Subject: Re: [core] WGLC draft-ietf-core-observe-11: support for pre-configured observers ?

From: "Dijk, Esko" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:57:33 +0000

> Then what Esko proposes would be just a Server self-request with a different observer than the registering node.
But that would not be supported by -observe, because it does not have the feature of sending notifications to a different node?

Esko

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Fossati [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 20:17
To: Klaus Hartke
Cc: Dijk, Esko; core ([email-masked])
Subject: Re: [core] WGLC draft-ietf-core-observe-11: support for pre-configured observers ?

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Klaus Hartke <[email-masked]> wrote:
> - IIRC, Zach had some use-case where he wanted to send notifications
> to a different node than the one registering.

Then what Esko proposes would be just a Server self-request with a different observer than the registering node.

________________________________
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.