN checkout, with >> 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.57' >> >> Regards, >> >> Henrik >> (via the mkrelease script) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> codesprints mailing list >> codesprints@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints >> > > ------------------------------------------- > Matthew Larson, Asst. IT Director > Association Management Solutions > Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning > 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 > http://www.amsl.com > > From glen@amsl.com Sat Jul 30 17:47:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD8E21F84DC; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.496 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.973, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOQzAmFL2TWj; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EB221F8669; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25A381C380E6; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:47:44 -0700 From: Glen To: iaoc@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org Message-ID: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, lars.eggert@gmail.com, iljitsch@muada.com, fred@cisco.com Subject: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:47:51 -0000 Dear IETF Leadership and IPV6 Experts: As you know, for some time AMS has been planning an upgraded primary internet connection for the IETF and our other clients (including the RFC Editor.) I am pleased to announce that, as of earlier today, the installation and initial testing of that new connection has been completed, and the new circuit is ready for us to use. Our old/current circuit is a 10MPBS fiber connection, which had workable IPV6 service that has served us well. However, although it was presented natively to us at the router, that IPV6 service did have some tunnelling components in it, and that was not the optimal configuration. The new circuit is a 45MBPS fiber connection, so there is a huge speed increase right from the start. In recent days, especially during the last meeting, I and others saw some slowness during peak meeting times... this should return us to full speed and alleviate all of those issues. (We are also maintaining additional infrastructure to further calm traffic behind the scenes.) But more importantly, and the reason I'm emailing each of you, is that this new circuit has true native dual-stack IPV6 service, complete with BGP, and the ability for us to add and support additional blocks, connections, AS numbers, and so forth. I am prepared to move the IETF over to the new circuit now, but before I do, I thought it best to contact each of you and let you know what's happening. It was actually Iljitsch who reminded me that I wanted to do this... as I was looking for a specific bit of data about BGP today, Google led me to http://www.bgpexpert.com/ and when I clicked on the link "My BGP Book", I laughed out loud with pleasure to see Iljitsch's name on the cover. Like many of you, Iljitsch was instrumental in helping with the IETF website redesign, and I am asking all of you for your help now. Before we cut the IETF over, I'm asking those of you who care to do this type of thing to have "a look" at our new circuit, run your various tests and examinations that you are all so good at, and let me know if there are any immediate issues, or concerns, that I should take back to AT&T before we cut over. Here are the relevant details: Internal IPV4 LAN IP address: 12.22.58.1/24 Internal IPV6 LAN IP address: 2001:1890:123a::1/56 I know that many of you are busy, and returning home from the IETF, but since this is so important to you and the IETF generally, it is my hope that those of you who wish to can have a quick look to make sure that this circuit is working appropriately, and give me a "thumbs up" or a problem report as appropriate. (To cut down on traffic, I'll ask each of you to reply directly to me where possible and appropriate, so we don't flood each other. I know some of you were duplicated on this email, but I wanted to get the word out to everyone as quickly as possible.) Everyone at AT&T has worked extremely hard over the past months and weeks to bring this circuit to us, and to make it as perfect as possible. I've told them that the eyes of the IETF are on this circuit; likewise the eyes of all of AT&T are now waiting for any report either way. I would like to cut the IETF over to this new circuit now, but in order to give everyone time to respond I am going to wait a few days to do the move. Please do take whatever chance you have to look things over, and make sure things are operating to your collective expectations. An ounce of prevention now could prevent TONS of headaches later. Thank you for your assistance, and I look forward to bringing us online quickly. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) From glen@amsl.com Sat Jul 30 18:41:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7FA11E8074; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:41:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.481 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSFy+9Llxvay; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E4821F863C; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEFB51C380E9; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:41:38 -0700 From: Glen To: Fred Baker Message-ID: <20110731014138.GA14436@amsl.com> References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, iljitsch@muada.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:41:37 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:34:40PM -0700, Fred Baker wrote: > Not entirely sure what you're asking me to do. Sounds like > "generate a bunch of traffic and verify that it works." Close? > I should be home around midnight PDT tonight. I have a script > (developed for IPv6 day) that spiders a set of sites. If it is > helpful to you, I can run that tonight with a view to finding all > the web pages I can find and kicking up some dust. It will be > limited to about 2 MBPS in the nature of the case, and as I have an > HE tunnel it won't really test PMTU. But if there's something to > kick loose there is some probability that it will. Is that what > you're looking for? Hi Fred - Thanks for your email! In response to your question, I guess I would say, "Well, not exactly." The IETF is not hooked up to this new circuit yet, so there is really nothing on it yet. There is only the router itself, and our internal default gateway IP address pair, against which people can test. So my email was targeted more at the IPV6 junkies ... I mean, EXPERTS ... who like to do traceroute reports, check path MTU, and do other circuit-specific testing things. I'm already getting reports from some, for example, who are reporting much better rtt and transit times compared to our existing circuit... a positive trend that bodes well for us all. But I'm equally interested in finding any negative issues, problems, or red flags pertaining to the new circuit and its setup and configuration... *before* we cut over. More of a "due dilgence" kind of thing. I personally think the circuit is top-grade, and is going to be just perfect for us. But there are many in the IETF who know more about the internal details of IPV6 than I do. Those are they who come to me from time to time with all kinds of less-well-known details about our circuit that they'd like to see changed. This new circuit is my response to all those requests. I just want to make sure, as much as I can, that everyone is happy with what they see before I cut us over... or at least that there are no red flags at this stage. Thanks! Glen From glen@amsl.com Sun Jul 31 09:13:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334A621F8866; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.341 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.341 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.259, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a7nWgkWObDz9; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F4421F887C; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE9B83A200D; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:13:59 -0700 From: Glen To: Iljitsch van Beijnum Message-ID: <20110731161359.GD13716@amsl.com> References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, fred@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:13:56 -0000 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 02:42:49PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > I'm glad I was able to make you laugh. If your BGP question wasn't > answered, let me know. I think I'm good for now... :-) > Possible path MTU discovery issues that Fred mentioned are > probably the most important issue to test for. However, we can only > really do that if there is a live host running some kind of TCP > service available behind the circuit. Would it be possible to park a > temporary HTTP server there and serve up a few files of different > sizes? Including a few large ones so we can test download bandwidth. > Iljitsch I'm moving our other servers over to the new circuit today, so there will be live hosts later. I don't have anything temporary I can do, but once I get, for example, amsl.com moved over I can put some files there you can download. I'm not too concerned about bandwidth - I did extensive testing of that prior to setting anything up (so I could get a true picture) and the bandwidth and performance seem perfect. I'm more concerned about IPV6 issues - anything that might make us say "Wait" with respect to cutting over. So far the only negative I've gotten is that from some routes, AT&T still does not expose their internal routing. I have raised that issue with them in the past, and will do so again; however, that's not technically related to our circuit. It was more of an issue when we were tunnelling (our old/ current circuit), but with the new circuit it seems like routes just go directly to us from many different locations, so this is less of an issue for us. I don't pretend to understand all the details about "why" they are doing this - I get that it's undesireable and I know that they're aware of it - but my leverage to fight that particular battle is limited. Once the dust settles I will raise it with them again; right now, I'm just trying to get at whether this circuit is "good" and we want to move to it, or whether there is a problem that I need to go back and get fixed. Glen From fred@cisco.com Sat Jul 30 18:34:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4E221F863E; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.013 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.414, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rmF5TXLNikrW; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0372221F863C; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=1347; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312076091; x=1313285691; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y+sq7u9htO5edFCAiBGgBXVYXND4tC1FfOTjhL3APt0=; b=bJBTlVMO0cQBxAOpZ4J4PkdCKt24N03nHSPR24GFbRQgMo4Rs9OKD3mN u6DsMx/oaE5Io1CPZ9KPYyYvYqAC5SJfVx87qXupc9LggzaMoQ+1UvN6z nkqiiQ81uZQAIuGSIA4ecwCxzg4trSHQ/qHZes075aQhT+VmdWRkfizZp Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAD6wNE6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABBp2R3gUABAQEBAgESASc/BQsLRlcGNYdKoVEBnTOFY18Eh1qLIYUHi30 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,293,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="8134629" Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2011 01:34:50 +0000 Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn3-971.cisco.com [10.21.67.203]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6V1Ymfm023281; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:34:48 GMT Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:49 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Fred Baker In-Reply-To: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:40 -0700 Message-Id: References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> To: Glen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:56:57 -0700 Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, iljitsch@muada.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:34:49 -0000 On Jul 30, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Glen wrote: > Everyone at AT&T has worked extremely hard over the past months and = weeks to > bring this circuit to us, and to make it as perfect as possible. I've = told > them that the eyes of the IETF are on this circuit; likewise the eyes = of all > of AT&T are now waiting for any report either way. I would like to = cut the > IETF over to this new circuit now, but in order to give everyone time = to > respond I am going to wait a few days to do the move. Please do take = whatever > chance you have to look things over, and make sure things are = operating to > your collective expectations. An ounce of prevention now could = prevent TONS > of headaches later. Not entirely sure what you're asking me to do. Sounds like "generate a = bunch of traffic and verify that it works." Close? I should be home around midnight PDT tonight. I have a script (developed = for IPv6 day) that spiders a set of sites. If it is helpful to you, I = can run that tonight with a view to finding all the web pages I can find = and kicking up some dust. It will be limited to about 2 MBPS in the = nature of the case, and as I have an HE tunnel it won't really test = PMTU. But if there's something to kick loose there is some probability = that it will. Is that what you're looking for?= From iljitsch@muada.com Sun Jul 31 05:43:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF3721F876A; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:43:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.437 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fM5nO60kWKWS; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C283D21F875E; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1289:f1d1:9782:911:2e65] ([IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1289:f1d1:9782:911:2e65]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p6VCh5rG004187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:43:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Iljitsch van Beijnum In-Reply-To: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:42:49 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> To: Glen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:56:57 -0700 Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, fred@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:43:26 -0000 On 31 Jul 2011, at 2:47 , Glen wrote: > as I was > looking for a specific bit of data about BGP today, Google led me to=20= > http://www.bgpexpert.com/ > and when I clicked on the link "My BGP Book", I laughed out loud with = pleasure > to see Iljitsch's name on the cover. I'm glad I was able to make you laugh. If your BGP question wasn't = answered, let me know. > I'm asking those of you who care to do this type of thing to have > "a look" at our new circuit, run your various tests and examinations = that you > are all so good at, and let me know if there are any immediate issues, = or > concerns, that I should take back to AT&T before we cut over. Possible path MTU discovery issues that Fred mentioned are probably the = most important issue to test for. However, we can only really do that if = there is a live host running some kind of TCP service available behind = the circuit. Would it be possible to park a temporary HTTP server there = and serve up a few files of different sizes? Including a few large ones = so we can test download bandwidth. Iljitsch From glen@amsl.com Sun Jul 31 16:04:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54F321F8743; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.382 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.218, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5U+pOrcvxzpu; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4731A21F871E; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20AB51C380E6; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:04:37 -0700 From: Glen To: Fred Baker Message-ID: <20110731230437.GD26586@amsl.com> References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> <02FE279C-4DB1-4687-85D2-8D4247F75263@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02FE279C-4DB1-4687-85D2-8D4247F75263@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, Iljitsch van Beijnum , iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:04:33 -0000 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:19:02PM -0700, Fred Baker wrote: > On Jul 31, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > Possible path MTU discovery issues that Fred mentioned are > > probably the most important issue to test for. However, we can only > > really do that if there is a live host running some kind of TCP > > service available behind the circuit. Would it be possible to park a > > temporary HTTP server there and serve up a few files of different > > sizes? Including a few large ones so we can test download bandwidth. > Another way of asking the same question I did. Note that I'm on an > HE tunnel, and therefore will have PMTU questions anyway - and never > had any to complain about. I am working now on moving all AMS servers - except for the IETF/ISOC/RFCP servers - to the new circuit now. They should be online and good to within four hours from the time of this message. After that, you should all be able to test against www.amsl.com for both IPV4 and IPV6. DNS will be up to date, but it will be 12.22.58.20 and 2001:1890:123a::1:14 when it's live. Glen From fred@cisco.com Sun Jul 31 15:19:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7FD21F881C; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.406, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFOeIvQ04XTr; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09DA21F8797; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2048; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312150752; x=1313360352; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ieLGVeH55TGrA81itzIMDp2iussegzA7BGlX041MPjs=; b=Lmp4TdYx7kPOIrn+Z9/8g3qjyAkSzpba0cKQcByhSR9P9WRWRZe27MpM bk7e8yCg22nzomFlRjBrOUVCbmcR3U4WFCqNYkWMu6tvma1v9PCgWLNGL BeFgfn4sKxJZqncUkUBA6i8jg0q2CB7+/elfxzI82lxRjZlULt/F7nhzh k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAHjUNU6rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABAp153gUABAQEBAgESASc/BQsLEQMBAgEuTwgGEyKHSqFvAZ1BhWNfBIdaiyGFB4t9 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,297,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="8255775" Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2011 22:19:11 +0000 Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6VMJAcq014166; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:19:10 GMT Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:11 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:11 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Fred Baker In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:19:02 -0700 Message-Id: <02FE279C-4DB1-4687-85D2-8D4247F75263@cisco.com> References: <20110731004744.GC5789@amsl.com> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:26:43 -0700 Cc: olaf@NLnetLabs.nl, wgchairs@ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, it@ietf.amsl.com, dow.street@linquest.com, iaoc@ietf.org, lars.eggert@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:19:08 -0000 On Jul 31, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > Possible path MTU discovery issues that Fred mentioned are probably = the most important issue to test for. However, we can only really do = that if there is a live host running some kind of TCP service available = behind the circuit. Would it be possible to park a temporary HTTP server = there and serve up a few files of different sizes? Including a few large = ones so we can test download bandwidth. Another way of asking the same question I did. Note that I'm on an HE = tunnel, and therefore will have PMTU questions anyway - and never had = any to complain about. Begin forwarded message: > From: Fred Baker > Date: July 31, 2011 3:16:10 PM PDT > To: Glen > Subject: Re: NEW AMS AT&T IPV6 CIRCUIT READY - TEST REQUEST >=20 >=20 > On Jul 30, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Glen wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:57:25PM -0700, Fred Baker wrote: >>> OK. =46rom my home, I'm one of those junkies. What's the address of >>> the router I should test? >>=20 >> The IPV4 address is 12.22.58.1/24, and IPV6 is 2001:1890:123a::1/56. >=20 > I ran an 8 hour ping study starting this morning - I had an outage = when I got home last night. >=20 > --- 12.22.58.1 ping statistics --- > 28800 packets transmitted, 28800 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 28.817/41.651/1556.058/18.499 ms >=20 > --- 2001:1890:123a::1 ping6 statistics --- > 28800 packets transmitted, 28738 packets received, 0.2% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev =3D 63.073/75.310/1131.349/17.028 ms >=20 > I can't say I see a lot to complain about. Next question will be how = they behave under load. When are you planning to put the circuit into = play? The one thing I would complain about in this is the packet loss rate - a = ping once a second shouldn't trigger loss. That said, I don't know what = link or links the loss was coming from. So I hesitate to lay it at any = given given door.=