From nobody Thu Jul 31 07:46:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036771B2919 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cchvk5OMKv1K for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC3F1B28F2 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9F7F806C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E224C19005C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from divertimento.ddns.nominum.com (64.89.225.68) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:46:28 -0700 From: Ted Lemon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:45:30 -0700 To: Message-ID: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [64.89.225.68] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/tX8F32KFDWB2geHItqyhvTgP3bQ Subject: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:46:40 -0000 This documents an RRtype that already has a code point from IANA. = There have been interop problems due to implementations of differing = versions of the specification, so it would be good to get it solid if = there isn't a good reason not to. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-uri/ Thanks! From nobody Thu Jul 31 08:04:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313F21B2934 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o2LMLB7S-d1Y for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F911B28F5 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z60so4245005qgd.27 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WgxQUIHO8HsHSBuDJcI6AcSiVtSfDCV0GuNN2//n6ZU=; b=c5IY3kkbYy/64Inxup+6Os5AD4xXvDpyWQ4Fx/POJCPX/CvNYh0NE+iBDgCCY5/6Iq TTP866WmyXjQQ/vCLSkKVw8HUFYV+gPOzEuH/rd96VoYJSj1TkXqQC1QKk7tg2N4Rumt 8Nfql+f2TlLtLvR9gNai3yo+y6ZPPxU7B2iwp6eJ+iUxCqedy5hGpkXSHtAwYA5xnfzf clcKEVjMuFj1i0hIcKQefWCvhQqfKSYlvdFEIT/fuuaVSyZAiiVWWu/Ag4Prmm9qo7Mb qK98+yv8FXVcObp6RH8NqgZHbHL0YYk4OojYeHp7Q6p44v7dmXVJkBjd5E04Xa0Am0q1 hSJQ== X-Received: by 10.224.30.1 with SMTP id s1mr19855891qac.70.1406819083149; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.116.164.53] (rtp-isp-nat-pool1-1.cisco.com. [64.102.254.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm9922496qaj.42.2014.07.31.08.04.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Ralph Droms X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257) In-Reply-To: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:04:42 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> To: Ted Lemon Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/mp4NE5IHE_rZmKT1fSZJ18g3e44 Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:04:49 -0000 > On Jul 31, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: >=20 > This documents an RRtype that already has a code point from IANA. There h= ave been interop problems due to implementations of differing versions of th= e specification, What do you mean by "the specification"? Previous revs of draft-faults from= -uri? - Ralph > so it would be good to get it solid if there isn't a good reason not to. >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-uri/ >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Thu Jul 31 08:05:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64C41A008D for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqN01SmhVals for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318161A0092 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135311B85CE for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FFB190052; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from divertimento.ddns.nominum.com (64.89.225.68) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:43 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> To: Ralph Droms X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [64.89.225.68] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/QiFfg3txNyyhc4qSG3BrOKK-ujM Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:05:45 -0000 On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > What do you mean by "the specification"? Previous revs of = draft-faults from-uri? Yes. Mark Andrews mentioned this on the DNSOP mailing list this = morning. From nobody Thu Jul 31 09:47:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026A31B2936 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.978 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnwC1KxKV82w for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932AF1A0180 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u57so3027621wes.38 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ud/Jp7B4s53Bzn+hNy6u228mU6VA3sKVlpa4t7LZHH4=; b=URILl+MmFODq4Ilez31/9WwsqE1IqzZUGjZA9EGFUMnK9q6Q5ba5wGEPKrYHkc5kan 3Xel9PbDd/Q+LEA8ewZvGQgsAzk7nQn+WRH+bqcZmuLI5pPzezAO33JIJpFdsXvlfCQ6 66y1Rym/PfwLUoBrUsUnTkMVMGFnNZUs+pb5dWBXgqx5YLgRnkiMaTW/MfnyapRHbdi+ b2xwkvd/T5AKB5Wt/QXSEuS0vPERbi9WMeJLC5SOwdn3Qk5QfNVXFBqWlHKm84wWSBB1 ZhZMVdZ/yqmqm5ectAPh+tXixZ8YsOcpDlkOlf7drSF5SeTDwXuGO30PEBuhcrEJd+Nb 3gZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.133.1 with SMTP id oy1mr18565122wjb.87.1406825244911; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.123.164 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:47:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _jKbCI9h0AkIxcEga3ZhbDewuy0 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= To: Ted Lemon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/8zQN2V1Mab7GQU9-HFLjbLH-f00 Cc: Ralph Droms , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:47:30 -0000 At Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:38 -0700, Ted Lemon wrote: > > What do you mean by "the specification"? Previous revs of draft-faults from-uri? > > Yes. Mark Andrews mentioned this on the DNSOP mailing list this morning. And what would you want from the review? Just reviewing the document in the general sense but mainly focusing on preventing post-publication changes that are backward incompatible? -- JINMEI, Tatuya From nobody Thu Jul 31 09:57:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCB71A02D1 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMO8WNgWZo0k for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6441A00CA for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4FE1B87E9 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816DB190052; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from divertimento.ddns.nominum.com (64.89.225.68) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:08 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <063A80EF-439E-47DC-9415-8F92D667EC7E@nominum.com> References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> To: =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [64.89.225.68] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/CG1379OWvDxfuXQCtyaahmkkWEk Cc: Ralph Droms , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:57:11 -0000 On Jul 31, 2014, at 9:47 AM, =E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89 = wrote: > And what would you want from the review? Just reviewing the document > in the general sense but mainly focusing on preventing > post-publication changes that are backward incompatible? Oh, sorry, what I want is for reviewers' opinions on whether it's okay = to publish as-is or whether it has problems that need to be fixed. From nobody Thu Jul 31 09:58:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8871B294C for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76spJJCsjf_y for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.emailarray.com (smtp.emailarray.com [69.28.212.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D246A1B2942 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 92881 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2014 16:57:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?204.29.149.87?) (Y2RsQGFzZ2FhcmQub3JnQDUwLjc2LjM0LjE4NQ==) (POLARISLOCAL) by smtp2.emailarray.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 Jul 2014 16:57:58 -0000 From: "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" To: "=?utf-8?b?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?=" , ralf.weber@nominum.com Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:56 -0700 Message-ID: <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> In-Reply-To: References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.8r4229) X-PolarisMail-Flags: x Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/2XtKRhU42fIgp1GyV5h_ct0Y118 Cc: "" , Ted Lemon , Ralph Droms Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:58:01 -0000 Greetings, Tatuya, I assume you are volunteering to review? :) If so, I'll put you down for a review of this document. As we like to have two reviewers, I'd also like to ask Ralf to review, if possible. Assume that Tatuya's assumption is correct, unless Ted responds otherwise. Can you two (Tatuya and Ralf) confirm if you can do the review? Ted, when do you need this by? Christopher On 31 Jul 2014, at 9:47, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:05:38 -0700, > Ted Lemon wrote: > >>> What do you mean by "the specification"? Previous revs of >>> draft-faults from-uri? >> >> Yes. Mark Andrews mentioned this on the DNSOP mailing list this >> morning. > > And what would you want from the review? Just reviewing the document > in the general sense but mainly focusing on preventing > post-publication changes that are backward incompatible? > > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya > > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir -- 李柯睿 Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf From nobody Thu Jul 31 10:07:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A951A02E6 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.978 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZx0ZiY0mmed for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C54291A02D1 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x13so3038427wgg.19 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lJ7LEsvE+4gMQ+dmdzUcx4EaAQ22plM4zekcmwmIYDg=; b=BmRbG/iOfap0P6skO49shCcSpyprjYgXTplAzPsUeT/rdbeOpzzdaKB/FdOwhCeHxc YSpKLwQmKCoVvXeW2VftWc0zNm0K3VkzWbkCPdReLum9pWri/P8w3D8H2Ynj3m0OMtBo MZbn2S6k/RbNjLMliKn/fJrey2/u60tUWywMhGkHjx/BRfqdadiW9qomEBXTc0kq/wCO DrLMlicJM3pOXHcZymY8nDX1aLMd42qoF7rH4d21rNYS7aQGVpU2c3f+xEdtki7oLixX zNPVwk1ejf/bu8sXmu1JD0vLPF0hfcD4/g5jQGOREFsT51w6yqSth304ZcX0OszjWpdh +Hjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.133.1 with SMTP id oy1mr18739986wjb.87.1406826473331; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.123.164 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:07:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b09R3v2rB3Q_sUBpN93Wo5avqwo Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/4DeAgQcIecPvBhDnzM27oL0dpr0 Cc: ralf.weber@nominum.com, Ralph Droms , Ted Lemon , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:07:56 -0000 At Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:56 -0700, "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" wrote: > Tatuya, I assume you are volunteering to review? :) If so, I'll put > you down for a review of this document. I'm happy to review it, and I interpret Ted's latest response as I'll need to review as a usual documentation review with a conclusion of "OK/NG to publish" (and a list of issues in case of the latter). -- JINMEI, Tatuya From nobody Thu Jul 31 10:13:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589771A02D1 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3vhS5syFRT4 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE06B1A02E0 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04D21B8804 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A085F19005C; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from divertimento.ddns.nominum.com (64.89.225.68) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:12:59 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:12:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <57BD8B58-5A28-4B54-8A30-32B6C0B481DF@nominum.com> References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [64.89.225.68] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Mfc4RROUm0vHxxX4Ex4wSph9Ooc Cc: ralf.weber@nominum.com, "" , =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= , Ralph Droms Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:13:03 -0000 On Jul 31, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE = wrote: > Ted, when do you need this by? Sooner is always better, but there's no fixed deadline. From nobody Thu Jul 31 13:27:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DFA1A00C2 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:27:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ip5y3-EAyhwU for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.emailarray.com (smtp1.emailarray.com [65.39.216.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976F81A001E for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 42414 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2014 20:27:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.24.10.86?) (Y2RsQGFzZ2FhcmQub3JnQDE5OC4xNDcuMjI2LjY=) (POLARISLOCAL) by smtp1.emailarray.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 31 Jul 2014 20:27:35 -0000 From: "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" To: "=?utf-8?b?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?=" Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:27:31 -0700 Message-ID: <6A3222D7-564D-45A1-A9B2-7DAD5A7D4897@asgaard.org> In-Reply-To: References: <076231CF-0D5E-43C9-9B19-E579C14A1020@nominum.com> <25E8B6E7-3751-4A16-82A3-08B10591C076@gmail.com> <56265EDF-82D0-4174-A483-4990AFD3DB66@asgaard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.8r4229) X-PolarisMail-Flags: x Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/PMX016-UeBt9R3-_xiMkDFHcTMw Cc: ralf.weber@nominum.com, Ralph Droms , Ted Lemon , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Could I get a few DNS experts to review draft-faltstrom-uri? X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:27:38 -0000 On 31 Jul 2014, at 10:07, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:57:56 -0700, > "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" wrote: > >> Tatuya, I assume you are volunteering to review? :) If so, I'll >> put >> you down for a review of this document. > > I'm happy to review it, and I interpret Ted's latest response as I'll > need to review as a usual documentation review with a conclusion of > "OK/NG to publish" (and a list of issues in case of the latter). > > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya Thank's Tatuya! You are correct in your assumption. There is no drop-dead date, but Ted would prefer it sooner, rather than later. Christopher -- 李柯睿 Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf