From bclaise@cisco.com Fri Feb 1 11:23:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CB721E8039; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:23:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.554 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ob7dpBZrIX5; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:23:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AEB21E808B; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:23:29 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r11JLYpn016045; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:21:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r11JL538009677; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:21:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <510BDC45.1070209@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:16:21 +0000 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20130131222822.3478.48185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130131222822.3478.48185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130131222822.3478.48185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-07 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:23:30 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the February 7th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Feb 6th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-07 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2013-01-31 14:27:32 PST Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-17 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) (Proposed Standard) Note: The document shepherd for this document is Alissa Cooper (acooper@cdt.org). Token: Robert Sparks o draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-09 UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Packets (Proposed Standard) Note: Gorry Fairhurst (gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk) is the document shepherd. Token: Martin Stiemerling o draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-08 PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods (Proposed Standard) Note: Susan Thomson (sethomso@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd Token: Stephen Farrell o draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-10 Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 (Proposed Standard) Note: Hannes Tschofenig (Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net) is the document shepherd. Token: Stephen Farrell o draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-04 Encryption of Header Extensions in the Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) (Proposed Standard) Note: Roni Even (ron.even.tlv@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Robert Sparks o draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10 Link Management Protocol Behavior Negotiation and Configuration Modifications (Proposed Standard) Note: Deborah Brungard (db3546@att.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel 2.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-11 Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI. (Best Current Practice) Note: Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melnikov@isode.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items NONE 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses-10 A Framework for IP and MPLS Fast Reroute Using Not-via Addresses (Informational) Note: Alvaro Retana (aretana@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel o draft-ietf-rtgwg-ordered-fib-09 Framework for Loop-free convergence using oFIB (Informational) Note: Alvaro Retana (aretana@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel o draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-15 Reactive Discovery of Point-to-Point Routes in Low Power and Lossy Networks (Experimental) Note: The Document Shepherd is JP Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com). Token: Adrian Farrel o draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-08 A Mechanism to Measure the Routing Metrics along a Point-to-point Route in a Low Power and Lossy Network (Experimental) Note: The Document Shepherd is JP Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com). Token: Adrian Farrel o draft-ietf-eman-requirements-11 Requirements for Energy Management (Informational) Note: Nevil Brownlee (n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz) is the document shepherd. Token: Ronald Bonica 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items NONE 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.3.1 New Items o conflict-review-levine-tld-variant-00 IETF conflict review for draft-levine-tld-variant draft-levine-tld-variant-06 Variants in Second-Level Names Registered in Top Level Domains (ISE: Informational) Token: Barry Leiba 3.3.2 Returning Items o conflict-review-hartmann-default-port-for-irc-via-tls-ssl-00 IETF conflict review for draft-hartmann-default-port-for-irc-via-tls-ssl draft-hartmann-default-port-for-irc-via-tls-ssl-08 Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL (ISE: Informational) Token: Stephen Farrell 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o Web PKI OPS (wpkops) 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review o Common Authentication Technology Next Generation (kitten) 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Mon Feb 11 12:29:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC1121F8A99 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.546 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AfiFNOACqvn9 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (mail-vb0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A807E21F8A96 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e21so4011199vbm.34 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=K/cJ+sfgozTBwYPRTjv7pASHFx6UNU2cQ9YfGE1GYoY=; b=jy37OrrXF/1HFnUxfBzgaaY0+1+1mlxIj/KFjktx6FuBRegv2PR0GkdE9oxQ8U429p sdIot7pt8W+jsJxmDJQ1/olxgfw3Jbm4Zur/jhnsF4Em3Zy5X5e5vuvecmy6GRqcAlnL 35W4aqJeheNRe5zSLIItaahXAkU52X+8Zmzo6nJgzoy2C7YowqAkgxfptTuSEr5E3EGM 9eiRj9dBjfFPUj4m+327SvsJrTSO0LcPhaWpH2pPrejWbGO5SS/LPZPlUnToQ1m9HIu9 1hPSM85Mqm6qqvbDANxuRWdHAYBIbz5ix9FlrNum9vhTzEGN0lSQec1zoxU2R4XTBp9N o0EQ== X-Received: by 10.52.90.243 with SMTP id bz19mr17626831vdb.112.1360614593881; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:69bc:acf3:9729:9034? ([2001:420:2481:20:69bc:acf3:9729:9034]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qj8sm60611554veb.2.2013.02.11.12.29.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:29:52 -0800 (PST) From: Ralph Droms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:29:50 -0500 Message-Id: To: Andrew Sullivan Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: IETF DNS Directorate Subject: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:29:55 -0000 Andrew - I see that you are listed as having reviewed a previous = revision of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic. Do you have = any thoughts on draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 that = should be reflected in my IESG review? If anyone else cares to review = draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13, I'll happily accept the = additional input. - Ralph From ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Tue Feb 12 11:24:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D1C21F90E1 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:24:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.84 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25yMLHG+j316 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:24:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBA921F90B6 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-05-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BBA18A031 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:23:56 -0500 From: Andrew Sullivan To: dns-dir@ietf.org Message-ID: <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info> References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:24:02 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:25:22PM +0000, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: > Andrew - I see that you are listed as having reviewed a previous revision of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic. Do you have any thoughts on draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 that should be reflected in my IESG review? > The problem I tripped over last time was the use of NXRRSET, which isn't what turned out to be wanted. This was fixed in -12. I'll be perfectly honest that I think this entire thing is a massive, unsustainable kludge. But given that it's all part of the NAT64 craptacular pile, that's not really an objection, and being one of the offenders who made that pile as high as it is I can hardly object anyway. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Fri Feb 15 14:24:12 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B3821E805F for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.542 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C+8gaOnzxICG for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E784921E804B for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fj18so2414318vbb.26 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=nLqQ1u3yukUHhqITNLp5Diflj1m8Fgv48CYl3V8fDqs=; b=SCVpu+5iWAsqC4/EG3xtAHIkX+aeC3UXShqFMdoal+gQ8WLokOUFzGQUs5XFfzN3y8 qSHZ1IVaobr/jXpJryj6ZbQbgFKKKDI+IaYxmTYM3faRi2s87Py6+CHw7AOmo/uL9yw8 aKcagqbwO80uMb+db/6mjHeEFQMCTcu5ZajMRH77f61OC09D70eaff6EsxFiDwKQds6Z +6EcN/WSHfduvFwTGmqy5HLTvbeOSHzZTDEQXkzWcaNvVLURgVuVqThRtvJrjD3NThE8 9wmvo+wmsSYE8Wp15WofThMYAIu5Vn/EXScDQsX9DQjPuvVPXkJpTDiOCVjfSdnlD2YN CcCw== X-Received: by 10.220.219.80 with SMTP id ht16mr5324921vcb.30.1360967049630; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:4108:7e86:8718:b9f8? ([2001:420:2481:20:4108:7e86:8718:b9f8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm41322821vdi.13.2013.02.15.14.24.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:24:08 -0800 (PST) From: Ralph Droms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <667C0EE9-C972-4CFF-BD04-5642C7C5E6D2@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:24:07 -0500 To: IETF Directorate DNS Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Subject: [dns-dir] review of draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:24:12 -0000 draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig-01 is being considered for publication as = an AD-sponsored individual submission. I have a first review by Andrew = Sullivan, who thinks the specification would be of some value and the = document is ready for further review. I'm looking for a volunteer to do = another DNS review (and CGA, if someone has expertise there, as well) = before we submit the document for publication. Any takers? - Ralph From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Feb 18 06:09:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED6821F89AF; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:09:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.539 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VnH4Y3c-6cQ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1A321F89A6; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:09:20 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1IE9JjA022948; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:09:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1IE93tG019557; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:09:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <512235FF.10602@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:09:03 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20130215001805.25312.54571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130215001805.25312.54571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130215001805.25312.54571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-21 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:09:22 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the February 21st IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Feb 20th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-21 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2013-02-14 16:17:05 PST Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-07 - IETF stream MPLS and Ethernet OAM Interworking (Proposed Standard) Note: Matthew Bocci (matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-03 - IETF stream Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (Proposed Standard) Token: Brian Haberman Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 - IETF stream Discovery of the IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis (Proposed Standard) Note: Document Shepherd: Dave Thaler (dthaler@microsoft.com) Token: Wesley Eddy Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-06 - IETF stream Entity MIB (Version 4) (Proposed Standard) Note: The document shepherd is Nevil Brownlee (n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz). Token: Benoit Claise Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-08 - IETF stream RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting (Proposed Standard) Note: Dan Romascanu (dromasca@avaya.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Gonzalo Camarillo Consensus: Unknown 2.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24 - IETF stream REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol (Proposed Standard) Note: David Bryan (dbryan@ethernot.org) is the document shepherd. Token: Gonzalo Camarillo Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-19 o draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-11 - IETF stream Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions (Proposed Standard) Note: Jouni Korhonen (jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Benoit Claise Consensus: Unknown 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items o draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01 - IETF stream Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types (Proposed Standard) Note: Joel Halpern (jmh@joelhalpern.com) is the Docment Shepherd Token: Ronald Bonica Consensus: Unknown 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-13 - IETF stream Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements (Informational) Note: Document Shepherd is Gabor Bajko (Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com). Token: Pete Resnick Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-15 o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-08 - IETF stream MPLS-TP Security Framework (Informational) Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00 - IETF stream Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes DPA, ADVERTISER and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID (Informational) Token: Stewart Bryant Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-simple-simple-08 - IETF stream SIMPLE made Simple: An Overview of the IETF Specifications for Instant Messaging and Presence using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) Note: The document shepherd for this document is Ben Campbell (ben@nostrum.com). Token: Robert Sparks Consensus: Yes 3.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04 - IETF stream Applicability of Access Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks (Informational) Note: Matthew Bocci (matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-19 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items o draft-templin-intarea-seal-51 - IETF stream The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) (Informational) Note: Joe Touch (touch@isi.edu) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-20 o draft-templin-ironbis-12 - IETF stream The Intradomain Routing Overlay Network (IRON) (Informational) Token: Ralph Droms Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-18 o draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-02 - IETF stream Registration of Second-Level URN Namespaces Under "ietf" (Informational) Note: Barry Leiba (barryleiba@computer.org) is serving as the document shepherd as well as author. Token: Pete Resnick Consensus: Unknown o draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-04 - IETF stream The application/sql Media Type (Informational) Token: Barry Leiba Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-20 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o Web PKI OPS (wpkops) 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval o Common Authentication Technology Next Generation (kitten) From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Tue Feb 19 05:09:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A391521F8BB6 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.547 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2lR+pB-J115 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f52.google.com (mail-vb0-f52.google.com [209.85.212.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134AF21F8B84 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fa15so4154129vbb.39 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=GpUgnSxl6rf6HV/YW9dFQpKj2zQFLA5Dy1593nbfFWU=; b=BB6/QAYGeRoPftD74HhS+qF9neXo1aicwNdLYVmyT3VerapH31yTSeGHQfWQDvEzxN wZjh/MXqFrj3ZKQesKDkxsMNcp8N5AVikDspIpcfpm1a7hKM+MvvQFH3PZICDPIi6QXS +E9ZR98KT697nw0huLY4+zaPOWBGvORRuEL/bsjtMGV1WgU/2DRcdM3iaixfgVLHf9PO 4w88Q26huuIMPVIt3AsNrYS13Ys78uX/LEjLe3t6Dv+MEKfAQdNGiaDS3Tx6ODCIw7qe BO3JZtq43sLz18jGqMZC6FtzDqdbV0KUsIMtFX8KQSAlYUJuymvHJzfzNPbXLoghkQ2s a2Jw== X-Received: by 10.52.20.177 with SMTP id o17mr18351977vde.17.1361279364475; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:3443:d20e:4924:2f2? ([2001:420:2481:20:3443:d20e:4924:2f2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly6sm101252462veb.3.2013.02.19.05.09.21 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:09:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Ralph Droms In-Reply-To: <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:09:20 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0370390A-9855-4F41-8E1F-05FDA9A875D6@gmail.com> References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info> To: Andrew Sullivan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: dns-dir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:09:25 -0000 On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:23 PM 2/12/13, Andrew Sullivan = wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:25:22PM +0000, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: >> Andrew - I see that you are listed as having reviewed a previous = revision of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic. Do you have = any thoughts on draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 that = should be reflected in my IESG review? >>=20 >=20 > The problem I tripped over last time was the use of NXRRSET, which > isn't what turned out to be wanted. This was fixed in -12. >=20 > I'll be perfectly honest that I think this entire thing is a massive, > unsustainable kludge. But given that it's all part of the NAT64 > craptacular pile, that's not really an objection, and being one of the > offenders who made that pile as high as it is I can hardly object > anyway. One more question: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 is in ready to = publish, waiting in cluster C83. Did you consider section 5, Domain = Name Reservation Considerations, of that document; specifically, = although draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 has not yet been = published, is it worth the effort to answer the questions in section 5? - Ralph >=20 > A >=20 > --=20 > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@anvilwalrusden.com > _______________________________________________ > dns-dir mailing list > dns-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir From ajs@anvilwalrusden.com Tue Feb 19 05:47:05 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F33321F8CFB for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:47:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.84 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zlZmM42+DL8E for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:47:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B42B21F8D02 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:47:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 490E08A031; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:47:02 -0500 From: Andrew Sullivan To: Ralph Droms Message-ID: <20130219134702.GB22289@mx1.yitter.info> References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info> <0370390A-9855-4F41-8E1F-05FDA9A875D6@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0370390A-9855-4F41-8E1F-05FDA9A875D6@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dns-dir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:47:05 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:09:20AM -0500, Ralph Droms wrote: > One more question: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 is in > ready to publish, waiting in cluster C83. Oh, interesting. I thought maybe that document had submerged because of how it impinges on the relationship with ICANN. But if it's going to get published, then. . . > Did you consider section > 5, Domain Name Reservation Considerations, of that document; > specifically, although draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 has > not yet been published, is it worth the effort to answer the > questions in section 5? . . . yes, it is, and no, I didn't consider them. Note that this particular name doesn't have any implications for the root zone, though it does require IANA action to register the name in .arpa. Here are the answers, in any case: 1. No, although this is a name in .arpa and therefore is sort of already marked as special. 2. Yes. Any application attempting to perform NAT64 discovery will query the name. 3. Yes, to the extent the API or library is affected by NAT64. 4. No. 5. No. 6. This name has effects for operators of NAT64/DNS64, but otherwise is just another .arpa name. 7. The registry for .arpa is held at IANA, and only IANA needs to take action here. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Tue Feb 19 08:24:44 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F02121F8E0C for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9moGC097TyZB for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3923921F8A3E for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m18so4392744vcm.36 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=aQGmbldvvxERquOqM9B1z1pA0Zg4DIX5HUIFSEFHcLo=; b=TuXyVtMPOYDGcyWdpr6G8TRmMEXDKNJGh3dWqka8N8EqeA/KwHjOkfCIZDkI3uhTZp 8Xv4g66WzZfw50ZSjnKFzL3b+UJw5+4bwsAT4ypUnAiZlw2CC0+xKuHNc1IeXGFbKBg+ ghSCBBoZP6qW2FgI2bz99NjKR7Ncvv/VEWWaeKO82uRsgw6qEBalWGTZGrTZNZmjWqNQ F2EG5xtjSD5vpdOJn7IHwsLTQcqQurVDxKKl6HORAf81cL4idxN2CUuKq/rvgDvyteY8 hhKrF8KgMHwT3l3Uz4kDNtgKstGnDwhAp0effrrG8yoAYzZZYla2qbfVcE9DPd5if05E r8MA== X-Received: by 10.52.34.170 with SMTP id a10mr19185212vdj.54.1361291079663; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2c51:1311:e123:1b78:f56b:cf9c? ([2001:420:2c51:1311:e123:1b78:f56b:cf9c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mj8sm102131218veb.8.2013.02.19.08.24.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:24:38 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Ralph Droms In-Reply-To: <20130219134702.GB22289@mx1.yitter.info> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:24:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA34C673A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <20130212192356.GF8091@mx1.yitter.info> <0370390A-9855-4F41-8E1F-05FDA9A875D6@gmail.com> <20130219134702.GB22289@mx1.yitter.info> To: Andrew Sullivan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: "dns-dir@ietf.org DNS Directorate" Subject: Re: [dns-dir] draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13 X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:24:44 -0000 On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:47 AM 2/19/13, Andrew Sullivan = wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:09:20AM -0500, Ralph Droms wrote: >=20 >> One more question: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 is in >> ready to publish, waiting in cluster C83. >=20 > Oh, interesting. I thought maybe that document had submerged because > of how it impinges on the relationship with ICANN. But if it's going > to get published, then. . .=20 Yes, I expect it to be published soon. >=20 >> Did you consider section >> 5, Domain Name Reservation Considerations, of that document; >> specifically, although draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-03 has >> not yet been published, is it worth the effort to answer the >> questions in section 5? >=20 > . . . yes, it is, and no, I didn't consider them. Note that this > particular name doesn't have any implications for the root zone, > though it does require IANA action to register the name in .arpa. > Here are the answers, in any case: >=20 > 1. No, although this is a name in .arpa and therefore is sort of > already marked as special. >=20 > 2. Yes. Any application attempting to perform NAT64 discovery will > query the name. >=20 > 3. Yes, to the extent the API or library is affected by NAT64. >=20 > 4. No. >=20 > 5. No. >=20 > 6. This name has effects for operators of NAT64/DNS64, but otherwise > is just another .arpa name. >=20 > 7. The registry for .arpa is held at IANA, and only IANA needs to > take action here. Thanks a lot for offering that text. - Ralph >=20 > A >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Wed Feb 20 06:42:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCA221F87D7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.543 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBIqTt1IPFyt for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com (mail-ve0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B03C21F8788 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so7037476vea.30 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=tdnLzdwYPoYuU3Qqot1J/kTnbxI3ejd28O0i3/UuDWQ=; b=NB7UyVin2xPhvbjDoo5QsUDXP72kjxV/PdlbCcQ07eOR9WwDJQIGti9F2r63aPohO/ 1tsp7Otksy5qzWj4xs9mGElQ23UVZ18sjI97ez8P0/Pk2ZFSRqXxlKLx/2EqBjmlKwUg XY/630VQXlTopZSu0LC1GorCC5UY80rZV9vBBc5QuwGkJBuiQ/D1zCU5eCn8SUqxNflr 0ge+wfI7iry5ZcX4wT0x4xxKKoZugN7sEV6DRIyQp7TMODNgJn5KO3EqTEQ/vBZ5nvki dV5xKCNXny6waE4N9zYqJdAkKsBo6jMKHCishtQf2FNpd5QH1gsddijawSOPwPYV1hiA hkWA== X-Received: by 10.52.16.35 with SMTP id c3mr23260848vdd.90.1361371353523; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2c51:1311:e123:1b78:f56b:cf9c? ([2001:420:2c51:1311:e123:1b78:f56b:cf9c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cl9sm108513944vdb.3.2013.02.20.06.42.32 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:42:32 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Ralph Droms In-Reply-To: <667C0EE9-C972-4CFF-BD04-5642C7C5E6D2@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:42:30 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A74E653-93EE-44CB-B7C3-96FDA573EB4D@gmail.com> References: <667C0EE9-C972-4CFF-BD04-5642C7C5E6D2@gmail.com> To: IETF Directorate DNS X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Subject: Re: [dns-dir] review of draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig (2nd try) X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:42:43 -0000 I don't think I've seen a response; a volunteer to review the document = would be greatly appreciated. On Feb 15, 2013, at 5:24 PM 2/15/13, Ralph Droms = wrote: > draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig-01 is being considered for publication = as an AD-sponsored individual submission. I have a first review by = Andrew Sullivan, who thinks the specification would be of some value and = the document is ready for further review. I'm looking for a volunteer = to do another DNS review (and CGA, if someone has expertise there, as = well) before we submit the document for publication. Any takers? >=20 > - Ralph >=20 From bclaise@cisco.com Fri Feb 22 09:34:49 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE19821F8E21; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:34:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.544 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L51xbm0LAt4V; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:34:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDFC21F8E17; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:34:48 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1MHYjGZ029156; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1MHYS10017204; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5127AC23.2070408@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:27 +0100 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20130222144423.31635.38700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130222144423.31635.38700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130222144423.31635.38700.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-28 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:34:49 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the February 28th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before Feb 27th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2013-02-28 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2013-02-22 06:43:30 PST Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03 - IETF stream Processing of IPv6 "atomic" fragments (Proposed Standard) Token: Brian Haberman Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07 - IETF stream Secure DHCPv6 Using CGAs (Proposed Standard) Note: Ted Lemon (ted.lemon@nominum.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-25 o draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt-04 - IETF stream Client Link-layer Address Option in DHCPv6 (Proposed Standard) Note: Ted Lemon (Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms IANA Review: IANA Review Needed Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-28 o draft-ietf-geopriv-flow-identity-01 - IETF stream Flow Identity Extension for HELD (Proposed Standard) Note: Alissa Cooper (acooper@cdt.org) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Robert Sparks IANA Review: IANA Review Needed Consensus: Yes Last call expires: 2013-02-27 2.1.2 Returning Items NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items o draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-09 - IETF stream Additional XML Security Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) (Proposed Standard) Note: Charlie Kaufman is the document shepherd (charliek@microsoft.com). Token: Sean Turner Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-28 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction-04 - IETF stream Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP (Experimental) Note: Document Shepherd is Pasi Sarolahti . Token: Wesley Eddy Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-26 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items o draft-harkins-brainpool-ike-groups-04 - IETF stream Brainpool Elliptic Curves for the IKE Group Description Registry (Informational) Note: Johannes Merkle (johannes.merkle@secunet.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Sean Turner Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-28 o draft-cardenas-dff-09 - IETF stream Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF) (Experimental) Note: Document Shepherd: Geoff Mulligan (geoff.ietf@mulligan.com) Token: Ralph Droms Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-02-24 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o Hypertext Transmission Protocol Authentication (httpauth) 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar (jcardcal) 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review o Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (xmpp) 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE