From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Apr 8 13:51:06 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F5F21F8E06; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:51:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.182 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bglNiJjDoXo4; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4215421F8DEF; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:51:04 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r38Koubi000773; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:50:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r38KocOK002231; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51632D52.40903@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:49:22 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20130404211034.5344.58207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130404211034.5344.58207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130404211034.5344.58207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2013-04-11 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:51:06 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the April 11th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before April 10th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2013-04-11 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2013-04-04 14:09:34 PDT Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-16 - IETF stream X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP (Proposed Standard) Note: Document Shepherd: Steve Kent (kent@bbn.com) Token: Sean Turner IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension-06 - IETF stream The TLS Multiple Certificate Status Request Extension (Proposed Standard) Note: Document Shepherd - Joe Salowey (jsalowey@cisco.com) Token: Sean Turner IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger-12 - IETF stream WebFinger (Proposed Standard) Note: Salvatore Loreto (Salvatore.Loreto@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Barry Leiba IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 2.1.2 Returning Items NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items o draft-saintandre-urn-example-04 - IETF stream A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Examples (Best Current Practice) Token: Barry Leiba IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown Last call expires: 2013-04-09 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06 - IETF stream Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments (Informational) Token: Brian Haberman IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 3.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-07 - IETF stream SAVI Threat Scope (Informational) Note: Jean-Michel Combes (jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items o draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03 - IETF stream Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange (Informational) Note: Dan Harkins (dharkins@lounge.org) is the document shepherd. Token: Sean Turner IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.3.1 New Items o conflict-review-templin-v6ops-isops-00 IETF conflict review for draft-templin-v6ops-isops draft-templin-v6ops-isops-18 Operational Guidance for IPv6 Deployment in IPv4 Sites using ISATAP (ISE: Informational) Token: Joel Jaeggli 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review o IMAP QRESYNC Extension (qresync) 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review o Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose) 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE From Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu Fri Apr 12 02:24:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197C021F8AF8 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:24:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObE1vXS6ovCF for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124D221F8B07 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DD8103BEF; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:23:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de) Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fM+1nH3BkOBv; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:23:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0EF103BEC; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:23:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.99.64] (10.1.99.64) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:22:51 +0200 Message-ID: <5167D29A.7050306@neclab.eu> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:23:38 +0200 From: Martin Stiemerling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olafur Gudmundsson References: <5154BDB1.6090208@innovationslab.net> <171C1602-F6CC-4A29-B5CA-EDB44B247995@ogud.com> In-Reply-To: <171C1602-F6CC-4A29-B5CA-EDB44B247995@ogud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.1.99.64] Cc: IETF DNS Directorate , Ted Lemon Subject: Re: [dns-dir] Review request X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:24:16 -0000 Thanks for the review and we are currently working through it! Martin On 03/29/2013 03:13 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > I reviewed the document and this is a well written clear document with some deficiencies. > > The introduction is real good at explaining what the document is attempting. > > The procedure(s) proposed are based of the implicit assumption that provisioning of reverse DNS is > somehow related to service provision for another protocol, which may or may not be the case. > > Question #1: How is dual stack handled in queries? > in sequence or in parallel ? > if sequence which one first ? > > Question #2 What about hosts with multiple links? > > The procedures expect hope to get back PTR records and the name in the PTR record > is used for further lookups. (good) > The fundamental question is are all attempts to find PTR exhausted before going to next step? > > Question #3: what about the case when there are multiple PTR records in the answer? > > If the lookup fails the procedure hopes to find SOA record in the negative answer, > extracts from the SOA record the name of the "Master DNS server" MNAME, > and uses that name to do further lookups. > > Comment #1: Master DNS servers are not always reachable, as they are hidden masters or > traffic protected. Frequently there is no correlation between the zone name and the Mname > I did a randomly selected reverse lookup on 185.55.55.55 > 185.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN SOA pri.authdns.ripe.net. dns.ripe.net. ……. > > In this case it is obvious (to a human) the SOA is useless and the algorithm should terminate, > what the procedure as specified will do is to cause many queries to the RIR name servers for lots of names that have > no PTR records and no delegations. > > Question #4: Why MNAME but not the owner name of the SOA ? (explain or point to explanation) > > Question #5: What is the point of the explicit SOA query for reverse name and why do editors expect to get a different answer than in the PTR question ? > > Section #4: > there is no mention about the expected extra traffic to RIR (and or ISP) DNS server when the PTR lookup fails, > I would like to see some text on how to abort the algorithms early I.e. > SOA present --- useful SOA ---> do lookup > +-------- useless SOA ---> algorithm failed > > > This boat has probably sailed but I will ask it anyway: > Question #6 Why not place the NAPTR records in the reverse tree? > > Editing comment: It would be helpful if the text from section 3 bullet 1 about what address to look up was included in section 2 before the > diagrams of the algorithms (or at least pointer to address selection). > > Olafur > > > > On Mar 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > >> Hi all, >> The ALTO WG is considering the adoption of a draft focused on the discovery of an ALTO server using DNS (but not SRV records). Martin (TSV AD) has requested an early DNS Directorate review. Could I get a volunteer (or two) to review the draft for DNS sanity? >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kist-alto-3pdisc/ >> >> Regards, >> Brian >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-dir mailing list >> dns-dir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir > -- martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu NEC Laboratories Europe NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB Registered in England 2832014 From bclaise@cisco.com Fri Apr 19 02:27:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F38421F937B; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:27:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.441 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzK8oawjtcxg; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DAF21F8AA8; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:27:30 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3J9RSi0007343; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:27:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.88] (ams-bclaise-8917.cisco.com [10.60.67.88]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3J9RC6W027030; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:27:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51710DF0.6040206@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:27:12 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" , "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" , YANG Doctors , "ops-dir@ietf.org" , IETF DNS Directorate References: <20130418220652.8672.81414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130418220652.8672.81414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130418220652.8672.81414.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dns-dir] Fwd: [IESG-AGENDA-DIST] Summarized Agenda for the 2013-04-25 IESG Teleconference X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:27:31 -0000 Dear all, Please find below the agenda of the April 25th IESG telechat. Please send your questions, comments and concerns before April 24th COB. Thanks and Regards, Benoit -------- Original Message -------- INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG) Summarized Agenda for the 2013-04-25 IESG Teleconference This agenda was generated at 2013-04-18 15:05:26 PDT Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ 2. Protocol Actions 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-core-coap-15 - IETF stream Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) (Proposed Standard) Token: Barry Leiba IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-07 - IETF stream MPLS-TP Next-Hop Ethernet Addressing (Proposed Standard) Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-03 - IETF stream OSPFv3 Instance ID Registry Update (Proposed Standard) Note: Acee Lindem (acee.lindem@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13 - IETF stream RTP Control Protocol(RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Discard metric Reporting (Proposed Standard) Note: Dan Romascanu (dromasca@avaya.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Gonzalo Camarillo IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-04 - IETF stream Autonomous System (AS) Reservation for Private Use (Best Current Practice) Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-10 - IETF stream Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNSSEC (Proposed Standard) Note: Patrik Faltstrom (paf@frobbit.se) is the Document Shepherd Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown o draft-ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-08 - IETF stream Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Internet Gateway Device (IGD)-Port Control Protocol (PCP) Interworking Function (Proposed Standard) Note: Dave Thaler (dthaler@microsoft.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ted Lemon IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 2.1.2 Returning Items NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items NONE 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 2.3 Status Changes 2.3.1 New Items NONE 2.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions 3.1.1 New Items o draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-metrics-rationale-03 - IETF stream Link Metrics for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Routing Protocol OLSRv2 - Rationale (Informational) Note: Stan Ratliff (sratliff@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Yes o draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-11 - IETF stream Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets (Informational) Note: Acee Lindem (acee.lindem@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Stewart Bryant IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed Consensus: Unknown 3.1.2 Returning Items o draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-08 - IETF stream FCAST: Object Delivery for the ALC and NORM Protocols (Experimental) Note: Lorenzo Vicisano (lorenzo@vicisano.net) is the document shepherd. Token: Martin Stiemerling Consensus: Unknown 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD 3.2.1 New Items NONE 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 Status Changes 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents 3.4.1 New Items NONE 3.4.2 Returning Items o conflict-review-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00 IETF conflict review for draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-04 A TCP Authentication Option NAT Extension (ISE: Experimental) Token: Martin Stiemerling 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval o IMAP QRESYNC Extension (qresync) 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review o Forwarding and Control Element Separation (forces) 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval o Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (jose) From bclaise@cisco.com Wed Apr 24 08:38:46 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1FC21F9381 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHgMNxAVJ3Vd for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C1421F9361 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:38:32 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3OFcVT7000770 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3OFcFAd012617 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5177FC66.1070605@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:38:14 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IETF DNS Directorate Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040905030406030208090807" Subject: [dns-dir] Home page updated. X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:38:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040905030406030208090807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/dns.html now contains: When reviewing a specific draft, the review will be sent to the DNS directorate mailing list (dns-dir@ietf.org ), to the draft authors, WG chairs, and respective AD. The way to reach the authors, WG chairs, and respective AD is to send an email to .all@tools.ietf.org . Mailing list: dns-dir@ietf.org Regards, Benoit --------------040905030406030208090807 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all,

http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/dns.html now contains:

When reviewing a specific draft, the review will be sent to the DNS  directorate mailing list (dns-dir@ietf.org), to the draft authors, WG chairs, and respective AD. The way to reach the authors, WG chairs, and respective AD is to send an email to <draft-name>.all@tools.ietf.org.

Mailing list: dns-dir@ietf.org

Regards, Benoit


--------------040905030406030208090807--