From nobody Mon Oct 2 19:54:15 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3450B1342FA; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:53:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxZDAknrCab8; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC481342F5; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:53:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b21so4733946qte.2; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:53:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=b1Uti1sHm8nCHQf24gwJuWB9MEBq4wvMkGqBp4H6Bgc=; b=umLp7oSAmBe2rJK++fJv5Bcf5x3DzFsZvfLWoHVoyADse8BF4uzDFnx1vEwHGed36m lRCWVCD/JmhkXZTdylwszT9IFCoKMT2LDVkFejAW7E3F89JwkdBbZK7ydeGw4JVckgjt d+Gl/RT2YAEH/wmpunuOjqr6id0XKmo2YYa1u6Bv+5VzkKC5NQBPxLIgq2VTkXzX/WTm pVHCLVlEfECJ+BCBuQ4Rp2M5YWtPRllmj3uszuLDQV8SLgaqqc8FKl+b8ol6N0/DGMVG 6BXFP9yulgOZ83FCtAo9etJosL9Km+IUWrdodj+LkIOSzrNdjFPSKhPNDN/NvTZQtgji WKqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=b1Uti1sHm8nCHQf24gwJuWB9MEBq4wvMkGqBp4H6Bgc=; b=DUq+zU0vqMpWMpaKJvunNreT7usxfr0tRE89Gjckvq3iLZBGWP66m4kt4reaVDHTFs UcZKPWq03H6yiAbmMiw0EvVBJC8EOBnrGvKPUlu2XDyyWWgP0HxrN99flPVfg1twkaf8 v7uQEVF3rSAQjJ4YKhjXSIy1AwZR+sJ2MS1L+8IA4RzPC/x+lVdUTHjpTQD3KwkdobIV jKQ1ud8OUOvT5HGzJOzlik+gG0nQQ2fhaj0XKC/rzZGmyUdh0JLjZlzpWVnF9pmPkqYQ bMQ3wL4WzdqeHSP+WeNve8kDwaCOM03Do69oMVFRrFJ48Kb8lN64GbWO7ncY7KjRZhAU FTPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhd/p3pYCV8JH+B4X0GlPYWNDTDRN85KKr2KmGw06CMheSlvMxy muOC2xp9EypYv/vGrklMW8+Aoo18snc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBV+uzm3KcJwSwtK0/U7Wcy3PlmNMBEcjlOeAdkuDVKsNCiQUohCj5ICPZWGGXZdPmtU27gTQ== X-Received: by 10.129.78.207 with SMTP id c198mr14223215ywb.121.1506999227029; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.12] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h129sm4647621ywb.67.2017.10.02.19.53.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:53:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Suresh Krishnan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 22:53:45 -0400 To: 6lo@ietf.org, 6man WG , 6tisch@ietf.org, int-area , int-dir@ietf.org, iot-dir@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: [Int-dir] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment" X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 02:53:50 -0000 Hi all, The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their = Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item = titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment=E2=80=9D and the deadline for providing inputs is 2018/01/28. = The statement can be found at=20 https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/ I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced = documents. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process. Thanks Suresh From nobody Tue Oct 3 08:19:48 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD22134B7C; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:42:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8UJTZsjCbAH; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA4D132F3E; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i35so2107095uah.9; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2oLfJMVJk+OBVg8Au/bT6/U2CSf3PkxgQSFq/HxrNi0=; b=uWnSOr8cm3y1NSRI+J/pz6+wtxZAsmN3kmSQz55tWxd/arrfEGAdKEoVO2LbzUcKlB bsU6ZhJlhc6idmXOGmdV/k0SOHTBqPKVFLn0lJmoeSLLd3wgpCRdprNBQbxalS+v94uG 0Yg6CVV+5A6TWYJLZh69eOwxsmaHmFqEvXxA6R64nZh7KCOR2Obk7z2FCjSJMP7aU+w/ NG4jWbFQtAvJsRmSR7eS4oYrNrrHNyEgw5iov+pmGJbL8VMAHe0LRhku7H57nR9OvSeV vlwzFCWVUQvUO1mdcRSdvra/yhThrl7ZOHHaajqjrvMYS/sH+rE2UQPLWxt6lJlkW0PC ypiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2oLfJMVJk+OBVg8Au/bT6/U2CSf3PkxgQSFq/HxrNi0=; b=qnnyzMZOyCCPpZSNyFr7bpKCh9ubdIgaaql+Mt75ZxPa6Gsr712Qt9c7CLyR7DESKY F7Mbtv3nK4dqnnToJVE1YFzQ+glrgFz4F7weFekYTxIM4uyg269o9rahSmpwdxyGZc3w gMxY6FmzLXj9bozoJGrxTSfUOgY4yjCU542FuAR70vnpXbHgWAZ0ciRTex/ohuJa9L+r jyN8hDT3CmnvIkrAQszQj/fxNwslhA517mNXPpCqUXaTwh8/TSVQlcvSA6Q890sI/8Ws Dsh2wev7cJFdhT67FNQxTGvI0SGER+XsX5ppNKx7wBVQLyPgF1nRi0gOzFS9a79cNIyq RhnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUisfeR4V0fllef6S/Jy9UkFbMiotBlh8DR+lvocUC0aBngJHjS/ /h3bZl+HT437DZZ+HP0jRAM3Rb2u2qkpusQK6W0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCf8ThsbM5r4Ny7YD/Ef+qLl1jFxqUL+bphvkQFzwrNg5NjpGvlVqKlRU/x8Tl0YX19BiNUmChtrHEKi16wd3k= X-Received: by 10.176.74.205 with SMTP id t13mr9056178uae.111.1507020142723; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.129.140 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:42:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Samita Chakrabarti Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:42:22 -0700 Message-ID: To: Suresh Krishnan Cc: lo <6lo@ietf.org>, 6man WG , 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>, int-area , int-dir@ietf.org, iot-dir , its@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f8a4c46c781055aa0780a" Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:19:47 -0700 Subject: Re: [Int-dir] [6lo] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment" X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:42:25 -0000 --f403045f8a4c46c781055aa0780a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Suresh, for sharing the information. It looks quite relevant to 6lo WG workarea. We, 6lo-chairs will contact Scott and the ITU-T contact person provided in the liaison note. Will discuss with you on a separate email regarding the steps to connect. -Samita On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi all, > The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their > Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item > titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things > Deployment=E2=80=9D and the deadline for providing inputs is 2018/01/28. = The > statement can be found at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/ > > I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced > documents. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process. > > Thanks > Suresh > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > --f403045f8a4c46c781055aa0780a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Suresh, for sharing the information. It looks quite= relevant to 6lo WG workarea. We, 6lo-chairs will contact Scott and the ITU= -T contact person provided in the liaison note.=C2=A0
Will discuss with= you on a separate email regarding the steps to connect.

-Samita

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan = <suresh.k= rishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
H= i all,
=C2=A0 The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their = Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item tit= led "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment=E2=80=9D and the deadline for providing inputs is 2018/01/28. Th= e statement can be found at

https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/

I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced docu= ments. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process.

Thanks
Suresh


_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

--f403045f8a4c46c781055aa0780a-- From nobody Tue Oct 3 10:16:25 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF209134F2F; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:30:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3m4l9zQJovPE; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BEE7134F38; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q124so17910233wmb.0; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=X+xA+lmGX1wr6X0Vf47d1MVAcEkayVAU77OSTVpcngw=; b=SwyCYgIhbnZb2wkopQWSKhmtEjRjHwFEhpZETT9WfKcJE9ngOFgm3ftFVswmKHdjL1 lxFHKXS1QTZldsF8gcScEBj2FIvGwezril5VjwnxdhypY5ypvIvxiDZzjwDlwtSvXUKD 2rtn2Q+7O2elOmtT4R2DFX9EObF3g0qzoDc65EKhfL7Tw0gaoQFpTFIY1KPO+3CpjmTR Iw/F0IRTgG7Dct2vJm9x7fIJDIkhfauekVfEZRsi4kaCwzIoGYu8kPYGST04d1kaHfGI cd7s0Oq/5BRb5hm/Fc1QOXQ9OqUu75hYiFga5iOrcE+iNb4S3kk88L1o5DuxHtsONpZB WcJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=X+xA+lmGX1wr6X0Vf47d1MVAcEkayVAU77OSTVpcngw=; b=i4m4xwNMJFO6qIhyIL62irI43G9zZR0g2ESZN06NOvYjTKr21E41psO0GvDEW9IVKn t7Z1uqPwJHUThYy5Ogonggyo0FdxoR681fhamHByyXGJ9+iwFrM/pFVpMQabwBaDYhX1 kHR3HYBlb/A5cp2V0If/TrlPZlUIgVLBQ4ywn9HG68/wHNTH0ml5Irde6OopNuAp3nJ8 F4+ViYs8ZVLYoP7XMf+FZ+fnIYcZU8poCDwjl+Nx0NjP2CDlIf80l2VQYcQWZimaCp5j c8N4YkcwTxIv/J8wlmwpA5yUAW40RNNju5SpXB4yJ5vbig9E1r7fbnH+EEiB6sAo/inO W24Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUisNNQpAxUAHzheiyWaUi7LT9wIaZ6Wh3MR9GscggaOoN/+9eD8 0PhBGn2ziBrVZ4gtVnLNmjo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBWYAqt5WxmaM7PT924l//yF4ary1dzTFG+2+vC3e3gTJAYnyU8AeM/ze9x8qjtSOXm+fyCVw== X-Received: by 10.28.134.18 with SMTP id i18mr15413184wmd.27.1507048219110; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:513d:a67a:c717:2308? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:513d:a67a:c717:2308]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm14990882wmm.22.2017.10.03.09.30.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 09:30:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob Hinden Message-Id: <9F2E96BD-F1C5-4DF4-95DB-0AF5CBB5B6AC@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_091AFA1F-AD88-42AA-AFB6-C6F45CB1560E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:30:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: Cc: Bob Hinden , Suresh Krishnan , int-area , its@ietf.org, int-dir@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org, iot-dir , lo <6lo@ietf.org>, lp-wan@ietf.org, IPv6 List , 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org> To: Samita Chakrabarti References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:16:22 -0700 Subject: Re: [Int-dir] [6lo] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment" X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 16:30:26 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_091AFA1F-AD88-42AA-AFB6-C6F45CB1560E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 6man as well, depending on what is in the actual document. Bob > On Oct 3, 2017, at 1:42 AM, Samita Chakrabarti = wrote: >=20 > Thanks Suresh, for sharing the information. It looks quite relevant to = 6lo WG workarea. We, 6lo-chairs will contact Scott and the ITU-T contact = person provided in the liaison note. > Will discuss with you on a separate email regarding the steps to = connect. >=20 > -Samita >=20 > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan = wrote: > Hi all, > The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their = Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item = titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things > Deployment=E2=80=9D and the deadline for providing inputs is = 2018/01/28. The statement can be found at >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/ >=20 > I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced = documents. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process. >=20 > Thanks > Suresh >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > 6lo@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- --Apple-Mail=_091AFA1F-AD88-42AA-AFB6-C6F45CB1560E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJZ07sTAAoJEK7rdBF357uozaQIALHzU4KrKx/zZk9jUN3v8mHm Defrw+89CJQo14SGRitVIuXO/mO6kIxdK6b+JH1FZgB79Pom5yoWdUColheWBfcr bma2/ziSa4+5D+4veFavuFJCuujxhXWZKdhXiyZvsh417z7DCPyrQYlpoEDIqMBj YsHTR05bmYx9uW3TfRkPMA9h40wHf1JqJBMm2LxEFlqyfwVA8dK2Ye5feCFic6HV Igpm/DT0gakW+tGPjh6/oZwg38CByGhSHvRYx1asj4hIs/HPIJJs3KWafNDon6qH qwtMZSLWMI45kWS8n0w0x8euYp5dYzEVSKRMCj+mT5i7dOXjEO/5+NOVcAPPhK4= =SZ3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_091AFA1F-AD88-42AA-AFB6-C6F45CB1560E-- From nobody Tue Oct 3 10:16:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3090F134F88; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQhkBIeUOPuS; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63628134F7A; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id o44so5072924wrf.11; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=C/p1fQRRgDa7lJGOSMhqZ0h60vAMiOp1C+8cg9zGYGg=; b=ga74aNYXZ4561EfTF7AMuncOVJ4BbmNAAx10A+RdT08LmZMbOjJgpgfH0XvWIjQ7Zy Njnm8xo4KJE8TKXYUa8mjrKFdHuSCitAapyDhHQbC+fyO1c6v2dIHNhZVjef884HEmnb LCAWg+0gkAh4mCnCBHMpnSfTnkPqbyAaB6BGmTh6Pk4s/tB+nX7082/SnOXRHrUrP0Hv lYvBQQx0w/CFuoZvSLeCMLusXQSVjemAFh1fOLcYRLhJtofc2Ta2ox204IG9eUWzfX8I Wl5fTU4XB9PVXG27DDTClk0H2FUPGlFJ8ZeWPUTElRSA5cebQooI3CA7nPEIxS7P3qr7 ER2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=C/p1fQRRgDa7lJGOSMhqZ0h60vAMiOp1C+8cg9zGYGg=; b=DjhPNR/4ldruOwHVrq//bVUf9YMY2auHAGo6zQIqJKtdiXW0oS7NlOFcdvEN62+dMV 5zMHcj3bOsWiSd1np1fqPureAbzKCpZ2Gh7s7buYHSv0cKOGaoRou6ugRbGCF35tTTRJ L3aV2CvQYH0cBpR1cN3c6jUtLfUsCliktERmi8jdAqrwpZpCyXhd8q0tysV/bNjYmUc6 VoGUcEYcO38pySuzARAHKd8BnUyd/PqGVpE5XGhfOFUkhIhLZUYd2Y9LlK8RHXz7VmYH 0BFE+GIn2RJ9ULTEDE0o2210tkidx2DCM0OPOWaoW901ImLCK34lEOqtg3xe3FKZ/Lpy e7eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUjnCKCkFyuRqnV/mPfzBp2/qRnB1C+czJUbgWT9D3dVEfXAv8G 8Ldcfqw8+JeHxnsdlwJQ89mdSIXR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBcFOD2y8a1qmRGLDMoGwIFIxJrzWgs1Cf+jVM+pt7GZN/pIkOj1u9aeED5bjsVU3n4i3CaYw== X-Received: by 10.223.157.74 with SMTP id o10mr7060361wre.213.1507050597649; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:e::1ef9? ([2600:8802:5600:e::1ef9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 55sm25009972wrw.60.2017.10.03.10.09.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Baker Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AC7519D8-F1F8-4BBC-80B7-99E42407407D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.2\)) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:09:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, 6man WG , 6tisch@ietf.org, int-area , int-dir@ietf.org, iot-dir@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org To: Suresh Krishnan References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.2) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:16:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment" X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:10:01 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_AC7519D8-F1F8-4BBC-80B7-99E42407407D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Thanks. I would like to also get operational commentary from v6ops. Like = you, when I search for the document, I come up to a paywall; the = document is not openly available. Please forward either the document or = the link when ITU decides to get serious about asking for comment. A general comment: the model being followed in RFC 4861 and in the = various IOT groups is fundamentally as follows. The IPv6 address = consists of a prefix and an IID. In the general Internet, routing = operates on prefixes, and a subnet is identified by a prefix. Within a = subnet defined by WiFi, Bluetooth, IEEE 802.15.4/4g, Power Line = Communication technologies, and the like, network elements generally use = some form of host routing, whether source or distributed, on the = presumption that topologies may be continuously changing or devices may = be moving. 6LowPAN specifically has some recommendations on the = structure of the address designed to minimize the actual size of an IPv6 = header, and in many of them, that is treated as a lower layer problem. = I'd like to believe that the work party is sufficiently clued in to not = want to materially change that without discussing it with us (putting = documents behind a paywall not being a great example of open = discussion). > On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan = wrote: >=20 > Hi all, > The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their = Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item = titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things > Deployment=E2=80=9D and the deadline for providing inputs is = 2018/01/28. The statement can be found at >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/ >=20 > I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced = documents. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process. >=20 > Thanks > Suresh >=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- --Apple-Mail=_AC7519D8-F1F8-4BBC-80B7-99E42407407D Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEctjlJjQmVrp9uMq7EhdRnd2GP+AFAlnTxGAACgkQEhdRnd2G P+AF5BAAj9UyZajt/xa+V+GsLX1GtdYWbxcK4uaE+IHh+uiMepuiO8GGsQDGS8gY VVaReppQX78F0Kt1n6bY1h+zBQMZUsOiU6rd0iEJROGw+/3uWFwETlk6ilGXN7z4 ym/rdDuH7H8VdzU1J2Q4DMwNNTGOigckWH25mREzckV9kKpxe7trJaovcMG1GveT x/Z3b25E9xkZ9fea5vBeEuyBYVec67WMdyE8nzcPNDf7dHxbrwFNw1Hj1e6VXoKY sGDtHar8lF9jRncygnahMsJxoOY2bff0a1h3jhP3knCtoy2ohAlfEFD0g8tVCpKH MMyJBfZb8e51NnP7ABfqb16wdoesFamLVxi9rE6Yb5/F+dhbc7UP8n/Mj5PY51mk LzjPPXRAILEf/Gs4hmay6iWhHvyB+CQfgv1AbpwH5ObzU0oXl70QD9sthnleCg6R lHla8TEKjU8iL0ah4bbEEz81/LAcsVQCHTv613YsdrYtnrOq28TNJmf5Shj4spMM AfsGNyqrilfcN0kFcLdNjWWc45EJhrc2n0rbJffu/BKYrpExuRksenE1LRBsMTCx V65kR4wpSz1c/WZeI9/YQ6p/C+f292fFIF832kt5kAIk4zhjC87GFw2xV9KMiIsp qD6kF0lKMmRNx37tlIru5O/uNlK9AhH5ad89/4IisjEztMPK6RQ= =85O7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_AC7519D8-F1F8-4BBC-80B7-99E42407407D-- From nobody Sun Oct 22 04:54:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCBE1386DE; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 04:54:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.219 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eje-pAy4roE0; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 04:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dash.upc.es (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D794138601; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by dash.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v9MBs5FB046601; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:54:05 +0200 Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204981D53C1; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 83.37.37.84 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <5a9c8563ee1e18ef36e3011da8d5f464.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <150094520677.26176.17525876529879529582@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <150094520677.26176.17525876529879529582@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:54:01 +0200 From: "Carles Gomez Montenegro" To: "Bernie Volz" Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient.all@ietf.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dash X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Delayed for 68:06:58 by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 11:54:17 -0000 Dear Bernie, Thank you very much for your detailed review, and for the constructive feedback provided. We have updated the draft (now, -08). This version should hopefully address your comments. Should you have further comments, please let us know. Cheers, Carles ----------------------- The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-08 ----------------------- > Reviewer: Bernie Volz > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am an assigned INT directorate early reviewer for > draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-07. These comments were written primarily > for > the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. > > Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like > they > would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them > along > with any other comments that have been received. For more details on the > INT > Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. > > I found the document's information interesting, and it is document that is > benefical to the IETF community in understanding the impact energy savings > techniques (mostly related to radios for wireless communication) can have > on > protocols (both at lower and higher layers). It is going for Informational > status, which I think is appropriate for this document. > > All my comments are fairly minor nits. > > In section 1, "Only few efforts focused on" should likely be "Only few > efforts > have focused on"? (Add have) > > In section 1.1, I think this section can be removed as there are no uses > of the > RFC 2119 keywords. > > In section 2, there are a few technologies listed here that might use > references; some do appear later but not all. It is usually a good > question as > to where references are best added since this is overview material. Those > without any references are ITU-T G.9959 and MS/TP-BACnet. > > Also in Figure 2, it is too bad that some power value for listening (when > not > "actively" expecting a packet) isn't included since there is a claim that > this > can use more energy than transmitting, but it would also be a uJ/