Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt

From: Dino Farinacci <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:49:34 -0800

Reminder, the deadline for comments is tomorrow for draft-ietf- 
lisp-10.txt, I plan to post if there are no comments. Here is a new  
update.

Dino

On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:

> Here are some minor changes to the main LISP draft. We believe the  
> security-bit is general enough to adopt any security scheme. But  
> Fabio et al should be publishing a security draft by the end of this  
> week or early next week to propose a way of signing Map-Replies.
>
> Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt:
>
>   o  Posted March 2011.
>
>   o  Add p-bit to Map-Request so there is documentary reasons to know
>      when a PITR has sent a Map-Request to an ETR.
>
>   o  Add Map-Notify message which is used to acknowledge a Map- 
> Register
>      message sent to a Map-Server.
>
>   o  Add M-bit to the Map-Register message so an ETR that wants an
>      acknowledgment for the Map-Register can request one.
>
>   o  Add S-bit to the ECM and Map-Reply messages to describe security
>      data that can be present in each message.  Then refer to
>      [LISP-SEC] for expansive details.
>
>   o  Add Network Management Considerations section and point to the  
> MIB
>      and LIG drafts.
>
>   o  Remove the word "simple" per Yakov's comments.
>
> We'd like to give a 10 day review period so we can post a new  
> version, if there are no objections, on March 4th.
>
> Find enclosed a diff file and a text draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Dino/Vince/Darrel/Dave
>
> <rfcdiff-lisp-09-to-10.html>
>
>
> <draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt>
>
>
>