From nobody Wed Aug 7 10:58:16 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74654120284 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpcjU3UbGzPI for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB24120691 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1565200693; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=uG8/LtEhovjremb7He0uyKYmVpnF/w/Y0ES/6A+1TEk=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=Zf3Sbu0Q5YqKtB5ffZz+/mmY8/oZ58VldBsbyZpwlwDchCyjvE97GrT3AHqIixgVTGuEsj jVvEN1e3yqWiDgjFKzwayh0Q2uI/8sSxdXu3ddSI7lLtWPk3oyRk6h63N/+ZHVKBglA3hC 3ZLAkcLyDXsiQSDqd6orYvOCi4O67io=; Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:58:13 +0100 To: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" Cc: "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" From: Alexey Melnikov Message-ID: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:58:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E8C253A5D050141A4521FE63" Content-Language: en-GB Archived-At: Subject: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:58:15 -0000 --------------E8C253A5D050141A4521FE63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Crypto Review Panel members! According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the following: 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019. 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done by October 30th 2019. We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that). Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them). Best Regards, Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) --------------E8C253A5D050141A4521FE63 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Crypto Review Panel members!

According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the following:
1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019.
2)=C2=A0Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including independent reviews).=C2=A0If additional explanations are needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers.=C2=A0Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done by October 30th 2019.

We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that).

Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them).

Best Regards,
Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
--------------E8C253A5D050141A4521FE63-- From nobody Wed Aug 7 11:13:06 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4551205D4 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.497 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bwLmtEqnGEUW for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93A301204D1 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id b17so64738905lff.7 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=00qGhbVkgCKhQhns+OU5kLPAAyU1BaB7+bKS6ovlMAw=; b=XBkJngtd1zbQdoo5kh6kLFuoiqKhFKntrqYawcwWQbMraGoeflYP8xJJP4gltbZirB dYdMeVIVT2em0EqqFjgCEbiAm6NMsS0GnoWN+j3ZkLtzA6BSK/TET/9V6Sa13d9Jtzad wQ684qJcT8JtZBY0gjz0L2d+YCa8xiul7sLfUoorRryRN1+aryZTCx6s932xBA8Gc8l7 xAFr5f20gNjcke7Nm1BYaEzshQ6HvPSBMafKdal8Bt/07Hs29larVX6ZdRuAOtPSw1Gu ZI4TQHDh+/Ice9u44474EbyL8V6ShyDJzLUvKD7ohqDgtf4/82IhsaIGN4LGSNLzJ0ZP 4N9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=00qGhbVkgCKhQhns+OU5kLPAAyU1BaB7+bKS6ovlMAw=; b=Vvi52j16iqMTSmvViDPAe0Bn4ePBa8jf3E2dXIzsiAF/boKaqSODxLDtMV7T67fdm2 nyqr68mFb1FiPrPf9Zjbcycjgre5EYq36Tdv9GYoz/LszefWRPLkZlWZgNPlybOrLSZ7 6Vt9ksJoswnUyApeokDAZfl0ZzlURGpEwAKSyT9kTZLhgKP4GZoE4zAoDoR4wgMVgz3Q lMivWIBZaqprzu/rDYdg0BdoyvxpC0HoMF2QHQlrungilLmwGj7XHmoWreeFPHYMg9V4 qLu1D93JgT/j88kMGpso/Hy5gQwvwcBmfx0YvJrm67WmSdaqe0E1wX0ABvYqw/gMMNr8 YAVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7NIKSAfbg6ZNS/aRlpurwf1o8LfiNR847gTf5jzD2tFEfSg68 fFb735t5x8yu3o6V+ITN/lhZcSnOCclmuN9d8oY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmuReDXCzuVUgqiVSFScsL+TYJ09j7fK7M2Tpbj0BBG3gGd+sKSD8QS8QdRI6dD6dm1P4zlDGBSOPENrj5H1w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:484:: with SMTP id v4mr6933398lfq.66.1565201580792; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 11:13:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> In-Reply-To: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:12:50 +0300 Message-ID: To: Alexey Melnikov Cc: "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000399e05058f8ae49f" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:13:05 -0000 --000000000000399e05058f8ae49f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Alexey, I would be happy to do this. I=E2=80=99d prefer to deal with the balanced ones. I=E2=80=99ll do the verification of security proofs of the 4 balanced nomin= ated PAKEs by September, 15th, and I=E2=80=99ll be ready to do the following ove= rall reviews for them afterwards. Kind regards, Stanislav =D1=81=D1=80, 7 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 20:58, Alexey Melni= kov : > Dear Crypto Review Panel members! > > According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection > process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the > following: > 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of > the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019. > 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including > independent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, Crypto > Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto Review Panel > members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the > materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done by > October 30th 2019. > > We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all = 4 > augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that). > > Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your > willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 > balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them). > > Best Regards, > Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > --000000000000399e05058f8ae49f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Alexey, I would be happy to do this.=C2=A0

I=E2=80=99d prefer to = deal with the balanced ones.

I=E2=80=99ll do the verification of security proofs of the 4 balanced = nominated PAKEs by September, 15th, and I=E2=80=99ll be ready to do the fol= lowing overall reviews for them afterwards.=C2=A0
Kind regards,
Stanislav

=D1=81=D1=80, 7 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 20:58, Alexey Mel= nikov <alexey.melnikov@isod= e.com>:
=20 =20 =20
Dear Crypto Review Panel members!

According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the following:
1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019.
2)=C2=A0C= rypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including independent reviews).=C2=A0If additional explanations are needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers.=C2=A0Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done by October 30th 2019.

We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that).

Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them).

Best Regards,
Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
--000000000000399e05058f8ae49f-- From nobody Wed Aug 7 12:46:33 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693471201C9 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.396 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTbg3myZ-B7U for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D501205DC for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04544300B08 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:27:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DV9WP6VFAI6Q for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDFCF3004A7; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:27:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Russ Housley Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_873AC5D6-408B-41CF-8006-9B5015335B82" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:46:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" To: Alexey Melnikov References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:46:27 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_873AC5D6-408B-41CF-8006-9B5015335B82 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Alexey: I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other = gathered material for the submissions, as needed. Russ > On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov = wrote: >=20 > Dear Crypto Review Panel members! >=20 > According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection = process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the = following: > 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs = of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th = 2019. > 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials = (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, = Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto = Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, = based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to = be done by October 30th 2019. >=20 > We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or = all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do = that). >=20 > Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your = willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 = balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of = them). >=20 > Best Regards, > Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel --Apple-Mail=_873AC5D6-408B-41CF-8006-9B5015335B82 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Alexey:

I am not the right person to review proofs.  I will review the other gathered material for the submissions, as needed.

Russ


On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

Dear Crypto Review Panel members!

According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the following:
1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019.
2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done by October 30th 2019.

We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that).

Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them).

Best Regards,
Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel

--Apple-Mail=_873AC5D6-408B-41CF-8006-9B5015335B82-- From nobody Wed Aug 7 13:07:34 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2D2120343 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82ajMyGO4hVu for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B765E120152 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id h10so15195202ljg.0 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fDRTLxyOSEVn44hTCqmEdX4KINOAqY4NzpmISbL70vc=; b=DNbEQfwcUqeUYKntV+zSjQgdaGaABHHbMra9lj5OO275bzqoyaxUK6+zFguGUqDLQv 328C71xthHAd1obyg3Ce/udLD751sCyEfzlXGYIQ4YLxnbdJm7Z3qG0QIfJRDzDBkhTJ aE2NNpcQnQ/+Fcm3VG5xsBeFFNBNgXlxFdn3g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fDRTLxyOSEVn44hTCqmEdX4KINOAqY4NzpmISbL70vc=; b=Y6gl/UxGcOsaxx4K5LjNH/TKuaIrwvT5Nooa1RjHHu2AK2QsN4EI9IwT6Y1d61TF9y VaEoW1xemanLc8rkEPQE48oTw83iSaGfnoySoFO3ascAEbFpSZXrDgbXP78giozLk+bH MmRqcMLMGqe18h0T9MmsTHamxfEVvCziW6Peyie5NZlQwJExwblVak7ZSz5l42SKYgqM lyMDOxnvOdZi0fuFkfMvEenqr6qbQEz5dh1OfxFlNJ85eUaCINx6k9LFJrxNkUtMmcho UORVUDLsx8HOy4fBA1spKx1ovkRIDOimmc7vutVyQJh33cXk4SvGHLfDCBEF5A7StT7p mzWA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYmy7CRM1jOX7Vx6OzIrv1XwBfZ9clPt8Zmyb/LqLd/cZOu3Yk v1GkyRGG99gb4uXbFS56piI1opy9D7K5dsh/v7khcQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzyXN+7muYbQ62RbtXYNnHna0a8kjo5J32xNUSVSxc0fpyCD65wgKwknHISuKgvURG2VXbd+/cs/0GzY7C3c+4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8650:: with SMTP id i16mr5921427ljj.178.1565208448903; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:07:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> In-Reply-To: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> From: Bjoern Tackmann Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 22:07:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: Alexey Melnikov Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:07:33 -0000 Dear Alex, I shall be able to deal with the proofs of 4 schemes; I'll be fine with either one of the two batches. I'll do the reviews until September 15. I'll also be happy to contribute to the second phase, although my availability may vary a bit more during that time. Cheers, Bj=C3=B6rn On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 7:58 PM Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > Dear Crypto Review Panel members! > > According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection pro= cess is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the follo= wing: > 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of = the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019. > 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including i= ndependent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, Crypto Review P= anel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto Review Panel members w= rite overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on the materials that h= ave been gathered and verified. This is to be done by October 30th 2019. > > We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all = 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that). > > Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your willingn= ess to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 balanced PAKEs = or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them). > > Best Regards, > Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel From nobody Mon Aug 12 00:28:57 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560AD121345 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:28:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.498 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VrwRtugqDaFe for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7AD3120A19 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 10:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 10so10153139wmp.3 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 10:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tyCVT9t9Ug76xkBkwbMlHKSQRmTC3uqUhsUBLYP8Cbw=; b=QgWJK7DGznDE4AN0PvMWC/Cas9m6d256T7ajwuNopcqKF+L6nfhftS67E9Avk1kASi yiWgx7UOzZLderfDzeRY23WIXk73edKyU/vkQsiAZX6fKZgQWh+a/Bq0grIbFGLRt2ab ciWAXsXSqa6NDfZY4jESK4WJKK9Z6pZ5AaBhR8zZwZbc97d5QfL4khE+bqpYqflMovHp 2Zeef0jWpP8Sxc7sR6QbrSXJMsSgR8pzn4/DUBisU0N9+mmOP2r91yxUV0hMksc3rJM6 dtbfBuzCds7JNUTdlN0C6td+U/BRuFpTCGKEnLkpKS8GJNLBpAHU9gWamipHbr8dxR6u TZQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tyCVT9t9Ug76xkBkwbMlHKSQRmTC3uqUhsUBLYP8Cbw=; b=OFcgaWUYKvbOjjjAe/r/8t9U+Jj1K8VXycPrfYRnVEB91l+AepJbrXjktCfOp1QIVI dKgDFcMvWdejeOxufOoXLqf9WUqY8PIv8TCckpzjjD60ZqsYBTWjHX2eHVznZMqniDIb 9wCqE5kInPmuam5qHrhVf5eHmfEjwFr33766Mm8tdXLiy9AQPuQKNrp3uhCXR3ltr8j1 Bae7L0MeZZRZdA/Hv3Bmonyud/q0bSnvlynxtwVYrIdrQLkezFffiHZ9uMGkbz+xVida TNFrcLS+VWrLNdKR6DzoYe0mnCEYiYVw4cIkZ53+XNi7ENQNzO7Ba22Yr8vnsbzCTs36 ficA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgkLWqsr5lZ85YwlxC6apBfpCgrYeaVU1kJPPL/5TiAl96bqyQ X+Nup0obpVl9MrlF7pMB4GY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+XsU5cELqskZz5kNhQy73awq7wcZc3Iw0Wrn35rgdx/NaEqm/o+iJmPZPOlAzZdbWa4FD5A== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb89:: with SMTP id m9mr20130708wmi.50.1565544522091; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 10:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.156] (bzq-109-66-100-175.red.bezeqint.net. [109.66.100.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b186sm16122871wmb.3.2019.08.11.10.28.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Aug 2019 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT) To: Russ Housley , Alexey Melnikov Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> From: Yaron Sheffer Message-ID: <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 20:28:39 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:28:56 -0000 Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. Thanks, Yaron On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: > Alexey: > > I am not the right person to review proofs.  I will review the other > gathered material for the submissions, as needed. > > Russ > > >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov > > wrote: >> >> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! >> >> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection >> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. >> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the >> following: >> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs >> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019. >> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials >> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. >> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate >> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. >> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. >> >> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. >> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or >> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to >> do that). >> >> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 >> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them). >> >> Best Regards, >> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > From nobody Mon Aug 12 22:44:54 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5225B12008B for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.498 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UpRFkuVwlp3 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060BF12008A for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id s19so13210376lfb.9 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oGVCbShoMK1iMpNUsR2KDoMoYIhhcayx8Af5Sv8HNyM=; b=FsaW5Y5JTSLwhF0/OUSReBtOJKL/mVvZX11jTzCH9fzPhdmqUAV8oMMhRV3jLghGPY AnSJP9hlim3vCnFd91ptIB7DYbDKES2YH+YG95g/GKxHzIBO6yF+73u2BMmHp9HJTRzA vkZF8NJ8jjDP73hOma3jmeUvhWMTZfyhenAMr4kVpK649mjTuJGtanIXUgtnFWGH/8Ca s+/QVFIbeXiM6P7wihid99gEPMw20b1WYmoVHqz3kwqklji76+StEDPdxcpF9zPXcIeG ZUuu9b/3Orl2mLAW0p3zxqAnpYJfcVVhc/+ButvDi5EAC5lsF7RS4/sYTUuEvDn4426g vg8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oGVCbShoMK1iMpNUsR2KDoMoYIhhcayx8Af5Sv8HNyM=; b=NgSMC0bQ2/6qQpJVVUhJBYSrUsE96TDECwMkRXGQOJLSJZG3MT1cNDozcAk+HuCe4+ yz5Vht/E91+GnpdJSYgRjJg+nfCNunoNnsyLKDy5HOSGezTHJ/TRxthbNdq/z78OWNWm GMfXemzOZPto4QYjmurm+lcW4kisI95VZSnKCwkn3taJKztLBDH5BLqmY623w6UoDPp3 qeNZUhE4Gyicn4Wd0nvWuM6BCmjgxR4uYervw6yq0GrZkUFB/6rLTjUfndMhpIVQhNpn Q7fLB4CCi6Z5nwVLYZEAEfTHImYgAyUn50WvDrsnbuk4ZtSgLIMx0UQZbitEHtboJumc 42TA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUzvQD0Dkk9GaBtYPrFRpskiN1KPe9MNua+cjsPn2jIu9x2S1S ERSWbKy7s9dkdqAvbI6X9N5qUm9ocUqlkyNFHCM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzs+yKHXwajp4a7vsT0EBTH1hESpui6FAbKXyayMbUtDPr0ihlScIVX7myh+2vHyjthCnhCBA/IUBmXnkZNAs= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c1d:: with SMTP id r29mr19880013lfp.72.1565675089197; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:45:15 +0300 Message-ID: To: Scott Fluhrer , Pierre-Alain Fouque , Tibor Jager , Tibor Jager Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" , Alexey Melnikov Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000867e4a058ff92386" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 05:44:53 -0000 --000000000000867e4a058ff92386 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will verify the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will review 4 PAKEs. I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs. *Scott*, *Pierre-Alain*, *Tibor*, will you be able to do this? If yes, which of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer? Best regards, Stanislav, CFRG Secretary =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron Sheff= er : > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: > > Alexey: > > > > I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other > > gathered material for the submissions, as needed. > > > > Russ > > > > > >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov >> > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! > >> > >> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection > >> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > >> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the > >> following: > >> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs > >> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th > 2019. > >> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials > >> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are > >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. > >> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate > >> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. > >> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. > >> > >> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > >> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or > >> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to > >> do that). > >> > >> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your > >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 > >> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of > them). > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Crypto-panel mailing list > >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Crypto-panel mailing list > > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > --000000000000867e4a058ff92386 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel memb= ers who will verify the security proofs -=C2=A0Bjoern Tackmann and myself, = each of us will review 4 PAKEs.

I sincerely ho= pe that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager will join us her= e and help with reviewing the security proofs.
Scott, P= ierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which o= f two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer?

Best regards,
Stanislav,
CFRG Secr= etary


=D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 = =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>:
Same as Russ, I am not a cryptograph= er and will not be able to review
proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.

Thanks,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Yaron

On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
> Alexey:
>
> I am not the right person to review proofs.=C2=A0 I will review the ot= her
> gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
>
> Russ
>
>
>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com =
>> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
>>
>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE select= ion
>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do th= e
>> following:
>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security pro= ofs
>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15t= h 2019.
>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials
>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designer= s.
>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidat= e
>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified= .
>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
>>
>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced = or
>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy = to
>> do that).
>>
>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your <= br> >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with = 4
>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of= them).
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>> Crypto-= panel@irtf.org <mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cry= pto-panel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-pane= l@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel
>

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel=
--000000000000867e4a058ff92386-- From nobody Tue Aug 13 01:20:29 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2957A1200B3 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 01:20:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uk7WFuDH__Om for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18241120088 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDB5A1543; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:20:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Fo0Szp5dViYO; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:20:17 +0200 (CEST) References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> From: Tibor Jager To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Cc: Scott Fluhrer , Pierre-Alain Fouque , "crypto-panel\@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs\@ietf.org" , Alexey Melnikov Message-ID: In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:20:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:20:28 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stanislav, These reviews and the corresponding deadlines come at an unfortunate time f= or me, as I already told Alexey last week. I am currently in the process of moving to a different university, my start= ing date there is September 1st. I am currently spending 110% of my time to= make sure that all research funds and staff are transferred in due order, = such that all students will remain funded, which is much less trivial than = what I would have expected. I also have to organize lectures at my old and = new university, make sure that students are taken care of, etc., and will s= oon have to start preparing new lectures. Of course I will try to help as much as possible with the reviews, but it i= s currently very difficult for me to make any promises and binding commitme= nts, given the rather tight reviewing deadlines. Yours sincerely, Tibor Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev writes: > Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will verify= the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will review 4= PAKEs. > > I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager = will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs. > Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which of= two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer? > > Best regards, > Stanislav, > CFRG Secretary > > > =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron She= ffer >: > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: >> Alexey: >> >> I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other >> gathered material for the submissions, as needed. >> >> Russ >> >> >>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov >>> >> w= rote: >>> >>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! >>> >>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection >>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. >>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the >>> following: >>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs >>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 201= 9. >>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials >>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are >>> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. >>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate >>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. >>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. >>> >>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. >>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or >>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to >>> do that). >>> >>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your >>> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 >>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them= ). >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Crypto-panel mailing list >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyRg3TFk4qfnEtSUUStX143RDyIQFAl1ScsAACgkQStX143RD yIQ78hAAvEJNTrEXHAUGO7g7C3wcKr758XZlX9YJeipFUvcFckZwO3i+ZG8x+CXc STqCBBnDWCETWEZBaWwNazgFQfRgWAvCNU5Aq8NCfe68YpZ3YaPLLT97TlyAyh+g Up38h0ymI5kt0lBDqEoJp9PNCCWqwopfjNapWYWVbXZ0q5gVpwHh3iOMrO4Sd8yK d1jadh6DZ1l+nKTiDj2XCJrujYh4J28sfGofxqogrmz2zHNOkcDvcSwGKbpYsuu2 HUMqGwsSScZjaU/r4eWvtbSFoNyDwGG4rH9g8u20rdXgyQ2v+EySDiDIOHzVSx2q LLrpc+VOTcBS3BRp6wBnkCGWAn0CYzl+bKWdp+EiCjI4JLJWmcOEerAQ+DcvyZ+9 YBIHJ2QBugj/P4+UvzD0u/Qd1Z4wKBSvGuRCruOSesONkw5iK+nU9m+brMKcBu52 mgnxwvX6e8PXT6lln8hpbUqgB3EFywafldAcrd4pg1TS4ZyLYxhLO7KYCcaNkli5 YT7GwgKQucIC7vBLKmrjXxCaY2ATIc+ZOlnhNjsvD8m1+oHofm4Nbpu40DtWM+VT GHS9fU1LThSkqKQ7oGzcpsvpx4LfB4ASdQQmeSxLeB/+WbrK3rMvlAGXoUazD2ja vwRRcSjmB/E7triAJi44YC+Fi0VJRj/2QHNhAdF9DWHFkaXziSk= =TR2f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From nobody Tue Aug 13 04:50:36 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A21F120128 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 04:50:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=QsfQzWeU; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=JII5QysR Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjSSURrS3AsD for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 04:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4BE120127 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 04:50:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16056; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565697031; x=1566906631; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=67U/Dc3bEGuGAerdX0e6kyopXDvg6uKmJ63E6a4QY5g=; b=QsfQzWeU+yQQIPz/6Klza7PRT+uIp6wg1ghJOcgTqH2S8atQcFHbb6w3 ui4w2CE6Gz6tzFpfdyhlyRUshSCNcVY0YVRsNtmz78Z43cPc6r7hbpI0N HRYU9Ra0+woquWDlV+V8CjDy2hgAg6lJkNbFk+7kwczr/T7MJMlusOsZ/ 4=; IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A8+HLjBAjN3+oik6ivgGIUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs03kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHw?= =?us-ascii?q?QAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuN/DuciwgEd5qX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AdAACNo1Jd/5JdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVgEBAQEBAQsBgRUvUANtVSAECyoKhBSDRwOLEYJbiVy?= =?us-ascii?q?JLIRagUKBEANUCQEBAQwBARgBCgoCAQGDekUCF4JhIzcGDgEEAQEEAQEEAQp?= =?us-ascii?q?thScMhUoBAQEBAwEBEBEKEwEBIwkFBgEPAgEGAhEEAQEBJwMCAgIfBgsUCQg?= =?us-ascii?q?CBAENBQgagwGBHU0DHQEOkGiQYQKBOIhgc4EygnoBAQWFAw0LghQDBoE0AYo?= =?us-ascii?q?hgUMXgUA/gRFGgh4uPoIaRwGBKjoVFgmCVTKCJo8ShQ6WbkAJAoIdkDmEFII?= =?us-ascii?q?why+OXo1ViVeOLAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBZiKBWHAVO4JsgkKDcoUUhT9ygSmNLAG?= =?us-ascii?q?BIAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,381,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="306059291" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Aug 2019 11:50:28 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7DBoSgL030170 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:50:28 GMT Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:50:28 -0500 Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:50:27 -0500 Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:50:27 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PNwauU8HAueeOLPU/isoUKW9Ee9L8AacsB0A0+jxJI21A9jlrpPMHMo9Wq5NstptfmLzHh/6iLYR3oprgrlY6wQPqO9gluM6kC/Nho1GYHql3+Bsho/5NHDocK/5nyfX2fFk8zGQGq7SapcUWWvXEIRKD6Cnc0PQx3qbqd0Mi88P5tLIrscf/1+RY4WnBl98wT/rcIYCtIIykm6G5J6yBYRqXgYE45/59AzyfKZFuF6f6KTXuhgoBeI7Myua0khzC1H+kDOkNMcBVPUCnASGEcacWFyIYFK7pzoa21tG69d6iovN0SNnzntBRxlhJN3a2ECmx43VtkCCh1WHrhVTGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=67U/Dc3bEGuGAerdX0e6kyopXDvg6uKmJ63E6a4QY5g=; b=NdaLSNoY0kZ9s0r3SYb9Q0fH2JiZL+l9RrijRkIbtY32Zt0iOL8yqMwJ4nyQi+9DKgblItpe6qgN34ZlPHV/F6d1vZ3di38E2GzjV9QBgp6eV0ErzyTIIBgrBG9QHUJI+lqrnN8N5PEEGI0/bkIG6Peama6UBRUGTmKkHj49ZThz1xKCDhU2e3sBRkHtcX+E0L8+c7BvO7lFqYJ7d6VOaGzGT8iNJXa+QkXta/qnh0Emwl1liYWUV5EO61loRNClbcQNSJ6oiRC7X8h15OENYzO6ImOIiPUYRIMQF3UbXts7mX+e4Q6rTQBFAcZpWZ1/sn/Ec+hPRK6i+XagXy+fOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=67U/Dc3bEGuGAerdX0e6kyopXDvg6uKmJ63E6a4QY5g=; b=JII5QysROpyQ+zvhvFpg95o1agd9N/Mxtsyu7oRxx5UixdRlw5NlWkU1AIDJ2qLRuC6viTiUtTZNEIzkhromUDTtaJLwXOCUvzRhKtf0VNAQlCSJ7oEgdi5MhzxwLKj9fNxkAilps4aRAuI8Hg4O/Nc7jXdOvZNKTlEAOY0xDoM= Received: from MN2PR11MB3871.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.204) by MN2PR11MB4495.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.37.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2157.20; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:50:26 +0000 Received: from MN2PR11MB3871.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4c5:965:c7b7:387b]) by MN2PR11MB3871.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4c5:965:c7b7:387b%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:50:26 +0000 From: "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" , Pierre-Alain Fouque , Tibor Jager , Tibor Jager CC: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" , Alexey Melnikov Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms Thread-Index: AQHVTUnDGOvprULWwk+vifgf+IOww6bwFv2AgAYi3ICAAmAjgIAAZdmA Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:50:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sfluhrer@cisco.com; x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.74] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ea677ac-2d3b-422c-5936-08d71fe46eb2 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4495; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4495: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(446003)(8936002)(478600001)(54906003)(476003)(316002)(486006)(99286004)(966005)(2906002)(74316002)(6116002)(110136005)(86362001)(11346002)(3846002)(790700001)(33656002)(606006)(66066001)(66476007)(6436002)(66446008)(7736002)(81156014)(64756008)(55016002)(54896002)(66556008)(76176011)(8676002)(81166006)(71200400001)(14454004)(26005)(66946007)(229853002)(71190400001)(25786009)(7696005)(6506007)(53546011)(6246003)(102836004)(5660300002)(236005)(9686003)(76116006)(186003)(256004)(52536014)(53936002)(6306002)(4326008)(14444005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4495; H:MN2PR11MB3871.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: QC4qAv9fRVx6n1B0TD26KqHcicgq1q2yRresxOyGKTTAyP6oUJdMu/azv57h6VI2NnwybyeuhYNeeisWB4YU938J0EJz8GWjpQ0aDg7rKO8EiqhGjErroipsKYSnVs/G+cZXdVVKnuQAXIXuU0cb4q3EyYBksYKG/5FmEn/X9p255otvE2hfWeeeBrejzUNS1Fch/mENCh1xE42axoH3I44K1KhkuDU5GFnW9S2evMGh2lWzOAS9HGVVtJHN+Fm4hT71Aow3+q2PlMrGyUHGGnYR0+XfFCZy+1PZm4qhdtGcxe9s1mpZ1VWxE0Esqfuh9diIwWbc4cIKX4T6PHYp6jLD8cVxe156KiZYO516BMjad9fGP0rdSNdKrYMzZQypupJ0ztaAE6CWr6hgKLGeguZvKrXbg9Cgf2+xswZQsV0= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB38712BAB552CBFCBDA86DB72C1D20MN2PR11MB3871namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ea677ac-2d3b-422c-5936-08d71fe46eb2 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Aug 2019 11:50:26.4112 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wO1J3/aRstDlQfG86+qIyQTm9FfN30DqXSpLFqwJnoHnfLqtEVJbFQoLv4gZ7O4/v4owY/kaHpqJ0weUfcyLJQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4495 X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 11:50:35 -0000 --_000_MN2PR11MB38712BAB552CBFCBDA86DB72C1D20MN2PR11MB3871namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SeKAmWxsIHNlZSB3aGF0IEkgY2FuIGRvLg0KDQpJIGRvbuKAmXQgcGVyc29uYWxseSBoYXZlIGFu eSBwcmVmZXJlbmNlIOKAkyBhc3NpZ25lZCB3aGljaGV2ZXIgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gbWXigKYNCg0K RnJvbTogU3RhbmlzbGF2IFYuIFNteXNobHlhZXYgPHNteXNoc3ZAZ21haWwuY29tPg0KU2VudDog VHVlc2RheSwgQXVndXN0IDEzLCAyMDE5IDE6NDUgQU0NClRvOiBTY290dCBGbHVocmVyIChzZmx1 aHJlcikgPHNmbHVocmVyQGNpc2NvLmNvbT47IFBpZXJyZS1BbGFpbiBGb3VxdWUgPHBhLmZvdXF1 ZUBnbWFpbC5jb20+OyBUaWJvciBKYWdlciA8dGlib3IuamFnZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPjsgVGlib3Ig SmFnZXIgPHRpYm9yLmphZ2VyQHVwYi5kZT4NCkNjOiBjcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc7IGNm cmctY2hhaXJzQGlldGYub3JnOyBBbGV4ZXkgTWVsbmlrb3YgPGFsZXhleS5tZWxuaWtvdkBpc29k ZS5jb20+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW0NyeXB0by1wYW5lbF0gU29saWNpdGluZyByZXZpZXdzIG9m IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBQQUtFIGFsZ29yaXRobXMNCg0KQ3VycmVudGx5LCB3ZSd2ZSBnb3Qgb25seSB0 d28gY3J5cHRvIHJldmlldyBwYW5lbCBtZW1iZXJzIHdobyB3aWxsIHZlcmlmeSB0aGUgc2VjdXJp dHkgcHJvb2ZzIC0gQmpvZXJuIFRhY2ttYW5uIGFuZCBteXNlbGYsIGVhY2ggb2YgdXMgd2lsbCBy ZXZpZXcgNCBQQUtFcy4NCg0KSSBzaW5jZXJlbHkgaG9wZSB0aGF0IFNjb3R0IEZsdWhyZXIsIFBp ZXJyZS1BbGFpbiBGb3VxdWUgYW5kIFRpYm9yIEphZ2VyIHdpbGwgam9pbiB1cyBoZXJlIGFuZCBo ZWxwIHdpdGggcmV2aWV3aW5nIHRoZSBzZWN1cml0eSBwcm9vZnMuDQpTY290dCwgUGllcnJlLUFs YWluLCBUaWJvciwgd2lsbCB5b3UgYmUgYWJsZSB0byBkbyB0aGlzPyBJZiB5ZXMsIHdoaWNoIG9m IHR3byBiYXRjaGVzICg0IGJhbGFuY2VkIFBBS0VzIG9yIDQgYXVnbWVudGVkIFBBS0VzKSB3aWxs IHlvdSBwcmVmZXI/DQoNCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNClN0YW5pc2xhdiwNCkNGUkcgU2VjcmV0YXJ5 DQoNCg0K0L/QvSwgMTIg0LDQstCzLiAyMDE5INCzLiDQsiAxMDoyOSwgWWFyb24gU2hlZmZlciA8 eWFyb25mLmlldGZAZ21haWwuY29tPG1haWx0bzp5YXJvbmYuaWV0ZkBnbWFpbC5jb20+PjoNClNh bWUgYXMgUnVzcywgSSBhbSBub3QgYSBjcnlwdG9ncmFwaGVyIGFuZCB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhYmxl IHRvIHJldmlldw0KcHJvb2ZzLiBJIHdpbGwgYmUgaGFwcHkgdG8gcmV2aWV3IHRoZSBvdGhlciBt YXRlcmlhbC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KICAgICAgICBZYXJvbg0KDQpPbiAwNy8wOC8yMDE5IDIyOjQ2 LCBSdXNzIEhvdXNsZXkgd3JvdGU6DQo+IEFsZXhleToNCj4NCj4gSSBhbSBub3QgdGhlIHJpZ2h0 IHBlcnNvbiB0byByZXZpZXcgcHJvb2ZzLiAgSSB3aWxsIHJldmlldyB0aGUgb3RoZXINCj4gZ2F0 aGVyZWQgbWF0ZXJpYWwgZm9yIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9ucywgYXMgbmVlZGVkLg0KPg0KPiBSdXNz DQo+DQo+DQo+PiBPbiBBdWcgNywgMjAxOSwgYXQgMTo1OCBQTSwgQWxleGV5IE1lbG5pa292IDxh bGV4ZXkubWVsbmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29tPG1haWx0bzphbGV4ZXkubWVsbmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29t Pg0KPj4gPG1haWx0bzphbGV4ZXkubWVsbmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29tPG1haWx0bzphbGV4ZXkubWVs bmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29tPj4+IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4NCj4+IERlYXIgQ3J5cHRvIFJldmlldyBQYW5l bCBtZW1iZXJzIQ0KPj4NCj4+IEFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0aGUgcGxhbiwgdGhlIG1vc3QgaW1wb3J0 YW50IHBhcnRzIG9mIHRoZSBQQUtFIHNlbGVjdGlvbg0KPj4gcHJvY2VzcyBpcyBkb25lIGJ5IHRo ZSBDcnlwdG8gUmV2aWV3IFBhbmVsIG1lbWJlcnMuDQo+PiBNb3JlIHByZWNpc2VseSwgdGhlIENy eXB0byBSZXZpZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyB3aWxsIG5lZWQgdG8gZG8gdGhlDQo+PiBmb2xsb3dp bmc6DQo+PiAxKSBDcnlwdG8gUmV2aWV3IFBhbmVsIG1lbWJlcnMgZG8gdGhlIHZlcmlmaWNhdGlv biBvZiBzZWN1cml0eSBwcm9vZnMNCj4+IG9mIHRoZSBjYW5kaWRhdGVzIGFuZCBvdmVyYWxsIHNl Y3VyaXR5IGFzc2Vzc21lbnQgYnkgU2VwdGVtYmVyIDE1dGggMjAxOS4NCj4+IDIpIENyeXB0byBS ZXZpZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyByZXZpZXcgYWxsIGdhdGhlcmVkIG1hdGVyaWFscw0KPj4gKGlu Y2x1ZGluZyBpbmRlcGVuZGVudCByZXZpZXdzKS4gSWYgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBleHBsYW5hdGlvbnMg YXJlDQo+PiBuZWVkZWQsIENyeXB0byBSZXZpZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyBhc2sgZm9yIHRoZW0g ZnJvbSB0aGUgZGVzaWduZXJzLg0KPj4gQ3J5cHRvIFJldmlldyBQYW5lbCBtZW1iZXJzIHdyaXRl IG92ZXJhbGwgcmV2aWV3cyBmb3IgYWxsIGNhbmRpZGF0ZQ0KPj4gUEFLRXMsIGJhc2VkIG9uIHRo ZSBtYXRlcmlhbHMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gZ2F0aGVyZWQgYW5kIHZlcmlmaWVkLg0KPj4gVGhp cyBpcyB0byBiZSBkb25lIGJ5IE9jdG9iZXIgMzB0aCAyMDE5Lg0KPj4NCj4+IFdlIGhhdmUgOCBu b21pbmF0ZWQgUEFLRXM6IDQgYmFsYW5jZWQgYW5kIDQgYXVnbWVudGVkLg0KPj4gRWFjaCBtZW1i ZXIgaXMgYXNrZWQgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSByZXZpZXdzIGZvciBlaXRoZXIgYWxsIDQgYmFsYW5jZWQg b3INCj4+IGFsbCA0IGF1Z21lbnRlZCBQQUtFcyAob3IgZm9yIGFsbCA4IFBBS0VzLCBpZiB0aGUg bWVtYmVyIGlzIGhhcHB5IHRvDQo+PiBkbyB0aGF0KS4NCj4+DQo+PiBQbGVhc2UgcmVwbHkgdG8g dGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCB0ZWxsIHRoZSBDRlJHIGNoYWlycyBhYm91dCB5b3VyDQo+PiB3aWxs aW5nbmVzcyB0byBkbyB0aGlzIGFuZCwgaWYgeWVzLCB3b3VsZCB5b3UgcHJlZmVyIHRvIGRlYWwg d2l0aCA0DQo+PiBiYWxhbmNlZCBQQUtFcyBvciB3aXRoIDQgYXVnbWVudGVkIFBBS0VzIChvciwg bWF5YmUsIHdpdGggYWxsIDggb2YgdGhlbSkuDQo+Pg0KPj4gQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KPj4gQWxl eGV5IChvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgQ0ZSRyBjaGFpcnMpDQo+PiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPj4gQ3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0K Pj4gQ3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsQGlydGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc+IDxt YWlsdG86Q3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsQGlydGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc+ Pg0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaXJ0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9jcnlwdG8tcGFuZWwN Cj4NCj4NCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18N Cj4gQ3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPiBDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc8bWFp bHRvOkNyeXB0by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZz4NCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaXJ0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9jcnlwdG8tcGFuZWwNCj4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkNyeXB0by1wYW5lbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkNyeXB0by1w YW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86Q3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsQGlydGYub3JnPg0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cu aXJ0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9jcnlwdG8tcGFuZWwNCg== --_000_MN2PR11MB38712BAB552CBFCBDA86DB72C1D20MN2PR11MB3871namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1m YWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAy IDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWws IGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsc2Fucy1zZXJpZjt9DQph OmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xv cjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1z b0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpwdXJw bGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwLm1zb25vcm1hbDAsIGxpLm1zb25v cm1hbDAsIGRpdi5tc29ub3JtYWwwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOm1zb25vcm1hbDsNCgltc28t bWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGluOw0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjBpbjsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0Ow0KCWZv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIixzYW5zLXNlcmlmO30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTE4DQoJe21z by1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIixzYW5z LXNlcmlmOw0KCWNvbG9yOndpbmRvd3RleHQ7fQ0KLk1zb0NocERlZmF1bHQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxl LXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7fQ0K QHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6OC41aW4gMTEuMGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbjoxLjBpbiAx LjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbjt9DQpkaXYuV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rpb24x O30NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWRlZmF1bHRz IHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBzcGlkbWF4PSIxMDI2IiAvPg0KPC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+PCEtLVtp ZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWxheW91dCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCI+DQo8bzppZG1h cCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgZGF0YT0iMSIgLz4NCjwvbzpzaGFwZWxheW91dD48L3htbD48IVtlbmRp Zl0tLT4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBsaW5rPSJibHVlIiB2bGluaz0icHVy cGxlIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMSI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5J 4oCZbGwgc2VlIHdoYXQgSSBjYW4gZG8uPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkkgZG9u4oCZ dCBwZXJzb25hbGx5IGhhdmUgYW55IHByZWZlcmVuY2Ug4oCTIGFzc2lnbmVkIHdoaWNoZXZlciB5 b3Ugd2FudCB0byBtZeKApjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9IkVOLUdCIj48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9 ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0OnNvbGlkIGJsdWUgMS41cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4gMGlu IDBpbiA0LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLXRvcDpz b2xpZCAjRTFFMUUxIDEuMHB0O3BhZGRpbmc6My4wcHQgMGluIDBpbiAwaW4iPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+RnJvbTo8L2I+IFN0YW5pc2xhdiBWLiBTbXlzaGx5YWV2ICZsdDtzbXlz aHN2QGdtYWlsLmNvbSZndDsgPGJyPg0KPGI+U2VudDo8L2I+IFR1ZXNkYXksIEF1Z3VzdCAxMywg MjAxOSAxOjQ1IEFNPGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBTY290dCBGbHVocmVyIChzZmx1aHJlcikgJmx0 O3NmbHVocmVyQGNpc2NvLmNvbSZndDs7IFBpZXJyZS1BbGFpbiBGb3VxdWUgJmx0O3BhLmZvdXF1 ZUBnbWFpbC5jb20mZ3Q7OyBUaWJvciBKYWdlciAmbHQ7dGlib3IuamFnZXJAZ21haWwuY29tJmd0 OzsgVGlib3IgSmFnZXIgJmx0O3RpYm9yLmphZ2VyQHVwYi5kZSZndDs8YnI+DQo8Yj5DYzo8L2I+ IGNyeXB0by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZzsgY2ZyZy1jaGFpcnNAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IEFsZXhleSBNZWxu aWtvdiAmbHQ7YWxleGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlzb2RlLmNvbSZndDs8YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJqZWN0Ojwv Yj4gUmU6IFtDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxdIFNvbGljaXRpbmcgcmV2aWV3cyBvZiBzdWJtaXR0ZWQgUEFL RSBhbGdvcml0aG1zPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+Q3VycmVudGx5LCB3ZSd2ZSBnb3Qgb25seSB0d28gY3J5cHRvIHJldmlldyBwYW5lbCBtZW1i ZXJzIHdobyB3aWxsIHZlcmlmeSB0aGUgc2VjdXJpdHkgcHJvb2ZzIC0mbmJzcDtCam9lcm4gVGFj a21hbm4gYW5kIG15c2VsZiwgZWFjaCBvZiB1cyB3aWxsIHJldmlldyA0IFBBS0VzLjxvOnA+PC9v OnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5JIHNp bmNlcmVseSBob3BlIHRoYXQgU2NvdHQgRmx1aHJlciwgUGllcnJlLUFsYWluIEZvdXF1ZSBhbmQg VGlib3IgSmFnZXIgd2lsbCBqb2luIHVzIGhlcmUgYW5kIGhlbHAgd2l0aCByZXZpZXdpbmcgdGhl IHNlY3VyaXR5IHByb29mcy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNz PSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPlNjb3R0PC9iPiwgPGI+UGllcnJlLUFsYWluPC9iPiwgPGI+VGlib3I8 L2I+LCB3aWxsIHlvdSBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGRvIHRoaXM/IElmIHllcywgd2hpY2ggb2YgdHdvIGJh dGNoZXMgKDQgYmFsYW5jZWQgUEFLRXMgb3IgNCBhdWdtZW50ZWQgUEFLRXMpIHdpbGwgeW91IHBy ZWZlcj88bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwi PjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+QmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+U3RhbmlzbGF2LDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+Q0ZSRyBTZWNyZXRhcnk8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+0L/QvSwgMTIg0LDQstCzLiAy MDE5INCzLiDQsiAxMDoyOSwgWWFyb24gU2hlZmZlciAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOnlhcm9u Zi5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPnlhcm9uZi5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbTwv YT4mZ3Q7OjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVy Om5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLWxlZnQ6c29saWQgI0NDQ0NDQyAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjBpbiAwaW4gMGlu IDYuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjQuOHB0O21hcmdpbi1yaWdodDowaW4iPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+U2FtZSBhcyBSdXNzLCBJIGFtIG5vdCBhIGNyeXB0b2dyYXBoZXIgYW5kIHdpbGwg bm90IGJlIGFibGUgdG8gcmV2aWV3DQo8YnI+DQpwcm9vZnMuIEkgd2lsbCBiZSBoYXBweSB0byBy ZXZpZXcgdGhlIG90aGVyIG1hdGVyaWFsLjxicj4NCjxicj4NClRoYW5rcyw8YnI+DQombmJzcDsg Jm5ic3A7ICZuYnNwOyAmbmJzcDsgWWFyb248YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpPbiAwNy8wOC8yMDE5IDIyOjQ2 LCBSdXNzIEhvdXNsZXkgd3JvdGU6PGJyPg0KJmd0OyBBbGV4ZXk6PGJyPg0KJmd0OyA8YnI+DQom Z3Q7IEkgYW0gbm90IHRoZSByaWdodCBwZXJzb24gdG8gcmV2aWV3IHByb29mcy4mbmJzcDsgSSB3 aWxsIHJldmlldyB0aGUgb3RoZXIgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBnYXRoZXJlZCBtYXRlcmlhbCBmb3IgdGhl IHN1Ym1pc3Npb25zLCBhcyBuZWVkZWQuPGJyPg0KJmd0OyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IFJ1c3M8YnI+DQom Z3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsgT24gQXVnIDcsIDIwMTksIGF0IDE6NTggUE0s IEFsZXhleSBNZWxuaWtvdiAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmFsZXhleS5tZWxuaWtvdkBpc29k ZS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5hbGV4ZXkubWVsbmlrb3ZAaXNvZGUuY29tPC9hPg0KPGJy Pg0KJmd0OyZndDsgJmx0O21haWx0bzo8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86YWxleGV5Lm1lbG5pa292QGlz b2RlLmNvbSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmFsZXhleS5tZWxuaWtvdkBpc29kZS5jb208L2E+Jmd0 OyZndDsgd3JvdGU6PGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDs8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBEZWFyIENyeXB0byBSZXZp ZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyE8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IEFjY29yZGluZyB0 byB0aGUgcGxhbiwgdGhlIG1vc3QgaW1wb3J0YW50IHBhcnRzIG9mIHRoZSBQQUtFIHNlbGVjdGlv biA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBwcm9jZXNzIGlzIGRvbmUgYnkgdGhlIENyeXB0byBSZXZpZXcgUGFu ZWwgbWVtYmVycy48YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBNb3JlIHByZWNpc2VseSwgdGhlIENyeXB0byBSZXZp ZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyB3aWxsIG5lZWQgdG8gZG8gdGhlIDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IGZvbGxv d2luZzo8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyAxKSBDcnlwdG8gUmV2aWV3IFBhbmVsIG1lbWJlcnMgZG8gdGhl IHZlcmlmaWNhdGlvbiBvZiBzZWN1cml0eSBwcm9vZnMgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsgb2YgdGhlIGNh bmRpZGF0ZXMgYW5kIG92ZXJhbGwgc2VjdXJpdHkgYXNzZXNzbWVudCBieSBTZXB0ZW1iZXIgMTV0 aCAyMDE5Ljxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IDIpIENyeXB0byBSZXZpZXcgUGFuZWwgbWVtYmVycyByZXZp ZXcgYWxsIGdhdGhlcmVkIG1hdGVyaWFscyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyAoaW5jbHVkaW5nIGluZGVw ZW5kZW50IHJldmlld3MpLiBJZiBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGV4cGxhbmF0aW9ucyBhcmUgPGJyPg0KJmd0 OyZndDsgbmVlZGVkLCBDcnlwdG8gUmV2aWV3IFBhbmVsIG1lbWJlcnMgYXNrIGZvciB0aGVtIGZy b20gdGhlIGRlc2lnbmVycy4gPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsgQ3J5cHRvIFJldmlldyBQYW5lbCBtZW1i ZXJzIHdyaXRlIG92ZXJhbGwgcmV2aWV3cyBmb3IgYWxsIGNhbmRpZGF0ZSA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0 OyBQQUtFcywgYmFzZWQgb24gdGhlIG1hdGVyaWFscyB0aGF0IGhhdmUgYmVlbiBnYXRoZXJlZCBh bmQgdmVyaWZpZWQuIDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IFRoaXMgaXMgdG8gYmUgZG9uZSBieSBPY3RvYmVy IDMwdGggMjAxOS48YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IFdlIGhhdmUgOCBub21pbmF0 ZWQgUEFLRXM6IDQgYmFsYW5jZWQgYW5kIDQgYXVnbWVudGVkLjxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IEVhY2gg bWVtYmVyIGlzIGFza2VkIHRvIHByb3ZpZGUgcmV2aWV3cyBmb3IgZWl0aGVyIGFsbCA0IGJhbGFu Y2VkIG9yIDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IGFsbCA0IGF1Z21lbnRlZCBQQUtFcyAob3IgZm9yIGFsbCA4 IFBBS0VzLCBpZiB0aGUgbWVtYmVyIGlzIGhhcHB5IHRvIDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IGRvIHRoYXQp Ljxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsgUGxlYXNlIHJlcGx5IHRvIHRoaXMgbWVzc2Fn ZSBhbmQgdGVsbCB0aGUgQ0ZSRyBjaGFpcnMgYWJvdXQgeW91ciA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyB3aWxs aW5nbmVzcyB0byBkbyB0aGlzIGFuZCwgaWYgeWVzLCB3b3VsZCB5b3UgcHJlZmVyIHRvIGRlYWwg d2l0aCA0IDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IGJhbGFuY2VkIFBBS0VzIG9yIHdpdGggNCBhdWdtZW50ZWQg UEFLRXMgKG9yLCBtYXliZSwgd2l0aCBhbGwgOCBvZiB0aGVtKS48YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4N CiZndDsmZ3Q7IEJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcyw8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBBbGV4ZXkgKG9uIGJlaGFsZiBv ZiBDRlJHIGNoYWlycyk8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IENyeXB0by1wYW5lbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3Q8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86Q3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsQGlydGYub3JnIiB0 YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+Q3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsQGlydGYub3JnPC9hPiAmbHQ7bWFpbHRvOjxhIGhy ZWY9Im1haWx0bzpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmciIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5DcnlwdG8t cGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc8L2E+Jmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7IDxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LmlydGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+ aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaXJ0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9jcnlwdG8tcGFuZWw8L2E+PGJy Pg0KJmd0OyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+DQomZ3Q7IENyeXB0by1wYW5lbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8 YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmciIHRhcmdldD0i X2JsYW5rIj5DcnlwdG8tcGFuZWxAaXJ0Zi5vcmc8L2E+PGJyPg0KJmd0OyA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRw czovL3d3dy5pcnRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NyeXB0by1wYW5lbCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJf YmxhbmsiPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlydGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY3J5cHRvLXBhbmVs PC9hPjxicj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+DQpDcnlwdG8tcGFuZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0KPGEg aHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOkNyeXB0by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPkNyeXB0 by1wYW5lbEBpcnRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+DQo8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL3d3dy5pcnRmLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2NyeXB0by1wYW5lbCIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 LmlydGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY3J5cHRvLXBhbmVsPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9w Pg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_MN2PR11MB38712BAB552CBFCBDA86DB72C1D20MN2PR11MB3871namp_-- From nobody Tue Aug 13 07:38:43 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3324612022A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.498 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UP8IkvMNPFdW for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87B1120130 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 15so10011603ljr.9 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+Ju3Z4UXvA1ptZRFA2mPjz9GQsM34RtJaSh90ljQEJY=; b=RO79PG8YgDXiRYB8jfqOD6v8qWZqgs8CytA/BL5XhPTErgpvcsA518s3bhWNKJrt5+ ORBg8w5XndTjTw7lOmWlNr4H9JULUxjxtI51Z6gJC9jeHuWWR3KX0/L2QHnxfm6rDu3k xnbU/5s//66+0D49ASV4oOrDJVCBtzNobm40BL+nsiQukJYwjcALDw/42KpKo9WxkPQI xjbb+LWPIEzjZkOSHOzGCX95LWcNe1MBeLqwLTFOm7JmchE3UyfLwzF3ATdcNmxyP7Qh 0t6EOkSuvSeWRkq/KjLSJMT0v7h5zDQ7mLhINkUZbyhlRBnSF1pFuTtJL28X8yLhMxfa qR5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+Ju3Z4UXvA1ptZRFA2mPjz9GQsM34RtJaSh90ljQEJY=; b=XVWS57W6fg8+JJ26ORC3a8dzDgeIJ9Mhq8OVdN71Ad3aGqYvNmd+jdH34j4GkIUStz us8XV+ti1H0oXvCFWKxy93Xf647QA21iZcIUI7xMuv63rR4bkwRzxBoYPOeBEYL3e15f U5iEKZmnQPZuEJiweeftcLAYJ0hhRTOov6DZAu+LRV+uGf1EXyfRGqPBerlBN1xCKBgM U15xeZbN5eFsRX2yaTBkbN8pPO+dwi1k2ztPHfPJBPxhQ3KAKVO6v7+pK9eH1Pyb8zB4 kB/9/miy9GfUUVOxkvvQEkmhF+PAhSLMYu9ruKZEYmx/fIURM+CxEJaEeCAn4mS95N0W dd9g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQYBUcRClBB0VbnzGGRidHdvfYqHH1+SKckBgQxVLucSYYElvp DlD3XASUH835vobMS9KEiWR0x/GMCFAa8QoYiMw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPnqaTpsX54k3u8+/sL624r0ptJbBKgXZCRh9cEOT+R9C9ocrsinPUiK9zhDGdz/HlbsFdxu++hW43ioNz27E= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:970a:: with SMTP id r10mr20788360lji.115.1565707117124; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:38:26 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" Cc: Alexey Melnikov , Pierre-Alain Fouque , Tibor Jager , Tibor Jager , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089e46805900098d5" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:38:41 -0000 --00000000000089e46805900098d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great, many thanks! =D0=B2=D1=82, 13 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 14:50, Scott Fluhr= er (sfluhrer) : > I=E2=80=99ll see what I can do. > > > > I don=E2=80=99t personally have any preference =E2=80=93 assigned whichev= er you want to me=E2=80=A6 > > > > *From:* Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:45 AM > *To:* Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) ; Pierre-Alain Fouque = < > pa.fouque@gmail.com>; Tibor Jager ; Tibor Jager < > tibor.jager@upb.de> > *Cc:* crypto-panel@irtf.org; cfrg-chairs@ietf.org; Alexey Melnikov < > alexey.melnikov@isode.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE > algorithms > > > > Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will verify > the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will review = 4 > PAKEs. > > > > I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager > will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs. > > *Scott*, *Pierre-Alain*, *Tibor*, will you be able to do this? If yes, > which of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you > prefer? > > > > Best regards, > > Stanislav, > > CFRG Secretary > > > > > > =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron She= ffer : > > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. > > Thanks, > Yaron > > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: > > Alexey: > > > > I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other > > gathered material for the submissions, as needed. > > > > Russ > > > > > >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov >> > wrote: > >> > >> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! > >> > >> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection > >> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > >> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the > >> following: > >> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs > >> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th > 2019. > >> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials > >> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are > >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. > >> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate > >> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. > >> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. > >> > >> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > >> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or > >> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to > >> do that). > >> > >> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your > >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 > >> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of > them). > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Crypto-panel mailing list > >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Crypto-panel mailing list > > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > --00000000000089e46805900098d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Great, many thanks!

=D0=B2=D1=82, 13 =D0= =B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 14:50, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer@cisco.com>:

I=E2=80=99ll see what I can do.

=C2=A0

I don=E2=80=99t personally have any preference =E2= =80=93 assigned whichever you want to me=E2=80=A6

=C2=A0

From: Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:45 AM
To: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer@cisco.com>; Pierre-Alain Fouque <pa.fouque@gmail.com<= /a>>; Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@gmail.com>; Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@upb.de>
Cc: crypt= o-panel@irtf.org; cfrg-chairs@ietf.org; Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE alg= orithms

=C2=A0

Currently, we've got only two crypto review pane= l members who will verify the security proofs -=C2=A0Bjoern Tackmann and my= self, each of us will review 4 PAKEs.

=C2=A0

I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fo= uque and Tibor Jager will join us here and help with reviewing the security= proofs.

Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, wil= l you be able to do this? If yes, which of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or= 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer?

=C2=A0

Best regards,

Stanislav,

CFRG Secretary

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

=D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. = =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>:

Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not = be able to review
proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.

Thanks,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Yaron

On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
> Alexey:
>
> I am not the right person to review proofs.=C2=A0 I will review the ot= her
> gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
>
> Russ
>
>
>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com
>> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
>>
>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE select= ion
>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do th= e
>> following:
>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security pro= ofs
>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15t= h 2019.
>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials
>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designer= s.
>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidat= e
>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified= .
>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
>>
>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced = or
>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy = to
>> do that).
>>
>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your <= br> >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with = 4
>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of= them).
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>> Crypto-= panel@irtf.org <mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-pane= l@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>

_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel mailing list
Crypto-panel@irt= f.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel<= /p>

--00000000000089e46805900098d5-- From nobody Tue Aug 13 22:50:24 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE36120058 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.497 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GraOq0wQH-lF for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308E3120052 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e27so8528022ljb.7 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hBboSvREIZnunZR8tdjKaBlZhtfYwPEsAFSv86IMvGo=; b=vgw+iMk/2zg3sQv93uwhqSnMENuCq38uWlU6LixUExku5mR+fWC/YDJlFYIZXNcVCx kxrlN3fk8mWxw65BUQibo7nqng2BL8+JWMxgINMUMCTLHP4Gtach9vZFhA8Jaw5XWshA 3a9Jlei/H/VMci114MDIbxa6oDdWWpSAJV0QCCDsatQnMC3He62OtOCzcEUmgBqgo+yI 7xDeIdaxCAWRofSdPv4num6cqkaXteYqGgJ8jWvv5hnHPqp1twQXwzI5q4CQumVvcqQy 5nCi1XL7WfU3AtC2+bHYuK7bd7v1Y8ASOXX9o8M7PRo28B9tedZGd6Y443fLlMwbt5I4 u2fQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hBboSvREIZnunZR8tdjKaBlZhtfYwPEsAFSv86IMvGo=; b=TrMh2B+v2XJUFgKLBg9s8spu/nUDUbRRcLUqHAxw5d3cpcQOK+Ar/wS+HPcVdhc9Ys j3cTfCfPSCs/WIcec4ue9b/XiF9N+uuSnJ/O/HdIlZFgtCskwGAYuVxV6NZdChu5+dsU C7bOAUzhhA5jCaTBPlc216sn2lT/rhtV7YYKetPRBNSksebc8b2O6Ij+xzwtjRTwGWe8 TcCJ1PhteRtC2jc5PTW6LFq5AucVU89q+KEHbICo/+IjcJp6PPyizS6JOlcOxkN0X8KF madS2AGc2eMbXltyS+3rmehkzt/YjYpuOPvwPyiVGc6shc37/oW+VRnsph5FjRJUK2Zr dD2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUH21PHYK1FBqSl5jRR4rJQKcnHLukDJY0f6MbAvGz1t1Uti5Yx B9Cjfi4PvBeZk5hd/Q53ttgjOJnrJC/aDqBx5DE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwx2d3BNv0MbD+AgHDd7dGG8S9Hp/D50tBs7I8f/riHNLLrJfWNiVxAkh2XktAPh+uIz6nZFkw5Uyq+uuRbB6o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:805a:: with SMTP id p26mr6491213ljg.235.1565761818235; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:50:44 +0300 Message-ID: To: Tibor Jager Cc: Scott Fluhrer , Pierre-Alain Fouque , "crypto-panel@irtf.org" , "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" , Alexey Melnikov Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa971305900d5477" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 05:50:23 -0000 --000000000000fa971305900d5477 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Tibor, Many thanks for your reply! Would you be able to do a review if the deadline for this first stage (verification of security assessments) will be moved from September, 15th, to October, 15th? Best regards, Stanislav =D0=B2=D1=82, 13 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 11:20, Tibor Jager= : > Dear Stanislav, > > These reviews and the corresponding deadlines come at an unfortunate time > for me, as I already told Alexey last week. > > I am currently in the process of moving to a different university, my > starting date there is September 1st. I am currently spending 110% of my > time to make sure that all research funds and staff are transferred in du= e > order, such that all students will remain funded, which is much less > trivial than what I would have expected. I also have to organize lectures > at my old and new university, make sure that students are taken care of, > etc., and will soon have to start preparing new lectures. > > Of course I will try to help as much as possible with the reviews, but it > is currently very difficult for me to make any promises and binding > commitments, given the rather tight reviewing deadlines. > > Yours sincerely, > > Tibor > > > > Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev writes: > > > Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will > verify the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will > review 4 PAKEs. > > > > I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jage= r > will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs. > > Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which > of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer? > > > > Best regards, > > Stanislav, > > CFRG Secretary > > > > > > =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron S= heffer >: > > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review > > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. > > > > Thanks, > > Yaron > > > > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: > >> Alexey: > >> > >> I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other > >> gathered material for the submissions, as needed. > >> > >> Russ > >> > >> > >>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! > >>> > >>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection > >>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. > >>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the > >>> following: > >>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs > >>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th > 2019. > >>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials > >>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are > >>> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. > >>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate > >>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. > >>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. > >>> > >>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. > >>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or > >>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to > >>> do that). > >>> > >>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your > >>> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 > >>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of > them). > >>> > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Crypto-panel mailing list > >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org Crypto-panel@irtf.org> > >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Crypto-panel mailing list > >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Crypto-panel mailing list > > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > > --000000000000fa971305900d5477 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Tibor,

Many thanks for your reply!=
Would you be able to do a review if the deadline for this first = stage (verification of security assessments) will be moved from September, = 15th, to October, 15th?

Best regards,
St= anislav

=D0=B2=D1=82, 13 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 11:20= , Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@upb.de<= /a>>:
Dear St= anislav,

These reviews and the corresponding deadlines come at an unfortunate time f= or me, as I already told Alexey last week.

I am currently in the process of moving to a different university, my start= ing date there is September 1st. I am currently spending 110% of my time to= make sure that all research funds and staff are transferred in due order, = such that all students will remain funded, which is much less trivial than = what I would have expected. I also have to organize lectures at my old and = new university, make sure that students are taken care of, etc., and will s= oon have to start preparing new lectures.

Of course I will try to help as much as possible with the reviews, but it i= s currently very difficult for me to make any promises and binding commitme= nts, given the rather tight reviewing deadlines.

Yours sincerely,

Tibor



Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> writes:

> Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will= verify the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will r= eview 4 PAKEs.
>
> I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jag= er will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs.
> Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which= of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer? >
> Best regards,
> Stanislav,
> CFRG Secretary
>
>
> =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron = Sheffer <yaro= nf.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>>:
> Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review<= br> > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.
>
> Thanks,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Yaron
>
> On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Alexey:
>>
>> I am not the right person to review proofs.=C2=A0 I will review th= e other
>> gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
>>
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com<= /a><mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
>>> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com<mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>&g= t;> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
>>>
>>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE se= lection
>>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
>>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to d= o the
>>> following:
>>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security= proofs
>>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September= 15th 2019.
>>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials >>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations ar= e
>>> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the desi= gners.
>>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all cand= idate
>>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and veri= fied.
>>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
>>>
>>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
>>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balan= ced or
>>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is ha= ppy to
>>> do that).
>>>
>>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about yo= ur
>>> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal w= ith 4
>>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all = 8 of them).
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>>> Cry= pto-panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org> <mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org<mail= to:Crypto-panel@= irtf.org>>
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo= /crypto-panel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>> Crypto-= panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cry= pto-panel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-pane= l@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-= panel

--000000000000fa971305900d5477-- From nobody Tue Aug 13 23:11:00 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE74412006A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 23:10:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPE1mRj6p6hf for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 23:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2a.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:104:0:2:25:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9055120059 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 23:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C79DA10E8; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:10:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id X3VmAeVVlGWn; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:10:46 +0200 (CEST) References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> From: Tibor Jager To: crypto-panel@irtf.org Cc: Pierre-Alain Fouque , "cfrg-chairs\@ietf.org" , Alexey Melnikov , Scott Fluhrer In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:10:45 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:10:59 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stanislav, Yes, this would make it much easier for me. Thank you. I do not have a preference w.r.t. balanced / augmented PAKE, so please assi= gn to me whatever makes most sense. Cheers, Tibor Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev writes: > Dear Tibor, > > Many thanks for your reply! > Would you be able to do a review if the deadline for this first stage > (verification of security assessments) will be moved from September, 15th, > to October, 15th? > > Best regards, > Stanislav > > =D0=B2=D1=82, 13 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 11:20, Tibor Jag= er : > >> Dear Stanislav, >> >> These reviews and the corresponding deadlines come at an unfortunate time >> for me, as I already told Alexey last week. >> >> I am currently in the process of moving to a different university, my >> starting date there is September 1st. I am currently spending 110% of my >> time to make sure that all research funds and staff are transferred in d= ue >> order, such that all students will remain funded, which is much less >> trivial than what I would have expected. I also have to organize lectures >> at my old and new university, make sure that students are taken care of, >> etc., and will soon have to start preparing new lectures. >> >> Of course I will try to help as much as possible with the reviews, but it >> is currently very difficult for me to make any promises and binding >> commitments, given the rather tight reviewing deadlines. >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> Tibor >> >> >> >> Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev writes: >> >> > Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will >> verify the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will >> review 4 PAKEs. >> > >> > I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jag= er >> will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs. >> > Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which >> of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Stanislav, >> > CFRG Secretary >> > >> > >> > =D0=BF=D0=BD, 12 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 10:29, Yaron = Sheffer > >: >> > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review >> > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Yaron >> > >> > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote: >> >> Alexey: >> >> >> >> I am not the right person to review proofs. I will review the other >> >> gathered material for the submissions, as needed. >> >> >> >> Russ >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov > >> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members! >> >>> >> >>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection >> >>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members. >> >>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the >> >>> following: >> >>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs >> >>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th >> 2019. >> >>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials >> >>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are >> >>> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. >> >>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate >> >>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified. >> >>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019. >> >>> >> >>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented. >> >>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or >> >>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to >> >>> do that). >> >>> >> >>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your >> >>> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 >> >>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of >> them). >> >>> >> >>> Best Regards, >> >>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs) >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Crypto-panel mailing list >> >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org > Crypto-panel@irtf.org> >> >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Crypto-panel mailing list >> >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Crypto-panel mailing list >> > Crypto-panel@irtf.org >> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyRg3TFk4qfnEtSUUStX143RDyIQFAl1TpeUACgkQStX143RD yIQERw/+JC1NqgJ+pfapWIeX4mbaqI8SrRdoZlDdDI7PKFBq87VwJUdO6v/IVxsZ poenzNIa3AbuJiPmcVk//jqXiayz7SdZhAId77vJ53PkD4D+L5wJ5my3f6tb7HKK 28XifIquC8qictEPev+MK7cKIFvnCxJDbE/l7HsBTA7NSsD2UK+o+Dea40niOD1y d/ItsKrwXVOdMwsiQ7K6j5eG7JdTJ/sT+529rdFPzabPXffsieRRhrrg+0RR2G+f K/Cv7Yk3gGS38XUD/Stbl3qh1YLs0xRM5iytpGGCF1d1OZ5XBqVkGXO/WUFabucf dMux2yC1YLxgA8tEzAtyymMBf7mrw0lsLaGuBBCjgRmWhDiMC1ukROTjAuilxYFy h0wj4dSubdAixoO53hjtDTVjGR60x0FweLHwgC8zM7qu295+iZDHj4Qek8HcIVYF dqkLI4T5B8KPW1kNEJYaBW1xZq4XNsoW0bvCyArBPjoy2PS7yckpBnGdm0ALoXf3 xAQtu9pC22almSplhjhIU3QTLdmAqaKElGfV8g/bNEWEtGTnQ3AqUK1BThHCnIaQ c8YpL7EfiZadhVs5saJuNjgUI54Wh5TyjO9E0ncHNfQQ5SudC5nKoGgM/mYg7T4D DH4Q+5Ow3rCv7qTHOKHLaAZkkptSNuqAadCuJJ8wGcl2CAXxmaI= =+6AU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--