Return-Path: <owner-nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Received: by mumm.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.9.3/8.9.0) id BAA27393 for nmrg-outgoing; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:44:41 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mta3n.bluewin.ch (mta3n.bluewin.ch [195.186.1.212]) by mumm.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA27389 for <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:44:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: from ieee.org (62.202.51.75) by mta3n.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 6.0.039) id 3C234FE800008B6E for nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:43:33 +0100
Message-ID: <3C23D743.6050908@ieee.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:43:47 +0100
From: "J.P. Martin-Flatin" <jp.martin-flatin@ieee.org>
Reply-To: "J.P. Martin-Flatin" <jp.martin-flatin@ieee.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011011
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IRTF Network Management Research Group <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Subject: [nmrg] SNMP over TCP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I lost track of the SNMP over TCP proposal when the discussions moved to 
the IETF SNMPv3 Working Group. What is the current status? Has it been 
submitted to the IETF for publication as an informational or experimental 
RFC? Internet-Draft <draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-tcp-06.txt> has now expired. 
Should we renew it?

JP