Subject: RE: [MSEC] Why the rsa-signatures draft doesn't explicitly dealwithPKI issues

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:33:10 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked]
> [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of ext 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:23 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [MSEC] Why the rsa-signatures draft doesn't explicitly
> dealwithPKI issues
>
>
> 	* How do we provide an option (not mandated) in IPsec protocols
> 	  to provide non-repudiation? I had suggested a way using 
> 	  transitive-non-repudiation using the non-repudiated optional
> 	  IKE communication. Something to convey to the IPsec working 
> 	  group. Not an MSEC WG item.

May be I will write an I-D on this for IPsec WG.
_______________________________________________
msec mailing list
[email-masked]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/msec