From nobody Tue Jan 31 01:16:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCD31298CA for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vR25oMeRv98E for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A381204D9 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EF2A2804B3 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0D2803B9 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E5B38004 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 746BC40018; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:16:43 +0100 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: perpass@ietf.org Message-ID: <20170131091643.iax2oiyiisozppsl@nic.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5gudsnxlhz6kgbm2" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0 X-Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 x86_64 X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie Organization: NIC France X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/ User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) Archived-At: Subject: [perpass] [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC] X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:16:51 -0000 --5gudsnxlhz6kgbm2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Read and comment! --5gudsnxlhz6kgbm2 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org Received: from hebe.prod-int.prive.th3.nic.fr [10.1.81.80] by b12.tech.prive.nic.fr with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.26) for (single-drop); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:47:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from hebe.prod-int.prive.th3.nic.fr (LHLO zimbra.afnic.fr) (10.1.81.80) by zimbra.afnic.fr with LMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.afnic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479FA9040B1 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:52 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.668 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.668 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: zimbra.afnic.fr (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from zimbra.afnic.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.afnic.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id z47lCg5vPNkP for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.afnic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0379040AF for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.afnic.fr Received: from zimbra.afnic.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.afnic.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AIo9TS-Xab9Q for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by zimbra.afnic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23F49040AE for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) id CD9A14C002A; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: bortzmeyer@nic.fr Received: from mx5.nic.fr (mx5.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:13]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31FC4C000F; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx5.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C1AF23003C7; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1137) id 94EC13003D2; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [4.31.198.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx5.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6838D3003C7; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B5F1295C7; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:46:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1485279972; bh=yNXE8g540tklHq2dRQaRYAjLsLEraBVDOe+cthJm2KU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=S9uzGTaMSrA9+A5xtWtkTERHKw4ns0bfxMZ9W+MNTgVweAktimvK9YEMyGtNSjutu B2/eqxlZql4sksJSDC2+XfzBfVykByNX8azQaRdDVYo71GDslCG9L6wVlqEkcC53pA YgwmLrwBl9G4FxJuZtl9hP2xPcx+7TSOysxE1cpA= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA4B1294D8; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:46:07 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Old-From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" Old-Subject: Last Call: (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148527996733.12573.15522530300481191993.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:46:07 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org Sender: "IETF-Announce" X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.1.24.173917 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' REPLYTO_FROM_DIFF_ADDY 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1300_1399 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, DKIM_SIGNATURE 0, FROM_SAME_AS_TO_DOMAIN 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MULTIPLE_REAL_RCPTS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_ANY_CC1 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_ANY_TO1 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_IN_RCPT 0, __FROM_SAME_AS_TO_DOMAIN 0, __HAS_CC_HDR 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_LIST_HEADER 0, __HAS_LIST_HELP 0, __HAS_LIST_SUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __URI_WITH_PATH 0' X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Subject: Last Call: (Design considerations for Metadata Insertion) to Informational RFC From: The IESG The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Design considerations for Metadata Insertion' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The IAB has published [RFC7624] in response to several revelations of pervasive attack on Internet communications. This document considers the implications of protocol designs which associate metadata with encrypted flows. In particular, it asserts that designs which do so by explicit actions of the end system are preferable to designs in which middleboxes insert them. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. There are some minor nits noted by I-D nits that we'll fix as we go. --5gudsnxlhz6kgbm2--