From yusunn@gmail.com Thu Mar 29 08:17:39 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A37F21E81FE for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1kSDBu9beD2 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4686021E81A0 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so1724920ghb.31 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lIaJa+rjYL5ELuRNXmYejdIIbQK9vaVjaW60ooI/Nko=; b=jnZMzSnsGlniC2twXuYEt+GYafNWlGUqpyBmQ9hRadFFu3+BOroAvmwfPMj8oso4Ma SjXo8K3mW6xxgPWSs+zPrH4vFBoUs2W5YhBjwG5xE/p/cOQSyUPgcuMuJWo9h+Wc2TWC T6PsKmIWaWRqINMWJuwWCJOMiQzKSHl1g/POSfYK+rYJYb4WTqdJTP6QWI6nw4DtKf6v LkatLvoL6dcTYw2jxZ73MaIzoDCMOTbejVPdXXX1KvHLbgeDF5J1OB263xXwz5O9kuFp z4faXhu76Rw9WRbqEeUALGwvDpe9OKE54Jq8zfpf14Y1eW70P2410OC7jwTLrhDgvjqd 6W4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.154.74 with SMTP id g50mr34207836yhk.28.1333034244945; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.102.129 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:17:24 +0800 Message-ID: From: yushang To: ips@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Ips] data exceeds MaxBurstLength X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:17:39 -0000 Hi dear all, If the transmitter (initiator or target) transfer some data exceeds the value MaxBurstLength specified . What shold happen ? It seems rfc3720 do not provide a clause for this situation . Thanks in advance . From Paul_Koning@Dell.com Thu Mar 29 08:30:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A1F21E8218 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:30:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -108.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2MR2UfR6rMU for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ausxipps301.us.dell.com (ausxipps301.us.dell.com [143.166.148.223]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDC021E813B for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Loopcount0: from 10.170.28.41 From: To: , Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:30:20 -0500 Thread-Topic: [Ips] data exceeds MaxBurstLength Thread-Index: Ac0NvyB27RQnvw69TO21nxFYAxNkUAAAZmeg Message-ID: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0313C73940@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Ips] data exceeds MaxBurstLength X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:30:32 -0000 It's covered by the general rules on protocol errors. A reasonable reactio= n would be for the receiving node to close the connection (and probably log= the protocol error using whatever logging machinery it has available). paul -----Original Message----- From: ips-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of yusha= ng Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:17 AM To: ips@ietf.org Subject: [Ips] data exceeds MaxBurstLength Hi dear all, If the transmitter (initiator or target) transfer some data exceeds the val= ue MaxBurstLength specified . What shold happen ? It seems rfc3720 do not p= rovide a clause for this situation . Thanks in advance . _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips From yusunn@gmail.com Fri Mar 30 10:44:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A96521F8618 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WoYgY7bvRBrI for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CCE21F8617 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yenm5 with SMTP id m5so572455yen.31 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aKPKrs9eH+YrwXr3WForCaEqwdH7pYDTY06NPz76do0=; b=QcYxeLHBf6TnH/ArWqbalSxJDkAecWaa26OJgs0Eu3IdbbzMizHMy7oT0YnezLa373 aZSsnMEULYVdPAwZ1EXtIniOy6DGfBXNaG0mZzHXaK16KFXNeXCDiAGdfV9NyzfoJDGR 7jCQOnfPO4xUjndcu9Pi2SlFbUHam5i1Vu7XIVbJDZb6+9JEOA7AbkVD9fQB+C0cPNu5 w6EAVqihoxGaZadSi/WSO+mxZZpW25COXLjx3hSzEnSAgJGI/4e1D22dFL1DdVRpy5vm obRsUWOUcZrUJENoi4bKqPC3aROPLk2c2vViHXa9YNxlh+PeEpJRoUeNPmeh4nHfmSw6 bYxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.182.2 with SMTP id n2mr2877001yhm.11.1333129457662; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.102.129 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 01:44:17 +0800 Message-ID: From: yushang To: ips@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Ips] about iSCSI TEXT negotiation X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:44:18 -0000 Hi dear all, Please think about the following sequence I->TEXT,C=1,F=0 T->TEXT,C=x,F=0,DataSegmentLength=0 What is the valid target response ? Does the value of x matter ? or just DataSegmentLength=0 is enough ? Many thanks .