From nobody Sun Mar  2 14:06:37 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8921A0B52 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  2 Mar 2014 14:06:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3rciijdx6aj for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  2 Mar 2014 14:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DEE1A0B51 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  2 Mar 2014 14:06:32 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s22M6TMt003457 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:06:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s22M6DLl008374 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:06:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s22M6C8g009167 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140302220612.GA9165@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/53G7hzn208Yy_Kk91nI5BeVc5Tc
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:06:35 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested::External Party>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-03              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested::External Party>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-01Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	


From nobody Tue Mar  4 01:08:28 2014
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51A81A03CD for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:08:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsBObQxAVKR5 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F27F1A0414 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF320554433; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 04:12:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB65EF572; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 04:08:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 04:08:19 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 04:03:19 -0500
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
Thread-Index: Ac8r1VDvXsrepqdITFOEgu9tRQdhxALs0S6L
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B6916A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8BC5B9B7A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>,  <5301F593.90909@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5301F593.90909@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/I-1mPnMCnyzI-ktL2Ao4uQzK_j4
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:08:27 -0000

Hi Benoit,

I think you sent a message that the pm-dir meeting would be in Hilton Meeti=
ng Rooms 1 - 4

However, at the moment I can't find the message, as I'm trying to send a re=
minder to
the pm-dir list, so......

This is a reminder for the meeting, and Benoit will hopefully remind me/us =
where it will
be located ( thanks!).

see you at 1300,
Al
________________________________________
From: Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:42 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89

....
> I would like to propose a brief meeting of pm-dir at IETF-89,
> primarily to discuss membership review and any topics members
> would like to raise.
>
> 1300-1400 GMT  Tuesday Afternoon Session I
>
> I note that IPFIX has been cancelled, and perhaps we could
> use that meeting space or an alternate space.
> In any case, let's meet at IETF registration at 1300
> and go from there.

Good initiative Al.
I booked the IESG breakout room (room TBD) for this.

Regards, Benoit


From nobody Tue Mar  4 01:12:55 2014
Return-Path: <aakhter@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D121A0413 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:12:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Gt193m5PFN9 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D931A0414 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 01:12:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1585; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393924359; x=1395133959; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=JOWc9XUOspA78Xkly+UYbkuVQn/ydYq3l/oYcCB1vLI=; b=TBOQTul+jlFeYXRfgrwYatZvfn1/J+aRHg4wXU/xXe1HxRY81sPDWro8 UlTmdJay3MRd/ldNkJgnVvc43ZGJ/LT1xVuwVoOUwdGKb3iyzkSWgD4P2 FGUWs2ttU74NyvsOFPQOc60H9hlPLgAgweL9ymWkY3o0dpJJBHXnJrgpz o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFAHWYFVOtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABagwY7V8BsgR8WdIIlAQEBBAEBATc0FwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAQEEARIIh3ENzCMTBI4gOAaDHoEUBKpngy2BaAQ+
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,583,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="24732941"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2014 09:12:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s249Ccl3010156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:12:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.9]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 03:12:38 -0600
From: "Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
Thread-Index: Ac8r1VDvXsrepqdITFOEgu9tRQdhxALs0S6LAABMtBA=
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:12:38 +0000
Message-ID: <75C0E47A1889264493A2DCB2869AC09633C35C50@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8BC5B9B7A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>,  <5301F593.90909@cisco.com> <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B6916A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B6916A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.81.8.194]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/g-BfKAiSst7BtGE1bi4_OTQYrhY
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:12:45 -0000

Are these the same room?

* Hilton Meeting Rooms 1 - 4
* IESG breakout room (room TBD) for this.



-----Original Message-----
From: pm-dir [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C=
 (AL)
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 4:03 AM
To: Benoit Claise (bclaise); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89

Hi Benoit,

I think you sent a message that the pm-dir meeting would be in Hilton Meeti=
ng Rooms 1 - 4

However, at the moment I can't find the message, as I'm trying to send a re=
minder to the pm-dir list, so......

This is a reminder for the meeting, and Benoit will hopefully remind me/us =
where it will be located ( thanks!).

see you at 1300,
Al
________________________________________
From: Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:42 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89

....
> I would like to propose a brief meeting of pm-dir at IETF-89,=20
> primarily to discuss membership review and any topics members would=20
> like to raise.
>
> 1300-1400 GMT  Tuesday Afternoon Session I
>
> I note that IPFIX has been cancelled, and perhaps we could use that=20
> meeting space or an alternate space.
> In any case, let's meet at IETF registration at 1300 and go from=20
> there.

Good initiative Al.
I booked the IESG breakout room (room TBD) for this.

Regards, Benoit

_______________________________________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir


From nobody Tue Mar  4 02:13:10 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B931A03FC for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 02:13:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqBjYlKsqAIz for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 02:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A991A0493 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 02:13:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1773; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393927983; x=1395137583; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O+Cp9X0WTM7YUSQGNOfAm9Eh++IkR8pHU+f4peF0nyk=; b=ipIim0G3W4uDQbSSrTJJTaJI4jKohuvR8Omso7ttBeeWvi4mz0bgTT0/ d/k1M0TG4M3Pf0unCzBZPa0qgUj6xEsHjaMpYTHt1VZn+50Itts0WUtdF vgoID7UWZzY4q3OuXp20E151hHFeaEXU9wDTlqcCQcyDYQSsx4uPYtdhC k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,583,1389744000";  d="scan'208";a="6416135"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2014 10:13:02 +0000
Received: from [10.61.221.123] ([10.61.221.123]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s24AD1Ci001187; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:13:01 GMT
Message-ID: <5315A72D.2000503@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:13:01 +0000
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Aamer Akhter (aakhter)" <aakhter@cisco.com>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8BC5B9B7A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>,  <5301F593.90909@cisco.com> <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B6916A@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> <75C0E47A1889264493A2DCB2869AC09633C35C50@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <75C0E47A1889264493A2DCB2869AC09633C35C50@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/segDw0IXb00gGARJOQ2hMH-oEsI
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:13:08 -0000

Dear all,

The room has changed.
Location: Victoria (East Wing, Mezzanine Meeting Rooms)

See you at 1PM

Regards, Benoit
> Are these the same room?
>
> * Hilton Meeting Rooms 1 - 4
> * IESG breakout room (room TBD) for this.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pm-dir [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 4:03 AM
> To: Benoit Claise (bclaise); pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
>
> Hi Benoit,
>
> I think you sent a message that the pm-dir meeting would be in Hilton Meeting Rooms 1 - 4
>
> However, at the moment I can't find the message, as I'm trying to send a reminder to the pm-dir list, so......
>
> This is a reminder for the meeting, and Benoit will hopefully remind me/us where it will be located ( thanks!).
>
> see you at 1300,
> Al
> ________________________________________
> From: Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:42 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pm-dir] pm-dir meeting at IETF-89
>
> ....
>> I would like to propose a brief meeting of pm-dir at IETF-89,
>> primarily to discuss membership review and any topics members would
>> like to raise.
>>
>> 1300-1400 GMT  Tuesday Afternoon Session I
>>
>> I note that IPFIX has been cancelled, and perhaps we could use that
>> meeting space or an alternate space.
>> In any case, let's meet at IETF registration at 1300 and go from
>> there.
> Good initiative Al.
> I booked the IESG breakout room (room TBD) for this.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
> _______________________________________________
> pm-dir mailing list
> pm-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
> .
>


From nobody Tue Mar  4 05:11:46 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB9A1A0100 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:11:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xh4RnFagfwCz for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A181A0058 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:11:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=127; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393938700; x=1395148300; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=AjvvwTKmdBwWLGnSswB1XHPm0ouUM9r9yCkPGBYXd8Y=; b=OKFoEirQAEbqnPVhpV+6F8uCQFVAeu2cEKqZ5sNdzkGLeg0KDKgjqvAA p+k6JAe3xZmk5KDKBsAnAlWLVclzWv6ZKOxwUk09qFZaQtfsiT+m36Wi7 0ucJ/HMW7xL1oZV+7ZXj2Qkn/H+e2szQf38V7aQevk+xVB7inPKWviEOe g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAMTPFVOQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABagwY7jUG1JBZ0gmRAPRYYAwIBAgFLDQgBAYd1DZ0CrzsTBJMQBJg8hkqLYYMtPA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,584,1389744000";  d="scan'208";a="2349951"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2014 13:11:39 +0000
Received: from [10.61.79.117] (ams3-vpn-dhcp3957.cisco.com [10.61.79.117]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s24DBc9Z028925 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:11:39 GMT
Message-ID: <5315D10A.9010708@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:11:38 +0000
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/l2_iTqnsrpUAb6hs9lfe_BoAMr0
Subject: [pm-dir] URL to google doc
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:11:44 -0000

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=sharing#gid=0

Regards, Benoit


From nobody Tue Mar  4 05:56:01 2014
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6734B1A011E for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:55:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csW4bh4ZcZnF for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:55:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388731A012B for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 05:55:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF9155451C for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 09:00:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.243]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2022F0374 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 08:55:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 08:55:53 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 08:55:47 -0500
Thread-Topic: Meeting notes at IETF-89 (very brief, but prompt)
Thread-Index: AQHPN7FxcvpCJT8Txky5eq4GnIr4bw==
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B69171@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Fappxhh45S6R3CHrsmUsegDVR8E
Subject: [pm-dir] Meeting notes at IETF-89 (very brief, but prompt)
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:55:59 -0000

PM-dir meeting  March 4, 2014

volunteer reviews are in good shape.
new opportunities for review in March.
All will send Script with Diffs to Benoit.
Add google share drive to PM-DIR web page

membership,=20
   suggest new candidates among people we know
   let them perform a review with experienced mentor oversight
   add member or tutor further.

compile a list of performance metrics - across all SDOs
implement as a wiki
"the following terms are being defined in=85"

In reviews, include Guidance on metric content, possible overlap,
"does this make sense?"=20
but must be part of early review.=


From nobody Tue Mar  4 06:09:01 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282E91A0229 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 06:08:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.048
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEkiD06JtJb5 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 06:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C6C1A020A for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 06:08:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=960; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393942126; x=1395151726; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0OvpLxQ2sOWeSS6gjoDn1Ggv5Q0ht3bLn+r+kk85QzQ=; b=IaNC7svjN2qVFXwqOmKzxzcPIBUNMuPrwO7zAdlwf8y/rvwste3+xrxb a0btZQGmKCNggJseie68H3CvadatyodSrXyvPT7Uj9vvRgtwoXtvt3HkM w3y1AiHcQdpeqIp9O3FosGlejFuVmlIQmJOcLff9/AKNSuvjq21BTh0cY 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFANjdFVOQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABagwY7wUaBHRZ0giYBAQQBAQEvAQU2ChELIRYPCQMCAQIBFTAGAQwGAgEBBYdwDcxTF45YhDgBA4xpi1OGSnyKZYMtPA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,585,1389744000";  d="scan'208";a="2357439"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2014 14:08:45 +0000
Received: from [10.61.79.117] (ams3-vpn-dhcp3957.cisco.com [10.61.79.117]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s24E8jH5024930; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:08:45 GMT
Message-ID: <5315DE6C.3070109@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:08:44 +0000
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B69171@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80176B69171@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/eyiciEd42W1UshCSDYpjr7GEHkM
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Meeting notes at IETF-89 (very brief, but prompt)
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:08:52 -0000

Hi,

http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/performance-metrics.html updated with:
     - google doc link
     - one name removed from the list.

Regards, Benoit
> PM-dir meeting  March 4, 2014
>
> volunteer reviews are in good shape.
> new opportunities for review in March.
> All will send Script with Diffs to Benoit.
> Add google share drive to PM-DIR web page
>
> membership,
>     suggest new candidates among people we know
>     let them perform a review with experienced mentor oversight
>     add member or tutor further.
>
> compile a list of performance metrics - across all SDOs
> implement as a wiki
> "the following terms are being defined in…"
>
> In reviews, include Guidance on metric content, possible overlap,
> "does this make sense?"
> but must be part of early review.
> _______________________________________________
> pm-dir mailing list
> pm-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>


From nobody Tue Mar  4 10:09:48 2014
Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3016B1A01DD for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:09:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.135
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.135 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ih29Dl0d4bBx for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rad.co.il (mailrelay01-ib2.rad.com [91.143.228.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638861A02BA for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MailRelay01 (envelope-from yaakov?s@rad.com) with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Mar 2014 20:07:37 +0200
Received: from EXRAD6.ad.rad.co.il (2002:c072:18be::c072:18be) by exrad6.ad.rad.co.il (2002:c072:18be::c072:18be) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.38; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:09:26 +0200
Received: from EXRAD6.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::f157:6202:5fc8:a4f0]) by exrad6.ad.rad.co.il ([fe80::f157:6202:5fc8:a4f0%12]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.031; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:09:26 +0200
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: performance metrics in AQM
Thread-Index: Ac831OAp2NHffneCSOyTLbk64bkW7g==
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:09:26 +0000
Message-ID: <f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212@exrad6.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [94.188.160.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212exrad6adradcoil_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Commtouch-Refid: str=0001.0A090203.531616DA.014E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 (Unknown)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/pB36-0nibaPD-qUfA8eBbFI0gcM
Subject: [pm-dir] performance metrics in AQM
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 18:09:41 -0000

--_000_f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212exrad6adradcoil_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I could not attend AQM today due to a clash with PWE3,
but from what I heard much of the discussion was about performance metrics.

Many of the metrics are phrased quite differently from what we are used to.
For example, draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-00 talks about :
Queue related metrics

    link utilization, the queuing delay and size,  AQM-induced packet losse=
s (voluntary drops caused by AQM scheme and  buffer overflow),

End to end metrics
  flow completion time, packet loss, goodput, latency and jitter, QoE metri=
cs.

I intend to follow this work, and will attempt to cause them to reference I=
PPM definitions as much as possible.



Y(J)S


--_000_f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212exrad6adradcoil_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
h4
	{mso-style-priority:9;
	mso-style-link:"Heading 4 Char";
	mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
	margin-right:0in;
	mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
	margin-left:0in;
	mso-line-height-alt:0pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
pre
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
	margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
	{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
	font-family:"Courier New";}
span.Heading4Char
	{mso-style-name:"Heading 4 Char";
	mso-style-priority:9;
	mso-style-link:"Heading 4";
	font-family:"Courier New";
	font-weight:bold;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Hi all, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">I could not attend AQM today due to a clash with PWE=
3, <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">but from what I heard much of the discussion was abo=
ut performance metrics.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Many of the metrics are phrased quite differently fr=
om what we are used to.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">For example, draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-00 talks=
 about :<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Queue related metrics<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style=3D"page-break-before:always"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;fon=
t-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; lin=
k utilization, the queuing delay and size, &nbsp;AQM-induced packet losses =
(voluntary drops caused by AQM scheme and &nbsp;buffer overflow),<o:p></o:p=
></span></pre>
<pre style=3D"page-break-before:always"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;fon=
t-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">End to end metrics<o:p=
></o:p></span></pre>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"page-break-before:always">&nbsp; flow compl=
etion time, packet loss, goodput, latency and jitter, QoE metrics.<o:p></o:=
p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"page-break-before:always"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>=
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"page-break-before:always">I intend to follo=
w this work, and will attempt to cause them to reference IPPM definitions a=
s much as possible.<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style=3D"page-break-before:always"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font-siz=
e:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><o:p>&nbsp=
;</o:p></span></pre>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Y(J)S<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212exrad6adradcoil_--


From nobody Tue Mar  4 10:26:26 2014
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6D01A025E for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3sP6NXWwxOk for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:26:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA0B1A028F for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-255-15.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ED9554556; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 13:30:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.242]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5F8E2356; Tue,  4 Mar 2014 13:25:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:26:15 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:23:16 -0500
Thread-Topic: performance metrics in AQM
Thread-Index: Ac831OAp2NHffneCSOyTLbk64bkW7gAAe+N/
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80178E0CCA4@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
References: <f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212@exrad6.ad.rad.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <f0de5041c23d481792fca13a8e7e7212@exrad6.ad.rad.co.il>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/P5SiBPmqsVQPlrdLcpTnzaQTWI8
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] performance metrics in AQM
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 18:26:24 -0000

IMO, this work is closer to what we have done and/or intended to do
in BMWG.  I was in the AQM session, and I made the connection with BMWG.

Also, I have the impression they need to step back and decide what they
want to know and accomplish, without identifying every possible metric
(some which not be measureable reliably, as Scott Bradner pointed out).

Al
________________________________________
From: pm-dir [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yaakov Stein [yaakov_s@=
rad.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:09 PM
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: [pm-dir] performance metrics in AQM

Hi all,

I could not attend AQM today due to a clash with PWE3,
but from what I heard much of the discussion was about performance metrics.

Many of the metrics are phrased quite differently from what we are used to.
For example, draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-00 talks about :
Queue related metrics

    link utilization, the queuing delay and size,  AQM-induced packet losse=
s (voluntary drops caused by AQM scheme and  buffer overflow),

End to end metrics
  flow completion time, packet loss, goodput, latency and jitter, QoE metri=
cs.

I intend to follow this work, and will attempt to cause them to reference I=
PPM definitions as much as possible.



Y(J)S


From nobody Sun Mar  9 15:06:52 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3A1A0247 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  9 Mar 2014 15:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWdCQqlJhgQC for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  9 Mar 2014 15:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431EC1A017E for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  9 Mar 2014 15:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s29M6h0u002009 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:06:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s29M6Q4T009912 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:06:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s29M6987027431 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:06:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 23:06:09 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140309220609.GA27429@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Rpbkii2mr6pmJB723CXAk-hizec
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 22:06:51 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	


From nobody Sun Mar 16 15:06:44 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519C21A01A0 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcIfVTlmct8T for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1081A0139 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2GM6UYs001953 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:06:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2GM6CEo016122 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:06:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s2GM6Cnn025370 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140316220612.GA25368@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/YCctZiSRHjqU99VdgTutFsYRQM4
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:06:42 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	


From nobody Wed Mar 19 11:39:04 2014
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1271A06FD for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVTOv0G6JKQy for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6E11A071A for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104625541B7 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.242]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEC0E1EE1 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:38:50 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:38:48 -0400
Thread-Topic: pm-dir diffs
Thread-Index: Ac9DnOJz/c93QRbuQZ2ybcI0NdeScwAA9cfg
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8017910CE13@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
References: <890scsR6Z2800S05.1395251905@web05.cms.usa.net>
In-Reply-To: <890scsR6Z2800S05.1395251905@web05.cms.usa.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/iLsoqHeNQs-JNJTk4d6BDOvMK4Y
Subject: [pm-dir] FW: pm-dir diffs
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:39:02 -0000

pm-dir,

I promised another diff run at our face2face meeting,
see below.

A Quick Summary:

Dan - the nvo3 framework draft is not finished yet, could still be reviewed=
.
    - the good news for you in that -rtgwg-cl-framework has expired.

Brian - rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active, could still be reviewed.

otherwise, I think we are up to date within our scope of review.
you can always see our current review status here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJv=
VUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=3Dsharing

Al
pm-dir admin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Morton [mailto:acmacm@usa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:58 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Subject: pm-dir diffs
>=20
> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$ cat diff.txt
> Diffs from Last Time -=3Dold, +=3Dnew
> --------------------
> --- pmol-old-content.txt	2014-01-20 09:48:24.292917746 -0500
> +++ pmol-uniq-content.txt	2014-03-19 13:54:06.282614615 -0400
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> -draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active
> -draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active
> +draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active
> +draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active
> +draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active
> @@ -4,3 +5,3 @@
> -draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active
> -draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active
> -draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active
> +draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-02                    Active
> +draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active
> +draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active
> @@ -8,6 +9,6 @@
> -draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
> -draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
> -draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-00           Active
> -draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-04                      Active
> -draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-12                 Active
> -draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-02              Active
> +draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
> +draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active
> +draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active
> +draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
> +draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14                 In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
> +draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active
> @@ -16,8 +17,8 @@
> -draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-11                    Active
> -draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-01Active
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-09        Active
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-00Active
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-00    Active
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13                 In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <Waiting for Writeup>
> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-07     Active
> +draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active
> +draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing -
> ID
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-10        In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <In Last Call>
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - I=
D
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$


From nobody Sun Mar 23 02:35:39 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992C91A6F4D; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.811
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qp1UI8XSnxmE; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1E31A093B; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9487; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1395567326; x=1396776926; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/CGH2bxewU8GHaYv8s94iBd1OhJlMaD15CFV8C0TN0s=; b=iaGanrScMdmqBt+nTNslxq+npvyp1QKIFLlq41Fz31Pk1rxGWho1jq5c wy3nPBuk0eBmJaH86IfQ9JM4BE3ZtFrmGXOsblBzr/A4KIOoRCCo8p7FA o3EmwmQ1lW5RVa5KM3R3JFDjlGyksAmiIjIht4RwFmgu3Ydzwrq3UH6Oe w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFACSqLlOQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABYgwY7w0WBDhZ0giUBAQEEOEANBB0PFg8JAwIBAgE3DgYBDAYCAQGHdQ3NRhePAYQ4BJhKgTKFGotlgy48
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,713,1389744000";  d="scan'208";a="6039961"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2014 09:35:24 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2N9ZL0B012555; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:35:22 GMT
Message-ID: <532EAAD9.7080306@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:35:21 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
References: <20140320224110.21951.63897.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140320224110.21951.63897.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140320224110.21951.63897.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/McqAP0dlhDCkQGador3TdGjp5BQ
Subject: [pm-dir] Summarized Agenda for the 2014-03-27 IESG Teleconference
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:35:27 -0000

Dear all,

Please find below the agenda of the Mar 27th IESG telechat.
Please send your questions, comments, and concerns before Mar 26th COB.

Thanks and Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------

INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the 2014-03-27 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 2014-03-20 15:39:19 PDT
Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/



2. Protocol Actions
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14  - IETF stream
     A Mechanism for Transporting User to User Call Control Information
     in SIP (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Alissa Cooper
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-storm-rdmap-ext-09  - IETF stream
     RDMA Protocol Extensions (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Martin Stiemerling
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-10  - IETF stream
     Definition of Managed Objects for the Manet Simplified Multicast
     Framework Relay Set Process (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Stan Ratliff (sratliff@cisco.com) is the document shepherd
     Token: Adrian Farrel
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-13  - IETF stream
     A YANG Data Model for IP Management (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> is the document
     shepherd.
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-11  - IETF stream
     LDP Extensions for Multi Topology (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> is the document shepherd
     Token: Adrian Farrel
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-20  - IETF stream
     TCP Extensions for High Performance (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Martin Stiemerling
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-13  - IETF stream
     A YANG Data Model for System Management (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09  - IETF stream
     jCal: The JSON format for iCalendar (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Pete Resnick
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-06  - IETF stream
     Handling Unknown DHCPv6 Messages (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-11  - IETF stream
     RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-appsawg-rrvs-header-field-08  - IETF stream
     The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service
     Extension (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-06  - IETF stream
     Allocating and Retiring Special Purpose MPLS Labels (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Alia Atlas
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-03  - IETF stream
     MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the
     Operational Expectations of SDH, OTN and Ethernet Transport Network
     Operators (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Adrian Farrel
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-11  - IETF stream
     Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: IANA - Review Needed
     Consensus: Unknown
     Last call expires: 2014-03-24

   o draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09  - IETF stream
     XML Media Types (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Barry Leiba
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

2.1.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp-15  - IETF stream
     Inter-Chassis Communication Protocol for L2VPN PE Redundancy
     (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Alia Atlas
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items
     
   o draft-fairhurst-ipdvb-ule-iana-06  - IETF stream
     IANA Guidance for Managing the ULE Next-Header Registry (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Yes

2.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

2.3 Status Changes
2.3.1 New Items

   NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
3.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-15  - IETF stream
     Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management (Informational)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04  - IETF stream
     Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
     (Informational)
     Token: Spencer Dawkins
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-08  - IETF stream
     Mobile Multicast Sender Support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6)
     Domains (Experimental)
     Token: Brian Haberman
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location-09  - IETF stream
     Trustworthy Location (Informational)
     Token: Alissa Cooper
     IANA Review: Version Changed - Review Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

3.1.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14  - IETF stream
     An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
     Tools (Informational)
     Note: Scott Bradner (sob@harvard.edu) is the Document Shepherd.
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-abfab-arch-12  - IETF stream
     Application Bridging for Federated Access Beyond Web (ABFAB)
     Architecture (Informational)
     Token: Stephen Farrell
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09  - IETF stream
     Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LAN
     link (Informational)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-eman-framework-16  - IETF stream
     Energy Management Framework (Informational)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: No

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
3.2.1 New Items
     
   o draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-04  - IETF stream
     A Session Identifier for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
     (Informational)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: No

3.2.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-10  - IETF stream
     Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX (Informational)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

3.3 Status Changes
3.3.1 New Items

   NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents
3.4.1 New Items

   o conflict-review-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-01
     IETF conflict review for
     draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching
       draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-12
       Pre-standard Linear Protection Switching in MPLS-TP (ISE:
     Informational)
     Token: Adrian Farrel

   o conflict-review-melnikov-authentication-results-smime-00
     IETF conflict review for draft-melnikov-authentication-results-smime
       draft-melnikov-authentication-results-smime-08
       Authentication-Results Registration for S/MIME signature
     verification (ISE: Informational)
     Token: Barry Leiba

3.4.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.4.3 For Action

   o conflict-review-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-profile-00
     IETF conflict review for
     draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-profile
       draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-profile-03
       Connectivity Provisioning Profile (CPP) (ISE: Informational)
     Token: Jari Arkko

   o conflict-review-avula-shwmp-00
     IETF conflict review for draft-avula-shwmp
       draft-avula-shwmp-01
       Secure Hybrid Wireless Mesh Protocol (SHWMP) (ISE: Experimental)
     Token: Jari Arkko

   o conflict-review-dunbar-armd-arp-nd-scaling-practices-00
     IETF conflict review for draft-dunbar-armd-arp-nd-scaling-practices
       draft-dunbar-armd-arp-nd-scaling-practices-07
       Practices for scaling ARP and ND for large data centers (ISE:
     Informational)
     Token: Jari Arkko

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

   o DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports (dart)

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

   NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

   NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

   NONE




From nobody Sun Mar 23 15:06:35 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2511A6F7E for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1snuOivl0yD for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775E01A0A0C for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2NM6UTi005569 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:06:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2NM6Cwp016498 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:06:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s2NM6Ckl010086 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140323220612.GA10084@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/DZnTqnkebhypb84lg_cmRaGgfLQ
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 22:06:33 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-10        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-10        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active	


From nobody Sun Mar 30 14:06:37 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C511A08D8 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oGFPu1X8R9u9 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A11A08D7 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2UL6U5E002099 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:06:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2UL6CkB013787 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:06:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s2UL6CR9020889 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:06:12 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140330210612.GA20887@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/_z_M0AoD2vTY55g2YYKMfWPBh1A
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 21:06:35 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-11        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-03                    Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05                   Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed>	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-02                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-05                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-16                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-12                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-02                    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-02In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-11        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-02Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-01    Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-09     In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active