From nobody Tue Mar 1 12:08:39 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1955E3A0C62 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:08:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Egs5HEOpkKE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11B8E3A0C9A for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id m14so28777508lfu.4 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:08:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2V2xj1m/0ChxECQUKkaui8jP+rs+c3LKMwU5dS3hNjI=; b=phGwX6cUOEAhnlEPJT5iA2gTO7/WFq/7T3D+rRPkTdhHzEOjgzOu/SCO5ANvapwJXw DquLdg6Lwm/NRIulx6uUCPAc4KxnSE6L0JV4H6MyMD0AqY9dA2okxveKLLlG33OI8iPo bG+yUejDoN07HoPWJ8HGnUSTknMXcEt0k2TfIAreansu6d/wLz+q7lH8Po/O0gQd+hS9 tQj5uN9WX0s3doJX1YsTEbaUq80NfXL3bDm88CJXu54/pBTITUM7mlZwNONztW2JwnOp 0OcySyReYLpkQ9CD/hjWgS7oM0S/KkscyqeuxMw/tXkqfni03MBo20PmIoqaj5+NUxZy Xe8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2V2xj1m/0ChxECQUKkaui8jP+rs+c3LKMwU5dS3hNjI=; b=kWPGQ+9YkN8wPCFbOjWQ5Ale/eZPhLNXGWH5TRotTUV0vlI4FaiXDQshqLdO884w45 quMPsEmGvVYCE71TUG3wdFotLsRMranTB8ozeBDJkOQpJ+Q8VXTSqfJtSQud3K8tQb/q zflpr0QZmsVY7EnKXVJZe2kMeXrtFcUCNyLxhqSYPzvE6oMtGWd/QgvWsAccmsPkMWp0 l1wnuSYYBY3lGkQNlreS4FVKpET+iXNKBqNJ1en91iyeet5Ts/PWclFEp6tyNExJldhK yv1ZyWwP9ib47jiO94H0dDDjHEuKfFUz7bAaU1/CYesPgJybZtbDMhPUlgdRP5KUNFLl QsMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CL610mRlGXM2fws+GyeUr2FRPtVKNZYHpWmWsxc22Q2bHS1fN rVMiMaUArKUNlRu3jdNfHf/Oa2I8rWmWGCz8R5k4Wad7ORPXpw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyV7vpwmNX8Z3qwh7Vd9c4h4PZDunf/lFBL0w2WZBOAsChrXwQKWvLKV9OiFknTTa0nmSJYJCzaZX3lvTTJV2o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c2:b0:43e:da9a:35f4 with SMTP id k2-20020a05651210c200b0043eda9a35f4mr16781266lfg.31.1646165308984; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:08:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Tim Bray Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:08:17 -0800 Message-ID: To: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007beaeb05d92dba66" Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 20:08:38 -0000 --0000000000007beaeb05d92dba66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 1. Who's planning to come? 2. Please submit suggested agenda items 3. To start the discussion, here are a few items I'd like to see on the menu: - Meta-discussion: How far are we from having something to send the IESG? There are a few items labeled "task" on our issues list, maybe we can get volunteers - Regexps - I think we wanted a proposal from Cabo? - Candidate issues: -- Should list selectors allow filter selectors? #150 -- Normalized Paths and normalization #155 -- Have we decided whether we're going to have function notation in our v1.0? --0000000000007beaeb05d92dba66 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1. = Who's planning to come?

2. Please submit suggested agenda items

3. To start the discussion, here are a few items I'd = like to see on the menu:

= - Meta-discussion: How far are we from having something to send the IESG? T= here are a few items labeled "task" on our issues list, maybe we = can get volunteers
- Regexps - I think we wanted a proposal from Cabo?
- Candidate issues:=C2=A0
-- Should list selector= s allow filter selectors? #150
-- Normalized Paths and normalization #155
-- Have we decided whether we&= #39;re going to have function notation in our v1.0?




--0000000000007beaeb05d92dba66-- From nobody Wed Mar 2 08:40:52 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324893A0C1C for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:40:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCtuE-fUJyqF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2AA3A0C0B for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id j7so3806471lfu.6 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 08:40:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ihoM8S5v/pWe1SlOVneLY93U1E9EUb2158az1QZ0Gwg=; b=AcGItcvN92IrOABWcDQTwi4b6mUn50O0TPk8fsSdRDyYnzcP5z3YotutSl+c4bi59J NurZsxdpFlGdMtDX1mu91pAje3mcq3Qc3RL1BcrTy+ij/uODqPKdbzl/cw6iJh6SwSut xUc/rBjY5ulluUl2hrlVS4jUOCUfKpWsg1l0Pk05Ss91tIDW6oYyxvm2VGwohs5WFDqr Cj0kjndGPhUhrZhLegr3w7PMyn4WxeTgeNrQFqqCDruwQyX7142934QhU8FoopZv+G7P 7v76UpLAqbtGq+zqA1Glq6CRDSeGhzJq8dcbNhjLD0bl1ktdAqMduAbUC27ZMFTpt3n/ 2kZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ihoM8S5v/pWe1SlOVneLY93U1E9EUb2158az1QZ0Gwg=; b=czjDxpBbaMeuMP6rHpPkuFzyrHeVd4sQiBcHsh4sGtSxoGB839B/gPjJpFIPlwzdHC xKGeTFs8hxJouczJ14Gdeee4cbGZExtukiBkIvZKDuYzypT92weE/NVw6/B24snUHiJB hhZoJGWBVmNH/W4H+FT3nmuBARH5pEeOl8qKmOmglqvoKBHLHmK9hkKE+9k1RkbaP58e Q2hRyY8GtYGGtEwVImWR+VG1zLKNv/YVZWpnlzLkqiAiTsZalaNVzT/l37HSV9b8v99p nbkdBgb3Fb5cRjmmDbmEjC4MaHNOMr/MQEoJDfLLNeCE1iNrWDKNwBmdla2UrngAALEJ FfcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530e2WXGvgCqX1VlZiXXlPoWWi66YZpZdNGYckCmXvBxCV7xHoyI trT9MIk4QIKQ6gncZskgrCTQQHSV4KTBTUwgpJ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYzpQjiKAut1x82VCYn6CUhPQPSflmmrESvCl/Pl9C6K3X7BolAPfnz1YBkloIpnjr6pDZyBJWIgMDrZ1f5Zk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:16a3:b0:445:8f73:24b0 with SMTP id bu35-20020a05651216a300b004458f7324b0mr12803490lfb.181.1646239244010; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 08:40:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Glyn Normington Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:40:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: Tim Bray Cc: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ac85b05d93ef142" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 16:40:51 -0000 --0000000000005ac85b05d93ef142 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm planning to be there. Those agenda items look good to me. On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 20:08, Tim Bray wrote: > 1. Who's planning to come? > > 2. Please submit suggested agenda items > > 3. To start the discussion, here are a few items I'd like to see on the > menu: > > - Meta-discussion: How far are we from having something to send the IESG? > There are a few items labeled "task" on our issues list, maybe we can get > volunteers > - Regexps - I think we wanted a proposal from Cabo? > - Candidate issues: > -- Should list selectors allow filter selectors? #150 > -- Normalized Paths and normalization #155 > -- Have we decided whether we're going to have function notation in our > v1.0? > > > > > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > --0000000000005ac85b05d93ef142 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm planning to be there. Those agenda items look good= to me.

On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 20:08, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
1. Who's planning to come?

2. Please submit suggested agenda = items

3. To start the dis= cussion, here are a few items I'd like to see on the menu:

- Meta-discussion: How far are we fro= m having something to send the IESG? There are a few items labeled "ta= sk" on our issues list, maybe we can get volunteers
- Regexps - I think we wanted a p= roposal from Cabo?
- Candidate issues:=C2=A0
-- Should list selectors allow filter selectors? #150
<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">-- Normalized Paths a= nd normalization #155
-- Have we decided whether we're going to have function notation= in our v1.0?
<= br>

<= div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">

--
JSONpath mailing list
JSONpath@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
--0000000000005ac85b05d93ef142-- From nobody Mon Mar 7 09:16:07 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0283A0FE9 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fq46OBU96lkk for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB543A0F61 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.38] ([88.130.50.18]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue108 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MbizQ-1o198r0lWI-00dCTU; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 18:15:59 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------dXQOO3DJavZHiiPtaU1KP1MK" Message-ID: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:15:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 To: Tim Bray , jsonpath@ietf.org References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=c3=b6ssner?= In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AnRUpl4pTOfPLGjjqgvlQ1DK21h718B00Ytuy/P+NREtLypqTop spP6sLM8dNXl3TF0mp4CCpwWzt2guxXHJ3MB1NaKK8RStU3eJNxsmVcKE7g1nQWAy2lqrwX 6cEncSXf9ICCvehTMxhUv64vGqLX83pxCHIExfuuuKWNO0FbRXYjQELYtSQGxA910RhBC30 O95W32U6TFqwyJa6lq5HQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:86zNLXuwULs=:T2KixazZIzhiDIZwbkkb+5 Y1u5OKso95yZ4rWAB94DVemxtEywHh6VrMappxRC5mI3h/FHXKJ1nossFw5hnGJIWlUDmKRal pvDzhzDXORRAb4Kip6xkMWOqfppvT6tXVU2AOodNu92XS2Cr/k+O5B8jOp8lBsY+oQH9olkXq uc4zIojFl32T9iCP+41HTZye+9gAY9OZjOiFHlLBQSu/utOZySTyukdt9ghUhWRg/n3uvEnQ3 Dz1Niz74Pn0kiHanxdG09Flb822e86UsN/yGTi7e3sMlIw3cUkP9YUA0UBjxb0ZqCiTVgcRIH jKdL9104UUZf2q8tOuFEKw0R4IswGRIFBNpxIe1SKjiVVw7lFFA6BrMOnW1IZB6OMFYGRzTVr iKASfO/d1kPSgxL+PAsB0h/FjJD0LleRHKgn07BuM3UxvGve50jIW+cPIVmLpGj0vh3r5ldk9 itewdYk7mW7/WUQCnemoPfxChTcH+fDpnaKCPAkaOSnF+9oT9x682roRQpoPQvppSQJtPCbnv 6yHEJbb4mJKsaqbPUbbMXcH4+ZzphS7xOXDciydPsa8BhM4fsbNqfSqiYSUgJsth86qORgR1H wJtTmaQDDDHL0T+vRWeugHEnZvCVe5jFUPhfpCCd2H2YOULtNUlx6rENWLQXL/Dm4mthvS29e DqsZ9dVd/A5lKRlMN8X5Yw2RHbmMar5GCW2ZDn67uSRVoC77o/DVhpm9+k4oI++efYJ0= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 17:16:05 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------dXQOO3DJavZHiiPtaU1KP1MK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I will be there, of course ... I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ... * Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156) * Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162) * Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ? * Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161) * Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ? * Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ? * Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145) --------------dXQOO3DJavZHiiPtaU1KP1MK Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 
I will be there, of course ...
I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ...

* Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156)
* Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162)
* Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ?
* Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161)
* Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ?
* Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ?
* Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145)

--------------dXQOO3DJavZHiiPtaU1KP1MK-- From nobody Mon Mar 7 15:33:49 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietf.org Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BF83A13E1; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:33:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: jsonpath@ietf.org Message-ID: <164669601833.26318.3324982228944362995@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:33:38 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-04.txt X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 23:33:41 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the JSON Path WG of the IETF. Title : JSONPath: Query expressions for JSON Authors : Stefan Gössner Glyn Normington Carsten Bormann Filename : draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-04.txt Pages : 34 Date : 2022-03-07 Abstract: JSONPath defines a string syntax for selecting and extracting values within a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON, RFC 8259) value. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-04.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-04 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts From nobody Tue Mar 8 07:54:36 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E33A0FCF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:54:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NCAJ39bM059y for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7B53A0FCB for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id v28so25607566ljv.9 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:54:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pZFKkzSaWrOSEjJipydCFsRM+LwBF9GwtWWPR2JsVBg=; b=j8paD5Vf9dNEAGJEh9elo5hlB0I1XkkOdjMhAP3fKA/6jsWONao11zitEOrPWGUz5s cu572yl0L5bTqZkxFKKo91ZFTgPpIxMtPaW/r1Wak8Br55MD6ekZ26bJ8hw/s0qKBzNd /qvmRjUqwtdZXWn2Ec1N/aatD6wLt8VK/WZWj0M1P4WxHPHE9dx9bXsG8ug+yyvBIKyt 2yC7iFEFRWgb4U/ekFDsfrAqo2eDwsNeG1HZ08052+HBCHhEJOSLeU3lAYHiBX7sWuMl A4CoaVCNZPfSDqPXUN/8TPWAdodV/PLdjehtu3Zhrt8tM+v/oPBb17AU6N694GSsc2PE RmXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pZFKkzSaWrOSEjJipydCFsRM+LwBF9GwtWWPR2JsVBg=; b=QnT/YB+jTcxJyVJGORnTkXW5GLckreA/Ik00u4CMGGET/yPt1R7f6mI3AhcsINDtmO JkzT04TnJTG61WkLq501JkixlC0WKTjxM6TXEntmwdfn6c6uPPeq5I+e82m1B3qwJss+ +HTxNejwacr3bpO992XtsjajN3M/ng1Xr9d+3A/YYU2SP2lwTQUhnqDfiId+EIUBd8rE TQvxlWUGFh56ySKyBjgUfBeQd4WeExN4PRtHczyKRYLOv0EGqH1yVXO2kYjk77WpEEeY TS9lFF+lMcUtgjQMiOf5GnO3UJvYUuARwIGUUYU92xZYowi2EzJqQ7RXjRogGE0aCx4g 5+oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RyM0K/n3ZKRPZ+woygqo9xhLRBEqlo7k8nk++OjnEa4hSIx9c Ieodx7RetZJ9hkpXtLEbJPxQV0enlfUtQ9OKapwJX/rCiy0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJa7s9fpKLFMiaKacM7ZZIb5RRLcfs2kW+2hsaROHmz+LrNoPSJmnwZfVbcUYI951OwaFiHhWyuDl+RwsGvNk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a482:0:b0:245:1b8:65f3 with SMTP id h2-20020a2ea482000000b0024501b865f3mr10956833lji.507.1646754865875; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:54:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net> In-Reply-To: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net> From: Glyn Normington Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:54:13 +0000 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=C3=B6ssner?= Cc: Tim Bray , jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d00ec805d9b6fe4a" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:54:35 -0000 --000000000000d00ec805d9b6fe4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is my input on the agenda items proposed by Tim and Stefan. This partly a note to myself, but it might also help in discerning consensus on particular points. I raised a couple of PRs too. > - Meta-discussion: How far are we from having something to send the IESG? > There are a few items labeled "task" on our issues list, maybe we can get > volunteers > I'd like to understand what the criteria are for sending the spec to the IESG. E.g. what state does iregexp have to be in, does the spec need to be virtually complete or is nearing completion ok? The issues currently labelled "task" are: Edit table 1: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/148 In-line examples: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/136 String normalization: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/117 Examples Appendix: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/69 Security items: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/25 #25 looks the least decided to me. #69 and #136 might turn out to be a bit of a memory test. - Regexps - I think we wanted a proposal from Cabo? > I think PR 163 suffices for the JSONPath spec. But more work is, of course, needed on the iregexp spec. - Candidate issues: > -- Should list selectors allow filter selectors? #150 > I think so. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/165. -- Normalized Paths and normalization #155 > I believe the only loose end in #155 was to introduce Singular Paths. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164. -- Have we decided whether we're going to have function notation in our > v1.0? > I'm not convinced the cost outweighs the benefit, but I could live with a different consensus. * Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156) > > I'm not at all keen on this. * Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162) > > I think '@' should be required, for readability and compatibility. * Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ? > > See my earlier comment. * Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161) > > I'd prefer not to reference standards which are behind a pay-wall. That seems inappropriate for an open standard. > * Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up > ABNF with the rest ? > I'd prefer NOT to mandate this behaviour. * Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ? > Yes, I think so. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164. * Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145) > > I'd prefer PR 145 to be broken into digestible pieces so I can get my hea= d round each of them. Maybe we can discuss some specific examples tomorrow. On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 17:16, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner wrot= e: > I will be there, of course ... > > I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten= 's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ... > > * Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpat= h/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156) > > * Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jso= npath-base/issues/162) > > * Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like= ? > > * Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://githu= b.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161) > > * Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up AB= NF with the rest ? > > * Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ? > > * Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structu= red values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/p= ull/145) > > > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > --000000000000d00ec805d9b6fe4a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Here is my input on the agenda items proposed by Tim = and Stefan. This partly a note to myself, but it might also help in discern= ing consensus on particular points. I raised a couple of PRs too.
=
=C2=A0
- Meta-discussion:=20 How far are we from having something to send the IESG? There are a few=20 items labeled "task" on our issues list, maybe we can get volunte= ers

I'd like to understand what t= he criteria are for sending the spec to the IESG. E.g. what state does ireg= exp have to be in, does the spec need to be virtually complete or is nearin= g completion ok?

The issues currently labelled= "task" are:

Edit table 1: http= s://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/148

#25 looks the least decided to me. #69 and #136 m= ight turn out to be a bit of a memory test.

- Regexps - I think we wanted a proposal from Cabo?<= /div>

I think PR 163 suffices fo= r the JSONPath spec. But more work is, of course, needed on the iregexp spe= c.

- Candidate issues:=C2= =A0
-- Should l= ist selectors allow filter selectors? #150


-- Normalized Paths and normalization #155

I believe the only loose end in #155 wa= s to introduce Singular Paths. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpa= th/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164.

-- Have = we decided whether we're going to have function notation in our v1.0?

I'm not convinced the cost outweig= hs the benefit, but I could live with a different consensus.

= 
* Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath=
-base/issues/156)
I'm not at all keen on thi= s. 

* Making '@' optional (https://g=
ithub.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162)
I think '@' should be required, for readability and= compatibility.

* Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension po=
int here look like ?
See my earlier comment.

* I=
s there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issue=
s/161)
I'd prefer not to reference standards= which are behind a pay-wall. That seems inappropriate for an open standard= .
=C2=A0
* Making output of normalized path= es mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ?
I'd prefer NOT =
to mandate this behaviour.

* Is there value in d= efining the term "singular path" in the spec ?
Yes, I think so. See https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164.= 

* Let's fina=
lly agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (<=
a href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull=
/145" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-json=
path-base/pull/145)
I'd prefer PR 145 to be = broken into digestible pieces so I can get my head round each of them. Mayb= e we can discuss some specific examples tomorrow.

=
On Mon, 7 = Mar 2022 at 17:16, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner <stefan@goessner.net> wrote:
=20 =20 =20 
I will be there, of course ...
I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks=
 to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ..=
.

* Addressing object and array indexes (https://g=
ithub.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156)
* Making '@' optional (https://=
github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162)
* Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point her=
e look like ?
* Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpat=
h-base/issues/161)
* Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... lin=
e up ABNF with the rest ?
* Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in=
 the spec ?
* Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons=
 of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg=
-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145)

--
JSONpath mailing list
JSONpath@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
--000000000000d00ec805d9b6fe4a-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 01:49:13 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D570C3A081A for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:49:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 687W4Jws_i85 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E12F3A0817 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:49:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.38] ([88.130.50.62]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue108 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MYvPq-1nexrC1NL6-00Uv9Z for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:49:02 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------Vd8EKGHtgEnv1Bk4uqlvAkhK" Message-ID: <4353a5f1-4642-1f9c-bde9-5b102261768e@goessner.net> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:49:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 To: jsonpath@ietf.org References: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=c3=b6ssner?= In-Reply-To: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:gMdfiLEgKIaLRVHY5nQSmxfl5jX+XR+DctaKpUL9U9d5nFk2Da9 A4VozDOiby7uQtLUOUXFdZMgU67IJlOxjCkBIoG4h13Y7ETdpstArJNAzX8iBebMB74wjQn 6cZ3skH7IF+urCkP54IieziBk6I7d/w+tRbe9m2hOBQK/pogcTCcBKeBZcFSpGKXhmT9jP8 inY7jU9HhVjqfsdb8Q5IA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:diYUrI4ux9A=:1tDcLeI3XLSdOcnqDEEz+r JJ7kSparQ6lp4QikVGwfy6czBV2rKyeBsk1BlRcuYbbs/kznbCh6ZLKPI9559meTpsgI2Rg1J 6P2sZaaqA7kaWIO1FU0nPMDr1E4xbsfn0VXTpcNM870C0Ltn/rEdoIPogsqN+UA7QzFJMfj6y sdfTv8iwSmuoG8ahUgyNimpp1xxHIy7avUPSYgJ4D15cOKpHpA/PWWK/RLgXZTkur8Odm7eEy mXsj24RKr7GKwk5iB3NJpBIXViDUAfEsSYwff3CxuqjRtuXcKImxZIVZ3qP11AAulI7I8JGlk h1I/KuPxrea1YlN6VQQRR7iBDKvvwpzxVygz5yaMPuzENccvKED2tSmkAhpiP67SIcfRCPdcO fuM4ZJEB8c9XOlZDhCQ0VezwY+7YbFcXWTC1PFIrZiqxVFQOyg8H1uFDaT10e2QYMuj1YXs7m Z8o731t7DOmpLLJ9DjokGYFnfJPNqgacdldLj4Hn+c+3iDmIRbPJiPARNRQ57HUY3i29c4uiM a5htYFGXa4c0EY0owbxPOeaPyEQTEv0D93TEUx0h/Cbg652+ysxn00gk9XZfDLVUtDeTP4RmB f4VYbJXEB6kEzQSAoM7A1ieBpuGnbv7Gzlh0oIqkdr1vElrlWWNFQtxLUQLEHhoflmb70x38S ydxEZKiQbVtxMs9mYhe3ki2L5KVW/baWc+mXAHekj7tJtmE2/oMoaCw/OTHrYsLh3iUw= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 09:49:12 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------Vd8EKGHtgEnv1Bk4uqlvAkhK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ... when and how can I attend ... ? -- sg Am 07.03.2022 um 18:15 schrieb Stefan Gössner: > I will be there, of course ... > I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ... > > * Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156) > * Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162) > * Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ? > * Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161) > * Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ? > * Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ? > * Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145) > > --------------Vd8EKGHtgEnv1Bk4uqlvAkhK Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ... when and how can I attend ... ?
--
sg

Am 07.03.2022 um 18:15 schrieb Stefan Gössner:
I will be there, of course ...
I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ...

* Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156)
* Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162)
* Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ?
* Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161)
* Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ?
* Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ?
* Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145)



--------------Vd8EKGHtgEnv1Bk4uqlvAkhK-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 01:53:02 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCC53A083C for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:53:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOBwi7XzbTW2 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0308A3A0845 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 17so127067lji.1 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 01:52:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zUOR9cH6MixkyZkgzJQp8jl/NqYji2Vh635Kv430TmE=; b=jpvkIJQBuNNfSC/RS3D2BUBf5PDfG80B5F/kOUHqIfy5fetJnCt4zW5s/2akM+5IDC lZSqeQpXvXilRbdjxo8h+/cuXXm19DKRtW251h0posvZLU032buiMK43sAkhHi+8IFbX MvYROupavn326Sy1eQL7xbJysBHMPhrWwgDWcEyiwRYji3SACtH3y6O76NHAsDHLlyAC /oxx5uOvwKF3shEpAq8cvUo6HMgVMRJKN6Zdp13uYehKiWGccK1wk+ZAiJnpdpMY5X5/ yn2bMZuIWKg4SFntJuTAbeptsNRl/UaFswofeVYTHaSHfornsmbvKKF25db42mji8paK DqMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zUOR9cH6MixkyZkgzJQp8jl/NqYji2Vh635Kv430TmE=; b=TKLvml4L5V3FCLP8GO/Gny5cnDgn5Hym+/J94aRnUYdsAvWIg2W14SlbZ958Gab1X7 v253teS75s/ROvySIsTw1G/54cPqnkQt/qRD2jEU+PW9mhaCzABxAOba07meQRLpbUrP Dw3I1bW2cGuwKaaY+te5nogbjJKuj995grFrdXOGhVMwfNBGGs1KCXF8FB2A8G/SFXSt YDobUtqJ+W6cEcJTp4VbJPZZKJzqKylIzw3ZMwSCqG5OR/5S9kU20ux2nEKPWGyuNxFu 7PRFIcGuIbM+txNSn3syhDk4A9oMBB8LNzGVDic7YPf+cSgPPuOJETVULzrmfFZoHQ9w /cUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327ByA1PZloDc6gv2RREqBk40AjrQC9Tjx2YbQ4KjJlgUyFP7xf ycNqTRsbvN1iZDoIS+JKZocHZc9BjKQjWqF38IdadsLkLEk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQXsnfKIwm4aZt6dogh2KfXolK5YCk5Hs4NA0ZPmA8rAxfBpAA7suibc0lWVAFpbTai7SIZ5DosOOQO6aIYcg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1594:b0:247:dce8:b0ec with SMTP id h20-20020a05651c159400b00247dce8b0ecmr12111030ljq.404.1646819574499; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 01:52:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <164398940122.31912.772684425731061068@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <164398940122.31912.772684425731061068@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Tim Bray Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 01:52:42 -0800 Message-ID: To: jsonpath@ietf.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=C3=B6ssner?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bf611205d9c60f77" Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] Fwd: JSON Path (jsonpath) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-03-09 X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 09:53:02 -0000 --000000000000bf611205d9c60f77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: IESG Secretary Date: Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:44 AM Subject: [Jsonpath] JSON Path (jsonpath) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-03-09 To: IETF-Announce Cc: The JSON Path (jsonpath) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2022-03-09 from 10:00 to 12:00 UTC. Agenda: Agenda to follow Information about remote participation: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=916a396c-db97-4405-85d0-f8311802699d -- JSONpath mailing list JSONpath@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath --000000000000bf611205d9c60f77 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>=
Date: Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:44 AM
Subject: [Jsonpath] JSON Path (jso= npath) WG Virtual Meeting: 2022-03-09
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <jsonpath@ietf.org>

<= br>The JSON Path (jsonpath) WG will hold
a virtual interim meeting on 2022-03-09 from 10:00 to 12:00 UTC.

Agenda:
Agenda to follow

Information about remote participation:
https://meet= ings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=3D916a396c-db97-4405-85d0-f8311802699= d

--
JSONpath mailing list
JSONpath@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
--000000000000bf611205d9c60f77-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 06:05:29 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000DA3A0F9D for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:05:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjeWFq8Mw8_F for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D803B3A119A for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:05:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id w12so3940676lfr.9 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 06:05:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NOzQPX76RDTvJBgkLAiAi1/a8BHL6XE67r+dxOZB/ak=; b=QOpjYDmViPThmOqdTXQTmPju1De70A6qTZssS1Hnc2SKhyTN/e+wHnBVF0vZcg8dlq KSgCqEnuT79W/vDfT71bJ1ZGbPZ+RwqWtGq4oKZvs/XaKATiOfJcHGPEAi0Xz08fe/LU K7AJzpPkHe3fB7HSmA5n+v9xI5QEGV/Ozsi6t8t9PZnF7I7jUQvJhs3Mmc/uYMkWioPq KPjap3vVoIYzemWOoU1H8dL9nHYMlYKcydO8BA846ZStb3KcTpkf5DobXoZalgPSGCCc UR9CoXpKB0u2K+BrG4DLNPzSmC/nAiy7Q7l/585chIQCRKmH/5X7O36+XFhfxZtkEx0I p0SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NOzQPX76RDTvJBgkLAiAi1/a8BHL6XE67r+dxOZB/ak=; b=WTAKXqgMoV7M3FM+7dARb3KuYCOfCdPjbxHT5fW1V8yfjm0LnblBJ9YXQZJTxIS0Am 9tV2rjK8lFDbn0qD/S+e2sT3F2JmH14MCocmntXdILSBR7TjPkxK7DjR/8MzGAa7PDpm ieyWuBKOdXQ+ZV+FnApSR9h6I5DTs5rOqz6nN20vfXRtu1mrDjO+hSCayPyDNr6zCTRD wfD+AAuPFwm/FQsnJkPNFrxCN0U7GkRfSyrTu/FLZXr1tVX84usl9iNwgWtBqEVB/8Uy vwB9ExUr/bUGPpC1xikVaMvKCMPbxccnQntcGF7+/7DT4Fm5UjKQ0DgKmtQtGPegBOng XpFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339imXraaoUZAycXY2MHNNzRTne5R/Ka2wvOpMMPX9Hsw0guyYB H+46h1s5BaDyfRktfrnhqUyHY42KXp3Z67TNA3CJRF04DBE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3Z8hLxwNiIdjFGxxJPWqoBlAiGU/mg/CO6jhjtDACBABR3JgCtqAGJN/1A/h2nUq2sYLUktp+hfYs6e0heNw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:16aa:b0:443:bf59:5a4d with SMTP id bu42-20020a05651216aa00b00443bf595a4dmr14438951lfb.622.1646834720315; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 06:05:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Glyn Normington Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:05:09 +0000 Message-ID: To: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000821aa805d9c99622" Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] Spec velocity X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:05:27 -0000 --000000000000821aa805d9c99622 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Now that we are entering the final straight and have rough consensus on most remaining items, I think we should aim for relatively short-lived and/or small PRs to maximise spec velocity and to avoid the need to rebase (with the possibility of making mistakes). Take the current PR 164 on Singular Paths and the newly raised issue 166, for example. These could easily tread on each other's toes since they need to edit the same area of the spec. So I'd like to propose that we merge PRs early and raise issues to cover any outstanding work that needs to be done. In this case, we need to finalise whether to allow non-singular paths in existence checks. But rather than hold up PR 164, I propose we merge the PR now and open an issue to cover the outstanding work. This will allow immediate progress on issue 166 while we are deciding on how to handle the new issue. Similarly, I'd like to propose that we use multiple, small PRs where appropriate (e.g. on issue 136 "In-line examples") to minimise conflicts. In such cases, I would probably use "to do" lists in the corresponding issues to keep track of what remains to be done. Carsten: as the other main active editor, are you comfortable with this approach? Everyone: are you comfortable with this kind of faster iterative approach? Occasionally, it may mean that you have to raise an issue if something is merged before you have had a chance to comment on a PR. Regards, Glyn --000000000000821aa805d9c99622 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Now that we are entering the final straight and have = rough consensus on most remaining items, I think we should aim for relative= ly short-lived and/or small PRs to maximise spec velocity and to avoid the = need to rebase (with the possibility of making mistakes).

Take the current PR 164 on Singular Paths and the newly raised issu= e 166, for example. These could easily tread on each other's toes since= they need to edit the same area of the spec.

So I= 'd like to propose that we merge PRs early and raise issues to cover an= y outstanding work that needs to be done. In this case, we need to finalise= whether to allow non-singular paths in existence checks. But rather than h= old up PR 164, I propose we merge the PR now and open an issue to cover the= outstanding work. This will allow immediate progress on issue 166 while we= are deciding on how to handle the new issue.

Simi= larly, I'd like to propose that we use multiple, small PRs where approp= riate (e.g. on issue 136 "In-line examples") to minimise conflict= s. In such cases, I would probably use "to do" lists in the corre= sponding issues to keep track of what remains to be done.
Carsten: as the other main active editor, are you comfortable w= ith this approach?

Everyone: are you comfortable w= ith this kind of faster iterative approach? Occasionally, it may mean that = you have to raise an issue if something is merged before you have had a cha= nce to comment on a PR.

Regards,
Gly= n
--000000000000821aa805d9c99622-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 06:14:23 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4F43A131C for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:13:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zASowb5KPjpe for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D9B3A1337 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:13:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id o6so3318172ljp.3 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 06:13:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=05sbyBIUZBk7Tn4zkgE9QTMgykpge3BP/En5BfguLFI=; b=GGUC8jljVDsmfnxoSqf0DUEliuxmKM29O6uRat30w/Uma4bTLOwe01mkOqCokXCB8b BmoW413+Yw2/B6IcRLHngMTv7tDvJ3BIklSel19mTSruQ1pROpKB5vli9Cm3gtF9z/Vd 8roT2E+wnCVoqQpz/EY2RDBEIpgsZy8ynCPQctNC6Ab+RgUAGumeoDsFGQnY8c8gj1ef cLNtfMOVa7YJCG9dc2fEvvctoqUJCYWnpwTKUvPL8XrOopki48WJSikExVwVu6ng4Du4 oxutGcqKP2kHY8aIZqj5lCje3COy4jRoz5vJ3xiUINiog9Vmx5VDbbj1jWMZqPcXtYkD Oe/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=05sbyBIUZBk7Tn4zkgE9QTMgykpge3BP/En5BfguLFI=; b=nIoS5N7ccHq8wt9BfMmiGrwLnD2AhFTGhI4eNamNHOmQ4GUeGXOJnSCHP+lG47MhyP tpgg3uNAoUqx3tiTd60ZL2JpmOPWgyZyjuwJHVLTfoGmPbxDDqSCbIOmWfBeeQzqMnvT RVdNOTW9uTVTxExMmTvdvORTe58qVoHKCvsUlN8YwJtOo2lurPGNHa0Y8qFSP8bliUma 8ztz74ds7z6OfFcsZ5na+XBs0Ul0Amhegi0eu/04HhzVMOeHXS9CariiSGYv3NNnd+xa d27X7YAUbGZ4JSDTFZMPy2hM3leEdb3wdpL+7/LOjHg7Dnag5F8YeEQF+7s568kEKk2Y rogQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533olZ0pnST5Yq73VwGfLN/oRDK2AGjclnsOP4abiI6/xCtgsFoN HVf+JJJsqlbMiHjHAfzdXtfSi4+BF/oKaekCab+Czw07Kss= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGVqgs0/lRaj9OyGv0ewKfDgcIIxD24zG7WyhvFoeAjigtIipnT4jC1l4U9tw4l2NFp4w2mAJGbuTx5YXYF2I= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a482:0:b0:245:1b8:65f3 with SMTP id h2-20020a2ea482000000b0024501b865f3mr13843116lji.507.1646835226333; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 06:13:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Glyn Normington Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:13:35 +0000 Message-ID: To: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab537205d9c9b4c9" Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] New issues X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:14:05 -0000 --000000000000ab537205d9c9b4c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I've been through my notes from today's interim WG meeting and raised two issue, both labelled as tasks:* Reorganise and refactor list and filter selector sections (issue 166 ) - quick/editorial, assigned to me * Improve filter selector section (issue 167 ) - more work required, currently unassigned Regards, Glyn --000000000000ab537205d9c9b4c9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've been through my notes from today's interim WG meeti= ng and raised two issue, both labelled as tasks:

<= h1 class=3D"gmail-gh-header-title gmail-mb-2 gmail-lh-condensed gmail-f1 gm= ail-mr-0 gmail-flex-auto gmail-wb-break-word">* Reorganise and refactor list and filter selector sections (issue= 166) - quick/editorial, assigned to me
* Improve filter selector section (issu= e 167) - more work required, currently unassigned
Glyn
--000000000000ab537205d9c9b4c9-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 06:14:31 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020FB3A1777 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:14:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.905 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDSV4_MWWl85 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584C93A11CC for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:14:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.38] ([88.130.50.62]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [213.165.67.97]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mrh9Y-1nxemv24FI-00nlSD; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:13:57 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------bmtA2dAeGEpuKP9E20ds30iv" Message-ID: <51925699-c33b-8b2c-4bd1-9788194ce213@goessner.net> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:13:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 To: Glyn Normington , jsonpath@ietf.org References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=c3=b6ssner?= In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:zY0BPIIQHlRjiqIHMmZkvDihoutV5w60p0zmDlROfYx1TYGSkYm tI2nMPTE6wERJvqUxxuEZkCuh+XhFeq7rm+M3dSF66VIzYcX2makfj/P8ztvgi55SMEODK7 0Wt2aK02/PR0dUvuCDmqj6mlGXEj7a/aUHHjrSQyeDxJpvB4V6mOUiXCkqCbp/d6eoxDfiE xryFbcPAyUl9vPqI2+19Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:eYLcYB4g3ww=:Ji6cpaT5xvVEcmAyfsxics hGCZ7ORQHqlJfpdamUyHRkl7AL+aT/FLjtVqqWyOr8ST7lHu+/iD4jdqFfdpOszzGo71OKLgA cCprnYQm+HlZEGrfuIEDPlRJWFHciUL3/FjeUCZcHv6YWBJM9XFzAh2sqU5Ti0ndX7iIMKCc0 7DE+4W9OcdzALqKUBPrFmFzRDraEvDatnXs3WEoKJM8MfcAtyHIPl7OI4bqL73bSt4mJu4vKK qUqUn7pC6hrxBJxSpQSETt1lfjSLlmIu3D6AH6rcK5iYr6fsM9ynfbFFQYAgP8nhIJ5Zt2a7e n7gEQk5UMrwZIaI9rR07G3ObU5bdhY4PZ3R2yNGrGAg3T7ItnhIxMaMbzA9+3LFkhjGPh1yU+ ZEc5vXLXhn3sK4f9c9GhW1QQYHwbFb1vUch0skoo1zL8r2jMqm++x2OOgIvTcBh9V8BjUmaSF 1QKA5meJRBl/ine9vSCMtquqMRYlOy/2mW26jbg965VonkZwUlGwMTz1+Oxcftjb5pLshPwXk 0G6hdhciJty7qxRbd9oLAQhR+J/so86sgnKCH3d53oLJEot6ksHDZXCnp4jWGsEcHy4RXPQ/C 3eXS3bvbFRvhnFqdqrPfaxF1X7OJRy9HQ0nrbuBh0PocxJZYVbvoVdvfB14xFRvHiOIqJp7aE Wri06TVQSsH2OBRakGpGlUkF1ka13gBg5AxBMtuCs9SwNApAVV21wdOJb9SJR7ZqC9k0= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Spec velocity X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:14:25 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------bmtA2dAeGEpuKP9E20ds30iv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Glyn Normington: > Now that we are entering the final straight and have rough consensus > on most remaining items, I think we should aim for relatively > short-lived and/or small PRs to maximise spec velocity and to avoid > the need to rebase (with the possibility of making mistakes). > > Take the current PR 164 on Singular Paths and the newly raised issue > 166, for example. These could easily tread on each other's toes since > they need to edit the same area of the spec. > > So I'd like to propose that we merge PRs early and raise issues to > cover any outstanding work that needs to be done. In this case, we > need to finalise whether to allow non-singular paths in existence > checks. But rather than hold up PR 164, I propose we merge the PR now > and open an issue to cover the outstanding work. This will allow > immediate progress on issue 166 while we are deciding on how to handle > the new issue. > > Similarly, I'd like to propose that we use multiple, small PRs where > appropriate (e.g. on issue 136 "In-line examples") to minimise > conflicts. In such cases, I would probably use "to do" lists in the > corresponding issues to keep track of what remains to be done. > > Carsten: as the other main active editor, are you comfortable with > this approach? > > Everyone: are you comfortable with this kind of faster iterative > approach? Occasionally, it may mean that you have to raise an issue if > something is merged before you have had a chance to comment on a PR. > > Regards, > Glyn > --------------bmtA2dAeGEpuKP9E20ds30iv Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1

Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Glyn Normington:
Now that we are entering the final straight and have rough consensus on most remaining items, I think we should aim for relatively short-lived and/or small PRs to maximise spec velocity and to avoid the need to rebase (with the possibility of making mistakes).

Take the current PR 164 on Singular Paths and the newly raised issue 166, for example. These could easily tread on each other's toes since they need to edit the same area of the spec.

So I'd like to propose that we merge PRs early and raise issues to cover any outstanding work that needs to be done. In this case, we need to finalise whether to allow non-singular paths in existence checks. But rather than hold up PR 164, I propose we merge the PR now and open an issue to cover the outstanding work. This will allow immediate progress on issue 166 while we are deciding on how to handle the new issue.

Similarly, I'd like to propose that we use multiple, small PRs where appropriate (e.g. on issue 136 "In-line examples") to minimise conflicts. In such cases, I would probably use "to do" lists in the corresponding issues to keep track of what remains to be done.

Carsten: as the other main active editor, are you comfortable with this approach?

Everyone: are you comfortable with this kind of faster iterative approach? Occasionally, it may mean that you have to raise an issue if something is merged before you have had a chance to comment on a PR.

Regards,
Glyn


--------------bmtA2dAeGEpuKP9E20ds30iv-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 11:13:45 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0D63A09A1 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:13:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IvEYyfCRZruh for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:13:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from sonic320-23.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic320-23.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.128.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789F03A09E1 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:13:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1646853216; bh=gbvxKa5rfODT8ugVBiY7JFbMIC3m1rndnfarNPEs6bw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=Nku3LM9LX1pnpnl2Yc6BQ0xtyp2C7h/P2dR5uWv62KBaLt45JJoev/W1O68Xqi/5om/ebnWhGa5/r3Gyo9TYCfKQYeTpkoBx6PMf0b7EcYmV3eFdDzm657xf8j9NvwPLudpJKWzw+qkHwL7i15T+2CzInBf0r/A28HGbqn/JJHEe7lAXCphs2rUUqyX1lOfhZQSPmtfkdLocjwnncrcBADTK9ThG7ibTDksZjMq6aKPLBmaiZalWfGQTYiQoZ/daX/oaSwvbXz5KLU1WhJq4htjzTVp9o4i6SD2gcN71gfUu47K34X0chFvyQmZGypnVi2GL6+95jj0oZn2D51O8Cw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1646853216; bh=692BnbzL9D05PDvmG3VREODYEmbemMHPXtP1qnFCKXD=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=Vm/EluWFkSBklQkwpxNGLBDISMSkjJUOH0bQ7cyZROVac93CI0uWrZ6A2z4DBBBMEpyP3n7Hv98kZrku6774dHDBF8fB526m0cXsdM6yzBdmQNlF4YZOrURamKMSmI1vUkbshwCRd6pGgUQACwHGeu/Csebfsa9PzbtemSTYUJ9ZO6jVwcFnXRo+X7sdAtCMDXMpYtUgjy+NtQcwzBupuLN0HFr2uPc9MG8yCNXHOdkfAeASe6kcrfB9N64IsshCNgdqb66+4SaHB1uo149ZadQ0x9qTpO9qboLbu9kO7NaFjQWioXAC7V052BD9P9Xa0IUlXGTDV5oix3DYeCVUuQ== X-YMail-OSG: JTCbbsQVM1kKuToHqVh_LUN4bizGG_qzvGCXY61M50Y29fMkAQ5zEr5cTsKftRf eFXtkAZr4rRJfk.ZDIH7Y91.GRJh8vXIiz3CCWW4FLB1Vmjkd4okHpv5tx7kyEHOWLq1ja7RupIr UWvxSZAx7aD9.HR09l.SzXQJdBO8uH04kR4XHKfuVd3RS6VYTK4MoiVV70r95epb7dC95UPF3tzC MJevpMRyoMDAmlJrER44k8xJF1cR11jmNRUcCcFRg3dcdQqnqX5ZVAdVAHy6QYpS.wXYr2XTqHCB FDSi2U_938Xg5yMTJ2tvA92DsQGtuR_vaT9X37mHtV0Zgs03zBYaBkCEd8AAXLD5RwwJuciMtccx kY650MnavPlMtydkHKoGmNQpq5ttOEFB5dyWI6TowJegIGNt23KhRz3QlcY46JrdLkbjGsjrWRRB cB2grlwlJQYJhUQ5Mg3qczJYVspLGSjvoCxg0nnfR3a2gzcmdbcA4PVY0BBhDzWkzOumEulWXnkX 9QCIwyOeh.ApgfUt5Fn0jZZbzzJJZg013zlQQSG3Ztq7QWW0njIBJuSKFKfOHEaTqjKyRjdLz1iE 28nLTedt6jNS_EBSXBGFlVbuVsqpjIAtlAC3KUAl83QU7qW3GClQKJJTBaHNIQcZasDfvvSarhnp y9Yx3lUhYhoqoPSkgIS4zbUAayArwlvr13pFUo413siWqhsRjYyMVZ02DjhrZeUwaPm.SGrZQodc FooU4e69VpYAAqXDe4PE4Fd0rN5IQiIlM3nN44znwDYcDKXhFLmIx9rfaNwyNxlV43zRaFo2MSMN 64CeIQAS.AYkyDV0FGkYM1XPY72kEIBmtbAqYrJYmI08fJ0u0tRNH6xKN0nNe7JrlqZQ1ObWdaeY .Do4wcIi_JbgZARXdf7lW0XRCTrL_IvyfYwcitasTxlC8_EGRvlgK2YOv2vaxG9.RFbr91LoRhYm flvtiJ7wFt91yTTfOg90VU4vTG4vQRvmWETVsuRvft5afxWAyMRzPQrhmGC_nuh5W8fyk0o43fb_ srMZjvBcuG70Iy2xQC9f8a4Xgyld6SuWBDVKYzvpuyQMFBdAI4vDxahaPUzgTgTbcY_OMBoxrCb1 mjpk.PXu6p4aMEnt5jtHpifS23JlbN3GGemYNfEh3jnPXG_lnlR_Bqis5vRcBEKKjllUkfQacEbs u56_h154gz5.HjixsBj6z0ppMX872RZfQiK0boqJGY_ni48xFSf9ALSyCQ686EkNmcD88g_13Ngs 0I8xa3XvoLqMCwVQDP6pone6luNSubv5cJKUF7ONnfO1dbOvd.BV3jQLS9wnihj_5ak87A5nsgP8 nHoa1dBQcYxzCpIV9QnKxZYXLwL2heEXbfcnaLtOhaK40VU3fmKGf3Tq3BjQwDNxmAI8.idm7KgA tF8Eco_R6WoFTsQfQNpXmo2X1TBfwXZwWjfpBN9CU889eHmFNosycKLxkPXodazrprELrLssJBjt a49r2ZoIT3PHlgLfakXx3fYZyLoUgkknt79raNbD._DSBdPNwqu90tZ18qD__IRR6EmlncfUXP3o Vx1v95GyUMkBFwrWvd8N1WdGpMS32nwbeAu1fQwxRCPGGwqnYp.qW_M9FSVKGZ5JPeQQDX3FuOWU DNBNaK0XlfIypZ_wjqxzWafIgHltKDkO8pMSB7H29bWXU81vnl2jNTg9_0bHdMhEiYeNzC5cVxW8 JcCItC6VzJJL8cQ50l1eVMWdXMRk1rzManP6NYRKnlMe7SxnfDmw8sg3phca5ORBlFvjFUem1jhW yI0ED6Ue7VTvQVfHTdFbQpGjeeCf33Xmo5aXVOPizWwJTJ.pziWIqx9ywZw0ZVlZTpe6a2byzBZi Iwht_TsxsPuValIo3yIHPvHFardXr4WZXYCyjvbTw16JJHf8AfYiiArxS94rIysrkdaiC1hIcH9h WHjEi5dTsXIn_ca8amAf0ko4DmK9P6d_Xc.W96cjOfWf1ctoUqbWabeeOa6cm0rM7m1GwcCbcert 4nh8BRMvB4lXHhiHDzgh1CUGNmuzY8jeEayi_6sYRUJgTCMcWrvAEwQFeMG.Eg5lwZmOx6bG7PZo QPB9Q.IAf3MwHpQ6GPaiveqUYzuCIQ7mhkfVniUaMzCbB72ER8Wn.bh3X6WERXYiqIKhRqJYr4A6 9.aW3hn480.r6o6bTfZdJ1jYQM5a3tdMzV4zhhqB_KJEtbaQST13c8mwMdqpRLq_0irqHkqyeANY mK_3XVhTONINRdAvM2Qc1GnFqt0CxmC_DFGUXTMkZ1QRAp.KTBZlkJudL2XtZkWJsogrYNpQZPm5 I8_NPEHzuoJ5pdXJTao17I9dkxFN71WoUaonQYXz4_vzQfvSrztIYmKF5mNcBGKnblsvknQyAObP R46UQm8Xovr4xprF_pajtA2Gj8mcLGGzthFncoOM- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic320.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:13:36 +0000 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:13:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Dennis Reply-To: Greg Dennis To: stefan@goessner.net, Glyn Normington , jsonpath@ietf.org Message-ID: <1302328685.214352.1646853207815@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <51925699-c33b-8b2c-4bd1-9788194ce213@goessner.net> References: <51925699-c33b-8b2c-4bd1-9788194ce213@goessner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_214351_967817498.1646853207814" X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19878 YahooMailAndroidMobile Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Spec velocity X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:13:44 -0000 ------=_Part_214351_967817498.1646853207814 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My question about whether we need 164 hasn't been addressed.=C2=A0 I don't = think this PR is required, so merging quickly and opening issues isn't the = right action. =20 =20 On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 3:15 am, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner = wrote: --=20 JSONpath mailing list JSONpath@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath =20 ------=_Part_214351_967817498.1646853207814 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My question about whether we need 164 hasn't been addressed.  I don't = think this PR is required, so merging quickly and opening issues isn't the = right action.

On Thu, 10 Mar 2= 022 at 3:15 am, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner
<stefan@goessner.net> w= rote:
------=_Part_214351_967817498.1646853207814-- From nobody Wed Mar 9 11:24:47 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646713A0A9B for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:24:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEpIUBUOFugs for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6693A0A94 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id z11so5494530lfh.13 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:24:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xv4bLnPmMORHyv8XtnR4SeNoRlmRROQJ12n3wl4rkQM=; b=YPNV7hg/Ol+Ei6R4zBqpvSCnVNZKaKVaRdvXckmODOzWyvIfx3VScEa6SeyQ14nlTc U0d/c3WWdjvBOZVdW5FHxtss14RZ4XlJOal2jJ1fD8H9fH8zNRDfiG4zukRwJyKQJHQi /ZGlNSFvpjroWZQ13Hm7Yhwd0KEe71wiwZSefxhDKY4vvyzzs22QsBvOsbfmOlTqoY8p AFwpVSZLRRnfm87Uzluvt8KgbLWi+L5NVkGJ7O1+XbYu74CaXCU1ChWoS/fmZe/4G1jO WKsQ57s7wrn326bfi0J/YhkBDqOu4+3egHyMk7LnXxW6qAufCDd/LLof4hoNf2+bB9bx 17mA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xv4bLnPmMORHyv8XtnR4SeNoRlmRROQJ12n3wl4rkQM=; b=OOz3NX5uSXg4oNuXiKEWJXrmB+WsEikb5N29hJbsxD+93lP0utMyYvqZw8BU0F1g1m g5vbc2k5R0qXJkkOel/s+tAIkoSPc57g0P1ZKtIkRtSEEAoEAAJRb2LgAvMGLSAIlRtW EoCN4sBKCCvTe+MdQKXmJpwzojFbHdokgPzxuVvtF0an69t0WDeI3pHeR4r+KL4R9KZM boLnqEMMaAHhnHC7leDYDR5dMVs6E+retAgOCuQIpw9XkrHnSZ0zdmRE2jkKlwxg4AHh sN4/952IwLUOVcF49QkdmnM865J/DiaCPA5b27BuZOpve4eWeqa3/QUh2guX3Qm40ShQ DLXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QvjDVt7bg4UCgoTwSKmIbh33HG+7IjsatGd/yXLK2bBdhiOYU 3xrRxd3/45JhcHAE3smTLPn6phrtf6lXGjpvvEQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyd2ZQuZKJK5BMh/kXWQsUAES5ai+53nI1CgBkOQM1uCO4pcKBpi+98oowD2G5B2O5ZRjsjAhAkPowiV391Mg8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:44a5:0:b0:448:27fb:f11b with SMTP id c5-20020ac244a5000000b0044827fbf11bmr762995lfm.72.1646853878164; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:24:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51925699-c33b-8b2c-4bd1-9788194ce213@goessner.net> <1302328685.214352.1646853207815@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1302328685.214352.1646853207815@mail.yahoo.com> From: Glyn Normington Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:24:27 +0000 Message-ID: To: Greg Dennis Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_G=C3=B6ssner?= , jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067b12605d9ce0c87" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Spec velocity X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 19:24:46 -0000 --00000000000067b12605d9ce0c87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg Oh sorry. I've tried to address your concern here: https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164#issue= comment-1063275849. Let's continue in the PR. Regards, Glyn On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 19:13, Greg Dennis wrote: > My question about whether we need 164 hasn't been addressed. I don't > think this PR is required, so merging quickly and opening issues isn't th= e > right action. > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 3:15 am, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner > wrote: > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > > --00000000000067b12605d9ce0c87 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Greg

Oh sorry. I've t= ried to address your concern here: https://g= ithub.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/164#issuecomment-1= 063275849. Let's continue in the PR.

Regar= ds,
Glyn

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 19:13, Greg Dennis <= gregsdennis@yahoo.com> wrot= e:
My question a= bout whether we need 164 hasn't been addressed.=C2=A0 I don't think= this PR is required, so merging quickly and opening issues isn't the r= ight action.

On Thu, 10 Ma= r 2022 at 3:15 am, Stefan G=C3=B6ssner
=
--00000000000067b12605d9ce0c87-- From nobody Tue Mar 15 05:11:18 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3372C3A0EBD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id scK42LNRmaLd for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748F43A0EAF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id t1so23692411edc.3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=ObQyibR04ZSiJ2NjJVZ7z2EBcmmi8s7rbLXfT9w3vus=; b=AlfLSPRd50sE2XY2w1l99u0Q1NYDjgOC8Qs+QuN1PNQsgdOpipLnbzy/cCAvTE7Siq 8S06Yd5AS/hw2SLWQ1LC3E8FkBoHSIJiKCqNHPdB26wOT1Bv31T7npYy6ZTwDjLA3/TB A94f+Y9pYTAlT6gaxZLlybos42qKMMy4z27abx3hf07D89dvucjz/kmJfU1+ZjNHBfF7 Y/D+bDvr7xw5NduP8z63Nc0Kk8RvD7JfK4NJS30PcYEN40n0x0wSaeCTQoAauJr8azSv TurCbXzW10AjmR5iLc3ffhHyZYoz5bYij3nfKfubgxc1hgo7yIEGjb4gOvxsOxX+A/WR seCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=ObQyibR04ZSiJ2NjJVZ7z2EBcmmi8s7rbLXfT9w3vus=; b=ld3wCYf/oRZwFyy7D3ei48m8Ym5Nmwd5nP5RDP/CUlt/BccCFJ76hl/8M1AS+95dhK wmzWoHvAi6C8nW/nzSjzP+CCxjBej7c80DV1a16/dv+pMOEEUBKTnQNUErY6WdrHSYDb w9U3MDrGamPOXdkOQ/9U1EC4XAZyEWSeM475GGTY25H/6y01Ng7dmcH0bjL/CECi4MCJ VmpyiiNqa7XDFsoasjoAfrK23oBjal2sVkB+eQoen0icX0nkrt9yBYSANED+UEHoaxOL F9dCj/nIfMqi2qnDRkdBq90t/sfMqKQOIo3SAgxUgTG9HmoKuF+wvgOve0v8kg2KrTQe DL4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xjcuIJdQPB19ZiqNWLtK4KmFx0am2rlFe21voox17pPJzCvSY GrcT6Lht4orkEQtel68DUZtW1M1NlJc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwUCHxLIOl/cglrWEruIngsbuUeCcR0R3Vc/7VTP22pWuPPL/dP/+PfrlANILBk11/oiQjAg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c2d6:0:b0:416:92d:f6d with SMTP id m22-20020aa7c2d6000000b00416092d0f6dmr24883836edp.121.1647346270409; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:984:65b0:2:dd2:cdeb:8b79:c956]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7-20020a05640240c700b00416cee953dasm7274988edb.24.2022.03.15.05.11.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT) From: James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\)) Message-Id: <83C2B567-2E63-4BE4-B457-F8CFA5BB6108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:11:09 +0100 To: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81) Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] May 2022 interim meeting poll X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:11:17 -0000 Thank you to everyone who attended our interim meeting last week. I'll = send out minutes and actions in the coming days. We'll be having our next meeting towards end of April/early May, and the = poll is available here: https://doodle.com/meeting/organize/id/zbqXqV3a This will be left open for a couple of weeks, and if the times are not = feasible please let us know and we can discuss or expand the polling. Thanks Tim & James JSONPath Chairs= From nobody Tue Mar 15 21:07:49 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC923A0A81 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:07:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAob_Sya8lM9 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sonic301-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic301-1.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 554DC3A0A79 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:07:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1647403641; bh=Alt/NqUPqoWld2/GLFJvlCDzjDjgalb0/tP6M3QEsvQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=N5ZXlQ6T6eMMAfLsjC+xS8Jkeaqwt7vaX5X4JEzaky9XYV4BUUmpeA3XC0FJ8+EevBJEhVQxthJalNsT5GHfk9Pj9jJnwTTPGz08r1U1Bl4y5yPzTDkpjLGmrwixYBkK4mTBAD70+m5qR8Ww0xJVV+QWNGAbRQJHKunWueRAFzpyhiyAV92oxUazKolDRL9MNtrc9vcMWVZspA5KKVZkN/MnMFeO+bTGo+xU+Tj/rsLZ3bhM/MzzsiLzmSc2RjGjI6HlnLptohJysR0UltkF1dsw0FL5KMqaSJRyZxecD10u+ngRlzG7kknb3k9h9U9oP5j47pxSW1apvSXxZ1WXHQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1647403641; bh=qzk3ImB6mfgmoTfT6ey6nG7thbQ6C2BdC+LlqqvJFt+=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=lfRpisR4FmeZ/vwCMvuvRCwar28ny82iAbqbI6mdYap541UyT8tcDrvtQ/N7g79OGdZeH6NAGMnCPuRGFjIq5UD6Ynr/N/2G2vGr+NLtZqBBFYoc2hKWv4BfA7atDATCFSZuR8kpJdyxvLsjWJFyr9N2XU5icIMzW3XHheH2nRflD3gaEuYG0i2cADqMJC72QBEy4mTY0OyGcwns/77gRhtqAjSf2nln/7B4S46H/VNoPftu3f+N2d7Cnk17CvtqVrRd1z2g3lg0HJEScndPHN2BjqtXCz3HcdCm3R0Xx4dxjqjzf1/9Aqivmg4d61D51QzvpsIPovQzKACuLkqGwQ== X-YMail-OSG: 7Cn4KHIVM1mkDIX9hAhV_RHo9uhn5llI_FcU5LuwinqowhQxGewEEUITIp3.KQp q1Lm6bb6.hqbAccBSbaEJlcwZEzeGocb4rYN7fpgIAp75YgGp3.8uMCwXeluEj71wjulSnpxNiQd HnQcbHIm15XbIUddh_eumZoMygdhQyDHezaWUWOEU7xK9iVV7Ca6_HvuCN2HkbPscqD57iJFIgdD VK7AbJgCzAtnglySmmyT3mj29ojrH.9zuGcuvErK7KTGwqkG66s8EKApajnXUJE_Sf50tPEQkKIj iWC_UWaDEOyC31zKlRM5PcXHWjFhKUGZXXhNdYU5n6BCFCN5J2aPKZiJ9dpqU.sJscy.DCkO8OJG OF3Wyin6w4edfukLUCiLZKXxRArHBNn9mY_pKllUGw_FuLur5nj7kXQ7h_vC3rg4sxIc5ibSvaY6 NWVMjSyMjmdSdZA6a5Dho9k8wEfqPrYncdpSZ1yrg3wwTOQj09c4piDD61dk7bpxfF2izgPBrfXQ 0TKGuzz4mKw1n2bnh_AzIecF3GE2IMGdYQKzL4wnVcqagbWzWwP1oq2AF9J170dKj1SQAAORzXz7 svYFdivQDXkQ.xHfe4kMZpOmLYdWZE4CRDSUbbeFzy8yF7P3kjNOFucWgToUeLLGv7.mpm31NQKc A1WSu9L32Ojtqak9CVPlEl36UgrvsQIjhf8NOxwK8nonjLxKdWQ7Q70SgUIvouyGEXh7_7CZtuAF Or5x6WoyynGLOpPKHTIf4tZzgtnhW4_VctGadmvu7BycuUKL4CTG.LCdRSi9WZORjuDj1R8XburX 0nPEWWv9a6eP6u.1CEvKSu.ZtXwii7Ay45poPhgd7OUQttCPqjl91CBpdPfiwlUaAj4pz7HZNIqQ TVrOo_VsEDMct2jbQSw8VjKOdve.GwJMzd9kpE6Ivwg.cO0OcKhTnBGNuSaB_kZ_cOfGUU.FGNwf HuCKECrGT6iWejQuF3blLBS1v.Wpnu.3t8A8E8sbv8JO8jRYHML7omc6MXY3DHMiiHcI0.oNsEPI sGGAQFnx4Vp_YlAGq1vaviXBNSb05EZWINUOsgZ2yxDvGKSWdWIQlgMwEuqEs_NjmVGJeabJvwJg iSm.zodT59v6OnEfr5UHrR.EZb0vC8LXRg2uhmTXRnOE4b5Ce_ynZwFS8ut4aHjhaYf_h3e0cDxZ kvPRWH3bLyleftW0hrcqv6JRnjIVMzz4K6OO7WqfsrDaarbPJqQK9MeVGzQ8QJ5RPG3Xs8kKRDRW tAg15t.Jgpu51nY4kaAmalF7.6lF98h70DfzCED63pBYVcG_M2ZUDOfn5H_EXBJRLD160oX2VaBZ C8oVOGHtUh9wAn.CExd6HLiJA9_DbEYC3XSkIYeyk7VbWnaOH_OfUbCvQiu0GhvSdqH46vTbpBMW .3u6jP0iEjGdYmMG5pac4j5Tiu4RlI8aU_2sWr8bJiNbSxMsgJWQSTsaNHHd9LnGWZWkF0UDcF50 sqoiU0opZtbxux5n8kl73TPPMvakGLhRTxTKUJp47Aq2YdFScb_VxkDapuS1eFAYtXKHeog4IA8Y elVxdAe1QmE.Wb0cupV7AsKpQ1eonW3phlO0FkE1juxyAycrQ.zJvaqzNzfoRnlDtVbFveFo1KTP 0MEOD8RjIwBoF1JTWKUcrhp4sLnEs5yqph8C9z5RRt0uQXwewrVOQbKfFHEcVC0qDMYqGpR7g4AM JQW0BGrVSIJXM1SmNMi9KWL8vfReblaLHThTjjJTUPR8DqsIeDxW2z3r9bKcoUpJyXqjQOc5opD1 VOzA41bNk59S79EHkiNGntOiwEEkKhg9oBJoBrb86VcusorI7.bgCydSjWg6uaOSCEhp9Y6lhPuE SQ4ts6iouL5FuLrBuoU4oJ5EhySnOmN51Cy68GcRBj4rUYg.Fc0x.Wf1ZF15DWZi6SQenikeMTsq HtCCTkI5hAMlgiff0rD8ChPxxvNRCMldhHZpZ3QicjMzUrK9q8c.ojzooXvqpA.SdEIzYXsppcyw Ec5Gw19KWBnrpLTk_t15DMC6KowWL0wGYbMuGP44Jwc0fXBK4dBNeJnvNoVNEl33i4GlFbN1U0lP JqoEqLVFEucrdlGaOi_Cp8tscJBaY29jldcHOojYD5apAeeLIA._FsPTyX7BvuXOoanIttv9Ru4H nulZQICdEjb5oFUmKACbS7GC46tlN0qqkKGPgqVkFOPd_Yl476MU66y7ctNxvXpebDPi0oD9wlEX AA7FkaMvvYw9Z5LHdb6CmQSdiQNWff6__OZ.XdPozFnF.XhEnGpW._udVi.S_vo02pXm2Q6OPusF PjwEqsbGAag_I1uO_w.wPyredL.rLOV2n6mKdhzhNTxeCseJgkruZ.44e_wpx7ANOiv26GE.H9w- - X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 04:07:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 04:07:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Dennis Reply-To: Greg Dennis To: "jsonpath@ietf.org" Message-ID: <1956360621.93572.1647403631835@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_93571_770048707.1647403631833" References: <1956360621.93572.1647403631835.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19929 YahooMailAndroidMobile Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] JSON Path in the wild X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 04:07:48 -0000 ------=_Part_93571_770048707.1647403631833 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OpenAPI are considering JSON Path for an extension spec they're developing. https://github.com/OAI/Overlay-Specification/discussions/2 Current concerns are around security, interoperability, and feature set.=C2= =A0 Specifically for features, they want to ensure that implementations can= return paths, not just query results. Would be good to help them make a decision ;) Greg ------=_Part_93571_770048707.1647403631833 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OpenAPI are considering JSON Path for an extension spec they're developing.

https://github.com/OAI/Overlay-Specification/discussions/2

Current concerns are around security, interoperability, and feature set.  Specifically for features, they want to ensure that implementations can return paths, not just query results.

Would be good to help them make a decision ;)

Greg
------=_Part_93571_770048707.1647403631833-- From nobody Fri Mar 18 08:41:28 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE0F3A0BB4 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:41:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlRKcTdXO_XH for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2005F3A0BBA for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id c2so5297436pga.10 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UJlwFH8nKhyDt7emgeaocYdauZ5qyrn0tF1g6D7sklI=; b=oJd7tHv1RMuUvnWFo5wAljEKXQ1KrYdIdKyAhPHCGjHRZ5GWOJjEog536tPU7rePYP sHblkMqY6c8LZTZoZCTbFNK2LN1R5wnTA47BVvZuNtvjEgd2Xmcz6X6Re5B7kgaD2BE5 ZHwhWM7ytkrWN4GjV4bvj1SINqWJeO67uwmXww7r8u/BbXLGivZz+4rr2bnCwumjFRY9 KDVKsgA+ux1ZdFqL0mUkRnHc8x6ekLjX0fa89G3Q9gODcQByaoM/AtLYq6380pvmAFJf Dh5VyVl2Z+h7+MhKQxDX5l3RcIvCtAjMS4oGyRkbTK89DkSPBhg+NdRYE6/36x5iwXFJ lgoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UJlwFH8nKhyDt7emgeaocYdauZ5qyrn0tF1g6D7sklI=; b=WkdzhAEgFZHdKWoePjbceZaMw4bIc9r9adSGa8S5gDkEgAvjym+nQ8jUhqH8ednsth OY2H6ncloHWG6pihp0NoJCuR7xmThyQbebW9aYTGrrcdm5deLEIyAk+n+zgcn6rQ469i XmivyZjwQexf1RTjAYIRTWVIzmRHC/evkBvgjUdH6W/o040JLTijNiIF270rEYssrpsd GjV1m+2T8eZuhdsQHiIEMzgk+Gtaw3I8D+O5oImF0NGF+YjtBTh/qbvIbEq4+tGWYKPX QGQlqWGCBWKvU1L06kkgvTCGANG+Sr0noJ632sNsvJcTpXDqYjInvcOYYbjc5Iq7vFBV AYdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ucOlJer7LYGcSsJd6OA7qSwMZeNgNtQ2TKeIEni/La6jNslOE vetE+kklKv+LvoBBrjje+1yjD6qcW+o2IWFGfzD81N1Xa8g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwS/UutRwxIxpFJ55FcOg6xcb0Rl0/TIzUiAKuzTtOHEZZMwtI07f+O6tGKEKOMsRu5IoJV3X8UVjtmqsgS11A= X-Received: by 2002:a63:7b4f:0:b0:382:3e2d:2ef7 with SMTP id k15-20020a637b4f000000b003823e2d2ef7mr1316004pgn.165.1647618084609; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:41:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Daniel P Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:41:12 -0400 Message-ID: To: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] github discussions X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:41:28 -0000 Just to note, it seems to me that a number of the posts under Issues on the github site could more properly be considered questions or ideas that do not need to be tracked, unlike real issues. About a year ago, there was a suggestion on this list to enable the github discussions tab on the github site, which is simply a matter of checking this box in Settings -> General. [x] Discussions Discussions is the space for your community to have conversations, ask questions and post answers without opening issues. There was no follow up at the time. Perhaps that could be reconsidered? Best regards, Daniel From nobody Fri Mar 18 09:19:05 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F10A3A0CF3 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XtsVmxtY4Dk for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B6D3A0817 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o6so11933759ljp.3 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9U80yCNR4re4GAluiKYcaJ5RFK87K11O4cN+YhfeO9U=; b=V5NwCQjf1fwjqtCueuV6u8LHf55neQK6FJKEX3FbwYcIRVv2bWob3eYdHKm+bB35yh eM1SvvAWR4E6GAGsZAyli6wEJLCprS0vHKUggDJ4DJz/AUPSkgj8kJgAFeMtQ7z3lemc 1m1cKgdXcbrGoHf9GL0JZbDEv4P/Eig8dLAvEz3bLxAiTfJgEpjBWOycXbX4xr73z6nG z2Oc/+z5sVcNwMoCBGhVWYXnoNNW+W7duQeGBvHFB+2Nah6DrVPnomC7+BBtL4tVpQhj HVpJTVK6vbvO+GW5ErfQUbJRjhYazX4bxezLHw4BqfMaHLeUguM4SpQPSYLVy8c7X1ee pl6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9U80yCNR4re4GAluiKYcaJ5RFK87K11O4cN+YhfeO9U=; b=dyueVq4movk/zHVQpwjZrsPLCyTDvTow44KtKMfbHM8y3Sx9M3+fCo5ToZAPXRBSGG Xda8KNKPDDQIO2RQYtKWjFH+TXLD1op8K+7T7cIpPgy1lrH71ZUaaXLhxRP6spkkHFg6 T4ubaeUHGFJVJm4UUsIKPiOvcaNzCSOvU/rtdHRO9XPcLkwjT75lB8TgpaetdBbw4muF r3H9RRx2hOidGjriv471MOUxm6aBNnNtGBKERNq48uaKFWaf+b2IqspjhhwOELGY0lek KQLdl0AjiAVtVFapbAwWynKrP+gYJTZUHeuhBtK1DjHaH4ztDg0vxU8CNAg0MkP5yDfC FF1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jWilH4wp/0J6VFnmEsG/xfnwqhCBTkTAFksfZ1UD+EgmG9N21 WFQV4D/V1wAdg8NMfOceIytbz5LMuyHv+xXYvsns5t9sEas= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtJBcwf1uifLx+If65L6TFodALv6n9YHRmP/xLiVhFLsOlHRG9NOlWCDQJ3G5Ksesrr196f0PbYpOJtluLIe8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1509:b0:249:6cd6:96d8 with SMTP id e9-20020a05651c150900b002496cd696d8mr2494263ljf.358.1647620335095; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:18:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tim Bray Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:18:43 -0700 Message-ID: To: Daniel P Cc: jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cc63e505da8080c0" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] github discussions X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:19:03 -0000 --000000000000cc63e505da8080c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" No objection here. On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:41 AM Daniel P wrote: > Just to note, it seems to me that a number of the posts under Issues > on the github site could more properly be considered questions or > ideas that do not need to be tracked, unlike real issues. > > About a year ago, there was a suggestion on this list to enable the > github discussions tab on the github site, which is simply a matter of > checking this box in Settings -> General. > > [x] Discussions > > Discussions is the space for your community to have conversations, ask > questions and post answers without opening issues. > > There was no follow up at the time. Perhaps that could be reconsidered? > > Best regards, > Daniel > > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > --000000000000cc63e505da8080c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No = objection here.

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:41 AM Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
Just to note, it seems to me that a number of the= posts under Issues
on the github site could more properly be considered questions or
ideas that do not need to be tracked, unlike real issues.

About a year ago, there was a suggestion on this list to enable the
github discussions tab on the github site, which is simply a matter of
checking this box in Settings -> General.

[x] Discussions

Discussions is the space for your community to have conversations, ask
questions and post answers without opening issues.

There was no follow up at the time. Perhaps that could be reconsidered?

Best regards,
Daniel

--
JSONpath mailing list
JSONpath@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
--000000000000cc63e505da8080c0-- From nobody Fri Mar 18 12:19:27 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0603A0ED4 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBVUCTrj6HBB for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sonic319-26.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic319-26.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.131.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB72B3A0EAC for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1647631160; bh=Jv8kniMAewgVdIDY+wDmbM1fdcjoYRfghBElx5huJqI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=UPBbfJaT68MxTPalID7t/74Cj/44LiU8Zy5VRgmoLv2XF2cvK02JzoGPqZ9ho3a4s+FteM0hPHiK368HBORg9w/2ZfL3rWkjroR77iYZV0ScUDCqVgdzl7tOZZQlp1di1AXUCvZWgMM5vOf5t+tfpbzHspDe4+WmCjnGQSy+s5uje4SGsIDlwKMPDsCF4Po1KygQCPZBf8oJaU0xPuj3v5xWxF8cJ/gJIcss/oDK8op9/Bjh2NH61sNeP1/Ie2pt258CYJhDKHoxUQqA4YWp5HtHnhkmOY0OjhvPrjXz/pkWhI06UR5xpacacoiLy71tSI8yPPVhjaOjf5MoXM5Hkg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1647631160; bh=BVXe52IG4wAKdxUY/7awx7McCktVlwcBaJq5Juy/0zS=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=iHriw4b87QDV/ZJkbWWZX5QY+13npZluzvSUrnJyOeOA53GodAqJLfq4//8KUqFudQ6LaX3UdzzyE+vl3vNCK+V4mF/559JqRGlkeYTXnIPH+T7/tlywba7E02mQJpwXEh2qUbDZ/aDbLLHRNFMuP6Xv/b8WM0HIPcww4nJnHgC6loUbzVeQviwF/Lm95G6h9ZRQzorYOEFyFQwALFT3g9LbFiR2cDBrOJ3HCp64vxtXwyS/8I5hteKUgM8HFbes/yMMLbs8DlKY4pfvtYg19MO23IdXkrSbaQkXfUrtqBaO6QuvKKFfmgbIM56n3+G/bj4CkSVzV9iES9HnIxynxA== X-YMail-OSG: EB.tPHUVM1nIGCJUaJgiBuq8ISaIBhAGZ5_Lpl7K0feqnzmboM_o6ca2i3IoeWb 7_8j1o.eMhN7dKaXdbw0kYTHGrhParFkBj5LM82drO1edZMFPXVpUl7Xp8xGTVSTVDAif.pPMn3d z32fT641oI7Fk.D9HTIZcnRR5QKRtc.cZ2iw5Nc1riuLpaVVMUf7FeGhbrI4tSKkN6e4eZ_S5yrS p5BDosDbzkSK_8sCog0RGBuZSbQ6T2OrSsG2H2NfNnWC4kIC0jy2RSLOlSnujviOOK.imTDR7m9z BqlJYUMWG0mHP9m8P09tsc_uZ5spdC2uRviy8dGne8WD6XxhU0LVodc2n5HfA1YCBGAbq.YW_wo4 I8CuXXNwRCc0bC8Pe7FTFgRkTZbeaBHEAvTtdJJ1BIHlv2b7OK3Tl5aCoMfML8lCBjsHEbl9rxE8 Qa2qQuKEUAvpV7JnPSwAPYQlt9rjI1yGfQPiH7pdRMjdmrYPj49HKIUo4A4pIMVbo4j3Xfeex0eb nFVcJRaV5HHte1o86AB66wwUYbWktP9QYPdnjlK0MDMfv1S3Gbg0aOfT97FbQ4bHW8jTntnKlhS1 ALuV7d3sR02YyppTDnr8sf4UIXnFuhXDT2t5XPX41CqKCCvZBjkNfe8N9QUKB.Waz_wegXRBlcTf ATQJ0Jm5d3NLplmLU0kV7x.lykwFiZNYQIj8yJdvLUFHfJfP7UGYfAQWtCRNZ6JZNffFb9IKbnGL D.u1cz79ap0fW_WEoz3HaNur7OM08W7gkih7MAxhDcB.6wNyFiw2.qjxW_YrWPDhEkb4ItGWFDUz dgu6lllp.vYXbfDw9c1GipZWDw7odE6xYZwCuibVRTzwkF4RXoV6CmhHdANsiyipDGWnC6JLXeku ljDDO0wv_rIHw8lQxUGohHP3GwOeBUP_tFET80E.E7RGb_RTcOAmKvTuP1yR6eCqurk.AyA2.eT5 O0h1bulwUo2xFvP3aihZONOSeErcRccTe.rLRV0HiW7rSfj4iTEPNH3sqd_CjBs2njkOlIod8sNX CsTCpdBY1Gpuw7MuC4uvhEEG3tcglxejil.Tn3KnrWB65NODlaialeS3JtwpvHffBlhdUgoZR1av MPPTQP7n29BZ4r_VxmWuTZ6bExU0VpCs.HddSf_GwpGBRSYZtvQV111KEBE5oe.3.MiccSvdIpnf AGb2JiZPjojWF0jfHAdLOC1jKpKR67RGrsWAEsgoPMfJPXclU_qNq_EyOm0AU8d1SwdLNhqfa2nv VnUS1aajRxPu5im7G9ndTH2RcEt6L6MISNfm4cTVD8f1mkOmVmOTA_Yfn5KOqsWCK_dLKgKBuIZB FxNRJsBwVUyAaxyQIcOhiCB9.x0fiVgX0Tjh0CePa5Dh2Uv6Eya7_zH1hQOJGQYPMJF7tLspWYDm FDP9h4lRFWGj4uYyEOJuTZ3pVlSxbF2GcP1G1Z76FYioQVpPe9g8fOuU8rnnSqq9SMJbAWamVuX5 18AFuHLgI3qObSFfj.NXjFZYgUa8qZPVLpTz6CLSor1E1gusTrqdTv5bjLt.RFYFtZXNe9tFYKkc 3C1X83hPyQ4UN9YT7.zxISX22tGihPulT0fycUSRAGI2gN8yGfITUIqqWGdbvfrRMiwdzbBdTWuk ZTnn2dYposfNDaHHMCfaHiuH1Wmv8633oMP1mNQr1XlmmCMYcFDVxt9XXnzQNFxVVWupVPE3eySE F7m2ZjNUKQrVgSQpK0xuidct.lHiUx1adbAnWHc1NMUe.jn.ioOpbyQm0QugzwAYSbj26BMVzaOM VxB81xQ4Zgv2TWvjSNZpPIM8OUlOWAeJC8GR7r2vmy5xzgPfIGvpaQt6d2I5J0aFOk8vhZosOOuR HuW8U4BDk1cVsVIRlUQkGB5yfdhiX0JOrr_tWdz8g.llN1iR06vs8DLRT.7i4aaAXntLIabuUvHb b1q9rFPC7RuH1uBJSXqm7bLBPFAUeITqCJf.aUASHas2oVETA3uAxLSwxqeeTKD3TX.fcqbKqS_g F5.jOeGO0Usflr9wOXySBlXilgRm4PTlS1_EtjzABeBbzvKq3k4C7sr78oLvN7y.XLW88AsuGfkx ykjz9Oxx8ij925MZ.d.LXq97ffJRvQbq4clTpHehFIkfYasd5EvVOfqWnxEkA7_.RBKJmHABrrCX JKfBlwb95MitY5xEIJW4nOHHMg5lIxyZ_kYFBQ8JixvsGXAj233P0eSmKRD8QYK.IFLTh998VYQq 69iRba.J7QkhHef0FWfaJ4VYzwCiAW0LsZ6ZzSpa0hq2l34ek.2pVKX1zpngKVdu73Hsof6ymw_H FZIiek3y.HGpWdhfwTwrcHPrT7lteTls3i7SdQSaocFCsnJlxTr9qGh40s174_Kv1trdnmV51c3L z4vb4NZsVeGR4TmEsoZFouFk6YYdORmccV_CeDyc- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic319.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 19:19:20 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Dennis Reply-To: Greg Dennis To: tbray@textuality.com, Daniel P Cc: jsonpath@ietf.org Message-ID: <664157934.251245.1647631153698@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_251244_148776950.1647631153697" X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19894 YahooMailAndroidMobile Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] github discussions X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 19:19:26 -0000 ------=_Part_251244_148776950.1647631153697 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We did this on the JSON Schema repo.=C2=A0 User response was 50/50.=C2=A0 P= eople ended up using discussions to discuss spec proposals, which could rig= htly be issues, and they still used issues to ask questions in issues.=C2= =A0 The end result was to have both kinds of content in both areas. This experience has led me to decide against enabling discussions on my per= sonal repos.=C2=A0 I figured it's just easier to have everything in one pla= ce if the majority of people aren't going to be using the feature.=C2=A0 An= d there's not really a good place to document which is for what kind of dis= course. I think discussions and issues are basically the same thing except that dis= cussions has minimal support for threads. Something to consider. =20 =20 On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 5:19 am, Tim Bray wrote: -= -=20 JSONpath mailing list JSONpath@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath =20 ------=_Part_251244_148776950.1647631153697 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We did this on the JSON Schema repo.  User response was 50/50.  P= eople ended up using discussions to discuss spec proposals, which could rig= htly be issues, and they still used issues to ask questions in issues. = ; The end result was to have both kinds of content in both areas.

<= /div>
This experience has led me to decide against enabling discussions= on my personal repos.  I figured it's just easier to have everything = in one place if the majority of people aren't going to be using the feature= .  And there's not really a good place to document which is for what k= ind of discourse.

I think discussions and issues a= re basically the same thing except that discussions has minimal support for= threads.

Something to consider.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 5:19 am, Tim Bray
<= div><tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
------=_Part_251244_148776950.1647631153697-- From nobody Sat Mar 19 06:40:09 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F6F3A1317 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.106 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zF6oyMNybEkb for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757EA3A1300 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id w12so18074476lfr.9 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=URZXFBUpECMYokhKH1y516M3l/1nPa5hpwz73GDxqWg=; b=C8+r30HgW8gBZkqgvLHdPzz/Kbuiz6blQ50dRPcx0FHzZIh8JcIMupxDS3pt60nNhO AK0FI5VzIgboATjmsGXfC3d8Zlv3P2VFpd9PUHOseTL444V0bQdy0+7mU0cSJaqg21z+ XcPXQhSOoygwTDpsofOCNQlmJ2hryXMZNEirMLhmqcRXTiW5mfUfSyDRgScs9Zr7n2cY bhs+YPoLfI9nRHj9Qd8bl4vh/AperhCuzhRzrc7gdBmWVdiImmNaEXd9hMOjX+Z+Aw/K CTKXtDnYIhJotAvo2w+LRyXLmjtpHihSeb08S4NHuV8kQImGlBRYhO2iWZm1mxCSeFkq qveA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=URZXFBUpECMYokhKH1y516M3l/1nPa5hpwz73GDxqWg=; b=B7RhCgop0GDp72THiuW0PftNeIfTVj8MfVourap7akdwERLK1JmHaQpZ4ftr64EMt2 wrhyEFXC5FrwtAWjabvsZqZr+ZIdn/5g2Pv+v98gJ5agYzW5/YCxqOTLizk7lW4KufS1 SBOtkRpn5TkShB8wp29o+BoAeMYU/nvEZPY8pv1ltPP5kc7gFFxw/SOcCCLtPjWIIRWC WSCoxq68CLkpmXcZLJGsx8XsRBhZ09Ggf3Bbm1AtGqaqcSO/n1Pz1k14q3NWiPHgCxdY 8lT4jcMRlH0mL2LTfd2teF/QYAVUjhUCHCuaHMUOGG5jtGVnIrS09mA0XJ5m1NJ2+Nz4 Usaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532c5lxcUDs02K22dqLioeuyxu04OhD1pRL4pT55dMMVeP1rIPuZ KhsBfVC9v1jupCc77pMSZjV0+hxIU/27JPppkxc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeV6lV20UH9Hjr9oLOFYjDAHA+ahWggbTjg/VfJqa24JG1z5b6CGF1X4kjUVQ0Mf4BnPGII7qQjvnj2ZL8iyg= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4e98:0:b0:448:3039:d170 with SMTP id o24-20020ac24e98000000b004483039d170mr9557029lfr.233.1647697199992; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <664157934.251245.1647631153698@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <664157934.251245.1647631153698@mail.yahoo.com> From: Glyn Normington Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:39:48 +0000 Message-ID: To: Greg Dennis Cc: Tim Bray , Daniel P , jsonpath@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004d938505da926636" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] github discussions X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:40:07 -0000 --0000000000004d938505da926636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" If we enable github discussions, presumably some will happen there which would have happened here. Since github is proprietary, I think there is a better chance of discussions on this mailing list being available for posterity. So I'd prefer not to enable github discussions. On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 19:19, Greg Dennis wrote: > We did this on the JSON Schema repo. User response was 50/50. People > ended up using discussions to discuss spec proposals, which could rightly > be issues, and they still used issues to ask questions in issues. The end > result was to have both kinds of content in both areas. > > This experience has led me to decide against enabling discussions on my > personal repos. I figured it's just easier to have everything in one place > if the majority of people aren't going to be using the feature. And > there's not really a good place to document which is for what kind of > discourse. > > I think discussions and issues are basically the same thing except that > discussions has minimal support for threads. > > Something to consider. > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 5:19 am, Tim Bray > wrote: > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > > -- > JSONpath mailing list > JSONpath@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath > --0000000000004d938505da926636 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If we enable github discussions, presumably some will happ= en there which would have happened here. Since github is proprietary, I thi= nk there is a better chance of discussions on this mailing list being avail= able for posterity. So I'd prefer not to enable github discussions.
=

= On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 19:19, Greg Dennis <gregsdennis=3D40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
We did this on the= JSON Schema repo.=C2=A0 User response was 50/50.=C2=A0 People ended up usi= ng discussions to discuss spec proposals, which could rightly be issues, an= d they still used issues to ask questions in issues.=C2=A0 The end result w= as to have both kinds of content in both areas.

This exp= erience has led me to decide against enabling discussions on my personal re= pos.=C2=A0 I figured it's just easier to have everything in one place i= f the majority of people aren't going to be using the feature.=C2=A0 An= d there's not really a good place to document which is for what kind of= discourse.

I think discussions and issues are bas= ically the same thing except that discussions has minimal support for threa= ds.

Something to consider.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 5:19 am, Tim Bray
<tbray@textu= ality.com> wrote:
--
JSONpath mailing list
JSONpath@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath
--0000000000004d938505da926636-- From nobody Sat Mar 19 06:42:04 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729753A1317 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58cAmTCrg_FT for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FBE3A1300 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KLMVp5NZ9zDCbv; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 14:41:54 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <664157934.251245.1647631153698@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 14:41:54 +0100 Cc: Tim Bray , Daniel P , jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 669390114.394477-267002cd4c9a763f6e4796c63b6824be Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <89D132CD-A6CC-4915-BAF6-15ABDB4986F3@tzi.org> References: <664157934.251245.1647631153698@mail.yahoo.com> To: Greg Dennis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] github discussions X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:42:03 -0000 On 2022-03-18, at 20:19, Greg Dennis = wrote: >=20 > We did this on the JSON Schema repo. User response was 50/50. People = ended up using discussions to discuss spec proposals, which could = rightly be issues, and they still used issues to ask questions in = issues. The end result was to have both kinds of content in both areas. My gut feeling was that exactly that would be happening here as well. As Glyn says, we already have a nice threaded discussion medium (the = mailing list), so let=E2=80=99s stick with that. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Wed Mar 30 07:29:49 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923EF3A07F1 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4w0hTXDmNOEi for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1209E3A07FB for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id bg10so41902110ejb.4 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=zmddk8ue/BOutHIsuGNXrVheOjjByzCmA8BHYLxOisE=; b=YZ0I6SNFiJFwbq2rK0aRVe+Rl0RtuLD9nujSppzdbaIvNWicEz3JnIhWXfmh0Yefnt tB6iodN/GCJFamCAivtT0V8r1TqM2qWwxLts6G+Au+iqAXzG9w8dtSVlCBOOxu+TiObY ezGtpBrWi2eZs07GaVe3YMvxHo/x4MFucqN7e6ArUHPmUv3Zswui+lxm5O0SgmgvnssZ KwakWOlInHxW6Tx7JRU5PoBEYL3G4QJToOLEmZNafuEIKGYFvrJb1yFWjZxIYeYcfYH4 HtzKbPT/H8m9CsXSN+XFjyfDnfugozMR7kF7cdxP5YZkBL4/Hn/pIVEGfX741A7cDyLR pMHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=zmddk8ue/BOutHIsuGNXrVheOjjByzCmA8BHYLxOisE=; b=k131XI61bhAELhvfa79SKY6CvXCcSQ7zwpIJz9KduQeMyMXliia4eO8RfOf55AUjSb XwwYeEGmWgU9AgwcsGl4iSDCH8TRP3E0sbU8X05JJMAJPPlAauIu3Pa8fisnbG7TKH9/ 2TiasxyvqTTKpaMgktpRJmQz9Y4YK/uYgm6zXc6QbbZjlg+KSQ1onbYHz3rFCCQp3wji sf7DTNkx67IpU8n79rLYAG1ki00qsICaThalTXC2PZT6wgUDboTgnT4TwGChjXs9SQRn LdMmYG3DZhrPfi4ajbjpVulo6MervW+UYz/5/fkSIpzY3AUAVDAiB79DfzBn6mYfRIez nirQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vHHZwZ52oJB5fI/LfGHDihfpcC/TFbikGZNTG/8hdSVVBaJY5 JS61J+oNOWh+eEWCnPTm8XS3zBNQu48= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzw/kozqwGFnKWmEp4UJobZ17tMhrLARQE/rxlknyX81E0NuwLY7hFpXaNpu6GCL1soSpK1yQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d93:b0:6db:ab5e:7e0b with SMTP id gt19-20020a1709072d9300b006dbab5e7e0bmr39950259ejc.262.1648650581018; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:984:65b0:2:b49f:869:5a19:e1c4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3-20020a1709067f8300b006ce051bf215sm8205786ejr.192.2022.03.30.07.29.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:29:40 -0700 (PDT) From: James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\)) Message-Id: <518DA0F1-3F32-440B-8ED1-7E9A0E64B936@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:29:39 +0200 To: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81) Archived-At: Subject: [Jsonpath] May 2022 interim meeting poll reminder X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:29:48 -0000 Folks, This is your reminder if you intend on attending our next interim = meeting in May to please signal your availability on the poll if you = haven't yet as at time of writing only one person has done so. https://doodle.com/meeting/organize/id/zbqXqV3a I will close the poll by the end of week. If the times in the poll = aren't suitable, please reply with suggested alternatives. Thanks James (the annoying) JSONPath co-chair=