
From nobody Fri Jul  4 05:36:08 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812D41B288E; Fri,  4 Jul 2014 05:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 596yh6AWSk0y; Fri,  4 Jul 2014 05:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7201A0344; Fri,  4 Jul 2014 05:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4591; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404477340; x=1405686940; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y1ti2ymA6V5L6W/knO5olUE5oZ+H0tiVQXkJqrdKnAs=; b=Mf9BHN1V3rhR4paAPT8zm61ZIKmXgKNuhn4q5E1Ptb2snhTZ6CA2cg0x 4QPmFWUvKYJp1bgiHSkRNk2LE+Fdq/QipU12fDmIBduRHO1ERIOxeglxT njOJebW+s/XdCNzfWh2vkXLiQJjWHssvA4rmb9C92lhvK5wpZ0D6nedK5 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqMEAE+ftlOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABRCYNgg0nDOgGBI3WEAwEBAQQjFUANBB0IAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBNw4GAQwGAgEBiD6vFZsmEwSBLIpRgj0NDVWCd4FMAQSWXQWEFIcPhDeIRoNFO4EzJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,601,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="103808836"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2014 12:35:37 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s64CZbbY021679; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:35:37 GMT
Message-ID: <53B69F99.7040005@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:35:37 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "aaa-doctors@ietf.org" <aaa-doctors@ietf.org>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>, IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>
References: <20140703233531.27827.1171.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140703233531.27827.1171.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140703233531.27827.1171.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Atmvao3k4RAq7h7spmPu2p3jw4A
Subject: [pm-dir] PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for the July 10, 2014 Teleconference
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:35:42 -0000

Dear all,

Please find below the agenda of the July 10th IESG telechat.
Please send your questions, comments and concerns before July 9th COB.

Thanks and Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------

INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the 2014-07-10 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 2014-07-03 16:34:54 PDT
Up-to-date web version of this agenda can be found at:
https:///iesg/agenda/


2. Protocol Actions
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10  - IETF stream
     Peer-to-Peer Streaming Peer Protocol (PPSPP) (Proposed Standard)
     Note: Rachel Huang <Rachel@huawei.com> is the document shepherd.
     Token: Martin Stiemerling
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-straw-sip-traceroute-02  - IETF stream
     A Media-based Traceroute Function for the Session Initiation
     Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes
     Last call expires: 2014-07-04

   o draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-21  - IETF stream
     A Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal Mechanism for Media
     Controlled by Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Alissa Cooper
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Yes

   o draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-10  - IETF stream
     Power and Energy Monitoring MIB (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-15  - IETF stream
     Energy Object Context MIB (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-12  - IETF stream
     Definition of Managed Objects for Battery Monitoring (Proposed
     Standard)
     Token: Joel Jaeggli
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-sidr-cps-04  - IETF stream
     Template for a Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for the
     Resource PKI (RPKI) (Best Current Practice)
     Token: Alia Atlas
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07  - IETF stream
     An XMPP Sub-protocol for WebSocket (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown
     Last call expires: 2014-07-04

2.1.2 Returning Items
     
   o draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14  - IETF stream
     Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) (Proposed Standard)
     Token: Ted Lemon
     IANA Review: IANA - Not OK
     Consensus: Yes

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items

   NONE

2.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

2.3 Status Changes
2.3.1 New Items

   NONE

2.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
3.1.1 New Items
     
   o draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06  - IETF stream
     Textual Representation of IPFIX Abstract Data Types (Informational)
     Token: Benoit Claise
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-pce-questions-06  - IETF stream
     Unanswered Questions in the Path Computation Element Architecture
     (Informational)
     Token: Alia Atlas
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs-11  - IETF stream
     Security Requirements for BGP Path Validation (Informational)
     Token: Alia Atlas
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown

   o draft-ietf-stir-threats-03  - IETF stream
     Secure Telephone Identity Threat Model (Informational)
     Token: Richard Barnes
     IANA Review: IANA OK - No Actions Needed
     Consensus: Unknown
     Last call expires: 2014-07-04

3.1.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
3.2.1 New Items

   NONE

3.2.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.3 Status Changes
3.3.1 New Items

   NONE

3.3.2 Returning Items

   NONE

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission Stream Documents
3.4.1 New Items

   NONE

3.4.2 Returning Items

   NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review

   o Timezone Data Distribution Service (tzdist)

4.1.2 Proposed for Approval

   NONE

4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review

   NONE

4.2.2 Proposed for Approval

   NONE



From nobody Sun Jul  6 13:06:24 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086841A0A9A for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 13:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7TLAIiHTGnhN for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 13:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE3E1A0A95 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun,  6 Jul 2014 13:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s66K6FwL017186 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 05:06:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (sweet-brew-1.cisco.com [144.254.10.202]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s66K5uwd005722 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 22:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-1.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id s66K5t8R014187 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 22:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 22:05:55 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140706200555.GA14177@sweet-brew-1.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Xs3RapzcJ2nyfThEYvlkrPgcFHQ
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:06:22 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-05Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-10                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-11                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-04                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-07                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-08                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-05Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
-draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
-draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
+draft-ietf-alto-deployments-10                    Active	
+draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-11                 Active	
+draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-00                Active	
-draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
+draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-08                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::AD Followup>	
-draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
-draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
+draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-10                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>	
-draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
+draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	


From nobody Sun Jul 20 13:07:32 2014
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3046B1B2A6D for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnSC7mei_XRN for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5331B2A67 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 13:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6KK7K3j011481 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:07:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-1-old.cisco.com (sweet-brew-1-old.cisco.com [144.254.10.202]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6KK715p012104 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:07:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-1-old.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) id s6KK717j013033 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:07:00 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140720200700.GA13022@sweet-brew-1-old.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/G7x1H8RDQrgCFVmkgvNP11qmRkQ
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 20:07:30 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that are WG items and that reference YANG and/or NETCONF (any RFCs), as a normative or informative reference.
Drafts from the NETMOD and NETCONF working group are not included.

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-17                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
   
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-6lo-lowpan-mib-01                      Active	
draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-interface-00               Active	
draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-17                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

