Subject: Re: [payload] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-04

From: Ben Campbell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 18:24:32 -0500

Hi,

Version 05 fixes most of my concerns, but does not appear to have captured the change discussed below. However, I think it’s in good enough shape for IETF last call. I will request that shortly, and the below change can be addressed along with any last call feedback.

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Ben Campbell <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> ??4.4: ??? If a Sequence intended for tranmission does not conform to these restrictions then it MAY be possible to simply convert it???"
>>> 
>>> This seems like a statement of fact rather than a grant of permission. As such, it should not use the 2119 keyword.
>> 
>> Yes, how about:
>> 
>> ???Informative note: Some streams which do not meet these restrictions can be converted into streams which do without the need to reencode the encoded data simply by adjusting the distribution of slices into fragments, others cannot.???
> 
> Works for me.