From alexey.melnikov@isode.com Wed Apr 8 11:10:41 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11B83A6E6F for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:10:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.546 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rioNLVQ3iEeX for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E8A3A6AC9 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.2.158] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:11:45 +0100 Message-ID: <49DCE8C2.60709@isode.com> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:11:14 -0700 From: Alexey Melnikov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: ldap-dir@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lisa Dusseault Subject: [Ldap-dir] Proposal to add all LDAP Directorate members to Apps Review Team X-BeenThere: ldap-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:10:41 -0000 Folks, Lisa and I were discussing use of Apps Area Directorates and came to conclusion that the Apps Review Team (see ) is better for the area then the directorate. Here are some reasons: 1). apps review mailing list is more transparent - openness is good 2). member can learn from other reviewers - spreading knowledge is good. So, we would like to propose to add all existing LDAP Directorate members to the Apps Review Team. Can you please let Lisa and myself know if you are Ok with being added to the Apps Review Team. Also, if you think LDAP Directorate has a separate and useful purpose, please let us know as well. Alexey P.S. Lisa and I are still deciding what should happen to the LDAP Directorate. The mailing list is going to remain active for the time being. From Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com Wed Apr 8 18:16:55 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A5A3A6BD7 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:16:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.321, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvG80zdte+Zb for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572033A6A1D for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] ((unknown) [75.141.233.128]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:18:01 +0100 X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS Message-Id: From: Kurt Zeilenga To: Alexey Melnikov In-Reply-To: <49DCE8C2.60709@isode.com> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:17:56 -0700 References: <49DCE8C2.60709@isode.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lisa Dusseault , ldap-dir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ldap-dir] Proposal to add all LDAP Directorate members to Apps Review Team X-BeenThere: ldap-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:16:55 -0000 On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Folks, > Lisa and I were discussing use of Apps Area Directorates and came to > conclusion that the Apps Review Team (see >) is better for the area then the directorate. Here are some reasons: > 1). apps review mailing list is more transparent - openness is good > 2). member can learn from other reviewers - spreading knowledge is > good. > > So, we would like to propose to add all existing LDAP Directorate > members to the Apps Review Team. > Can you please let Lisa and myself know if you are Ok with being > added to the Apps Review Team. > > Also, if you think LDAP Directorate has a separate and useful > purpose, please let us know as well. I don't care much if the directorate fades away... > > P.S. Lisa and I are still deciding what should happen to the LDAP > Directorate. The mailing list is going to remain active for the time > being. Just don't kill the directory@apps.ietf.org list as that's the LDAP parameters "Expert Review" list [RFC 4520]. -- Kurt From alexey.melnikov@isode.com Thu Apr 9 08:16:20 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C85F3A6BDA for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WG0+PwWRRyrc for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8A53A682A for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.124] ((unknown) [62.3.217.253]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:17:26 +0100 X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS Message-ID: <49DE1170.3010709@isode.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:17:04 +0100 From: Alexey Melnikov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Kurt Zeilenga References: <49DCE8C2.60709@isode.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lisa Dusseault , ldap-dir@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ldap-dir] Proposal to add all LDAP Directorate members to Apps Review Team X-BeenThere: ldap-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:16:20 -0000 Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >> P.S. Lisa and I are still deciding what should happen to the LDAP >> Directorate. The mailing list is going to remain active for the time >> being. > > Just don't kill the directory@apps.ietf.org list as that's the LDAP > parameters "Expert Review" list [RFC 4520]. No intention of doing that. From leifj@it.su.se Sat Apr 11 06:31:01 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ldap-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE6D3A6E38 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:31:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.467 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.218, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z--dc1ikcv8A for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.su.se (smtp2.su.se [130.237.164.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E933A6E18 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F8781A63; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:32:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at av-in.su.se Received: from smtp.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Am5KZZcZGqj3; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from k2.mnt.se (ua-83-227-179-169.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.179.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8222581ABE; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:32:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Johansson To: ldap-dir@ietf.org Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:32:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.4 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.1.4; i686; ; ) References: <49DCE8C2.60709@isode.com> <49DE1170.3010709@isode.com> In-Reply-To: <49DE1170.3010709@isode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3729501.OGOqd6QnY0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200904111532.06975.leifj@it.su.se> Cc: Kurt Zeilenga , Lisa Dusseault Subject: Re: [Ldap-dir] Proposal to add all LDAP Directorate members to Apps Review Team X-BeenThere: ldap-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: LDAP Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:31:01 -0000 --nextPart3729501.OGOqd6QnY0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 09 April 2009 17:17:04 Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > >> P.S. Lisa and I are still deciding what should happen to the LDAP > >> Directorate. The mailing list is going to remain active for the time > >> being. > > > > Just don't kill the directory@apps.ietf.org list as that's the LDAP > > parameters "Expert Review" list [RFC 4520]. > > No intention of doing that. I agree with Kurt. --nextPart3729501.OGOqd6QnY0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkngm9YACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndvmQCgj7/fMAtzqktmej1ih29ZwNTA X+UAn2BBWcMvIrX8Bha06kHmrylF+muH =+ktR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3729501.OGOqd6QnY0--