From nobody Wed Nov 1 00:40:37 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E52713FAEE; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 00:40:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Zhen Cao To: Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <150952203714.25993.17333137226492207681@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:40:37 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:40:37 -0000 Reviewer: Zhen Cao Review result: Ready with Issues I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherds should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details of the INT directorate, see . This version is quite ready to go, with a small issue that I would like to discussion: In Section. 15 (Reliability of Client Initiated Message Exchanges), I strongly recommend that implementation MUST NOT set both MRC or MRD to ZERO, which attaches a possible risk that the client continues to send this message without a stop. So I would like to propose the following change: s/ " If both MRC and MRD are zero, the client continues to transmit the message until it receives a response." / "The client must be informed with a limit of its retransmission behavior, and MUST NOT set both MRC and MRD to zero" -zhen From nobody Wed Nov 1 06:27:30 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC6313F87C; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:27:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.52 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzlW7gHbgUyc; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D957713942F; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:27:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2227; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1509542836; x=1510752436; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FUU2GCXSXhlfDSwfF7kRLUFw4wxQT5goZWOA4I9l0jc=; b=CCwad0F6rYYJ3vJeiJ+0fPRHgYlN5kCynMwl9yV6qN8gEm60KpYJy//k TxFTHP/v6UphElAjv2gTowpHvhVoqOTRiMWjXjnDSpMwLIO9THNpWqNdV NA0qLeAEo76EIAiK286ApT/2WL4dnSssD3kc28vUGxHQ3GpvTJJ8I0q7S I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CcAAB0yvlZ/4gNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzEuZG4nB44VjxiBfJZEghEKGAuFGAKEfD8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayi?= =?us-ascii?q?FHQEBAQQBATg0CwwEAgEIEQQBAR8JBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIAYoaEKpmixABAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgy6CB4ZmgyKBSRBIhUQFogoClHGTOZVmAhEZAYE?= =?us-ascii?q?4AR84gWx6FUmCZAmEVncBik2BMgGBEAEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,327,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="24666129" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Nov 2017 13:27:15 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vA1DRFOA023005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:27:15 GMT Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:27:14 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:27:14 -0500 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: Zhen Cao , "int-dir@ietf.org" CC: "dhcwg@ietf.org" , "ietf@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 Thread-Index: AQHTUuS5t0NJ+fIQ4E2BcQoavKk7AqL/glXQ Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:27:14 +0000 Message-ID: <1cfea94b1690409595b243f014083bf1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> References: <150952203714.25993.17333137226492207681@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <150952203714.25993.17333137226492207681@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [161.44.67.109] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:27:18 -0000 Hi Zhen: First, thanks for the Int-Dir review. Regarding your comment, the cases where both MRC and MRD are zero is for a = Solicit and Information-Request. And, for those particular cases, the clien= t should probably retransmit "forever" at a hopefully low rate (SOL_MAX_RT = and INF_MAX_RT are 3600 seconds*) to locate a DHCP server. This of course = depends on the RA M & O bits (indicating a DHCP server is available) or the= manual configuration of the client (to explicitly run DHCP). * - RFC 3315 used 120 seconds for these values, but that was updated by RFC= 7083. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Int-dir [mailto:int-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhen Cao Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 3:41 AM To: int-dir@ietf.org Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 Reviewer: Zhen Cao Review result: Ready with Issues I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These comments we= re written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Docume= nt editors and shepherds should treat these comments just like they would t= reat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with = any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details of t= he INT directorate, see . This version is quite ready to go, with a small issue that I would like to discussion: In Section. 15 (Reliability of Client Initiated Message Exchanges), I stron= gly recommend that implementation MUST NOT set both MRC or MRD to ZERO, whi= ch attaches a possible risk that the client continues to send this message = without a stop. So I would like to propose the following change: s/ " If both MRC and MRD are zero, the client continues to transmit the message until it receives a response." / "The client must be informed with a limit of its retransmission behavior, a= nd MUST NOT set both MRC and MRD to zero" -zhen _______________________________________________ Int-dir mailing list Int-dir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Wed Nov 1 20:30:21 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF4A13F843; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:30:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P06Rev-XI3NW; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B751C13F418; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x65so2735150vkx.1; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 20:30:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pXOw+4Uqi6ETPPK9U3k/sT7pL+6pMIiyLGqr93kd0m8=; b=O8C36P1lX6bZQ/SdyKS4y8punv7tpUr45DCC7nV5H5Lo4XaLUBQicIv2KgTq4PnHNt ZhcYJAx8QdX5IjmKB225BBX132TBcJ1IxtjNSEeBuQnsIcyJU8QTzXq99HRIk0rfA5Vi 6XKAosJxGrY1eW4btN/eXfqA7pBQ5Wbluht2Ffqr5+Qg8wjsuitZdFbneumx61L1o8hU XfydIcL5VTG2Ryg4R0w+UjDWBc/9T+1c1bOayPVu877QzKrW47ML+wDHUsA/OpNsqgr7 SCn+g0S3X5XPGrYUcCK6cjOAkHtxziS0vAcE1FSRrQZpuHDd8ZEiJfHyItvM0QD6tjiU rtPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pXOw+4Uqi6ETPPK9U3k/sT7pL+6pMIiyLGqr93kd0m8=; b=cSYtG6V+vUk1P4QS/Oz4mwnjK//w+kKgmpTibB9AfYDy0DTnj5r1JrdXVssaxtVf4W TGyvBZ4DNVoEg30nCTE+944Z6alGQBypB+E6hBbfoMgOYR3gp8/fAAFOT9I9KaPpXWYT kejLawPbG3oSU+wJmSwm4jnLvQ1PF4Gn3YLptR72XW9m8KwiNpez5rS7klVfsSqfmhzg ARdMDe1tbWCqbe7V9iB5GyT9hbh2FIEK0H1EzEF+0P6duy+C1SJ3kgyg0BMoA+pL1LrV 501SQrYeu4Xy/+b96RWxLO5xcaf5cg6h5JiirqqhPUScp+IYEMoF5ZHp1LYolsJu/56d LEsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVGyfihT1VwcPw+Lx23FBef64MOc7dBd6DnNzCOQGCe+D1afk/8 ypulp2YMnLjJWJR83HS+8eX/q81jiP1hKF3GmCA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Th8aEdcDAh/sEokSu62Tg/rMOEz38CHmDIJV+yE+Fwzr3k8E6hZJS4eGANwN1/Krp43i3NChuRJLh9dRYLS4E= X-Received: by 10.31.70.133 with SMTP id t127mr1787975vka.100.1509593402646; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 20:30:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.84.143 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:30:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1cfea94b1690409595b243f014083bf1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> References: <150952203714.25993.17333137226492207681@ietfa.amsl.com> <1cfea94b1690409595b243f014083bf1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> From: Zhen Cao Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:30:02 +0800 Message-ID: To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" Cc: "int-dir@ietf.org" , "dhcwg@ietf.org" , "ietf@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 03:30:08 -0000 Hi Bernie, > First, thanks for the Int-Dir review. My pleasure as always. > > Regarding your comment, the cases where both MRC and MRD are zero is for = a Solicit and Information-Request. And, for those particular cases, the cli= ent should probably retransmit "forever" at a hopefully low rate (SOL_MAX_R= T and INF_MAX_RT are 3600 seconds*) to locate a DHCP server. This of cours= e depends on the RA M & O bits (indicating a DHCP server is available) or t= he manual configuration of the client (to explicitly run DHCP). Then depending on this information, it is up to you to see if there is a need of an affordable better description than the current text. Cheers, zhen > > * - RFC 3315 used 120 seconds for these values, but that was updated by R= FC 7083. > > - Bernie > > -----Original Message----- > From: Int-dir [mailto:int-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhen Cao > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 3:41 AM > To: int-dir@ietf.org > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org > Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 > > Reviewer: Zhen Cao > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These comments = were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Docu= ment editors and shepherds should treat these comments just like they would= treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along wit= h any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details of= the INT directorate, see . > > This version is quite ready to go, with a small issue that I would like t= o > discussion: > > In Section. 15 (Reliability of Client Initiated Message Exchanges), I str= ongly recommend that implementation MUST NOT set both MRC or MRD to ZERO, w= hich attaches a possible risk that the client continues to send this messag= e without > a stop. So I would like to propose the following change: > > s/ > " If both MRC and MRD are zero, the client continues to transmit the > message until it receives a response." > / > "The client must be informed with a limit of its retransmission behavior,= and MUST NOT set both MRC and MRD to zero" > > -zhen > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-dir mailing list > Int-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir From nobody Thu Nov 2 06:34:22 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5632913F65E; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:34:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -13.521 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6OR5WG4Txg5; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697781397F9; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4270; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1509629634; x=1510839234; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=V0AyTB2x4N1XrZ7RBQHl9kFtz7pvxGuXe19bySC3QWc=; b=VzaU4y487kNTOtCEuqkxQ0sxs0TkmTPOJ7pCLg6KGu/Pd0jWkevq/xp2 r6ugkw6eUIebTHg0XU4AKJepYeSOeBiiirGPcrRlpMoyMzCwsPNtxCuVc AXUuR/rE0mzPAR9dtcMkrsxuELVVmpJ2c+n1Zj+W0AWAI2g51SPTZ+zj8 Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CdAACCHftZ/5FdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgwYuZG4nB4N2ih+PG4F8iFCNdYIRChgLhRgCGoQ0PxgBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQFrKIUdAQEBAwEBASEROgsFBwQCAQgRBAEBAwIjAwICAh8GCxQBCAgCBA4FC?= =?us-ascii?q?AGKAgMNCBCob4Inh0INg0gBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ+CH4IHhma?= =?us-ascii?q?CajiBSRAtgn6CYgWhUTwCkAGEcJM7jRqITwIRGQGBOAEfOIFsehVJgmQJglMcg?= =?us-ascii?q?Wd3AYp/gTKBEQEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,334,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="25187865" Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2017 13:33:53 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vA2DXrCu032058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:33:53 GMT Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:33:52 -0500 Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:33:52 -0500 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: Zhen Cao CC: "int-dir@ietf.org" , "dhcwg@ietf.org" , "ietf@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.all@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 Thread-Index: AQHTUuS5t0NJ+fIQ4E2BcQoavKk7AqL/glXQgAFBbwCAAFPdUA== Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:33:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <150952203714.25993.17333137226492207681@ietfa.amsl.com> <1cfea94b1690409595b243f014083bf1@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.197] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 13:34:07 -0000 SGk6DQoNCkkgdGhpbmsgdGhpcyB0ZXh0IGlzIGZpbmUgYXMgaXMuIEl0IGlzIGFsc28gdGV4dCB0 aGF0IHdhcyBtb3ZlZCBmcm9tIFJGQyAzMzE1IChsYXN0IHBhcmFncmFwaCBvZiBTZWN0aW9uIDE0 KSBhbmQgaGFzIGNhdXNlZCBubyBpc3N1ZXMgKHdlbGwsIGl0IGRpZCByZXN1bHQgaW4gUkZDNzA4 MyB0byBjaGFuZ2UgU09MX01BWF9SVCBhbmQgSU5GX01BWF9SVCBkZWZhdWx0cyB0byByZWR1Y2Ug dGhlIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSBvZiByZXRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbnMgLS0gc28gcGVyaGFwcyB3ZSBjYW4gY29u c2lkZXIgdGhhdCB0byBoYXZlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0aGUgaXNzdWU/KS4NCg0KLSBCZXJuaWUNCg0K LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFpoZW4gQ2FvIFttYWlsdG86emhlbmNh by5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0gDQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE5vdmVtYmVyIDAxLCAyMDE3IDEx OjMwIFBNDQpUbzogQmVybmllIFZvbHogKHZvbHopIDx2b2x6QGNpc2NvLmNvbT4NCkNjOiBpbnQt ZGlyQGlldGYub3JnOyBkaGN3Z0BpZXRmLm9yZzsgaWV0ZkBpZXRmLm9yZzsgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1k aGMtcmZjMzMxNWJpcy5hbGxAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbSW50LWRpcl0gSW50ZGly IGVhcmx5IHJldmlldyBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWRoYy1yZmMzMzE1YmlzLTEwDQoNCkhpIEJlcm5p ZSwNCg0KPiBGaXJzdCwgdGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUgSW50LURpciByZXZpZXcuDQpNeSBwbGVhc3Vy ZSBhcyBhbHdheXMuDQoNCj4NCj4gUmVnYXJkaW5nIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudCwgdGhlIGNhc2VzIHdo ZXJlIGJvdGggTVJDIGFuZCBNUkQgYXJlIHplcm8gaXMgZm9yIGEgU29saWNpdCBhbmQgSW5mb3Jt YXRpb24tUmVxdWVzdC4gQW5kLCBmb3IgdGhvc2UgcGFydGljdWxhciBjYXNlcywgdGhlIGNsaWVu dCBzaG91bGQgcHJvYmFibHkgcmV0cmFuc21pdCAiZm9yZXZlciIgYXQgYSBob3BlZnVsbHkgbG93 IHJhdGUgKFNPTF9NQVhfUlQgYW5kIElORl9NQVhfUlQgYXJlIDM2MDAgc2Vjb25kcyopIHRvIGxv Y2F0ZSBhICBESENQIHNlcnZlci4gVGhpcyBvZiBjb3Vyc2UgZGVwZW5kcyBvbiB0aGUgUkEgTSAm IE8gYml0cyAoaW5kaWNhdGluZyBhIERIQ1Agc2VydmVyIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSkgb3IgdGhlIG1h bnVhbCBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBjbGllbnQgKHRvIGV4cGxpY2l0bHkgcnVuIERIQ1Ap Lg0KDQpUaGVuIGRlcGVuZGluZyBvbiB0aGlzIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLCBpdCBpcyB1cCB0byB5b3Ug dG8gc2VlIGlmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgbmVlZCBvZiBhbiBhZmZvcmRhYmxlIGJldHRlciBkZXNjcmlw dGlvbiB0aGFuIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHRleHQuDQoNCkNoZWVycywNCnpoZW4NCg0KPg0KPiAqIC0g UkZDIDMzMTUgdXNlZCAxMjAgc2Vjb25kcyBmb3IgdGhlc2UgdmFsdWVzLCBidXQgdGhhdCB3YXMg dXBkYXRlZCBieSBSRkMgNzA4My4NCj4NCj4gLSBCZXJuaWUNCj4NCj4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBN ZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogSW50LWRpciBbbWFpbHRvOmludC1kaXItYm91bmNlc0BpZXRm Lm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIFpoZW4gQ2FvDQo+IFNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIg MDEsIDIwMTcgMzo0MSBBTQ0KPiBUbzogaW50LWRpckBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBDYzogZGhjd2dAaWV0 Zi5vcmc7IGlldGZAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IA0KPiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWRoYy1yZmMzMzE1YmlzLmFsbEBp ZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBbSW50LWRpcl0gSW50ZGlyIGVhcmx5IHJldmlldyBvZiBkcmFm dC1pZXRmLWRoYy1yZmMzMzE1YmlzLTEwDQo+DQo+IFJldmlld2VyOiBaaGVuIENhbw0KPiBSZXZp ZXcgcmVzdWx0OiBSZWFkeSB3aXRoIElzc3Vlcw0KPg0KPiBJIGFtIGFuIGFzc2lnbmVkIElOVCBk aXJlY3RvcmF0ZSByZXZpZXdlciBmb3IgdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4gVGhlc2UgY29tbWVudHMgd2VyZSB3 cml0dGVuIHByaW1hcmlseSBmb3IgdGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgb2YgdGhlIEludGVybmV0IEFyZWEgRGly ZWN0b3JzLiBEb2N1bWVudCBlZGl0b3JzIGFuZCBzaGVwaGVyZHMgc2hvdWxkIHRyZWF0IHRoZXNl IGNvbW1lbnRzIGp1c3QgbGlrZSB0aGV5IHdvdWxkIHRyZWF0IGNvbW1lbnRzIGZyb20gYW55IG90 aGVyIElFVEYgY29udHJpYnV0b3JzIGFuZCByZXNvbHZlIHRoZW0gYWxvbmcgd2l0aCBhbnkgb3Ro ZXIgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkLiBGb3IgbW9yZSBk ZXRhaWxzIG9mIHRoZSBJTlQgZGlyZWN0b3JhdGUsIHNlZSA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9p ZXNnL2RpcmVjdG9yYXRlLmh0bWw+Lg0KPg0KPiBUaGlzIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgcXVpdGUgcmVhZHkg dG8gZ28sIHdpdGggYSBzbWFsbCBpc3N1ZSB0aGF0IEkgd291bGQgDQo+IGxpa2UgdG8NCj4gZGlz Y3Vzc2lvbjoNCj4NCj4gSW4gU2VjdGlvbi4gMTUgKFJlbGlhYmlsaXR5IG9mIENsaWVudCBJbml0 aWF0ZWQgTWVzc2FnZSBFeGNoYW5nZXMpLCBJIHN0cm9uZ2x5IHJlY29tbWVuZCB0aGF0IGltcGxl bWVudGF0aW9uIE1VU1QgTk9UIHNldCBib3RoIE1SQyBvciBNUkQgdG8gWkVSTywgd2hpY2ggYXR0 YWNoZXMgYSBwb3NzaWJsZSByaXNrIHRoYXQgdGhlIGNsaWVudCBjb250aW51ZXMgdG8gc2VuZCB0 aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2Ugd2l0aG91dA0KPiBhIHN0b3AuICAgIFNvIEkgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBwcm9w b3NlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgY2hhbmdlOg0KPg0KPiBzLw0KPiAiIElmIGJvdGggTVJDIGFuZCBN UkQgYXJlIHplcm8sIHRoZSBjbGllbnQgY29udGludWVzIHRvIHRyYW5zbWl0IHRoZQ0KPiAgICBt ZXNzYWdlIHVudGlsIGl0IHJlY2VpdmVzIGEgcmVzcG9uc2UuIg0KPiAvDQo+ICJUaGUgY2xpZW50 IG11c3QgYmUgaW5mb3JtZWQgd2l0aCBhIGxpbWl0IG9mIGl0cyByZXRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbiBiZWhh dmlvciwgYW5kIE1VU1QgTk9UIHNldCBib3RoIE1SQyBhbmQgTVJEIHRvIHplcm8iDQo+DQo+IC16 aGVuDQo+DQo+DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQo+IEludC1kaXIgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IEludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6 Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pbnQtZGlyDQo=