From alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at Mon Nov 9 06:41:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746213A69C8 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:41:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.687 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.743, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KNUvvv64h5c for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sbg.nic.at (mail.sbg.nic.at [192.174.68.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB4F3A6942 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by mail.sbg.nic.at with XWall v3.44 ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:41:45 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:41:47 +0100 Message-ID: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D466508A8C3A1@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Fyi... Upcoming VoIP peering work in DISPATCH Thread-Index: AcphSsQktDs1nWb4Q8CX+xMR5QpZ7w== From: "Alexander Mayrhofer" To: X-XWALL-BCKS: auto Subject: [drinks] Fyi... Upcoming VoIP peering work in DISPATCH X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:41:23 -0000 Hi, The following message to DISPATCH might be of direct relevance to the work that we do in DRINKS: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg00901.html This is a new proposal about how to do VoIP cross domain "interconnect" - and amazingly it's practically free of the need for any provisioning protocol, which obviously could influence our work in DRINKS quite dramatically. It does depend on the continued existence of the PSTN, though. Recommended reading. Alex From richard@shockey.us Mon Nov 23 12:15:17 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70003A6A4B for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:15:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.335 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvZFNXgexK1G for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-mail-311.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-311.bluehost.com [67.222.54.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 106083A6A1F for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 9573 invoked by uid 0); 23 Nov 2009 20:15:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by outboundproxy6.bluehost.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 20:15:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=shockey.us; h=Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Identified-User; b=mrNYp54NDv8mceNcfQN72Xe7dKYc39ZI7UtaGQ7cwT377wkFTC6yitr8kJdYelVkdWsCFUAotB78bZQD9zXDrzAmItg3dAlKuKV48iB1BFZrCMwF4i66zb8e5yrUv3WQ; Received: from pool-96-241-233-91.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([96.241.233.91] helo=rshockeyPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCfJY-0003WL-Jq; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:15:12 -0700 From: "Richard Shockey" To: "'IETF DRINKS WG'" Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:15:15 -0500 Message-ID: <01ac01ca6c79$abb2b9e0$03182da0$@us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acpseal0LNFcKblTTeG0sIpAfCceQQ== Content-Language: en-us X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 96.241.233.91 authed with richard+shockey.us} Subject: [drinks] The list has been light recently to say the least but we do need to agree on what next steps are going to be.. X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:15:18 -0000 Obviously we did not meet in Hiroshima for business related reasons some of us had. I have reason to believe the AD's are concerned about the lack of progress in the WG. I understand business objectives and staffing changes but we need to come to some agreement on how/if progress can be achieved. Richard Shockey PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 skype/AIM: rshockey101 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101