From brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com Fri Feb 1 00:23:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F5C21F8698 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:23:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.19 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.501, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nu0If2dpv7aQ for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3255E21F8639 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ez12so285511wid.0 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:23:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Chgqzdr69uE7G6tHC7dAt+Hs66a678Su+LMmZHRdcc=; b=WhwAIC4iAxJWIUKcp16/QLwYkiK162e8ZYjfoxW1J09WvyaQcoTDWX3KA3sixRE6Dz iosmRI7yYiFZYYfGAwJFI/vByv4ACcxJBdy1gP2F9wU3dAKn41MnUfFCrgOoPcl6G1Fz 1f9IxBZNs6pALUIrHhfYq2/C+uXtsvubcMd4jSNo1B8sB7yJUzz7hs0cdLrPiK/XrulJ fGDWCryk272MMmrML/88fS6hyz28woCTOpDeNG9jxBdztPJMUAb8KiVTGLidyU8gBVLj RIbKGPGcrDyRx6ob06cReZ0fyEGz6gM5qjUgBNEwud+BVzNU+xHZ7pAGZEh8+T4mm+hb vmMw== X-Received: by 10.194.156.170 with SMTP id wf10mr1815178wjb.25.1359707003348; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-219-71.as13285.net. [2.102.219.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm1844258wic.2.2013.02.01.00.23.21 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:23:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510B7B87.1050605@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:23:35 +0000 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tools Team Discussion References: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Querying a failure mode in I-D submission X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:23:25 -0000 Just to complete the story: today the draft submission succeeded, so whatever state was blocking it yesterday has been deleted overnight. The existence of the bug is pretty much confirmed. Any ideas, or shall I just submit this as a ticket? Brian On 31/01/2013 12:47, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi, > > Is the following a possible bug in the I-D submission system? > > It's only speculation, but I think this has happened to me twice now. > > 1. I verify a new (non-WG, -00) draft via http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ > (with one warning, see below**). > > 2. Then I attempt to submit it via https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi > > The system comes back with "Your draft has NOT been verified to meet IDNITS requirements. (View IDNITS Results)" > and the nits results are completely blank (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/47888/#) > > Last time this happened I submitted a ticket without result, and when I > tried the submission again a day later, it worked fine. This time, I will > try again tomorrow... > > Is it possible that the manual idnits run is leaving behind some state that causes > the idnits run during the upload to fail? > > ** The warning that I get is: > > == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may > comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 > work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal > Provisions document at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine > if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. > > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > > From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Fri Feb 1 01:11:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF4221F8792 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 01:11:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.303 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.946, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnPxeYdcm3Os for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 01:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5752F21F86C1 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 01:11:56 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f0d6d000007e61-ed-510b86dbd45e Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B0.2A.32353.BD68B015; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:11:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:11:55 +0100 Message-ID: <510B86D9.9050208@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:11:53 +0100 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian E Carpenter References: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> <510B7B87.1050605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <510B7B87.1050605@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Vvd2G3egwZZmcYu2i/uYLLYfmcvo wOSxc9Zddo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGUsPh5Y8EqkYur0+8wNjHcEuhg5OSQETCQ2 PLnPBmGLSVy4tx7I5uIQEjjJKNH98xkTSEJIYBmjRPsfMRCbV0BbYtmkpywgNouAisSBNX3M IDabgIXEzR+NYINEBYIlNhxcxQRRLyhxcuYTsHoRAWOJxq7TrCA2s4CRxItFc8BqhAXcJD5M 3c0IsctZ4vaPB2AzOQU0Jc5tuATUywF0nLjEmjccEK16ElOutjBC2PISzVtnM0O0aks0NHWw TmAUmoVk8ywkLbOQtCxgZF7FyJ6bmJmTXm6+iREYpge3/DbYwbjpvtghRmkOFiVx3nDXCwFC AumJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5qcWHGJk4OKUaGBt7U7f/M3lZxsIhuyzdfTtHsi6v3jFbD7658b0b +BtaCi4IvmnUY97JzaM0dWb5vu2T33uas134/3hvpv/8hx8z513uvp/62vpyY7b9mXfpZaF6 TpEHnuQdC739Rt+eqVXt7NyWJMmMvPfubpOcozde0GVbGHo9+Zg9+9JVsvfT9txcfUP4gRJL cUaioRZzUXEiAKagjNwhAgAA Cc: Tools Team Discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Querying a failure mode in I-D submission X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:11:59 -0000 Hi Brian, I did submit a ticket yesterday on the failure of ID submission. Which they apparently have fixed. I did notice that there was a mismatch of ID-nits version where the submission process used 2.12.14 and tools site still uses 2.12.13. Cheers Magnus On 2013-02-01 09:23, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Just to complete the story: today the draft submission succeeded, > so whatever state was blocking it yesterday has been deleted overnight. > The existence of the bug is pretty much confirmed. > > Any ideas, or shall I just submit this as a ticket? > > Brian > > On 31/01/2013 12:47, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is the following a possible bug in the I-D submission system? >> >> It's only speculation, but I think this has happened to me twice now. >> >> 1. I verify a new (non-WG, -00) draft via http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ >> (with one warning, see below**). >> >> 2. Then I attempt to submit it via https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi >> >> The system comes back with "Your draft has NOT been verified to meet IDNITS requirements. (View IDNITS Results)" >> and the nits results are completely blank (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/47888/#) >> >> Last time this happened I submitted a ticket without result, and when I >> tried the submission again a day later, it worked fine. This time, I will >> try again tomorrow... >> >> Is it possible that the manual idnits run is leaving behind some state that causes >> the idnits run during the upload to fail? >> >> ** The warning that I get is: >> >> == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may >> comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 >> work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal >> Provisions document at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine >> if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. >> >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From sob@sobco.com Thu Jan 31 08:23:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CDB21F842A for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:23:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.495 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O8SJRwQ+RPEZ for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A96021F86B1 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47598C6BC4B for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:22:59 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mo4MHN12XOi2 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:22:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from vlan2hcp5.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.175]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA715C6BC3C for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:22:57 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Scott O Bradner In-Reply-To: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:22:51 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8AFCEDA2-59E1-4781-B259-0FBFC3F454D0@sobco.com> References: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> To: Tools discussion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:25:07 -0800 Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Querying a failure mode in I-D submission X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:23:09 -0000 I'm getting something like this as well but with a updated ID=20 it says that the ID has not been verified to pass ID Nits but when I = look at the ID Nits output I just see "idnits 2.12.14" Scott On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Brian E Carpenter = wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is the following a possible bug in the I-D submission system? >=20 > It's only speculation, but I think this has happened to me twice now. >=20 > 1. I verify a new (non-WG, -00) draft via = http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ > (with one warning, see below**). >=20 > 2. Then I attempt to submit it via = https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi >=20 > The system comes back with "Your draft has NOT been verified to meet = IDNITS requirements. (View IDNITS Results)" > and the nits results are completely blank = (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/47888/#) >=20 > Last time this happened I submitted a ticket without result, and when = I > tried the submission again a day later, it worked fine. This time, I = will > try again tomorrow... >=20 > Is it possible that the manual idnits run is leaving behind some state = that causes > the idnits run during the upload to fail? >=20 > ** The warning that I get is: >=20 > =3D=3D Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- = there may > comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for = pre-RFC5378 > work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the = Legal > Provisions document at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to = determine > if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. >=20 >=20 > Regards > Brian Carpenter >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com Mon Feb 4 05:20:04 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEF821F8488 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:20:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.835 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.856, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pcE8RfctfCeE for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:20:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997421F8472 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi18so1588523wib.9 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:20:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A0ECbN3BXiCXPCyYvPXq4QvhXPDBi2g2fyNQc4M2580=; b=zOBg4Jw41/rXsH2zTLGlbIN4soNYSWDH+DojX7/6tHeNrdLvADyBymOfvlUpUmC5DE 6vUVw45UHzuK5ZEVCOHMS6CgpOZiYshLuiS9BxjaWzpX6LeuXuIgq25NuUXv90Y+SqZK /VcAbqQnOnKO16zeHQeFaRFZiW4kkaXWnt/JrcNjIzbMiW7YQeT4LWEq8GO1j5IlHwC/ Dizume8eCAd4hkZcY/424BHJKvyTuZcDfH+JdjNUyjXAl3UPTPQlHn2RlMtk3Q18XhEO 40rNkC/W5ii47MldnSjwTu5KP6CW6L6VLNxdWOagONpp2BlvEkK+IUJ74y+dLXgr1WSS X7vw== X-Received: by 10.194.109.102 with SMTP id hr6mr5011944wjb.24.1359984001883; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-101-189-53.as13285.net. [2.101.189.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s8sm19917953wif.9.2013.02.04.05.20.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:20:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510FB581.3080600@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:20:01 +0000 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott O Bradner References: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> <8AFCEDA2-59E1-4781-B259-0FBFC3F454D0@sobco.com> In-Reply-To: <8AFCEDA2-59E1-4781-B259-0FBFC3F454D0@sobco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tools discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Querying a failure mode in I-D submission X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:20:04 -0000 On 31/01/2013 16:22, Scott O Bradner wrote: > I'm getting something like this as well but with a updated ID > > it says that the ID has not been verified to pass ID Nits but when I look > at the ID Nits output I just see "idnits 2.12.14" Yes, that's the symptom, so my speculation that it's related to a 00 version was false. Brian > > Scott > > On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is the following a possible bug in the I-D submission system? >> >> It's only speculation, but I think this has happened to me twice now. >> >> 1. I verify a new (non-WG, -00) draft via http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ >> (with one warning, see below**). >> >> 2. Then I attempt to submit it via https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi >> >> The system comes back with "Your draft has NOT been verified to meet IDNITS requirements. (View IDNITS Results)" >> and the nits results are completely blank (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/47888/#) >> >> Last time this happened I submitted a ticket without result, and when I >> tried the submission again a day later, it worked fine. This time, I will >> try again tomorrow... >> >> Is it possible that the manual idnits run is leaving behind some state that causes >> the idnits run during the upload to fail? >> >> ** The warning that I get is: >> >> == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may >> comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 >> work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal >> Provisions document at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine >> if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. >> >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > From henrik@levkowetz.com Mon Feb 4 08:25:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81DE21F889D for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:25:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CoNHO1FvhUYP for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:25:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5079821F88B1 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:157c:cd7b:4af4:9cff] (port=64451 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U2Oqy-0007OY-Cl; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: <510FE0E3.7010905@levkowetz.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:25:07 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott O Bradner References: <510A67CE.40606@gmail.com> <8AFCEDA2-59E1-4781-B259-0FBFC3F454D0@sobco.com> In-Reply-To: <8AFCEDA2-59E1-4781-B259-0FBFC3F454D0@sobco.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:157c:cd7b:4af4:9cff X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: sob@sobco.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: Tools discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Querying a failure mode in I-D submission X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:25:33 -0000 Hi, This phenomenon (bug, issue, annoying behaviour) started some time in December. Occasionally, the text returned to the submission tool after a call-out to idnits only contains the first few lines of text, which means that the submission tool can't find idnits' "No nits found" declaration. Once this starts occurring, it can be fixed by doing a reload or restart of Apache. Lacking a reload, it will occur much more often after the first occurrence. We haven't managed to figure out what triggers this, and once it occurs, the desire is to do a reload on Apache to get the service operating properly again, of course, so debugging is hard... My current thoughts are that Apache could be timing the shell process out too early in some load situations, and I'm looking at ways to verify and possibly mitigate this, but I have neither a definite idea of what the problem is, or a clear solution, at the moment. When this occurs, the secretariat now knows to do a reload on Apache, but this is not a solution, just a temporary workaround. Best regards, Henrik On 2013-01-31 17:22 Scott O Bradner said: > I'm getting something like this as well but with a updated ID > > it says that the ID has not been verified to pass ID Nits but when I look > at the ID Nits output I just see "idnits 2.12.14" > > Scott > > On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is the following a possible bug in the I-D submission system? >> >> It's only speculation, but I think this has happened to me twice now. >> >> 1. I verify a new (non-WG, -00) draft via http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ >> (with one warning, see below**). >> >> 2. Then I attempt to submit it via https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi >> >> The system comes back with "Your draft has NOT been verified to meet IDNITS requirements. (View IDNITS Results)" >> and the nits results are completely blank (https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/47888/#) >> >> Last time this happened I submitted a ticket without result, and when I >> tried the submission again a day later, it worked fine. This time, I will >> try again tomorrow... >> >> Is it possible that the manual idnits run is leaving behind some state that causes >> the idnits run during the upload to fail? >> >> ** The warning that I get is: >> >> == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may >> comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 >> work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal >> Provisions document at http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine >> if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. >> >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > -- I'm transitioning to a new PGP key at the moment, see details at http://www.levkowetz.com/gpg-key-transition-2013-01-18.txt.asc pub 4096R/8FBB171A 2013-01-21 [expires: 2015-01-21] Key fingerprint = 89F8 DCE7 EAE7 2F53 0905 C652 4E9B 574B 8FBB 171A Henrik Levkowetz From mcr@sandelman.ca Thu Feb 7 06:03:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D803621F8632; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:03:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEWrzmZJ55ur; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBA021F85F0; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2022016D; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:09:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 52E7414852; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:02:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D9A24691; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:02:51 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org Subject: [Tools-discuss] referring to IESG review of comments X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:03:53 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On an IESG Evaluation, I can hit the + to bring up the comments, and I can click on the red/green/grey box to bring it up, and then on the left I can pick the balloon to scroll to an individual comment. I find it annoying that I get this pop-up, that I can't middle click to get it in a new tab. When I pick comments from on AD, the URL at the top of my screen changes to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/GROUP/#IESGMEMBER which isn't really useful. When I copy-link-address, I get, (for this specific case): http://datatracker.ietf.org/streams/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl/history and I want Brian Haberman's comments, so I tried: http://datatracker.ietf.org/streams/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl/history/#bria= n-haberman but it didn't scroll to the right place.... Would this kind of thing be desireable?=20=20 =2D-=20 Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works=20 IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUAURO0C4qHRg3pndX9AQL7JgQA2Dyn8uA6MOCbOnO+JL9243Ydc4AV+vln Lcng9xCWtFuMuZUe5rrdq1rY2ezZHQ7keyIKQER92rHCGs+4kCqOdxDi8fhwfm6A O1volySAdZMDg3uqZZU8wzIVyqNqEPFb4ETXal/WsMVShe7x0yTxV+t31Y0j3mir X0i5bYpzI3Q= =PbFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From henrik@levkowetz.com Thu Feb 7 06:16:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23C121F8632; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOyrFlrbn04Q; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387FC21F85F0; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:b562:aa98:f3f1:dc7a] (port=59338 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3SGO-0003rW-U5; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:15:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:15:38 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Richardson References: <3440.1360245771@sandelman.ca> In-Reply-To: <3440.1360245771@sandelman.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:b562:aa98:f3f1:dc7a X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tools-discuss@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] referring to IESG review of comments X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:16:39 -0000 Hi Michael, One rather fundamental question, and some comments, inline: On 2013-02-07 15:02 Michael Richardson said: > > On an IESG Evaluation, Umm. I can think of several places to find these, but I don't seem to find one that matches your description. An example URL, please? > I can hit the + to bring up the comments, and > I can click on the red/green/grey box to bring it up, and then on the > left I can pick the balloon to scroll to an individual comment. > > I find it annoying that I get this pop-up, that I can't middle click > to get it in a new tab. Ok. I don't have enough javascript foo to know if it's possible to differentiate left, right, and middle-click for this case, though. > When I pick comments from on AD, the URL > at the top of my screen changes to > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/GROUP/#IESGMEMBER > > which isn't really useful. Agreed. > When I copy-link-address, I get, (for this specific case): > http://datatracker.ietf.org/streams/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl/history > > and I want Brian Haberman's comments, so I tried: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/streams/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl/history/#brian-haberman > > but it didn't scroll to the right place.... Would this kind of thing > be desireable? I think yes, provided we first arrange for a modified version of this view to be available in a separate tab. Best regards, Henrik From olau@iola.dk Thu Feb 7 07:01:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B073F21F84F2 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:01:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EIXpL0ZXUCt for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F2521F8735 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:01:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fj18so1648221vbb.40 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=0D5MI2occNa80ngKWhHnny/uJXO/F9aKzfIJPTY3DYQ=; b=Pp8I1EQsN89G/abVo6zG6xWRWnx6Faat8t8kflj0MpX7RZdPm1hUGiPK0ZIgqx1g7r g79Tvv73SKJqau/1NtClVBtUZSG8hqZbsOy4CoaMLH5mCsLxSDENg6aYxTQG8pGg0oV7 G8bLp9Nn+AA0h7/0lalUP5E9ZCT61sbJLNMavZbGH4vgVAqGA1dTD8sLNjY+P7oYUeEv r9BxyAPdzswigbj8nEVHzBBc60qy9cNIbFa69zTyvtXm84N4ggiQuUQtpKmjzdmOJ0dN +H7Pi+y5Z1tv9O83A6RldNu851timJ8wXiKzKlPkv5ese/9ks9nfMDiq9/6ZtlaENWtJ lxrw== X-Received: by 10.52.88.237 with SMTP id bj13mr1709493vdb.75.1360249285304; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:01:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.96.79 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:01:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> References: <3440.1360245771@sandelman.ca> <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> From: Ole Laursen Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:01:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDzoIi/8HDqO9T2R+x1WuezTjoztxBBDEKLPsTno9CUhIHUfVd19Fs3DzjEoXW4C3OsFaz Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] referring to IESG review of comments X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:01:26 -0000 2013/2/7 Henrik Levkowetz : >> I can hit the + to bring up the comments, and >> I can click on the red/green/grey box to bring it up, and then on the >> left I can pick the balloon to scroll to an individual comment. I guess you are talking about the ballot icons that appear in the draft tables, e.g. on a WG http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/ The way this is constructed has annoyed me for some time, so I'm planning to fix this problem when I get to it in the cleanup project. (The unobtrusive way to design this is to make the icon a proper link, then add the popup behaviour through Javascript for left-click. The right-click handler is an abomination, but I guess some people may be used to it so I plan on porting it over.) The + popup is somewhat odd, it actually just shows some history for the document, coincidentally in your case those are the ballot comments. I'm currently of the opinion that the + popup doesn't make sense with the new database schema, so if someone is using it, please speak up. :) Ole From mcr@sandelman.ca Thu Feb 7 08:54:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722A021F8635; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:54:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yx8v3-FO0zQQ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C409B21F8715; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5E42016D; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:00:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A559C14852; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:53:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9737F24691; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:53:36 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: Henrik Levkowetz In-Reply-To: <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> References: <3440.1360245771@sandelman.ca> <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] referring to IESG review of comments X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:54:38 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "Henrik" =3D=3D Henrik Levkowetz writes: Henrik> Umm. I can think of several places to find these, but I Henrik> don't seem to find one that matches your description. An Henrik> example URL, please? http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/ click on + or green/red/review for draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-09 or draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-16 =2D-=20 Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works=20 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUAURPcEIqHRg3pndX9AQKbeAP6A8Ks10DdMPv9V3mTvGXexlWQXEFAaxBp o0pRII7U+S7cmK19EilIi3/gsaPgYootvd4XqLvRlaXgFJe2n3PEykXk95T7cKRA Piq6iAuJc59teplTQf7oz2yL7boWR3A+1FVCxmeUrHtrNopmM5W2znOWtB4mI/rq QtWyhpfDheM= =87DW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From henrik@levkowetz.com Thu Feb 7 10:03:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA5921F8845; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:03:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8mi9thhQ+MT; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066FC21F8821; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from h25n7-s-oev-a31.ias.bredband.telia.com ([81.229.146.25]:55262 helo=vigonier.lan) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Vos-00007N-2O; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:03:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5113EC68.9060006@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:03:20 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Richardson References: <3440.1360245771@sandelman.ca> <5113B70A.6080503@levkowetz.com> <3710.1360256016@sandelman.ca> In-Reply-To: <3710.1360256016@sandelman.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8522E6DA86978D4E520CD523" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.229.146.25 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tools-discuss@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] referring to IESG review of comments X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:03:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8522E6DA86978D4E520CD523 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On 2013-02-07 17:53 Michael Richardson said the following: >=20 >>>>>> "Henrik" =3D=3D Henrik Levkowetz writes: >=20 > Henrik> Umm. I can think of several places to find these, but I > Henrik> don't seem to find one that matches your description. An > Henrik> example URL, please? >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/ > click on + or green/red/review for > draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-09 > or draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-16 Ah. Thank you. Then I know exactly what you're thinking of. Suggestions for alternative implementations of the popup pane which would= also let you get to a separate page would be welcome :-) Best regards, Henrik --------------enig8522E6DA86978D4E520CD523 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRE+xvAAoJEE6bV0uPuxca3xMP/isdL7bBspNOQw4fM8mANbWw BhjK1uUChSKk5oVm9VTYf8qr804wQzb5DuXE8l6qJ5ME+NemDPz4tGb9w16UDTmr 09gouvSVWOeZPdlmMCyC6EfupJOYbhc95prILdirPUSFdbaKsy5QCtWuRE5xRXEu wghu5V4vphj53kIk0W7utwESshWoFRTO9onXkOwS/KtBQN14QtOB5xyzEHDeylJG TMD8Ipq5oONycHqDWm1AQYO7dJD36otU1NXcub9F5q1eN0MTOTJoUcKrSSU/m2h9 IOMojWTU51Jm1LF+4aZh/nqQHLA+9tfbfyGE6QjbVM+NM1/a1FdNGTDQjSojS+rI sgaN/QFII52PbB/p130+xjN8VcaMKs2Gbwiyq5KmYlnO0FGdA/4aXQerfiqWu4Kh wDPHOTFNpdBbFxDwTONpcm7x7driayVG7Xgpu+l35yf4DpZut3MftU48nDaLTFBF HgC8BE9rCCo/PGeMOLQ6MaW9N7gSn5SmFrM5PBb+znDDkcadipklvTYoWNKtVcKr Iy93L+3lYlteAE/0hvWJcy/WNo1Su8GF66kOFg3qlt8EQU3BpUde9xmg2UJ8uGCl 2vOZGOj8JPlQEiQGjkUG9BGemwdJptcGerk/YVziK2eQipmXqXSLvceauFEEMklB YQOUixFS8dbBSTEe/IBH =cAXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8522E6DA86978D4E520CD523-- From yaronf.ietf@gmail.com Fri Feb 8 02:40:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E876821F86BE for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:40:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.141 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NS2NCm-xwpRQ for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1887721F8A6B for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 02:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e53so1945113eek.40 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JhpEifk+bNtSWnZaQkb9zLdacd8/qFHtiVMeYhCR4JM=; b=lRXKsT2K/cj1eENfH4pMz72KbPF+gHCOuejiZV5XBI/rTLtg+3zuTDWfzFVTtatXJN hXsyVnXUjC1uunTYJSHNhhKMZLB/kDTsjedeuHdSF0poySwS+8iCl8slqRrqiOgx0BVo fJ3ZaFWNsVvIB499LfDjjO5Tf8PMX6G1kT0+KOMEESd/Zh2VxqH+q6PfaHh2w1tiqQZS zqx7CKzYtBPAWus/Y+ZFghRLVzBB2D7qlfZMGqBZLqUCRqtZ2eemm/mqyYwTxehcUDGQ 2/kUrYIY4YwzD5fncugVu+yi94pgWkvsG+lf68g8mS5Gox4ao+LED1tTS1gSPJbIlRTL 4NuA== X-Received: by 10.14.193.131 with SMTP id k3mr14601187een.45.1360320036160; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.5] ([109.65.117.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm46574633eeo.17.2013.02.08.02.40.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:40:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5114D622.90307@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:40:34 +0200 From: Yaron Sheffer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Tools-discuss] Tools-style agenda X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:40:38 -0000 Hi,

the agenda page that was just published ( http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/) is broken, specifically color tagging doesn't work. Chrome reports lots of exceptions, such as JQuery missing.

Thanks,
    Yaron
From yaronf.ietf@gmail.com Tue Feb 19 13:50:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B95421E8064 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.141 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xD3Cmlhtheup for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247ED21E803A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so3063072eaa.7 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QiScRcvpxNTZi642cjx86lVRVVdpTprXmowZk19VLck=; b=JptoWK3iqmfYo9kHNhHDBrAL7khNIwC9lwtyxVJ1eoZiyjVJet8WpUq97PBMg2mqHm o+ZVWRUY4+TPZ25HvlfLFwBlkePbN3lI2SN8CFvxeAHV3RgHbFryNJ+PPJkjU4XJhsyl DWOF5H+N1Uj6+mfJh3JE3JMXk/+Njwb4KNtKyyzpexmfVco0glj4cDyM+I2ybNR4oRxh sJ6o10AA50jwggX1xYUvU+BEqXMGyqYOextVUjfVQJcuF1LxHjfSj0i7QQULNlprnO4x 0jjefdIkBKNdfztHbTQhUJCzCXy1sMXXRzOq06rbhk7uZIRFGbWfe9A0s5aMedwSO5Yv QT0w== X-Received: by 10.14.182.71 with SMTP id n47mr61535787eem.11.1361310657328; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (bzq-109-65-129-206.red.bezeqint.net. [109.65.129.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s3sm35547835eem.4.2013.02.19.13.50.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5123F3BD.3040702@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:53 +0200 From: Yaron Sheffer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Tools-discuss] List of drafts on the status page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:50:59 -0000 Hi,

on our status page ( http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/) there's a list of "related active documents". But many of them are not really active, they've been published as RFCs. For example, we have "draft-devarapalli-ipsec-ikev2-redirect replaced by draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect", but that one was published as RFC 5685 (which is noted at the top of the same page). Shouldn't such documents be omitted from the list altogether?

Thanks,
    Yaron
From henrik@levkowetz.com Wed Feb 20 06:43:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A50E21F87E4 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.506 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qenMzhzfnDJa for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ADD21F869E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:43:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyn-fg128.sth.netnod.se ([77.72.226.128]:49377) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Ati-0003GQ-Nx; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:50 +0100 Message-ID: <5124E126.9060204@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:50 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yaron Sheffer References: <5123F3BD.3040702@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5123F3BD.3040702@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 77.72.226.128 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org) Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] List of drafts on the status page X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:43:52 -0000 Hi Yaron, On 2013-02-19 22:50 Yaron Sheffer said: > Hi, > > on our status page ( http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/) there's a list of > "related active documents". But many of them are not really active, they've been > published as RFCs. For example, we have "draft-devarapalli-ipsec-ikev2-redirect > replaced by draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect", but that one was published as > RFC 5685 (which is noted at the top of the same page). Shouldn't such documents > be omitted from the list altogether? Yup, that seems reasonable. I'll see if I can make it so :-) Best regards, Henrik From mcr@sandelman.ca Mon Feb 25 08:26:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823A521F955D for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEftgL8cwf4X for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B2321F9569 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE452016F for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:33:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 741316388D; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:24:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECF963769 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:24:52 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Subject: [Tools-discuss] agenda.html area colours X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:26:24 -0000 Is there some reason that the agenda.html template has all of the colou^Hrs as inline style sheet rather than having this in the ietf.css? Is there some interest in making the colours part of the database? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ From adam@nostrum.com Mon Feb 25 08:49:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589B321F94CC for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:49:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.991 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZXD9qPBb-6L for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907AF21F94B2 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:49:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-144-32.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.144.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1PGnaXw038520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:49:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com) Message-ID: <512B9620.8080308@nostrum.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:49:36 -0600 From: Adam Roach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Richardson References: <21177.1361809492@sandelman.ca> In-Reply-To: <21177.1361809492@sandelman.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.144.32 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] agenda.html area colours X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:49:41 -0000 On 2/25/13 10:24, Michael Richardson wrote: > Is there some reason that the agenda.html template has all of the > colou^Hrs as inline style sheet rather than having this in the ietf.css? Assuming you're talking about the datatracker agenda (rather than the tools tracker), it's mostly because I only do what I can get accomplished in a one-day coding session three times a year, and sometimes that involves shortcuts to just get things done quickly. > Is there some interest in making the colours part of the database? You seem to have some -- come to the sprint and do it! /a From mcr@sandelman.ca Mon Feb 25 18:56:13 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D21F21E8143 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:56:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.149 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubhCO8ZyRPB8 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:56:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADA421E80B3 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2744D2016F; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:03:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 824CA63A5C; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:55:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399563A5B; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:55:00 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: Adam Roach In-Reply-To: <512B9620.8080308@nostrum.com> References: <21177.1361809492@sandelman.ca> <512B9620.8080308@nostrum.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] agenda.html area colours X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:56:13 -0000 >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Roach writes: Adam> On 2/25/13 10:24, Michael Richardson wrote: >> Is there some reason that the agenda.html template has all of the >> colou^Hrs as inline style sheet rather than having this in the >> ietf.css? Adam> Assuming you're talking about the datatracker agenda (rather Adam> than the tools tracker), it's mostly because I only do what I Adam> can get accomplished in a one-day coding session three times a Adam> year, and sometimes that involves shortcuts to just get things Adam> done quickly. It's a fair enough reason, and I suspected as much. >> Is there some interest in making the colours part of the >> database? Adam> You seem to have some -- come to the sprint and do it! I actually am working on the automatic agenda editing stuff. I want to match the colours. I've moved them into code for now, generating the inline CSS for agenda.html as before. It could be added to group_group as a new field if we wanted even more flexability, but I didn't do that, because I'm not convinced we need it. (Maybe the IESG will reorg itself this though...) I will be at the sprint. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ From stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Wed Feb 27 05:15:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9176F21F85AF for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:15:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reVd50-P0j4I for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C88C21F856C for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3748BE3E; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:42 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2rq-ETL6a1xm; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.46.30.130]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3E5BBE1E; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:41 +0000 From: Stephen Farrell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Levkowetz X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Subject: [Tools-discuss] closing kerberos/merting with kitten X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:15:10 -0000 Hi Henrik, A question for you (or whoever knows) before I hit some tracker buttons. We're merging the kerberos and kitten working groups and doing that by closing kerberos and re-chartering kitten. The kitten re-charter is now done so its time to close kerberos. Q: are there any likely muck-ups that'll happen related to tooling when we do that and is there anything we should do to avoid/mitigate those? I guess I'm mostly thinking about draft-ietf-krb-wg-* drafts and what might happen with those if we do/don't rename 'em to draft-ietf-kitten-* (I suspect authors will prefer to keep the current draft names). I don't think we need rush, so probably best is to chat in a hallway in Orlando after we'd had a chance to ponder it a bit. If need be, we can try arrange a time to meet with the kitten chairs if there's a lot to talk about (I suspect there isn't). Thanks in advance, S. From hartmans@mit.edu Wed Feb 27 05:36:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D730021F85BB for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.747 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BijnFoJ-DsU9 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6758821F85B4 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76734201C1; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:31:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 89367447B; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:36:10 -0500 (EST) From: Sam Hartman To: Stephen Farrell References: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:36:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> (Stephen Farrell's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:41 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , Henrik Levkowetz , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] closing kerberos/merting with kitten X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:36:12 -0000 I do have one specific question. Stephen, draft-ietf-krb-wg-pkinit-alg-agility is expected to come to you the week of IETF. Josh has asked for a minor revision, and Margaret will be doing that as soon as the draft window re-opens (unless you want to approve an exception to get it out of the way sooner). How do we handle this draft in terms of the wg closure? From stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Wed Feb 27 05:41:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580B21F85E7 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:41:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RwmOmeyyl8a for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:41:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A8B21F85DF for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:41:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7010BE4D; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:40:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c+DlbvIiLFQX; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:40:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.46.30.130]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E97C6BDDC; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:40:46 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <512E0CDE.50604@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:40:46 +0000 From: Stephen Farrell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Hartman References: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , Henrik Levkowetz , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] closing kerberos/merting with kitten X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:41:10 -0000 On 02/27/2013 01:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > I do have one specific question. Stephen, > draft-ietf-krb-wg-pkinit-alg-agility is expected to come to you the week > of IETF. Josh has asked for a minor revision, and Margaret will be > doing that as soon as the draft window re-opens (unless you want to > approve an exception to get it out of the way sooner). If you get me the updated draft and the pub-req then I'm fine with getting it published since that'll save a bit of face-to-face time. > How do we handle this draft in terms of the wg closure? It'll become a kitten draft I guess. Next telechat is tomorrow and then not for a month so it'd be on that one earliest and krb-wg should be gone by then. Cheers, S. From henrik@levkowetz.com Wed Feb 27 06:11:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5761E21F873D for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:11:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgGdN1aS+mSF for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:11:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099F121F8749 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:4c4e:bad7:4c4f:8fe8] (port=60014 helo=tannat.netnod.se) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UAhjB-0001lK-BP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:11:25 +0100 Message-ID: <512E140D.1010602@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:11:25 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Farrell References: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <512E06C1.5080105@cs.tcd.ie> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:4c4e:bad7:4c4f:8fe8 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org) Resent-To: hartmans-ietf@mit.edu, josh.howlett@ja.net, shawn.emery@oracle.com, Resent-Message-Id: <20130227141137.099F121F8749@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:11:37 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: henrik@levkowetz.com Cc: "kitten-chairs@tools.ietf.org" , "tools-discuss@ietf.org Discussion" Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] closing kerberos/merting with kitten X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:11:41 -0000 Hi Stephen, On 2013-02-27 14:14 Stephen Farrell said: > > Hi Henrik, > > A question for you (or whoever knows) before I hit some > tracker buttons. > > We're merging the kerberos and kitten working groups and > doing that by closing kerberos and re-chartering kitten. > The kitten re-charter is now done so its time to close > kerberos. > > Q: are there any likely muck-ups that'll happen related to > tooling when we do that and is there anything we should do > to avoid/mitigate those? > > I guess I'm mostly thinking about draft-ietf-krb-wg-* > drafts and what might happen with those if we do/don't > rename 'em to draft-ietf-kitten-* (I suspect authors > will prefer to keep the current draft names). Right. We should then mark those drafts as belonging to kitten, so they're listed under that WG. > I don't think we need rush, so probably best is to chat > in a hallway in Orlando after we'd had a chance to > ponder it a bit. If need be, we can try arrange a time > to meet with the kitten chairs if there's a lot to > talk about (I suspect there isn't). Sounds good to me. Best regards, Henrik -- I'm transitioning to a new PGP key at the moment, see details at http://www.levkowetz.com/gpg-key-transition-2013-01-18.txt.asc pub 4096R/8FBB171A 2013-01-21 [expires: 2015-01-21] Key fingerprint = 89F8 DCE7 EAE7 2F53 0905 C652 4E9B 574B 8FBB 171A Henrik Levkowetz From marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca Wed Feb 27 17:44:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7F621F85BF for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:44:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.472 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mXCUPe5YKbJx for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:44:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA51A21F8569 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mb.lan (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD37403C5; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:44:14 -0500 (EST) From: Marc Blanchet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:44:13 -0500 Message-Id: To: webmaster@tools.ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: Tools discussion Subject: [Tools-discuss] calendar tools missing one item X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:44:19 -0000 Hello, for IETF86, http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/calendar: when selection = "all session .ics file", it does not include the IAB iab-wcit session. = I guess that this is because it is a special case. (or on purpose ;-)) Marc. From sm@resistor.net Thu Feb 28 00:52:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D1721F8BA4 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:52:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.579 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oldrWBS1FAn for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DD121F8B33 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:52:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1S8qFUv025868 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:52:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1362041539; bh=ygD1tJJDeV6ogS+770pfl/2EXOpDvZsZxdcHS7rGnUg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=4Ufljqk7rkETu28SrASkfACBwUAlawC4TBRFhykSBwNZGttMFVu2chI7UZShSTt6/ WYvsnWJvQIP1UqhyMpYukgNrlhNHuCtUKo8r2P7OLok+4CvVxBGvHga2+nOsQw+l/S 54KNF5uMIofOwG5R6Q/QPXT8nuCYdUFJ/JbtpgQA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1362041539; i=@resistor.net; bh=ygD1tJJDeV6ogS+770pfl/2EXOpDvZsZxdcHS7rGnUg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=usA6uHOyl4d+Ti3uyuo9bRmxKq3SuPfUwBKpRdAQ11OJVoKuN0CAhAyyj7qi/KYQw OxXmvqPcF+g9Ys2AbHe/JpNgsF1Z/PldWhpnW154wNyZjz0bjYpA0ShEQ94Co6Wf7j ahgiKY+m1qrBymFQMK+8DVhlKJXFRXP11wExd4Lg= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130228004552.0a5dcc60@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:52:02 -0800 To: tools-discuss@ietf.org From: SM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: [Tools-discuss] Mail to to nokia.com X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:52:27 -0000 Hello, I replied to a message from a user from nokia.com. This is what I see from my side: ... while talking to mx1.nokia.com.: >>> DATA <<< 551 5.0.0 DKIM failed 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable BTW, the DKIM failure is due to an issue at my end. Regards, -sm From derhoermi@gmx.net Thu Feb 28 05:29:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBBE21F87F6 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:29:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.663 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.553, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VBkRq3tAu5Z for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEC321F87D7 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWMYG-1ULRYQ2vVa-00XYKG for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:29:04 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 13:29:04 -0000 Received: from p54B4E1A4.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO netb.Speedport_W_700V) [84.180.225.164] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2013 14:29:04 +0100 X-Authenticated: #723575 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/pmUJN/2/pkTjpok44napoy2DjZs2uf/ggu3P6zt GLKkfr9pDWzmfz From: Bjoern Hoehrmann To: tools-discuss@ietf.org Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:29:05 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: [Tools-discuss] [rfcmarkup] bad title extraction for some RFCs X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:29:07 -0000 Hi, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3156 is "MIME Security with OpenPGP" but has `RFC 3156 - I-D Tag:`, more at http://www.google.com/search?q=site:tools.ietf.org+%22I-D+Tag%22 (Also, mojibake on http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/). regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ From henrik@levkowetz.com Thu Feb 28 06:24:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70F121F8518 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:24:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEkyOjaEi6PG for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:24:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AFB21F84D9 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:24:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:613c:dedb:83a7:6431] (port=54831 helo=tannat.netnod.se) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UB4PW-0001Fs-0o; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:24:38 +0100 Message-ID: <512F68A5.8000502@levkowetz.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:24:37 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Blanchet References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:613c:dedb:83a7:6431 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca, webmaster@tools.ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on grenache.tools.ietf.org) Cc: webmaster@tools.ietf.org, Tools discussion Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] calendar tools missing one item X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:24:48 -0000 Hi Marc, On 2013-02-28 02:44 Marc Blanchet said: > Hello, for IETF86, http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/calendar: when > selection "all session .ics file", it does not include the IAB > iab-wcit session. I guess that this is because it is a special case. > (or on purpose ;-)) No, the script which generates the .ics file from the agenda had some regular expressions which matched on the areas + IRTF; I've now added IAB too. Eventually I hope we can transition to the calendars generated on the datatracker, as they are being generated by a less brittle mechanism. The calendar files should include the IAB session after the next update. Best regards, Henrik