From olau@iola.dk Tue Dec 4 04:27:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9CB21F8941 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:27:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.118 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZzLTgyFt0ahE for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6978721F8932 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:27:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so1718416wey.31 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:27:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=wSzNYojmImuLHlCibIq/Za9MLWSQp6qVXuT7ctorIhQ=; b=iVDZGwds5+US8FG6hFSN1bVHY7WM/ZQJpFf1O1UC3tILaIlPZegdnjp0jVDpX9D/D0 I/UYHTNxJU30msq3Hc2aq71VldYe0keuvt582Az5Js/PEepoLJbTyO2O8cJJlYt0ccdB MiqN5R7SHhJ12hs5qg43gcyMXQj+Iq+4o22Z2JxGQALJjFshnf0b8jCFIDo/Vi3UB1Ap LsxpCvS6tTn6pOzKuajBG5PLTtFo8Fo8p4Up6D7wtEErcIT3MTz6GfvgdzXPeITIZBK/ 814LbWd52N+k4t9iW7syAVlshivOH0Og54/NjnZqthCTRC6kjc2EJBWVRifTrZ1gcZRY 5YOw== Received: by 10.216.144.76 with SMTP id m54mr4686787wej.22.1354624077193; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:27:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.41.169 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:27:36 -0800 (PST) From: Ole Laursen Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:27:36 +0100 Message-ID: To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlc6qjRPY9m1Xk+k1rrkmy3Mj+eazKjVGGIw+D334wMkuwfsA+deL9YV8M7l/HBW9Sk4X2r Subject: [Tools-discuss] Milestone functionality ready X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:27:59 -0000 Hi! The milestone functionality for WG chairs and ADs is ready. Changes: - can add, edit and delete milestones - additions require approval from an AD (ADs are emailed and there's a page listing unreviewed milestones) - can associate drafts with a milestone - milestones appear on associated drafts - can mark a milestone as done - automatic reminders for due and overdue milestones - can add milestones to new charters/recharterings If you are interested, it would be really helpful if you would give this test server http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/ a spin - just try walking through what you'd normally do. TEST NOTES The test server is running on a local database dump from last Friday, so you can change things as you like. Login with your usual account and blank password. Emails are suppressed, unless you go to http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/accounts/testemail/ and fill in your information - then you'll get email you produce forwarded. Also note that some information outside the database dump may be missing from the test server so some links may be dead. In particular, the server is probably missing some of the charter texts. Ole From olau@iola.dk Tue Dec 4 05:50:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866AB21F8941 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:50:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZfatLwuBTPz for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:50:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C3221F88F9 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so583917wib.13 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:50:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=WGWZaL0y4eO85jnx/HGmiNs18yd7H6DpUpQH7YnAGNo=; b=AHvwivEgK0pnKhkJjuJAShhOyhv/NwGXcSrsSQs5U//Fr7yHscfrhUpPDZXYSxSJG7 UEKhZ7L/rMCiEAGmUGG4pYhrYPBpDJtVWd4Y/I1lDxuvHAAe9+QKImI0wmKwYOhfGaBu EufhE94KNb2W8gPUYDWkawMQo2nIWRis350fzITfHxfiXmelDI3twJV4iZEdF/T6FzKp UqR0CvPvBWSBqIERyvnkpd17uEwbxsAocKXkiTaxcnbilCivFug39sXYxZa0LPw/nijB PMSEp0C7/6D5Tmz5agNXCGph/eNhSNQ6Y1P01KPDEY6m/23M3uWG2/a4vh0nnNuSDdDL 5amg== Received: by 10.216.144.76 with SMTP id m54mr4799920wej.22.1354629014645; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:50:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.41.169 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ole Laursen Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:49:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk23EoJvfbTtExO+OKI5+FIYVoLHELAceiCjj74vELYGaL8ufuOf8QRGhYYLUhvXBJ/BiM/ Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Milestone functionality ready X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:50:16 -0000 2012/12/4 Ole Laursen : > If you are interested, it would be really helpful if you would give > this test server > > http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/ > > a spin - just try walking through what you'd normally do. I.e., go to a WG page (like http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/wg/geopriv/), click the charter tab, login with the link in the top right (usual username, blank password), and there should be an add/edit link next to the Milestones headline. Ole From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Tue Dec 4 08:21:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE5421F8AC6 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rguRSC0tX7qG for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118BF21F893D for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:21:26 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f926d00000661f-f0-50be2305523b Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F4.86.26143.5032EB05; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:21:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:21:25 +0100 Message-ID: <50BE2304.8060407@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:21:24 +0100 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ole Laursen References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjS6b8r4Ag3M3uCzaDq1mt9h+ZC6j A5PHkiU/mTwW9K9hCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MrYMGMVa8FPiYr3vw+zNTB+E+5i5OSQEDCR 2DBvGSuELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgZOMEtv/7WKBcJYxSmw5+ZgNpIpXQFvi/98mdhCbRUBF4u/W u0wgNpuAhcTNH41gNaICvhKz9vxigqgXlDg58wkLiC0iICexdtJPoG0cHMwCUhJ3D9SAhIUF rCTOnu5mhtg1lVFizak/YPWcAoESt863MkFcJymxaFonWJxZQE9iytUWRghbXqJ562xmEFsI 6LaGpg7WCYxCs5CsnoWkZRaSlgWMzKsY2XMTM3PSy402MQKD9eCW36o7GO+cEznEKM3BoiTO a711j7+QQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRp34vJcPYn+cS/+u7nZ644t1DpNrIvuO CDPsi1i503hqGZN/SMHBuYYFLhMvdJ/nZJxqOM37clfeLyEb710uEQ/YleudBPoXn7Vc0/fR Qo/PPbp7cmrHmQ0h17OSf/yT+KPtyK+5sCn66Ld0PtM8Jm9rG0MupcMiwptri06dWOp7e9b/ tkQZJZbijERDLeai4kQAvG+l7yQCAAA= Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Milestone functionality ready X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:21:28 -0000 On 2012-12-04 14:49, Ole Laursen wrote: > 2012/12/4 Ole Laursen : >> If you are interested, it would be really helpful if you would give >> this test server >> >> http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/ >> >> a spin - just try walking through what you'd normally do. > > I.e., go to a WG page (like > http://milestones.ietf.beta.iola.dk/wg/geopriv/), click the charter > tab, login with the link in the top right (usual username, blank > password), and there should be an add/edit link next to the Milestones > headline. > Hi, I have reviewed this and have some comments. First on the charter page, can you please make the "add/edit Milestone" link a button or at least some clearer indication that this is "do something" link rather than an information link. On the edit page I have these comments: 1. When clicking to edit an milestone, could we get a color box around the item opened for editing so that one clearer see the boundaries of the item one is actually editing. 2. Clicking on an item opens it up. But as long as staying on the edit page with the "Review Changes" button they stay open, even if nothing is changed. This makes it a bit unclear what one has actually edited. And if one has many milestones, like some of my WGs it gets a bit crowded. I would prefer if none edited ones are collapsed when selecting another milestone. 3. I would like to get clear indication of which items are actually edited. I think a "pink" or second color box around the items that has been edited would be nice. Thus one can more easily determine if one has fucked up and need to cancel rather than press review changes. 4. As a WG chair the "delete" checkbox appears to not be possible to use? If it intended to work as a chair but requires approval, then I think it should say so. If it is not intended to work, why does I as WG chair see it? 5. When reviewing my changes. It would be good if the milestone having been changed actually was marked in some way. 6. Why does the edit/page have a save button prior to applying any changes. This will either result in extra work and likely cases when one forget to press save because it is always there, not only when there is a reason to press it. 7. Why is the "back" a link and the "Save" / "Review changes" a button. looks a bit strange next to each other. 8. Possibly "back" should change to "Cancel", if that is what happens if I have none-saved changes. But in general the functionality appears to have some utility and I understand that there will be services coupled to these state in the future that will be useful. The auto-suggest for draft names is very nice feature. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From olau@iola.dk Wed Dec 5 13:31:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1390E21F871A for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:31:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.048 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4mCDuCYI1E8 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EBC21F8717 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id dr13so2443683wgb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:31:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=8Y3wJwd8rZVj+gbzGfkFSradLLzNyUaqhAWIzvRSOi0=; b=c6+b8U0Fa2F2u9DYJhoYUs59XznKHHgcvO4D8UucvzR7CFcW+DkpKno+XgoATpqOpB zWc9+M8RXDIi//WBRYdNiO/++WYpwphSqyfVcWzuTqSXvHEqRExdVujFZDvG5F2iYDi+ bNGeBJedKE9bv1VyOEA0vHogvE9T3nF3+m6tO/cGrRt5Oc3UvbqJuRP25c4G8bovLAVN xSR+pY358bOZ51oIT/CdTdEptTVR8c6guA3ZFjUhEtfAK7cfoYvAUz5NiJFX8i2/G7j8 olFQBJVYV52QrYnbhqg/svjkjVUdv1KYsUI93RGwerX6av4Ir29ED/iFe2R4bQpD88p6 6HmA== Received: by 10.180.93.69 with SMTP id cs5mr5577183wib.3.1354743091202; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:31:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.41.169 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 13:31:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50BE2304.8060407@ericsson.com> References: <50BE2304.8060407@ericsson.com> From: Ole Laursen Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:31:11 +0100 Message-ID: To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmjF6/oVQ6p3C/dtFeI/3yvUf3b9uwpqLF8Q+Q7O5B9WoYY6CCE6gX91BZmzqDsXrWJOyqJ Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Milestone functionality ready X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:31:33 -0000 Hi! Thanks for the review! I think I fixed all your comments. 2012/12/4 Magnus Westerlund : > First on the charter page, can you please make the "add/edit Milestone" > link a button or at least some clearer indication that this is "do > something" link rather than an information link. I've styled it like a button now. > 1. When clicking to edit an milestone, could we get a color box around > the item opened for editing so that one clearer see the boundaries of > the item one is actually editing. I've increased the spacing - it's not entirely easy to define what's currently being edited. > 2. Clicking on an item opens it up. But as long as staying on the edit > page with the "Review Changes" button they stay open, even if nothing is > changed. This makes it a bit unclear what one has actually edited. And > if one has many milestones, like some of my WGs it gets a bit crowded. I > would prefer if none edited ones are collapsed when selecting another > milestone. True. I've fixed this. It's not 100% perfect in that you can change something and change it back. To make it perfect, I would need to export the full state to Javascript, but that's a bigger change. > 3. I would like to get clear indication of which items are actually > edited. I think a "pink" or second color box around the items that has > been edited would be nice. Thus one can more easily determine if one has > fucked up and need to cancel rather than press review changes. Now that they collapse, I think this is much more clear. > 4. As a WG chair the "delete" checkbox appears to not be possible to > use? This turned out to be a bug in the review page that it didn't show you that the milestone was being deleted. Fixed. > 5. When reviewing my changes. It would be good if the milestone having > been changed actually was marked in some way. Right, fixed. > 6. Why does the edit/page have a save button prior to applying any > changes. Right, fixed. > 7. Why is the "back" a link and the "Save" / "Review changes" a button. > looks a bit strange next to each other. I've reused the button design for both now. > 8. Possibly "back" should change to "Cancel", if that is what happens if > I have none-saved changes. Good point. It's now cancel. Ole From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Thu Dec 6 02:35:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F318221F86AE for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:35:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMe+StcJzBem for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:35:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE5E21F86AD for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:35:15 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f936d0000018b3-68-50c074e2ae97 Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 24.94.06323.2E470C05; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:35:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:35:14 +0100 Message-ID: <50C074DE.8070304@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:35:10 +0100 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ole Laursen References: <50BE2304.8060407@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6jkgMBBteuali0HVrNbrH9yFxG ByaPJUt+Mnks6F/DFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXRd6iFpWCdZMWJu49YGxj/CXcxcnJICJhI TNreyQZhi0lcuLceyObiEBI4ySixrnEDK4SzjFFix5b/jCBVvALaEldWdLKD2CwCKhI3X8wD 62YTsJC4+aMRzBYV8JWYtecXE0S9oMTJmU9YQGwRATmJtZN+Ag3l4GAWkJK4e6AGJCwsYCVx 9nQ3M4gtJPCLUeLTdRUQm1MgUOL2sw6o4yQlFk3rBBvDLKAnMeVqCyOELS/RvHU2VK+2RENT B+sERqFZSDbPQtIyC0nLAkbmVYzsuYmZOenl5psYgaF6cMtvgx2Mm+6LHWKU5mBREufVU93v LySQnliSmp2aWpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoGxxW2ZWaAEb/rP/saoU3q1U/t1fvPMn/B+5dRz f2ZWXJ+0rbKzbIGegaRsile5SvqDKesOnZzaKiZQzbg/nLvNY/Fatyn71t/MkL3d5TDPuSV3 2vE3y06yT2FfU5UatPeZgX3j5FSbwwlFQquu/t1RIuG5WMDYQXHNrbp5N7g/MM0s+RN0bNs2 JZbijERDLeai4kQA6mPDPCMCAAA= Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Milestone functionality ready X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0000 Hi, Many thanks for the quick updates. I think this resolves my issue satisfactory. Cheers Magnus On 2012-12-05 22:31, Ole Laursen wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the review! I think I fixed all your comments. > > 2012/12/4 Magnus Westerlund : >> First on the charter page, can you please make the "add/edit Milestone" >> link a button or at least some clearer indication that this is "do >> something" link rather than an information link. > > I've styled it like a button now. > >> 1. When clicking to edit an milestone, could we get a color box around >> the item opened for editing so that one clearer see the boundaries of >> the item one is actually editing. > > I've increased the spacing - it's not entirely easy to define what's > currently being edited. > >> 2. Clicking on an item opens it up. But as long as staying on the edit >> page with the "Review Changes" button they stay open, even if nothing is >> changed. This makes it a bit unclear what one has actually edited. And >> if one has many milestones, like some of my WGs it gets a bit crowded. I >> would prefer if none edited ones are collapsed when selecting another >> milestone. > > True. I've fixed this. It's not 100% perfect in that you can change > something and change it back. To make it perfect, I would need to > export the full state to Javascript, but that's a bigger change. > >> 3. I would like to get clear indication of which items are actually >> edited. I think a "pink" or second color box around the items that has >> been edited would be nice. Thus one can more easily determine if one has >> fucked up and need to cancel rather than press review changes. > > Now that they collapse, I think this is much more clear. > >> 4. As a WG chair the "delete" checkbox appears to not be possible to >> use? > > This turned out to be a bug in the review page that it didn't show you > that the milestone was being deleted. Fixed. > >> 5. When reviewing my changes. It would be good if the milestone having >> been changed actually was marked in some way. > > Right, fixed. > >> 6. Why does the edit/page have a save button prior to applying any >> changes. > Right, fixed. > >> 7. Why is the "back" a link and the "Save" / "Review changes" a button. >> looks a bit strange next to each other. > > I've reused the button design for both now. > >> 8. Possibly "back" should change to "Cancel", if that is what happens if >> I have none-saved changes. > > Good point. It's now cancel. > > > Ole > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From martin.thomson@gmail.com Fri Dec 14 17:36:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D921721F8B35 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.984 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqIB4muXdY6K for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1457321F8AE2 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so3278043lah.31 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z+mC9O4/qMWIfYX7a7QtI7faJcNUMsQ3cg36nEggeyY=; b=Pe0VnaNHLQg8tdPJC+ttGgUTEhDR9K7r7YTgEY5eCJCLk/427VB/nYRFneCY3WjnP0 B8rHeAnb9ZZfWkIuLEy+WAW/6oDn6R99CBr4hoA1Q/XVqJh7Xz+5hhRjhL9OBvwrbX42 wyFR+Olg/ms9W8xj6P9yZOoL3j66dtAmFztjLC/hJ9V9I4Q+3U8Gn4ATLPCSPnstQTRt cYCGf+KbIIwNAYIV2FtRHAsRYAsPh+2K4JSVzniVjgMgXzcytO1y3GhopZzzLCxM17Ul IdeUuRBvSFxBcyjlQhDBYq0j28RLwFDtLoOb0WV3AB2SyPx0PjJVBINBkxLu/y+t8lru paSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.23.136 with SMTP id m8mr3066074lbf.16.1355535371719; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.98.200 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:36:11 -0800 Message-ID: From: Martin Thomson To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Tools-discuss] SVN down? X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:36:14 -0000 I've tried several times to update from http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2 and all I get is a timeout. Or is this something at my end? From fred@cisco.com Sat Dec 15 14:56:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8459A21F853C; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:56:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id przSxmITWCey; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BB821F8538; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:56:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1408; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1355612185; x=1356821785; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=mhoOoqAKhm/TeXvf4l9GU0WXP4zU1BsMhqIWpWwg2bg=; b=kA6g2p7CV2gGyrgq/bvrOW8rpEdAoCBOovMrP7wPTIr2T+EkFHzHGoxk mh13hzZCf0XAB9UH8ssUXmYwK3DJPwZzMO1yD5rgm2y6Lslt3LTQXWHom dKLeFakaZz0Zw/u2//SEGuJfOS//pRB6VuDeIEBdzuRBFfvCz6HD+8icf M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAJv/zFCtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABFvlMWc4IeAQEBAwE6PxACAQgiDAEHEDIlAgQOBQiIBQYMuwUEjF2BFgGCS2EDplKCc4FmBxce X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,291,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="150373695" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2012 22:56:25 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBFMuOne014250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:56:25 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.13]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:56:24 -0600 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: IETF I-D Submission Tool Thread-Topic: New draft waiting for approval: draft-ietf-v6ops-64share Thread-Index: AQHN2oKnHWycd4was0ib/5DOwRBR3Jga3l6A Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:56:23 +0000 Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7144FC@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> References: <20121215051132.31325.66395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20121215051132.31325.66395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.119] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: joel jaeggli , "draft-byrne-v6ops-64share@tools.ietf.org" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] New draft waiting for approval: draft-ietf-v6ops-64share X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:56:26 -0000 Please post this. As usual, the page you're directing me to only allows me = to cancel it, not approve its posting. On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:11 AM, IETF I-D Submission Tool wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > WG chair approval is needed for posting of draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-00. >=20 > To approve the draft, go to this URL (note: you need to login to be able = to approve): > https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/46995/639e79ce4b1efdc00f08031= 98b3b34df/ >=20 > File name : draft-ietf-v6ops-64share > Version : 00 > Submission date : 2012-12-14 > WG : v6ops >=20 > Title : Sharing /64 3GPP Mobile Interface Subnet to a LAN > Document date : 2012-12-14 > Pages : 6 > File size : 10.6 KB >=20 > Submitter : Cameron Byrne >=20 > Abstract : This document describes a known and implemented met= hod of sharing a > /64 IPv6 prefix from a User Equipment 3GPP radio interface to a > tethered LAN. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Authors: > Cameron Byrne > Dan Drown >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > The IETF Secretariat > through the draft submission service ---------------------------------------------------- The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially.=20 - Marshall McLuhan From richard.barnes@gmail.com Fri Dec 21 08:43:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0CB21F87FB for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaQY-ywNNQCY for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com (mail-pb0-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D9A21F87C6 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id wy7so2838457pbc.33 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=V8WdgfqbmClfTzh5huCG+WSP2ytfA9xkflnXacwYq6w=; b=omsbnLNNXW6rFLmchZl8J6SiIrS6DbnAFEziisDF46jVKvBwJGBv6hoh8UDILbRKsE IWNJcrr1LBu0Mdf3dtC1ZWp6mrFBH5gv1UvrMYrT7C97+sfmaFmPDyGHWU1AKGAV3gxm TL1NlxRuiFjt35hk4OqhdvxsA1BS8OouY6M70VoZgROy7aAaX746PZRjfUetion8Cy5+ Y8GurpK+/oFJyYnE+YQDDMjvb8Sy5MqZXdsslSuClrxFpWaUu8PgdXrAdWtxeAOnmZ2u MiIfX3X8IC73wylJ8qKio7C5Bc9bSyA1UIYdYI0vSkUiyCIDOpQo4wqJSOPYHTsOjRbf Rvgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.143.100 with SMTP id sd4mr33890379pbb.107.1356108209735; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.54.133 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:43:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:43:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: Richard Barnes To: Tools Team Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e3f341e49c604d15f8cd0 Subject: [Tools-discuss] Etherpad integration X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:43:30 -0000 --047d7b2e3f341e49c604d15f8cd0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, The IESG scribes have been using Etherpad for note taking on the last few telechats, with the scribes as primary authors and IESG members able to make corrections as we go along. (The old process was to email around minutes for comment.) However, to date, we've had to use external instances of ether pad (e.g., piratepad), instead of something running on the IETF servers. It would be really cool if we could have an actually in-house etherpad instance. And extra cool if we could auto-populate with the telechat agenda, and auto publish from the etherpad. I'm willing to do some work on creating these capabilities in the datatracker, but don't really know where to start. Does anyone have any references, say to how the etherpad stuff is done on the WG pages under tools.ietf.org? Anyone else interested in helping? Thanks, --Richard --047d7b2e3f341e49c604d15f8cd0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey all,

The IESG scribes h= ave been using Etherpad for note taking on the last few telechats, with the= scribes as primary authors and IESG members able to make corrections as we= go along. =A0(The old process was to email around minutes for comment.) = =A0However, to date, we've had to use external instances of ether pad (= e.g., piratepad), instead of something running on the IETF servers. =A0
It would be really cool if we could have an actually i= n-house etherpad instance. =A0And extra cool if we could auto-populate with= the telechat agenda, and auto publish from the etherpad. =A0I'm willin= g to do some work on creating these capabilities in the datatracker, but do= n't really know where to start. Does anyone have any references, say to= how the etherpad stuff is done on the WG pages under tools.ietf.org? =A0Anyone else interested in helping?

Thanks,
--Richard
--047d7b2e3f341e49c604d15f8cd0-- From rafiee@hpi.uni-potsdam.de Fri Dec 21 17:35:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D48921F8ABA for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:35:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.692 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.692 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.556, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5AulFCG7tvF5 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de (mail2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de [IPv6:2001:638:807:204::8d59:e17a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E764821F8A7E for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from owa2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de (owa2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.225.162]) by mail2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055C6D2C9D for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:35:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from 8MXMA1R.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([fe80::88e9:3d98:b35f:83bf]) by OWA2.hpi.uni-potsdam.de ([2002:8d59:e1a2::8d59:e1a2]) with mapi; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:35:30 +0100 From: "Rafiee, Hosnieh" To: "Tools-discuss@ietf.org" Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:35:28 +0100 Thread-Topic: new version of my RFC editor is available Thread-Index: Ac3f4olqscScl/RkQtK/mAgSPQJwyg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EA738325B0580041A50A364F5F76B68924EB86C7DB8MXMA1Rhpiuni_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Tools-discuss] new version of my RFC editor is available X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:35:36 -0000 --_000_EA738325B0580041A50A364F5F76B68924EB86C7DB8MXMA1Rhpiuni_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, New version of my editor is available online. Please let me know it if you = need more changes to support other needs. http://editor.rozanak.com Best Regards, Hosnieh --_000_EA738325B0580041A50A364F5F76B68924EB86C7DB8MXMA1Rhpiuni_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

New ver= sion of my editor is available online. Please let me know it if you need mo= re changes to support other needs.

http://editor.rozanak.com <= /p>

 

Best Rega= rds,

Hosnieh

= = --_000_EA738325B0580041A50A364F5F76B68924EB86C7DB8MXMA1Rhpiuni_--