From nobody Mon Dec 1 19:09:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11621A0092 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:09:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2gzPqbpw7YH for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:09:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCAB1A006E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:09:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E84DA0112 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 03:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018B53E072 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (72.182.60.179) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:09:19 -0800 From: Ted Lemon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:09:09 -0600 To: "" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [72.182.60.179] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/k6YfLPuZSGE7gours-avAv7GCvE Subject: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 03:09:56 -0000 It would be nice to get a DHCPv6 expert to review this document. Would = the Directorate Coordinator please solicit a volunteer to do this? = What I'm looking for is someone to make sure the bits are done right, = and that this doesn't have any operational holes relating to the = specific functioning of the DHCPv6 protocol that the opsec folks might = have missed. Thanks! P.S. Directorate participants, please don't undertake the review before = being asked by the Directorate Coordinator. From nobody Mon Dec 1 19:15:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4C21A00A3 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:15:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBe3WjTyUHgz for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED3F1A006E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPL61091; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 03:15:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 03:15:20 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.72]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:15:16 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: Ted Lemon , "" Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd3ixYbs+jOmlEuX/tk4W4uIS5x7oAYA Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 03:15:15 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/gGk3eqRzoDtWFnD-s4DpGbvP5cc Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 03:15:25 -0000 SGksIFRlZCwNCg0KSSBjYW4gcmV2aWV3IGl0LiBXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBkdWUgdGltZT8gSG9wZSBp dCBpcyBub3QgdG9vIHVyZ2VudC4NCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KDQpTaGVuZw0KDQo+LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5h bCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj5Gcm9tOiBJbnQtZGlyIFttYWlsdG86aW50LWRpci1ib3VuY2VzQGll dGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgVGVkIExlbW9uDQo+U2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIg MDIsIDIwMTQgMTE6MDkgQU0NCj5UbzogPGludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+U3ViamVjdDogW0lu dC1kaXJdIERIQ1B2NiBleHBlcnQgcmV2aWV3IG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3BzZWMtZGhjcHY2LXNo aWVsZA0KPg0KPkl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIG5pY2UgdG8gZ2V0IGEgREhDUHY2IGV4cGVydCB0byByZXZp ZXcgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudC4gICBXb3VsZA0KPnRoZSBEaXJlY3RvcmF0ZSBDb29yZGluYXRvciBw bGVhc2Ugc29saWNpdCBhIHZvbHVudGVlciB0byBkbyB0aGlzPyAgIFdoYXQgSSdtDQo+bG9va2lu ZyBmb3IgaXMgc29tZW9uZSB0byBtYWtlIHN1cmUgdGhlIGJpdHMgYXJlIGRvbmUgcmlnaHQsIGFu ZCB0aGF0IHRoaXMNCj5kb2Vzbid0IGhhdmUgYW55IG9wZXJhdGlvbmFsIGhvbGVzIHJlbGF0aW5n IHRvIHRoZSBzcGVjaWZpYyBmdW5jdGlvbmluZyBvZiB0aGUNCj5ESENQdjYgcHJvdG9jb2wgdGhh dCB0aGUgb3BzZWMgZm9sa3MgbWlnaHQgaGF2ZSBtaXNzZWQuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmtzIQ0KPg0KPlAu Uy4gRGlyZWN0b3JhdGUgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzLCBwbGVhc2UgZG9uJ3QgdW5kZXJ0YWtlIHRoZSBy ZXZpZXcgYmVmb3JlIGJlaW5nDQo+YXNrZWQgYnkgdGhlIERpcmVjdG9yYXRlIENvb3JkaW5hdG9y Lg0KPg0KPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ SW50LWRpciBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj5JbnQtZGlyQGlldGYub3JnDQo+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pbnQtZGlyDQo= From nobody Tue Dec 2 07:37:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769191A1BEE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:37:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuUCgrtNCgBl for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B821A1BDD for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z107so9511561qgd.15 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:37:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=RhNLqzIt+a55s9sXlPHPReKiFC/GhDSp8OIoIUG58RE=; b=HQ2dIVIOhDrVoxzvf3ZvCIfLUox4sA2REfKAI4x272BERmlORQ8Ukv21VH/3i/7EGz Fd/cN7i0txAg96jBiXkgj2jIySbFn9pWVaXe8UoG896fCZm7Tz64/i/vg8GvQMcHlKk9 JUMaIG5q8fVbFemJUXAiDEqgLBr0DDDZ+Tc2ZDs4Ir2/FuLKong+kX6BWzDLglpulijH +38JeFSOLd7FWaZRzz5wHlkRX/wZ48uUA2ghRI0Jx0Aex9RSkRB/UKV/wkQaRMyS8W3/ 9gZQuaDFzaYIP3rqiTFD4CCr2DBf5rO3mQieure/mGHWq3SlLMJsaeAAttdcfd3nWlId f20A== X-Received: by 10.140.101.112 with SMTP id t103mr20152228qge.92.1417534656110; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.86.252.186] (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 91sm7617036qgy.15.2014.12.02.07.37.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:37:35 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ralph Droms In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:37:16 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <968CC3CA-CECB-4E11-9AE5-059F4FDA7344@gmail.com> References: To: "" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/K1zZYVZBkH2NxzIV5Z_sVewg-gU Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:37:38 -0000 Directorate Coordinator - I'd be willing to review this doc. - Ralph PS Who is the Directorate Coordinator, anyway? On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:09 PM 12/1/14, Ted Lemon = wrote: > It would be nice to get a DHCPv6 expert to review this document. = Would the Directorate Coordinator please solicit a volunteer to do this? = What I'm looking for is someone to make sure the bits are done right, = and that this doesn't have any operational holes relating to the = specific functioning of the DHCPv6 protocol that the opsec folks might = have missed. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > P.S. Directorate participants, please don't undertake the review = before being asked by the Directorate Coordinator. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Tue Dec 2 22:22:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324881A00B6 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:22:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nm2ssr4FCZDi for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594881A00B5 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:22:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1398; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1417587771; x=1418797371; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8xNR9dTqTfyzo42g42SwIjaoYeKjSLYajblptGSGrB8=; b=LYRDt0a2LfFZlgMhypduWTdTJe1cB8LfgpDtdVPKnNnof5Vw/ABLNrhk h/6HOsJu0QEAawA1wL9LJu0HL6SnoulaXNDNZT85RQAzTVuAO3Aarmkv4 zEDhe16DytBCJihdXeO24N3nlIf7hAy3PUhx8CYch1lzF9d/w5PE08MGa g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAMarflStJA2J/2dsb2JhbABbgwdSWccPCoYfAoETFgEBAQEBfYQCAQEBAwEBAQE3MQMLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQEeCQcnCxQJCAIEDgWINwkN1g0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBJA8MwcGgyOBHwWQYYslgSyDOJA9g3tvgkcBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,506,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="374004011" Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Dec 2014 06:22:49 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB36MnKC019225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 06:22:49 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.11]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:22:49 -0600 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: Sheng Jiang Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd11FrSOieBmZkStyQ9PwJZdv5x8BTyAgAFiJ9s= Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 06:22:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/SFmqJH3a3UBsw4YkrqtzsHzDUpk Cc: Ted Lemon , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 06:22:53 -0000 Hi Ralph ... Great if you and Sheng can review. Thanks. - Bernie (from iPad) > On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:15 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote: >=20 > Hi, Ted, >=20 > I can review it. What is the due time? Hope it is not too urgent. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Sheng >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Int-dir [mailto:int-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon >> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:09 AM >> To: >> Subject: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shiel= d >>=20 >> It would be nice to get a DHCPv6 expert to review this document. Would >> the Directorate Coordinator please solicit a volunteer to do this? Wha= t I'm >> looking for is someone to make sure the bits are done right, and that th= is >> doesn't have any operational holes relating to the specific functioning = of the >> DHCPv6 protocol that the opsec folks might have missed. >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >> P.S. Directorate participants, please don't undertake the review before = being >> asked by the Directorate Coordinator. >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-dir mailing list >> Int-dir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Wed Dec 3 17:31:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AA61A8780 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 17:28:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5HEGHI5UnwKU for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 17:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5061A6FCF for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 17:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPN80535; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 01:28:50 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.72]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:28:42 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd3ixYbs+jOmlEuX/tk4W4uIS5x7oAYAgAFBPwCAAcWxAA== Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 01:28:42 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/OL-WArVy01kio0DRodR0O9hN98E Cc: Ted Lemon , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:29:00 -0000 SGksIEJlcm5pZSwNCg0KRG9lcyB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIG1lYW4geW91IGhhdmUgYXNrZWQgUmFscGgg YW5kIEkgdG8gcmV2aWV3IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYXMgdGhlIERpcmVjdG9yYXRlIENvb3JkaW5h dG9yPyBXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBkdWUgdGltZSwgdGhlbj8NCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KDQpTaGVuZw0KDQo+ LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj5Gcm9tOiBCZXJuaWUgVm9seiAodm9seikgW21h aWx0bzp2b2x6QGNpc2NvLmNvbV0NCj5TZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIERlY2VtYmVyIDAzLCAyMDE0 IDI6MjMgUE0NCj5UbzogU2hlbmcgSmlhbmcNCj5DYzogVGVkIExlbW9uOyA8aW50LWRpckBpZXRm Lm9yZz4NCj5TdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW0ludC1kaXJdIERIQ1B2NiBleHBlcnQgcmV2aWV3IG9mIGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtb3BzZWMtZGhjcHY2LXNoaWVsZA0KPg0KPkhpIFJhbHBoIC4uLiBHcmVhdCBpZiB5 b3UgYW5kIFNoZW5nIGNhbiByZXZpZXcuIFRoYW5rcy4NCj4NCj4tIEJlcm5pZSAoZnJvbSBpUGFk KQ0KPg0KPj4gT24gRGVjIDEsIDIwMTQsIGF0IDEwOjE1IFBNLCBTaGVuZyBKaWFuZyA8amlhbmdz aGVuZ0BodWF3ZWkuY29tPg0KPndyb3RlOg0KPj4NCj4+IEhpLCBUZWQsDQo+Pg0KPj4gSSBjYW4g cmV2aWV3IGl0LiBXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBkdWUgdGltZT8gSG9wZSBpdCBpcyBub3QgdG9vIHVyZ2Vu dC4NCj4+DQo+PiBDaGVlcnMsDQo+Pg0KPj4gU2hlbmcNCj4+DQo+Pj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4+PiBGcm9tOiBJbnQtZGlyIFttYWlsdG86aW50LWRpci1ib3VuY2VzQGll dGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgVGVkIExlbW9uDQo+Pj4gU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgRGVjZW1i ZXIgMDIsIDIwMTQgMTE6MDkgQU0NCj4+PiBUbzogPGludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+Pj4gU3Vi amVjdDogW0ludC1kaXJdIERIQ1B2NiBleHBlcnQgcmV2aWV3IG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3BzZWMt ZGhjcHY2LXNoaWVsZA0KPj4+DQo+Pj4gSXQgd291bGQgYmUgbmljZSB0byBnZXQgYSBESENQdjYg ZXhwZXJ0IHRvIHJldmlldyB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KPldvdWxkDQo+Pj4gdGhlIERpcmVjdG9y YXRlIENvb3JkaW5hdG9yIHBsZWFzZSBzb2xpY2l0IGEgdm9sdW50ZWVyIHRvIGRvIHRoaXM/ICAg V2hhdA0KPkknbQ0KPj4+IGxvb2tpbmcgZm9yIGlzIHNvbWVvbmUgdG8gbWFrZSBzdXJlIHRoZSBi aXRzIGFyZSBkb25lIHJpZ2h0LCBhbmQgdGhhdCB0aGlzDQo+Pj4gZG9lc24ndCBoYXZlIGFueSBv cGVyYXRpb25hbCBob2xlcyByZWxhdGluZyB0byB0aGUgc3BlY2lmaWMgZnVuY3Rpb25pbmcgb2YN Cj50aGUNCj4+PiBESENQdjYgcHJvdG9jb2wgdGhhdCB0aGUgb3BzZWMgZm9sa3MgbWlnaHQgaGF2 ZSBtaXNzZWQuDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBUaGFua3MhDQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBQLlMuIERpcmVjdG9yYXRlIHBh cnRpY2lwYW50cywgcGxlYXNlIGRvbid0IHVuZGVydGFrZSB0aGUgcmV2aWV3IGJlZm9yZQ0KPmJl aW5nDQo+Pj4gYXNrZWQgYnkgdGhlIERpcmVjdG9yYXRlIENvb3JkaW5hdG9yLg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4g X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+PiBJbnQt ZGlyIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj4+IEludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+PiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5p ZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ludC1kaXINCj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+PiBJbnQtZGlyIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj4g SW50LWRpckBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m by9pbnQtZGlyDQo= From nobody Wed Dec 3 18:55:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D659D1A6F44 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:52:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNSSXiHB2ok6 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:52:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A00F1A6FEC for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:52:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2358; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1417661565; x=1418871165; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=NbmRLyph/OD/jsuzHda8ng25SzZnj6J8oxCrg+oLlEQ=; b=PXG3TJWz/dqLIJzMMQb7akinwC77jbDaaEhd5YFFgXVvWnSFj/nNiM+j r43PyZ1DDkNmz7mtpgwNlDlDwbh0DuZEDJbElS2Af0jl7dnNSOG3sT6e/ mX238DnPZhCH7ZsHAUvd8ineHR2yFOC5TR3EEpn8DQn+SRDSbywaF0fVJ c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAC3Lf1StJA2E/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWMZaCoYXAoEWFgEBAQEBfYQCAQEBAwEBAQE3MQMLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQEdAQkHJwsUCQgCBA4FiDUJDdZCAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF5AEEQEdMwcGgx6BHgWQD4QWhjSBIjiCdY9Hg3hvgQyBOQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,512,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="102434208" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2014 02:52:37 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sB42qamI005111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 02:52:36 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.11]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 20:52:35 -0600 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: Sheng Jiang Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd11FrSOieBmZkStyQ9PwJZdv5x8BTyAgAFiJ9uAAaS9AP//stt+ Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 02:52:35 +0000 Message-ID: <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/0GGHxC7fr736oADmZ6frUt00uGo Cc: Ted Lemon , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 02:52:48 -0000 Yes, please review. I do not have any more info than was in Ted's email. I = guess for now, let's assume by Dec 12. If Ted needs it earlier, he will nee= d to let you know. Datatracker status is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-d= hcpv6-shield/. - Bernie (from iPad) > On Dec 3, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote: >=20 > Hi, Bernie, >=20 > Does this email mean you have asked Ralph and I to review this document a= s the Directorate Coordinator? What is the due time, then? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Sheng >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bernie Volz (volz) [mailto:volz@cisco.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:23 PM >> To: Sheng Jiang >> Cc: Ted Lemon; >> Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-s= hield >>=20 >> Hi Ralph ... Great if you and Sheng can review. Thanks. >>=20 >> - Bernie (from iPad) >>=20 >>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:15 PM, Sheng Jiang >> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi, Ted, >>>=20 >>> I can review it. What is the due time? Hope it is not too urgent. >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>>=20 >>> Sheng >>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Int-dir [mailto:int-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:09 AM >>>> To: >>>> Subject: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shi= eld >>>>=20 >>>> It would be nice to get a DHCPv6 expert to review this document. >> Would >>>> the Directorate Coordinator please solicit a volunteer to do this? W= hat >> I'm >>>> looking for is someone to make sure the bits are done right, and that = this >>>> doesn't have any operational holes relating to the specific functionin= g of >> the >>>> DHCPv6 protocol that the opsec folks might have missed. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks! >>>>=20 >>>> P.S. Directorate participants, please don't undertake the review befor= e >> being >>>> asked by the Directorate Coordinator. >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Int-dir mailing list >>>> Int-dir@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Int-dir mailing list >>> Int-dir@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Thu Dec 4 09:39:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4F41A0393 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:39:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNNE2wO6gMi3 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE8691A6EE7 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27482DA012F for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E9653E076; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:39:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:39:13 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:38:57 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> To: Bernie Volz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/goo7Gll8av-fbnAdSCLU-JApUYY Cc: "" , Sheng Jiang Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:39:44 -0000 On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > Yes, please review. I do not have any more info than was in Ted's = email. I guess for now, let's assume by Dec 12. If Ted needs it earlier, = he will need to let you know. When I ask for a review, my general assumption is that people will = volunteer to do it if they have time, and that the response will come = back "soon." I don't have a specific deadline for this document, but = anything beyond Dec. 12 is probably too long just because it will fall = off the radar. If someone can review it, but can't get it done before = Dec. 12., I can live with that as long as they do it. Of course, I'm planning to go on vacation the following Monday, so if it = comes out on Dec. 12 I may not actually benefit from the review until = January 5. From nobody Thu Dec 4 09:44:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060EA1A877F for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:44:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fXurV7Rz0nt for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A8F1A3BA0 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id g10so18127087pdj.37 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:44:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=28gtC4/I+c7uY9qBrEfGs6sB8hpI+ZYbq7mt9m9kH4Q=; b=WFjn15XDXpKz0FESggrjr5Dr6bRKoBae3YA5rrvekVc9RF8tDqYI9iuT7zSCm7hUL3 XMMuCc00r5FqpdkIImrXDvfVHAusk0fpNdP87GjPr96iG9aD5mFP4BdnKCQwONSozFNJ Wah/++TmSdspqFLEUZB3JtioTAa9Nj6kS+pp//DCd3x4F3jWDUV5UytbDLP37VHQUI3z DP2bASyn3GjQyPjZhRK0u/7LLpZbzOqR/uNHZQhJaY5RBVZ9oTuytcCxItDxyry9RLXQ n66p6wp5BaJYbS+eo1s2XIQm70JrGadoxndKKajqoJWPGgcydJ/XSxdnmyIcVHMS7bVv egyg== X-Received: by 10.66.154.10 with SMTP id vk10mr20477357pab.26.1417715040517; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:44:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.154.180.46] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com. [128.107.239.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f12sm26630138pdm.90.2014.12.04.09.43.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:43:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ralph Droms In-Reply-To: <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:43:59 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <63ABA32B-DD1C-4864-B2F2-A92287B82BC9@gmail.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> To: Ted Lemon , "Bernie Volz (volz)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/My6o54x3rnqn1kpgMaifcarFCv4 Cc: Sheng Jiang , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:44:03 -0000 OK. I'm in SJ, returning home tomorrow. I have the review on my list = of "stuff to keep me occupied" on the flight home. - Ralph On Dec 4, 2014, at 9:38 AM 12/4/14, Ted Lemon = wrote: > On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: >> Yes, please review. I do not have any more info than was in Ted's = email. I guess for now, let's assume by Dec 12. If Ted needs it earlier, = he will need to let you know. >=20 > When I ask for a review, my general assumption is that people will = volunteer to do it if they have time, and that the response will come = back "soon." I don't have a specific deadline for this document, but = anything beyond Dec. 12 is probably too long just because it will fall = off the radar. If someone can review it, but can't get it done before = Dec. 12., I can live with that as long as they do it. >=20 > Of course, I'm planning to go on vacation the following Monday, so if = it comes out on Dec. 12 I may not actually benefit from the review until = January 5. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Thu Dec 4 09:46:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C648B1A889F for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:46:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuXgDlFUvIfL for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBEA01A1BBB for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903E0DA012F for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE7453E076; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:45:29 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Ted Lemon In-Reply-To: <63ABA32B-DD1C-4864-B2F2-A92287B82BC9@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:45:13 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <5611329F-AA5D-42A6-A234-D87146FCF3EF@nominum.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> <63ABA32B-DD1C-4864-B2F2-A92287B82BC9@gmail.com> To: Ralph Droms X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/CW-b3ssfhCLLsJ3e-GGrAE7MCMc Cc: Sheng Jiang , Bernie Volz , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:46:00 -0000 On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Ralph Droms wrote: > OK. I'm in SJ, returning home tomorrow. I have the review on my list = of "stuff to keep me occupied" on the flight home. Thanks! From nobody Thu Dec 4 13:59:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7891B1A6FD1 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:59:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.567 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_D7aJegX7wL for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:59:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.emailarray.com (smtp.emailarray.com [69.28.212.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75AD1A6F0A for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:59:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 95322 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2014 21:58:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.24.10.65?) (Y2RsQGFzZ2FhcmQub3JnQDE5OC4xNDcuMjI2LjY=) (POLARISLOCAL) by smtp2.emailarray.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 4 Dec 2014 21:58:58 -0000 From: "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" To: "Ralph Droms" Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:58:54 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <63ABA32B-DD1C-4864-B2F2-A92287B82BC9@gmail.com> References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> <63ABA32B-DD1C-4864-B2F2-A92287B82BC9@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.8r4576) X-PolarisMail-Flags: x Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/VmEI5EioRL4-9SNeGjReWTUmqQI Cc: Sheng Jiang , "" , Ted Lemon , "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:59:02 -0000 On 4 Dec 2014, at 9:43, Ralph Droms wrote: > OK. I'm in SJ, returning home tomorrow. I have the review on my list > of "stuff to keep me occupied" on the flight home. Thank's Ralph. Christopher > > - Ralph > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 9:38 AM 12/4/14, Ted Lemon > wrote: > >> On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) >> wrote: >>> Yes, please review. I do not have any more info than was in Ted's >>> email. I guess for now, let's assume by Dec 12. If Ted needs it >>> earlier, he will need to let you know. >> >> When I ask for a review, my general assumption is that people will >> volunteer to do it if they have time, and that the response will come >> back "soon." I don't have a specific deadline for this document, >> but anything beyond Dec. 12 is probably too long just because it will >> fall off the radar. If someone can review it, but can't get it done >> before Dec. 12., I can live with that as long as they do it. >> >> Of course, I'm planning to go on vacation the following Monday, so if >> it comes out on Dec. 12 I may not actually benefit from the review >> until January 5. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-dir mailing list >> Int-dir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir > > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir -- 李柯睿 Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf From nobody Thu Dec 4 16:56:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26E1A89A4 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:56:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBEGVw6e0wg0 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:56:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3271A8896 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:56:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPO96802; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:56:32 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.72]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 08:56:28 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: Ted Lemon , Bernie Volz Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd3ixYbs+jOmlEuX/tk4W4uIS5x7oAYAgAFBPwCAAcWxAP//keiAgAD3poCAAP8gQA== Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:56:26 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB5C92@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> In-Reply-To: <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/mP2IX-XELhov99zOYh0GNI3T1n4 Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:56:38 -0000 TXkgb3JpZ2luYWwgcGxhbiB3YXMgdG8gcmV2aWV3IGl0IG5leHQgV2VkbmVzZGF5IChEZWMuIDEw dGgpLiBCdXQgb25lIG9mIG15IGNvbGxlYWd1ZXMgd2hvIHN1cHBvc2VzIHRvIGhhdmUgYSBoYWxm LWRheSBtZWV0aW5nIHdpdGggbWUgdG9kYXkgaGFzIGp1c3Qgbm90aWZpZWQgbWUgdGhhdCBoZSBj YW5ub3QgbWFrZSBpdCBkdWUgdG8gYW4gdXJnZW50IGZhbWlseSBpc3N1ZS4gU28sIEkgY2FuIHJl dmlldyBpdCB0b2RheS4gRXZlbiBJIGNhbm5vdCBmaW5pc2ggaXQgdG9kYXksIG15IHJldmlldyBj YW4gYmUgZXhwZWN0ZWQgYmVmb3JlIERlYy4gOHRoLCBVUyBXZXN0ZXJuIHRpbWUuDQoNClJlZ2Fy ZHMsDQoNClNoZW5nDQoNCj4tLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPkZyb206IFRlZCBM ZW1vbiBbbWFpbHRvOlRlZC5MZW1vbkBub21pbnVtLmNvbV0NCj5TZW50OiBGcmlkYXksIERlY2Vt YmVyIDA1LCAyMDE0IDE6MzkgQU0NCj5UbzogQmVybmllIFZvbHoNCj5DYzogU2hlbmcgSmlhbmc7 IDxpbnQtZGlyQGlldGYub3JnPg0KPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbSW50LWRpcl0gREhDUHY2IGV4cGVy dCByZXZpZXcgb2YgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vcHNlYy1kaGNwdjYtc2hpZWxkDQo+DQo+T24gRGVjIDMs IDIwMTQsIGF0IDk6NTIgUE0sIEJlcm5pZSBWb2x6ICh2b2x6KSA8dm9sekBjaXNjby5jb20+IHdy b3RlOg0KPj4gWWVzLCBwbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3LiBJIGRvIG5vdCBoYXZlIGFueSBtb3JlIGluZm8g dGhhbiB3YXMgaW4gVGVkJ3MgZW1haWwuIEkNCj5ndWVzcyBmb3Igbm93LCBsZXQncyBhc3N1bWUg YnkgRGVjIDEyLiBJZiBUZWQgbmVlZHMgaXQgZWFybGllciwgaGUgd2lsbCBuZWVkIHRvDQo+bGV0 IHlvdSBrbm93Lg0KPg0KPldoZW4gSSBhc2sgZm9yIGEgcmV2aWV3LCBteSBnZW5lcmFsIGFzc3Vt cHRpb24gaXMgdGhhdCBwZW9wbGUgd2lsbCB2b2x1bnRlZXINCj50byBkbyBpdCBpZiB0aGV5IGhh dmUgdGltZSwgYW5kIHRoYXQgdGhlIHJlc3BvbnNlIHdpbGwgY29tZSBiYWNrICJzb29uLiIgICBJ DQo+ZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBhIHNwZWNpZmljIGRlYWRsaW5lIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50LCBidXQg YW55dGhpbmcgYmV5b25kIERlYy4gMTINCj5pcyBwcm9iYWJseSB0b28gbG9uZyBqdXN0IGJlY2F1 c2UgaXQgd2lsbCBmYWxsIG9mZiB0aGUgcmFkYXIuICAgSWYgc29tZW9uZSBjYW4NCj5yZXZpZXcg aXQsIGJ1dCBjYW4ndCBnZXQgaXQgZG9uZSBiZWZvcmUgRGVjLiAxMi4sIEkgY2FuIGxpdmUgd2l0 aCB0aGF0IGFzIGxvbmcgYXMNCj50aGV5IGRvIGl0Lg0KPg0KPk9mIGNvdXJzZSwgSSdtIHBsYW5u aW5nIHRvIGdvIG9uIHZhY2F0aW9uIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgTW9uZGF5LCBzbyBpZiBpdA0KPmNv bWVzIG91dCBvbiBEZWMuIDEyIEkgbWF5IG5vdCBhY3R1YWxseSBiZW5lZml0IGZyb20gdGhlIHJl dmlldyB1bnRpbCBKYW51YXJ5DQo+NS4NCg0K From nobody Sun Dec 7 18:12:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8EB1A1B40 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:12:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-8KC6Y45hDs for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:12:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BADF1A0030 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BPT65788; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 02:12:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:12:19 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.128]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:12:16 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: Ted Lemon , Bernie Volz Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Thread-Index: AQHQDd3ixYbs+jOmlEuX/tk4W4uIS5x7oAYAgAFBPwCAAcWxAP//keiAgAD3poCAAP8gQIAAim3A Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:12:16 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFDB41A@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB234E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> , <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB52B7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0E09DFBD-5A0E-421A-AC05-BF5848919435@cisco.com> <867BE68B-EA3E-4717-AFFC-401E546FD25B@nominum.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB5C92@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFB5C92@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/ODE8xNCWRQ7g32HgnZj7rRo4h4w Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 02:12:24 -0000 SGksDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSByZXZpZXdlZCBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9wc2VjLWRoY3B2Ni1zaGllbGQgYXMg YW4gYXNzaWduZWQgcmV2aWV3ZXIgYnkgdGhlIEludGVybmV0IEFyZWEgZGlyZWN0b3JhdGUuIEJl bG93IGlzIG15IHJldmlldyBjb21tZW50czoNCg0KT3ZlcmFsbCwgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwcm9w b3NlcyBhbiB1c2VmdWwgbWVjaGFuaXNtIHRvIHByb3RlY3RpbmcgaG9zdHMgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRv IGEgc3dpdGNoZWQgbmV0d29yayBhZ2FpbnN0IHJvZ3VlIERIQ1B2NiBzZXJ2ZXJzLiBUaGUgcHJv cG9zZWQgbWVjaGFuaXNtIGFuZCB0ZXh0IGFyZSBtYXR1cmUuIEhvd2V2ZXIsIEkgaGF2ZSBvbmUg bWFqb3IgYW5kIHNldmVyYWwgbWlub3IgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGNvbW1lbnRzOg0KDQpNYWpvciB0ZWNo bmljYWwgY29tbWVudHM6DQoNCkluIHNlY3Rpb24gNSwgcnVsZSAzLCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgcHJv cG9zZTogIldoZW4gcGFyc2luZyB0aGUgSVB2NiBoZWFkZXIgY2hhaW4sIGlmIC4uLiB0aGUgcGFj a2V0IGNvbnRhaW5zIGFuIHVucmVjb2duaXplZCBOZXh0IEhlYWRlciB2YWx1ZSwgREhDUHY2LVNo aWVsZCBNVVNUIGRyb3AgdGhlIHBhY2tldCIuIFRoaXMgZGVmYXVsdCBiZWhhdmlvciBpcyBhZ2Fp bnN0IFJGQzcwNDUsIHdoaWNoIGhhcyAiSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIGZvcndhcmRpbmcgbm9kZXMgU0hP VUxEIE5PVCBkaXNjYXJkIHBhY2tldHMgY29udGFpbmluZyB1bnJlY29nbmlzZWQgZXh0ZW5zaW9u IGhlYWRlcnMuIiBBbHRob3VnaCBSRkM3MDQ1IGRvZXMgYWxsb3cgImRlZmF1bHQgY29uZmlndXJh dGlvbiBNQVkgZHJvcCBzdWNoIHBhY2tldHMiLCBJIGRvIG5vdCBzZWUgYSBuZWNlc3NhcnkgcmVh c29uIHdoeSB3ZSBkcm9wIHN1Y2ggcGFja2V0IGhlcmUuIFRoaXMgc2VlbSBub3QgcmVsZXZhbnQg dG8gcm9ndWUgREhDUHY2IG1lc3NhZ2UgYXQgYWxsLg0KDQpNaW5vciBjb21tZW50czoNCg0KYSkg REhDUCBzbm9vcGluZyBoYXMgYmVlbiB1bmRlcnN0b29kIHdpZGVseS4gV2h5IG5vdCBjb250aW51 ZSB1c2UgdGhlIHNpbWlsYXIgbmFtZSwgREhDUHY2IHNub29waW5nPyBBIG5ldyBuYW1lICJESENQ djYgc2hpZWxkIiBtYXkgaW1wbHkgdGhlIG1lY2hhbmlzbSBpcyBkaWZmZXJlbnQuDQoNCmIpIElu IHNlY3Rpb24gNSwgcnVsZSAxLCByYXRpb25hbGUgcGFydC4gRG9lcyBhbiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlv biB0aGF0IGluc3BlY3QgSVB2NiBoZWFkZXJzIG9mdGVuIGVuZm9yY2UgYSBsaW1pdCBvbiB0aGUg bnVtYmVyIG9mIGJ5dGVzPyBJIHBlcnNvbmFsbHkgZG91YnQgYW55IGltcGxlbWVudG9ycyB3b3Vs ZCBkbyBzby4gV2h5IG9uZSB3aWxsIGV2ZW4gZG8gdGhpcz8gU28sIGFsdGhvdWdoIEkgYWdyZWUg dGhlIHRlY2huaWNhbCBwb2ludCBoZXJlLCBJIGZhaWwgdG8gdW5kZXJzdGFuZCB0aGUgbmVjZXNz aXR5IGZvciBpdC4NCg0KYykgUnVsZSAyIHNlY3Rpb24gNS4gQWdhaW4sIHRoaXMgcnVsZSBpcyB0 ZWNobmljYWxseSByaWdodCwgYnV0IG5vdCByZWFsbHkgcmVsZXZhbnQgdG8gcm9ndWUgREhDUHY2 IG1lc3NhZ2VzLiBUaGVyZWZvcmUsIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhlICJNVVNUIiBpcyB0b28gc3Ryb25nIGhl cmUuDQoNCmQpIFRoZSB0aGlyZCBsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvZiBzZWN0aW9uIDUsIHRoaXMgc2Vj dGlvbiBzZWVtcyBhbGwgcmVsZXZhbnQgdG8gcnVsZSAyLiBUaGUgYmV0dGVyIHBsYWNlIGlzIHdp dGhpbiB0aGUgcmVsYXRpb24gb2YgcnVsZSAyIG9yIGEgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBwYXJ0IG9mIHJ1bGUg Mi4NCg0KZSkgVGhlIHNlY29uZCBsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvZiBzZWN0aW9uIDUsICJpZiB0aGUg REhDUHY2LVNoaWVsZCBkZXZpY2UgZmFpbHMgdG8gaWRlbnRpZnkgdGhlIHVwcGVyLWxheWVyIHBy b3RvY29sIGFzIGEgcmVzdWx0IG9mIHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgZnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiIuIFRoaXMgbWF5 IGJlIGRvd24gdG8gaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24sIGJ1dCBpdCBpcyBzdGlsbCB1bmNsZWFyIGhlcmU6 IGhvdyBhIERIQ1B2NiBkZXZpY2UgZGVjaWRlcyBmcmFnbWVudGVkIHBhY2tldHMgKG5vdCB0aGUg Zmlyc3QgZnJhZ21lbnRlZCBwYWNrZXQpIGlzIGlkZW50aWZ5IHRoZSB1cHBlci1sYXllciBwcm90 b2NvbCBhcyBhIHJlc3VsdCBvZiB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIGZyYWdtZW50YXRpb24gYW5kIGhvdyBpdCBt YXkgYmUgZmFpbGVkLg0KDQpmKSBUaGUgZmlyc3QgcGFyYWdyYXBoIG9mIHNlY3Rpb24gNy4gVGhp cyBwYXJhZ3JhcGggZGVzY3JpYmUgdGhlIHNjb3BlIG9mIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuIEl0IHNob3Vs ZCBiZWxvbmcgdG8gaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uIHNlY3Rpb24gcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gc2VjdXJpdHkgY29u c2lkZXJhdGlvbi4NCg0KZykgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkb2VzIG5vdCBtZW50aW9uIFNlY3VyZSBE SENQdjYgYXQgYWxsLiBJdCBpcyByZWxldmFudCwgSSBiZWxpZXZlLg0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMs DQoNClNoZW5nDQoNCj4tLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPkZyb206IEludC1kaXIg W21haWx0bzppbnQtZGlyLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBTaGVuZyBKaWFu Zw0KPlNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMDUsIDIwMTQgODo1NiBBTQ0KPlRvOiBUZWQgTGVt b247IEJlcm5pZSBWb2x6DQo+Q2M6IDxpbnQtZGlyQGlldGYub3JnPg0KPlN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBb SW50LWRpcl0gREhDUHY2IGV4cGVydCByZXZpZXcgb2YgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vcHNlYy1kaGNwdjYt c2hpZWxkDQo+DQo+TXkgb3JpZ2luYWwgcGxhbiB3YXMgdG8gcmV2aWV3IGl0IG5leHQgV2VkbmVz ZGF5IChEZWMuIDEwdGgpLiBCdXQgb25lIG9mIG15DQo+Y29sbGVhZ3VlcyB3aG8gc3VwcG9zZXMg dG8gaGF2ZSBhIGhhbGYtZGF5IG1lZXRpbmcgd2l0aCBtZSB0b2RheSBoYXMganVzdA0KPm5vdGlm aWVkIG1lIHRoYXQgaGUgY2Fubm90IG1ha2UgaXQgZHVlIHRvIGFuIHVyZ2VudCBmYW1pbHkgaXNz dWUuIFNvLCBJIGNhbg0KPnJldmlldyBpdCB0b2RheS4gRXZlbiBJIGNhbm5vdCBmaW5pc2ggaXQg dG9kYXksIG15IHJldmlldyBjYW4gYmUgZXhwZWN0ZWQNCj5iZWZvcmUgRGVjLiA4dGgsIFVTIFdl c3Rlcm4gdGltZS4NCj4NCj5SZWdhcmRzLA0KPg0KPlNoZW5nDQo+DQo+Pi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwg TWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+PkZyb206IFRlZCBMZW1vbiBbbWFpbHRvOlRlZC5MZW1vbkBub21pbnVt LmNvbV0NCj4+U2VudDogRnJpZGF5LCBEZWNlbWJlciAwNSwgMjAxNCAxOjM5IEFNDQo+PlRvOiBC ZXJuaWUgVm9seg0KPj5DYzogU2hlbmcgSmlhbmc7IDxpbnQtZGlyQGlldGYub3JnPg0KPj5TdWJq ZWN0OiBSZTogW0ludC1kaXJdIERIQ1B2NiBleHBlcnQgcmV2aWV3IG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3Bz ZWMtZGhjcHY2LXNoaWVsZA0KPj4NCj4+T24gRGVjIDMsIDIwMTQsIGF0IDk6NTIgUE0sIEJlcm5p ZSBWb2x6ICh2b2x6KSA8dm9sekBjaXNjby5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+IFllcywgcGxlYXNlIHJl dmlldy4gSSBkbyBub3QgaGF2ZSBhbnkgbW9yZSBpbmZvIHRoYW4gd2FzIGluIFRlZCdzIGVtYWls LiBJDQo+Pmd1ZXNzIGZvciBub3csIGxldCdzIGFzc3VtZSBieSBEZWMgMTIuIElmIFRlZCBuZWVk cyBpdCBlYXJsaWVyLCBoZSB3aWxsIG5lZWQgdG8NCj4+bGV0IHlvdSBrbm93Lg0KPj4NCj4+V2hl biBJIGFzayBmb3IgYSByZXZpZXcsIG15IGdlbmVyYWwgYXNzdW1wdGlvbiBpcyB0aGF0IHBlb3Bs ZSB3aWxsIHZvbHVudGVlcg0KPj50byBkbyBpdCBpZiB0aGV5IGhhdmUgdGltZSwgYW5kIHRoYXQg dGhlIHJlc3BvbnNlIHdpbGwgY29tZSBiYWNrICJzb29uLiIgICBJDQo+PmRvbid0IGhhdmUgYSBz cGVjaWZpYyBkZWFkbGluZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCwgYnV0IGFueXRoaW5nIGJleW9uZCBE ZWMuDQo+MTINCj4+aXMgcHJvYmFibHkgdG9vIGxvbmcganVzdCBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IHdpbGwgZmFs bCBvZmYgdGhlIHJhZGFyLiAgIElmIHNvbWVvbmUgY2FuDQo+PnJldmlldyBpdCwgYnV0IGNhbid0 IGdldCBpdCBkb25lIGJlZm9yZSBEZWMuIDEyLiwgSSBjYW4gbGl2ZSB3aXRoIHRoYXQgYXMgbG9u ZyBhcw0KPj50aGV5IGRvIGl0Lg0KPj4NCj4+T2YgY291cnNlLCBJJ20gcGxhbm5pbmcgdG8gZ28g b24gdmFjYXRpb24gdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBNb25kYXksIHNvIGlmIGl0DQo+PmNvbWVzIG91dCBv biBEZWMuIDEyIEkgbWF5IG5vdCBhY3R1YWxseSBiZW5lZml0IGZyb20gdGhlIHJldmlldyB1bnRp bA0KPkphbnVhcnkNCj4+NS4NCj4NCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPkludC1kaXIgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+SW50LWRpckBpZXRmLm9yZw0K Pmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaW50LWRpcg0K From nobody Tue Dec 9 09:16:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE1F1A1BC5 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:05:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQREm7sAnk5V for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4328E1A1BB1 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from cl-1071.udi-01.br.sixxs.net ([2001:1291:200:42e::2]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XyIbZ-0006e3-Sm; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:05:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5486D76B.2080209@si6networks.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 08:05:15 -0300 From: Fernando Gont User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: joel jaeggli , Ted Lemon , jiangsheng@huawei.com References: <723DC7D7-5313-4204-94E0-CCFB84249DFC@nominum.com> <5485428B.5010600@bogus.com> In-Reply-To: <5485428B.5010600@bogus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/yvM6F0zKPW_EmNMf48aN6fMywv0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:16:05 -0800 Cc: opsec chairs , int-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@tools.ietf.org, "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" Subject: [Int-dir] Sheng's review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield (was: Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield) X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:05:37 -0000 Hi, Joel & Ted, I never received Sheng's review (neither the authors nor the corresponding aliases were among the recipients list). But I'm responding to Sheng's feedback below. On 12/08/2014 03:17 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Thanks ted, > > I think a response should be forth-coming. > > joel > > On 12/7/14 8:01 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: >> I requested a review of this document from the intarea >> directorate and got a response from Sheng. There may be another >> review from Ralph later. Could you take a look at Sheng's >> review and respond to it? If you do, please keep me in the >> conversation. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Sheng Jiang Subject: Re: >>> [Int-dir] DHCPv6 expert review of >>> draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield Date: December 7, 2014 at >>> 9:12:16 PM EST To: Ted Lemon , Bernie >>> Volz Cc: "" >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield as an assigned >>> reviewer by the Internet Area directorate. Below is my review >>> comments: >>> >>> Overall, this document proposes an useful mechanism to >>> protecting hosts connected to a switched network against rogue >>> DHCPv6 servers. The proposed mechanism and text are mature. >>> However, I have one major and several minor technical >>> comments: >>> >>> Major technical comments: >>> >>> In section 5, rule 3, the document propose: "When parsing the >>> IPv6 header chain, if ... the packet contains an unrecognized >>> Next Header value, DHCPv6-Shield MUST drop the packet". This >>> default behavior is against RFC7045, which has "Intermediate >>> forwarding nodes SHOULD NOT discard packets containing >>> unrecognised extension headers." Although RFC7045 does allow >>> "default configuration MAY drop such packets", I do not see a >>> necessary reason why we drop such packet here. This seem not >>> relevant to rogue DHCPv6 message at all. The reason is that since there is no uniform format for IPv6 extension headers (yes, I'm aware of RFC6564, but please check draft-gont-6man-rfc6564bis-00), such an EH could be leveraged to conceal a malicious DHCPv6-server packet from the DHCPv6-Shield device. >>> Minor comments: >>> >>> a) DHCP snooping has been understood widely. Why not continue >>> use the similar name, DHCPv6 snooping? A new name "DHCPv6 >>> shield" may imply the mechanism is different. Good question. :-) Will chat with the other c-authors about this... >>> b) In section 5, rule 1, rationale part. Does an >>> implementation that inspect IPv6 headers often enforce a limit >>> on the number of bytes? I personally doubt any implementors >>> would do so. Why one will even do this? So, although I agree >>> the technical point here, I fail to understand the necessity >>> for it. Yes, implementations do that. Typically because they copy the first N bytes to some fast memory to do the inspection. >>> c) Rule 2 section 5. Again, this rule is technically right, >>> but not really relevant to rogue DHCPv6 messages. Therefore, I >>> think the "MUST" is too strong here. You get false negatives if you don't enforce this rule. >>> d) The third last paragraph of section 5, this section seems >>> all relevant to rule 2. The better place is within the relation >>> of rule 2 or a discussion part of rule 2. Below all the filtering rules there's a summary discussion of what eahc rule is doing... that's it. >>> e) The second last paragraph of section 5, "if the >>> DHCPv6-Shield device fails to identify the upper-layer protocol >>> as a result of the use of fragmentation". This may be down to >>> implementation, but it is still unclear here: how a DHCPv6 >>> device decides fragmented packets (not the first fragmented >>> packet) is identify the upper-layer protocol as a result of the >>> use of fragmentation and how it may be failed. Please see RFC7112 >>> f) The first paragraph of section 7. This paragraph describe >>> the scope of this document. It should belong to introduction >>> section rather than security consideration. Will check with the other co-authors what they think. I'd note, though, that this is a pretty normal Sec Cons section (i.e., to explicitly note which attack vectors are not covered). >>> g) This document does not mention Secure DHCPv6 at all. It is >>> relevant, I believe. Personally, I wouldn't mind including a reference to it along the lines of "[DHCPv6] secure allows for authentication of DHCPv6-server packets if the IPv6 addresses of the DHCPv6 servers can be pre-configured at the client nodes". However, it's not clear to me hw http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07.txt ralates to our work. Clearly, our goal is protection that requires zero configuration on the client side, and minimum configuration on the network/switch side. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Tue Dec 9 18:08:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385D1A3BA1 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:56:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vrJnvjUfC0fw for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.emailarray.com (smtp4.emailarray.com [65.39.216.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00551A1BE1 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 50810 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2014 22:56:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.11.93?) (Y2RsQGFzZ2FhcmQub3JnQDY0LjEzNC4yOS4xMTY=) (POLARISLOCAL) by smtp4.emailarray.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Dec 2014 22:56:45 -0000 From: "Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" To: "" Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:56:40 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.8r4576) X-PolarisMail-Flags: Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Bh1FgyC-VMHTDrkvuV8ychP7SSY X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:08:06 -0800 Subject: [Int-dir] friendly reminder X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:56:48 -0000 Greetings all, Just a friendly reminder - when you are doing a review for int-area, please copy your review to the int-dir, the ad's, the id's authors (@tools.ietf.org) and the wg chairs. Thx Christopher -- 李柯睿 Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf From nobody Tue Dec 9 21:43:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374CC1A1B80 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:43:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5lxHiMtLmiyN for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB441A020A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:43:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BMR44267; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:42:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:42:58 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.128]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:42:52 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: Fernando Gont , joel jaeggli , Ted Lemon Thread-Topic: Sheng's review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield (was: Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield) Thread-Index: AQHQE6AW8KbEH6wlTkCZNE5wVKq5KZyIC75A Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:42:51 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AFEA6E7@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <723DC7D7-5313-4204-94E0-CCFB84249DFC@nominum.com> <5485428B.5010600@bogus.com> <5486D76B.2080209@si6networks.com> In-Reply-To: <5486D76B.2080209@si6networks.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/kRrhNXl_2zyAvMkh58S8hF2WVhw Cc: opsec chairs , "int-dir@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@tools.ietf.org" , "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Sheng's review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield (was: Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield) X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:43:06 -0000 PkkgbmV2ZXIgcmVjZWl2ZWQgU2hlbmcncyByZXZpZXcgKG5laXRoZXIgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgbm9y IHRoZQ0KPmNvcnJlc3BvbmRpbmcgYWxpYXNlcyB3ZXJlIGFtb25nIHRoZSByZWNpcGllbnRzIGxp c3QpLiANCg0KSGksIEdvbnQsDQoNCkkgd2FzIGFzc2lnbmVkIHJldmlld2VyIGJ5IHRoZSBJbnRl cm5ldCBBcmVhIGRpcmVjdG9yYXRlIHJlY2VudGx5LiBNeSByZXZpZXcgd2FzIHNlbnQgdG8gaW50 YXJlYSBkaXJlY3RvcmF0ZSB0aGlzIE1vbmRheS4gVGVkIGZvcndhcmRlZCB0byB5b3UgYXQgdGhl IGZpcnN0IHRpbWUuIERpc2N1c3Npb24gaW4gbGluZS4NCg0KPkJ1dCBJJ20NCj5yZXNwb25kaW5n IHRvIFNoZW5nJ3MgZmVlZGJhY2sgYmVsb3cuDQo+DQo+DQo+T24gMTIvMDgvMjAxNCAwMzoxNyBB TSwgam9lbCBqYWVnZ2xpIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gVGhhbmtzIHRlZCwNCj4+DQo+PiBJIHRoaW5rIGEg cmVzcG9uc2Ugc2hvdWxkIGJlIGZvcnRoLWNvbWluZy4NCj4+DQo+PiBqb2VsDQo+Pg0KPj4gT24g MTIvNy8xNCA4OjAxIFBNLCBUZWQgTGVtb24gd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gSSByZXF1ZXN0ZWQgYSByZXZp ZXcgb2YgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBmcm9tIHRoZSBpbnRhcmVhDQo+Pj4gZGlyZWN0b3JhdGUgYW5k IGdvdCBhIHJlc3BvbnNlIGZyb20gU2hlbmcuICAgVGhlcmUgbWF5IGJlIGFub3RoZXINCj4+PiBy ZXZpZXcgZnJvbSBSYWxwaCBsYXRlci4gICBDb3VsZCB5b3UgdGFrZSBhIGxvb2sgYXQgU2hlbmcn cw0KPj4+IHJldmlldyBhbmQgcmVzcG9uZCB0byBpdD8gICBJZiB5b3UgZG8sIHBsZWFzZSBrZWVw IG1lIGluIHRoZQ0KPj4+IGNvbnZlcnNhdGlvbi4NCj4+Pg0KPj4+IFRoYW5rcyENCj4+Pg0KPj4+ IEJlZ2luIGZvcndhcmRlZCBtZXNzYWdlOg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4+IEZyb206IFNoZW5nIEppYW5nIDxq aWFuZ3NoZW5nQGh1YXdlaS5jb20+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOg0KPj4+PiBbSW50LWRpcl0gREhDUHY2 IGV4cGVydCByZXZpZXcgb2YNCj4+Pj4gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vcHNlYy1kaGNwdjYtc2hpZWxkIERh dGU6IERlY2VtYmVyIDcsIDIwMTQgYXQNCj4+Pj4gOToxMjoxNiBQTSBFU1QgVG86IFRlZCBMZW1v biA8VGVkLkxlbW9uQG5vbWludW0uY29tPiwgQmVybmllDQo+Pj4+IFZvbHogPHZvbHpAY2lzY28u Y29tPiBDYzogIjxpbnQtZGlyQGlldGYub3JnPiINCj4+Pj4gPGludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+ Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IEhpLA0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBJIGhhdmUgcmV2aWV3ZWQgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vcHNl Yy1kaGNwdjYtc2hpZWxkIGFzIGFuIGFzc2lnbmVkDQo+Pj4+IHJldmlld2VyIGJ5IHRoZSBJbnRl cm5ldCBBcmVhIGRpcmVjdG9yYXRlLiBCZWxvdyBpcyBteSByZXZpZXcNCj4+Pj4gY29tbWVudHM6 DQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IE92ZXJhbGwsIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgcHJvcG9zZXMgYW4gdXNlZnVsIG1l Y2hhbmlzbSB0bw0KPj4+PiBwcm90ZWN0aW5nIGhvc3RzIGNvbm5lY3RlZCB0byBhIHN3aXRjaGVk IG5ldHdvcmsgYWdhaW5zdCByb2d1ZQ0KPj4+PiBESENQdjYgc2VydmVycy4gVGhlIHByb3Bvc2Vk IG1lY2hhbmlzbSBhbmQgdGV4dCBhcmUgbWF0dXJlLg0KPj4+PiBIb3dldmVyLCBJIGhhdmUgb25l IG1ham9yIGFuZCBzZXZlcmFsIG1pbm9yIHRlY2huaWNhbA0KPj4+PiBjb21tZW50czoNCj4+Pj4N Cj4+Pj4gTWFqb3IgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGNvbW1lbnRzOg0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBJbiBzZWN0aW9uIDUs IHJ1bGUgMywgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IHByb3Bvc2U6ICJXaGVuIHBhcnNpbmcgdGhlDQo+Pj4+IElQ djYgaGVhZGVyIGNoYWluLCBpZiAuLi4gdGhlIHBhY2tldCBjb250YWlucyBhbiB1bnJlY29nbml6 ZWQNCj4+Pj4gTmV4dCBIZWFkZXIgdmFsdWUsIERIQ1B2Ni1TaGllbGQgTVVTVCBkcm9wIHRoZSBw YWNrZXQiLiBUaGlzDQo+Pj4+IGRlZmF1bHQgYmVoYXZpb3IgaXMgYWdhaW5zdCBSRkM3MDQ1LCB3 aGljaCBoYXMgIkludGVybWVkaWF0ZQ0KPj4+PiBmb3J3YXJkaW5nIG5vZGVzIFNIT1VMRCBOT1Qg ZGlzY2FyZCBwYWNrZXRzIGNvbnRhaW5pbmcNCj4+Pj4gdW5yZWNvZ25pc2VkIGV4dGVuc2lvbiBo ZWFkZXJzLiIgQWx0aG91Z2ggUkZDNzA0NSBkb2VzIGFsbG93DQo+Pj4+ICJkZWZhdWx0IGNvbmZp Z3VyYXRpb24gTUFZIGRyb3Agc3VjaCBwYWNrZXRzIiwgSSBkbyBub3Qgc2VlIGENCj4+Pj4gbmVj ZXNzYXJ5IHJlYXNvbiB3aHkgd2UgZHJvcCBzdWNoIHBhY2tldCBoZXJlLiBUaGlzIHNlZW0gbm90 DQo+Pj4+IHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIHJvZ3VlIERIQ1B2NiBtZXNzYWdlIGF0IGFsbC4NCj4NCj5UaGUg cmVhc29uIGlzIHRoYXQgc2luY2UgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gdW5pZm9ybSBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIElQdjYg ZXh0ZW5zaW9uDQo+aGVhZGVycyAoeWVzLCBJJ20gYXdhcmUgb2YgUkZDNjU2NCwgYnV0IHBsZWFz ZSBjaGVjaw0KPmRyYWZ0LWdvbnQtNm1hbi1yZmM2NTY0YmlzLTAwKSwgc3VjaCBhbiBFSCBjb3Vs ZCBiZSBsZXZlcmFnZWQgdG8NCj5jb25jZWFsIGEgbWFsaWNpb3VzIERIQ1B2Ni1zZXJ2ZXIgcGFj a2V0IGZyb20gdGhlIERIQ1B2Ni1TaGllbGQgZGV2aWNlLg0KDQpIb3c/IFRoZSBhbmFseXNpcywg b3IgYXQgbGVhc3QgYSBkZW1vbnN0cmF0aW9uIG9mIHN1Y2ggYXR0YWNrLCBzaG91bGQgYmUgaW4g dGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LiBJZiB0aGUgY29udmluY2libGUgYW5hbHlzaXMgc2hvd2VkIHN1Y2ggYmVo YXZpb3IgYXJlIG5lY2Vzc2FyeSwgSSBhbSBmaW5lIHdpdGggaXQuIEJ1dCBmb3Igbm93LCBzdWNo IGNvbnRlbnQgYXJlIG1pc3NpbmcgaW4gdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KDQo+Pj4+IE1pbm9yIGNvbW1l bnRzOg0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+PiBhKSBESENQIHNub29waW5nIGhhcyBiZWVuIHVuZGVyc3Rvb2Qgd2lk ZWx5LiBXaHkgbm90IGNvbnRpbnVlDQo+Pj4+IHVzZSB0aGUgc2ltaWxhciBuYW1lLCBESENQdjYg c25vb3Bpbmc/IEEgbmV3IG5hbWUgIkRIQ1B2Ng0KPj4+PiBzaGllbGQiIG1heSBpbXBseSB0aGUg bWVjaGFuaXNtIGlzIGRpZmZlcmVudC4NCj4NCj5Hb29kIHF1ZXN0aW9uLiA6LSkgV2lsbCBjaGF0 IHdpdGggdGhlIG90aGVyIGMtYXV0aG9ycyBhYm91dCB0aGlzLi4uDQo+DQo+Pj4+IGIpIEluIHNl Y3Rpb24gNSwgcnVsZSAxLCByYXRpb25hbGUgcGFydC4gRG9lcyBhbg0KPj4+PiBpbXBsZW1lbnRh dGlvbiB0aGF0IGluc3BlY3QgSVB2NiBoZWFkZXJzIG9mdGVuIGVuZm9yY2UgYSBsaW1pdA0KPj4+ PiBvbiB0aGUgbnVtYmVyIG9mIGJ5dGVzPyBJIHBlcnNvbmFsbHkgZG91YnQgYW55IGltcGxlbWVu dG9ycw0KPj4+PiB3b3VsZCBkbyBzby4gV2h5IG9uZSB3aWxsIGV2ZW4gZG8gdGhpcz8gU28sIGFs dGhvdWdoIEkgYWdyZWUNCj4+Pj4gdGhlIHRlY2huaWNhbCBwb2ludCBoZXJlLCBJIGZhaWwgdG8g dW5kZXJzdGFuZCB0aGUgbmVjZXNzaXR5DQo+Pj4+IGZvciBpdC4NCj4NCj5ZZXMsIGltcGxlbWVu dGF0aW9ucyBkbyB0aGF0LiBUeXBpY2FsbHkgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGV5IGNvcHkgdGhlIGZpcnN0IE4N Cj5ieXRlcyB0byBzb21lIGZhc3QgbWVtb3J5IHRvIGRvIHRoZSBpbnNwZWN0aW9uLg0KDQpZZXMs IG9mZmxpbmUgaW5zcGVjdGlvbiBkb2VzIHRoYXQuIEJ1dCB3ZSBhcmUgdGFsa2luZyBhYm91dCBv bmxpbmUgcmVhbCB0aW1lIGZpbHRlciwgYXJlbid0IHdlPw0KDQo+Pj4+IGMpIFJ1bGUgMiBzZWN0 aW9uIDUuIEFnYWluLCB0aGlzIHJ1bGUgaXMgdGVjaG5pY2FsbHkgcmlnaHQsDQo+Pj4+IGJ1dCBu b3QgcmVhbGx5IHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIHJvZ3VlIERIQ1B2NiBtZXNzYWdlcy4gVGhlcmVmb3JlLCBJ DQo+Pj4+IHRoaW5rIHRoZSAiTVVTVCIgaXMgdG9vIHN0cm9uZyBoZXJlLg0KPg0KPllvdSBnZXQg ZmFsc2UgbmVnYXRpdmVzIGlmIHlvdSBkb24ndCBlbmZvcmNlIHRoaXMgcnVsZS4NCg0KWWVzLCBJ IGtub3cgdGhlIGRhbWFnZS4gTXkgcG9pbnQgaXMgaXQgaXMgYSBnZW5lcmljIHJ1bGUgZm9yIGFs bCBJUHY2IGZvcndhcmQgbm9kZXMuIEl0IG1ha2VzIGl0IG9wdGlvbmFsIGZvciBESENQdjYgc2hp ZWxkL3Nub29waW5nLg0KDQo+Pj4+IGQpIFRoZSB0aGlyZCBsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvZiBzZWN0 aW9uIDUsIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiBzZWVtcw0KPj4+PiBhbGwgcmVsZXZhbnQgdG8gcnVsZSAyLiBU aGUgYmV0dGVyIHBsYWNlIGlzIHdpdGhpbiB0aGUgcmVsYXRpb24NCj4+Pj4gb2YgcnVsZSAyIG9y IGEgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBwYXJ0IG9mIHJ1bGUgMi4NCj4NCj5CZWxvdyBhbGwgdGhlIGZpbHRlcmlu ZyBydWxlcyB0aGVyZSdzIGEgc3VtbWFyeSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIG9mIHdoYXQNCj5lYWhjIHJ1bGUg aXMgZG9pbmcuLi4gdGhhdCdzIGl0Lg0KPg0KPj4+PiBlKSBUaGUgc2Vjb25kIGxhc3QgcGFyYWdy YXBoIG9mIHNlY3Rpb24gNSwgImlmIHRoZQ0KPj4+PiBESENQdjYtU2hpZWxkIGRldmljZSBmYWls cyB0byBpZGVudGlmeSB0aGUgdXBwZXItbGF5ZXIgcHJvdG9jb2wNCj4+Pj4gYXMgYSByZXN1bHQg b2YgdGhlIHVzZSBvZiBmcmFnbWVudGF0aW9uIi4gVGhpcyBtYXkgYmUgZG93biB0bw0KPj4+PiBp bXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiwgYnV0IGl0IGlzIHN0aWxsIHVuY2xlYXIgaGVyZTogaG93IGEgREhDUHY2 DQo+Pj4+IGRldmljZSBkZWNpZGVzIGZyYWdtZW50ZWQgcGFja2V0cyAobm90IHRoZSBmaXJzdCBm cmFnbWVudGVkDQo+Pj4+IHBhY2tldCkgaXMgaWRlbnRpZnkgdGhlIHVwcGVyLWxheWVyIHByb3Rv Y29sIGFzIGEgcmVzdWx0IG9mIHRoZQ0KPj4+PiB1c2Ugb2YgZnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiBhbmQgaG93 IGl0IG1heSBiZSBmYWlsZWQuDQo+DQo+UGxlYXNlIHNlZSBSRkM3MTEyDQoNClBsZWFzZSBhZGQg Y2xlYXIgcmVmZXJlbmNlIChpdCBzaG91bGQgcG9pbnQgdG8gYSBjZXJ0YWluIHNlY3Rpb24gb2Yg UkZDIDcxMTIpIGluIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudC4NCg0KPj4+PiBmKSBUaGUgZmlyc3QgcGFyYWdyYXBo IG9mIHNlY3Rpb24gNy4gVGhpcyBwYXJhZ3JhcGggZGVzY3JpYmUNCj4+Pj4gdGhlIHNjb3BlIG9m IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQuIEl0IHNob3VsZCBiZWxvbmcgdG8gaW50cm9kdWN0aW9uDQo+Pj4+IHNl Y3Rpb24gcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gc2VjdXJpdHkgY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbi4NCj4NCj5XaWxsIGNoZWNr IHdpdGggdGhlIG90aGVyIGNvLWF1dGhvcnMgd2hhdCB0aGV5IHRoaW5rLiBJJ2Qgbm90ZSwNCj50 aG91Z2gsIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyBhIHByZXR0eSBub3JtYWwgU2VjIENvbnMgc2VjdGlvbiAoaS5l LiwgdG8NCj5leHBsaWNpdGx5IG5vdGUgd2hpY2ggYXR0YWNrIHZlY3RvcnMgYXJlIG5vdCBjb3Zl cmVkKS4NCj4NCj4+Pj4gZykgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkb2VzIG5vdCBtZW50aW9uIFNlY3VyZSBE SENQdjYgYXQgYWxsLiBJdCBpcw0KPj4+PiByZWxldmFudCwgSSBiZWxpZXZlLg0KPg0KPlBlcnNv bmFsbHksIEkgd291bGRuJ3QgbWluZCBpbmNsdWRpbmcgYSByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gaXQgYWxvbmcg dGhlDQo+bGluZXMgb2YNCj4NCj4iW0RIQ1B2Nl0gc2VjdXJlIGFsbG93cyBmb3IgYXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gb2YgREhDUHY2LXNlcnZlciBwYWNrZXRzIGlmDQo+dGhlIElQdjYgYWRkcmVzc2VzIG9m IHRoZSBESENQdjYgc2VydmVycyBjYW4gYmUgcHJlLWNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgYXQgdGhlDQo+Y2xpZW50 IG5vZGVzIi4NCj4NCj5Ib3dldmVyLCBpdCdzIG5vdCBjbGVhciB0byBtZSBodw0KPmh0dHA6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWRoYy1zZWN1cmUtZGhjcHY2LTA3LnR4dCByYWxh dGVzDQo+dG8gb3VyIHdvcmsuIENsZWFybHksIG91ciBnb2FsIGlzIHByb3RlY3Rpb24gdGhhdCBy ZXF1aXJlcyB6ZXJvDQo+Y29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBvbiB0aGUgY2xpZW50IHNpZGUsIGFuZCBtaW5p bXVtIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gb24gdGhlDQo+bmV0d29yay9zd2l0Y2ggc2lkZS4NCg0KWW91IGhh dmUgcmVmZXJyZWQgdG8gYW4gZXhwaXJlZCBkb2N1bWVudC4gVGhlIGFjdGl2ZSBvbmUgaXMgaHR0 cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtZGhjLXNlZGhjcHY2DQoNCkkgdGhp bmsgdGhleSBhcmUgY29tcGxlbWVudGFyaXR5IHRvIGVhY2ggb3RoZXIuIE5laXRoZXIgb2YgdGhl c2UgcHJvdmlkZSBjb21wbGV0ZSBzZWN1cml0eSBtZWNoYW5pc20gZm9yIGFsbCBkZXBsb3ltZW50 LiBTbywgb25lIG1vcmUgc2VudGVuY2UgY291bGQgc3RhdGUgdGhlIHJlbGF0aW9uOg0KDQpXaGls ZSBESENQdjYgc2hpZWxkL3Nub29waW5nIGZpbHRlcnMgdGhlIHNlcnZlciBtZXNzYWdlcyBmcm9t IHVudHJ1c3RlZCBwb3J0IG9mIGxheWVyLTIgZGV2aWNlcywgdGhlIFNlY3VyZSBESENQdjYgW10g YWxsb3dzIERIQ1B2NiBjbGllbnRzIHRvIG1ha2UgYSBsZWFwIG9mIGZhaXRoIHRoYXQgYSBzZXJ2 ZXIgaXMgdHJ1c3R3b3J0aHkuDQoNCkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCg0KU2hlbmcNCg0KPlRoYW5rcyEN Cj4NCj5CZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsDQo+LS0NCj5GZXJuYW5kbyBHb250DQo+U0k2IE5ldHdvcmtzDQo+ ZS1tYWlsOiBmZ29udEBzaTZuZXR3b3Jrcy5jb20NCj5QR1AgRmluZ2VycHJpbnQ6IDY2NjYgMzFD NiBENDg0IDYzQjIgOEZCMSBFM0M0IEFFMjUgMEQ1NSAxRDRFIDc0OTINCj4NCj4NCj4NCg0K