Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01

From: Luigi Iannone <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 22:00:14 +0200

HI All,

the extended call for adoption for this document is now over.
From the replies received we can conclude that the WG does think that: 

1) It is worth creating a registry for LISP type messages.

2) One entry should be reserved for Experimentation purposes.

Hence, there is consensus in adopting the document as WG document.
The authors are invited to submit a new version of the document with name draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-00.txt.
Such document should include all comments received so far.

Thanks you all  

ciao

Luigi 
Joel

> On 15 Jul 2016, at 13:56, Luigi Iannone <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> His All,
> 
> the chairs have review the WG discussion during the adoption call.  
> 
> We are concerned by the low level of support.  
> We also observed significant discussion around the experimental allocation.  
> So we are re-issuing and clarifying the call, to finish one week afte rthe end of IETF 96. 
> 
> Please comment on two separate issues:
> 
> 1) Do you think we should create a registry for LISP message types
> 
> 2) If yes to (1), do you think that registry should include reserving an entry for Experimentation?
> 
> As indicated in the first mail silence does not indicate support, please respond to the call.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Joel
> Luigi
> 
> On 28 Jun 2016, at 11:37, Luigi Iannone <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> The chairs received a request for the following document to be
>> adopted as a WG item:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-lisp-type-iana-01>
>> 
>> Here starts a 14 day call for adoption, this call will end on
>> Tuesday the 12th July, 2016.
>> 
>> Please email the WG list stating whether or not you support acceptance.
>> 
>> If you email to support the acceptance of this document as a WG item, please
>> also indicate if you are able and willing to either contribute to, or review, (or both) the draft.
>> 
>> Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately.
>> 
>> 
>> The Chairs
>> Joel & Luigi
>> 
>