Subject: Re: [netmod] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs-00.txt

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:36:57 +0000

In case folks missed it, Appendix A (pasted below for convenience) roughly
describes where each requirement came from.  As it says, some liberty was
taken to adjust the text based on what looked liked consensus from on list
discussions; this is why they're not 1-1.  Regardless if our
interpretation is accurate, we will iterate this draft to consensus
(closing GitHub issues).

   Appendix A.  Relation to Requirements in Other Drafts

   The requirements in this document roughly map onto the requirements
   listed in [draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01] and
   [draft-openconfig-netmod-model-structure-00] as list below.  Some
   liberty was taken to adjust the requirements based on what looked
   liked consensus from on list discussions:

   1.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 3
   2.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 4.1
   3.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 4.2
   4.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 4.3
   5.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 4.4
   6.  draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Section 4.5
   7.  draft-openconfig-netmod-model-structure-00 (no section)

Kent

On 9/11/15, 6:16 PM, "Kent Watsen" <[email-masked]> wrote:

>
>The AD and chairs thought it best to formalize the consensus on the
>requirements a bit more.  So we created the I-D listed below to track and
>capture final consensus.
>
>Additionally, we want to use this GitHub issue tracker to track issues:
>
>	https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues
>
>Consistent with Tom's earlier email, we want to collect any issues with
>these requirements before EOB Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5PM EST.  If
>you have an issue, in addition to posting it to the list, please consider
>adding it to the GitHub tracker, and let people know you did so.   Our
>goal is to close the issues as quickly as possible, some will go to DEAD
>while others may remain OPEN, based on WG consensus.
>
>Thanks,
>Kent & Tom
>
>
>On 9/11/15, 5:36 PM, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs-00.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Kent Watsen and posted to the
>>IETF repository.
>>
>>Name:		draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs
>>Revision:	00
>>Title:		NETMOD Operational State Requirements
>>Document date:	2015-09-11
>>Group:		Individual Submission
>>Pages:		5
>>URL:            
>>https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs-00.
>>t
>>xt
>>Status:         
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs/
>>Htmlized:       
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs-00
>>
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   This document captures consensus on operational state requirements by
>>   the NETMOD working group.
>>
>>                 
>>        
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>The IETF Secretariat
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod