From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon Feb 05 07:05:21 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HE2ax-00055X-Ep; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:05:15 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HE2aw-00051k-4i for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:05:14 -0500 Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([63.240.77.83]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HE2au-00087m-Oa for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:05:14 -0500 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2007020512051101300s7hr1e>; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:05:11 +0000 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l15C06oI012191 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 04:00:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l15C019I012190 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 04:00:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 04:00:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200702051200.l15C019I012190@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: e5bfa71b340354e384155def5e70b13b Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-02-08 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-02-08). Updated 2:2:26 EDT, February 5, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date A Policy Control Mechanism is IS-IS Using RTG Administrative Tags (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 9 draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Bill Fenner Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional RTG Router Capabilities (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 9 draft-ietf-ospf-cap-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: The PROTO shepherd is Rohit Dube Token: Bill Fenner RTG IS-IS Extensions for Advertising Router Information (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 9 draft-ietf-isis-caps-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Bill Fenner RTG Autonomous System Confederations for BGP (Draft Standard) - 4 of 9 draft-ietf-idr-rfc3065bis-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Bill Fenner Generic Aggregate Resource ReSerVation TSV Protocol (RSVP) Reservations (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 9 draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-ipsec-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Shepherd is James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) Token: Magnus Westerlund INT Fail Over extensions for L2TP "failover" (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 9 draft-ietf-l2tpext-failover-11.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Final version is draft-ietf-l2tpext-failover-12.txt, which contains small edits and was submitted on 1/ 30/07 Token: Mark Townsley Deployment Considerations for APP lemonade-compliant Mobile Email (BCP) - 7 of 9 draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie INT Secure Connectivity and Mobility using Mobile IPv4 and MOBIKE (BCP) - 8 of 9 draft-ietf-mip4-mobike-connectivity-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd is Token: Jari Arkko INT Mobile IPv4 Message String Extension (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 9 draft-ietf-mip4-message-string-ext-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd is Token: Jari Arkko 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) (Draft Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Brian Haberman is the Document shepherd NOTE: Tentatively put on the agenda. Still need to check if everything was actually revised correctly Token: Jari Arkko RTG Protocol Independent Multicast MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-pim-mib-v2-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Re-issued Last Call for downref to PIM-DM. Revised Last Call expires Feb 8. Token: Bill Fenner 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date Using HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384, and SEC HMAC-SHA-512 With IPsec (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-kelly-ipsec-ciph-sha2-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date APP Overview and Framework for Internationalized Email (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-eai-framework-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: The Document Shepherd is Harald Alvestrand. A version removing editorial artifacts and dealing with gen-art nits will be posted as -05, but review of -04 should be fine. Token: Ted Hardie 3.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT IP Address Location Privacy and Mobile IPv6: Problem Statement (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO Shepherd is Gopal Dommety . NOTE: Expecting a revised ID -05 before the telechat! NOTE: There are RFC Editor notes! Token: Jari Arkko 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date GEN Common Local Transmit and Receive Ports (Symmetric RTP) (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-wing-behave-symmetric-rtprtcp-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Note this is an RFC 3932 review Token: Magnus Westerlund 3.3.2 Returning Item Area Date RAI SIP Interface to VoiceXML Media Services (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-burke-vxml-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: This is an individual submission to the RFC Editor being shepherded through the IESG review process by Cullen Jennings. Token: Cullen Jennings 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RAI Jan 4 Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol (p2psip) - 1 of 1 Token: Cullen 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date RAI Jan 24 SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (simple) - 1 of 1 Token: Jon 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Removing unnecessary access control (Brian Carpenter) 6.2 Expert for approved document: draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14.txt [IANA #60294] (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon Feb 19 07:05:16 2007 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJ7Ga-0003jK-5D; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:05:12 -0500 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJ7GY-0003gs-IH for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:05:10 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([216.148.227.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJ7GX-0005fW-33 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:05:10 -0500 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070219120508m11008c098e>; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:05:08 +0000 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1JC017D042698 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:00:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1JC01Ac042697 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:00:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:00:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200702191200.l1JC01Ac042697@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 223e3c753032a50d5dc4443c921c3fcd Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-02-22 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-02-22). Updated 2:2:25 EDT, February 19, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date RAI A Telephony Gateway REgistration Protocol (TGREP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 8 draft-ietf-iptel-tgrep-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Proto shepherd in Jonathan Rosenberg Token: Cullen Jennings RTG Bi-directional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-PIM) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8 draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Bill Fenner Authenticated Chunks for Stream Control TSV Transmission Protocol (SCTP) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 8 draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund INT Fail Over extensions for L2TP "failover" (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 8 draft-ietf-l2tpext-failover-11.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley INT Enhanced Route Optimization for Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 8 draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley INT Wildcard Pseudowire Type (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 8 draft-ietf-pwe3-wildcard-pw-type-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley Deployment Considerations for APP lemonade-compliant Mobile Email (BCP) - 7 of 8 draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Multiple SEC Signer Clarification (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 8 draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN Five-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 2 Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-legg-xed-asd-07.txt Robust XML Encoding Rules (RXER) for Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) (Proposed Standard) draft-legg-xed-rxer-07.txt Encoding Instructions for the Robust XML Encoding Rules (RXER) (Proposed Standard) draft-legg-xed-rxer-ei-04.txt Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) Representation of Encoding Instructions for the Generic String Encoding Rules (GSER) (Proposed Standard) draft-legg-xed-asd-gserei-03.txt Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X) Representation of Encoding Instructions for the XML Encoding Rules (XER) (Proposed Standard) draft-legg-xed-asd-xerei-03.txt Token: Ted Hardie GEN RFC 4181 Update to Recognize the IETF Trust (BCP) - 2 of 2 draft-heard-rfc4181-update-00.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date Codepoint Registry for The Flags Field in the RTG Resource Reservation Protocol Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Session Attribute Object (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-mpls-iana-rsvp-session-flags-00.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Bill Fenner INT Problem Statement: Dual Stack Mobility (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-mip6-dsmip-problem-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO shepherd is Basavaraj Patil NOTE: There are significant RFC Editor notes! Token: Jari Arkko 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date APP A URN Namespace for GEANT (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-kalin-geant-urn-namespace-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Sent to URN-NID list for review in November of 2006 Token: Ted Hardie A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for APP Extensions to the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Sent to URN-NID list in November of 2006 Token: Ted Hardie 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date GEN Multi-homing for small scale fixed network Using Mobile IP and NEMO (Experimental) - 1 of 1 draft-nagami-mip6-nemo-multihome-fixed-network-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date GEN A Configuration Profile Schema for LDAP-based agents (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-joslin-config-schema-17.txt Note: Proposed for response 2, note 2 of RFC 3932 Token: Ted Hardie 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RAI Jan 4 Media Server Control (mediactrl) - 1 of 2 Token: Cullen TSV Feb 2 Pre-Congestion Notification (pcn) - 2 of 2 Token: Lars 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RAI Jan 24 SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (simple) - 1 of 1 Token: Jon 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Expert for RFC4236 [IANA #62135] (Michelle Cotton) 6.2 Approve ion-procdocs (Brian Carpenter) 7. Working Group News