Subject: Re: [MSEC] GSAKMP issue 16: allow other signature types besides DSA?

From: Uri Meth <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:26:25 -0400

Yes, this will be allowed in that RSA and other types can be registered
with IANA when necessary.

BTW< we are still in the process of getting IANA registration of values
which will facilitate this addition.

UM

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:39:55PM -0400, George Gross wrote:
> 
> GSAKMP issue 16
> 
> Section and relevant text passage:
> 
> 6.8 Signature Payload table 14
> 
> Comment/issue description:
> 
> Would it be reasonable to allow RSA signature as an optional signature type?
> 
> Suggested issue resolution:
> 
> Leave DSS as the mandatory to implement, add RSA (would need to add
> informative refs to PKCS specs too I'd guess).
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> msec mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/msec

-- 
Uri Meth                            (410) 872 - 1515 x233 (voice)
SPARTA, Inc.                        (410) 872 - 8079      (fax)
7075 Samuel Morse Drive             [email-masked]
Columbia, MD 21046

_______________________________________________
msec mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/msec