From bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch  Wed Jan 27 01:53:49 2010
Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53743A6895 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:53:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.032
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.567,  BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhWUyMFMMvkf for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8EF3A6782 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1Na4ay-00049s-SF for enum@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:56 +0100
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: IETF ENUM list <enum@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001271044130.14597@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [Enum] New RFC defining URI Scheme for GSM SMS
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:53:49 -0000

Hi ENUM folks

Recently RFC 5724 "URI Scheme for Global System for Mobile Communications 
(GSM) Short Message Service (SMS)"

   http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5724.txt

has been published. Having a brief look on it I was wondering whether 
there are potential conflicts with the existing Enumservices for SMS as 
defined in RFC 4355

  http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4355.txt

Before I get deeper into this, I'd like to ask the ENUM WG about its 
thoughts on this? Do we need to revise RFC 4355 to contain the RFC 5724 
URI Scheme or isn't there any impact?

cheers,
  Bernie